`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`VISA INC., and VISA U.S.A. INC.,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`Case IPR2018-008131
`U.S. Patent No. 9,100,826
`________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER APPLE INC.’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`1 Visa Inc. and Visa U.S.A. Inc., which filed a petition in IPR2019-00176, have
`
`been joined as a party to this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`U.S. Patent No. 9,100,826
`Petitioner Apple’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s November 8, 2018 Scheduling Order (Paper No.
`
`10), Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Apple”) respectfully requests oral argument currently
`
`scheduled on July 16, 2019. Petitioner requests the ability to use a computer,
`
`projector, and screen to display possible demonstratives and exhibits. Petitioner
`
`requests 60 minutes per side.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Apple specifies the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`I. Whether challenged claims 1, 2, 10, 11, 21, 22, 24, 27, 30, and 31 are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and 102(e) as anticipated by
`
`the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104).
`
`II. Whether challenged claims 7, 14, 26, and 34 are unpatentable under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104),
`
`Verbauwhede (Ex. 1107), and Maritzen (Ex. 1105).
`
`III. Whether challenged claims 8 and 15 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a) as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104) and Gullman
`
`(Ex. 1106).
`
`IV. Respond to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Response (Paper
`
`18) and Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply (Paper No. 30).
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`U.S. Patent No. 9,100,826
`Petitioner Apple’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`V. Whether substitute claims 36-37 and 45-46 are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104) and
`
`Schutzer (Ex. 1130).
`
`VI. Whether substitute claims 42 and 49 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a) as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104), Schutzer (Ex.
`
`1130), Verbauwhede (Ex. 1107), and Maritzen (Ex. 1105).
`
`VII. Whether substitute claims 56 and 57 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a) as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104) and Burnett
`
`(Ex. 1121).
`
`VIII. Whether substitute claim 60 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`as obvious over the ’585 reference (Ex. 1104), Burnett (Ex. 1121),
`
`Verbauwhede (Ex. 1107), and Maritzen (Ex. 1105).
`
`IX. Whether substitute claims 36-60 are unpatentable as drawn to
`
`ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
`
`X. Whether substitute claim 56 satisfies 35 U.S.C § 112.
`
`XI. Whether Patent Owner’s Conditional Motion to Amend (Paper No.
`
`19) should be denied for proposing an unreasonable number of claims
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a)(3).
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`U.S. Patent No. 9,100,826
`Petitioner Apple’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`XII. Whether Patent Owner’s Conditional Motion to Amend (Paper No.
`
`19) should be denied for failing to comply with 35 U.S.C. § 316(d)(1)
`
`by substituting claims 38-41, 44, 47, 48, 51-55, 58, 59, and 61 for
`
`unchallenged claims 3-6, 9, 12, 13, 16-20, 32, 33, 35.
`
`XIII. Whether Patent Owner has complied with its duty of candor under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.11.
`
`XIV. Respond to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Reply (Paper No.
`
`31) to Petitioner’s Conditional Motion to Amend Opposition.
`
`XV. Respond to Patent Owner’s Motion to Strike (Paper No. 34) and any
`
`arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply to Petitioner’s
`
`Opposition to the Motion to Strike (to be filed).
`
`XVI. Respond to Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude, if one is submitted.
`
`XVII. Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument.
`
`XVIII. Respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`XIX. Any arguments raised by the Parties in their respective papers,
`
`motions, oppositions, responses, replies, and sur-replies.
`
`XX.
`
`Issues related to the Board’s Decision on Institution and the grounds
`
`instituted in the Decision.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`U.S. Patent No. 9,100,826
`Petitioner Apple’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`XXI. Any issues raised in the briefing pursuant to the schedule.
`
`XXII. Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Date: June 10, 2019
`
`/Monica Grewal/
`
`Monica Grewal
`Registration No. 40,056
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`U.S. Patent No. 9,100,826
`Petitioner Apple’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on June 10, 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of
`
`Petitioner Apple’s Request for Oral Argument to be served via electronic mail on
`
`the following correspondents of record as listed in Patent Owners’ Mandatory
`
`Notices and Paper 33:
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`James M. Glass (jimglass@quinnemanuel.com)
`Tigran Guledjian (tigranguledjian@quinnemanuel.com)
`Christopher A. Mathews (chrismathews@quinnemanuel.com)
`Nima Hefazi (nimahefazi@quinnemanuel.com)
`Richard Lowry (richardlowry@quinnemanuel.com)
`Razmig Messerian (razmesserian@quinnemanuel.com)
`Jordan B. Kaericher (jordankaericher@quinnemanuel.com)
`Harold A. Barza (halbarza@quinnemanuel.com)
`Quinn Emanuel USR IPR (qe-usr-ipr@quinnemanuel.com)
`QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`For PETITIONER:
`(IPR2019-00176):
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`Date: June 10, 2019
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Monica Grewal/
`Monica Grewal
`Registration No. 40,056
`
`5
`
`