`
`From: Unified Patents | shawn@unifiedpatents.com
`To: Roshan Mansinghani | roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Wednesday, Nov 15, 2017, 10:37 AM
`
`#2 PTAB Filer for 2017
`
`#6 PTAB Filer of All Time
`
`Unified Patents has filed more than 100 challenges against poor-quality NPE
`patents since 2013. Our actions have resulted in hundreds of free licenses,
`deterred litigations, and many millions of dollars in nuisance settlement and
`litigation fees saved. All without paying NPEs a dime.
`
`With the support of our more than 180 members, Unified has filed more
`independent challenges, cancelled more claims, and deterred more nuisance
`assertions than all other third parties … COMBINED.
`
`And we’re just getting started. Watch what we do in 2018, as we innovate new
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00045
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1040 Page 1
`
`
`
`ways to improve patent quality, deter NPE litigation, and incentivize true
`innovation.
`
`General Patent Corporation patent determined likely invalid
`
`
`On October 10, Unified’s IPR was instituted on all
`challenged claims on a patent owned by Kamatani
`Cloud, a subsidiary of General Patent Corporation. The
`'940 Patent, on measurement systems was asserted
`against Animetrics, Inc.
`
`Corporate IP Strategy Conference 2017
`November 16th in Santa Clara
`JOIN US FOR A FIRESIDE CHAT WITH
`DAVID RUSCHKE, CHIEF JUDGE OF PTAB
`
`Also join more than 200 in-house executives to discuss best practices and latest
`developments at the 4th Annual Corporate IP Strategy Conference (CIPSC) co-
`hosted by Unified Patents Inc. and the Santa Clara High Tech Law Journal.
`Speakers include top in-house IP executives from Salesforce, Huawei, Hulu,
`Verizon, Uber, Seagate, Delphi, Adobe, Google and others. Listen to speakers from
`Via, MPEGLA, HEVC Advance, and Marconi Group discuss the future of patent
`pools.
`
`
`
`7
`
`Zones
`
`180+
`
`Members
`
`Waitlist Only
`
`102
`
`Challenges
`
`APIX
`
`Validity Tool
`
`Jobs
`
`at Unified
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00046
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1040 Page 2
`
`
`
`MONKEYmedia patent challenged
`
`challenged
`Unified
`13,
`October
`On
`MONKEYmedia, Inc. The patent relates to a
`storage system and method to enable seamless
`media playback and has been thus far asserted
`against Samsung.
`
`Dominion Harbor patent challenged
`On October 13, Unified challenged Blue Sky
`Networks, a subsidiary of Dominion Harbor. The
`patent relates to operating wireless handsets and
`has been asserted
`in against companies as
`Toyota, MediaTek, Lenovo, BLU Products, and
`Best Buy.
`
`Universal Secure Registry patent challenged
`
`On October 16, Unified challenged a patent owned and asserted by Universal
`Secure Registry. The patent relates to financial accounts storage, and has been
`asserted thus far against Apple and Visa.
`
`+1 (650) 999-0899
`info@unifiedpatents.com
`You are receiving this because we have worked with you in the past
`
`Unsubscribe | Update your profile | Forward to a friend | View online
`
`Unified Patents
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00047
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1040 Page 3
`
`
`
`2 North 1st Street. 5th Floor
`San Jose, CA 95113
`
`Add us to your address book
`
`Copyright (C) 2017 Unified Patents. All rights reserved.
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00048
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1040 Page 4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
