Apple et al v. INVT SPE LLC
`U.S. Patent No. 7,764,711
`
`IPR2018-01476
`Oral Hearing, January 14, 2020
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`

`

`Key Disputes
`
`1. Claim Construction. The challenged claims require
`simultaneous use of transmit diversity (TD) and spatial
`multiplexing (MIMO)
`2. Substantive Failure. The asserted references fail to teach
`“simultaneous” TD and MIMO, where TD is used for a
`“specific” [higher priority] data item
`3. Motivation to combine. Failed to meet burden to show
`why POSITA would expect success, particularly where
`Huang teaches away
`4. Secondary Considerations. At least some weight
`supporting non-obviousness.
`
`2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,764,711
`NO. 7,764,711
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`I.II‘:.
`“rm. I III.
`lluadel mun.- :5
`r- -.r . DJII‘III} .II..I:.\.-.
`TfiTJZ-l
`'-
`Jun. 12 21
`l'r
`'PII bIlmIlnn Duh!
`HS :Im IJJFASIIp \|
`NM I. Em?
`Immd Uh. Appliraliufl “at:
`' ..IrIIIIM N... “33: an Illul ..\
`IV I.II‘IIIIUIKII\I‘J IIII
`.\pI.
`IF.
`IUULIIIIVI I’m #9.
`.Jc-U.
`I-mL-Iun Apprxmm
`:Jm
`
`rm.
`M»! u. 31m
`
`. Minn“:
`
`US 7.764.?” I32
`I|0JP1III£IIINILI
`In. United States Patent
`
`Sudu I.I*I Dale of Palm": Jul. 21..
`
`(-mn IRusnllsfillIsAblnk I'ILIaJMI
`I54I
`( l}\l\
`“fill
`IN MII'I
`Illkcnlllil
`lIInIa Ibudu.\
`IIIlIIIII
`‘.
`I'umumlir l
`'m pm
`
`._ .......F
`
`JI’I
`I:
`
`It'..uIIIIuI;III
`IIJI<I.II.\I |'.\I|-NI lxx'l MI NIH
`||l"IIS|
`II.' lwu
`I'mulI
`It
`(JIIIIRI'IJIIIIt'\l'|11h\;
`I Imamnu-unl mum IIq\\n.I..Ic.I.\I.Ig. I'-
`I'E'IIIIIiIIIIL-III
`'I‘.II'-In‘~I'|r.III
`r
`«1r. m I am Imam”; II. nqu. II.
`.\II:.' I R.\I( 'I
`
`llluJ.
`
`II:
`
`IszI
`I =I<I
`
`I *M
`
`II_I~'. 1'
`I'II-Id .
`
`ammu]
`. BTW-IMJTDJ'J-II
`mum.
`”Inc-mama
`7.141 251.147.
`ir‘lfiJ—‘llJi—IJ.
`445256. “III. XII. d55‘562.1.571.7.
`I. lUl 101.132.???
`21.1.2.
`: IA‘D 2.142: J?5I'29‘1}49.147.
`375961.265. 250
`m- ...IpImImI III.- Ian-.IIIIpIL-Ic search mum.
`Hekh‘nus ('Iml
`|’\|I.\II IVN‘ IIIIIIM-I
`IJU‘Iu (II.IIIl_|'\I.II
`
`ll}:
`1:5 \
`
`Iypcufduu umpul frnmtlx culeIu] mum [I In: In d'II
`LrIIusmissiun syumu. SpJuIding secIinIIs {102. In!)
`Iml xpnxnIIugg pmcuinn“ um um 5p...
`IL- Im- I.r am.
`1mm IJII: SIP emu-mm Incl IIIII [In I] wiIII dun-mu s
`Ingmms mignud II‘WI’UII‘ \lmIfl'LIIcCUMIlII mm film
`uIIIxImI mIiIIn [III'?). III! IL-IIaI oIIII-IIII Imm [Ix- Iqm
`suctims (I02. 10!; I: IIanamithd by rudim dumIgh 3d
`swikxli‘lfl-i-II IIH—ZJI transmission 5:11st [IDS-LI
`:md gnu-mm [IllfI-l. “15.2)
`[n IhIx
`impmn‘ LIN n‘ccpliun mummu on
`specific dIIuI while ml iIILailIiImIIIc Innmissm ellicic
`m. MIMo unmannimnm. 533mm.
`6 CIIIII'IE.5 Drawing Slm'll
`
`Iur
`.
`spam-IL mhmm
`stew-I
`
`Imam“
`Slum
`unnaumsim
`m.
`
`'—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`we
`mind-59M '
`5mm
`
`
`
`United States Patent
`Sudu
`
`IIIII Patent 311.:
`-;45I Date IJf Patent:
`
`US 7,764.7“ 132
`Jul. 21 20“}
`
`CD.“ I 'I'II-‘INSIIIEEIUN 'II’I’IIUII'IJH .‘IT‘III
`{ 'I‘JFIIJI.
`'I'RtNHMIhfl-‘IIIJN MH'I‘IIUD
`
`[II- L'll'l'ilil"
`
`IIirtIuLi HIIIIII. ‘I'III-IIIIIIIIIIII [JI’I
`
`.hfisignw:
`
`PHILIIMIIIIL' {'Ilrp-IIrIIIIIIn. “MIMI [JIII
`
`NcI1iL-c:
`
`Huhiwl In :IrIjI' LII-IL'IIIII'I'IL'I. 1|II: :L-rm III II'IIx
`Inlenl
`i~.~ uxtufldfi] |.'-r Llllillblfl'll undur .15
`I.
`. .HI '.
`|54Ijh'| hf; 4H Ilujm.
`
`Appl. NIL:
`
`I lflfullz-I-
`
`|-'llI.'Il:
`
`.III
`
`. 22.. III“?
`
`Prinr I’ublit'illinn IIIIIII
`
`I IS. .EWIT-‘Ji'lififififlfi AI
`
`Nut
`
`]. EII'K'IT
`
`RL'I
`
`tutl lU-i. Applicatlun Hat-a
`
`.‘Is
`Ill-"I MIMI. IIIL'IJ.
`('untimul'mn ut Implicwuun I‘m.
`.l]'IE’:IIII.'"i![1|.||I NII.
`I’I'
`-.||’2[]fli'fl[]I'1|F-J.
`IIII
`.-'I.pI'
`23.
`2004. um? I'IIL Nu. 1351.4I'I‘J.
`
`III
`I‘I_-E"-I‘I‘I.'-'l.|I‘I
`I‘If'filJll-J |53 ’
`IfI “LIST Ii.”
`IfI
`| .'-'|I||'1
`Iii“ ‘
`(I_'_' TKJII |_'-"
`I5]
`
`51' 3||||_'-
`II Ellll.‘~
`(I
`.TIJII-I-
`3 .TIJII-I-
`S EIJIH
`
`Hflmlfl
`.
`'I‘r'.1|1nn H at
`............
`'I'.:I.|l-.III L'I xl.
`|iII_u.I.'I.:I|.
`...............
`Inxiumul :I].
`
`455 FI‘III
`.
`III—4151""
`
`I'E'alfllinllnfl]
`Ft 1 II I EIC I'N I’.-".' | 'I :N' I' II H ‘1 TM] -'\"]'.‘{
`|'|."- mil-"Id
`II'I
`'|'-.HI".|
`
`[L 'IInlinIIL-d]
`IJ'J'HI'H |'[.']I|.I['.-'I.'| IUNR
`
`I’I'
`
`I' ]n1uIn.I1iun:I| .‘k'un'h RqIIIIIt Ilalml ‘Iug |'-'. Iflfld
`
`J’rI'IIIIIrI' I;'.I.'I.I.IIII':.II.-r
`{71] .'I.I'I'I'J'.|I'<I‘:I.'_ .-I_I.:I-'r.l."
`
`If. (IJ‘II'IELLICILII
`I’nhlu H [mm
`rzr .I'I'rrJII
`IJIcLIIIIIIIII 'I'I.‘I'i;._I|II. PI | ('
`
`UT]
`
`Ali-HIRH' I
`
`13m
`
`Md}- '-J. :IIIII
`
`I"IIn:'I}.-,n .-'II|.IpIiI'IIliIIII I‘riurity' ”I11"
`.f.||’f-
`ENE-I331}?
`
`JI UI1III|1|I1L1'1IIIFIII I I]:- ILu-gnwumhu III'IIL- III'ILIIIII Il‘I-I_'I||LI.L“II. In
`II Inluflnisfilun signal illl'iII Inutpulfi a: WIJLIIII filgllul ISL
`III ||.| EIIEI.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5UP mnn'wunn sodium [1 III] and :I spreading umlml III:I_-1icmI‘II'I‘-.'. 'I'I. . L"II . . .. .._ ..... ....r'. I IIIII'...__ .-r.
`
`3
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent
`
`The ’711 Patent
`
`.-t tmnsntittlng ntethnd mirth-tying a M] Mtt [ntultl-inptirf
`t:
`JItI-Ilti-ttutptlt] selteiltetllitrtsiisutittiubJ ti pl tIraIIit}- ell-lets items
`litre seine reeei ring up peratlts using at plurality-.1l'entennas in
`perullel- tlte transmitting, mether-l enmprising:
`
`1- .‘t transmitting. apparatus empltiying u M [MD [ntI-tlti-
`input-'ntulti-e-utput} seheme ut'trunsmittihg e plurality e-I'Llete
`ltents fer tt seine receiving- uppurtlttts Using u plurality til
`tlntennes irt ]"-Elrtlllt-‘l- the trttrramtitlin}:I tippttrtlttls enmptising:
`u mapping. seetin-It thttt Ineps tlte plurality ttlitltttn items te tll
`least line 131' the plurality e 1' tinteiutss: MM
`:1 tnInsulittine seetien that transmits the pluralittr et' thllEl
`items using the Ltl Iettst erte el't-lte plurality ul'u-tlteruuls te
`the ri-sreit'in
`:arntus-
`
`ted f'rum tiill'erent Fil'lltJI'IItFtrt Ftl Fl same time-
`
`wherein tlte tn ripping seerirnn generates :t replien dntn item
`it}? I'et'll lUtlllllE i-I speeitie ElFlli-l item ell'the pltlt‘ttlily‘ tt-l'tl'rtlil
`items. tLtl-Ll umps the plurality uii th-ttn items [U the at least
`t.'| nee: l'llte plureli tj; it l'enten nus suelt that the speei tier-lute
`itent end the repliee Lletu item are trultsmitted l'rnm dil-
`Ferenl Eintenuns nt Ll same time.
`
`tt “nipping step nl'n‘utppiug tlte plurality et'dste items In tit
`lti‘iIt-l ens ei' Ill-:1 plurality et'utnennus'. and
`
`it transmitting step ell transmitting the pltlrtllity til" tints
`items using- the FIT least rnte rit'the plurality rit'nntennns In
`the neeeivinp apparent us-
`
`nherein- in the mapping step- it replies t-ltlttl item is gener-
`nteti hy replientinp. :t speei tie tintn item n-I'Ihe plural ill-r ut'
`tltittl items. anti-l the pltli'tllitjr' LIl-llEI-lizl items are mapped tt-I
`the all lee st uue til the pluntltty ul' nut-runes sueli llltll the
`speei lie data item and the repliee date item are transmit-
`
`Ex. 1001 (’711 Patent) at 7:29-8:6, 8:20-35.
`
`4
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Problem To Be Solved
`
`Ex. 1001 (’711 Patent) at 1:18-27; Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 28, 30.
`
`5
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Problem To Be Solved
`
`Ex. 1001 (’711 Patent) at 1:48-52; Ex. 2002 at ¶ 30.
`
`6
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Problem To Be Solved
`
`Ex. 1001 (’711 Patent) at 1:60-67; Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 28, 31.
`
`7
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Problem To Be Solved
`
`Ex. 1001 (’711 Patent) at 1:60-67; Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 28, 31.
`
`8
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – The Invention
`
`Ex. 1001 at 7:29-8:7; Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 32-33; Ex. 1020 at 14:4-15:12.
`
`9
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – The Invention
`What is claimed is:
`1. A transmitting apparatus employing a MIMO (multi-input/multi-output)
`scheme of transmitting a plurality of data items for a same receiving
`apparatus using a plurality of antennas in parallel, the transmitting
`apparatus comprising:
`[a] a mapping section that maps the plurality of data items to at least one
`of the plurality of antennas; and
`[b] a transmitting section that transmits the plurality of data items using
`the at least one of the plurality of antennas to the receiving apparatus,
`[c] wherein the mapping section generates a replica data item by
`replicating a specific data item of the plurality of data items, and maps
`the plurality of data items to the at lest one of the plurality of antennas
`such that the specific data item and the replica data item are
`transmitted from different antennas at a same time.
`
`Ex. 1001 at 7:29-8:7; Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 32-33; Ex. 1020 at 14:4-15:12.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Claim Construction – “Specific
`Data Item”
`
`11
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Specific Data Item
`
`Institution Decision at 7
`
`12
`
`

`

`Claim Construction – “Simultaneous”
`
`13
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`The claims require “simultaneous” use of TD and MIMO.
`• Plain language of the claims
`– Preamble and element 1(c)
`• Specification
`• Figure 4
`• Unrebutted testimony of Dr. Vojcic
`
`14
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 1001 at 7:29-8:7.
`
`15
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 1001 at 7:29-8:7.
`
`16
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`INVT properly disclosed its
`contention that the preamble is
`limiting.
`• Patent Owner Response at 6
`• Ex. 2002 (Vojcic Decl.) at ¶¶ 29-33
`• Ex. 1020 (Vojcic Dep.) at 12:13-
`15:12
`
`POR at 6
`
`Ex. 2002 (Vojcic Decl.) ¶¶ 29-33.
`
`17
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`The Parties’ ITC agreed construction is silent as to
`simultaneous.
`
`Ex. 2001 (ITC Proposal) at 5.
`
`18
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`The preamble is limiting, and requires the use of MIMO
`across multiple antennas.
`• Provides substantive limitation analyzed by all parties
`(MIMO)
`• Provides antecedent basis for multiple elements
`
`19
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 1001 at 7:29-8:7.
`
`20
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 1001 at 7:29-8:7.
`
`21
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 1001 at Fig. 4, 4:31-35, 4:55-5:3.
`
`22
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 1001 at Fig. 4, 4:31-35, 4:55-5:3.
`
`23
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`Ex. 2002 (Vojcic Decl.) ¶¶ 29-33, cited at POR at 7.
`
`24
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`The Petition admits “simultaneous” is required
`
`Petition at 3-4
`
`25
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`The Petition admits “simultaneous” is required
`
`Petition at 44
`
`26
`
`

`

`The ’711 Patent – Simultaneous
`
`The claims require “simultaneous” use of TD and MIMO
`• Plain language of the claims
`– Preamble, 1(a), 1(c)
`• Specification
`• Figure 4
`• Unrebutted testimony of Dr. Vojcic
`
`Bell Communications Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Communications Corp., 55 F.3d
`615, 620 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (“When the claim drafter chooses to use both the
`preamble and the body to define the subject matter of the claimed invention,
`the invention so defined, and not some other, is the one the patent protects.”)
`
`27
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Render the
`Challenged Claims Obvious
`
`28
`
`

`

`Petitioners’ Asserted Obviousness Grounds
`
`Petition At 8-9
`
`29
`
`

`

`Petitioners’ Asserted Obviousness Grounds
`
`Petition At 9, 45
`
`30
`
`

`

`Ground 1 – Petitioners’ Obviousness Contentions
`• The Petition relies on:
`
`Element
`
`Preamble
`
`A transmitting apparatus employing a MIMO (multi-input/multi-
`output) scheme of transmitting a plurality of data items for a
`same receiving apparatus using a plurality of antennas in
`parallel, the transmitting apparatus comprising:
`
`Reference(s) Relied On
`
`Paulraj (Pet. at 18-21)
`
`1[a]
`
`1[b]
`
`1[c]
`
`A mapping section that maps the plurality of data items to at least
`one of the plurality of antennas; and
`
`Paulraj (Pet. at 21-25)
`
`A transmitting section that transmits…
`
`Paulraj (Pet. at 26-28)
`
`Wherein the mapping section generates a replica data item by
`replicating a specific data item of the plurality of data items, and
`maps the plurality of data items to the at least one of the plurality
`of antennas such that the specific data item and replica data item
`are transmitted from different antennas at a same time
`
`Paulraj, modified for
`Walton’s repetition unit
`(specific data item) and
`Huang for TD at a same
`time (Pet. at 28-37)
`
`31
`
`

`

`Element Not Taught – Simultaneous TD and MIMO
`
`Element 1(c) – “Wherein the mapping section generates a
`replica data item by replicating a specific data item of the
`plurality of data items, and maps the plurality of data
`items to the at least one of the plurality of antennas such
`that the specific data item and replica data item are
`transmitted from different antennas at a same time”
`
`32
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Ex. 1005 at 23
`
`33
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Ex. 1005 at 23
`
`34
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Ex. 1005 at 23; POR at 28-30
`
`35
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Petitioners’ Attempted Reliance on Fig. 11A is untimely
`• Nowhere in Petition is Figure 11A
`“mapped” to the claims
`• Only analysis of Fig. 11A is for
`dependent claim 3 (unrelated element)
`For independent claims, Fig. 11A only
`included in string cites
`Failure to substantively analyze Fig.
`11A in Petition preclude consideration
`of argument
`Separate embodiments – burden to
`prove why POSITA would combine
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Petition at 21, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 34, 35; Institution Decision (only citing Fig. 9A)
`
`36
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Fig. 11A fails substantively
`
`Ex. 1005 at 23, 27
`
`37
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Fig. 11A fails substantively
`
`Ex. 1005 at 29:15-30:5
`
`38
`
`

`

`Ground 1 Fails to Teach Simultaneous TD & MIMO
`
`Reply at 14
`
`39
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine
`
`Motivation to Combine
`
`40
`
`

`

`Petitioners Fail to Meet Their Burden on Motivation to Combine
`
`1. No Expectation of Success – Petitioners fail to
`explain how a POSITA would modify Paulraj to
`simultaneously process data with priorities, or why
`one would expect success in doing so
`2. Huang Teaches Away – Huang’s conclusion is to not
`use TD and MIMO simultaneously
`
`41
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine – No Expectation of Success
`
`Petitioners fail to explain how a POSITA would modify Paulraj to
`simultaneously process multiple data items with different priorities
`•
`The only signal processing taught by Paulraj does not process
`multiple datastreams (data items) simultaneously
`Thus, processing Walton’s higher priority data, at the same time as
`Paulraj’s single datastream, would require modifying Paulraj by
`adding a second datastream
`
`•
`
`42
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine – No Expectation of Success
`
`Petitioners fail to explain how a POSITA would modify Paulraj to
`simultaneously process multiple data items with different priorities
`
`Ex. 2002 at ¶ 57
`
`43
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine – No Expectation of Success
`
`•
`
`Petitioners fail to explain how a POSITA would modify Paulraj to
`simultaneously process multiple data items with different priorities
`•
`Petitioners did not rebut Dr. Vojcic’s testimony, instead only arguing in
`Reply that “physical substitution” is not required as a matter of law
`Physical substitution is not INVT or Dr. Vojcic’s argument
`– What is missing is an explanation of how the different priority data item
`would be processed simultaneously
`Petitioners bear burden to prove expectation of success,
`Petitioners choice not to address how Paulraj would be modified to
`simultanesouly process a different priority data item is fatal
`
`•
`•
`
`44
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine – Huang Teaches Away
`
`Huang’s conclusion is to not use TD and MIMO simultaneously.
`
`Ex. 1006 at 2320
`
`45
`
`

`

`Secondary Considerations
`
`46
`
`

`

`Secondary Considerations Support Non-Obviousness
`
`Unrebutted evidence of Industry Acceptance supports
`non-obviousness
`• The ’711 patent is subject to an existing patent
`license
`• Claimed inventions adopted into LTE standard
`
`47
`
`

`

`Secondary Considerations Support Non-Obviousness
`
`Claimed invention adopted into LTE Standard
`
`Ex. 2002 at ¶ 69
`
`48
`
`

`

`Secondary Considerations Support Non-Obviousness
`
`Claimed invention adopted into LTE Standard
`
`Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 72-73
`
`49
`
`

`

`Petitioners Fail to Meet Their Burden
`
`1. Claims limited to “simultaneous”
`2. Element not met:
`• Simultaneous TD and MIMO, where TD limited to higher
`priority specific data item (element 1(c))
`3. Motivation to combine:
`• Failure to explain why a POSITA would expect success
`in combining Paulraj and Walton
`• Huang teaches away
`4. Secondary Considerations support non-
`obviousness
`
`50
`
`