throbber
NUCLEOSIDES, NUCLEOTIDES & NUCLEIC ACIDS, 20(4~7), 621-628 (2001)
`
`PRACTICAL SYNTHESIS, SEPARATION,
`_. AND STEREOCHEMICAL ASSIGNMENT
`OF THE PMPA PRO-DRUG GS-7340
`
`H. Chapman,” M. Kernan,E. Prisbe,J. Rohloff, M.Sparacino,
`T. Terhorst, and R. Yu
`
`Gilead Sciences, 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, Califomia 94404
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The practical synthesis of a mixed phenoxy-amidate derivative of PMPAwith
`high oral bioavailability and favorable pharmacokinetics is described. The non-
`stereoselective synthetic route produces a J:1 mixture of two diastereomers at
`phosphorous. Simulated moving bed chromatographyusing Chiralpak AS en-
`abled kilo-scale isolation of the more potent diastereomer (GS-7340). The GS-
`7340 phosphorouschiral center was found to be (S) by X-ray crystallography,
`
`. The nucleotide analog, 9-(2-(R)-phosphonomethoxypropy]Jadenine (PMPA,
`1) (1) has shownpotent activity against human immunodeficiency virus in vitro
`(2). The lipophilic diester pro-drug, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (2),
`is cur-
`‘rently in advanced clinical evaluation as an oral AIDS therapy (3). Continuing
`research into novel PMPA pro-moieties has recently led to the-identification of the
`mixed phenoxy-amidate derivative ofPMPA (3) which was designated as GS-7171
`(Fig. 1). Due to the asymmetric centeratphosphorous and non:stereoselective syn-
`thetic route, GS-7171 was composed of a 1:1 mixture of two diastereomers (the
`(R)-PMPA side-chain and L-amino acid ester were homochiralstarting materials).
`Thehighoral bioavailabilityand favorable tissue-selective distribution of GS-7171
`madeit a promising candidate for further development. To ascertain the properties
`of the individual diastereomers, -a method to separate them was needed.
`
`“Corresponding author.
`
`62)
`
`Copyright © 200] by Marcel Dekker,Inc.
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`622
`
`,
`
`CHAPMAN ET AL.
`
`rao 2 SY
`9
`.
`9
`
`
`Ap >P-on Phengl a 9 p-o-{-)$0Ck ° A 07 Poo
`
`
`
`OH
`LS
`DCC
`/
`OH
`J
`NH
`CH,
`CH,
`Ch é \e
`
`oN
`
`Phenol
`
`oo
`
`1
`
`4
`
`NH,
`
`5
`
`"
`

`
`3)
`
`3
`

`
`A
`.
`.
`Simulated Moving Bed
`J
`Chromatography
`a =
`
`oY
`oOBuo’
`a
`NH
`cioweYY
`
`NH’?
`
`OH
`
`ox’ >9
`J
`HO =H Ne NOTPHO
`L/
`4
`oO
`NH

`. Hid é v
`
`N
`eN
`1!~~
`
`SN
`
`NH,
`
`ae
`
`Scheme I.
`
`:
`
`McGuigan and coworkers have recently reported related phenoxy-amidate
`pro-drugs of the monophosphates of antiviral nucleoside analogs (4). Although
`these compoundsare also P-chiral diastereomeric mixtures, the issues of diastere-
`omerseparation and differential activity have not been addressed. This communi-
`cation discloses a solution to the diastereomer “problem” that may be generally
`applicable.
`Theadditional pre-clinical testing required akilogram-scale preparation ofthe
`pure diastereomers. Esterification ofthe solubletriethylamine salt of PMPA (1) with
`phenol using dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) in hot 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
`(NMP)afforded 251% yield of PMPA monopheny]ester (4). Activation of (4) with
`thiony] chloridein dichloromethane gave the phosphonochloridate, which smoothly
`coupled with an excess of isopropyl L-alanine (5) to give the GS-7171 mixture (3)
`in 47% yield (unoptimjzed). Both steps werereadily performed on multi-kilogram
`scale in standard pilot plant equipment.
`Initially, the component diastereomers of amidate prodrug analogs were sepa-
`rated with repeated HPLCpurifications on a preparative C18 column. The marginal
`resolution ofthe diastereomers on this system (Fig. 2) necessitated multiple passes
`but culminated in isolation of ~100 mg of each isomer enriched to >95:5 purity.
`In vitro HYV assay showedthat the less retained isomer (GS-7340, 6) was more
`potent by a factor of ~10 and wasselected as the candidate for additional testing.
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`PMPA PRO-DRUGGS-7340
`
`623
`
`oO
`
`nH \_H
`NH
`N
`oO
`iSapeieeer
`Cr
`N7
`TN
`07
`~P-O7™
`“07
`*O
`Sw7 N07
`~P-OH
`LY on LYXK0.0
`
`Chy
`CHy
`0 a
`’
`
`.
`
`.
`
`N
`
`1, PMPA |
`
`NH
`
`2, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
`
`3, GS-7171
`
`Figure 1.
`
`Screening of commercially available chiral stationary phases revealed that
`Diacel’s Chiralpak AS with a mobile phase of 30% methanol in acetonitrile was
`a markedly more efficient chromatographic system (5) (Fig. 3). The remarkable
`resolution of the diastereomers (a = ~9) and the high solubility of GS-7171
`in the mobile phase (>300 g/L) allowed facile diastereomer separation. Using a
`
`et3n/Phos ph 6.5
`
`:
`
`PeakPro Report
`
`12 3 45 6 7
`Elution time
`
`8
`
`39
`
`10
`
`42
`
`14°
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`min’s
`
`Figure 2. HPLCseparation of the GS-717) component diastereomers on C18 columnpacking.
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`:
`
`CHAPMANETAL.
`
`624
`
`,
`
`PeakPro Report /
`mvV's3050.7090
`
`Detectorresponse 10
`
`Elution time
`
`min's
`
`Figure 3. HPLC separation of the GS-7171 component diastereomers on Chiracel AS column
`packing.
`
`laboratory-scale simulated moving bed chromatography (6) system composed of
`ten Chiralpak AS (7) columnsin series allowed separation of > 1 kg/day of mixture
`(8). The desired isomer, GS-7340, (6), was recoveredin nearly quantitative yield
`and >98% diastereomeric purity.
`a,
`:
`After chromatographic purification, GS-7340 wasreadily crystallized as the
`free base or as the fumarate salt (7). Needles of GS-7340free base were grown
`from water.
`.
`Structure determination by X-ray crystallography (9) allowed definitive as-
`signment of the phosphorous chiral center as (S) (Fig. 4) in the more active isomer,
`‘GS-7340.
`"Jn summary,a practical kilo-scale process for synthesis and purification of the
`phenoxy-amidate pro-dmg GS-7340 has been developed. The first correlation of
`activity with phosphorous absolute configuration in a phenoxy-amidate pro-drug
`has been made. Researchinto a diastereoselective synthetic process for GS-7340
`is ongoing.
`
`2» EXPERIMENTAL
`
`[(R)-2-(Phenylphosphonomethoxy)propylJadenine 4
`
`A glass-lined reactor was charged with anhydrous PMPA, (1) (14.6 kg,
`50.8 mol), pheno) (9.6 kg, 102 mol),and 1-methy]l-2-pyrrolidinone (39 kg). The
`mixture washeated to 85°C and triethylamine (6.3 kg, 62.3 mol) added. A solution
`of 1,3-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (17.1 kg, 82.9 mol) in ]-methy]-2-pyrrolidinone
`(1.6 kg) was then added over6 hoursat 100°C. Heating was continued for 16 hours.
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`PMPA PRO-DRUG GS-7340
`
`625
`
`Figure 4. Crystal Structure ofGS:7340, (6).
`
`The reaction was cooled to 45°C,diluted with water (29 kg), and cooled to 25°C.
`Solids were removed byfiltration and rinsed with water (15.3 kg). The combined
`filtrate and rinse was concentrated to’a tan slurry under reducedpressure, water
`(24.6 kg) was added, and adjusted to pH 11 with NaOH (25% in water). Suspended
`solids were removedbyfiltration through diatomaceousearth (2 kg) followed bya
`water-(4.4 kg) rinse. The combinedfiltrate and rinse was extracted with ethyl acetate
`(28kg).The aqueoussolution wasadjusted to pH 3.1 with HC] (37% in water) (4 kg),
`precipitating crude 4 which wasisolated by filtration and washed with methanol
`(12.7 kg). The wet product wasslurried in methanol (58kg),isolated byfiltration,
`washed with methanol (8.5 kg), and dried under reduced pressure to yield 4 as a
`white powder(9.33 kg, 51% yield). 1H NMR (300 MHz, D20,8): 1.2 (d, 3H), 3.45
`(q, 2H), 3.7 (q, 2H), 4 (m, 2H),4.2 (q, 2H), 4.35 (dd, 2H),6.6 (d, 2H), 7 (t, 1H), 7.15
`(t, 2H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.2 (s, 1H); >!P NMR (72 MHz, D,0, 8):15.0 (decoupled).
`
`Isopropyl L-alanine 5 -
`
`A glass-lined reactor was charged with L-alanine (7.1 kg, 80 mol) and iso-
`propanol (35.6 kg). The slurry was heated to reflux and chlorotrimethylsilane
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`
`
`626
`
`CHAPMANETAL.
`
`(14.6 kg, 134 mol) added over 69 minutes. Reflux was continued for 3 hours at
`which timethe reaction was homogeneous. Volatiles were removedby distillation
`at atmospheric pressure until the pot temperature reached 125°C. The pot residue
`was cooled to 34°C and diethyl ether (50 kg) added with vigorousstirring and
`further cooling to 21°C. Vigorous agitation was continued until crystals formed.
`The.slurry was cooled to about 0°C. Thesolid isopropyl L-alanine hydrochloride
`was isolated by filtration, rinsed with diethy! ether (5 kg), and dried to 12.35 kg
`off-white deliquescentcrystals. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCls, 5) :1.2 (m, 6H),1.7 (d,
`3H), 4.2 (m, 1H), 5.05 (m,1H), 8.6 (m, 3H). The free base isopropyl L-alanine was
`prepared by combininga solution of isopropyl! L-alanine hydrochloride, (9.12 kg,
`54 mol), in tetrahydrofuran (34 kg), with asolution of1 ,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane
`(5.48 kg, 49 mol) in tetrahydrofuran (15.5 kg) in a glass-lined reactor. Solid 1,4-
`diazabicyclo[2.2.2Joctane hydrochloride precipitated and was removed byfiltra-
`tion. Tetrahydrofuran was removedfrom the isopropy! L-alanine in the filtrate by
`carefuldistillation under reduced pressure. The productisopropyl L-alanine (5) was
`isolated as an oi) for use immediately in the next step withoutfurther processing or
`characterization.
`,
`
`GS-7171 3
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`A glass-lined reactor was charged with [(R)-2-(phenylphosphonomethoxy)-
`propylJadenine(4), (9.12 kg, 25.1 mol) and acetonitrile (30.7 kg). Thiony] chloride
`(6.57 kg, 56.7 mol) was added while maintaining the mixture below 50°C. The
`mixture washeated at 75°C until solids dissolved, then the reaction temperature
`was increased to 80°C andvolatiles (1 1.4 kg) collected by atmospheric distillation
`undernitrogen. Thepot residue was cooled to 25°C,diluted with dichloromethane
`(41 kg), and cooled to —29°C. A solution of isopropyl L-alanine (5) (ca. 7.1 kg,
`54 mol) in dichloromethane (36 kg) was added over 60 minutes at —1 8°C followed
`by triethylamine (7.66 kg, 75.7 mol) over 30 minutes at —18 to —11°C. The reac-
`tion mixture was warmed to room temperature and washed with 10% aq. sodium
`' dihydrogenphosphatesolution (5 x 15.7 kg). The organic solution was dried with
`anhydrous sodium sulfate (18.2 kg), filtered, rinsed with dichloromethane (28 kg),
`and concentrated to an oil under reduced pressure. Acetone (20 kg) was charged
`to the oil and the mixture concentrated under reduced pressure. Acetone (18.8 kg)
`was again chargedto theresulting oil. Half the product solution was purified by
`chromatography over a 38 x 38 cm bed of 22 kg silica gel 60 (230 to 400) mesh.
`The column was eluted with 480 kg acetone. The purification was repeated on
`the second half ofthe oil using’fresh silica gel and acetone. Clean productbearing
`fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure to an oil. Acetonitrile (19.6 kg)
`was charged to theoil and the mixture concentrated under reduced pressure. Ace-
`tonitrile (66.4 kg) was again charged andthe solution chilled to 0 to —5°C for
`16 hours. Solids were removed by filtration and thefiltrate concentrated underre-
`duced pressure affording 5.6 kg of 3 asa darkoil. 'H NMR (300 MHz, CDChh, 4):
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`PMPA PRO-DRUG GS-7340
`
`627
`
`1.1 (m, 12H), 3.7 (m, 1H), 4.0 (m, 5H), 4.2 (m, 1H), 5.0 (m, 1H), 6.2 (s, 2H),
`7.05 (m, 5H), 8.0 (s, 1H), 8.25 (d, 1H); 3!P NMR (72 MHz, CDCl, 6): 21.0, 22.5
`(decoupled).
`
`. "9-[(R)-2-[[(S)-[[(S)-1-(sopropoxycarbonyl)ethylJamino}-
`phenoxyphosphinyl)methoxy]propyladenine 6
`
`GS-7171 (3), 2.8 kg, was purified by continuous simulated moving bed chro-
`matography. Ten columnsfilled with 10 cm by 5 cm beds of packing, 20 micron
`Chiralpak AS (1.2 kg) were used. The columns were eluted with 30% methanol
`in acetonitrile.- Product bearing fractions were concentrated to a solution of 6 in
`acetonitrile (2.48 kg). The solution solidified to a crystalline mass wet with ace-
`tonitrile on standing. The crystalline mass was dried under reduced pressure to a
`tan crystalline powder, 1,3 kg 6 , 98.7% diastereomeric purity by HPLC: mp 117-
`~ 120°C; '"H NMR (300 MHz, CDCI, 8): 1.15 (m, 12H),3.7 (t, 1H), 4.0 (m, 5H), 4.2
`(dd, 1H), 5.0 (m, 1H), 6.05 (s, 2H), 7.1 (m, 5H), 8.0 (s, 1), 8.2 (s, 1H); 7!P NMR
`(72 MHz, CDCls, 6): 21.0 (decoupled).
`
`9-[(R)-2-[[(S)-[[(S)-1-(sopropoxycarbony])ethylJamino]-
`phenoxyphosphinyl]methoxy]propyljadenine Fumarate (1:1) 7
`
`A glass-lined reactor was charged with 9-[(R)-2-[[(S)-[[(S)-1-(isopropoxycar-
`bonyl)ethy]]amino]phenoxyphosphinylJmethoxy]propyl] adenine (6),
`(1.29. kg,
`2.71 mol), fumaric acid (284 g, 2.44 mol), and acetonitrile (24.6 kg). The mix-
`ture washeated torefluxto dissolve the solids,filtered while-hot, and cooled to 5°C _
`for 16 hours. The productwas isolated byfiltration, rinsed with acetonitrile (9.2 kg),
`and dried to 1.33 kg 7 as a white powder: mp 119.7-121.1°C; [a]p29-41.7° (c 1.0,
`acetic acid),
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Schultze, L. M.; Chapman, H. H.; Dubree, N. J.; Jones, R. J.; Kent, K.M.: Lee, T. T:
`Louie, M.S.; Postich, M. J.; Prisbe, E. J.; Rohloff, J.C.; Yu, R. H. Tetrahedron Letters,
`1998, 39, 1853-1856.
`2. Balzarini, J.; Aquaro, S.; Pero, C. F; Witvrouw, M.; Holy, A.; De> Clercq, E. Biochem.
`Biophy. Res. Commun., 1996, 219, 337.
`3. Schooley, R.; Myers, T. R.; Ruane, P.;Beall,G.; Lampiris, H.: McGowan, I. A Double-
`Blind, Pilacebo-Controlled Study ofTenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) for the Treat-
`ment of HIV Infection. Presentedat the 39" Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial
`Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, September, 1999.
`a) Siddiqui, A. Q., McGuigan,C.; Ballatore, C.; Zuccotto, F.; Gilbert, I. H.; De Clercq,
`E.; Balzarini, J. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4122-4128. b) Siddiqui, A. Q.; Ballatore,
`
`4.
`
`.
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

`

`u
`
`CHAPMAN ET AL.
`
`’
`
`C.; McGuigan, C.; De Clercq, E.; Balzarini, J. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 393-399.
`c) McGuigan, C.; Tsang, H-W.; Sutton, P. W.; De Clereq, E.; Balzarini, J. Antiviral
`Chemistry and Chemotherapy, 1998, 9, 109-115. d) McGuigan, C.; Tsang, H-W.;
`Cahard, D.; Turner, K.; Velaquez, S.; Salgado, A.; Bidois, L.; Naesens, L.; De Clercq,
`#B.; Balzarini; J. Antiviral Research, 1997, 35, 195-204. e) McGuigan, C.; Salgado,
`A.; Yamnold, C.; Harries, T.Y.; De Clercq, E.; Balzarini, J. Antiviral Chemistry and
`‘Chemotherapy, 1996, 7, 184-188. f) Balzarini, J., Karlsson, A., Aquaro, S.; Perno,
`C.-F; Cahard, D.; Naesens, L.; DeClercq, -E.; McGuigan, C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA, 1996, 93, 7295-7299.
`:
`.
`,
`Chapman, H.; Keman, M.; Rohloff, J.; Sparacino, M.; Terhorst, T. Purification of
`PMPAAmidate Prodrugs by SMB Chromatography and X-Ray Crystallographyofthe
`Diastereomerically Pure GS-7340. Submitted for publication in a supplementto Nucle-
`osides and Nucleotides on the XIV International Roundtable: Nucleosides, Nucleotides
`and their Biological Applications, San Francisco, CA, September, 2000.
`Francotte, E. R.; Richert, P. Journal of Chromatography A, 1997, 769, 101-107.
`Chiral Technologies Inc., amylose-tris(alpha-methy] benzyl! carbamate) coated onsilica
`gel.
`Continuous simulated moving bed chromatography was performed by Aerojet Fine
`’ Chemicals, Rancho Cordova, CA.
`Single-crystal x-ray structure determination was performed by F. J. Hollander at
`University of California, Berkeley.
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`IPR2018-00125
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`I-MAK 1008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket