IPR2018-00952
`Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00952
`Patent No. 9,253,239
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00952
`Patent No. 9,253,239
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`Exhibit Description
`2001 USPTO Public PAIR screen capture for Correspondence Address
`and Attorney/Agent Information for Application No. 14/547,148
`(’239 Patent)
`2002 Notice of Acceptance of Power of Attorney, Date Mailed
`03/11/2016, for Application No. 14/547,148 (’293 Patent)
`2003 Declaration of Michael N. Zachary in Support of Patent Owner’s
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`2004 PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL: Transcript of Deposition of
`Unified Patents CEO, Kevin Jakel dated September 10, 2018
`2005 Team, Unified Patents, https://www.unifiedpatents.com/team/#
`2006
`Join, Unified Patents, https://www.unifiedpatents.com/join/
`2007
`Join, Unified Patents (May 17, 2018),
`https://web.archive.org/web/20180517015601/https://www.unifiedp
`atents.com/join/
`2008 PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL: Unified Patents Membership
`Agreement
`2009 PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL: Exhibit A: Subscription Form
`Internet of Things (IoT) Zone
`2010 Belcher, Marta, et al., “Hacking the Patent System: A guide to
`Alternative Patent Licensing for Innovators,” Juelsgaard Intellectual
`Property & Innovation Clinic Stanford Law School, dated May 2014
`2011 Protected Zones, Excerpt of United Patents (Oct. 27, 2016),
`https://web.archive.org/web/20161027135832/http://www.unifiedpat
`ents.com:80/zones/
`2012 U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239, “Optimized Image Delivery Over
`Limited Bandwidth Communication Channels,” issued Feb. 2, 2016
`(“’239 Patent”) (Not filed)
`2013 PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL: Petitioner’s Voluntary
`Interrogatory Response
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`
`Exhibit Description
`2014 Bradium Technologies LLC, Unified Patents (August 3, 2015),
`https://web.archive.org/web/20150803044103/http://bradiumtechnol
`ogies.com/
`2015 Docket Navigator of Unified Patents dated Jun. 17, 2015
`2016 Bradium Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corp., Complaint, filed
`Jan. 9, 2015
`2017 Bradium Technologies and Microsoft Settle Patent Lawsuit,
`Bradium Technologies (Oct. 17, 2017),
`http://www.bradiumtechnologies.com/bradium/bradium-
`technologies-and-microsoft-settle-patent-lawsuit
`2018 Unified Patents, backed by Google, takes fight to patent trolls, Don
`Reisinger, CNET (Apr. 8, 2013)
`2019 Don Clark, New Venture Enters Patent Fray, Wall Street Journal,
`published Apr. 7, 2013
`2020 The Gloves are Off: Unified Patents Inc. Unveils Its ‘NPE
`Deterrent’ Strategy, Unified Patents (September 23, 2013),
`http://justdemo. in/unified/2013/09/23/the-gloves-are-off-unified-
`patents-inc-unveils-its-npe-deterrent-strategy//
`2021 Unified Patents Challenges Clouding IP Patent Seeks to Push Patent
`Trolls Out of Cloud Storage, Unified Patents (September 23, 2013),
`http://unifiedpatents.com/2013/09/23 unified-patents-challenges-
`clouding-ip-patent-seeks-to-push-patent-trolls-out-of-cloud-storage/
`2022 Unified has challenged almost all of 2017’s most prolific NPEs,
`United Patents (Jul. 5, 2017),
`https://www.unifiedpatents.com/news/2017/7/5/according-to-rpx-
`datea-has-challenged-almost-all-of-2017s-most-prolific-npes
`2023 Email from Unified Patents to Michael Zachary re “Unified reaches
`100 challenges,” dated Nov. 15, 2017
`2024 Unified Patents (January 1, 2014),
`https://web.archive.org/web/20140101033720/http://unifiedpatents.c
`om/
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`2029
`
`
`Exhibit Description
`2025 Eric Coe, Unified Patents Adds AIA Reviews to Anti-‘Troll’ Arsenal,
`Law360 (Jun. 23, 2015),
`https://www.law360.com/articles/668619/print?section=ip
`2026 Declaration of C. Coulson in support of Bradium Technologies
`LLC’s Preliminary Patent Owner’s Response
`2027 Bradium Technologies LLC’s Disclaimer of Claims 1-19, 21-25
`2028 Orthogonality, Wikipedia,
`https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonality
`IPRs, Balancing Effectiveness vs. Cost, RPX (June 17, 2016)
`https://www.rpxcorp.com/2016/06/17/iprs-balancing-effectiveness-
`vs-cost/
`2030 How Much does IPR Cost?, Patent Trademark Blog,
`http://www.patenttrademarkblog.com/how-much-does-ipr-cost/
`2031 Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Techs. LLC, IPR2016-01897 (U.S. Pat.
`No. 9,253,239), Paper 2 (Petition) (P.T.A.B. Sept. 30, 2016)
`2032 Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Techs. LLC, IPR2016-01897 (U.S. Pat.
`No. 9,253,239), Paper 17 (Institution Decision) (P.T.A.B. April 5,
`2017)
`2033 NPE Zones: Deter bad NPE conduct, Unified Patents (Sept. 20,
`2018), https://www.unifiedpatents.com/npe/
`2034 Bradium Technologies LLC v Iancu, No. 17-2579, USPTO
`Director’s Opposition to Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File
`Supplemental Brief, Dkt No. 74 (Filed Sept. 4, 2018)
`2035 Declaration of L. Quan in support of Bradium Technologies LLC’s
`Preliminary Patent Owner’s Response
`“Summary of Findings: Search Results Using Unified Patents
`Portal,” prepared by L. Quan.
`2037 Declaration of M. Shanahan in support of Bradium Technologies
`LLC’s Preliminary Patent Owner’s Response
`2038 Unified’s Real-Party-in-Interest PTAB Panel Decisions, Unified
`Patents (July 5, 2016), https://www.unifiedpatents.com/news/real-
`party-in-interest-panel-decisions
`
`2036
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`
`Exhibit Description
`2039 Belcher, Marta, et al., “Hacking the Patent System: A guide to
`Alternative Patent Licensing for Innovators,” Juelsgaard Intellectual
`Property & Innovation Clinic Stanford Law School, updated January
`2016
`2040 PDF Copy of https://www.unifiedpatents.com/join/ (downloaded
`October 9, 2018)
`2041 PDF Copy of https://www.unifiedpatents.com/join-1/ (downloaded
`October 9, 2018) (not filed)
`2042 Declaration of C. Coulson (not filed)
`2043 Declaration of L. Quan (not filed)
`2044 Transcript of Deposition of Christopher K. Wilson (March 8, 2019)
`2045 Wilson Deposition Ex. 2038: Unified Patents Inc. v. Location Based
`Services, LLC, IPR2017-01965, Declaration of Christopher K.
`Wilson (Excerpted)
`2046 Wilson Deposition Ex. 2039: U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2012/0095682
`2047 Wilson Deposition Ex. 2040: U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2002/0014979
`2048 Notarized Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Internet Archive
`(www.archive.org), dated November 27, 2018
`2049 Exhibits to Notarized Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Exhibit A
`(Unified Patents “Join” Webpage) and Exhibit B (Belcher, Marta, et
`al., “Hacking the Patent System: A guide to Alternative Patent
`Licensing for Innovators,” Juelsgaard Intellectual Property &
`Innovation Clinic Stanford Law School, updated January 2016)
`2050 Dec. 8, 2016 J. Lasker Letter to M. Shanahan
`2051
`June 17, 1996 FlashPix Format and Architecture White Paper
`2052 Application No. 15/457,816, Oct. 4, 2017 Non-Final Rejection, IDS,
`List of References
`2053 Application No. 15/457,816, Oct. 4, 2018 Final Rejection
`2054 Declaration of Dr. Agouris in Support of Patent Owner Response
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit Description
`2055 Declaration of Dr. Agouris in Support of Contingent Motion to
`Amend
`2056 Declaration of Jessika Sprague in Support of Patent Owner
`Response
`“Summary of Findings: Search Results Using Unified Patents
`Portal,” prepared by J. Sprague
`2058 PDF copy of
`https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/caselist?patent_owners=bradiu
`m (downloaded April 1, 2019)
`2059 Second Declaration of Dr. Agouris in Support of Contingent Motion
`to Amend
`2060 Patent Owner’s Demonstratives
`
`Dated: September 13, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Michael N. Zachary (pro hac vice)
` BUNSOW DE MORY LLP
`701 El Camino Real
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Tel.: (650) 351-7248
`mzachary@bdiplaw.com
`
` Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`2057
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`/Chris J. Coulson/
`Chris J. Coulson (Reg. No. 61,771)
`BUNSOW DE MORY LLP
`101 Brambach Rd.
`Scarsdale, NY 10583
`Tel.: (646) 502-6973
`ccoulson@bdiplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on September
`
`13, 2019, the foregoing Patent Owner’s Updated Exhibit List was served via
`
`electronic mail upon the following counsel of record for the Petitioner:
`
`Roshan Suresh Mansinghani (Reg. No. 62,429)
`Unified Patents Inc.
`13355 Noel Road, Suite 1100
`Dallas, TX 75240
`Tel: (214) 945-0200
`Email: roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Alyssa J. Holtslander (Reg. No. 64,026)
`Jonathan Stroud (Reg. No. 72,518)
`Unified Patents Inc.
`1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 10
`Washington, DC 20009
`Tel: (202) 750-3605
`Email: alyssa@unifiedpatents.com
`Email: jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`David L. Cavanaugh (Reg. No. 36,476)
`Daniel V. Williams (Reg. No. 45,221)
`Jonathan E. Robe (Reg. No. 76,033)
`WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE AND DORR, LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 663-6000
`Email: David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`Email: Daniel.Williams@wilmerhale.com
`Email: Jonathan.Robe@Wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent No. 9,253,239
`
`/Chris J. Coulson/
`Chris J. Coulson (Reg. No. 61,771)
`BUNSOW DE MORY LLP
`101 Brambach Rd.
`Scarsdale, NY 10583
`Tel.: (646) 502-6973
`ccoulson@bdiplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
