throbber
QUALCOMM EXHIBIT 2005
`Intel v. Qualcomm
`IPR2018-01334
`
`1135
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`BEFORE HONORABLE DANA M. SABRAW, JUDGE PRESIDING
`
`________________________________
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`PLAINTIFF, ) CASE NO. 17CV1375-DMS
`)
`VS. )
`) SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
`APPLE INC., )
`)
`DEFENDANT. ) MONDAY, MARCH 11, 2019
`________________________________)
`AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS )
`________________________________)
`
`))
`
`)
`
`REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
`JURY TRIAL, DAY 6, VOLUME 6B
`PAGES 1135-1278
`
`REPORTED BY STENOGRAPHY, TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY CAT SOFTWARE
`____________________________________________________________
`
`MAURALEE RAMIREZ, RPR, CSR NO. 11674
`FEDERAL OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
`ORDERTRANSCRIPT@GMAIL.COM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

` 1136
`
`COUNSEL APPEARING:
`FOR THE PLAINTIFF: QUINN EMANUEL URQHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
` DAVID A. NELSON
` 500 WEST MADISON STREET, SUITE 2450
` CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60661
`
` SEAN S. PAK
` MICHELLE ANN CLARK
` 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, 22ND FLOOR
` SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
`
` VALERIE A. LOZANO
` SCOTT WATSON
` 865 SOUTH FIGEUROA STREET, 10TH FLOOR
` LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
`
`FOR THE DEFENDANT: FISH & RICHARDSON
` JUANITA R. BROOKS
` 12390 EL CAMINO REAL
` SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130
`
` WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
` JOSEPH J. MUELLER
` SARAH FRAZIER
` CLAIRE SPECHT
` 60 STATE STREET
` BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109
`
` NINA S. TALLON
` 1875 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NORTHWEST
` WASHINGTON, DC 20006
` JOSEPH FRANCIS HAAG
` 950 PAGE MILL ROAD
` PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94304
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`1137
`
`SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, MARCH 11, 2019; 11:00 A.M.
`
`THE COURT: WE'RE BACK ON THE RECORD WITH ALL PRESENT.
`
`WE'LL RESUME THE CROSS—EXAMINATION, MR. PAK.
`
`MR. PAK:
`
`YES, MAY I RESUME?
`
`THE COURT: YES.
`
`MR. PAK:
`
`YOUR HONOR, CAN I APPROACH AND PUT UP A
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE?
`
`THE COURT: YES.
`
`MR. PAK:
`
`YOUR HONOR,
`
`I'VE PUT ON THE BOARD THERE
`
`PDX42.3, WHICH IS A PLAINTIFF DEMONSTRATIVE.
`
`BY MR. PAK:
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`MR. SIVA, DO YOU SEE THE DEMONSTRATIVE IN FRONT OF YOU?
`
`YEAH.
`
`ON THE LEFT—HAND SIDE,
`
`I REPRODUCED THE TESTIMONY WHEN YOU
`
`WERE TESTIFYING AS APPLE'S WITNESS ON THE GOBI PROTOCOL.
`
`DO
`
`YOU SEE THAT?
`
`MS. BROOKS:
`
`YOUR HONOR,
`
`IT'S SO FAR AWAY.
`
`COULD WE
`
`HAVE JUST THE CITATION?
`
`THE COURT: YES.
`
`MR. PAK:
`
`ARJUNA SIVA DEPOSITION AT PAGE 116, LINE 9
`
`THROUGH 17 ON THE LEFT—HAND SIDE.
`
`MS. BROOKS:
`
`THANK YOU.
`
`BY MR. PAK:
`
`Q
`
`DO YOU SEE THAT IS YOUR SWORN TESTIMONY ABOUT THE GOBI
`
`PROTOCOL?
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1137
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, MARCH 11, 2019; 11:00 A.M.
`THE COURT: WE'RE BACK ON THE RECORD WITH ALL PRESENT.
`WE'LL RESUME THE CROSS-EXAMINATION, MR. PAK.
`MR. PAK: YES, MAY I RESUME?
`THE COURT: YES.
`MR. PAK: YOUR HONOR, CAN I APPROACH AND PUT UP A
`DEMONSTRATIVE?
`THE COURT: YES.
`MR. PAK: YOUR HONOR, I'VE PUT ON THE BOARD THERE
`PDX42.3, WHICH IS A PLAINTIFF DEMONSTRATIVE.
`BY MR. PAK:
`Q
`MR. SIVA, DO YOU SEE THE DEMONSTRATIVE IN FRONT OF YOU?
`A
`YEAH.
`Q
`ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE, I REPRODUCED THE TESTIMONY WHEN YOU
`WERE TESTIFYING AS APPLE'S WITNESS ON THE GOBI PROTOCOL. DO
`YOU SEE THAT?
`MS. BROOKS: YOUR HONOR, IT'S SO FAR AWAY. COULD WE
`HAVE JUST THE CITATION?
`THE COURT: YES.
`MR. PAK: ARJUNA SIVA DEPOSITION AT PAGE 116, LINE 9
`THROUGH 17 ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE.
`MS. BROOKS: THANK YOU.
`BY MR. PAK:
`Q
`DO YOU SEE THAT IS YOUR SWORN TESTIMONY ABOUT THE GOBI
`PROTOCOL?
`
`

`

`1138
`
`YES.
`A
`AND YOU STAND BY THAT SWORN TESTIMONY, RIGHT, SIR?
`Q
`TO THE EXTENT I WAS TALKING ABOUT MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE
`A
`GOBI PROTOCOL AT THE TIME, I DO.
`Q
`AND TO THE RIGHT, I'VE REPRODUCED YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE
`FLASHLESS BOOT INVENTION THAT YOU BELIEVE IS IN THE '949
`PATENT. AND THE THIS IS AT PAGE 77, LINE 14 THROUGH 19. DO
`YOU SEE THAT TESTIMONY?
`MS. BROOKS: OBJECTION. MISCHARACTERIZES THE
`TESTIMONY.
`THE COURT: OVERRULED.
`YOU CAN CLARIFY ON REDIRECT, IF NECESSARY.
`YOU CAN ANSWER.
`THE WITNESS: YEAH. SO TO PROVIDE A BETTER CONTEXT,
`I'M TALKING ABOUT MY DESIGN HERE, WHERE TO BE ABLE TO LOAD IN
`PLACE, YOU COULDN'T HAVE HEADERS AND, HENCE, WHY I WAS EVEN
`SAYING THAT LIKE THE STANDARD. MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE
`STANDARD OF GOBI WOULDN'T FIT THAT.
`BY MR. PAK:
`Q
`SO THAT'S THE TESTIMONY THAT YOU'VE STATED IN YOUR
`DEPOSITION AT PAGE 77, LINES 14 THROUGH 19, CORRECT?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`YOU STAND BY THAT TESTIMONY AS WELL, RIGHT?
`A
`SO IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PATENT, OR YOU MEAN IN THE CONTEXT
`OF MY --
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`1139
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`YOUR DESIGN.
`
`SO IN THE CONTEXT OF MY DESIGN, YES, THERE HAD TO BE NO
`
`HEADERS IN THE ACTUAL LOADING OF THE SEGMENTS.
`
`Q
`
`AND JUST TO BE —— BECAUSE WE'VE HEARD ABOUT SOMETHING
`
`CALLED IMAGE HEADERS, YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT IMAGE HEADERS IN
`
`EITHER OF THESE TWO PIECES OF TESTIMONY, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I AM NOT.
`
`YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HEADERS ABOVE THE USB PROTOCOL, RIGHT?
`
`YEAH.
`
`AND THOSE WOULD BE SOMETIMES CALLED "PACKET HEADERS"?
`
`YES.
`
`OKAY.
`
`AND, SIR, SO THE GOBI PROTOCOL AS YOU UNDERSTOOD IT
`
`WOULD BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS YOUR DESIGN FOR
`
`THE FLASHLESS BOOT, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`THAT IS NOT CORRECT.
`
`YOU SAY:
`
`GOBI PROTOCOL USES HEADERS ABOVE USB.
`
`YOUR
`
`DESIGN, NO HEADERS ABOVE USB.
`
`THAT'S WHAT YOU TESTIFIED UNDER
`
`OATH, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`WHAT I SAID IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE GOBI PROTOCOL HAD
`
`HEADERS AND, THEREFORE,
`
`IT WOULDN'T HAVE —— IT WOULDN'T HAVE
`
`BEEN COMPATIBLE WITH MY DESIGN.
`
`Q
`
`OKAY.
`
`I THINK YOU USED THE WORD "APPLES AND ORANGES"
`
`IN
`
`YOUR DIRECT EXAMINATION?
`
`A
`
`THE GOBI PROTOCOL OPERATES AT THE PROTOCOL LAYER; WHEREAS,
`
`MY DESIGN WAS AT SYSTEM LAYER, THE FLOW OF THINGS.
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1139
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`YOUR DESIGN.
`Q
`SO IN THE CONTEXT OF MY DESIGN, YES, THERE HAD TO BE NO
`A
`HEADERS IN THE ACTUAL LOADING OF THE SEGMENTS.
`Q
`AND JUST TO BE -- BECAUSE WE'VE HEARD ABOUT SOMETHING
`CALLED IMAGE HEADERS, YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT IMAGE HEADERS IN
`EITHER OF THESE TWO PIECES OF TESTIMONY, CORRECT?
`A
`I AM NOT.
`Q
`YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HEADERS ABOVE THE USB PROTOCOL, RIGHT?
`A
`YEAH.
`Q
`AND THOSE WOULD BE SOMETIMES CALLED "PACKET HEADERS"?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`OKAY. AND, SIR, SO THE GOBI PROTOCOL AS YOU UNDERSTOOD IT
`WOULD BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS YOUR DESIGN FOR
`THE FLASHLESS BOOT, CORRECT?
`A
`THAT IS NOT CORRECT.
`Q
`YOU SAY: GOBI PROTOCOL USES HEADERS ABOVE USB. YOUR
`DESIGN, NO HEADERS ABOVE USB. THAT'S WHAT YOU TESTIFIED UNDER
`OATH, CORRECT?
`A
`WHAT I SAID IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE GOBI PROTOCOL HAD
`HEADERS AND, THEREFORE, IT WOULDN'T HAVE -- IT WOULDN'T HAVE
`BEEN COMPATIBLE WITH MY DESIGN.
`Q
`OKAY. I THINK YOU USED THE WORD "APPLES AND ORANGES" IN
`YOUR DIRECT EXAMINATION?
`A
`THE GOBI PROTOCOL OPERATES AT THE PROTOCOL LAYER; WHEREAS,
`MY DESIGN WAS AT SYSTEM LAYER, THE FLOW OF THINGS.
`
`

`

`1140
`
`Q
`
`JUST TO BE CLEAR, AS YOU UNDERSTOOD THE GOBI PROTOCOL, THAT
`
`WOULD BE INCOMPATIBLE AS IS WITH WHAT YOU WERE DESCRIBING AS
`
`YOUR DESIGN, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`AT LEAST MY LIMITED UNDERSTANDING OF IT, YES.
`
`MR. PAK:
`
`THAT'S IT, YOUR HONOR.
`
`PASS THE WITNESS.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`REDIRECT.
`
`REDIRECT EXAMINATION
`
`BY MS. BROOKS:
`
`Q
`
`JUST A FEW QUESTIONS, MR. SIVA,
`
`I PROMISE.
`
`DO YOU REMEMBER
`
`ON CROSS—EXAMINATION, COUNSEL SHOWED A LITTLE DEPOSITION
`
`CLIP —— LET ME BACK UP.
`
`YOU TESTIFIED TODAY THAT YOU HADN'T READ THE '949 PATENT OR
`
`THE CLAIMS;
`
`IS THAT RIGHT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I HAVE NOT.
`
`AND THEN DO YOU REMEMBER COUNSEL SHOWING YOU A DEPOSITION
`
`CLIP WHERE IT KIND OF SOUNDED LIKE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THE
`
`
`
`'949 PATENT?
`
`DO YOU REMEMBER THAT CLIP THAT WAS SHOWN TO YOU?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`SO I WANT TO PUT THAT CLIP IN CONTEXT.
`
`SO MR. LEE,
`
`IF WE
`
`COULD GO TO PAGE 219 OF MR. SIVA'S DEPOSITION, AND STARTING AT
`
`LINE 8.
`
`SO THIS IS A QUESTION AND ANSWER, MR. SIVA, THAT TOOK PLACE
`
`DURING YOUR DEPOSITION.
`
`AND THE PERSON ASKING YOU THE QUESTION
`
`SAID:
`
`I'LL REPRESENT TO YOU THAT EXHIBIT 29 IS A LEGAL BRIEF
`
`THAT QUALCOMM SUBMITTED IN THIS CASE.
`
`DO YOU HAVE THAT IN
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1140
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`JUST TO BE CLEAR, AS YOU UNDERSTOOD THE GOBI PROTOCOL, THAT
`Q
`WOULD BE INCOMPATIBLE AS IS WITH WHAT YOU WERE DESCRIBING AS
`YOUR DESIGN, CORRECT?
`A
`AT LEAST MY LIMITED UNDERSTANDING OF IT, YES.
`MR. PAK: THAT'S IT, YOUR HONOR. PASS THE WITNESS.
`THE COURT: REDIRECT.
`REDIRECT EXAMINATION
`
`BY MS. BROOKS:
`Q
`JUST A FEW QUESTIONS, MR. SIVA, I PROMISE. DO YOU REMEMBER
`ON CROSS-EXAMINATION, COUNSEL SHOWED A LITTLE DEPOSITION
`CLIP -- LET ME BACK UP.
`YOU TESTIFIED TODAY THAT YOU HADN'T READ THE '949 PATENT OR
`THE CLAIMS; IS THAT RIGHT?
`A
`I HAVE NOT.
`Q
`AND THEN DO YOU REMEMBER COUNSEL SHOWING YOU A DEPOSITION
`CLIP WHERE IT KIND OF SOUNDED LIKE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THE
`'949 PATENT? DO YOU REMEMBER THAT CLIP THAT WAS SHOWN TO YOU?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`SO I WANT TO PUT THAT CLIP IN CONTEXT. SO MR. LEE, IF WE
`COULD GO TO PAGE 219 OF MR. SIVA'S DEPOSITION, AND STARTING AT
`LINE 8.
`SO THIS IS A QUESTION AND ANSWER, MR. SIVA, THAT TOOK PLACE
`DURING YOUR DEPOSITION. AND THE PERSON ASKING YOU THE QUESTION
`SAID: I'LL REPRESENT TO YOU THAT EXHIBIT 29 IS A LEGAL BRIEF
`THAT QUALCOMM SUBMITTED IN THIS CASE. DO YOU HAVE THAT IN
`
`

`

`1141
`
`MIND?
`
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`
`I SAID:
`
`OKAY.
`
`ALL RIGHT.
`
`AND THEN QUESTIONER SAID:
`
`IF YOU CAN TURN TO
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`PAGE 54 OF THE EXHIBIT —— EXHIBIT 29.
`
`DO YOU SEE THAT?
`
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`
`I SAID: YES.
`
`AND THEN THE QUESTION WAS:
`
`AND DO YOU SEE THE HEADING U.S.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`PATENT NUMBER 8,838,949?
`
`AND YOUR ANSWER WAS?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`"YES."
`
`THEN IF WE GO TO PAGE 220, STARTING AT LINE 1, THE
`
`QUESTIONER ASKS YOU IN THAT LEGAL BRIEF TO TURN TO PAGE 56.
`
`DO
`
`YOU SEE THAT?
`
`AND IT SAYS:
`
`TELL ME WHEN YOU'RE THERE.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I SEE THAT.
`
`AND THEN THE QUESTIONER SAYS:
`
`DO YOU SEE IN THE MIDDLE OF
`
`THE PAGE THERE'S A PARAGRAPH THAT SAYS —— STARTS WITH QUOTE
`
`"QUALCOMM SOLUTION" UNQUOTE.
`
`AND YOU'RE ASKED:
`
`DO YOU SEE THAT.
`
`AND YOU SAID?
`
`I SAID:
`
`I DO SEE THAT PARAGRAPH.
`
`ALL RIGHT.
`
`AND THEN THE QUESTIONER, READING FROM
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`QUALCOMM'S LEGAL BRIEF SAYS THAT PARAGRAPH SAYS QUOTE:
`
`"QUALCOMM'S SOLUTION WAS TO TRANSFER THE IMAGE HEADER FIRST,
`
`SEPARATELY FROM THE REST OF THE IMAGE.
`
`THE IMAGE HEADER
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1141
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`MIND?
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`I SAID: OKAY.
`A
`ALL RIGHT. AND THEN QUESTIONER SAID: IF YOU CAN TURN TO
`Q
`PAGE 54 OF THE EXHIBIT -- EXHIBIT 29. DO YOU SEE THAT?
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`I SAID: YES.
`A
`AND THEN THE QUESTION WAS: AND DO YOU SEE THE HEADING U.S.
`Q
`PATENT NUMBER 8,838,949?
`AND YOUR ANSWER WAS?
`"YES."
`A
`THEN IF WE GO TO PAGE 220, STARTING AT LINE 1, THE
`Q
`QUESTIONER ASKS YOU IN THAT LEGAL BRIEF TO TURN TO PAGE 56. DO
`YOU SEE THAT? AND IT SAYS: TELL ME WHEN YOU'RE THERE.
`A
`I SEE THAT.
`Q
`AND THEN THE QUESTIONER SAYS: DO YOU SEE IN THE MIDDLE OF
`THE PAGE THERE'S A PARAGRAPH THAT SAYS -- STARTS WITH QUOTE
`"QUALCOMM SOLUTION" UNQUOTE.
`AND YOU'RE ASKED: DO YOU SEE THAT.
`AND YOU SAID?
`I SAID: I DO SEE THAT PARAGRAPH.
`A
`ALL RIGHT. AND THEN THE QUESTIONER, READING FROM
`Q
`QUALCOMM'S LEGAL BRIEF SAYS THAT PARAGRAPH SAYS QUOTE:
`"QUALCOMM'S SOLUTION WAS TO TRANSFER THE IMAGE HEADER FIRST,
`SEPARATELY FROM THE REST OF THE IMAGE. THE IMAGE HEADER
`
`

`

`1142
`
`SPECIFIES THE FINAL DESTINATION OF EACH DATA SEGMENT.
`
`THE
`
`SECONDARY PROCESSOR THEN USES THE IMAGE HEADER TO REQUEST EACH
`
`DATA SEGMENT, TRANSFERRING EACH DATA SEGMENT DIRECTLY FROM A
`
`HARDWARE BUFFER INTO ITS FINAL DESTINATION AND MEMORY.
`
`THIS
`
`APPROACH AVOIDS INTERMEDIATE COPIES,
`
`IMPROVING BOOT
`
`PERFORMANCE."
`
`AND YOU'RE ASKED:
`
`DO YOU SEE THAT?
`
`AND WHAT DO YOU SAY?
`
`"I SEE THAT PARAGRAPH."
`
`AND THEN YOU ARE ASKED:
`
`DO YOU AGREE THAT WAS QUALCOMM'S
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`SOLUTION?
`
`AND WHAT DID YOU ANSWER?
`
`I SAID:
`
`I DO NOT AGREE.
`
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED: WHOSE SOLUTION WAS IT?
`
`AND WE'LL
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`GO TO THE NEXT PAGE NOW. WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I SAID:
`
`IT WAS MINE.
`
`AND SO IS IT STILL YOUR TESTIMONY TODAY, MR. SIVA, THAT
`
`WHEN QUALCOMM CLAIMS QUOTE:
`
`THEIR SOLUTION WAS TO TRANSFER THE
`
`IMAGE HEADER FIRST, SEPARATELY FROM THE REST OF THE IMAGE, THE
`
`IMAGE HEADER SPECIFIES THE FINAL DESTINATION OF EACH DATA
`
`SEGMENT, THE SECONDARY PROCESSOR THEN USES THE IMAGE HEADER TO
`
`REQUEST EACH DATA SEGMENT, TRANSFERRING EACH DATA SEGMENT
`
`DIRECTLY FROM A HARDWARE BUFFER INTO ITS FINAL DESTINATION AND
`
`MEMORY, THEREBY, AVOIDING INTERMEDIATE COPIES AND IMPROVING
`
`BOOT PERFORMANCE,
`
`IS QUALCOMM ACCURATELY DESCRIBING WHAT THEIR
`
`INVENTION WAS WHEN THEY SAY THAT?
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1142
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SPECIFIES THE FINAL DESTINATION OF EACH DATA SEGMENT. THE
`SECONDARY PROCESSOR THEN USES THE IMAGE HEADER TO REQUEST EACH
`DATA SEGMENT, TRANSFERRING EACH DATA SEGMENT DIRECTLY FROM A
`HARDWARE BUFFER INTO ITS FINAL DESTINATION AND MEMORY. THIS
`APPROACH AVOIDS INTERMEDIATE COPIES, IMPROVING BOOT
`PERFORMANCE." AND YOU'RE ASKED: DO YOU SEE THAT?
`AND WHAT DO YOU SAY?
`"I SEE THAT PARAGRAPH."
`A
`AND THEN YOU ARE ASKED: DO YOU AGREE THAT WAS QUALCOMM'S
`Q
`SOLUTION?
`AND WHAT DID YOU ANSWER?
`I SAID: I DO NOT AGREE.
`A
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED: WHOSE SOLUTION WAS IT? AND WE'LL
`Q
`GO TO THE NEXT PAGE NOW. WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`A
`I SAID: IT WAS MINE.
`Q
`AND SO IS IT STILL YOUR TESTIMONY TODAY, MR. SIVA, THAT
`WHEN QUALCOMM CLAIMS QUOTE: THEIR SOLUTION WAS TO TRANSFER THE
`IMAGE HEADER FIRST, SEPARATELY FROM THE REST OF THE IMAGE, THE
`IMAGE HEADER SPECIFIES THE FINAL DESTINATION OF EACH DATA
`SEGMENT, THE SECONDARY PROCESSOR THEN USES THE IMAGE HEADER TO
`REQUEST EACH DATA SEGMENT, TRANSFERRING EACH DATA SEGMENT
`DIRECTLY FROM A HARDWARE BUFFER INTO ITS FINAL DESTINATION AND
`MEMORY, THEREBY, AVOIDING INTERMEDIATE COPIES AND IMPROVING
`BOOT PERFORMANCE, IS QUALCOMM ACCURATELY DESCRIBING WHAT THEIR
`INVENTION WAS WHEN THEY SAY THAT?
`
`

`

`1143
`
`A
`
`SO IN THIS CONTEXT OF JUST THAT PARAGRAPH, THAT LOOKS A LOT
`
`LIKE MY IDEA.
`
`I CAN'T SAY WHAT THAT -- LIKE IN THE CONTEXT
`
`WITH THE GREATER PATENT.
`
`Q
`
`BUT IN THE CONTEXT -- IF WE CAN GO BACK UP TO LINES 9
`
`THROUGH 18.
`
`IN THE CONTEXT OF QUALCOMM'S REPRESENTATIONS IN A
`
`LEGAL BRIEF THAT THIS WAS THEIR SOLUTION,
`
`IN THIS CONTEXT, DO
`
`YOU AGREE THAT THIS WAS THEIR SOLUTION, OR WHOSE SOLUTION WAS
`
`IT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I DISAGREE,
`
`IN THAT I THINK IT WAS MY SOLUTION.
`
`THEN TO FINISH UP THIS QUESTIONING.
`
`IF WE CAN GO TO PAGE
`
`221 WHERE WE HAD YOU SAY "IT WAS MINE."
`
`YOU WERE THEN ASKED: WHAT WAS YOUR REACTION WHEN YOU
`
`LEARNED THAT QUALCOMM HAD FILED A PATENT IN WHICH IT CLAIMS
`
`THAT THIS -- MEANING WHAT WE JUST READ -- WAS ITS SOLUTION.
`
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`
`THAT I WAS BOTH SURPRISED AND UPSET.
`
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED:
`
`WHY WERE YOU UPSET?
`
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`
`WELL,
`
`IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I HAD CREATED.
`
`DO YOU STILL FEEL THAT WAY?
`
`YEAH.
`
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED:
`
`IS THERE ANY DOUBT IN YOUR MIND
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`THAT THE SOLUTION QUALCOMM DESCRIBED ON PAGE 56 OF ITS CLAIM
`
`CONSTRUCTION BRIEF ORIGINATED WITH YOU AT APPLE?
`
`AND WHAT DID YOU ANSWER?
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1143
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SO IN THIS CONTEXT OF JUST THAT PARAGRAPH, THAT LOOKS A LOT
`A
`LIKE MY IDEA. I CAN'T SAY WHAT THAT -- LIKE IN THE CONTEXT
`WITH THE GREATER PATENT.
`Q
`BUT IN THE CONTEXT -- IF WE CAN GO BACK UP TO LINES 9
`THROUGH 18. IN THE CONTEXT OF QUALCOMM'S REPRESENTATIONS IN A
`LEGAL BRIEF THAT THIS WAS THEIR SOLUTION, IN THIS CONTEXT, DO
`YOU AGREE THAT THIS WAS THEIR SOLUTION, OR WHOSE SOLUTION WAS
`IT?
`I DISAGREE, IN THAT I THINK IT WAS MY SOLUTION.
`A
`THEN TO FINISH UP THIS QUESTIONING. IF WE CAN GO TO PAGE
`Q
`221 WHERE WE HAD YOU SAY "IT WAS MINE."
`YOU WERE THEN ASKED: WHAT WAS YOUR REACTION WHEN YOU
`LEARNED THAT QUALCOMM HAD FILED A PATENT IN WHICH IT CLAIMS
`THAT THIS -- MEANING WHAT WE JUST READ -- WAS ITS SOLUTION.
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`THAT I WAS BOTH SURPRISED AND UPSET.
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED: WHY WERE YOU UPSET?
`AND WHAT WAS YOUR ANSWER?
`WELL, IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I HAD CREATED.
`A
`DO YOU STILL FEEL THAT WAY?
`Q
`YEAH.
`A
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED: IS THERE ANY DOUBT IN YOUR MIND
`Q
`THAT THE SOLUTION QUALCOMM DESCRIBED ON PAGE 56 OF ITS CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION BRIEF ORIGINATED WITH YOU AT APPLE?
`AND WHAT DID YOU ANSWER?
`
`A
`Q
`
`

`

`1144
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I SAID I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT IT ORIGINATED WITH ME.
`
`AND DO YOU STILL FEEL THAT WAY?
`
`YES,
`
`I DO.
`
`THANK YOU.
`
`THANK YOU, MR. LEE.
`
`JUST A COUPLE OTHER REALLY MINOR POINTS, MORE FOR THE
`
`RECORD THAN ANYTHING.
`
`YOU WERE SHOWN PX593, AND IT WAS A
`
`SERIES OF EMAILS BACK AND FORTH, DO YOU REMEMBER, FROM
`
`MR. SOORDELU TO YOU?
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`IF WE CAN GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SECOND PAGE, WE SEE THE
`
`STEP 3?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`
`THE BL3 WILL DOWNLOAD AMSS FROM THE AP AND PARSE/SEGMENT IT
`
`APPROPRIATELY BEFORE PLACING IT IN THE DDR MEMORY.
`
`NOW LET'S STOP THERE.
`
`BEFORE BEING SHOWN THIS ONE,
`
`I THINK
`
`YOU WERE SHOWN ANOTHER EMAIL CHAIN, AND YOU DIDN'T NOTICE THAT
`
`IT THEN SAID:
`
`TO BE SPECIFIC, THE STEPS IN THIS PHASE MAY
`
`REQUIRE.
`
`DO YOU REMEMBER THAT BACK AND FORTH WITH MR. AON?
`
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`
`WHEN YOU SAW THIS, YOU SAID —— ORIGINALLY I THINK YOU SAID
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`OH, THAT'S MISLEADING.
`
`AND WHEN YOU SAW THIS, YOU SAID:
`
`I
`
`WANT TO RETRACT MY PREVIOUS STATEMENT.
`
`FOR THE RECORD, WE NEED
`
`TO MAKE SURE, WHAT ARE YOU RETRACTING?
`
` 1144
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`A
`Q
`A
`Q
`
`I SAID I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT IT ORIGINATED WITH ME.
`AND DO YOU STILL FEEL THAT WAY?
`YES, I DO.
`THANK YOU.
`THANK YOU, MR. LEE.
`JUST A COUPLE OTHER REALLY MINOR POINTS, MORE FOR THE
`RECORD THAN ANYTHING. YOU WERE SHOWN PX593, AND IT WAS A
`SERIES OF EMAILS BACK AND FORTH, DO YOU REMEMBER, FROM
`MR. SOORDELU TO YOU?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`IF WE CAN GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SECOND PAGE, WE SEE THE
`STEP 3?
`A
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`Q
`THE BL3 WILL DOWNLOAD AMSS FROM THE AP AND PARSE/SEGMENT IT
`APPROPRIATELY BEFORE PLACING IT IN THE DDR MEMORY.
`NOW LET'S STOP THERE. BEFORE BEING SHOWN THIS ONE, I THINK
`YOU WERE SHOWN ANOTHER EMAIL CHAIN, AND YOU DIDN'T NOTICE THAT
`IT THEN SAID: TO BE SPECIFIC, THE STEPS IN THIS PHASE MAY
`REQUIRE.
`DO YOU REMEMBER THAT BACK AND FORTH WITH MR. AON?
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`A
`WHEN YOU SAW THIS, YOU SAID -- ORIGINALLY I THINK YOU SAID
`Q
`OH, THAT'S MISLEADING. AND WHEN YOU SAW THIS, YOU SAID: I
`WANT TO RETRACT MY PREVIOUS STATEMENT. FOR THE RECORD, WE NEED
`TO MAKE SURE, WHAT ARE YOU RETRACTING?
`
`

`

`1145
`
`A
`
`SO I'M RETRACTING THE FACT THAT STEP 3 WAS MISLEADING I
`
`HADN'T -- I TOTALLY HADN'T NOTICED THAT SECOND SENTENCE THERE.
`
`Q
`
`OKAY.
`
`SO NOW NOTICING THE SECOND SENTENCE,
`
`I JUST WANT TO
`
`BE CLEAR FOR THE RECORD, YOU WANT TO RETRACT WHAT PART OF YOUR
`
`TESTIMONY?
`
`A
`
`THAT DESCRIPTION:
`
`BL3 DOWNLOAD AMSS FROM AP AND
`
`PARSE/SEGMENT IT APPROPRIATELY BEFORE PLACING IN THE DDR
`
`MEMORY.
`
`THAT WAS MISLEADING.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT PART BACK?
`
`YES.
`
`OKAY.
`
`LET'S GO TO PX110.
`
`IT'S ANOTHER DOCUMENT YOU WERE
`
`SHOWN ON CROSS-EXAMINATION.
`
`AND IF WE GO TO THE SECOND PAGE.
`
`AND THIS IS YOUR EMAIL TO MR. MUJTABA ON FEBRUARY 9 WHERE YOU
`
`LAY OUT FOR THE FIRST TIME YOUR STEP PROCEDURE.
`
`SO YOU WERE SHOWN THIS AND YOU WERE ASKED:
`
`DO YOU SEE THE
`
`WORD "SEPARATELY" ANYWHERE IN HERE?
`
`AND YOUR RESPONSE IS: WELL, STEPS 1 AND 3 HAVE TO BE DONE
`
`SEPARATELY.
`
`DO YOU REMEMBER THAT Q AND A?
`
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED AGAIN:
`
`YOU DON'T SEE THAT WORD
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`"SEPARATELY"
`
`IN HERE?
`
`SO WHY DO STEPS 1 AND 3 HAVE TO BE DONE SEPARATELY?
`
`A
`
`SO THE GOAL OF STEP 3 IS TO LOWER EACH SEGMENT INTO PLACE
`
`AND ON THE FLY.
`
`IF 1 TO 3 WERE DONE TOGETHER; I.E., NOT
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1145
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SO I'M RETRACTING THE FACT THAT STEP 3 WAS MISLEADING I
`A
`HADN'T -- I TOTALLY HADN'T NOTICED THAT SECOND SENTENCE THERE.
`Q
`OKAY. SO NOW NOTICING THE SECOND SENTENCE, I JUST WANT TO
`BE CLEAR FOR THE RECORD, YOU WANT TO RETRACT WHAT PART OF YOUR
`TESTIMONY?
`A
`THAT DESCRIPTION: BL3 DOWNLOAD AMSS FROM AP AND
`PARSE/SEGMENT IT APPROPRIATELY BEFORE PLACING IN THE DDR
`MEMORY. THAT WAS MISLEADING.
`Q
`YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT PART BACK?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`OKAY. LET'S GO TO PX110. IT'S ANOTHER DOCUMENT YOU WERE
`SHOWN ON CROSS-EXAMINATION. AND IF WE GO TO THE SECOND PAGE.
`AND THIS IS YOUR EMAIL TO MR. MUJTABA ON FEBRUARY 9 WHERE YOU
`LAY OUT FOR THE FIRST TIME YOUR STEP PROCEDURE.
`SO YOU WERE SHOWN THIS AND YOU WERE ASKED: DO YOU SEE THE
`WORD "SEPARATELY" ANYWHERE IN HERE?
`AND YOUR RESPONSE IS: WELL, STEPS 1 AND 3 HAVE TO BE DONE
`SEPARATELY.
`DO YOU REMEMBER THAT Q AND A?
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`A
`AND THEN YOU WERE ASKED AGAIN: YOU DON'T SEE THAT WORD
`Q
`"SEPARATELY" IN HERE?
`SO WHY DO STEPS 1 AND 3 HAVE TO BE DONE SEPARATELY?
`SO THE GOAL OF STEP 3 IS TO LOWER EACH SEGMENT INTO PLACE
`A
`AND ON THE FLY. IF 1 TO 3 WERE DONE TOGETHER; I.E., NOT
`
`

`

`1146
`
`SEPARATELY, THEN YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO IT ON THE FLY.
`
`YOU
`
`WOULD HAVE A COPY, RIGHT?
`
`SO THE ON—THE—FLY TERM WOULDN'T
`
`APPLY.
`
`Q
`
`AND IF WE —— YOU WEREN'T SHOWN THIS ON CROSS, BUT IF WE CAN
`
`GO DOWN TO THE BOTTOM THAT PARAGRAPH THAT YOU AND I TALKED
`
`ABOUT "WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT STAGED APPROACH IN THIS DOCUMENT."
`
`DO YOU SEE THAT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THERE WHEN YOU USED THE WORD
`
`"STAGED"?
`
`A
`
`THAT REFERS TO THE FIRST STEP WHERE THE AMSS ELF HEADER IS
`
`SENT OVER FIRST, THEN PROCESSED BY THE MODEM PROCESSOR, AND
`
`THEN EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL SEGMENTS ARE LOADED IN PLACE ON THE
`
`FLY.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`AND IS THAT THE SAME OR DIFFERENT THAN SAYING SEPARATELY?
`
`THE STAGED APPROACH IS THE SAME THING AS SAYING SEPARATE.
`
`THANK YOU.
`
`ONE MORE.
`
`YOU WERE SHOWN PX107 ON
`
`CROSS—EXAMINATION.
`
`YOU WERE ONLY ASKED ABOUT A COUPLE PLACES
`
`ON HERE, BUT LET'S PUT THIS IN CONTEXT.
`
`NOW THE DATE IS
`
`MARCH 18, 2010.
`
`SO THAT'S HOW LONG AFTER YOU HAD CONVEYED THIS
`
`STAGED APPROACH TO QUALCOMM?
`
`A
`
`SO I BELIEVE IT WAS THE 9TH OF FEB, SO LIKE QUITE A FEW
`
`DAYS, YEAH.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`A MONTH AND A WEEK?
`
`YEAH.
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1146
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SEPARATELY, THEN YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO IT ON THE FLY. YOU
`WOULD HAVE A COPY, RIGHT? SO THE ON-THE-FLY TERM WOULDN'T
`APPLY.
`Q
`AND IF WE -- YOU WEREN'T SHOWN THIS ON CROSS, BUT IF WE CAN
`GO DOWN TO THE BOTTOM THAT PARAGRAPH THAT YOU AND I TALKED
`ABOUT "WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT STAGED APPROACH IN THIS DOCUMENT."
`DO YOU SEE THAT?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THERE WHEN YOU USED THE WORD
`"STAGED"?
`A
`THAT REFERS TO THE FIRST STEP WHERE THE AMSS ELF HEADER IS
`SENT OVER FIRST, THEN PROCESSED BY THE MODEM PROCESSOR, AND
`THEN EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL SEGMENTS ARE LOADED IN PLACE ON THE
`FLY.
`Q
`AND IS THAT THE SAME OR DIFFERENT THAN SAYING SEPARATELY?
`A
`THE STAGED APPROACH IS THE SAME THING AS SAYING SEPARATE.
`Q
`THANK YOU. ONE MORE. YOU WERE SHOWN PX107 ON
`CROSS-EXAMINATION. YOU WERE ONLY ASKED ABOUT A COUPLE PLACES
`ON HERE, BUT LET'S PUT THIS IN CONTEXT. NOW THE DATE IS
`MARCH 18, 2010. SO THAT'S HOW LONG AFTER YOU HAD CONVEYED THIS
`STAGED APPROACH TO QUALCOMM?
`A
`SO I BELIEVE IT WAS THE 9TH OF FEB, SO LIKE QUITE A FEW
`DAYS, YEAH.
`Q
`A MONTH AND A WEEK?
`A
`YEAH.
`
`

`

`1147
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`PERHAPS?
`
`YEAH, YEAH.
`
`AND YOU'RE NOT ON THIS EMAIL;
`
`IS THAT RIGHT?
`
`I AM NOT ON THAT EMAIL.
`
`BUT YOU DID MENTION A MEETING WITH QUALCOMM WHERE IT DIDN'T
`
`GO SO WELL ——
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`-- ON DIRECT?
`
`SO THIS IS A FROM AN ISABEL MAHE?
`
`MAHE.
`
`SHE'S AT APPLE AT THIS POINT?
`
`YES.
`
`AND IT'S TO ARUN MATHIAS.
`
`AND WHO IS THAT?
`
`THAT WOULD BE A DIRECTOR AT APPLE.
`
`MY SKIP LEVEL BOSS.
`
`THERE'S A CC TO MR. MUJTABA AGAIN,
`
`I SEE?
`
`YES.
`
`AND ALSO ONE TO MR. ZHANG THAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT EARLIER;
`
`IS THAT RIGHT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`
`AND IT STARTS WITH:
`
`DOUBLE EXCLAMATION POINT.
`
`DISASTROUS
`
`MEETING WITH EUREKA TODAY ON FLASHLESS.
`
`AGAIN, WHO WAS EUREKA?
`
`EUREKA REFERS TO QUALCOMM.
`
`IF WE CAN GO DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DOCUMENT UNDER "HI,
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`ISABEL."
`
`LET'S BLOW UP THAT FIRST PARAGRAPH.
`
`SO THIS IS
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1147
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`PERHAPS?
`Q
`YEAH, YEAH.
`A
`AND YOU'RE NOT ON THIS EMAIL; IS THAT RIGHT?
`Q
`I AM NOT ON THAT EMAIL.
`A
`BUT YOU DID MENTION A MEETING WITH QUALCOMM WHERE IT DIDN'T
`Q
`GO SO WELL --
`A
`YES.
`Q
`-- ON DIRECT?
`SO THIS IS A FROM AN ISABEL MAHE?
`MAHE.
`A
`SHE'S AT APPLE AT THIS POINT?
`Q
`YES.
`A
`AND IT'S TO ARUN MATHIAS. AND WHO IS THAT?
`Q
`THAT WOULD BE A DIRECTOR AT APPLE. MY SKIP LEVEL BOSS.
`A
`THERE'S A CC TO MR. MUJTABA AGAIN, I SEE?
`Q
`YES.
`A
`AND ALSO ONE TO MR. ZHANG THAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT EARLIER;
`Q
`IS THAT RIGHT?
`A
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`Q
`AND IT STARTS WITH: DOUBLE EXCLAMATION POINT. DISASTROUS
`MEETING WITH EUREKA TODAY ON FLASHLESS.
`AGAIN, WHO WAS EUREKA?
`EUREKA REFERS TO QUALCOMM.
`A
`IF WE CAN GO DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DOCUMENT UNDER "HI,
`Q
`ISABEL." LET'S BLOW UP THAT FIRST PARAGRAPH. SO THIS IS
`
`

`

`1148
`
`MR. MATHIAS SAYING TO MS. MAHE:
`
`EUREKA, MEANING QUALCOMM, MADE
`
`A FOOL OUT OF US TODAY BY REFUSING TO TALK ABOUT ENGINEERING
`
`DETAILS OF THE SAHARA PROTOCOL FOR FLASHLESS, CITING IP
`
`CONCERNS.
`
`THE FACT THAT THEY TOLD THIS TO US ONE HOUR INTO THE
`
`MEETING WAS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE.
`
`THEY COULD HAVE SAID THIS
`
`TO US OVER THE PHONE EVEN BEFORE WE HAD FLOWN DOWN TO
`
`SAN DIEGO.
`
`EUREKA QUOTE "THINKS" UNQUOTE THAT THEY HAVE NEW IP TO
`
`DEVELOP FOR THIS SAHARA PROTOCOL AND DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS ANY
`
`TECHNICAL DETAILS WITH US UNTIL THEY HAVE AN IP AGREEMENT IN
`
`PLACE WHEREBY THEY CAN OWN ANY IDEAS/FEEDBACK WE GIVE THEM.
`
`IS THAT WHAT THIS EMAIL SAYS?
`
`YES.
`
`BUT YOU HAD ALREADY GIVEN QUALCOMM YOUR STAGED APPROACH
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`IDEA OVER A MONTH EARLIER; THAT IS RIGHT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`AND AT THIS POINT IN TIME, ON MARCH 18, 2010, YOU DIDN'T
`
`KNOW THAT FOUR DAYS LATER QUALCOMM WAS GOING TO GO DOWN TO THE
`
`PATENT OFFICE AND FILE A PATENT APPLICATION THAT WOULD TURN
`
`INTO THE '949 --
`
`MR. PAK: OBJECTION.
`
`LEADING.
`
`ARGUMENTATIVE, YOUR
`
`HONOR.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`SUSTAINED.
`
`MS. BROOKS:
`
`I'LL REPHRASE, YOUR HONOR.
`
`BY MS. BROOKS:
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1148
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`MR. MATHIAS SAYING TO MS. MAHE: EUREKA, MEANING QUALCOMM, MADE
`A FOOL OUT OF US TODAY BY REFUSING TO TALK ABOUT ENGINEERING
`DETAILS OF THE SAHARA PROTOCOL FOR FLASHLESS, CITING IP
`CONCERNS. THE FACT THAT THEY TOLD THIS TO US ONE HOUR INTO THE
`MEETING WAS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE. THEY COULD HAVE SAID THIS
`TO US OVER THE PHONE EVEN BEFORE WE HAD FLOWN DOWN TO
`SAN DIEGO.
`EUREKA QUOTE "THINKS" UNQUOTE THAT THEY HAVE NEW IP TO
`DEVELOP FOR THIS SAHARA PROTOCOL AND DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS ANY
`TECHNICAL DETAILS WITH US UNTIL THEY HAVE AN IP AGREEMENT IN
`PLACE WHEREBY THEY CAN OWN ANY IDEAS/FEEDBACK WE GIVE THEM.
`IS THAT WHAT THIS EMAIL SAYS?
`YES.
`A
`BUT YOU HAD ALREADY GIVEN QUALCOMM YOUR STAGED APPROACH
`Q
`IDEA OVER A MONTH EARLIER; THAT IS RIGHT?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`AND AT THIS POINT IN TIME, ON MARCH 18, 2010, YOU DIDN'T
`KNOW THAT FOUR DAYS LATER QUALCOMM WAS GOING TO GO DOWN TO THE
`PATENT OFFICE AND FILE A PATENT APPLICATION THAT WOULD TURN
`INTO THE '949 --
`MR. PAK: OBJECTION. LEADING. ARGUMENTATIVE, YOUR
`
`HONOR.
`
`THE COURT: SUSTAINED.
`MS. BROOKS: I'LL REPHRASE, YOUR HONOR.
`BY MS. BROOKS:
`
`

`

`1149
`
`Q
`
`DID YOU KNOW ON MARCH 18, 2010 AT THIS DISASTROUS MEETING
`
`THAT FOUR DAYS LATER, QUALCOMM WAS GOING TO GO DOWN TO THE
`
`PATENT OFFICE AND FILE A PATENT THAT TURNED INTO THE '949?
`
`A
`
`I DIDN'T KNOW.
`
`MS. BROOKS:
`
`THANK YOU.
`
`PASS THE WITNESS, YOUR HONOR.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`RECROSS.
`
`BY MR. PAK:
`
`Q
`
`LET'S BRING UP —— MAY I PROCEED, YOUR HONOR?
`
`THE COURT: YES.
`
`RECROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. PAK:
`
`Q
`
`I'LL GO BACK TO THE TESTIMONY YOU WERE SHOWN FROM YOUR
`
`DEPOSITION.
`
`PAGE 221.
`
`DO YOU RECALL COUNSEL ASKED YOU A
`
`NUMBER OF QUESTIONS OR ACTUALLY —— YEAH.
`
`IF YOU GO BACK BEFORE TO PAGE 220.
`
`SO PAGE 220, THERE'S
`
`SOME QUESTIONS THAT COUNSEL FOR APPLE ASKED YOU.
`
`
`DO YOU SEE IN
`
`THE MIDDLE OF THE PAGE, THERE'S A PARAGRAPH THAT STARTS WITH
`
`"QUALCOMM'S SOLUTION"?
`
`DO YOU SEE THAT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`THAT WAS APPLE'S LAWYER ASKING YOU THESE QUESTIONS AT THE
`
`DEPOSITION, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`I BELIEVE SO, OR I GUESS A LAWYER FROM WILMER HALE, WHICH I
`
`GUESS WAS REPRESENTING APPLE.
`
`Q
`
`RIGHT.
`
`AND HE SHOWED YOU THIS ONE PARAGRAPH FROM A BRIEF
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1149
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`DID YOU KNOW ON MARCH 18, 2010 AT THIS DISASTROUS MEETING
`Q
`THAT FOUR DAYS LATER, QUALCOMM WAS GOING TO GO DOWN TO THE
`PATENT OFFICE AND FILE A PATENT THAT TURNED INTO THE '949?
`A
`I DIDN'T KNOW.
`MS. BROOKS: THANK YOU.
`PASS THE WITNESS, YOUR HONOR.
`THE COURT: RECROSS.
`BY MR. PAK:
`Q
`LET'S BRING UP -- MAY I PROCEED, YOUR HONOR?
`THE COURT: YES.
`RECROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. PAK:
`Q
`I'LL GO BACK TO THE TESTIMONY YOU WERE SHOWN FROM YOUR
`DEPOSITION. PAGE 221. DO YOU RECALL COUNSEL ASKED YOU A
`NUMBER OF QUESTIONS OR ACTUALLY -- YEAH.
`IF YOU GO BACK BEFORE TO PAGE 220. SO PAGE 220, THERE'S
`SOME QUESTIONS THAT COUNSEL FOR APPLE ASKED YOU. DO YOU SEE IN
`THE MIDDLE OF THE PAGE, THERE'S A PARAGRAPH THAT STARTS WITH
`"QUALCOMM'S SOLUTION"? DO YOU SEE THAT?
`A
`YES.
`Q
`THAT WAS APPLE'S LAWYER ASKING YOU THESE QUESTIONS AT THE
`DEPOSITION, CORRECT?
`A
`I BELIEVE SO, OR I GUESS A LAWYER FROM WILMER HALE, WHICH I
`GUESS WAS REPRESENTING APPLE.
`Q
`RIGHT. AND HE SHOWED YOU THIS ONE PARAGRAPH FROM A BRIEF
`
`

`

` 1150
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`THAT QUALCOMM HAD FILED, CORRECT?
`A
`I'M SORRY. I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU MEAN BY "BRIEF," BUT I
`WAS SHOWN A DOCUMENT AND I READ A PARAGRAPH.
`Q
`YEAH. HE DIDN'T SHOW YOU THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT, DID HE?
`A
`NO.
`Q
`YOU'VE NEVER READ THAT ENTIRE DOCUMENT, HAD YOU?
`A
`NO.
`Q
`AND YOU HADN'T READ THE PATENT, CORRECT?
`A
`NO.
`Q
`YOU HADN'T LOOKED AT THE CLAIMS, CORRECT?
`A
`NO.
`Q
`AND I WANT TO HAND YOU PX2861.
`MR. PAK: YOUR HONOR, IF I MAY APPROACH?
`THE COURT: YES.
`MS. BROOKS: MIGHT WE HAVE A COPY, YOUR HONOR?
`MR. PAK: OF COURSE.
`THE COURT: YES.
`MS. BROOKS: THANK YOU.
`BY MR. PAK:
`Q
`SO TURN TO 63 -- OR PAGE 566 OF THIS DOCUMENT, WHICH IS PX
`2861.63.
`A
`DID YOU SAY "63"?
`Q
`YES. THAT'S THE NUMBER ON THE RIGHT-HAND, BUT THE MIDDLE
`NUMBER WILL BE 56. IT'S ON THE SCREEN AS WELL. ARE YOU WITH
`ME, MR. SIVA?
`
`

`

`1151
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YEAH.
`
`THIS IS A BRIEF —— WHAT WE CALL A BRIEF IS A LEGAL
`
`FILING —— BY QUALCOMM.
`
`IT'S GOT 78 PAGES.
`
`YOU WEREN'T SHOWN
`
`THIS DOCUMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`NO.
`
`APPLE'S LAWYER FOCUSED YOU ON THIS ONE PARAGRAPH IN
`
`ISOLATION, CORRECT, DURING YOUR DEPOSITION?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`THAT'S WHAT I RECALL.
`
`BUT THEN, LOOK AT THE VERY NEXT PARAGRAPH.
`
`DO YOU SEE THE
`
`CLAIM 16 LANGUAGE IS REPRODUCED IN THIS BRIEF?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I SEE THAT PARAGRAPH.
`
`HE NEVER ASKED YOU ABOUT THAT CLAIM?
`
`HE NEVER SHOWED YOU
`
`THAT CLAIM LANGUAGE, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`AGAIN,
`
`I DIDN'T READ IT EITHER.
`
`RIGHT.
`
`THAT'S RIGHT.
`
`SO EVEN TODAY, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT
`
`THE CLAIM ACTUALLY SAYS, CORRECT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I DO NOT.
`
`AND THEN LET'S GO BACK TO PX107.
`
`BACK TO THE BINDER, RIGHT?
`
`YES, BACK TO THE BINDER.
`
`COUNSEL ASKED YOU ABOUT THIS
`
`EXHIBIT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`YES.
`
`AND DO YOU SEE IT SAYS:
`
`IP AGREEMENT IN PLACE WHEREBY THEY
`
`CAN OWN ANY IDEAS/FEEDBACK WE GIVE THEM.
`
`IP CONCERNS.
`
`DO YOU
`
`SEE ALL THOSE REFERENCES TO IP CONCE

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket