`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`JAMES B. GOODMAN,
`Patent Owner.
`
`__________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-02021
`U.S. Patent No. 6,243,315
`__________________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY G. BEASLEY IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`Samsung v. Goodman - IPR2017-02021
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02021
`
`
`I, Anthony G. Beasley, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a Counsel with the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP. I
`
`represent and advise Petitioner Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) in
`
`connection with the above-captioned inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding and I
`
`am counsel in the underlying district court litigation (Goodman v. Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-05539-JGK (S.D.N.Y.)) on the patent
`
`at issue in this IPR, U.S. Patent No. 6,243,315 (“’315 Patent”).
`
`2.
`
` I have been a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`California since 2015. My California State Bar number is 307511. I have been a
`
`member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Texas since 2015. My Texas
`
`State Bar number is 24093882. I have been a member in good standing of the Bar
`
`of the State of Wisconsin since 2009. My Wisconsin State Bar number is
`
`1073135. I have been a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`Minnesota since 2008. My Minnesota State Bar number is 389070. I am also
`
`admitted to practice before numerous federal courts:
`
`a.
`b.
`c.
`d.
`e.
`f.
`
`U.S.D.C. for the Central District of California (since 2017)
`U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of California (since 2016)
`U.S.D.C. for the Southern District of Texas (since 2017)
`U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas (since 2014)
`U.S.D.C. for the District of Minnesota (since 2008)
`U.S.D.C. for the Western District of Wisconsin (since 2010)
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02021
`
`
`g.
`U.S.C.A. for the Federal Circuit (since 2015)
`I have over nine years of experience practicing patent and technology
`
`3.
`
`related litigation. I have litigated numerous patent cases across the country,
`
`including California, Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Alabama, Tennessee,
`
`Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New York. A copy of my biography is
`
`provided as Appendix A.
`
`4.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I
`
`have been actively involved in the present IPR proceeding regarding the ’315
`
`Patent. I represent Petitioner in concurrent litigation involving the ’315 Patent, and
`
`I have extensively reviewed the patent, its file history, previous IPRs involving the
`
`same patent, filings from other district court litigations involving the same patent,
`
`and the prior art being asserted in the petition for IPR in this proceeding.
`
`5. Moreover, I have advised Petitioner on strategy regarding Petitioner’s
`
`affirmative arguments in this IPR proceeding, supervised the drafting of the
`
`petition, reviewed the accompanying Declaration of Dr. Andrew Wolfe, and
`
`worked with Petitioner to find and identify the references relied upon in the
`
`petition and to draft other submissions to the Office.
`
`6.
`
`I have represented clients in connection with many patent litigations
`
`regarding technology similar to that at issue in this IPR, which relates generally to
`
`memory devices with low-power and/or self-refresh modes.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02021
`
`
`7.
`
`I have worked closely with Dr. Wolfe, who provided a declaration in
`
`this IPR, regarding his declaration. I was also involved in identifying and retaining
`
`Dr. Wolfe as an expert in this IPR, and I signed his engagement letter.
`
`8.
`
`I frequently publish on issues concerning patent law and technology
`
`related litigation.
`
`9.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body. I have never had an application for admission to practice
`
`before any court or administrative body denied. No sanction or contempt citation
`
`has been imposed against me by any court or administrative body.
`
`10.
`
`I have read any will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I agree to and will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`12.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office in any
`
`other proceeding in the last three years.
`
`13.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true,
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and
`
`that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Anthony G. Beasley
`Anthony G. Beasley
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`APPENDIX A
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 6 of8
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Tony Beasley
`Counsel
`
`Los Angeles
`D: +1-213-430-6529
`tbeasley@omm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tony Beasley focuses his practice on intellectual property
`litigation and has experience in many areas of technology,
`including e-commerce technology applications, semiconductors,
`graphic processing, memory, consumer electronics, medical
`devices, avionics, financial trading systems, and oil and gas
`drilling systems.
`
`Experience
`• Currently representing an international semiconductor and
`consumer electronics company as a defendant in patent
`litigation involving memory controller technology (S.D. Texas
`and S.D. New York)
`• Currently representing an international semiconductor and
`consumer electronics company as a defendant in patent
`litigation involving authentication for online transactions (S.D.
`Alabama)
`• Represented a radio and mass media company as a
`defendant in patent litigation involving online media playback
`and negotiated a favorable settlement (E.D. Texas)
`• Represented a real estate marketing startup and app
`developer as defendant in litigation involving claims of
`copyright infringement and breach of contract (N.D.
`California)
`
`Admissions
`
`Bar Admissions
`California
`Minnesota
`Texas
`Wisconsin
`
`Court Admissions
`US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
`US District Court, District of
`Minnesota, Eastern District of Texas,
`and Western District of Wisconsin
`
`Education
`
`University of Wisconsin Law School,
`J.D.: managing editor, Wisconsin Law
`Review
`DePaul University, B.S., Computer
`Science
`
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`
`
`• Represented an international semiconductor and consumer electronics company as a defendant in a
`patent infringement case involving ambient light and proximity detection devices and secured a
`favorable settlement on the eve of trial and after winning a motion to strike willful infringement
`contentions (E.D. Texas)
`• Represented an international consumer electronics company in a patent infringement case involving
`television signal processing and chipsets and secured a favorable settlement on the eve of trial (E.D.
`Texas)
`• Represented an international microprocessor company in complex, multi-patent litigation involving
`transistor design, computer memory, and microprocessor architecture and secured a favorable,
`publicly reported settlement worth several hundred million dollars before trial (N.D. California)
`• Represented an international medical device company in multi-district patent infringement litigation
`involving transcatheter heart valve replacement and annuloplasty repair (D. Delaware, D. Minnesota,
`and C.D. California)
`• Represented an international medical device company in district court patent infringement litigation
`involving total disc replacement and successfully argued for a new trial on damages before securing a
`favorable settlement (M.D. Tennessee)
`• Represented an international avionics company in an ITC patent infringement case involving digital
`mapping and task management technology (ITC)
`• Represented an international graphics processor company in district court litigation involving three-
`dimensional graphics and secured a favorable settlement prior to trial (W.D. Wisconsin)
`• Represented a developer of financial trading software in patent litigation involving foundational
`technology related to automated derivatives trading, securing several favorable settlements prior to
`trial (N.D. Illinois)
`• Represented a holder of an internationally recognized portfolio of oil and gas drilling intellectual
`property against several defendants in multiple districts, securing several favorable settlements prior
`to trial (W.D. Pennsylvania and E.D. Texas)
`• Represented a developer of medical charting software as defendant in patent litigation against
`multiple patent holders (E.D. Texas)
`
`Professional Activities
`Board Member
`• Minnesota Hispanic Bar Association (2012-2013)
`Speaker
`•
`“All In: Winning Strategies from the World of Patent Negotiation & Litigation,” Missouri Bar, St. Louis,
`Missouri (November 8, 2012)
`
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 1013 - Page 8 of 8
`
`