`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`_______________
`
`
`SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`CREE, INC., AND EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2018-003331
`Patent 7,256,486 B2
`
`_______________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`1 Cree, Inc., who filed a Petition in IPR2018-01205, and Everlight Electronics Co.,
`Ltd., who filed a Petition in IPR2018-01225, have been joined as petitioners in this
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Semiconductor, Inc.,
`Cree, Inc., and Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
`v.
`Document Security Systems, Inc.
`
`IPR2018-003331 (USP 7,256,486 B2)
`
`Oral Hearing Date: January 31, 2019
`
`Before Hon. Sally C. Medley, Scott C. Moore, and Brent M. Dougal,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`___________________________________
`1Cree, Inc., who filed a Petition in IPR2018-01205, and Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd., who filed a
`Petition in IPR2018-01225, have been joined as petitioners in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`Summary of Asserted Grounds and Prior Art
`
`Ground
`1
`1
`2
`
`Reference[s]
`Rohm
`Rohm and Kish
`Matsushita and Edmond ’589
`
`Claims challenged
`1-3
`1-3
`1-3
`
` Japanese Pat. Pub. 2003-17754, Jan. 17, 2003 (Ex. 1008) (“Rohm”)
`
` U.S. 5,376,580, Dec. 27, 1994 (Ex. 1010) (“Kish”)
`
` Japanese Pat. Pub. 2001-352102, Dec. 21, 2001 (Ex. 1009) (“Matsushita”)
`
` U.S. Patent 5,523,589, June 4, 1996 (Ex. 1011) (“Edmond ’589”)
`
`Paper 8, p. 2
`
`
`
`3DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Overview of Issues
`
`Issue
`
`Ground Claims
`
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Bottom Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Top Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Bottom Major Surface?
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Top Major Surface?
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,256,486 B2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 1, 12:6‐39
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 3;
`Paper 17, p. 3
`
`’486 Figure 2A
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 17, p. 3
`
`’486 Figure 2B
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 17, p. 4
`
`’486 Figure 2B (annotated)
`
`
`
`’486 Figure 2B (2nd annotated)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 17, p. 5
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Proposed Petitioner’s Proposed
`
`Claim Construction Omits “Major”Claim Construction Omits “Major”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`Pet., p. 10;
`Paper 17, p. 9
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`Issue #1:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Bottom Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`1
`
`1
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 19-27, 32-33;
`Paper 17, pp. 12-17, 28-29.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`Issue #2:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Top Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 28-33;
`Paper 17, pp. 21-25, 28-29.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`Exhibit 1008, p. 6;
`Paper 17, p. 10
`
`
`
`Rohm’s Figs. 1 and 3Rohm’s Figs. 1 and 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Rohm’s Fig. 1 (annotated)Rohm’s Fig. 1 (annotated)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`Pet., p. 29;
`Paper 17, p. 11
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`Exhibit 2003, 13:1‐2;
`Paper 17, pp. 16, 23, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`Exhibit 2003, 25:20‐26:15;
`Paper 17, p. 17
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`Exhibit 1010, pp. 4, 7;
`Paper 17, pp. 13‐14
`
`KishKish
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`Exhibit 2003, 50:19‐51:10;
`Paper 17, pp. 15, 30
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`Exhibit 2003, 66:14‐19;
`Paper 17, pp. 15, 30
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`Exhibit 2003, 69:2‐11;
`Paper 17, pp. 15, 30
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`Exhibit 2003, 58:12‐59:8;
`Paper 17, p. 15
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`Exhibit 2003, 61:15‐62:7;
`Paper 17, p. 16
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`Exhibit 2003, 58:12‐21;
`Paper 17, p. 16
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`Exhibit 2003, 69:22‐70:4;
`Paper 17, pp. 16, 23, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`Exhibit 1003, ¶49;
`Paper 17, p. 16
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`Exhibit 2003, 33:12‐17;
`Paper 17, p. 17
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`Exhibit 2003, 34:21‐35:3;
`Paper 17, p. 17
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`Exhibit 2003, 36:9‐37:5;
`Paper 17, p. 17
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`Exhibit 2003, 39:17‐40:5;
`Paper 17, p. 17
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`Claim 2: Kish Does Not Remedy
`Rohm’s Shortcomings
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`Pet., pp. 29‐30;
`Paper 17, pp. 21‐22
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`Exhibit 2003, 14:9‐15:9;
`Paper 17, p. 23;
`Paper 24, p. 6
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`Exhibit 2003, 21:11‐19;
`Paper 17, pp. 24, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`Exhibit 2003, 22:4‐16;
`Paper 17, pp. 24, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`Issue #3:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Bottom Major Surface?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`2
`
`1
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 33-43, 50-51;
`Paper 17, pp. 29-31, 39-40.
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`Issue #4:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Top Major Surface?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`2
`
`2
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 43-51;
`Paper 17, pp. 34-37, 39-40.
`
`
`
`
`
`Matsushita’s Fig. 2 (highlighted)Matsushita’s Fig. 2 (highlighted)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`Paper 17, p. 33
`
`
`
`
`
`Matsushita and Edmond ’589Matsushita and Edmond ’589
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`(annotated Matsushita’s Fig. 2)
`
`(annotated Edmond ’589’s Fig. 1)
`
`Pet., p. 45;
`Paper 17, p. 35
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`Exhibit 2003, 45:18‐46:2;
`Paper 17, p. 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on January 29, 2019, a true and correct copy of the
`
`
`
`foregoing Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibits was served via email, by consent,
`
`to Petitioners by serving the correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Michael Eisenberg (Reg. No. 50,643)
`michael.eisenberg@hklaw.com
`31 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 513-3529
`Facsimile: (212) 385-9010
`Charles H. Sanders (Reg. No. 47,053)
`charles.sanders@lw.com
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`200 Clarendon Street
`Boston, MA 02116
`Jonathan M. Strang (Reg. No. 61,724)
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, NW, Ste. 1000
`Washington, DC 20004-1304
`
`John F. Rabena (Reg. No. 38,584)
`jrabena@sughrue.com
`William H. Mandir (Reg. No. 32,156)
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
`2100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20037
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Blaney Harper (Reg. No. 33,897)
`bharper@jonesday.com
`Douglas H. Pearson (Reg. No. 47,851)
`dhpearson@jonesday.com
`Yury Kalish (Reg. No. 72,538)
`ykalish@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`51 Louisiana Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001
`Matthew W. Johnson (Reg. No. 59,108)
`mwjohnsone@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`500 Grant Street, Suite 4500
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219
`Joseph M. Sauer (Reg. No. 47,919)
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`
`
` By: /s/ Wayne M. Helge
`
`Registration No. 56,905
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`