throbber
PHOTOLYSIS AND RADIOLYSIS OF 2-METHYLBUTANE
`
`5139
`
`and it is, therefore, unlikely that after detachment of
`the first H atom, a second H atom would be eliminated.
`Little can be said concerning the modes of formation of
`the pentenes, except that they are related to those of
`hydrogen.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`The authors would like to express their gratitude to
`the referee of this paper for his comprehensive com(cid:173)
`ments on the discussion.
`
`THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
`
`VOLUME 47, NUMBER 12
`
`15 DECEMBER 1967
`
`Investigation of Some Cea+-Activated Phosphors
`
`G. BLASSE AND A. BRIL
`Philips Research Laboratories, N. V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken, Eindhoven, Netherlands
`(Received 14 August 1967)
`
`The fluorescence of a number of new Ce8+-activated phosphors is described and discussed. Only host
`lattices with a sublattice consisting of trivalent lanthanide ions are used to avoid charge compensation of the
`Ce3+ ion. Usually the Ce3+ emission is in the near-ultraviolet region. Y8Al.012-Ce and SrY20 c Ce, however,
`show emission in the visible region with a maximum in the green. Conditions for visible Ce3+ emission are
`indicated, viz., large crystal-field splittings (YaAI6Ot2-Ce) or a large Stokes shift (SrY20cCe). In a number
`of cases we were able to observe all crystal-field components of the excited 5d level of Ce3+. The cubic
`crystal-field splitting of the 5d level varies strongly with host lattice from 7000 to 14000 cm-I . The position
`of the center of the 5d levels in oxides is about 30% lower than in the free ion. For some phosphors we
`observed more than one emission band at room temperature. This is due to fluorescence from higher excited
`levels. Efficient energy transfer from Ce3+ to Cr3+ was observed in Y3Al.012.
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`II. EXPERIMENTAL
`
`The fluorescence of Ce3+-activated compounds is well
`known.1,2 Usually the emission consists of a broad band
`with two peaks in the long-wavelength ultraviolet
`region. Since the Ce3+ ion has a 4j1 configuration, the
`ground state consists of a doublet (2F5/2 and 2F7/2).
`The lower excited states are the crystal-field components
`of the sa configuration. The transition 4f--+6s and
`charge-transfer transitions are at considerably higher
`energies3 and are not considered in this paper. The Ce3+
`emission is due to a Sd--+4f transition. This is an allowed
`electric dipole transition and therefore the decay time
`of the fluorescence is very short ( < 10-7 sec) .1,4
`Recently we have also reported on a Ce3+-phosphor
`which emits in the visible, viz., YsAl5012-Ce.4 This
`peculiar behavior prompted us to study the Ce3+
`fluorescence in other oxides of the trivalent lanthanides
`(La3+, Gd3+, Y3+, Sc3+). Surprisingly enough, these
`materials have not widely been investigated, although
`these host lattices offer the possibility of introducing
`Ce3+ without charge compensation.
`The present paper gives the results of this investiga(cid:173)
`tion. The complete crystal-field splitting of the sa
`configuration of the Ce3+ ion was found in a number of
`cases. Requirements for Ce3+ emission in the visible
`region are indicated.
`I A. Bril and H. A. Klasens, Philips Res. Rept. 7, 421 (1952).
`2 J. W. Gilliland and M. S. Hall, Electrochem. Tech. 4, 378
`(1966) .
`3 E. Loh, Phys. Rev. 154, 270 (1967).
`• G. Blasse and A. Bril, Appl. Phys. Letters 11, 53 (1967).
`
`Samples were prepared by firing intimate mixtures of
`high-purity oxides (or compounds, which on decompo(cid:173)
`sition yield oxides) at appropriate temperatures in
`nitrogen. The Ce3+ ions were introduced by replacing
`part of the trivalent lanthanide ions by Ce3+ ions. The
`Ce3+ concentration was 1-2 at. %. Products were
`checked by x-ray analysis. The performance of the
`optical measurements has been described previously.4-6
`
`III. REFLECTION AND EXCITATION SPECTRA
`
`A. Results
`Tables I-III contain the absorption bands of the
`Ce3+ ion in a number of host lattices in the uv region.
`These host lattices do not absorb in the optical region
`studied except for the Ga-containing oxides. The data
`were obtained from excitation and diffuse reflection
`spectra. In some cases only a continuous absorption
`was found, so that the absorption bands remain un(cid:173)
`known (Table II). Figures 1-3 show the excitation and
`diffuse reflection spectra of Y AlaB4012 : Ce, YaAhOI2: Ce,
`and ScBOa: Ceo These figures illustrate two types of
`excitation spectra, viz., those in which the quantum
`efficiency of the Ce3+ fluorescence is roughly independ(cid:173)
`ent of the exciting wavelength (YAlaB40 12:Ce, Fig. 1)
`and those in which the quantum efficiency decreases
`
`6 A. Bril and W. L. Wanmaker, J. Electrochem. Soc. Ill, 1363
`(1964) .
`6 G. Blasse and A. Bril, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 2579 (1967).
`
`TCL 1026, Page 1
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

`

`5140
`
`G. BLASSE AND A. BRIL
`
`TABLE I. Efficiencies for ultraviolet and cathode ray excitation, positions of emission and excitation bands
`and Stokes shift of the emission of some Ce3+ phosphors.
`
`Composition"
`
`'1(%)b
`
`qma.(%)°
`
`Emission bands
`(10' cm-I)d
`
`Excitation bands
`(lOS cm-I)-
`
`Sc2Si2O,Ce
`ScBOrCe
`YBOrCe
`LaBOrCe
`YPO,-Ce
`LaPOcCe
`Y AlaB40 12-Ce
`Y.Al.01:rCe
`YOCI-Ce
`LaOCI-Ce
`LaOBr-Ce
`
`1.5
`2
`2
`0.2
`2.5
`2.2
`2
`3.5
`3.5
`0.4
`0.2
`
`65
`70
`50
`35
`30
`40
`40
`",70
`60
`30
`25
`
`25.4; 29.4
`26.8; ",30.5
`23.8; 25.4
`26.6; 28.4; 31.5
`28.3; 30.0
`29.8; 31.5
`27.2; 29.1
`18.2; 27.8; "'29.2
`26.3
`27.8
`22.8
`
`29.0; 33.3; ",43.5
`28.0;31.2;36.1;38.5
`27.4; (",29); 40.8; (",43.5)
`30.8; 36.9; 41.5
`32.8; (34.2); 39.6
`36.2; 38.8; 41.6
`31.0; 36.6; 39.2
`22.0;29.4; ",37; ",44
`31.6;35.8
`(",35); 35.8; 39.7
`28.4; 34.7
`
`Stokes
`shift
`(lOS cm-I) I
`
`3.6
`1.2
`2.0
`2.4
`2.8
`4.7
`1.9
`3.8
`5.3
`5.2
`5.6
`
`• Cea+ concentration is 1-2 at.%.
`b Radiant efficiency for cathode ray excitation (20 kV).
`° Quantum efficiency for excitation in the lowest excited level.
`d Position of the emission peaks.
`
`e Position of the excitation bands; shoulders between brackets .
`I Stokes shift of the emission. i.e .. difference between the positions of the
`lowest excited level and the short-wavelength component of the emission
`from this level.
`
`exciting wavelength
`drastically with decreasing
`(Y3AhOl2-Ce, Fig. 2 and ScB03-Ce, Fig. 3). All the
`excitation spectra we obtained belong to either the
`former or the latter type. In this section we discuss
`the number and position of the absorption bands and a
`possible explanation for the two types of excitation
`spectra. A comparison between the excitation spectra
`of CeH- and TbH-activated phosphors is also included.
`
`B. Discussion
`The occurrence of more than one CeH absorption
`band in the region between 25 000 and 50 000 cm-l is
`due to the crystal-field splitting of the 5d (2D) state.
`As argued before in the case of TbH we can neglect the
`effect of spin-orbit splitting, since the spin-orbit param(cid:173)
`eter S5<l is about 103 cm-l, whereas the crystal-field
`splitting amounts to 1()4 cm-l or more.7 For nearly all
`compounds mentioned in the tables the symmetry of
`the lanthanide site is known, so that it is possible to
`compare the experimentally observed number of Sd
`levels and the number expected from the site symmetry.
`Not in all cases a reasonable agreement was found.
`
`Consider, for example, YOCl-Ce and YPOcCe. The
`respective site symmetries are C4v and D2d, so that 3
`and 4 levels are expected. The experimental numbers
`(Table I) are 2 and 3, respectively. It cannot be
`excluded, however, that there are levels beyond the
`spectral limit of our apparatus ('"'-'220 m,u) or that lower
`symmetrical splittings remain hidden in the broad
`bands observed experimentally. We never observed
`more bands than expected from the site-symmetry.
`In Table IV we have tabulated those host lattices for
`which the number of levels observed experimentally
`agrees reasonably well with the number expected from
`site symmetry.
`From these data the cubic crystal-field splitting 6.
`and the center of gravity of the Sd levels can be found,
`at least approximately. In Y3AhOl2-Ce the CeH ion
`occupies a distorted cube, so that the Sd level is split
`into a lower doublet and a higher triplet by the cubic
`component of the crystal field. Noncubic components
`cause a further splitting. Unfortunately we observed
`only two components of the triplet, which causes some
`uncertainty in the value of 6. and the position of the
`center of gravity. In ScB03-Ce and SC2Si207-Ce the
`
`:;1
`
`t
`~
`~50
`~
`"" ;i
`t 0
`
`350
`
`300
`
`250
`A(mp)_
`
`100
`
`'0'
`~
`.~
`50~
`~
`t
`
`0
`200
`
`lfOO
`'8
`!
`~ 50
`j
`t 0
`
`600
`
`100
`
`i
`.s
`50j
`
`t
`
`FIG. 1. Diffuse reflection spectrum (broken line) and relative
`excitation spectrum (solid line) of the Ce3+ fluorescence of
`YO.99CeO.OlAlzB4Ot2.
`
`7 G. Blasse and A. Bril, Philips Res. Repts. 22, 481 (1967).
`
`FIG. 2. Diffuse reflection spectrum (broken line) and relative
`excitation spectrum (solid line) of the Ce3+ fluorescence of
`Y2.94Ceo.ooAI,OI2. The dotted line represents the diffuse reflection
`spectrum of unactivated Y,AI,OI2.
`
`TCL 1026, Page 2
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

`

`I N V EST I GAT ION 0 F SO M E C e s+ - ACT I V ATE D PH 0 S P H 0 R S
`
`5141
`
`TABLE II. Position of emission and excitation bands and Stokes shift of the emission of some Ce3+ phosphors
`(inefficient at room temperature).'
`
`Composition
`
`Y,AJ,09-Ce
`SrY,O,-Ce
`Y 20 a-Ce
`~aY02-Ce
`NaGdO,-Ce
`LaAl03-Ce
`
`Emission bands
`(103 em-I)
`
`Excitation bands
`(l(}1 em-I)
`
`Stokes shift
`(loa em-I)
`
`(~28); 31.2
`17.4b
`19.6; (~24)
`(~21.3); 22.8
`21.3
`
`32.6; ~34; ~41.5
`25.2; ?
`?
`
`"-'4.5
`~8
`
`24. 2; 31. 2; ~40°
`
`• For explanation of columms see Table 1.
`
`C Data from reflection :3vectrum.
`
`Ce3+ ion occupies distorted octahedra, so that the triplet
`is lower. In YAlaB 40 12-Ce the Ce3+ ion is in a trigonal
`prism of 02- ions. The 2D level splits into three levels
`with symmetry species E', Ai', and E" (31000,36600,
`and 39200 cm-1, respectively). This corresponds to a
`cubic crystal-field splitting of 6500 cm- 1 (see Appendix).
`Finally Table IV contains analogous data for
`SrF2 : Ce3+ recently given by Loh.3 Although our results
`are not accurate, Table IV gives some interesting results.
`The 4f-5d distance is 51 000 cm-1 in the free Ce3+ ion.
`This value decreases to 48 000 cm-1 in fluorides and to
`roughly 35 000 cm-1 in oxides, a reduction of 6% and
`30%, respectively. This fact must be ascribed to the
`reduction of the interelectronic repulsion parameters
`by covalency effects (nephelauxetic effect8). Within
`the group of oxidic host lattices there is even a variation
`of this value. For example, ScBOa-Ce has the center of
`the 5d level at "-'32 500 em-i. On the other hand, the
`value in the case of LaPOcCe must be considerably
`higher than the 35000 cm-1 mentioned above (see
`Table I). In our paper on Tb3+-activated phosphors7
`we have already drawn attention to this fact. The
`Tb3+-activated phosphors show excitation bands due to
`
`TABLE III. Efficiency for cathode-ray excitation and position
`of the two lower absorption bands and of the emission band in
`the visible region for some Ce3+-activated garnets.
`
`Composition
`
`'1(%)
`
`Emission
`Position lower
`absorption bands bands in the
`(difference hetween
`visible
`brackets)
`region
`(l03 em-I)
`(lOS em-I).
`
`YI.5GdI .• AI50'2-Ce
`Y3AI50 12-Ce
`Y3Al4GaOI2-Ce
`YaAlaGa2012-Ce
`YaAJ,Gaa012-Ce
`YaGa.OI2-Ce
`
`... b
`3.5
`1.9
`1.7
`1.2
`
`21.5,29.6(8.1)
`22.0,29.4(7.4)
`22.5,29.1(6.6)
`23.0,28.8(5.8)
`23.3,28.6(5.3)
`23.8,28.1(4.3)
`
`17.4
`18.2
`18.5
`19.2
`19.6(18.3)
`••• c
`
`• Shoulders between parentheses.
`b Emission contains Eul + contributions due to the starting material
`Gd,O •• which contains a slight amount of europium.
`C No fluorescence.
`
`8 C. K. J¢rgensen, Absorption Spectra and Chemical BOllding
`(Pergamon Press, Inc., New York, 1962).
`
`4f--t5d transitions in the Tb3+ ion. These bands are at
`higher wavenumbers than those of Ce3+ and partly
`beyond the shorter-wavelength limit of our apparatus,
`so that it was not possible to find the center of gravity
`in the case of Tb3+.
`Table IV also shows that the cubic crystal-field
`splitting .1 varies strongly. For a cube the absolute
`value of .1 is expected to be 8/9 times the value of .1
`for an octahedron with the same distances between
`central ion and ligand.9 With this in mind all values of
`.1 in Table IV can be compared with each other. The
`.1 in YaAh012-Ce is relatively large, whereas .1 in
`YAlaB 40 12-Ce is relatively small. That .1 is strongly
`influenced by the nature of the next-nearest neighbors
`is a well-known phenomenon.lO,n We further note that
`.1 in the fluorides has the same order of magnitude as in
`the oxides. This has also been found for the transition(cid:173)
`metal ions.8
`The value of the noncubic crystal-field splitting varies
`considerably. For some host lattices it is possible to
`compare the splitting of the lower cubic crystal-field
`level of the Sri state of Ce3+ and the 4f5d state of TbH .
`The agreement is very good (Table V).
`The phenomenon that the efficiency of Ce:H- -activated
`phosphors is more or less independent of the position
`of the excitation band in some cases (Fig. 1), but
`decreases strongly for excitatiOl1 in bands with higher
`
`~100 t
`~
`g
`.~ 50
`1;
`<t
`
`t 0
`
`400
`
`100
`l
`.Ii
`50~
`d:
`t
`
`0
`200
`
`FIG. 3. Diffuse reflection spectrum (broken line) and relative
`excitation spectrum (solid line) of the Ce3+ fluorescence of
`SCO.99CeO.OlBO, .
`
`9 J. S. Griffith, The Theory of Transition-Metal Ions (Cambridge
`University Press, Cambridge, 1961).
`10 J. Ferguson, K. Knox, and D. C. Wood, J. Chern. Phys.
`35,2236 (1961);37, 193 (1962).
`11 G. masse, J. Inorg. Nuc!. Chern. 29,1817 (1967).
`
`TCL 1026, Page 3
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

`

`5142
`
`G. BLASSE AND A. BRIL
`
`T ABLE IV. The sa levels and cubic crystal-field splitting (.:l) for CeB+ in several host lattices. All values in loa em-I.
`
`Composition
`
`YsAlo01.--Ce
`Y AlsB4OI.--Ce
`ScBOrCe
`
`Sc,Si,O,Ce
`
`SrF.--Ceb
`Free ionb
`
`Coordination
`of CeB+
`
`5d levels
`(observed) •
`
`Deduced
`cubic levels
`
`Cubic crystal-
`field splitting (.:l)
`
`Spherical
`5d
`
`Distorted cube (D,)
`Trigonal prism (DaA)
`Distorted octahedron
`(Dad)
`Distorted octahedron
`(C,)
`Distorted cube
`
`22.0 29.4137 44
`31.0 36.6 39.2
`28.031.2136.1 38.5 ",29.5 (I,.), 37.3 (e.)
`
`25.7 (e.), ",40 (t,.)
`
`29.033.3143.5
`
`",31 (t,.), "'43.5 (e.)
`
`33.6 48.8150.3 53.4
`
`41. 2 (eu), 52.4(tt.)
`
`",14
`",6.5·
`",8
`
`"'12.5
`
`11.2
`
`",34.5
`35.4
`",32.5
`
`",35
`
`48
`51
`
`• Vertical bar indicates separation between lower and higher cubic levels.
`b After Ref. 3.
`
`• Value of the octahedral crystal-field splitting derived from the position
`of the levels for Ce'+ in prismatic coordination using a point-charge model
`(see Appendix).
`
`wavenumbers in other cases (Figs. 2 and 3), is probably
`due to the position of the configuration coordinate
`curves relative to each other. Let us call the configura(cid:173)
`tion coordinate curves of the ground state and the two
`lowest excited states g, el, and e2, respectively (el is
`below e2)' If the curve el crosses the curve e2 within the
`configuration coordinate curve of g, excitation into el
`and e2 may both result in efficient fluorescence from el.
`If on extrapolation the curves el and e2 should cross
`outside the curve g, however, excitation into el gives
`efficient fluorescence from el, but excitation into e2
`cannot give efficient fluorescence from el, since either
`fluorescence from e2 or radiationless transition to g
`results. If the "crossings" of e2 with el and g approach
`each other, weak fluorescence from el and e2 may be
`expected upon excitation into e2. From this simple
`model it follows that a Ce3+-activated phosphor with an
`excitation spectrum in which the efficiency decreases
`with increasing excitation energy, must show fluores(cid:173)
`cence from e2 upon excitation into e2 (or higher levels) .
`This was in fact observed (see below).
`
`IV. EMISSION
`
`A. Results
`
`The positions of the emission peaks of our samples
`are collected in Tables I-III. Figures 4-11 show the
`spectral energy distribution of the emission of a number
`
`of compounds. Usually the emission is in the near-uv
`region, but not always: Ya(AI, Ga)s012-Ce and SrY20 c
`Ce (Figs. 5 and 10) show emission in the visible. The
`half-width value of the emission bands does not depend
`on their position and amounts to roughly 4000 cm-l
`for all materials. In some cases the· emission band is
`split, the difference between the two"peaks being some
`2000 cm-l (LaBOa-Ce, Fig. 4; YBOa-Ce, Fig. 9;
`YAIaB40 12-Ce and YP04-Ce, Table I). In many cases
`more than one emission band is present (LaBOa-Ce,
`Fig. 4; YaAloOI2-Ce, Fig. 5; ScBOa-Ce, Fig. 6; Sc2Si207-
`Ce, Fig. 7; and Y4AI20 9-Ce, Fig. 11).
`
`B. Discussion
`
`The fluorescence emission of the Ce3+ ion originates
`from a transition from one or more of the sd levels
`(often only the lowest level) to the 2F ground state.
`Since the ground state of the Ce3+ ion is a doublet
`(2Fs/2 and 2F7/2) with a separation of about 2000 cm-I,
`each emission band is expected to show two peaks as
`found by us in many cases (compare also Ref. 12). This
`doublet character of the emission band depends on
`temperature and Ce3+ concentration (self-absorption)
`and is not always found.la
`In the case of oxidic host lattices this emission usually
`peaks in the near uv. As a matter of fact there are two
`
`I
`
`100,-----,....------,
`t
`
`I t
`
`FIG. 4. Spectral energy distribution of the fluorescence of
`Lao .•• CeO.01BOs under 254-m~ excitation. In Figs. 5-12 the!radiant
`power per constant wavelength interval in arbitrary units (1) is
`plotted along the ordinate.
`
`FIG. 5. Spectral energy distribution of the fluorescence of
`Y2.94Ceo.OtIAI.012 (solid line) and Y2,94Ceo.OtIAI,GaaOu (broken
`line) under 254-m~ excitation.
`
`12 F. A. Kroger and J. Bakker, Physica 8, 628 (1941).
`13 Th. P. J. Botden, Philips Res. Rept. 7, 197 (1952).
`
`TCL 1026, Page 4
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

`

`I N V EST I GAT ION 0 F SO M E C e a+ - ACT I V ATE D PH 0 S PH 0 R S
`
`5143
`
`TABLE V. Splitting of the lower cubic crystal-field componeI?-t
`of the Stllevel of CeI+ and the 4f75d level of Tbl + (all values In
`1()3 em-I).
`
`Host lattice
`
`YaAL.012
`YaGa6012
`YBO,
`S~Si207
`
`• From Tables I and nl.
`b From Ref. 7.
`
`7.4
`4.3
`",,1.6
`4.3
`
`7.5
`4.0
`1.4
`4.6
`
`cases in which the emission will be at lower wave num(cid:173)
`bers.
`
`(a) If the lowest 5d level lies exceptionally low.
`(b) If the Stokes shift of the emission is exceptionally
`large.
`
`We have found one example of each of these two cases.
`In YgAloOl2-Ce the lowest 5d level is exceptionally
`low, viz., at 22000 cm-I (see Table I). The YgAl60 IrCe
`is the only Ce3+-activated phosphor that has not a
`white, but a yellow body color, whereas the host lattice
`itself is white. Therefore, the emission lies also at very
`low wavenumbers. Note in Table I that the Stokes
`shift of this emission does not have a value deviating
`from what is normally found. Table IV shows, why the
`lowest 5d level lies so very low. The center of the 5d
`levels of Ce3+ in YgAl50 I2 has a normal value. In Sec. III
`we have found that the crystal-field splitting in YgAh012
`is very large. Moreover, the lower cubic level is the CD
`level, which is iLl below the center. In an octahedro?
`the t2D level is lower (only fLl below the center). ThIS
`means that the lower cubic crystal-field component is
`relatively low in YgAloOI2 (25700 cm-I, compared with
`",,30 000 cm-I for the lower t20 level of ScBOrCe and
`SC2Si20,Ce). There is yet another effect, viz., the large
`g+ in YgAloO,2,
`non cubic splitting of the CD level of Ce
`which brings the lowest level at 22 000 cm-I • Visible
`Ce3+ emission can therefore be expected, if the 5d
`crystal-field splitting and the lower symmetrical split(cid:173)
`ting are large. Cubic eight coordination is also favorable
`to obtain visible emission, because the lower cubic level
`.
`will then be at relatively low energies.
`It is obvious that long-wavelength emission will.also
`
`lO'o..--~------------,
`
`I
`
`t
`
`1001~---=,------;; ......... , - - - - - - - - -
`
`I t
`
`350
`
`4-50
`400
`--A(mpJ
`
`FIG. 7. Spectral energy distribution of the fluorescence of
`SC1.9SCeo.02Si20 7 under 254-m~ excitation .
`
`result in the case of a very large Stokes shift. This is
`the case for SrY20 C Ce. The lowest 5d level is not
`exceptionally low (25200 em-I), but the Stokes shift
`is very large (",8000 cm-I, compare Tables I and II),
`so that visible emission results (Fig. 10), Such a large
`Stokes shift can only occur if the difference between
`the equilibrium distance of the excited state and that
`of the ground state is larger than usual. EisewhereI4 we
`have argued that the increase of the equilibrium dis(cid:173)
`tance upon excitation will be large if the ions of the
`host lattice are rather weakly bounded together, i.e.,
`if large and low-charged ions are involved (this implies
`ions with relatively highly polarization or, as they are
`sometimes called, "soft" ions'S) • Such a situation exists
`in SrY20 4• We also noted weak fluorescence in the visible
`region in the case of Y20 g-Ce, Na Y02-Ce, and NaGd02-
`Ce (Table II). These are also lattices with large cations.
`The same holds for YOCI-Ce, LaOCI-Ce, and LaOBr(cid:173)
`Ce (Table I), but the oxychlorides emit in the uv. Note,
`however, that the Stokes shift of these materials is also
`large.
`Another consequence of a large increase of the
`equilibrium distance upon excitation is a low quenching
`temperature of the fluorescence. For SrY20 C Ce we
`found that the light output at 200 0 K is only 20% of
`the output at loo oK. Such a marked temperature
`dependence agrees with out model. In a number of
`other lattices with large ions (Sr2LaAI06-Ce, SrLaAI04-
`Ce, LaAlOa-Ce) the Ce3+ emission was absent or only
`very weak, even at liquid-nitrogen temperature.
`
`1001r---------~,---------------,
`
`I
`
`t
`
`50
`
`~).(mP)4-50
`
`500
`
`the fluorescence of
`FIG. 6. Spectral energy distribution of
`SCO.99CeO.OIBO. under 254-m,u excitation.
`
`FIG. 8. Spectral energy distribution of the fluorescence of
`YO.99CeO.OIOCI under 254-m,u excitation.
`-----
`14 G. Blasse and A. Bril, Z. Physik.. Chern. (Frankfur~). "T).1e
`influence of crystal structure on the fluorescence of oXldlC DlO(cid:173)
`bates and related compounds" (to be published).
`15 Compare C. K. J¢rgensen, Coord. Chern. Rev. 1, 164 (1966).
`
`TCL 1026, Page 5
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

`

`5144
`
`G. BLASSE AND A. BRIL
`
`I
`
`rool.---__ ~----------~
`t
`
`50
`
`FIG. 9. Spectral en(cid:173)
`ergy distribution of the
`fluorescence of
`YO.99Ceo. 01BO,
`under 254-mlL excita(cid:173)
`tion.
`
`Finally we note that also the nature of the ligands
`influences the position of the emission bands. For
`fluorides the center of the 5d level is at high energies
`resulting in emission at high energies (LaFa-Ce: 3S 700
`and 33300 cm-I, SrF2-Ce: 32200 cm-12). In the less
`electronegative chlorides
`the emission
`lies
`lower
`(LaCla-Ce: 28 500 cm-I 2). A similar phenomenon
`occurs in LaOCI-Ce and LaOBr-Ce (Table I). If the
`CI- ion of LaOCI is replaced by the less electronegative
`Be ion, the emission shifts to the visible region (due to
`the decreasing 4f-Sd energy difference).
`In many cases more than one Cea-+- -emission band is
`present. The band at higher wavenumbers is undoubt(cid:173)
`edly due to fluorescence from higher 5d levels. This
`phenomenon is not unknown, but has only been found
`at low temperature.12 ,16 In our investigations it was
`observed at room temperature in the case of LaBOa-Ce,
`Sc2Si207-Ce,
`and
`ScBOa-Ce, Ya(AI,GahOI2-Ce,
`Y4AI20 9-Ce (Tables I and II). It is noteworthy that
`the two emission bands are better separated, if the
`energy difference between the two lowest 5d levels
`increases. The YaAlsOI2-Ce shows this very markedly
`(Table I) : the lowest levels are at 22000 and 29400
`cm-I, the emission bands at 18200 and 27800 (and
`",29200) cm-I .
`The compounds with more than one emission band
`also exhibit the type of excitation spectrum in which
`the efficiency decreases on increasing excitation energy.
`The compounds with only one emission band have the
`other type of excitation spectrum. In the preceding
`section it was already shown that the former combina(cid:173)
`tion is not unexpected. At the moment our knowledge
`of the configuration coordinate curves of systems like
`those under consideration is inadequate to discuss this
`fOq----_______ --:;:,.....-'""' _______ --,
`I
`t
`
`50
`
`t~V---5~OO~--,5t,~,----OOO~h---6~~~---J~
`---A (m}')
`
`FIG. 10. Spectral energy distribution of the fluorescence of
`SrY!.9SCeO.0204 at nOK under 365-lllp excitation.
`
`16 G. R. Fonda and F. J. Studer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 1007
`(1948) •
`
`phenomenon further. As shown in Fig. 11, Y~209-Ce
`shows mainly fluorescence from e2 (31200 cm-I) and
`only weak fluorescence from el (28000 cm-I). In
`Sc2Si20,Ce both emission bands have equal intensity,
`in LaBOa-Ce, YaAloOI2-Ce, and ScB03-Ce the el
`fluorescence is more intense. The intensity ratio of the
`two emission bands may be obscured by self-absorption
`or energy transfer of the type e2+g-tg+el' The latter
`mechanism results in el fluorescence upon excitation into
`
`V. THE SYSTEM Ya(Al,Ga)SOI2-Ce
`
`The system Ya(AI, Ga)SOI2-Ce was studied in more
`detail. Results are given in Table III and Fig. 6. The
`Y3Ga;,OI2-Ce does not fluoresce under long- or short(cid:173)
`wave uv or cathode-ray excitation. The energy of all
`these types of excitation is mainly absorbed by the
`host lattice. The absence of Ce3+ fluorescence is probably
`due to inefficient energy transfer from lattice to activa(cid:173)
`tor. This fact may also explain the decrease of the
`efficiency for cathode-ray excitation with increasing Ga
`content (Table III). Figure 5 shows that with increas(cid:173)
`ing Ga content the ratio of uv to visible emission de-
`
`~0r---'~--------,
`
`I t
`
`50
`
`FIG. 11. Spectral energy
`distribution of the fluores(cid:173)
`cence of Yu6Ceo.04A120 9
`under 254-m,u excitation.
`
`creases. This again may be due to absorption of the uv
`emission of the Ce3+ activator by the Ga3+ ions of the
`host lattice.
`Table III shows that the splitting of the lower cubic
`crystal-field component decreases regularly from 7400
`cm-I for Ce3+ in YaAloOI2 to 4300 cm-I for Ce3+ in
`Y;;GasOI2. The visible emission band shifts therefore to
`the blue with increasing Ga content. That the deviation
`from cubic site symmetry is larger in YaAlsOI2 than in
`YaGasOI2 has also been found from studies on Pr3+_
`activated garnets,17 Tb3+-activated garnets,7 and from
`crystallographic investigations.ls As argued above, the
`large deviation from cubic symmetry in the case of
`YaAlsOI2 shifts the fluorescence emission into the visible
`region. Replacing y3+ by Gd3+ results in an even larger
`splitting (see Table III).
`Elsewhere we have reported that under cathode-ray
`excitation YaAloOI2-Ce shows only a very weak uv
`emission in addition to the efficient visible fluorescence. 4
`In the present model this can only be explained by
`assuming that the excitation energy of the lattice IS
`transferred directly to the lowest excited state (el)'
`17 F. N. Hooge, J. Chern. Phys. 45, 4505 (1966).
`18 F. Euler and J. A. Bruce, Acta Cryst. 19, 971 (1965).
`
`TCL 1026, Page 6
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

`

`I N V EST I GAT ION 0 F SO M E C e 3 + - ACT I V ATE D PH 0 S P H 0 R S
`
`5145
`
`VI. ENERGY TRANSFER FROM Ce3+ TO
`OTHER IONS
`Energy transfer from Ce3+ to Ce3+ and to SmH, Eu3+,
`TbH, and Dy3+ in some of the host lattices mentioned
`in this paper has been described and discussed else(cid:173)
`where.19 Transfer from Ce3+ to Cr3+ in YAhB 40 12 was
`mentioned recently.20 Because of the anomalous emis(cid:173)
`sion of CeH in Y3AI.OI2 energy transfer from Ce3+ to
`Sm3+, EuH, Tb3+, Dy3+, and Cr3+ was also studied in
`this host lattice. This was done by exciting Y3AloOI2-
`Ce, X (X= Sm3+, Eu3+, Tba, Dy3+, or Cr3+) in the
`CeH-excitation band at 29400 cm-l • The absorption
`of CeH in this region is much more intense than that of
`X, so that nearly all excitation energy is absorbed by
`CeH. If X is a lanthanide ion, the emission under these
`circumstances is still mainly Ce3+ emission, which indi(cid:173)
`cates an inefficient transfer from CeH to the other four
`lanthanide ions; if X= Cr3+, however, the emission is
`mainly Cr3+ emission,21 so that the Ce3+---+Cr3+ transfer
`is efficient. These results agree with our previous con(cid:173)
`siderationsI9.2o: if the CeH emission overlaps the absorp(cid:173)
`tion lines of the 41-4f transitions of other lanthanide
`ions (which is here the case), energy transfer occurs by
`exchange interaction and is not efficient. In the case of
`CeH-Cr3+ in YaAlsOl2 the visible and uv emission of
`the Ce3+ ion overlaps the Cr3+ absorption bands con(cid:173)
`siderably: the visible mission overlaps
`the broad
`absorption band of Cr3+ between 15 000 and 20 000
`cm-l (4A~4T2), the uv emission that between 21000
`and 27 000 cm-l (4 A~4TI) .22 This gives rise to efficient
`energy transfer as in YAhB 40 12: Ce, Cr.20 In the borate,
`however, only the 4A2---+4TI absorption is overlapped by
`the Ce3+ emission.
`
`Note added in proof: We have recently found that
`at 4.2°K the visible emission band of Y sAIo0trCe con-
`18 G. Blasse and A. Bril, J. Chern. Phys. 47, 1920 (1967).
`20 G. Blasse and A. Bril, Phys. Letters, 25, A29 (1967).
`21 The emission of YaA1;OlrCr has been reported by G. Bums,
`E. A. Geiss, B. A. Jenkins, and M. 1. Nathan, Phys. Rev. 139,
`A1687 (1965).
`!2 D. L. Wood, J. Ferguson, K. Knox, and J. F. Dillon Jr., J.
`Chern. Phys. 39,890 (1963).
`
`I
`
`,
`
`~r-E"
`___ -l~ ... - -A f
`, , ,
`\""---E'
`
`FIG. 12. Trigonal-prismatic coordination of Ce3+ in Y tU,B.OI1
`(left-hand side) and splitting of the 2D level of Ce3+ under D3/o
`symmetry (right-hand side). The black circle represents Ce3+,
`open circled represents 02-.
`
`sists also of two bands located at 19 100 and 17 400
`cm-I, respectively.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors are greatly indebted to Miss M. P. Bol,
`Miss D. J. M. Trumpie and Mr. C. J. Loyen, Mr. J. A.
`de Poorter, and Mr. J. de Vries for their assistance in
`the experimental part of the work.
`
`APPENDIX
`
`In a trigonal prism (D31o symmetry) the fivefold
`degenerate 2D level of the Ce3+ ion splits into three
`levels (E', AI" and E", see Fig. 12). The energy differ(cid:173)
`ence between E' and E" is
`(47r )-1/2 (0.37')'2Q1''''2+ 1. 78'Y.r0f4)
`
`and that between E' and AI'
`(47r)-1/2(0.S~20f2-1.78'Y 4Of"),
`
`whereas in a regular octahedron the splitting is
`
`Here'Y are parameters characteristic of the surroundings
`and fk= (Rn! I rk I Rn1 ), where Rnl denotes the radial
`one-electron wavefunctions. Using these formulas it is
`possible to deduce the cubic crystal-field splitting from
`the levels observed experimentally for the prismatic
`coordination.
`
`TCL 1026, Page 7
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:03:24
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket