throbber

`CHAPTER “90: DISPLAY MHIIHICTIIRING
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`is either being designed or is in prototype form. Not all the test and repair
`equipment needed for manufacturing has be invented yet, and a continuous flow
`of new products is expected for the next decade. Multiple items of each category
`may be required for manufacturing, including optical or voltage imaging for defects.
`
`Table 2-18 Iii—Process Inspection and Repair Equipment List
`
`Equipment
`
`Remarks
`
`Electrical Parametric Test
`Substrate Flatness
`
`Sheet Resistivity Monitor
`
`Critical Dimension Measurement
`Particle Monitors
`Optical Microscope Inspection
`
`DigitaUAnalog Optical Inspection
`Voltage Imaging or
`other TFT imaging
`
`Laser Cutting
`
`Laser Deposition
`
`Design based on IC test equipment
`Similar to IC equipment
`
`ITO, metal line monitor, off-line and
`in-situ
`
`Similar to IC equipment
`Similar to IC equipment
`Similar to IC equipment
`
`Based on maskfwafer inSpection of ICs
`Specific design for TFT arrays
`
`Cut shorted metal lines -combine
`
`operation with laser deposition
`
`Metal deposition to repair Opens
`
`Table 2-19 is a list of assembly equipment with pricing for each item. The price
`includes semi~automatic cassette to cassette handlers, but does not include
`
`transport equipment from equipment item to equipment item. Equipment for
`assembly includes the actual joining and sealing of the substrates, separation and
`final testing, and die attach equipment for placing driver circuits on the completed
`panel or on flexible circuit boards which are attached to the panel.
`
`2.5.2 MANUFACTURING COST AND YIELD
`
`Yield vs ASP
`
`Yield considerations will be even more important for AMLCD manufacturing
`than for integrated circuit production. Figure 2-21 shows a simulated yield chart
`based on differing levels of defect densities and display sizes. This chart,
`developed by the process consultant N. Yamamura and published in the August,
`1990 issue of Nikkei Mierodevices, shows the dramatic effect of defect density
`
`on yield and cost of color TFT displays.
`
`In”!
`TCL 1017, Page 119
`LOWES 1017, Page 119
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 119
`
`

`

`CHAPTER TWO: DISPLAY HAN UFAC'I'IIRIHG
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Table 2-19 Assembly and Die Attach Equipment
`
`
`PricelRemarks
`Equipment
`————-—-—_______.._________.____
`
`Orientation Film Printer
`
`Orientation Film Rubbing
`Substrate Cleaning
`Spacer Spraying
`Seal Printing
`AlignmentISealing
`
`Liquid Crystal Injection
`Scribe/Break
`
`Die Attach Equipment
`
`$180K
`
`$80K
`$120K
`$35
`$120K.
`
`$560K includes cassettefcassette han-
`
`dling
`$40K
`$65
`
`$500K for both inner and outer lead
`
`TAB bonder
`
`
`Figure 2-21 Simulated yieid curves for various defect densities in TFT display
`manufacturing
`
`Yield (as;
`100 -
`
`Source: Mikkel Mfcrodevices
`
`80
`
`so
`
`4o
`
`20
`
`
`
`Display Size (Inches)
`
`104
`
`TCL 1017, Page 120
`LOWES 1017, Page 120
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 120
`
`

`

`
`CIIM'TER mo: DISH“ MANUFACTURING
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`On the left hand side of the illustration is the calculated yield vs display size line
`corresponding to 0.1 defectSICmi. This solid line is about the defect density for
`small LCD displays, like those used for calculators and watches. It is impossible
`to build large TFT displays at all with this defectdensity. The nextlevel of defects,
`0.01 defects/c1112, corresponds approximately with the current manufacturing
`practice in Japan. At this defect level, shown by the dashed line. a 10" diSplay
`yield is about 20% at best, and corresponding display pricing is $2000 each. A
`much reduced defect level, 0.003 defectsfcmg. results in a higher yield curve
`shown by the dotted line. At this defect density, the next step for TFT manufac-
`turing, a 60% yield can be obtained. This yield might be expected in the mid
`19905, and will result in an average selling price of $800.
`
`A much lower defect density, 0.001 defectsfcmz, will lead to yields in the range
`of 80% for displays, and a corresponding selling price of $500 each or less. This
`level of defects, a total of 10 defects per square meter of substrate, is a lower level
`that is currently achieved in semiconductor manufacturing. Of course, the size of
`the critical dimension in TFT manufacturing is larger, but absolute defect levels
`are much more important for displays than for integrated circuits where many
`chips are manufactured at the same time on the silicon wafer.
`
`Manufacturing Cost Model
`A manufacturing cost analysis of a high definition TV factory based on AMLCD
`displays has been presented recently. According to this analysis, substantial
`differences exist between flat panel display and IC manufacturing. A written
`presentation by G. Resor, entitled “The Surprising Economics of Flat-Panel
`Production”, was published in the Society for Information Display Technical
`Digest, p186, 1990. One of the principal differences between AMLCD and IC
`manufacturing is the optimum factory size, which is relatively small for displays
`at about 500,000 starts per year. Another difference concerns the relative
`importance of the cost of capital and materials. For integrated circuits, especially
`cost competitive products such as DRAMs, the initial investment dominates all
`other costs. For displays, the situation is quite different, and materials costs are
`dominant. Figure 2-22 shows the cost breakdown for a “minifab” with 500,000
`display starts per year. The factory productin this case is a completed 14 inch high
`definition television. The cost analysis indicates that material costs account for
`more that 50% of the total, with depreciation and R&D costs at less than 10%
`each. The factory price of $862 per completed TV applies to the fifth year after
`the start of the project, and the factory is still ramping up production. After ten
`
`10”
`TCL 1017, Page 121
`LOWES 1017, Page 121
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 121
`
`

`

`
`CHIPTER TWO: DISPLAY HAHIIFACTIJRING
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`years of operation, production costs have declined to levels competitive with
`CRT-base TV sets, but materials costs continue to dominate.
`
`
`
`
`
`HDTV “Minifab” Manufactur-
`
`Figure 2-22 Cost components of
`flat panel display production.
`
`ing Costs (5th Year of Project)
`
`
`
`Material
`
`Labor
`
`RSID
`
`Gross Profit
`
`Depreciation
`
`Other
`
`
`$862 ASP (1989 DOLLARS)
`
`Manufacturing Yield Model
`A comparison of TFT—LCD manufacturing to DRAM manufacturing reveals
`significant differences. (See R. R. Troutman, “Forecasting Array Yields for
`Large—Area TFT—LCDS”, Society for Information Display Technical Digest,
`1990. p197) Partially good displays are not acceptable, and the probability of a
`fault must be small overa large area. A Poisson distribution is used to analyze and
`predict the yield in this situation.
`
`The most common single cell fault is a pinhole short in a storage capacitor because
`of the large area of the capacitor. The resulting high leakage path produces a fixed
`ON or OFF condition, depending on voltage and polarizer settings. Another
`single cell fault is a source to drain short in the data metallization, which prevents
`charge transfer. A Poisson distribution of faults is constructed, and it is assumed
`that a few single cell faults are tolerable, as long as they are not clustered. If 10
`single cell faults are allowed, then the yield is 100% at 10 faults, about 50% at 12
`faults, and 20% at 15 faults. However. to ensure 99% yield at 10 allowable faults,
`the average number of faults has to be fewer than 5 per array.
`
`Faults other than single cell faults are intolerable, and must be repaired. If a gate
`
`”"5
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 122
`TCL 1017, Page 122
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 122
`
`

`

`(IMPTER TWO: DISPLAY ”HUFACTURIHG
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`or data line is open, it is easily detected by an electrical continuity check. Repair
`consists of laser welding a spare line driver to the initially undriven end of the line.
`
`An interlevel short is repaired by laser Cutting either the gate line or the data line
`
`and then treating the cut line as an Open line. Two types of repairability are
`described.
`
`Type 1 repairability is the case where gate line repairs are made only for open gate
`lines. In displays using the inverted staggered TF1" structure, the gate is buried
`
`under several thin film layers, and laser scribing these lines might cause a yield
`loss by itself. Data lines are more accessible, and data line repair options cover
`
`both open lines and interlevel shorts.
`
`Type 2 repairability assumes a high yielding technique for scribing gate lines in
`
`the array. Type 2 repairability is significantly better than Type 1 only when there
`are many Spare gate lines available to repair interlevel shorts.
`
`Total array yield is the product of single cell fault yield and repairable fault yield.
`lezYchrr. If the single cell fault yield can be raised to 99%, then the overall yield
`is determined by the repairable fault yield. Table 2-20 shows the relation between
`
`yield, defect size, and defect density without repairability. The calculation is
`performed for a 640x480x3 array, and assumes an average defect size of 1pm.
`
`Table 2-20 TFTArray Yt'eld Summary (No Repair)
`
`Yield
`
`10%
`
`50%
`
`90%
`
`FaultsIDisplay
`
`Faultsllcm2
`
`-
`
`2.3
`
`0.68
`
`0.10
`
`0.24
`
`0.072
`
`0.01
`
`Consider a leit DRAM line operating at 50% yield. For a chip area of 0.50m2,
`the allowable fault density is 1.5/cm2. Compare this to the value of 0.072 from the
`table, and one sees that without repair, the fault densities for a TPT array must be
`
`21 times lower thap er Qurrent DRAM mangfagtigijng.
`
`Repajrability of the data lines and gate lines can significantly improve the yields. By
`providing 5-10 extra lines for repair, the major challenge to achieving high yields is
`interlevel (crossover) shorts. This fault type must then be maintained below 1 faultfcmz.
`
`1m
`TCL 1017, Page 123
`LOWES 1017, Page 123
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 123
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER TWO: BISPLAY MAHIJFRCTURIHG
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DlSPLAYS
`
`AMLCD Factory
`The NBC Kagoshima plant in Kyushu is manufacturing 10" flat panel TFT displays,
`and has achieved 50% manufacturing yields, according to an article in the August
`1991 issue of Nikkei Microdevices. The yield might go as high as 70% in certain
`instances. The plant is inputting 5000-7500 substrates per month, which, 0n the
`300x350mm substrate, comes to a potential 10,000- 15,000 10" displays per month.
`Factoring in the yield, output is 6000-9000 displays per month.
`
`The manufacturing equipment is interconnected only where this is easy to do.
`Substrates are transported around the factory by automatic ground vehicles.
`These vehicles, which are provided with HEPA filters, are used to transport the
`heavy 20-substrate carriers, and to avoid particulate contamination which would
`OCCur if an Operator performed the transport. Operators are used to load carriers
`onto the equipment, which may be an in-line series of individual processes.
`Equipment such as for photolithography is not fully interconnected. Computers
`are used to control the operation and collect information regarding machine
`performance.
`
`NBC has made a high yield process using their LSI experience, and finds the
`process quite similar to LSI. They don‘t understand the cause of the yield
`problems in TFI‘ fabrication reported at other companies. In NEC’s opinion, the
`cell assembly processis a much stricter and more difficult to control process. The
`TFI‘ manufacturing equipment is very like the LSI processing equipment already
`in use at most companies who are making TFT‘s, and the equipment is made by
`large, reliable companies. In contrast, the equipment for cell assembly is made by
`small and medium sized companies, and may not be available.
`
`Figure 2-23 shows the floor plan of the factory. The upper floor contains the TFI‘
`panel fabrication area. This areais composed of lithography, cleaning, sputtering,
`CVD and so forth. An elevator connects this floor to the assembly area below. The
`floorspace for the clean room is 40mx90m, and the total area is 4000 m2 per floor.
`20% of the clean room is class 100, 20% is class 1000, with the rest class 10,000.
`For the lithography area, class 10 is used. In the cell assembly anea, the equipment
`and processes that generate particles, such as the rubbing equipment, are enclosed.
`
`Right now, completed TFT panels are sent downstairs, and purchased color filter
`panels are started into the cell assembly process. Module assembly, with back-
`light occupies 2000 m2 in another building.
`
`108
`
`TCL 1017, Page 124
`LOWES 1017, Page 124
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 124
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER TWO: DISPLAY MHUHCIURIHG
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Figure 2-23 NEC two story AMLCD fabrication facility layout
`
`Plasma CVD
`
`Sputten‘ng
`
`DryEtching
`
`Expansion Area
`Cleaning
`
`Inspection
`
`Seal P rinting
`
`Spacer Spraying
`
`Orientation
`FilmPnntm-
`
`Orientation
`Fllm
`Pnntin-
`
`.
`
`Assembly
`
`163.14%
`Injection
`
`mgegtion
`Sealing
`
`Panel
`
`Polarizer
`Attach
`
`Color Filter
`(Purchased)
`
`109
`
`TCL 1017, Page 125
`LOWES 1017, Page 125
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 125
`
`

`

`
`CHIPTEII TWO: DISPlAY MHUFAC'I'URIHG
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`The factory is Operated with 250 people on three shifts. In addition to the
`Operators, there are 100 additional staff, and of these, 70 are technicians. 25-26
`
`are LCD specialists, and the others are from the semiconductor process area. New
`technology transfer takes 3-6 months.
`
`The TFT area has room for expansion to 10,000 substrates per month. It has been
`converted for 10 inch panel manufacturing- New equipment was installed and
`pilot manufacturing was initiated. The biggest problem was with the lithography
`and plasma CVD equipment. Then, Nikon stepper equipment was adopted. Each
`panel requires 4 exposures. Stitching accuracy is 0.22pm. Defect inspection
`equipment has not been chosen yet. The operation rate of the equipment has
`reached LSI levels. 4 stepper lines are in operation.
`
`Anelva supplied the plasma CVD equipment for 3 lines. Due to particle buildup,
`thorough periodic maintenance is required. Uptime of 50% is achieved. There are
`3 sputtering lines and 5 dry etching lines, also from Anelva. Resist coating lines
`come from Dainippon Screen. Particle inspection equipment is from Hitachi
`Engineering.
`
`The 4096 color diSplay produced at this factory has a diagoual measurement of
`9.8", with 640xRGBx400 lines. Each color pixel measures 0.11x0.33mm2.
`Contrastis 80:1. A 20:1 contrast ratio or greater is maintained for a viewing angle
`of $20” vertical, :350 horizontal. Response speed is 20ms. Brightness is 800d!m3.
`Backlight power consumption is 12 W. TFT design employs a bottom gate
`construction, with a 2-layer, ITO/Crconstruction. Gate insulator is SiO2 plus Si3N4
`deposited by plasma CVD. Gate line and data line metal is chromium, and
`
`transparent electrode is ITO. The gate electrode, channel, dielectrics and so forth
`are dry etched. Defective pixels number 10 or less in completed displays.
`Defective blue pixels are most easily detected, and two defective blue pixels can
`reject the entire display. As the level of cleanliness of the clean room improves,
`the defect level is expected to decrease.
`
`110
`
`TCL 1017, Page 126
`LOWES 1017, Page 126
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 126
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER TWO: DISPLAY MNUFICTURING
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`REFERENCES
`
`
`1 . F. Okamoto, “Glass S ubstrates forLiquid Crystal Displays”, Technical Proceedings, SEMICON
`Kansai 1990. SEMI, 1990, p380.
`
`2. J. Makino, "Glass Substrates for Flat Panel Display," Technical Proceedings, SEMICON
`Kansai 1991, SEMI, 1991. p111.
`
`3. From "Liquid Crystal Displays, 1990", Nikkei Business Publications, Tokyo, 1990.
`
`4. A. Tarnada, "West Process Equipment for LCD", Technical Proceedings, SEMICONI’Kansai
`1991. SEMI Japan. 1991. p460.
`
`S. Tamada, ibid, p465,
`
`6. RJ. Saia, RF. Kwasnick, and CY. Wei, "Selective Reactive Ion Etching of ITO in a
`Hydrocarbon Gas Mixture", J. Electrochem. Soc. 138. 493 (1991).
`
`7. S. lshibashi et a1, "1.0X10-4Q-cm ITO Films by Magnetron Sputtering", presented at the first
`International Conference on Sputtering and Plasma Processing, (Tokyo) Japan, February, 1991.
`
`8. S. Takaki et 31., "Preparation of Highly Conducting ITO Electrodes on Color Filters by Highly
`Dense Plasma-Assisted EB Evaporation", Society for Informatioa Display Technical Digest,
`1990, p?6.
`
`9. WJ. Latham and D.W. Hawley, "Color Filters from Dyed Polyimidcs", Solid State Technol-
`ogy, May 1988.
`
`10. S. Nemoto, "Color Filters for Liquid Crystal Display". Technical Proceedings, Semieom'
`Kansai 91 FPD Seminar, p162, 1991.
`
`11. Michael Goldowsky, Economical Color Filter Fabrication for LCDs by EIectro-Mist Depo-
`sition, Society for Information Display Technical Digest, 1990, p80.
`
`12. A. Tamada, op. cit. p460.
`
`13. Y. Oana, "Technical Developments and Trends in A-Si I'l1'1'-LCDs" Flat Panel Display
`Process Tutorial, Semicon West. May 23, 1991.
`
`14. El . Henley and G. Addiego, "In-line Functional Inspection and Repair Methodology During
`LCD Panel Fabrication". Society for Information Display Technical Digest, 1991, p686.
`
`15. J. Vanney, "Automated Equipment Considerations for Liquid Crystal Display Production",
`Electronic Imaging. Science and Technology: Feb. 11-16, 1990, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
`
`16. K. Adachi, "Packaging Technology for LCD", SEMICONI’Kansai Technical Proceedings
`1991, Semi Japan, 1991, p119.
`
`17. K.J . Hathaway et. al., “New Backlighting Technologies for LCDs", Society for Information
`Display Technical Digest 1991, p751.
`
`lll
`TCL 1017, Page 127
`LOWES 1017, Page 127
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 127
`
`

`

`CHAPTER THREE; PRODUCT HATERIAIS
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Materials for Flat Panel Displays
`
`The particulars of materials for flat panel displays are presented in this part of the
`book, emphasizing the unique requirements for active matrix displays. In many
`cases, the ultimate combination of materials performance, quality and price has
`
`not yet been achieved. Particularly for color filters, significant cost reduction is
`essential for high volume manufacturing. For other materials, cost effectiveness
`
`is determined primarily by beneficial effects on transistor manufacturing yield.
`
`Glass Substrates
`
`m
`
`Glass substrates of various types are used for liquid crystal displays. Substrate
`types were discussed in Part 2, with emphasis on fusion glass as an active matrix
`substrate. This section describes float glass manufacturing and ITO deposition.
`
`Advantages of float glass material were pointed out in a recent article by Pilkington
`
`Micronics [1]. Flat glass was made by drawing processes until the advent of the
`
`float process, in which molten glass is allowed to settle onto a bath of molten tin.
`The glass achieves a uniform thickness with smooth surfaces on both sides.
`
`Stringent glass specifications are required for LCD applications in spite of the fact
`
`that this constitutes less than 1% of the world-wide flat glass market.
`
`Some difficulty in obtaining the tolerances on glass properties, especially surface
`
`smoothness, arose from processing float glass for LCDs in the same furnaces used
`for architectural and other purposes. These furnaces might have a production
`capacity of 5000 tons per week, enough to satisfy the world market for LCD
`applications in a few days. By moving the float glass manufacturing for LCDs to
`
`a small dedicated float line, materials specifications were improved.
`
`Float lines can produceB meterwide continuous ribbons with thickness variations
`of i0. lum, negligible warp, and microcorrugation controlled to averages of less
`than 0.1mm. On-line CVD processes are also used by this glass manufacturer to
`provide SiO2 coated surfaces. Characterization of microroughness will allow
`classification of substrates, and reduced polishing of selected classes of glass can
`be achieved for STN applications. Eventually, float glass suppliers hope to
`
`eliminate the polishing process completely.
`
`..
`
`TCL 1017, Page 128
`LOWES 1017, Page 128
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 128
`
`

`

`CHIPTER THREE: PRODUCT HATEIIMIS
`
`LIQUID CRYSRAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Processing the base glass substrate into a form useful to the display manufacturer
`is a multi—step process, with several Japanese firms offering services ateach step.
`Table 3-1 shows the types of operations for LCD glass and suppliers at each step.
`Processes for SiO2 and ITO coating are indicated. Various glass fabricators
`supply material to several firms for cutting and polishing. SiO2 coating may be
`done be another firm, and ITO by a fourth.
`
`Table 3-1 LCD Glass Supplier Matrix in Japan
`
`
`
`
`
` Bare Glass Cutting/Polishing SiO2 Coating ITO Coating
`
`Asahi Glass
`
`Kuramoto
`
`Matsuzaki
`
`Matsuzaki
`
`NSG
`
`Fujimi
`
`Central Glass
`
`Mitsum
`
`(dipping)
`Tokyo Ohka
`(dipping)
`Kuramoto
`
`(sputter & evap.)
`Asahi Glass
`(sputter & cvap.)
`Sanyo Shinku‘
`
`N.E.G.
`
`N.E.G.
`
`Asahi
`
`(BLC & OAZ types)
`
`Corning
`
`I'I'O Sputtering
`
`(sputter)
`NSG
`
`CVD Central
`
`Seiko Epson
`
`Sharp
`
`Optrex
`
`Sputter
`
`* 100% Sharp subsidiary
`
`ITO sputtering is a crucial and ubiquitous part of the flat panel display industry.
`The material is deposited from a sintered powder source to a thickness of
`1500-3500A. Important deposited film properties are transparency, resistivity,
`and ease of patterning. Transmittance of 90% and resistivity of 1-3ttohm~cm are
`normal values for these properties. These are a sensitive function of the oxygen
`content of the film, and oxygen is often added in the gas stream during sputtering,
`to make up for any loss of oxygen during transport from the ITO target to the glass
`substrate. Deposition temperature is a critical parameter of the process.
`
`The higher the deposition temperature, the lower the resistivity of the film.
`
`Previously, a glass substrate temperature of 300°C was common for ITO depo-
`
`114
`
`TCL 1017, Page 129
`LOWES 1017, Page 129
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 129
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER THREE: PRODUCT HITERIILS
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`sition, but 200°C is necessary for color LCD displays, where the polymer color
`filters cannot withstand the higher temperature. Lower temperature deposition
`has been made possible by the new, higher density targets, which can provide
`uniform deposition at higher magnetic fields than the previous model, which
`allows for lower deposition temperatures. Table 3-2 shows film properties of
`deposited films. Ulvac has described a process for low temperature sputter
`deposition which provides resistivities as low as 5 QIsquare.
`
`Table 3-2 ITO Film Properties
`
`
`
`
` Deposition Conditions ResistivityfResistance Application
`
`350°C, 1000A, e-beam
`
`1.5x10-4 ohmicm
`
`131w STN ~20 ohm!
`
`or sputtering
`200°C, 1000A. e-beam
`sputter
`
`2x104 ohmicm
`
`square
`Color Filter (requires or
`2000A for 10 ohm;
`
`square)
`As low as 5 ohm/square
`Ulvac - new system
`is possible at low temp-
`200°C sputter
`erature for color filter
`
`1.2x“ ohmlcm
`
`ITO targets are usually prepared in the form of rectangles about 15"x5" in size,
`about 6 mm thick. The material is usually cold-pressed, then sintered after
`isostatic pressing. Usual composition of the target is 10 wgt% SnOz. After ma-
`chining to the correct final size and shape, the ITO material is bonded to a backing
`plate using some form of indium or indium alloy bonding preform. Table 3-3
`shows the currently available target densities available from suppliers. The higher
`density material is more difficult to prepare, but provides longer target life and
`fewer deposited InO black particles.
`
`Table 3-3 Characteristics ofITO Targets
`
`Target Life
`InO
`(using high density life
`black particles
`Density
`as ~100%)
`
`
`Low (70%)
`
`Medium (80%)
`
`High (95%)
`
`most
`
`some
`
`fewest
`
`70%
`
`80%
`
`~100%
`
`11?
`TCL 1017, Page 130
`LOWES 1017, Page 130
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 130
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER THREE: PRODUCT EMERIILS
`
`LIQUID CRYSRAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Sputtering processes consist of bombarding a material such as ITO with energetic
`argon ions. These ions dislodge atoms from the target, and these atoms travel to
`the substrate under the influence of electric and magnetic fields. If the composi-
`tion of the target is non-uniform, less desirable results can occur. These include
`
`non-uniform sputtering across the target, which shortens its useful life. In addition,
`non-uniform density or composition can lead to absorbing particle formation.
`
`The rectangular target is used in large batch or in-Iine sputtering equipment made
`by a variety of suppliers in Japan, including Ulvac, the largest commercial
`supplier, Anelva, Asahi Glass (makes equipment for their own use), and Shinku
`Kikai. For very large systems, the targets can be used two at a time, forming a one
`meter long sputtering source. Glass panels have a wide range of sizes, both
`because many products may be prepared in a single factory, and also because no
`standard sizes have been developed by the manufacturers.
`
`Erosion of the target by the sputtering process is not uniform, and an elliptical
`cavity is etched out more or less in the center of the rectangle. Because a lot of ITO
`is left in an unusable form at the end of life of the target, and because the material
`is somewhat expensive, there is some interest in reclaiming the targets.
`
`Film properties may be enhanced by annealing in air after deposition. S ubsequent
`patterning and etching forms the transparent electrodes whose function was
`discussed in the previous section.
`
`ITO Sputtering is mostly done by glass coaters, primarily Matsuzaki Shinku and
`Asahi Glass. Glass can be supplied in coated form, except for the panels used for
`the active matrix TFT backplane. These are ITO coated after transistor fabrica-
`tion, and this will be done internally at the display manufacturer.
`
`Requirements for glass type, ITO thickness and other parameters vary according
`to the type of display being produced. Table 3-4 is a summary of the types of
`displays, ITO resistivity, deposition methods, and type of substrate.
`
`3.2.1 ITO POWDER AND THIN FILM PROPERTIES
`
`ITO targets depend on powder formulations of consistent particle size and shape,
`as well as adequate purity. Powder sources are Nippon Mining and Mitsui Metal
`Mining, with some material produced by Dowa Mining and Osaka Asahi Metals,
`and perhaps Sumitomo Metal Mining for internal use. Nippon Mining and
`
`116
`
`TCL 1017, Page 131
`LOWES 1017, Page 131
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 131
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER THREE: PRODUCT MATERIALS
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Table 3-4 Glass Substrates for Liquid Ciystal Displays
`
`
`Application
`
`ITO Deposition
`Resistivity
`(ohm-cm)
`Method
`
`
`Substrate Type
`
`100-200
`
`15-100
`
`10
`
`10
`
`Soda-lim e, SiO2
`coated
`Soda-lime, SiO2
`coated
`Soda—lime, SiO2
`coated
`Low-expansion
`
`TN
`(twisted nematic)
`STN
`(supertwist)
`STN (newer type)
`
`Active Matrix
`
`Electron Beam
`(200°C)
`Electron Beam
`(300°C)
`Sputter
`(300°C)
`Spotter
`(300°C)
`Low-expansion
`Spotter
`10
`Color filter
`(<200°C)
`
`MitsuiMining may sell a portion of their powder production for outside use, and
`Tosoh is currently buying powder from one of them. But each of these is concentrat-
`ing on the target market.
`
`Typical properties of ITO target material are shown in Table 3-5.
`
`Matsuzaki Shinku is the primary glass coater in Japan, and uses equipment made
`by Shinku Kikai. Asahi Glass makes their own equipment- Neither Shinku Kikai
`nor Asahi attempts to make the target material. This is in contrast to the older
`technology of sputtering ITO from indium-tin metal alloy targets, using an
`oxygen ambient as the source of oxygen in the film. In that case, the user could
`make his own target in a crucible by melting the proper amounts of metal. The
`other supplier of equipment of note is Ulvac. with a captive target supplier, VMC.
`VMC is the largest supplier of targets for the semiconductor industry in Japan, but
`is just beginning ITO target development.
`
`Other Sputtering Materials
`
`E
`
`Metals used for TFI‘ fabrication are deposited by sputtering, using similar or
`identical equipment as for ITO. Chromium is used for black matrix formation on
`the color filter portion of the display in most Current processes. For TFT
`
`117
`
`TCL 1017, Page 132
`LOWES 1017, Page 132
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 132
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER THREE: PRODUCT HATERIMS
`
`LIQUID CRYSRAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Table 3-5 Specifications for High Density ITO Target
`
`
`
`
` Property Value
`
`Composition
`Actual Density
`Percent Theoretical Density
`Bulk Resistivity
`Thermal Conductivity
`Tensile Strength
`Bonding Material
`Bond Void Ratio
`
`Deposited Film Properties
`Thickness
`
`10 Wgt% SnO2
`6.07 gmm’cm3
`95% ,
`0.22 mohm-crn
`19.55 mcall’cm-sec°C
`12.8 lrg/mm2
`In, InISn, Im‘Bi
`<2.0%
`
`1500-2500013
`
`<20 ohm/square
`Resistivity
`
`Optical Transmission >85%
`
`manufacturing, the materials choices are aluminum, tantalum, molybdenum,
`tungsten or other refractory metals for the gate lines. Seurce and drain metalliza-
`tion is primarily aluminum, with underlayers of molybdenum or other refractory
`for diffusion barriers. Themetallurgy of thin film transistors was described in Part
`2. Other than the form factor of the sputtering target, requirements for these metals
`appear to be identical to those for semiconductor applications. Also mentioned in
`Part 2 is research to develop sputterwdeposition of silicon for the thin film
`transistor material itself.
`
`Color Filters
`
`Color filter applications began with manufacture of pocket sized TV which
`appeared on the market in the mid-1980’s. The filter was made by the dye method,
`and its spectral properties equalled those of the CRT [2]. This method and its
`companion, pigment dispersion, were scaled to meet the size requirements of
`notebook computers. Required properties of color filter material include those
`shownin Table 3-6. Color filter materials such as dyes and pigments are supplied
`by companies such as Dainippon Paint, Dainippon Ink and so forth. Specialized
`formulations of polyimide with dissolved colorants are available from Toray and
`Brewer Science.
`
`118
`
`TCL 1017, Page 133
`LOWES 1017, Page 133
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 133
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER THREE: PRODUCT HATERIILS
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Table 3-6 Properties of Color Filters
`
`
`
` Property Comment
`
`Spectral property
`
`Colors of red, blue and green filters
`
`should be
`
`Contrast ratio
`Uniformity
`
`Flatness
`
`Defects
`
`close to CIE chromaticity of CRT
`
`Loss of light should be minimal
`Spectral properties should be uniform across the
`
`Surface of the array
`No foreign objects or projections. (most
`severe restriction on STN filters, i0.lttm)
`No foreign object, pin-hole, crack or dirt
`
`Dimensional accuracy
`Thermal stability
`
`Sufficient to align substrates easily
`Resistant to cell sealing and polarirer application
`
`Chemical resistance
`
`process (250°C, 1hr target)
`No discoloration, swelling, separation or creasing
`during cleaning or ITO etching processes.
`
`Reliability
`
`Temperature extremes and thermal shock
`
`(80°C to -30°C). and temperaturefhumidity lesis
`
`tance (40°C + 95% RH)
`
`Light stability
`
`Resistant to bleaching in ambient light
`
`Test conditions for color filters are summarized in Table 3-1
`
`3.4.1 DYE METHOD
`
`Presently the dyeing method is the most widely used technique. Its materials and
`processes are both well established, with reproducible spectral properties. How-
`
`ever, the use of dyes and water soluble polymers as binders pose some problems,
`resulting in poor resistance to heat, light, and chemicals. The way around this
`results in increased process complexity. Patterning and dyeing of each color plus
`other steps such as substrate cleaning and drying result in a process with a total
`
`of 40-50 steps of various types. For example, the water soluble polymer such as
`gelatin is made photosensitive, exposed with UV light, and then the pattern is
`
`developed. This sequence is accomplished using equipment similar to the pho-
`tolithography equipment in the semiconductor industry. Next, the relief pattern
`
`is dyed by acid or reactive dyes. Because the optical density of the dye is
`influenced by the degnee of polymerization of the resin, and because the film
`
`thickness varies depending on the dyeing process, control is necessary for each
`
`11
`TCL 1017, Page 134
`LOWES 1017, Page 134
`
`LOWES 1017, Page 134
`
`

`

`
`CHAPTER THREE: PRODUCT HATERIMS
`
`LIQUID CRYSRAL FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS
`
`Table 3-7 Test Conditions for Color Filters
`Test m Treatment Condition
`
`Oven
`
`ISO-200°C, 1hr
`80°C. 500hr
`
`Thermal stability
`Thermal stability
`
`(long term)
`
`Thermal Shock
`
`Light stability
`
`Chemical resistance
`
`Environmental
`
`80°C, 50hr
`
`-30-80°C, .5hr 20 cycles
`
`Testing Machine
`
`40°C, 95%RH, 420m:
`
`IPA
`
`Xylene
`
`Butyl Acetate
`
`Butyl Lactate
`
`NaOH (5%)
`
`H2804 (5%)
`H2O
`IP
`3:-
`
`H20
`"U
`
`I F
`
`luorocarbon
`
`200-500 hr
`
`Dipping
`10—30min
`
`
`
`60°C. 30min
`
`Supersonic
`Wave 5min
`
`Vapor
`5min
`
`dye lot, its stability over time, and its optical density. Some investigation is being
`made to replace the water soluble resin with acrylic resin. In order to prevent the
`mixing of colors, it is possible to use an intermediate hardening step after each
`filter is formed

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket