throbber
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 76, No. 8, pp. 4071-4074, August 1979
`Immunology
`
`Crystal structure of galactan-binding mouse immunoglobulin J539
`
`
`
`
`
`Fab at 4.5-A resolution
`
`
`(x-ray diffraction/pattern recognition/antibody structure)
`
`MANUEL A. NAVIA*, DAVID M. SEGAL*t, EDUARDO A. PADLAN*l, DAVID R. DAVIES*, NARAYANA RAO§,
`STUART RUDIKOFF§, AND MICHAEL POTTER§
`of Arthritis,
`
`
`
`•Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute Metabolism and Digestive Diseases;
`20205
`
`
`National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
`Contributed by David R. Davies, May 11, 1979
`
`and fLaboratory of Cell Biology,
`
`
`National Cancer Institute,
`
`u _=_o"" ... ooo=-----::i, o.soo�---=U:....•_O::o:·:=-500=-=---�
`ABSTRACT An electron-density
`map of the mouse galac­
`0.500r-mnr-"""
`. ;
`J539 (lgA2,K)
`'·,··c
`
`tan-binding immunoglobulin
`Fab has been cal­
`of 4.5 A by the method of heavy atom
`•.1 ,f
`
`culated to a resolution
`C·
`
`
`isomorphous replacement with four derivatives. The map has
`
`with the aid of a computer program which
`been interpreted
`
`
`systematically searched for the best fit between the electron·
`
`
`density map and the known coordinates of individual immu­
`
`
`
`
`noglobulin domains. The quaternary structure of J539 Fab at
`0
`
`
`this resolution appears similar to that of another mouse immu­
`
`
`noglobulin, l.ltA2,K Fab, McPC603. 'J.'he model coordinates for
`us to proceed directly to a high-resolution
`J539 Fab shoUld allow
`
`
`
`structure determination without further heavy atom isomor­
`phous replacement.
`The crystal structures of three immunoglobulin Fabs have been
`reported {l-3). One of these, the mouse myeloma protein
`McPC603, belongs to a class of immunoglobulins that bind
`specifically to phosphocholine. In this paper, we present the
`results of.a structural analysis at 4.5-A resolution of a second
`mouse Fab, the galactan-binding immunoglobulin ]539. A
`molecular model has been constructed with the aid of a com­
`puter search procedure used previously in the interpretation
`of the electron-density map of an intact immunoglobulin {4).
`The model allows us to describe the quaternary structural in­
`teractions between the constituent domains and domain pairs
`of the ]539 Fab and reveals a general similarity to
`McPC603.
`
`..:.>
`
`w
`
`A
`-y;;;.
`\..!
`
`----�---__,,.., o.ooo.__ _______ ...,...,.....
`v
`0.500
`0.000
`v
`0.500
`FIG. 1. Sections through the difference Patterson map for the
`K2Pt(CNS)6 derivative, showing the Harker peaks ·(A, B, and C).
`Contours are at %oths of origin peak; zero and negative contours are
`omitted.
`
`Useful heavy atom derivatives were obtained by soaking ]539
`
`Fab crystals in stabilizing solutions with 0.25 mM KzPt(CNS)s
`for 2 weeks, l mM K2PtCl4 for I week, 0.3 mM K2Hgl4 for 2
`weeks, and 50 mM Kl/I mM chloramine-T (Eastman Kodak)
`for l week. The iodine-derivatized crystals were washed with
`fresh stabilizing solution after the soaking �riod. Unique sets
`of three-dimensional reflection data to 4.5-A spacings were
`collected from native and derivative crystals with a Picker
`FA CS-1 diffractometer operated in thew-scan mode and using
`Cu Ka radiation. The various data sets were placed on the same
`relative scale, and pseudo temperature factors were applied to
`correct for differences in intensity fall-off. The K2Pt{CNS)6
`derivative was analyzed first, and difference Patterson maps,
`readily interpretable, revealed one site of substitution (Fig. 1).
`After preliminary refinement with projection data only, the
`coordinates and occupancy of the K2Pt(CNS)s site were used
`to determine the signs of the centric native protein reflections.
`These signs were used to examine the K2PtCl4 and K2Hgl4
`derivatives by difference Fourier analysis. The variables for
`these three heavy atom derivatives were then subjected to al­
`ternating cycles of least squares refinement and phase deter­
`mination with the three-dimensional data. The resulting phases
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`The immunoglobulin ]539 [a mouse lgA2,K; anti-(1-6)­
`,B-o-galactan] was isolated and purified as described (5), and
`pepsin fragments were obtained by using a published procedure
`(6).
`Crystals of J539 Fab were grown at room temperature from
`35% saturated solutions of ammonium sulfate containing 0.07
`M imidazole and 0.03 M zinc sulfate at pH 6.8. The crystals
`exhibit the symmetry of space group P212121 with unit cell
`dimensions: a = 54.l A, b = 74.2, A, and c = 130.8 A. They
`diffract to a resolution of at least 2.5 A. Prior to further work,
`the crystals were transferred into stabilizing solution (45%
`saturated ammonium sulfate/0.07 M imidazole/0.03 M zinc
`sulfate, pH 6.8). On rare occasions, a second crystal form was
`observed in the space group P212121 with unit cell dimensions:
`a = 55.7 A, b = 74.l A, and c = 125.7 A. Cocrystallization in
`the presence of the haptens (l-6)-,8-D-galactodiose (Gal2) and
`(l-6)-,8-o-galactotetraose (Gal4), both kindly provided by
`C.P.J. Glaudemans, yielded a needle-like crystal form which
`remains uncharacterized.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked .. ad.
`vertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate
`this fact.
`
`t Present address: Immunology Branch. Nat ional Cancer Institute.
`* Present address: Biophysics Department, Johns Hopkins University,
`Baltimore, MD.
`
`4071
`
`1 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1084
`
`

`

`4072
`
`Immunology: Navia et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979)
`
`Table 1. Heavy atom variables after refinement
`Isotropic
`temperature
`factor,
`A2
`
`Rel.
`Site occupancy•
`
`Derivative
`
`K2Pt(CNS)a
`K2PtCL.
`
`K2Hgl,
`Iodine
`
`Rct
`
`0.507
`0.590
`
`0.606
`0.587
`
`R1rl
`
`0.068
`0.068
`
`0.070
`0.116
`
`E§
`0.95
`0.89
`
`0.92
`1.62
`
`Fractional coordinates
`x
`y
`z
`1
`1.00
`22.1
`0.2320
`0.0437
`0.0624
`1
`0.2304
`0.0477
`0.0627
`0.51
`18.8
`2
`25.1
`0.6l43
`0.0333
`0.51
`0.3444
`1
`0.6346
`0.62
`0.0550
`0.3477
`25.6
`1
`0.5425
`0.62
`0.4514
`25.6
`0.5867
`0.96
`0.6349
`2
`0.8920
`13.0
`0.4008
`0.32
`3
`0.2927
`0.3469
`22.2
`0.1535
`• The site occupancies are on an arbitrary scale with the KzPt(CNS)6 site assigned an occupancy of 1.00.
`t Re= };I IFPH - Fpl - FHlf};IFPH - Fpl, in which the sums are over centric reflections only.
`I R1r = };llFP.HI - IFp + FHI l/};IFPHI·
`§ E is the root mean square lack of closure error. The average protein structure amplitude is 10.3.
`were subsequently used to analyze the iodine derivative. The
`coordinates on the electron density. This program was originally
`refined variables of. the four heavy atom derivatives are listed
`used·in the interpretation of the electron-density map of the
`intact immunoglobulin "Dob" ( 4) and will be described in detail
`in Table l. The mean figure-of-merit for the 1895 phased re­
`flections is 0.82. "Best" (7) Fourier maps were computed by
`elsewhere. The translations of the domains were conducted
`using these phases.
`along the three orthogonal axes with increments of 2 A. at 6.0-A.
`Two methods w�re used to interpret this map.
`resolution and of 1.5 A. at 4.5-A. resolution. The rotations were
`(i) Visual examination of the map, making use of the known
`computed by varying the three Eulerian angles with increments
`structure of McPC603. In addition, because K2Pt(CNS)6 bound
`of 30° at 6.0-A. resolution and of 15° at 4.5-A. resolution (these
`also to McPC603 where it was attached to the constant region
`increments were decreased as the final fit solution was ap­
`of the molecule (8) and because the constant regions of
`proached). To further limit the scope of the search, the coor­
`McPC603 and J539 Fab are most probably identical, it was
`dinates of McPC603 heavy chain residue 148, which in McPC
`assumed that Pt( CNS)�- bound to the same site in both mole­
`603 was near the KzPt(CNS)s binding site, was tethered to
`cules, thus providing a known location in J539 from which to
`within.20 A. of the coordinates of .the platinum binding site in
`start the interpretation.
`the J539 electron-density map, again on the assumption that
`(ii) The overall three-dimensional structures of the domains
`both molecules have the same Pt binding site.
`of McPC603 were assumed to be similar to those of J539. A
`For the initial search at 6-A. resolution, the constant region
`computer program was accordingly used to rotate and translate
`domain pair (CHI-CL) of McPC603 Fab was used as a unit.
`exhaustively the known coordinates of the domains of McPC603
`Afterwards, the variable region domain pair (V H-V L) was used
`Fab (9) into the electron-density map of J539; after each such
`as a unit, with the hypervariable r�idues (10) for the light chain,
`transformation, they were compared with the density. The
`26-34, 50-55, and 92-96, and for the heavy ci1ain, 31-35,
`criterion of fit was the number of overlaps of transformed
`51-59, and 97-100, omitted because they could be expected
`to differ between McPC603 and J539. At this stage of the search,
`only a-carbon coordinates were used in order to minimize
`computer time and the amount· of memory used. All searches
`were conducted on a PDP 11/70 computer which has an ad-
`.
`dressing limit of 32,000 words.
`The 6-A. resolution results were refined by searches of the
`4.5-A resolution J539 map. This time, however; the individual
`McPC603 domains (CHl, CL, VH, VL) were fitted separately.
`An idealized (11) polyalanine structure, generated from the
`McPC603 backbone coordinates and again excluding hyper­
`variable residues, was used in the search. Typical results for the
`two searches are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2. An indication
`of the precision of the fit obtained by this procedure can be
`
`280
`
`260
`
`240
`
`220
`
`8. 200
`..
`-;: .,
`0 180
`
`100'--�'--�-'-�-'-�-'-----'-�-'-�-'-�-'"�--'
`0
`160 200 240 280 320 360
`80
`120
`40
`Increments, degree�
`FIG. 2. Overlap of domain pair CHl-CL on the J539 4.5-A elec­
`tron-density map as a function of the single Eulerian angle 81. The
`varied in 1° intervals over its full range with
`angle was systematically
`all other rotation and translation variables fixed at their maximal
`overlap values.
`
`Table 2. Comparison of search results using the CHl-CL domain
`pair at two resolutions
`
`Peak height
`above mean,
`SD
`
`Resolution, No. of atoms Over la�,• no.
`used in search Maximum Mean
`A
`3.9
`208
`46
`93
`6
`4.8
`305
`1020
`503
`4.5
`The Euler angle 81 was systematically varied about the final
`CHl-CL domain-pair solution; all other rotation/translation variables
`were kept fixed.
`• "Overlaps" refer to the number of coordinates found to superimpose
`on electron density above a specified level (see text).
`
`2 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1084
`
`

`

`Immunology: Navia et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Set. USA 76 (1979)
`
`4073
`
`FIG. 3. Sections through the 4.5-A electron-density map of J539 perpendicular to the Y (74.2 A) axis, with model polyalanine coordinates
`superimposed. The sections shown are from y"' 0.06 toy= 0.16. Solid and open circles, heavy and light chains, respectively; a.rrows, ends of
`the independently fitted V H and CH 1 domains that have to be joined at the switch region.
`obtained from the Euler angle solutions presented in Table 3.
`The search procedure described above was carried out in­
`Another estimate of the precision of fit might be obtained from
`dependently of the visual interpretation and ultimately led to
`a best fit solution (Fig.s. 3 and 4). We have calculated structure
`the width of the curve in Fig. 2. A quantitative estimate is dif­
`factors and crystallographic R factors for the molecular models
`ficult, however, because the error cannot be demonstrated to
`resulting from both the high- and low-resolution searches (Table
`have a normal distribution but seems to depend rather on the
`4). These numbers compare favorably with the R factors of
`form and pseudosymmetry of the fitted molecule. The solution
`peak for the 6-A search was broader than that for the 4.5-A
`other structures at similar stages of their solution (12-15).
`In the search procedure at 4.5-A resolution, the individual
`search, thus justifying the use of a coarser and more economical
`domains were fitted separately and their final positions in the
`sampling scheme at the lower resolution.
`model correspond to the highest peak of overlap. Nothing in
`this search procedure constrains the separate domains to a
`well-behaved and consistent solution. It is therefore reassuring
`that the domains do not interpenetrate. Also, the packing of the
`molecules in the unit cell, taking into account the symmetry
`elements of the space group P212121, provides an arrangement
`in which neighboring molecules do not share density but nev­
`ertheless appear to make sufficient intermolecular contacts to
`sustain a crystal lattice.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Examination of more than 50 heavy atom compounds yielded
`only the four usable derivatives of Table I. For reasons that
`were not apparent, these derivatives were of significantly poorer
`quality than those used for the comparable McPC600 analysis
`(8), and their use led to an electron-density map in which the
`contrast between protein and solvent regions was low, so that
`the molecular boundary was not immediately apparent. An
`attempt to interpret this map visually based on the positions of
`the heavy atom derivatives, particularly K2Pt(CNS)s, and the
`known structure of McPC600 Fab resulted in a tentative de­
`lineation of the molecular boundary. However, interpretation
`of the electron-density map in specific molecular terms ne­
`cessitated a more quantitative approach.
`
`Resolution,
`A
`
`Table 3. "Best-fit" Euler angles at two resolutions and for the
`constant domains taken separately and in pairs
`CHl-CL
`CHI
`
`CL
`01 02 03 01 02 03 01 02 03
`105 336 99
`6
`100 334
`111 106 328 110
`99 332 113
`4.5
`The electron-density maps used i.n the search procedure were
`sampled at one-third the resolution indicated.
`
`FIG. 4. Stereo view of the Ca skeleton of the J539 Fab structure.
`Open circles, McPC603 hypervariable residues that were excluded
`from the search.
`
`3 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1084
`
`

`

`4074
`
`
`
`Immunology: Navia et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979)
`
`Table4. Crystallographic R factors for the J539 models
`Temperature
`factor,
`A2
`50
`25
`
`Resolution,
`A
`
`6
`4.5
`
`Coordinates Reflections
`a-Carbon
`934
`Polyalanine
`2167
`
`R factor,
`%
`
`44.7
`46.5
`
`the binding cavity in the variable
`region of J539 may in fact be
`
`blocked, at least in part, by the constant region of a neighboring,
`
`symmetry-related molecule.
`
`Finally, the limited number of degrees of freedom in the
`searches,
`
`coupled with the global constraints imposed by the
`
`
`electron-density map, confer a higher precision on our model
`than would be expected had the model been constructed from
`
`the map de nooo. This added precision should allow us to pro­
`
`
`
`ceed directly to a high-resolution structure determination and
`The final configuration of the model is such that natural
`
`
`to the refinement of J539 Fab without need of additional
`
`
`connections can be made easily between the variable and
`
`high-resolution heavy atom derivatives.
`
`
`constant halves of the heavy and light chains, respectively. The
`polypeptide chains at this "switch region" (16) of the molecule
`The authors are grateful to Dr. Daniel Mercola for help in the search
`
`can readily be linked to provide a reasonable connection (Fig.
`for heavy atom derivatives. We thank Drs. G. H. Cohen and E. W.
`
`3), then� being no constraints that would �tate an addition
`Silverton for valuable discussion and advice and Dr. C. P. J. Glaude­
`mans for the haptens used in this study.
`
`or deletion of residues.
`The elbow bend, the angle between the pseudo 2-fold sym­
`l. Segal, D. M., Padlan, E. A., Cohen, G. H., Rudikoff, S., Potter,
`
`metry 'xes that skewer the constant and variable domain pairs
`
`M. & Davies, D. R. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71,
`
`(16, 17), provides a measure of the quaternary structure of Fahs.
`4298-4302.
`All knqwn Fab elbow bend angles are given in Table 5. The
`2. Poljak, R. J., Amzel, L. M., Avey, H.P., Chen, B. L., Phizackerly,
`J539 Ffib elbow bend is 136°, which is indistinguishable
`from
`R. P. & Saul, F. (1973) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3300-
`that of McPC603. This appears to be an extremum in the range
`3310.
`3. Matsushima, M., Marquart, M., Jones, T. A., Colman, P. M.,
`of allowed values for Fab elbow bends, probably as a result of
`Bartels, K., Huber, R. & Palm, W. (1978) J. Mol. Bwl. 12 1,
`
`
`contacts between residues of the constant and variable domain
`pairs.
`441-459.
`4. Silverton, E. W., Navia, M. A. & Davies, D. R. (1977) Proc. Natl.
`The J539 and McPC603 Fahs are similar in their quaternary
`
`Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5140-5144.
`
`
`structures, as suggested by the similarities in their elbow bends.
`5. Jolley, M. E., Rudikoff, S., Potter, M. & Glaudemans, C. P. J.
`
`
`
`The principal difference lies in a small torsion about the local
`12, 3039-3044.
`(1973) BtocMmlstry
`
`
`
`region. to the constant dyad of the variable region with respect
`6. Rudikoff, S., Potter, M., Segal, D. M., Padlan, E. A. & Davies, D.
`
`
`Note that the resolution of the electron-density map is too low
`R. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 3689-3692.
`7. Blow, D. M. & Crick, F. H. C. (1959) Acta Crystallogr.
`
`to provide any information about the conformations of the
`
`12,
`
`
`
`
`various hypervariable regions of J539; these should be revealed
`794-802.
`8. Padlan, E. A., Segal, D. M., Spande, T. F., Davies, D. R., Rudikoff,
`
`
`with the future high-resolution refinement of the structure.
`S. & Potter, M. (1973) Nature (London) New Bwl. 145, 165-
`
`
`
`
`The model can provide a plausible explanation for the ob­
`167.
`servation that soaking of the haptens Gal2 and Gal4 into J539
`9. Feldmann, R. J., ed. (1976) AMSOM-Atlas of Macromolecular
`
`
`
`
`crystals did not yield significant intensity changes indicative
`(Tracor Jitco, Inc., Rockville, MD).
`Structure on MfcroficM
`
`
`
`of binding. Examination of the molecular packing shows that
`10. Kabat, E. A., Wu, T. T. & Bilofsky, H. (1976) in Variable Regions
`Chains (Medical Computer Systems, Bolt,
`of Immunoglobulin
`Beranek & Newman, Cambridge, MA).
`• 11. Diamond, R. (1966) Acta Crystallogr.
`21, 253-266.
`12. Schmid, M. F., Herriott, J. R. & Lattman, E. A. (1974) ]. Mol.
`Biel. 84, 97-101.
`13. Wishner, B. C., Ward, K. B., Lattman, E. A. & Love, W. E. (1975)
`]. Mol. Biel. 98, 179-194.
`14. Ward, K. B., Hendrickson, W. A. & Klippenstein, G. L. (1975)
`257, 818-821.
`Nature (London)
`15. Sarma, R. & Bott, R. (1977) f. Mol. Biel. 113, 555-565.
`16. Davies, D. R., Padlan, E. A. & Segal, D. M. (1975) in Contem­
`Immunology, eds. Inman, F. P. &
`porary Topics in Molecular
`Mandy, W. J. (Plenum, New York). Vol. 4, pp. 127-155.
`17. Colman, P. M., Deisenhofer, J., Huber, R. & Palm, W. (1976) J.
`Mol. Biol. 100, 257-282.
`
`Table 5. Published Fab elbow bend angles
`
`Protein (ref.)
`
`Angle,
`degrees
`Newm (2)
`131*
`McPC603 (1)
`134
`J539 (this work)
`136
`Dob lgG (4)
`147
`Kol Fab (3)
`166
`Kol IgG (17)
`174
`•This elbow bend angle was computed from coordinates in AMSOM
`(9).
`
`4 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1084
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket