throbber
Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`74
`
`Evangelio et al
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`tubulincolchicine
`
`Microtubules
`are essential
`for
`the organization
`cytoplasmic transport motility and division of eukary
`otic cells In addition they are targets of antimitotic
`drugs including colchicine vinblastine and taxol Wil
`son and Jordan 19941 Tubulin was discovered
`as a
`colchicine binding protein that assembled to form micro
`tubules Taylor 1965 Wilson and Friedkin 1966 Weisen
`berg et al 1968 Weisenberg 1972 Lee and Timasheff
`19751 However
`the use of colchicine derivatives to
`visualize microtubules has been very limited Clark and
`Garland 1978 Moll et al 19821 since the
`complex inhibits the assembly and dynamics
`of microtubules by binding to their ends Panda et al
`19951 On the contrary taxol an antitumor drug is an
`inducer of microtubule assembly Schiff et al 1979
`19801 and a stabilizing inhibitor of microtubule dynamics
`that binds to the microtubule wall Parness and Horwitz
`1981 Horwitz
`1992 Derry
`et al 19951 Taxol
`is
`considered to bind to cellular microtubules Manfredi et
`targets Wolf
`al 19821 although it may have additional
`son et al 19971 C De Ines and I Barasoain unpub
`lished observations Until now taxol binding has not
`been efficiently visualized
`Taxol
`induces microtubule formation by binding
`preferentially to assembled rather than to unassembled
`tubulin Parness and Horwitz 1981 Carlier and Panta
`loni 19831 The binding of exactly one molecule of taxol
`per o43tubulin dimer polymerized completely bypasses
`the requirement of the y phosphate of bound GTP for
`assembly Diaz and Andreu 19931 Specific
`tubulin
`labeling with azidotaxol derivatives has
`photoaffinity
`the N terminal 31
`mapped
`taxolbinding sequences
`residues and at positions 217231 of the 13 subunit Rao
`et al 1994 19951 The low resolution structures of
`microtubules in solution show that taxolinduced microtu
`bules have on average one protofilament
`less than is
`found in microtubules assembled with glycerol microtu
`buleassociated proteins or docetaxel Andreu et al
`1992 19941 Taxol binding also induces a 35 lengthen
`ing of the 4nm axial spacing between tubulin monomers
`along protofilaments Vale et al 1994 Arnal and Wade
`19951 and modifies the flexibility of microtubules Dye et
`al 1993 Venier et al 1994 Mickey et al 19951 From
`structural Andreu et al 19921 thermodynamic Diaz et
`and kinetic studies of
`the intermediates of
`al 19931
`taxoidinduced microtubule assembly Diaz et al 19961
`we have proposed that taxol binding 1 modifies the
`bules possibly by binding between protofilaments 2
`switches GDPtubulin from the inactive to the assembling
`conformation and 3 probably induces the lateral accre
`tion of tubulin oligomers transforming them into active
`
`at
`
`lateral interactions between tubulin molecules in microtu
`
`microtubule nucleating species The mid resolution struc
`ture of tubulin in zinc induced sheets has shown a single
`located
`taxol binding site per dimer
`approximately
`between the protofilaments Nogales et al 1995 Wolff et
`al 19961 however
`the antiparallel orientation of these
`protofilaments relative to microtubules precludes deduc
`in microtubules
`ing from these data the position of taxol
`It can be expected that
`in analogy to fluorescent
`derivatives of phalloidin Wulf et al 1979 widely
`employed to study actin microfilaments fluorescent taxol
`derivatives could be extremely useful
`to study cellular
`as well as the mechanisms of microtubule
`microtubules
`assembly and stabilization by taxol The complex chemis
`try of taxol Kingston 1994 Nicolaou and Guy 19951
`made difficult obtaining watersoluble significantly active
`derivatives labeled with appropriate fluorescent groups
`but this was recently accomplished Souto et al 19951 In
`the present work we have used fluorescent taxoids with
`and selectivity
`to probe the taxol
`adequate
`affinity
`binding site of in vitro assembled and cellular microtu
`bules Cytoplasmic microtubules mitotic spindles and
`centrosomes
`are directly and specifically visualized and
`
`studied with fluorescent taxoids
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Fluorescent Taxoids and Other Materials
`
`70 N4 fluoresceincarbonyl Lalanylltaxol
`FLUTAX and 704N4coumarincarbony1Lalanyll
`taxol CUTAX were obtained by the reaction of 70L
`alanyltaxol with the corresponding amine reactive fluo
`rescent dye as described Souto et al 19951 Other
`fluorescent taxoids were obtained by this general method
`and purified by preparative Thin layer chromatography
`TLC They gave a single spot on TLC plates with
`several eluents 2 OAcetyl7O N4 fluoresceincar
`2 AcFLUTAX was obtained
`bony1Lalanylltaxol
`from 2 0acetyltaxol Mellado et al
`19841 by its
`and sub
`conversion into 2 0acetyl70Lalanyltaxol
`sequent reaction with 4 carboxyfluorescein
`ester Molecular Probes C2210 Eugene OR N4
`methyl ester was prepared
`fluoresceincarbony1Lalanine
`ester with
`the same succinimidyl
`by the reaction of
`Lalanine methyl ester hydrochloride Fluka 05200 Buchs
`Switzerland
`70F4 tetramethylrhodaminecarbony1Lalanyll
`taxol ROTAX was synthesized from 70Lalany1
`taxol and 4 carboxytetramethylrhodamine
`succinimidyl
`ester Molecular Probes C2211 and its structure Fig 1
`was confirmed as follows HRFAB+MS mNBA miz
`13375141 MH± calculated for C83H85N401913375182
`1H NMR 300 MHz CDC13 298 K TMS 8 = 838 s
`1H H3 R 820 d 1H H5 R 807 d 2H o H of
`Pha 769 d 2H oH of Phc 769719 band 11H
`
`succinimidyl
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`MicrotubuleFluorescent
`
`Taxoid Interactions
`
`75
`
`trile
`
`gradient
`
`600M11 €555 = 80000 M1 cm
`
`s 3H 10CH3C0 209 m 1H H6b 179 s 6H
`H18 H19 134 d 3H CH3 of Ala 118 s 3H H17
`116 s 3H H16
`FLUTAX CUTAX ROTAX and 2 AcFLUTAX
`had ultraviolet UV visible absorbance and fluorescence
`emission spectra in accordance with the respective chro
`mophores Highperformance
`liquid chromatography
`HPLC purity 228 nm was FLUTAX 91 03
`taxol 2 AcFLUTAX 89 undetectable taxol 08
`FLUTAX C18 25 X 04 cm column 2080 acetoni
`in 005 trifluoroacetic
`acid in water
`ROTAX 95 undetectable taxol C4 column in the
`of FLUTAX ROTAX
`same eluent The concentrations
`and 2 AcFLUTAX were determined spectrophotometri
`cally in 05 sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS 50 mM
`sodium phosphate buffer pH 70 respectively employing
`€458€458 =
`the practical extinction coefficients €458 = = 23100 ±
`16600 ± 600 M1 cm 1 obtained by weighing and by
`SDS solubilization of the taxoids Similar to taxol Song
`et al 19961 FLUTAX partially
`adsorbs to glass and
`plastic containers from which it can be recovered with
`05 SDS Without SDS about 1525 of 2 to 25µM
`FLUTAX solutions would adsorb
`to the walls of a
`spectrophotometer cell Ligand solubilities were deter
`mined by ultracentrifugation of 02 ml aliquots at 100000g
`and 25°C during 10 min and measuring the concentration
`in the upper and lower half of the tubes
`Taxol Paclitaxel was in part a gift
`Myers Squibb Princeton NJ the owner of the regis
`from
`tered trademark Docetaxel Taxotere was a gift
`RhonePoulenc Rorer Autong France SDS was from
`BioRad Hercules CA Other chemicals were as de
`scribed Diaz and Andreu 1993 De Ines et al 19941
`unless otherwise indicated
`
`from Bristol
`
`Proteins Microtubule Assembly Binding of
`Ligands and Spectroscopic Measurements
`
`diphosphate GDPtubulin was
`Purified guanosine
`prepared from calf brain as described elsewhere Diaz
`
`and Andreu 19931 GDP from Sigma St Louis MO
`sodium salt type I undetectable GTP in HPLC was now
`employed giving 95 ± 3 GDPliganded tubulin in the
`
`HPLC nucleotide analysis GDPtubulin was assembled
`with a 121 taxoidtubulin molar ratio except otherwise
`indicated in PEGM buffer pH 66 at 37°C for 2 hr
`followed by 10 min centrifugation of 02 ml aliquots at
`100000g 37°C Pellets were resuspended in cold PEDTA
`buffer or in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer 025 SDS
`pH 70 FLUTAX and tubulin concentrations
`in pellets
`and supernatants were determined fluorometrically in
`aliquots diluted in 025 SDS with the appropriate
`standards and taxol was determined by HPLC with
`as an internal standard Bovine microtubule
`docetaxel
`
`H
`OAc 2
`OH oCOPha
`
`cPhCONFI 0
`bPhN1
`H
`
`zO
`
`taxol
`
`FLUTAX
`
`COCHMeNFICO
`
`CO2H
`
`OH
`
`ROTAX
`
`COCHMeNFICO
`
`5R
`
`40
`
`1R
`
`3R
`3R
`
`CO2
`
`8R7 7R
`
`Me2N
`
`0
`
`4R
`
`NMe2
`
`5R
`
`Fig 1 Chemical structures of the fluorescent
`ployed in this work
`
`taxol derivatives em
`
`m and pH of Pha o m and pH of Phb m and pH
`of Phc 700 d 1H NH 651648 band 2H H 2R
`H7R 643 and 642 two s 2H H4R H5R 637628
`band 3H H 1R H 7R H6 R 627 s 1H H10 612
`t 1H H13 575563 band 3H H2 H7 H3
`490
`m 2H H5 CH of Ala 474 d 1H H2
`425 d 1H
`H20a 416 d 1H H 20b 388 d 1H H3 357
`broad s 2 OH 292 s 12H 2xNCH32 252 m 1H
`H6a 234 s 3H 4CH3C0 230 m 2H H14 224
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`76
`
`Evangelio et al
`
`2 uranyl
`
`protein was prepared as described de Pereda et al 19951
`and assembled 4 mgml in 100 mM Pipes 1 mM EGTA
`1 mM MgC12 1 mM GTP pH 69 at 37°C Aliquots of
`noncentrifuged microtubules were examined by fluores
`cence microscopy see below or adsorbed to Formvar
`and carbon coated copper grids negatively stained with
`and photographed with a Philips
`acetate
`EM400 electron microscope
`Absorption spectra were recorded with Varian Cary
`3E and Hitachi U2000 spectrophotometers Light scatter
`ing by microtubules was corrected by double logarithmic
`back extrapolation from non absorbing spectral
`Andreu and Timasheff
`19841
`Fluorescence
`spectra
`were acquired with Shimadzu RF540 and SLM 8000 D
`lifetime steadystate
`Fluorescence
`spectrofluorimeters
`anisotropy measurements were per
`and time resolved
`formed as described elsewhere Mateo et al 19911
`
`regions
`
`Cell Lines Cytoskeletons and Fluorescence
`Microscopy
`
`PtK2 potoroo epithelial like kidney cells U937
`monocytic human leukemia and K562 human myelocytic
`leukemia cells were grown as described previously De
`Ines et al 1994 Neuro 2A mouse neuroblastoma was
`grown in DME nutrient mixture F12 Ham Sigma with
`10 fetal calf serum FCS 2 mM glutamine nonessen
`and antibiotics
`tial amino acids
`Trypanosoma cruzi
`strain Tulahuen Tagliaferro and Pizzi 19551 was cul
`tured as described Baum et al 19811 Coverslip
`attached PtK2 cytoskeletons were prepared
`as described
`De Ines et al 19941 They were either directly observed
`fixed with 02 glutaraldehyde in PEM at
`room
`or
`temperature for 15 mM and then for 15 mM in 2 mgml
`NaBH4 These mildly fixed cytoskeletons were sequen
`tially incubated with DM1A monoclonal antibody Sigma
`diluted 1400 in PBS 10 mgml BSA 1 hr at 37°C
`biotinylated sheep antimouse immunoglobulins Amer
`sham diluted 1400 45 mM and streptavidinTexas Red
`Amersham Amersham Buckinghamshire UK di
`luted 1400 30 min 1 µM FLUTAX was added into the
`In other experiments unfixed PtK2
`three incubations
`labeled with FLUTAX were photographed
`prior to fixation with methanol 10 min at 20°C and
`acetone 6 min at 20°C incubated with TU30 mouse
`monoclonal antibody to ytubulin diluted 18 NovakOva
`et al 19961 and C85 purified rabbit monospecific antibod
`ies to utubulin Arevalo et al 19901 40 µgm1 for 1 hr at
`37°C followed by incubation with biotinylated sheep
`antimouse immunoglobulins 11000 for 45 min and
`red 11000 and fluores
`finally with streptavidinTexas
`immunoglobulins Sigma 140
`ceinated goat antirabbit
`for 30 min Cells and cytoskeletons were mounted in 013
`M glycine buffer pH 86 containing 020 M NaC1 70
`glycerol and 005 µgm1 Hoescht 33342 Sigma Living
`
`cytoskeletons
`
`cells were mounted in fluorescent
`taxoid containing
`culture medium to which propidium iodide 1 µgm1
`Sigma and Hoescht 33342 005 µgm1 had been added
`just before observation living cells excluded propidium
`iodide and their nuclei were stained with Hoescht 33342
`through 63X
`were observed
`Cells and cytoskeletons
`PlanApochromat and PlanNeofluar objectives with Zeiss
`Axioplan epifluorescence microscopes with appropriate
`filter combinations for Hoescht 33342 fluorescein rhoda
`mine and Texas red their images were recorded
`sepa
`rately either on Kodak TMAX film and scanned with an
`Ektron 1412 digital
`imaging camera system or with a
`Photometrics 200 KAF1400 cooled CCD camera and
`software and were printed with Adobe
`IPLab Spectrum
`Photo shop
`
`RESULTS
`
`The chemical structures of fluorescein and rhoda
`mine labeled taxoids prepared by conjugation through the
`free amino group of 70Lalanyltaxol with amine
`dyes Souto et al 19951 Materials and Meth
`reactive
`ods are shown in Figure 1 FLUTAX the main probe
`employed in this work is fully >02 mM soluble in 10
`mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 85 and insoluble at
`pH 40 The solubility of FLUTAX and 2 AcFLUTAX
`at pH 70 is approximately 80 of the initial
`concentra
`tion <01 mM 50 at pH 66 and further reduced by 7
`mM MgC12 The solubility of FLUTAX increases in the
`presence of
`tubulin and has been employed without
`problems in cell culture media containing 10 FCS The
`solubility of ROTAX in aqueous buffers at neutral pH is
`approximately 1 µM
`
`Microtubule Assembling and Binding Activities of
`Fluorescent Taxoids
`
`test
`
`A stringent biochemical
`for the activity of
`taxoids is their ability to induce the assembly of microtu
`bules from the otherwise inactive GDPliganded form of
`tubulin Diaz and Andreu 19931 Figure 2A shows the
`time courses of assembly of microtubules induced by
`line 1 FLUTAX line 2 and the rhodamine
`taxol
`analogue ROTAX line 3 indicating that the fluorescent
`
`slower assembly inducers
`than
`are slightly
`analogues
`taxol As negative controls we employed the fluorescein
`moiety N4 fluoresceincarbony1Lalanine methyl es
`ter line 4 and 2 AcFLUTAX line 5 which lacks the
`essential 2 hydroxy group of
`the taxol
`side chain
`Williams et al 1996 JimenezBarbero
`et al submit
`ted The polymers induced by FLUTAX and ROTAX are
`microtubules as shown in Figure 2BC although possible
`modifications in their substructure as those induced by
`to be ad
`the parent drug see Introduction are still
`dressed Sedimentation measurements of assembled tubu
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`MicrotubuleFluorescent
`
`Taxoid Interactions
`
`77
`
`two and fourfold larger than that of
`are respectively
`taxol Comparative critical concentration measurements
`analyzed with the theory of linked functions Wyman and
`Gill 1990 Diaz et al 19931
`have indicated that
`the
`magnesium dependence of the FLUTAXinduced poly
`merization is more pronounced
`than that of taxol with
`29 instead of 19 additional Mg2+
`ions bound per
`tubulin polymerized Fig 3B The pH dependence
`is
`slightly less pronounced 02 instead of 05 additional H±
`ions per tubulin and the effect of temperature is more
`for FLUTAX than for taxol the value of the
`pronounced
`apparent vant Hoff enthalpy change was 123 instead of
`64 kJ mo11 not shown
`Spectrofluorometric measurements of ligand bound
`to the microtubule pellets confirmed that each assembled
`tubulin dimer binds 097 ± 008 FLUTAX molecules not
`shown the same as taxol Diaz and Andreu 19931
`FLUTAX was also bound by preassembled microtubules
`containing microtubule associated proteins in an approxi
`mately unitary ratio with the tubulin dimers although
`FLUTAX precipitation in Pipes buffer prevented accurate
`quantitation not shown Measurements of competition
`between FLUTAX and taxol for binding to microtubules
`Fig 3C points are quantitatively described by a simple
`model of binding to the same microtubule
`site solid
`lines with an apparent dissociation constant
`8 times
`larger for FLUTAX than for taxol
`
`Spectroscopic Changes in Fluorescent Taxoid
`upon Binding to Microtubules
`
`The fluorescence
`spectrum and lifetime of
`the
`fluorescein chromophore covalently bound to 7alanyl
`taxol as well as the chromophore ionization constant are
`very similar to those of
`free fluorescein in solution
`Although FLUTAX was initially
`as a taxol
`designed
`derivative substituted at nonessential position 7 Kings
`ton 19941 very probably out of the binding site it has
`to be a microenvironmentsensitive
`probe
`turned out
`Interestingly when FLUTAX is bound to microtubules
`there is a 3nm red shift
`in the absorption band of the
`fluorescein dianion 493 nm and an increase relative to
`the absorption of the shoulder at 464 nm Fig 4A and
`Table I These changes could be determined with accu
`racy by comparison with the inactive controls N4
`methyl ester and 2 Ac
`
`fluoresceincarbony1Lalanine
`FLUTAX showing that
`the fluorescein dianion the
`emitting species in FLUTAX Fig 4B is preferentially
`bound by microtubules This suggests a cationic microen
`vironment around the fluorescent probe in microtubules
`Comparative titrations have indicated a small but signifi
`cant down shift of 03 ± 01 pH units in the apparent pKa
`of FLUTAX upon binding to microtubules relative to its
`value in free solution 654 ± 003 MP Lillo et al
`
`unpublished observations
`
`r
`
`080
`
`060
`
`nm
`
`A
`
`040
`
`020
`
`000
`
`4
`
`5
`
`2
`
`3
`
`1
`
`I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100 120 140 200
`
`Time min
`
`bsorbance4
`
`00
`
`AA
`
`taxoids A
`Fig 2 Microtubule
`assembly induced by fluorescent
`records of 25 itM purified GDPtubulin in PEGM buffer
`Turbidimetric
`pH 66 at 37°C assembled with 30 itM taxol 1 FLUTAX 2
`ROTAX 3 N4 fluoresceincarbony1ralanine methyl ester 4 or
`2 AcFLUTAX 5 B Electron micrograph of microtubules
`as
`stained with uranyl acetate C
`sembled with FLUTAX negatively
`Microtubules assembled with ROTAX Bar = 100 nm
`
`lin at varying total FLUTAX concentrations
`indicated an
`apparent stoichiometry of one FLUTAX bound per tubu
`lin not shown
`Taxoidinduced assembly of GDPtubulin is a rigor
`ous equilibrium protein condensation polymerization in
`which the critical protein concentration the minimal
`required for assembly is to a good approxi
`concentration
`to the apparent equilibrium constant
`mation equivalent
`of dissociation of one aBtubulin molecule from the
`microtubule end Oosawa and Asakura 1975 see Diaz et
`al 19931 The measurements of Figure 3A indicate
`of FLUTAX and ROTAX which
`critical concentrations
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`1
`
`1 6
`
`1
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`10
`
`08
`
`06
`
`04
`
`02
`
`00
`
`LigandpProtein1
`
`14
`
`a 13
`
`12
`
`11
`
`10
`
`62 60 58 56
`
`54 52
`
`78
`
`Evangelio et al
`
`A
`
`A
`
`rad
`rEi not E
`9YWIC
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0 L
`
`0
`
`pM
`
`TUBULIN
`
`TUBULINo
`
`µN1
`
`Ln a
`
`Mg2+
`
`Ln Flutaxs
`
`Faxogs
`
`Fig 3 A Critical concentration Cr plots for GDPtubulin assembly with
`taxol drdea c 15 µM FLUTAX triangle Cr 26 µM and ROTAX
`scluaresl Cr 55 µM under same conditions as Figure 2 The concentration
`of pelleted protein filled symbols and protein in the supernatant open
`symbols is plotted as a function of total tubulin concentration B Linkage
`constant Km
`graphs Wyman and Gill 1990 of the apparent elongation
`Cril of FLUTAX filled d rd es and taxolinduced open d rd es polymer
`ization of tubulin versus activity of Mg2+ ions The slopes 29 and 19
`to the increment of Mg2+ ions preferentially bound
`respectively are equal
`the protomer C Competition of FLUTAX
`by the tubulin polymer over
`filled d rd es and taxol open d rd es for binding to microtubules assembled
`
`06
`
`0 c
`
`o 04
`
`02
`
`00
`300
`
`and 50 µM total
`from 45 µM GDPtubulin
`performed essentially as described for docetaxel and taxol Diaz and Andreu
`1993 in PEGM buffer at pH 70 and 37°C 7582 of total tubulin was
`assembled The ratio of free FLUTAX to free taxol concentration
`
`taxoid The experiment was
`
`abscissa
`
`was measured in the supematant It was modified by varying the ratio total
`taxol The extents of binding of FLUTAX filled circles and
`FLUTAXtotal
`taxol empty el roles change whereas their sum squares remains practi
`cally constant The lines are the best fit
`to a simple model of competition for
`the same site in assembled tubulin Diaz and Andreu 1993 which indicates
`a ratio of apparent affinities of FLUTAX to taxol of 012
`
`10
`
`08
`
`cd
`
`71
`
`g 04
`
`cn0
`
`02= 02
`
`LL
`
`I
`
`I
`
`350
`
`400 450 500 550
`
`Wavelength
`
`nm
`
`520
`560
`600
`Wavelength nm
`
`Fig 4 A Absorption
`spectra of free FLUTAX 2 µM in PEGM buffer pH 66 line 1 absorbance
`multiplied by 10 FLUTAX bound to microtubules 20 µM line 2 same conditions plus 25 µM tubulin
`notice the light scattering due to microtubules and free FLUTAX 20 µ111
`in the same buffer dashed line 3
`due to FLUTAX aggregation B Corrected
`shown for comparison
`notice the absorption changes
`fluorescence spectrum of FLUTAX in microtubules Xex = 470 nm slit 2 nm The normalized spectrum of
`free FLUTAX in buffer was marginally wider at the red side
`
`anisotropy r of
`The
`fluorescence
`stationary
`FLUTAX increased by an order of magnitude to 02
`when bound to microtubules compared with the value in
`solution Table I nevertheless this is still onehalf of
`
`what would be observed for the completely immobilized
`dye ro470 = 038 Chen and Bowman 19651 The
`lifetime of FLUTAX in solution and bound
`fluorescence
`to microtubules was the same 45 nsec The time
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`MicrotubuleFluorescent
`
`Taxoid Interactions
`
`79
`
`TABLE I Spectroscopic Parameters of Free and MicrotubuleBound FLUTAX in PEMG Buffer at 37°C
`b M1 cm 1 0D4930D464
`xr
`nm
`
`maxnm
`
`X
`
`Concn
`11A
`
`FLUTAX
`
`Ea41a6r
`
`i3000
`
`±005
`
`QtFel
`
`nsd
`±02
`
`re
`±0004
`
`nsr
`
`18
`21
`21
`
`08
`10
`08
`
`45
`
`0028
`0030
`020
`
`4 it
`
`1
`
`006
`
`33000
`43000
`
`46000
`
`492
`
`493
`
`496
`
`522
`
`522
`
`522
`
`2 2
`
`20
`
`Free PEGM pH 66
`Free PEGM pH 70
`Bound PEGM pH 66
`Corrected emission spectra Xex = 470 nm slit 2 nm
`bEffective molar absorption coefficient
`fluorescence yield Xex = 470 nm bandwidth 2 nm reference QF = 10 for FLUTAX 2 itM in PEGM buffer pH 70
`lifetime model
`decays were best
`fitted to a single exponential
`Xex = 470 nm >kern = 520 nm slit 2 nm
`rAnisotropy relaxation time di and residual anisotropy r Xex = 380 nm >kern > 500 nm cutoff
`
`eRelative
`
`dFluorescence
`
`eSteadystate fluorescence anisotropy
`
`filter
`
`restrictions
`
`resolved analysis of rt contains
`a very fast hundreds of
`picoseconds initial depolarization from r0380 = 024
`to 018 that could not be resolved with our instrumenta
`tion This is followed by a slower depolarization process
`with a time constant of 4 ± 1 nsec to finally attain a
`residual value roo = 006 Table I The biphasic depolar
`ization results from the very fast unrestricted angular
`motions of the dye moiety followed by a slower motion
`with its supporting molecular structures while the non
`roo value is characteristic of
`zero residual
`the angular
`imposed to probe rotation by the protein
`matrix Note that application of the diffusion inacone
`results in wobbling semi
`model Kinosita et al 19771
`angles of 66° and 80°
`for the fast and slow motions
`respectively A possible alternative to account
`for the
`depolarization might be the resonant
`time dependent
`transfer of energy between identical chromophores homo
`transfer Van der Meer et al 19941 However
`the
`contribution of homotransfer to the depolarization in the
`present case is considered to be less than 20 This upper
`limit was obtained from the changes observed in anisot
`ropy by FLUTAX excitation in the red edge of
`absorption spectra Valeur and Weber 19781 In addition
`numerical modelling of the transfer rate in a microtubule
`lattice excludes homotransfer as a cause of the very fast
`initial depolarization
`
`its
`
`Observation and Self organization of Microtubules
`With Fluorescent Taxoids
`
`assembled
`from GDPtubulin with
`Microtubules
`FLUTAX and ROTAX are readily visualized under the
`fluorescence microscope either as individual microtu
`bules or with different degrees of entanglement Fig
`5AB Radial structures resembling asters could be
`assembled
`between
`observed
`samples
`in microtubule
`glass slide and coverslip at room temperature inset Fig
`5B Dense microtubule bundles Fig 5C consistently
`formed irrespective of microtubules being polymerized
`either in a tube at 37°C or directly between glasses When
`from tubulin and MAPs
`microtubules were assembled
`the further addition of FLUTAX resulted in rapid <1
`
`mm labeling with the fluorescent
`taxoid as shown in
`Figure 5D This confirmed
`that FLUTAX binds to
`irrespective of MAPs see above
`and
`microtubules
`taxoid would also bind to
`the fluorescent
`
`suggested that
`cellular microtubules
`
`Specific Labeling of Microtubules and
`Centrosomes of Cytoskeletons With FLUTAX
`Comparison With Antitubulin Antibodies
`FLUTAX 1 itM was
`found to bind to and
`stabilize microtubules of unfixed PtK2 cytoskeletons
`in
`PBS making microtubules readily observable under the
`fluorescence microscope not shown Fixation of cyto
`skeletons with formaldehyde or methanol destroyed the
`FLUTAX binding sites fixation of cells incubated with
`20 itM FLUTAX with 37 formaldehyde and methanol
`fixation with 02
`gave the same result However
`glutaraldehyde permitted the simultaneous visualization
`of microtubules with both FLUTAX and monoclonal
`antibodies to tubulin As shown in Figure 6ABCD the
`same individual cytoplasmic microtubules can be stained
`by FLUTAX and the DM1A antibody although the taxoid
`detected somewhat weakly the fixed microtubules Bind
`ing of FLUTAX is specific since 1 it
`is displaced by
`excess docetaxel 50 itM not shown and 2 most of the
`
`microtubules disappear by previous cell
`treatment with
`inhibitor CI980025 itM De Ines et al
`the powerful
`19941 Fig 6CD There
`are several
`important differ
`to antibodies FLUTAX stained centro
`ences with respect
`somes more accurately
`and brightly than the antibody
`both in interphase Fig 6CD and in mitotic cells Fig
`6EJ and stained astral microtubules less intensely than
`Two bright
`spots could be frequently
`the antibody
`resolved with FLUTAX in the centrosomes of interphase
`cells The anaphase and telophase
`spindles frequently
`the equator corre
`showed a characteristic dark line at
`sponding to the midzone of the cleavage furrow when
`fixed with 02 glutaraldehyde were visu
`alized by immunofluorescence with DM1A Fig 6H and
`other antibodies to tubulin not shown note that this zone
`may be stained after methanol fixation However micro
`
`cytoskeletons
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`80
`
`Evangelio et al
`
`taxoids under the epifluorescence microscope A Microtu
`Fig 5 Microtubules
`imaged with fluorescent
`bules assembled with 25 gM tubulin and FLUTAX B Another view of FLUTAX microtubules
`of FLUTAX microtubules C Bundles of ROTAX microtubules D
`radial
`asterlike formation
`Microtubules assembled with MAPs and visualized immediately after addition of FLUTAX and dilution to
`microtubule protein Bar = 10 gm
`04 mg
`
`inset a
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`MicrotubuleFluorescent
`
`Taxoid Interactions
`
`81
`
`indirect
`
`Fig 6 Simultaneous binding of FLUTAX ACEGI and the DM1A monoclonal antibody to tubulin
`immunofluorescence BDFHJ to mildly fixed PtK2 cytoskeletons AB Interphase cells CD
`Cells treated with 025 gM CI980 for 4 hr to depolymeryze microtubules EF Anaphase spindle GH
`spindle Lb Cytokinesis Bars = 10 gm Bar in C for C and D bar in I for all other panels
`
`Telophase
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`82
`
`Evangelio et al
`
`tubules were clearly labeled in the midzone by FLUTAX
`Fig 6EG Consequently the central zone of midbodies
`was much more strongly stained by the taxoid Fig 61 It
`should be noted that marked staining of the central zone
`of midbodies was also observed with ROTAX in unfixed
`not shown and with FLUTAX in living
`cells see Fig 9
`
`cytoskeletons
`
`To further characterize
`the centrosomal staining
`with FLUTAX it was compared to detection with TU30
`antibody to ytubulin Novakova
`et al
`monoclonal
`19961 after recording the corresponding FLUTAX im
`ages of cytoskeletons The two bright spots labeled by
`FLUTAX in interphase cells presumably corresponding
`to two centrioles Fig 7A coincide with the zone
`detected by the antibody to ytubulin Fig 7B Co
`localization was equally observed after centrosomal divi
`sion in prophase Fig 7EF and in anaphase cells Fig
`7IJ and only one FLUTAX spot per centrosome was
`distinguished in these cases
`
`Observation of Unfixed Cellular Microtubules and
`Living Cells With FLUTAX
`
`Optimal microtubule visualization was obtained
`shortly after <1mM FLUTAX addition to unfixed Ptk2
`in PEM microtubulestabilizing buffer
`cytoskeletons
`ROTAX gave microtubular
`images but also nonmicrotu
`bular vesicular staining possibly due to the binding of
`rhodamine to other organelles and its use with cells was
`not further pursued FLUTAX is a specific microtubule
`visualization probe since the microtubule images were
`and a few microtubules of
`reduced to the centrosomes
`Ptk2 cells by pretreatment with 10 laM colchicine not
`shown and were erased by an excess of nonfluorescent
`taxoid in a few minutes or with 2 AcFLUTAX instead
`of FLUTAX Fig 8AB note that the nucleolar staining
`by FLUTAX in cytoskeletons is nonspecific
`since it
`is
`not displaced by an excess of nonfluorescent taxoid On
`the other hand treatment of a variety of cells with 1
`laM
`FLUTAX during 054 hr or culturing the cells with
`of the probe followed sim
`subinhibitory concentrations
`ply by removal of excess medium and directly mounting
`the coverslips with 70 glycerol containing buffer gave
`good images of the cellular microtubule network
`typi
`than immunofluorescence of
`cally with less background
`examples of Ptk2 epithelial
`fixed cells Representative
`cells U937 leukemia cells neuro2A neuroblastoma cells
`and Trypanosoma cruzi directly stained with FLUTAX
`are presented in Figure 8CF respectively Each of these
`images disappeared when 50 laM docetaxel was added to
`the cultures simultaneously with FLUTAX not shown
`The images shown in Figure 8CF do not result
`from FLUTAX internalized and bound by living cells but
`its intensity is mainly due to entry of residual FLUTAX
`by rupture of the plasma membrane during mounting and
`
`fast binding to microtubules In fact observation of intact
`Ptk2 cells with 130 laM FLUTAX in culture medium
`gave much weaker
`incubation of
`images However
`growing U937 human leukemia cells with 15 nM
`FLUTAX during 16 hr permitted visualization of centro
`somes and attached fibrillar structures in interphase cells
`Fig 9AB prophase spindle poles Fig 9CD the two
`half spindles in metaphase Fig 9EF anaphase Fig
`9GH and the midbody in cytokinesis Fig 9IJ Again
`images were ligandspecific since localized fluores
`all
`cence was completely abolished when 1
`laM docetaxel
`was added to the cell cultures 4 h before observation Fig
`9KL This low FLUTAX concentration had an insignifi
`cant effect on the cell cycle of U937 cells Fig 9MN
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Fluorescent Taxoids as Microtubule Probes
`
`FLUTAX constitutes a specific probe for the taxol
`binding site of microtubules which induces the assembly
`of purified tubulin into microtubules with similar overall
`properties and slightly lower efficiency than the parent
`drug taxol FLUTAX binds to one site per assembled
`dimer competing with taxol with eightfold weaker appar
`ent affinity The enhanced Mg2+ dependency of FLUTAX
`induced microtubule
`elongation compared
`to taxol
`indicates the presence of one additional Mg2+ ion bound
`per tubulin polymerized This cation is not necessarily
`localized although it might be in complex with the
`anionic fluorescein chromophore which undergoes
`a red
`indicating a decreased polarity andor ion pair
`shift
`formation Interestingly the change detected in the fluo
`rescein absorption spectrum upon FLUTAX binding to
`microtubules is evidence of a cationic microenvironment
`of the fluorescein group attached to position 7 of taxol
`compatible with the proximity of a metal cation or of
`some basic
`residues of
`tubulin even the protein as a
`whole has a net negative charge In this context
`cent Ndimethylaminobenzoyl
`taxol derivatives at posi
`tions 7 and 10 have been reported to probe
`in microtubules than 2 and
`hydrophobic environment
`N derivatives Sengupta et al 19971
`the timeresolved
`Analysis of
`fluorescence
`data
`indicates that FLUTAX binds to microtubules in a way
`that allows considerable freedom of motion of the bulky
`steric restrictions from the
`fluorescein group with little
`protein The simplest interpretation is that the taxoid is
`bound on a microtubule surface or into a cleft commen
`surate with the tubulin monomer with the C7 and C10
`side of the taxane ring system pointing to the solvent
`This observation may help to locate the taxol binding site
`in microtubules It
`is compatible with the easy accessibil
`the taxoid binding site in in vitro assembled
`ity of
`microtubules Dye et al 1993 Diaz and Andreu unpub
`
`fluores
`
`a less
`
`Abraxis EX2061
`Cipla Ltd. v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`IPR2018-00162; IPR2018-00163; IPR2018-00164
`
`

`

`MicrotubuleFluorescent
`
`Taxoid Interactions
`
`83
`
`us
`
`Fig 7 Comparison of the centrosomal area visualized with FLUTAX and TU30 monoclonal antibody to
`ytubulin PtK2 cytoskeletons were labeled with FLUTAX AEI then fixed and simultaneously stained

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket