`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: June 20, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00067
`Patent 8,577,813 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before BART A. GERSTENBLITH, SCOTT C. MOORE, and
`JASON W. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00067
`Patent 8,577,813 B2
`
`
`The parties contacted the Board by email of June 14, 2018, requesting
`a revised schedule. Patent Owner also informed the Board that it intends to
`file a motion to amend and requested a revised procedure for such a motion.
`Petitioner agrees with that proposed procedure.
`We adopt the parties’ proposal regarding a motion to amend.
`Accordingly, Patent Owner may submit a motion of up to 12 pages,
`Petitioner may file an opposition of up to 25 pages, Patent Owner may file a
`reply of up to 25 pages, and Petitioner may file a sur-reply of up to 10 pages.
`We further direct the parties to the Board’s decision in Western Digital
`Corp. v. SPEX Technologies, Inc., IPR2018-00082, Paper 13 (PTAB
`Apr. 25, 2018) (Informative), available at https://go.usa.gov/xQtQy, for
`guidance regarding motions to amend. The dates for the relevant filings and
`other dates revised by the parties are reflected in the following Amended
`Due Date Appendix, which shall replace the appendix contained in our
`May 3, 2018, Scheduling Order (Paper 16). All other aspects of the prior
`Scheduling Order remain the same.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00067
`Patent 8,577,813 B2
`
`
`AMENDED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`DUE DATE 1 ......................................................................... August 10, 2018
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ..................................................................... November 2, 2018
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ................................................................... November 27, 2018
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`Motion to Amend Sur-reply ................................................. December 5, 2018
`Petitioner’s Sur-reply to patent owner’s reply re: motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 .................................................................... December 10, 2018
`Observations regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 .................................................................... December 17, 2018
`Response to observations
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 .................................................................... December 21, 2018
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ........................................................................ January 30, 2019
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00067
`Patent 8,577,813 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jason Mudd
`Eric Buresh
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`jason.mudd@eriseip.com
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`
`Roshan Mansinghani
`Jonathan Stroud
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jim Glass
`Tigran Guledjian
`Christopher Mathews
`Nima Hefazi
`Richard Lowry
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`tigranguledjian@quinnemanuel.com
`chrismathews@quinnemanuel.com
`nimahefazi@quinnemanuel.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
