throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`_______________
`
`
`SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`CREE, INC., AND EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2018-003331
`Patent 7,256,486 B2
`
`_______________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`1 Cree, Inc., who filed a Petition in IPR2018-01205, and Everlight Electronics Co.,
`Ltd., who filed a Petition in IPR2018-01225, have been joined as petitioners in this
`proceeding.
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Seoul Semiconductor, Inc.,
`Cree, Inc., and Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
`v.
`Document Security Systems, Inc.
`
`IPR2018-003331 (USP 7,256,486 B2)
`
`Oral Hearing Date: January 31, 2019
`
`Before Hon. Sally C. Medley, Scott C. Moore, and Brent M. Dougal,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`___________________________________
`1Cree, Inc., who filed a Petition in IPR2018-01205, and Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd., who filed a
`Petition in IPR2018-01225, have been joined as petitioners in this proceeding.
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`Summary of Asserted Grounds and Prior Art
`
`Ground
`1
`1
`2
`
`Reference[s]
`Rohm
`Rohm and Kish
`Matsushita and Edmond ’589
`
`Claims challenged
`1-3
`1-3
`1-3
`
` Japanese Pat. Pub. 2003-17754, Jan. 17, 2003 (Ex. 1008) (“Rohm”)
`
` U.S. 5,376,580, Dec. 27, 1994 (Ex. 1010) (“Kish”)
`
` Japanese Pat. Pub. 2001-352102, Dec. 21, 2001 (Ex. 1009) (“Matsushita”)
`
` U.S. Patent 5,523,589, June 4, 1996 (Ex. 1011) (“Edmond ’589”)
`
`Paper 8, p. 2
`
`

`

`3DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Overview of Issues
`
`Issue
`
`Ground Claims
`
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Bottom Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Top Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Bottom Major Surface?
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Top Major Surface?
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,256,486 B2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 1, 12:6‐39 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 3;
`Paper 17, p. 3 
`
`’486 Figure 2A
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 17, p. 3 
`
`’486 Figure 2B
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 17, p. 4 
`
`’486 Figure 2B (annotated)
`
`

`

`’486 Figure 2B (2nd annotated)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 17, p. 5 
`
`

`

`
`Petitioner’s Proposed Petitioner’s Proposed
`
`Claim Construction Omits “Major”Claim Construction Omits “Major”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`Pet., p. 10;
`Paper 17, p. 9 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`Issue #1:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Bottom Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`1
`
`1
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 19-27, 32-33;
`Paper 17, pp. 12-17, 28-29.
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`Issue #2:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Rohm Disclose or Suggest a Light Emitting Diode Having a Metallized
`Top Major Surface, and Does Kish Remedy Rohm’s Shortcomings?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 28-33;
`Paper 17, pp. 21-25, 28-29.
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`Exhibit 1008, p. 6;
`Paper 17, p. 10 
`
`
`
`Rohm’s Figs. 1 and 3Rohm’s Figs. 1 and 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Rohm’s Fig. 1 (annotated)Rohm’s Fig. 1 (annotated)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`Pet., p. 29;
`Paper 17, p. 11 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`Exhibit 2003, 13:1‐2;
`Paper 17, pp. 16, 23, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`Exhibit 2003, 25:20‐26:15;
`Paper 17, p. 17 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`Exhibit 1010, pp. 4, 7;
`Paper 17, pp. 13‐14 
`
`KishKish
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`Exhibit 2003, 50:19‐51:10;
`Paper 17, pp. 15, 30 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`Exhibit 2003, 66:14‐19;
`Paper 17, pp. 15, 30 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`Exhibit 2003, 69:2‐11;
`Paper 17, pp. 15, 30 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`Exhibit 2003, 58:12‐59:8;
`Paper 17, p. 15 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`Exhibit 2003, 61:15‐62:7;
`Paper 17, p. 16 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`Exhibit 2003, 58:12‐21;
`Paper 17, p. 16 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`Exhibit 2003, 69:22‐70:4;
`Paper 17, pp. 16, 23, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`Exhibit 1003, ¶49;
`Paper 17, p. 16 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`Exhibit 2003, 33:12‐17;
`Paper 17, p. 17 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`Exhibit 2003, 34:21‐35:3;
`Paper 17, p. 17 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`Exhibit 2003, 36:9‐37:5;
`Paper 17, p. 17 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`Exhibit 2003, 39:17‐40:5;
`Paper 17, p. 17 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`Claim 2: Kish Does Not Remedy
`Rohm’s Shortcomings
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`Pet., pp. 29‐30;
`Paper 17, pp. 21‐22 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`Exhibit 2003, 14:9‐15:9;
`Paper 17, p. 23;
`Paper 24, p. 6 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`Exhibit 2003, 21:11‐19;
`Paper 17, pp. 24, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`Exhibit 2003, 22:4‐16;
`Paper 17, pp. 24, 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`Issue #3:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Bottom Major Surface?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`2
`
`1
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 33-43, 50-51;
`Paper 17, pp. 29-31, 39-40.
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`Issue #4:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Matsushita in view of Edmond ’589 Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Top Major Surface?
`
`Ground Claims
`
`2
`
`2
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Pet., pp. 43-51;
`Paper 17, pp. 34-37, 39-40.
`
`

`

`
`
`Matsushita’s Fig. 2 (highlighted)Matsushita’s Fig. 2 (highlighted)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`Paper 17, p. 33 
`
`

`

`
`
`Matsushita and Edmond ’589Matsushita and Edmond ’589
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`(annotated Matsushita’s Fig. 2)
`
`(annotated Edmond ’589’s Fig. 1)
`
`Pet., p. 45;
`Paper 17, p. 35 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`Exhibit 2003, 45:18‐46:2;
`Paper 17, p. 36;
`Paper 24, p. 6 
`
`Dr. Pecht’s Testimony
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on January 29, 2019, a true and correct copy of the
`
`
`
`foregoing Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibits was served via email, by consent,
`
`to Petitioners by serving the correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Michael Eisenberg (Reg. No. 50,643)
`michael.eisenberg@hklaw.com
`31 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 513-3529
`Facsimile: (212) 385-9010
`Charles H. Sanders (Reg. No. 47,053)
`charles.sanders@lw.com
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`200 Clarendon Street
`Boston, MA 02116
`Jonathan M. Strang (Reg. No. 61,724)
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, NW, Ste. 1000
`Washington, DC 20004-1304
`
`John F. Rabena (Reg. No. 38,584)
`jrabena@sughrue.com
`William H. Mandir (Reg. No. 32,156)
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
`2100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20037
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Blaney Harper (Reg. No. 33,897)
`bharper@jonesday.com
`Douglas H. Pearson (Reg. No. 47,851)
`dhpearson@jonesday.com
`Yury Kalish (Reg. No. 72,538)
`ykalish@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`51 Louisiana Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001
`Matthew W. Johnson (Reg. No. 59,108)
`mwjohnsone@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`500 Grant Street, Suite 4500
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219
`Joseph M. Sauer (Reg. No. 47,919)
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`901 Lakeside Ave.
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`
`
` By: /s/ Wayne M. Helge
`
`Registration No. 56,905
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket