throbber
THE LANCET
`
`No 8625
`
`BOSTON, MASS. AND LONDON· SATURDAY DECEMBER 17 1988
`
`VOL II FOR 1988
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLES
`Ocular Fundus Lesions in Divers
`P. ]. Polkinghome, FRACP, Kulwant SehnU, FRPS, M. R. Cross, MB,
`Darwin Minassian, FRCS, Prof A. C. Bird, FRCS
`
`Allele Loss on Short Arm of Chromosome 17 In Breast Cancers
`]. Mackay, FRCS, C. M. St«I, MRCPE, P.A. Elder, HNC,
`Sir Patrick Forrest, FRCS, ProfH. J. Evans, PHO
`
`Support for Adrenaline-hypertension Hypothesis: 18 hour Pressor Effect
`after 6 hours Adrenaline Infusion
`P. J. Blankestijn, MD, A. J. Man in't Veld, MD, Joke Tulen, B SC,
`A.H. ven den Meiracker, PH o, Frans Boomsma, PH o, Peter Moleman, PH o,
`H.J. Ritscrna van Eck, MD, F. H. M. Derlcx, MD, Paul Mulder, PH o,
`S. ]. Lambens, MD, M.A. D. H. Schalelwnp, MD
`
`Simultaneous Isolation of HIV-I and HIV-2 from an AIDS Patient
`L. A. Evans, PH o, Jacques Moreau, MD, Koudou Odehouri, MD, Deborah Seto, BA,
`Graeme Thomson-Honnebier, MD, Harold Legg, BA, Ashley Barboza, BA,
`Cecilia Oleng-Mayer, PH D, Prof J. A. Levy, MD
`
`Improvement of Hepatic Encephalopathy Treated with Flumazenil
`Georg Grinun, MD, Peter Fercnci, MD, Regina Katzenschlager, Olristian Madi,
`Bruno Schneeweiss, MD, A. N. Laggner, MD, Kun Lenz, MD, Prof Alfred Gangl, MD
`
`1381
`
`1384
`
`1386
`
`1389
`
`1392
`
`PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION
`Remission Induction in
`Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma with
`Reshaped Human Monoclonal
`AntibodyCAMPATil-IH
`G. Hale, PH o,
`M. J. S. Dyer, MRCP,
`M. R. Oark, PH o,
`]. M. Phillips, PH D,
`R. Marcus, MRC PATH,
`L. Riechmann, PH o,
`G. Winter, PHO,
`H. Waldmann,MtD
`
`1394
`
`REVIEWS
`Notices of Books
`
`GENERAL PRAcnCE
`EvaluadonofaStructured
`Treatment and Teaching
`Programme on
`Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes
`Peter Kronsbein, PH o,
`Viktor Jorgens, MD,
`Ingrid Miihlhauser, MD,
`Vera Scholz, PH D,
`Annene Venhaus, MS,
`Prof Michael Berger, MD
`
`1399
`
`1407
`
`THERAPEUTICS
`Reversible Ceftriaxone(cid:173)
`associated Biliary Pseudolithiasis
`in Children
`U. B. Schaad, MD,
`Joanna Wedgwood-Krucko, .\\0,
`Heinz Tschaeppeli;r, MD
`
`1411
`
`HOSPITAL PRAGnCE
`Nasal Continuous Positive
`Airway Pressure In
`- ~
`Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia 1414
`Steven Kesten, FRcrc,
`A. S. Rebuck, FRCPC
`
`ROUND TIIE WORLD
`India
`
`IN ENGLAND NOW
`
`1415
`
`1416
`
`XamoteroI: Stabilising the
`Cardiac Beta Receptor?
`Shackled, Shameful, and
`Shoddy
`Valproate, Spina Bifida, and
`Binh Defect Registries
`Diurnal Variation in Platelet
`Aggregation Responses
`Recurrent Respiratory
`Papillomatosis
`
`1403
`
`1404
`
`1406
`
`1407
`
`1408
`
`1417
`
`1418
`
`1418
`
`1419
`
`1419
`
`1420
`
`1421
`
`LETIERS TO TIIE EDITOR
`Reversed Polarity of Vasculocutaneous
`Potential and Neonatal Nccrotislnc
`Enterocolltls
`Dr M . R. Millar and others
`Haemodllution In Renal
`Transplantation in Patients on
`Erythropoietln
`Dr Jan Wahlberg and others
`Treatments for Neurotic Dborders
`Prof D. F. Klein
`Ucensing Synthetic lntracervlcal Tents 1418
`Mr Nicholas JohnS<lCl, MRCX>G
`Birthwdght and Neonatal Monallty
`Dr Alfredo Pisacanc
`Food Intolerance and Rheumatoid
`Arthritis
`Dr Pekka Kurki and others;
`Prof L. Corbec:I and others
`Changes In Body Wdght between
`Consecutive Pregnancies
`Dr J. S. Samra and others
`Salmonella -teritidi• Phage Type 4
`and Hens' Eggs
`Dr John Paul,
`Dr Barry Batchelor
`O.olinergic Side-elTecu of
`Tetrabydroaminoacridinc
`ProfR2ymond Uvy
`Peripheral Facial Paralysis Indicating
`HIV lnrection
`Dr Laurent &lee and Olhers
`HIV, Glue Ear, and Adenoidal
`Hypertrophy
`Mr J. W. Fairley, FRCS, and others
`Cat Scratch Disease, Bartonellosls,
`and Kaposi Sarcoma
`Dr S. Dcaller
`Inhibition of O.olinesterasn by
`Pentarnldinc
`Dr T. A. Alston
`
`1421
`
`1421
`
`1422
`
`1422
`
`1423
`
`Italian Epidemic orW•terbornc
`Tulancmi8
`Dr E. Mignani and others
`Home lntravmous lmmunoglobulin
`Therapy
`Dr H. M. O>apcl,
`Sister V. M. Brennan
`Is Inactivated Poliovacclne more
`Expensive?
`Dr J.P. Moulia-Pdat and others
`Heat-suable vcnus Heat-labile
`Vaccines
`Dr C. P. Muller,
`Prof Giinthcr Jung
`Marlagmimt of Dysentery by
`Community Health Worken
`Dr Manin Kirl<patrick
`Antibody Responses to Human
`Herpcsvirus 6 and other
`Herpcsvlruses
`Dr D. ] . Morris and others;
`Dr Martin Andre,
`Dr lkrtfncd Matz
`Parvovlrus-associated
`Thrombocytopenic Purpura
`Dr N. K. Foreman and others
`Clinical Trial Numben and
`Confidence Intervals of
`Pre-specified Sitt
`Mr S. J. Day, FSS
`Danish Exp.rim« of Suatutory Right
`or Patients to Access to Hospital
`Records
`Dr T eis Andcnen
`Dr Georg Jergmsm
`Better Surgeons get Better Results
`Mr Richard Novell, FRCS, and othcn
`Paying for Extended Medicare
`Dr Brian Potter
`ICRF Appeals
`Dr L. A. l'lia:
`Graves' DiseaK: the Thyroid not the
`Pancras
`Prof]. G. Scadding
`Specific Detection of r.,,;,, MJ6inata
`Eggs by DNA Hybridisation
`Dr A. Flisscr and others
`Non-$urglcal Lefi-atrial Aonic Bypass
`Dr U. U. Babic and others
`Screening for Aortic Aneurysm
`Mr Jack Collin, FRCS
`Pelvic Irradiation and Tamoxlfm as
`Risk Facton for Carcinoma or
`Corpus Uteri
`Dr l..amart Hardell
`Erythromycln-raistant Streptococcw
`tm-monitM
`Dr J. Vttha<gm and Olhers;
`Dr R. E. Wanm and others
`Naevus of Jamaica
`Dr Ncjat Akar
`
`1423
`
`1423
`
`1424
`
`1424
`
`1425
`
`1425
`
`1426
`
`1427
`
`1428
`
`1428
`
`1429
`
`1429
`
`1429
`
`1429
`
`1430
`
`1431
`
`1432
`
`1432
`
`1433
`
`MEDICINE AND 1llE LAW
`O>smetic Surgery: Greater Duty to
`Warn of Risks
`Doctors and Advertising
`
`NOTES AND NEWS
`MRC Activities-Official
`Spare a Thought for the Victim
`Help for Sick Doctors
`After the Olrisanas Pany
`C.ancer Incidence World Wide
`Women's Health Concern
`Healers, Quacks, and Lady Doctors
`Postgraduate Education
`Training Courses for HIV/AIDS
`Counsellors
`
`CORREGnON
`Fetal Obstructi~e Uropathy
`
`1434
`1434
`
`1435
`1435
`1435
`1435
`1435
`1436
`1436
`1436
`
`1436
`
`1436
`
`uarc, London WCIB 3SL, England. Tel:
`Editorial Offi«: 46 Bedford
`01-436 4981. The Lan=, North American Edition ISSN 0099-5355
`published wttltly by Llnlc, Brown and Company, 34 Beacon St., Boston,
`Mass. 02108. Annual individual subscription in U.S. 185.00, in Canada
`S95.00; resident and intern rate (U.S. and Canada) $48.50; Single copy $7.00.
`Second class postage paid at Boston, Ma .. ., and"' additional mailing offices.
`!) The Lancet Lld., 17 Dcconber 1988. Postmaster: Send address changes
`to The Lan=, 34 Beacon St, Boston, Mass. 02108 (617) 227-0730, ext 516.
`lliE WHOLEOFTilE 1..llCRARY .\\ATJCR IN THE LANCET IS COPYRIGHT
`
`0189 1289LI SC IP 0400~~ °'f8
`SCRIPPS C~INIC hfS FDTH:'\)".W. l
`·i~~~~LT5R~·~R INES DEC:::~ 1988
`LA J3LLA
`CA
`92037
`DO NOT REMOV~j
`
`1 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1132
`
`

`

`1394
`
`Discussion
`This study is the largest experience to date with the
`bcnzodiazcpine antagenist flwnazcnil in the treatment of
`HE. The effects of the drug were assessed clinically and by
`SEP recordings. The late components of cortical SEPs
`(peaks X3 and P3) appear to be highly sensitive indicators of
`cortical dysfuiiction in HE.11 The results indicate that
`Oumazcnil may improve the HE that complicates both acute
`and chronic liver failure. Flumazenil treatment was
`IS30ciated with improvement in neurological status in 60%
`of episodes of HE; with one exception improvement
`occurred within a few minutes to an hour of drug
`administration. The speed of these responses contrasts with
`the interval of several hours that is typically necessary before
`HE improves after conventional therapies. The response co
`flumazcnil in bcmodiazcpine intoxication is also very
`rapid.19
`The 60% improvement rate may even underesr.imate the
`potential efficacy of flumazeni.I in the treatment of HE since
`most of the patients in this study had been cncephalopathic
`for many days before flumazenil treatment and had not
`responded to conventional therapy. Furthermore all 5
`patients with clinical evidence of increased intracranial
`pressure due to brain oedema did not respond to flwnazerul.
`l of these patients improved after treatment with mannitol.
`The remaining 4 died within 3 days of flumazcnil
`administration.
`In 8 of the 12 episodes rcponding to flumaz.cnil there was
`an exacerbation of HE 0·5-4 h after stopping treatment,
`This transient effect of the drug is consistent with its
`phannacokinctics.'°.z1 To achieve a sustained response
`continuous administration of the dn:~ over lonecr period~
`may be necessary. Although these 12 episodes unproved, no
`patient regained normal brain function at the end of
`treatment. The possibility that larger doses or a longer
`duration of treatment would have achieved complete
`improvement seems unlikely since, in bcnzodiazcpine
`intoxication, much lower doses are sufficient for recovery. 11
`In addition an increased GABA-crgic tone may be only one
`of many abnormalities of brain function in patients with
`liver failure and correction of this particular abnormality
`may therefore induce incomplete improvement.
`The mechanism by which flwnazcnil improves HE is
`uncertain. One possibility is displaccmcnt of an endogenous
`bcnzodiazcpinc-like
`from
`substance
`the GABA"(cid:173)
`bcnzodiazcpine receptor. The prcscncc of such a substance
`was suggested in the brains of animals with HE and in
`cerebrospinal fluid of patients dying with HE. 21
`This srudy was supponed by the Fonds zur FOrdcnina der wwcn·
`schaftlichcn Fonchung (P 6169 M). Flwnaunil was provided by Hoffmann(cid:173)
`La Roche, Basel, Swilzerland.
`Corttspondcnce should be oddttsscd to G. G., 1st Oepanmmt of
`Medicine, Uruvcniry of Vimn11, A-1090 Vimnll, Ausma.
`
`REFERENCES
`I. Scllafcr OF,P-SC, llndy LE,Jacol>I R,JonaEA. v...i~pounuab ona
`nbbol modd o( ._ mcephalopolhy I. _ . . . -..... Ind mmponsara
`wilh dtuc lnduc.d ........ ~ 1984;"' 540-45.
`2 Basil< AS, Ganvnal SH, Mullen KD, Jones EA, SkoWd< P. DilTcr<naal
`mponlivmcss o( ocr<bdlu: Pur!Onj< ncun>n> to GABA and bcnzodiazopu><
`r«<pcor bpnds in m orurnal modd olbcpobc: mcopbolopolhy. JN- 1988;1:
`2414--21.
`3. Scharer OF, Jones EA H<poac mcq>halopodly and 1h< y~...ad
`ncwocnnsrrumr ,,_.., ~ 11182; ii: 1&-.:IO.
`4. Paul SM, Ma..,..,. PJ, Skolnd P. Tbt ~-<hloride ionophote
`r«<pcor complct: ......-lite oCnunor innquilliza ection. Biol l'rycJr 1981; 16:
`213-29
`
`THEu.NCET,DECEMBER 17, 1988
`
`Preliminary Communication
`
`REMISSION INDUCTION IN NON-HODGKIN
`LYMPHOMA WI1H RESHAPED HUMAN
`MONOO..ONAL ANTIBODY CAMPA Til-lH
`
`G. HALE'
`M. R. ()JJu{I
`R MARcus2
`G. WrNTER1
`
`M. J. S. DYER2
`J.M. PHILLIPS'
`L. RIElliMA.NN1
`H. WALDMANN'
`
`/Rparrmnus of Palho/ogy1 and Haanarology,' Unn.'C'siry of
`Cambridge, and Labortllory of Mokcu/ar Biology,> Cambridge
`
`Summary
`
`A genetically reshaped human IgG l
`monoclonal antibody (CAMPATI-1-lH.
`was used
`to treat two patients with non-Hodgkin
`lymphoma. Doses of 1-20 mg daily were given
`intravenously for up to 43 days. In both patients lymphoma
`cells were cleared from the blood and bone marrow and
`splenomegaly resolved. One patient had lymphadenopathy
`which also resolved. These effects were achieved without
`myelosuppression, and normal haemopocisis was restored
`during the course of treaonent, partially in one patient and
`complctdy in the other. No antiglobulin response was
`detected in either patient. CAMPATI-1-lH is a potent
`lympholytic antibody which might have an important use in
`the
`treatment of lymphoprolifcrative disorders and
`additionally as an immunosuppressive agent.
`
`G. GRIMM AND OTHERS; REFERENa;.s....coruinwd
`
`5. Banldi M, Zenaoti ML, VaalW'll E, n al. Supmcnsiliviry o( bauodilzq>ane
`m:ep«>n in hq>oac aaaphalopelhy due to fulnunan1 bepotic failure in 1h< n1.
`r<venoJ by • bauodiaz<pine -
`Clut So 1984; 67: 167-~.
`6 BauettML.Mullm KD,Skolrud<P,nal~o(hq>oacmcephalopolhyby
`phumoo:)lopc .,_...,. oC 1h< GABA•~ re<:<J*lr canplot., a
`rabbttmoddofl\olminomhq>ouc faalutt. a.,,,_,,.oloo 1987;'3: 1069-77.
`7. 8ansky G, Mdcr PJ, Ziegler WH, Walser H, Sdvrud M, Huber M. Rev<nal of
`hepoDc coma by bcnzodiazepu>e Wlaiconi>t (Ro I 5rl788~ U..:n 1985; i• I 32+-25
`8 BanslyG,MacrPJ,RiedeftrE,nal Ell'<aola~-nbepooc
`mcephalopolhy.,--. H'PO'olao 1987; 7: 1103
`9. S<olJo.t....vw.n G, Suwvnonn E. Revenal ol hq>ooc coma by -_ , .
`anusonist (Ro 15rl788). lanu1 1985; i: 1324.
`10. Bwte DA, Milchdl KW, Al Mardini H, R<a>rd CO Rev<na1 o(hepobc coma Wldl
`Oumazmil .,........,..,...,,., an V>IUll ~ pocmaals. lanul 1988; ii:~
`11 Su!herbnd LR, M....ia GY. Ro 15rl788 and hepobc ~A- I"''"' Mal 1988,
`IOI: 158.
`12 Gnmm G, L<ni K, KJe.nberl<f G, n al. Ro I Sri 788 unprovcs coma on ~ out of 5
`peomts with fulmananl hcpabC Ca.turc": vcnficaoon by b\a; latency auditory and
`soma1osauory po<mtiab. J H•paUJ/ 1987; 4 (suppl I): S21.
`tl Mt... R, Gyr K. Traanen1o(hepoo< <ne<phalopotlay (HE) Wllh the btluodmepone
`.._.,. fNmazcrul: a plo< S<Udy. £w J A_,,ltnoo/ 1988; suppl 2 t l9-46
`14 T.....W. G, Jmnm B Assesvnaat o( 1X1ma and tmpaaml a>nsc:IOU>ll<SS a pncoaJ
`scale. lanut 1974; u: 81-1!4.
`15. Conn HO, Liebenhal M. Tbt hepotic 1X1ma syndromn and lactuloK. Baltimo«:
`Vlllilms & Wil<inl, 1979: 6.
`16. Cnao RQ, Bodlf.Wolner I, <do. Fronlim o( dinocal """"*"""' Voll evoked
`poc- New Yon:: Alm R. Lm, 1966.
`17. ) - HH. Tbt tal/twa>ty ekarodc .,....... oC 1h< I~ Fcdcnoon.
`~ClatN~1958; 10:371-75.
`18. Olu NS, Yq SS. Ponal-symnuc cnaphalopolhy: ahcrations in~ and
`bninsccm audnory evoked pocentials. J Nnmll So 1988; 14: 41-'°
`19 l'n5dU F, Donner A, Grimm G, t1 al Value o( flumazaul ., bauodiaupone
`ldf-poiooralns. M.J T.....i 1988;): 334-)9.
`:10 L>staR,Gr.<nl>llnD,AbemoihyD,nall'bam-....oc""'1ia..,ROl5rt788,a
`bcNodiueptne ._ lipnd, in tbebninol,._ B,.,,Ro 1984;J90l ls:Hl6.
`21. Roncanli G,ZiqlcrWH,GumienTW. --oltbencwbauodiaupine
`°"' ~ 19961ll:421-:IS.
`._m Ro 15rl788 in,,_ followinc inlrwv<nousand onl ldminio<nDan. Br J
`22. Mullen KD, M1r1111 JV, -WB ,n al Could., mdopnoul bcnmdiaz<pln<
`........ """"-., bepotic cna:pbalopodry? Lanut 1988; i: 457-59.
`
`2 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1132
`
`

`

`THE U..-.:CET,DECEMBER 17, 1988
`
`1395
`
`a
`UllHot•• , ........ ,
`lttMU Ntu+IN ON I
`
`A
`
`... -· ...
`
`i
`l
`
`Fag 1-Efrttt ofCAMPATil-IG (A) and CAMPATil-IH (8)- blood counts in poitleat I.
`4 - lymphocytes; D. • ncucrophils.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`T U.\\OUR treaanem by passive serotherapy has had a long
`and largely unsuccessful history .1 The advent of monoclonal
`antibodies gave fresh impetus to this approach, but results
`with unmodified antibodies are generally unremarkable.
`Efforts to enhance activity in vivo are now largely focused on
`the conjugation of antibodies to toxins or radionuclides.
`However, we are convinced that physiological effector
`mechanisms are still among the most potent and have tried
`to find the optimwn combinations of antibody specificity
`and isocype to exploit them fuJJy.
`One possible specificity is the CAMPATH-1 antigen.' It
`does not readily undergo modulation and is abundantly
`expressed on virtually all lymphoid cells and monocyces, but
`not on other cell cypes.u These properties make it a
`potential target for treaanent of lymphoid malignant
`disorders and for immunosuppression. Several rat lgM and
`lgG antibodies to this antigen have been produced.•.s The
`lgM CAMPATH-IM) is intensely lytic with hwnan
`complement and is widely used for depletion ofT cells from
`bone marrow to prevent graft-versus-host disease."' The
`lgG2b (CAMPATH-lG) is the most potent for cell
`depletion in vivo,• probably because it binds to hwnan Fe
`receptors and can activate the complement system.• Patients
`with
`lymphoid malignant disorders
`treated with
`CAMPATH- lG (25-50 mg/day for 10 days) showed
`pronounced reduction in lymphoid infiltration of blood and
`bone marrow and
`improvement of splenomegaly.•
`However, treaanent with rat antibody is likely to be limited
`by an antiglobulin response. This problem should be
`reduced or eliminated by use of a hwnan antibody. A
`reshaped hwnan antibody (CAMPATH-lH) has been
`constructed-the hypervariable regions of the rat antibody
`were transplanted into nonnaf hwnan immunoglobulin
`genes.• Hwnan IgG l was chosen since it had greater activity
`than other hwnan isocypes both in complement lysis and in
`cell-mediated killing .... "
`Here we describe the use of CAMP A TH-lH to treat two
`patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although it was
`possible to continue treaanent for up to 6 weeks without the
`development of a neutralising antiglobulin response, the
`main point of this report is to describe the efficacy of the
`antibody in clearing large masses of nunout cells. This is the
`first report of treaanent with a fulJy reshaped hwnan
`monoclonal antibody.
`
`PATIENTS ANO MEniODS
`Approval for the use of monoclonal antibodies was given by the
`ethical comminec of Addcnbrooke's Hospital and wrincn consent
`was obwncd from both paticnrs.
`Antibodies were obtained from culrure supernatant of cells
`growing in a hollow fibre biorcactor (' Acusyst-Jr', Endorronics).
`CAMPATii-IG was purified by precipitation with ammonium
`sulphate; CAMPATH-IH was
`purified
`by
`affinity
`chromatography on prolClll-A-• Scpharosc'. They were dissolved in
`phosphate-buffered saline, sterile filtered, and tested for pyrogcn
`and sterility. Patients were prchydrated overnight and antibody,
`diluted in 500 ml saline, was inflHcd over 2-4 h
`CAMPA TH-I expression on rumour cells was measured by flow
`and
`cytomctry
`complement-mediated
`Scrum
`lysis.u•
`ooncent12tions of CAMPATii-IH were measured by
`invnWlOOuorescmce with normal lympbocytcs.' Southern bk><
`analysis with an imnnmoglobulin J" probe was used to detect
`residual rumour cdls in DNA extracted from mononuclear
`fractions of bone marrow.• Antiglobulin responses were sought by
`two techniques. Tbc first was a solid-phase cnzymc-linked assay
`using microtittt plates coated with CAMPATH-IH. After
`incubation with patients' scrum samples, the assay was devdopcd
`with biotin-labelled CAMPATH-IH foUowcd by Stttptavidin(cid:173)
`pcroxidasc. A mixture of monoclonal mouse antibodies against
`human JgG was used as a positive control and 500 ng/ml of this
`mixture oould be detected. In the second assay, patienrs' scrum
`samples were mixed with rcdcdlsoouplcd with CAMPATH-IH.11
`Agglutination by 5 ng/ml of the control mixture could be detected.
`Inummoglobulin allotypcs were dctcrmincd by means of standard
`reagents and techniques from the Central Labomory of the
`Netherlands Red Cross blood U20Sfusion service.
`
`RESULTS
`
`PaLien1 I
`A 69-year-old woman presented in I 983 with acute
`appendicitis. Massive splenomegaly was found (table) and
`the bone marrow was heavily infiltrated with lymphocytes,
`some of which had clefted nuclei and a single nucleolus.
`There was weak membrane expression of IgM-kappa.
`Computed tomography scan showed splenomegaly but no
`lymphadenopathy. Grade I, stage IVA non-Hodgkin
`lymphoma in leukaemic phase was diagnosed. Between
`1983 and 1987 the patient received oral and intravenous
`chemotherapy with combinations of cyclophosphamide,
`vincristine, prednisolone, and chlorambucil, which induced
`partial responses, the minimwn level of marrow infiltration
`being 40%. Two courses of splenic radiotherapy were given,
`
`3 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1132
`
`

`

`1396
`
`THE LANCET, DECEMBER 17, 1988
`
`but the second (in April 1987) was cunailed since the spleen
`grew larger during the course.
`In September 1987 the disease progressed with increases
`in blood lymphocytes (24 x 109 cells/I) and spleen size. The
`patient was treated with CAMPATH-IG for 8 days (fig
`IA). This treatment completely cleared lymphoma cells
`from blood and marrow but only partially reduced spleen
`size. CAMP A TH-1 G induced fever, nausea, and vomiting,
`and the treatment was stopped on day 8 when it resulted in
`severe bronchospasm. (Such severe reactions have not been
`seen in twenty-one other patients who have received similar
`doses.) Reappearance of lymphoma cells in the blood was
`initially slow and the spleen size did not change for 5 months
`but there was little recovery of normal haemopoiesis. In
`March 1988 the patient began to lose weight and
`experienced drenching night sweats. The spleen enlarged
`and lymphoma cells reaccumulated in the blood. They
`had
`similar phenotype and
`identical
`rearranged
`immunoglobulin J" fragments
`to those seen before
`treatment. Marrow aspirate and trephine showed complete
`replacement of normal marrow by lymphoma cells (fig 2A);
`the patient became dependent on red-cell transfusions and
`was absolutely neutropenic.
`The patient's serum did not block binding of
`CAMPATH-IH or CAMPATH-IG
`to
`normal
`lymphocytes and the tumour cells were still sensitive to these
`antibodies in vitro, so we decided to treat her with
`CAMPATH-IH. The starting dose was 1 mg daily and,
`since it was well tolerated, the dose was increased to a
`maximum of 20 mg/day, though the usual dose was 4
`mg/day owing to the small amount available. In all the
`patient received 126 mg over 30 days. The response was
`prompt; in 6 days the night sweats had abated, by day 10
`there was pronounced reduction in splenomegaly and
`recovery of blood neutrophils, and by day 18 lymphoma
`cells were cleared from the blood (fig IB). On day 28 a bone
`marrow aspirate and trephine were hypocellular but showed
`active myelopoiesis and erythropoiesis and no lymphoid
`cells (fig 2B). No CAMPATH-1-positive cells could be
`detected by flow cytometry. DNA from the mononuclear
`marrow cells was germline when probed with an
`immunoglobulin t probe under conditions where clonal
`rearrangements could be detected in 0·2% of cells. Thus, we
`conclude that lymphoma cells were cleared from the
`marrow. The spleen volume was reduced about eight-fold
`(fig 3A, B), although it was still slightly larger than normal.
`Other than fever occurring about I h after the end of
`antibody infusions there were no adverse effects of antibody
`treatment until the 5th week, when severe rigors occurred
`after each infusion. No antiglobulin response could be
`detected and the rate of clearance of antibody from the
`serum was unchanged. For the next 3 weeks the patient
`continued to experience occasional fever and rigors. She was
`given oral cotrimoxazOfe because of her lymphopenia, but
`no infective cause of these symptoms could be found.
`In the next 4 months lymphocytes, which appeared
`morphologically normal, slowly reappeared in the blood (up
`to 0·2 x 109/1). They did not show the characteristic
`rearranged immunoglobulin fragments, and both CD3-
`positive and CDI9-positive cells were present (table).
`Serum immunoglobulin levels, which had been very low
`since presentation, have risen towards normal (table). A
`marrow aspirate and trephine taken 50 days after the end of
`treatment were again hypocellular but had no
`lymphomatous infiltration. This rnai:ow sample contained
`
`PATIENT OiARACfERISTICS BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT
`WITH CAMPATH-IH
`
`Patient 1
`
`Patient 2
`
`-
`Splern nu (m/Jt
`Lymphadmoparlryt
`
`~marrow
`% lymphoma cells
`Southern blot analysis
`lg JH fragment
`Pm/>heral blood
`Haemoglobin (g/dl)
`Rcticulocytcs ( x 109/1)
`Platelets ( x 109/1)
`Lymphocytes ( x 109/1)
`Neu<rophils ( x 109/1)
`Monocytcs ( x 109/1)
`Blood lymplwcyte
`phmctype I % J
`CD19
`CD3
`CAMPATH-lM
`CAMPATii-lH
`Serwn immunctlobulins
`lg/I)
`JgM
`lgA
`JgG
`Brna-Jtm£j
`
`Before
`
`After•
`
`lld0tt
`
`4460
`None
`
`590
`None
`
`2600
`
`paraortic
`
`99
`
`0
`
`R/R
`
`G/G
`
`8·7
`31
`37
`60
`0
`O·
`
`97
`0
`96
`98
`
`<0·3
`<0·5
`5·8
`None
`
`10·6
`135
`50
`0
`2-0
`0-04
`
`46
`32
`ND
`ND
`
`1·2
`<0·5
`8·2
`None
`
`72
`
`R/R
`
`11·2
`ND
`110
`37
`4·6
`1·5
`
`93
`8
`95
`97
`
`<0·3
`<0·5
`n
`++
`
`After•
`
`440
`None
`
`0
`
`G/G
`
`.12-0
`ND
`453
`0
`7-3
`0·5
`
`<5
`80
`ND
`ND
`
`0·7
`0·5
`4·7
`None
`
`*Made shonly after end of antibody treatment, except for lymphocyte
`phcnotyping and senun inununoglobulins, which wae assessed 6 weeks
`later.
`tBy computed tomognphy.
`ND- not done.
`
`4% CAMPATH-1-positive cells and showed some
`oligoclonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin genes.
`However, by day 100, lymphoma cells were again detected
`in the blood and the spleen size had started to increase. A
`second course of 12 days' therapy with CAMPATH-IH
`was completed with similar therapeutic benefit to the first
`and no adverse effects. Since the main reservoir of disease in
`this patient appeared to be the spleen, splenectomy was
`carried out at the end of this second course of treatment. At
`that time no rumour cells could be detected in blood or
`marrow. The patient is now well 37 days after the
`splenectomy. The lymphocyte count is low but she has
`normal neutrophil, platelet, and red-cell counts.
`
`Pazient 2
`A 67-year-old man presented in April 1988 with splenic
`pain; there was 12 cm splenomegaly, and computed
`tomography scan of thorax and abdomen revealed
`retrocrural and para-aortic lymphadenopathy, the largest
`node measuring 3 cm in diameter (fig 3C). A blood count
`revealed 36·6 x 109 lymphocytes/ml, the majority being
`lymphoplasmacytoid cells which expressed surface IgG(cid:173)
`kappa and were characterised by large cytoplasmic periodic(cid:173)
`acid-Schiff-positive vacuoles which could be intensely
`stained by anti-IgG. A marrow aspirate contained 72%
`lymphomatous cells
`(fig 2C). DNA
`from blood
`mononuclear cells showed biallelic rearrangement of
`immunoglobulin J" genes but was germline with various
`T -cell receptor and oncogene probes. The lymphoma cells
`expressed
`the CAMPATH-1 antigen
`in amounts
`comparable with normal lymphocytes but were more
`resistant to complement-mediated lysis. Stage IV A grade I
`
`4 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1132
`
`

`

`THE LJ\NCET, DECEMBER 17, 1988
`
`1397
`
`.. ~··
`,
`~'= ... ·~~··-...: .. ,
`• !
`. . ... ·.
`•...
`... ..
`·--
`.. ":.
`
`•·,~
`
`..
`"·
`
`. --
`
`-· ... ·~
`..A~
`... ·
`..:· .......... ·
`,
`• • ~ . . . . . . ... "t~ . . .
`
`Fig 2.-Cytology of hone ma.rrnw cells.
`
`A~ patient I trcphine before trcaancnt with CAMPATH-IH; B • patient I trcphine on day 43 (ie, 16 days after trcaanent); C~ patient 2 aspirate before
`treatment with CAMPATH·IH; D - patient 2 aspirate on day 78 (ie, 35 days after trcauncnt). Rcdu<:<d by 58% from x IOO (A,B), x 1000 (C), x 400 (D).
`
`A
`
`B
`
`c
`
`D
`
`Fag 3--Computed tomography scans showing affected splttDS and lymphnode.
`A•patient I before trcaoncnt with CAMPATH·IH; B •patient I on day 57; C - paticnt 2 before trcaancnt with CAMPATH-IH (tttr()CJ"llra] node
`arrowed); D •patient 2 on day 51.
`
`5 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1132
`
`

`

`1398
`
`THE LANCET, DECEMBER 17, 1988
`
`CAMH.TH · tH
`llllfltUUUUH I
`
`ISMt totel
`f
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`100
`
`t
`
`t
`
`10
`
`c
`e
`
`0 · 5
`
`•
`
`i
`l
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`•o
`
`so
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`to
`
`Days since start of antJbody therapy
`
`Fig -Effect of CAMPA TH-IH on blood counts in patient 2.
`
`• = lymphocytes; D. = neutrophils.
`
`non-Hodgkin
`
`lymphoma was
`
`lymphoplasmacytoid
`diagnosed.
`The patient was offered CAMPATH-lH as primary
`therapy and received a total of 85 mg over 43 days. This
`resulted in clearance of the lymphoma cells and normal
`lymphocytes from blood (fig 4) and marrow (fig 20),
`resolution of splenomegaly, and improvement in the
`lymphadenopathy. A computed tomography scan taken 8
`days after the end of antibody treaunent was normal (fig
`30). A bone marrow aspirate taken at the same time showed
`active haemopoiesis but no lymphoma cells, and no
`CAMPATH-1-positive cells could be detected by flow
`cytometry. DNA from the mononuclear fraction of this
`marrow showed only germline configuration when probed
`imrnunoglobulin J H probe. By day 78
`with
`the
`morphologically normal blood lymph0cytes began to
`reappear and none of the vacuolated cells could be seen. The
`patient remains well and off therapy.
`Some toxic effects of CAMPATH-lH were observed.
`The first dose was stopped after 3 mg had been given
`because of hypotension, possibly caused by tumour lysis.
`This problem was subsequently avoided by giving smaller
`doses at a slower rate and when lymphoma cells had been
`cleared from the blood, the dose was increased to a
`maximum of 8 mg over 4 h without any effect on blood
`pressure. Nevertheless, all doses induced fever (up to
`38·5°C), and malaise for up to 36 h, but these were not severe
`enough to stop antibody treaunent which, after the first
`week, was given on an outpatient basis. Treaunent was
`stopped after 43 days because of the development of an
`urticaria! rash after two successive antibody infusions.
`
`Half-life of CAMPATH-IH
`The concentration of CAMP A TH-1 H was measured in
`serum samples taken before and after antibody infusions and
`at other rimes throughout treaunent. In theory, a dose of 4-<i
`mg corresponds to about 1 µg/ml in the plasma. In fact we
`could not detect free antibody till day 4-<i, presumably
`because of rapid uptake by the tumour mass. After that, the
`rate of clearance was
`roughly constant, with
`the
`concentration being about 30-70% of the theoretical level
`
`Lack of Antiglcbulin Response
`TheallotypeofCAMPATH-lH is Glm(l,2,17),Krn(3).
`Patient 1 was Glm(l,3,17),Krn(3) and patient 2 was
`G lm(3),Krn(3), so both could theoretically have made an
`anti-allotype response as well as a response to the
`hypervariable regions. However, we failed to detect any
`antiglobulin to CAMPATH-lH either by the solid-phase
`the more
`sensmve
`enzyme-linked assay or by
`haemagglutination assay. In addition, the rate of clearance of
`CAMPA TH-IH did not change and free antibody could be
`detected for up to 8 days after the last dose had been given. It
`is possible that the reactions experienced at the end of the
`course of treaunent could have been provoked by
`contaminating non-human proteins
`in
`the antibody
`preparation.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The remissions achieved in these two patients show that it
`is possible to clear large numbers of rumour cells with small
`amounts of an unmodified monoclonal antibody. The
`effects in the first patient were far superior to the results of
`previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The selective
`lysis of lymphoma cells with recovery of normal
`haemopoiesis during the course of treaunent was an
`important advantage, which allowed treaunent to be given
`largely on an outpatient basis. We believe the· choice of
`antibody specificity and isotype is important; indeed, it may
`be why we had more success than previous effons with other
`monoclonal antibodies.1 ... 16 The CAMPATH-1 antigen
`seems to be a good target because it is widely distributed and
`abundant, and does not
`suffer
`from antigenic
`modulation.2.>"·11 This study shows that, as predicted,
`human IgGl can bring about cell lysis in vivo, though we
`cannot yet assess the relative importance of humoral or
`cellular mechanisms. There was no change in serum
`complement levels (CH50, C3, or C4 components) during
`antibody treatment (data not shown), but this does not
`exclude a role for C3 in cell clearance.
`Although the two patients did not make any serologically
`detectable antiglobulin response, it would be premature to
`draw general conclusions about the imrnunogenicity of
`human monoclonal antibodies, since CAMPATH-IH itself
`is probably imrnunosuppressive and the patients were
`already immunosuppresscd as a result of their disease.
`Nevertheless, it was encouraging that two courses of
`antibody treaunent could be given, even in the patient who
`· had previously had unusually severe reactions to the original
`rat antibody.
`The long-term benefit of treaunent with CAMPATH-
`1 H can only be assessed in a much larger trial when it would
`conventional
`probably be combined with more
`chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It may have wider
`an
`imrnunosuppressive agent
`for
`applications as
`transplantation and possibly autoimmi,me disease, since we
`already know that the rat antibody CAMPATH-IG is a
`potent imrnunosuppressant in the shon-term.
`
`We thank the patients and families, nursing sWT, medical collcaguc:s, and
`Prof F. G . J. Hayhoe for their coopcT3tion, encouragement and support; and
`Dr D. Gilmore, Dr H. S. Kruger-Gray, Prof R. R. A. Ox>rnbs, Mart.
`
`6 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1132
`
`

`

`THE LANCET, DECEMBER 17, 1988
`
`Frcwin, ond Caroline McHarg for their help. Thn won was Npported by !he
`Medical R~ Uiunal, Wellcome Bioccdl Lid, Ind St John's Collqe
`Cambrid~ (Meres studcntslup to M. J. S. D.). 'CAMPA Tif' 1$ a trade mart;
`ofWelkxxne Foundaoon.
`
`Correspondence should be addressed 10 H. W., Department of Pathology,
`Uruvcmty ofCamb~, Tennis Coun ROid, Cambrid~ CB2 IQP.
`
`REFERENO!S
`I. Cumc GA. Ech'l' yean o< immunoch<npy: 1 ttVICW olimmunoloplll m<lhods used
`(or treatment album.. canar. B' J c.-tr 1972; Mc 141-S).
`2. !Uk G, 11nabt S, Olumblcy G, ct oL R..._.t ol T odl from ban< monow (or
`cnrupbntation: a monodMal .-itilymphocytc antibody that fuccs human
`compl<mau. Blood 1983; 62: 87>-82.
`3. Hole G, Swinl<y O, Waldmann H, 0 - LC Rcoctivity ol r11 mon

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket