`5,242,536
`Schoenborn
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`US005242536A
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`[54] ANISOTROPIC POLYSILICON ETCHING
`PROCESS
`
`Philippe Schoenborn, San Jose, Calif.
`Inventor:
`[75]
`[73] Assignee: LSI Logic Corporation, Milpitas,
`Calif.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 632,461
`
`Dec. 20, 1990
`(22] Filed:
`[52]
`Eint, CS oe ccecesessestessssssesssesees HOIL 21/00
`[52] U.S. Ch.ceeccesneneetenees 156/643; 156/646;
`156/657; 156/662
`[58] Field of Search................ 656/657, 662, 643, 646
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5/1984 Purdes 00...
`4,450,042
`ecesssessseeeeee 156/643
`
`4,490,209 12/1984 Hartman.......
`» 156/646 X
`3/1985 Carteret al.
`..
`4,502,915
`156/646 X
`
`escssesceseeseeese 156/643
`4,521,275
`6/1985 Purdes «0.0.0...
`4,799,991
`1/1989 Dockrey oo... cesesecesesenes 156/643
`
`4,867,841
`9/1989 Loewenstein et al.
`156/657 X
`5/1990 Beechko ou... sesssceeessseeeneene 156/657
`4,929,301
`
`
`4,943,344 7/1990 Tachi etal.
`156/643
`
`8/1990 Rossen on.
`ceeccseseeeeseeee 156/643
`4,948,462
`eccsecessereesenes 156/657 X
`7/1988 Taou oo.ce
`5,007,982,
`
`« 156/657 X
`5,013,398
`5/1991 Longet al.
`
`veatee 437/233
`7/1991 Amini etal. ..
`5,030,590
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`1984,
`Oct.-Dec.
`A2(4),
`Technol.,
`Sci.
`0734-2101/84/041537-13,
`1984, American Vacuum
`Society.
`Controlled Film Formation during CCl, Plasma Etching,
`Bernacki and Kosicki, J. Electrochem. Soc., Aug.,
`1984,
`Selectivity and Feature Size Control, Dry Etching.
`
`Primary Examiner—Thi Dang
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-—Gerald E. Linden; Michael
`D.Rostoker
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`in
`process
`etching
`polysilicon
`anisotropic
`An
`Ch/HBr/Heis disclosed. The use of HBr allows etch-
`ing to occur under high poly:oxide selectivity condi-
`tions (e.g., above 40:1) that would otherwise produce
`lateral etching of the poly under the photoresist mask
`(isotropy). Theselectivity of poly:resist is also increased
`(e.g., above 4:1). Poly sidewall passivation is enhanced
`without relying on resist redeposition. Gate oxide loss is
`also minimized, and anisotropy is realized with in-
`creased overetch (e.g., 60%). Exemplary processset-
`tings are: 1) 250 mTorr, 190 Watts, 0.5 cm gap, 100 sccm
`Clz, 50 sccm HBr and 40 sccm He; and 2) 270 mTorr,
`200 Watts, 0.5 cm gap, 80 sccm Clz, 55 sccm HBrand 45
`sccm He.
`
`Relation between the RF discharge parameters andplasma
`etch rates, selectivity and anisotropy, Zarowin, J. Vac.
`
`19 Claims, 16 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CHLORINE PROCESS:
`PURE CHLORINE/ He PROCESS:
`30:1 POLY: OXIDE AND
`
`LOW PRESSURE,
`
`
`1.6:1 POLY: RESIST SELECTIVITY,
`
`LOW POWER,
`
`
`VERTICAL PROFILE WITH
`HIGH SELECTIVITY,
`
`
`<50% OVERETCH,
`BUT ISOTROPIC
`
`
`OCCASIONAL NOTCHING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HIGH SELECTIVITIES AND
`
`
`VERTICAL PROFILES WITH
`
`
`LONG OVERETCH
`
`
`
`
`Page | of 25
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 25
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1017
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 1 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`je CO
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`RE-ENTRANT OR
`NEGATIVE, NOT
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`NOTCHED
`NOT ACCEPTABLE
`
`FIG._1A
`
`FIG__18
`
`FIG_IC
`
`SIDEWALL PROFILE
`
`
`
`POLYSILICON
`
`
`
`ALL OF THE SIDEWALL PROFILE
`MUST BE IN THIS HALF-PLAN
`
`
`SUBSTRATE
`
`FIG. 1D
`
`Page 2 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 25
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 2 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`
`
`FIG. 2A
`
`FIG. 2B
`
`
`
`FIG. 4
`
`FIG. 5
`
`Page 3 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 25
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 3 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`
`
`>$S300Ud9H/3NINOIHD3YNd
`
`*JYNSS3YdMOT
`
`‘Y3MOdMOl
`
`
`
`"ALIAILOS13SHOIH
`
`
`
`MdONLOSILNG
`
`
`
`
`
`:S$S300UdJNIYOTHD
`
`
`
`ONV301XO:A10dI-O€
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ALIAILIST3SLSISSY:A10d1:9'l
`
`
`
`HLIM311d0¥dWOIILYZA
`
`
`
`*HIL3Y3AO%O0S>
`
`
`
`SNIHDLONIWNOISVDDO
`
`Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`ONYS3ILIAILD3T39SHOIM
`
`
`
`HLIMS31140UdWWOILY3A
`
`
`
`HIL3YSAOONOT
`
`£IIA
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 4 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`002
`
`O6!
`
`o9!
`
`os!
`
`
`
`crecenne-(uwwd)31v¥HOL3A1Od
`
`6rsraorst"
`
`
`
`(Ulw/WU)31VHHOLZ3aIxo
`4Ov(W99S):ostM014!WLOL
`HOzI
`6°erarorsi
` ————
`
`(UIW/WU)31VeHIL33GIxXO
`
`
`
`(M4)YIMOd
`
`(.1N3LNOD48H%OS)
`
`39Ils
`
`
`
`
`
`(MO14IWLOLWO9SSZI)
`
`
`
`(M4)Y3aMOd
`
` YIDd
`
`4gH
`
`LN3LNOD
`
`(%)
`
`Page 5 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 25
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 5 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
` HWW———(%/\)N/A10d
`sececctees(%)MA10d
`
`wooceceee(%)NA10d
`
`WATVWL
`
`
`(%/1)A/TAIOd
`
`4JQH
`
`LN3LNOD
`
`(%)
`
`
`
`(M4)Y3MOd
`
`
`
`(M014TWLOLWD9S002)
`
`
`
`(MA)YIMOd
`
`
`
`(1N3LNODJ8H%OE)
`
`SLIOLLidONY‘NSALINMOSINN31V¥
`
`HOL9AWdOLLISL93NIGJOSLOTNd)
`ALINYOSINATwNLoW°(N71)°3SY3ANI
`
`
`C2/7yl/NIO3138V7SI
`
`
`SLIOLL132ONY“(N)“ALINMOJINA3178
`
`
`
`ALINYOSZINATWNLIW“(N/1)“3SU3ANI
`HOL3A1OdOLLIdLOZNIG40SLONd)
`217¥44NIO37138V7SI
`
`c
`
` GZDIA
`
` YLOI
`
`TWILOL
`
`M014
`
`(WI9S)
`
`Page 6 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 25
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 6 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`6rsrargrsi
`3OIXO:A10d9*ALIAILD313S
`(AN3LNODJGHW%OE)
`
`
`(M¥)Y3MOd
`9=‘ALIAILD373S 1
`3GIXO:A10d
`
` ge9/4
`
`
`
`(MA)YIMOd
`
`
`
`(M0143TWLOLWO9SSZ!)
`
` V8Id
`
`3SV34930
`
`LOCO
`s\
`
`LL
`
`3SVIYONIA
`
`82
`
`v2
`
`02
`
`ZeIN3SLNOD©
`
`(%)
`
`48H
`
`Page 7 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 25
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 7 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`6r"eI"4"onst"
`6t"erarorsi"
` LSIS3Y:A1Od
`
`
`
`(IN3LNODJAH%OF)
`
` 96Id
`
`My-YaMOd
`
`
`
`(MO14TWLOLWI0SSZI)
`
`My-YaMOd
`
` V691s
`
`LSIS3Y=A1Od
`
`ALIAILD3973S
`
`ALIAILI313S
`
`Page 8 of 25
`
`—48H
`
`LN3LNOD
`
`(%)
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 25
`
`
`
`
`U.S.Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 8 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`
`
`(wu)$SOTdd
`
`007
`
`O61
`
`aI
`
`oo!
`
`os!M014
`
`W1L0L
`
`(W99S)
`
`
`
`(wu)SSO709
`
`Osi
`
`ergt"rayorsi"
`6I"st"ar91si"
`
`M™-Y3MOd
`
`
`
`(.LN3LNODJ@H%OF)
`
`
`
`GOl‘Dd
`
`
`
`
`
`(MO14TWLOLWOISSZ!)
`
`My-Y3MOd
`
` YO!
`‘91d
`
`IN3LNOD
`
`49H
`
`(%)
`
`Page 9 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`5,242,536
`
` GilDd|Y/lDd
`
`
`
`Sheet 9 of 16
`
`Oo»928v2C6!at"ast"
`
`
`%-LN3LNOD40HM4-Y3MOd
`
`
`
`
`
`(U3MOdMNZI)|(MO14TWLOLWOISSZ!)
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`
`
`(y)SSO13a0Ixo
`
`
`
`48H
`
`LN3LNOD
`
`(%)
`
`Page 10 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 25
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 10 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`
`
` geOd
`
`0".
`
`(43MO0dM»6i')
`
`
`
`(UaMOdMEI") (uiw/wu)
`enon----(uswwd)31veHOL3A1O0d
`
`
`JGHWI9SSS)YYOL22°)(MO1S“TWLOLWI9S002)(.1N3LNOD
`
`
`
`31V¥HDL330IXO
`(3UNSS3Ud
` YI!IIs
`
`
`wroteon(uiwswe)JiveHOL3A1Od
`
`(LN3LNODJ@HWO9SSS)
`
`(MO14IWLOLWI9S002)
`
`(LN3LNOD21D%OF)
`
`
`
`(UIW/WU)31VY¥HIL330IXO
`
`G2"
`
`(YY4OL)
`
`3YNSS3Yd
`
`Page ll of 25
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 25
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 11 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`oo8soS+S2OS
`09°6s°99°ws’esos*
`
`
`
`(3YNSS3¥dYYOL22°)
`
`ws-dv9
`
`
`
` Gel‘9ld
`
`(AN3LNOD219%O¥)
`
`Wo~-d¥9
`
` ye!Id
`
`
`
`
`
`——-—---(%)“ALINYOJINN31VY¥HOLAA1Od
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LSISSY2AIOd‘ALIAILOS73S
`
`
`
`(%)‘ALINYOSINN3LV4HDLA1Od
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1SIS3Y2A10d‘ALIAILOS13S
`
`le
`
`3YuNSS3ud
`
`(YYOL)
`
`Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 12 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`Ae
`
`8¢
`
`ve
`
`Of
`
`zyIN3LNOD
`
`rABe)
`
`(%)
`
`
`
`(YYOL)3UNSSINd
`
`(dv9wog¢'0)
`
` goOd
`
`
`
`(YYOL)3UNSSIUd
`
`(av)wos°0)
`
` Vb!Dd
`
`
`
`w--o3--(%)‘ALINMOSINA31VYHOLSAIOd
`42°92°Sove”£2
`————_1SIS3Y2A10d‘ALIAILOI13S
`
`
`Le92°Se"ve£2"
`
`
`wornnn(ulw/wa)31V4HOLSA10d
`
`
`
`—————_(ujw/wu)31V8HIL330IXO
`
`
`
`..~~x0&“.“sw~~,‘XN‘\™
`
`N.
`
`8
`
`ve
`
`Of
`
`zyLINZLNOD
`
`(%)
`
`213
`
`Page 13 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 13 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 13 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`FIG ISA «FIG 15B
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 1EA
`
`FIG. 168
`
`Page 14 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 14 of 25
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 14 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`
`
`ETCHED
`
`THICKNESS 2800
`
`(R) =2400
`
`aN
`
`-
`
` UCL 3201.22
`
`6
`4
`OBSERVATIONS
`POLYSILICON LOSS AFTER BREAKTHROUGH
`AND 30 SEC MAIN ETCH STEP
`
`8
`
`iO
`
`sit
`
`|
`
`2200
`
`2000
`
`0
`
`|
`
`LCL 2175.87
`
`2
`
`FIG.
`
`I7A
`
`POLY
`UNIFORMITY
`
`(%)
`
`OBSERVATIONS
`POLY UNIFORMITY
`(BREAKTHROUGH AND
`MAIN ETCH STEP)
`
`FIG. 178
`
`|
`
`Page 15 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 15 of 25
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 15 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`OXIDE
`ETCH RATE
`(As min)
`
`120
`
`110
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`2)
`
`8
`&
`~
`
`g
`8
`\
`
`8
`a
`>
`
` 130
`
`°
`
`28 8
`>
`§
`&
`-
`=
`-
`
`DATE
`
`(OXIDE ETCH RATE
`DURING MAIN ETCH STEP)
`
`FIG. 17C
`
`POWER
`
`20
`
`GATE OXIDE (nm)
`
`(Kw)
`
`OVERETCH TIME (sec)
`
`FIG.
`
`IBA
`
`Page 16 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 16 of 25
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 7, 1993
`
`Sheet 16 of 16
`
`5,242,536
`
`
`
`
`
`(S3WILHOLZYIAOSNOIYVALv)
`
`(M¥)
`
`Y3MOd
`
`
`(998)3WILHOL3Y3A0
`
`31LV9
`
`(wu)301x0
`
`OS
`
`OvOf02
`
`Ol
`
`Oil
`
`G6
`
`o0’s
`
`‘9
`
`“\S’81
`
`oer
`
`O'LI
`
`csi
`
`31LV9
`
`O'vl
`Gl
`(wu)30Ixo
`
`Page. 17 of 25
`
`281Old
`
`
`
`98!Id
`
`
`
`(
`
`
`
`
`
`ST3A31Y3MOdSNOINVALV)
`
`
`
`Page 17 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`5,242,536
`
`2
`not during bulk poly removal. Hence, the amount of
`overetch must be limited.
`For purposes of the present disclosure, an etch is
`considered “anisotropic” if no point of the resulting
`polysilicon profile lies under the mask beyond 0.05 um
`from the mask edge at the mask-poly interface and after
`etching is completed, including overetch. This is illus-
`trated in FIG. 1D.
`Although etching and sidewall angle formation
`mechanismsare not well understood or characterized,it
`is widely recognized that the directionality and energy
`of ion bombardment from ions accelerated across the
`plasma sheath, and surface passivation mechanisms
`from redeposition of materials, play a major role in
`controlling anisotropy. (See, ¢.g., “Relation between
`the RF discharge parameters and plasma etch rates,
`selectivity and anisotropy”, C. B. Zarowin, J. Vac. Sci.
`Technol. A, Vol.2, No. 4, October-December 1984, and
`“Controlled Film Formation during CCl, Plasma Etch-
`ing”, S. E. Bernacki and B. B. Kosicki, J. Electrochem.
`Soc., Vol 131, No. 8, August, 1984.) For example, when
`a photoresist mask is used for patterning the poly gates,
`it can contribute to forming a protective film along the
`poly sidewall, thereby preventinglateral etching. Verti-
`cal profiles can also be obtained with oxide masks, in
`which case sidewall protection mayresult from redepo-
`sition of etched silicon-containing material, or from the
`gas-phase chemistry itself. In addition, the shape of the
`poly sidewall will depend on the poly doping level and
`the doping method (e.g., POCI3,
`implant). Heavily
`doped poly is morelikely to etch isotropically. Non-
`annealed, implanted poly tends to form a notch half way
`along the profile (See e.g., FIG. 1C), possibly at the
`location of peak dopant concentration, and it terminates
`by a “foot” at the oxide interface where dopant concen-
`tration is minimum.
`The use of Bromine (Br) containing plasmas is be-
`coming increasingly popular for high selectivity aniso-
`tropic poly etch. Comparedto chlorine, it is found to
`further increase the poly:oxide selectivity, and espe-
`cially the poly:resist selectivity, while maintaining an-
`isotropy with long overetch percentages (e.g., 100%).
`High selectivity still works against profile control, but
`the threshold of compromise is pushed far enough that
`one has to worry about other factors, such as removal
`of the passivation layer.
`Most, if not all, plasma etcher manufacturers now
`offer poly etch processes using bromine. Magnetically
`enhanced (magnetron) etchers from Materials Research
`Corp., such as the MRC Aries (Trademark), and Ap-
`plied Materials, such as the AMAT Precision 5000
`(Trademark), use Cl/HBr, while those from Tegal
`Corp., such as the MCR (Trademark), use pure Bro.
`Etchers from Lam Research Corp., such as the Rain-
`bow 4400
`(Trademark),
`offer
`a process
`using
`Cl2/HBr/He. These etchers have high selectivity and
`good profile control. Unfortunately, because bromine
`enhances sidewall passivation, it also forms a sidewall
`film that cannot always be stripped either in sulfur per-
`oxide or by ashing, but requires an HF dip. An HF dip
`is not desirable, mostly because it etches some of the
`gate oxide, but also because it adds a step to the process.
`In such a case, the advantage of high poly:oxide selec-
`tivity offered by using Br is partly lost.
`With previous methods of polysilicon (“poly’’) etch-
`ing, using Chlorine (Cl2), there has been an inherent
`compromise between anisotropy andselectivity to ox-
`ide. High selectivity processes tend to be isotropic.
`
`ANISOTROPIC POLYSILICON ETCHING
`PROCESS
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`The invention relates to semiconductor device fabri-
`cation, and more particularly to plasma etching of
`polysilicon.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`Plasma etch processes and apparatus are generally
`well known for etching materials for semiconductor
`device fabrication. The process begins with application
`of a masking material, such as photoresist, to a silicon
`‘wafer. The masking pattern protects areas of the wafer
`from the etch process. The wafer is then placed in a
`plasma reactor(“‘etcher”) and etched. Subsequent steps
`are determined by the type of device being fabricated.
`This process is especially valuable for the definition of
`small geometries.
`A commonsilicon etch process is based on fluorine.
`When mixtures such as CF4-Q2 are dissociated in an
`electrical discharge, fluorine atoms are liberated, and
`volatize the silicon as SiF4. Such processes are iso-
`tropic, i.e., they etch in all directions at the samerate.
`Anisotropic, or vertical etches in silicon are not ob-
`served when fluorine is the sole etchant.
`Forvertical (anisotropic) etches ofsilicon, the use of
`gas mixtures such as CoF¢-Cl2 is known. The C2F¢
`serves as a source of “recombinants”, such as C3. The
`recombinants suppress(lateral) etching in the horizontal
`direction (in the plane of. the wafer) by recombining
`with Cl atoms which have been adsorbed on the etched
`walls. Etching can proceed in the vertical direction
`(normal to the wafer) because ion bombardment from
`the plasma suppresses the recombination mechanism.
`Submicron polysilicon (‘‘poly”) gate patterning re-
`quires minimum etch bias and vertical sidewall profiles
`(anisotropy). In other words, the etching process should
`not undercut the mask, and the poly line should not be
`narrower at the poly-oxide interface than it is at the
`mask-poly interface. FIG. 1A illustrates “acceptable”
`polysilicon profiles. FIG. 1B illustrates an unacceptable
`profile that is “re-entrant”, or “negative”, as would
`result from the aforementioned undercutting or narrow-
`ing. FIG. 1C illustrates an unacceptable profile that is
`notched, such as would result from a lack of sidewall
`protection.
`Further, the selectivity of etch between poly and the
`underlying gate oxide (poly:oxide selectivity) must be’
`as high as possible so as to reduce oxide loss. These two
`requirements, anisotropy and poly:oxide selectivity, can
`be fulfilled with chlorine-based dry etching processes,
`as opposed to fluorine-containing plasmas that tend to
`etch isotropically and have poorselectivity of poly:ox-
`ide. Still, even with chlorine-based processes, the selec-
`tivity of poly:oxide is compromised for profile control.
`Using a typical etcher, such as the top-powered, waf-
`er-grounded LAM 490 etcher, poly:oxide selectivities
`in excess of 100:1 can be achieved with low power(100
`Watt) Clo/Heplasmas,but result in severe undercutting
`or notching of the poly sidewall (See FIGS. 1B, 1C and
`2A). On the other hand, helium-rich (greater than 50%),
`high power(greater than 200 Watts) processes produce
`vertical sidewalls at the expense of selectivity (less than
`30:1) and tend to incidentally damage the gate oxide.
`Lateral etching occurs during the overetch cycle and
`
`_ 5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Page 18 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 18 of 25
`
`
`
`3
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`5,242,536
`
`4
`tion is less than that of the HBr so that the plasma re-
`mains stable and etchingis effective.
`Additionally, in the present invention, the purpose of
`adding HBrto a Cl2/Heplasmais to be able to raise the
`selectivity of poly:oxide and/or the % overetch, with-
`out losing anisotropy.
`The patents described above do not resolve the poly-
`:oxide selectivity issue, and do not recognize the trade-
`off between selectivity and anisotropy. Neither do they
`recognize that etching tends to become moreisotropic
`during overetch, when the underlying oxide is exposed.
`(Overetching is necessary in order to ensure that no
`residues are left on the wafer. If etching was stopped at
`the “endpoint”, as determined by optical emission from
`the plasma, only parts of the wafer would be completely
`etched while other parts would still be covered with
`remaining polysilicon. This is due to the fact that both
`the initial polysilicon film thickness and the etch rate are
`not perfectly uniform.)
`DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process with improved sidewall
`profiling.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process with improved poly:oxide
`selectivity, i.c., on the order of greater than 30:1.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process with improved poly:resist
`selectivity, ic. on the order of greater than 4:1.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process with improved sidewall
`passivation.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process that operates at “reduced”
`(as opposed to “baseline” processes not employing
`HBr) plasma pressures.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process that minimizes the tradeoff
`between poly:oxide selectivity and anisotropy.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process that is amenable to a high
`degree (i.e., >60%) of overetch, without sacrificing
`anisotropy.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process that meets the performance
`targets outlined above over a wide window of the
`etcher parameter space so that the process is relatively
`insensitive to small variations of the process parameters.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process that is useful for submicron
`technologies.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process having high etch rate uni-
`formity, e.g. on the order of within +/—5%
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`polysilicon etching process capable of a high through-
`put.
`According to the invention, polysilicon etching is
`performed in a gas containing Helium (He), Hydrogen
`Bromide (HBr) and a chlorine-containing gas such as
`Cl, BCl3 or HCI. In the main hereinafter, the chlorine-
`containing gas Cl2 is discussed.
`flow (of
`The percent of He flow in the total
`He/HBr/Cl)is established at 0-30% ofthe total flow.
`The percent of HBr in the balance of the total flow
`(excluding the He) is established at 30-50%. The re-
`maining flow is Clo.
`
`US. Pat. No. 4,943,344 discloses an etching method
`using Br2 and forming a deep trench etch in single crys-
`tal silicon with photoresist mask at temperatures below
`— 100° C.
`In contrast thereto, the present invention relates to an
`anisotropic polysilicon etch for gate definition using a
`parallel plate etcher with water cooled electrodes at
`0°-90° C., preferably at approximately 20° C. Actual
`plasma neutral and ions temperature is on the order of
`300° K. (degrees Kelvin), as opposed to the electron
`temperature which is on the order of 10,000° K..,, and is
`not controlled perse.
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,799,991 discloses a process for prefer-
`entially etching polysilicon selectively to monocrystal-
`line silicon using HBr additions to noncarbonated etch-
`ants and small additions of oxygen.
`In contrast thereto, the present invention relates to
`etching polysilicon selectively to oxide using HBr addi-
`tion to noncarbonated etchants. Specifically, wafers are
`made of monocrystalline silicon with one crystalline
`orientation facing the surface, as opposed to polycrys-
`talline silicon (polysilicon) made of clusters of crystal-
`line silicon arranged in no particular order. The mono-
`crystalline substrate should not be exposed, and oxygen
`additions should be prevented by reducing air leaks.
`Leak backrate is less than 5 mTorr/min, which corre-
`spondsto less than 0.4 percent O2 by volume.
`US. Pat. No. 4,502,915 discloses a two-step plasma
`process for selective anisotropic etching of polycrystal-
`line silicon without leaving residue. In a first step, a
`poly etch nonselective to oxide or residues is performed
`with a fluorine-containing species, and about 1500 A of
`poly is removed. In a subsequentstep, a selective etch-
`ing is performed.
`In contrast thereto, in the present invention, HBr is
`suppressed in a “breakthrough”step, for native oxide
`breakthrough. Fluorine containing species (e.g., SF¢)
`are specifically avoided, and breakthrough step timeis
`limited (e.g., to approximately 5 sec. so as to preserve
`anisotropy. Typically, about 300A of poly is removed
`during this step.
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,209 discloses plasma etching
`using Hydrogen Bromide addition, wherein the bro-
`mine-chlorine mole ratio is in the range of from about
`1% to about 10%. In column2,lines 62-64 thereof,it is
`suggested that HBr can prevent lateral etching and
`increase the selectivity to SiOz.
`In the present invention, the bromine-chlorine mole
`ratio is maintained above 25% (e.g., at approximately
`34%) in order to achieve anisotropy and poly:oxide
`selectivity with reliability.
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,450,042 and 4,521,275 (continuation
`of 4,450,042) disclose plasma etch chemistry for aniso-
`tropic etching of silicon specifically employing Bro-
`mine gas (Br2) and an inert gas concentration at least
`three times that of the bromine compound.
`In U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,490,209, 4,450,042 and 4,521,275 it
`is suggested that chemistries based on chlorine have
`been considered necessary for vertical (anisotropic)
`etching of silicon, and discharges of pure Clz have been
`found useful for this purpose. However, somesilicon
`materials, such as highly doped polysilicon, maystill
`experience some undercutting if etch conditions are not
`closely controlled.
`In the present invention, HBr is employed, whichis
`easier to handle than Br2. The inert gas (He) concentra-
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`65
`
`Page 19 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 19 of 25
`
`
`
`5,242,536
`
`5
`Gas pressure is established in the range of 230-270
`mTorr, andthe total flow rateis established in the range
`of 150-200 sccm. Discharge poweris established in the
`range of 150-200 Watts, and the discharge gap is estab-
`lished in the range of 0.5-0.6 cm. Various specific “reci-
`pes” within these ranges are set forth herein.
`Further according to the invention, during overetch,
`the discharge poweris reduced by up to 50%.
`Further according to the invention,
`in an initial
`breakthrough step, preceding the “main”etch step, the
`HBr(bromineaddition)is not present. (Breakthroughis
`performed with He/Cl2 only.)
`A wafer etched according to the disclosed process,
`and the gas for etching are also disclosed.
`FIG.3 shows generally the improvements that can be
`achieved using the disclosed process (e., using HBr).
`In a chlorine-only process, shown at 302, poly:oxide
`selectivity on the order of 30:1 and poly:resist selectiv-
`ity on the orderof 1.6:1 can be achieved. Vertical profil-
`ing can be achieved with less than 50% overetch, but
`there is occasional notching. In a chlorine/helium pro-
`cess, shown at 304, low pressures and powers can be
`employed and highselectivities can be achieved. How-
`ever, the process tendsto be isotropic. As shownat 306,
`hydrogen-bromideis beneficially employed to augment
`either of these two processes, resulting in high selectivi-
`ties and vertical profiles with long overetch possible, as
`shownat 308.
`The disclosed process produces vertical sidewalls
`while achieving higher selectivity to oxide than a
`Cl2/He plasma. Further, by using HBr in the etching
`process, poly:oxide selectivity is enhanced withoutlos-
`ing anisotropy and withoutrelying on resist passivation.
`Further, by using HBr in the etching process, He con-
`tent can be reduced, selectivity can be improved, and
`better profile control can be achieved.
`The disclosed process hasutility in submicron, Poly-1
`etch technology (gate polysilicon), e.g. for etching at
`0.7 um.
`.
`Other objects, features and advantages of the inven-
`tion will become apparent in light of the following
`description thereof.
`The following terms and abbreviations are (or may
`be) used herein: polysilicon (poly); Chlorine (Cl); He-
`lium (He); Hydrogen-Bromide (HBr); milliTorr (mT, or
`mTorr); standard cubic centimeters per minute (sccm);
`centimeters (cm); Angstroms (A); microns (um); nano-
`meters (nm); degrees Celsius (°C.); degrees Kelvin
`(*K.); watts (W); kilowatts (KW); etch rate (ER); criti-
`cal dimension (CD); scanning electron microscope
`(SEM); seconds (sec); minutes (min); hours (hr); less
`than (<); greater than (>); percent (%); ratio of one
`element “X”’ to another element “Y” (X:Y).
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG.1A is a schematic representation of a cross-sec-
`tion of a polysilicon gates, exhibiting acceptable side-
`wall profile, such as may be produced with various
`prior art etching techniques, or with the etching tech-
`nique of the present invention.
`FIG.1B is a schematic representation of a cross-sec-
`tion of a polysilicon gate, exhibiting an unacceptable
`re-entrant or negative sidewall profile.
`FIG. 1C is a schematic representation of a cross-sec-
`tion of a polysilicon gate, exhibiting an unacceptable
`notched sidewall profile.
`FIG.1D is a schematic representation of profile spec-
`ifications for anisotrophy.
`
`Page 20 of 25
`
`6
`FIG. 2A is a photomicrograph showing a notched
`sidewall. (Compare FIG. 1C)
`FIG. 2B is a photomicrograph showing a vertical
`sidewall. (Compare FIG. 1A at 102)
`FIG.3 is a generalized graphic representation of the
`process and advantagesof the present invention.
`FIG.4 is a photomicrograph of an isotropic etch in
`15% HBrin a total flow of HBr and Cl.
`FIG.5 is a photomicrograph of an anisotropic etch in
`30% HBrin a total flow of HBr and Cl.
`FIGS. 6A and 6B are contour plots of poly and oxide
`etch ratesin a first test matrix.
`FIGS. 7A and 7B are contour plots of direct fit to
`poly etch rate uniformity and fit to its inverse, in the
`first test matrix.
`FIGS. 8A and 8B are plots of general trends of selec-
`tivity poly:oxide in the first test matrix.
`FIGS. 9A and 9B are contour plots of selectivity
`poly:resist in the first test matrix.
`FIGS. 10A and 10B are contour plots of calculated
`CDloss, in the first test matrix.
`‘
`FIGS. 114A and 11B are contour plots of calculated
`oxide loss in the first test matrix.
`FIGS. 12A and 12B are contour plots of poly and
`oxide etch rates, in a second test matrix.
`FIGS. 13A and 13B are contour plots of poly etch
`rate uniformity and selectivity poly:resist in the second
`test matrix.
`FIGS. 14A and 14B are contour plots of poly and
`oxide etch rates, poly uniformity and selectivity po-
`ly:resist in the second test matrix.
`FIGS. 15A and 15B are photomicrographs of poly
`profiles with 30% and 100% overetch, according to the
`present invention.
`FIGS. 16A and 16B are photomicrographs of poly
`profiles with 80 and 100 sccm Cl) flow, according to the
`present invention.
`FIGS. 17A, 17B and 17C are plots of process data
`showing capability and reproducibility of the process of
`the present invention.
`FIG. 18A, 18B and 18C are plots of remaining gate
`oxide as a function of overetch time and overetch
`power, according to the present invention.
`FIG.19 is a photomicrographof poly sidewall profile
`with resist mask, 60% overetch time, according to the
`present invention.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`According to the present invention, a dry etching
`process is disclosed for anisotropic polysilicon etching
`using HBr gas along with Cl, and He. The process
`improves profile control, improves poly:oxide and po-
`ly:resist selectivities, and indicates improvements in
`sub-micron technology.
`In the discussion that follows, results are based on
`investigations performed on the LAM 490 (Trademark)
`Etcher, available from LAM Research Corp. of Fre-
`mont, CA, but the invention is not limited to the use of
`this particular etcher. The LAM 490 etcheris a parallel
`plate etcher having 8 inch parallel anodized aluminum
`electrodes with a variable gap from 0.25 cm to 2.5 cm.
`Gases are fed through a shower-head type top elec-
`trode. The top electrode (cathode) is powered by a 1250
`Watt solid state generator. The bottom electrode (an-
`ode) is grounded. Gas flows are adjustable from 0-200
`sccm. Operating pressure is adjustable from about 100
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`30
`
`55
`
`65
`
`
`
`Page 20 of 25
`
`
`
`5,242,536
`
`7
`mTorr to 10 Torr. The etcher has automatic wafer
`transport with load-lock.
`
`Investigative Methodology
`Table I, presented below,illustrates etching perfor-
`mance ofa “baseline” process using only Clz and He,
`the “target”for the processofthis invention (using HBr
`and different etcher parameter settings), and the ‘‘rea-
`sons” for selecting the target parameters.
`Aside from selectivity (poly:resist and poly:oxide)
`and profile control, the process mustalso satisfy other
`requirements specific to the equipment used. Overall,
`the goal is not only to achieve high performances under
`optimum conditions, but to develop a process that meets
`these performance targets over a wide window ofthe
`parameter spaceso that it is insensitive to small varia-
`tions of the process parameters (pressure, power,etc.).
`Forinstance, electrode spacing should be madeas large
`as possible to reduce the effects of small gap variations.
`Another example is to operate at lower pressure. Low
`pressure processesrely less on sidewall passivation, and
`because collisions in the sheath are less likely,
`they
`enhanceion directionality.
`
`TABLEI
`
`TABLEIl-continued
`Parameter
`Range
`total flow
`60 to 570
`% helium
`0 to 70
`% HBr*
`10 to 100
`Total
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`The percent HBr (%HBr)is taken as a percentage of
`the combined flow of Clz and HBr(exclusive of the He
`flow).
`Two methodologies were investigated: 1) simply add
`HBRorreplace Cl2 by HBrin the “baseline” process; or
`2) start from “desirable” conditions as listed under “tar-
`get” in Table I. Here, ‘desirable’ conditions refer to a
`set of pressure, powervalues, etc. that is preferred from
`a process maintenance viewpoint, and based on the
`latest trends in plasma etching. A difficulty in the first
`approach(simply add HBr or replace Cl2 by HBrin the
`“baseline” process)is that the test apparatus had already
`been optimized for etch rate, uniformity, selectivity and
`profile, with chlorine and helium only. By simply add-
`ing HBr(or replacing Cl), this delicate balance would
`
`Baseline etch process and target parameters:
`Baseline
`Target
`Reason
`175
`low, 100?
`minimize damage
`increase selectivity
`profile control
`widen window
`
`Parameter
`power (Watts)
`
`pressure(mT)
`gap (cm)
`Cl2 (sccm)
`He (sccm)
`
`350
`0.46
`65
`150
`
`low, 100?
`high, 1.0?
`?
`low
`high
`
`confine plasma
`reduce loading,
`improve mix,
`enhance cooling
`but enough to enhance
`profile contro! & selectivity,
`not too much to avoid
`Tesist stripping problems
`throughput
`
`reduce oxide loss
`preserve implant mask
`
`HBr
`
`none
`
`low
`
`4000
`<t5%
`
`30:1
`<50
`
`> 3000
`<t5%
`
`> 90:1
`<20
`
`poly etch rate
`(A/min)
`uniformity*
`selectivity
`poly:oxide
`oxide loss (A)
`selectivity
`poly:resist
`CD loss
`CD uniformity
`profile
`
`high
`1.6:1
`not measurable
`NA (<0.1 pm?)
`litho limited
`1o¢ < 0.02 um
`alwaysvertical,
`occasionally
`insensitive to
`negative with
`doping level &
`POC]; poly,
`method, % overetch
`foot with
`implanted poly
`
`reduce CD loss
`litho limited
`
`device performance
`
`get upset. For example: 1) by adding 10 sccm of HBR to
`Uniformity (“U”) is determined by taking a plurality
`the baseline process, the poly:oxide selectivity was not
`of measurements per wafer, and equals 100(max-min)/-
`significantly improved, and results were not very con-
`(max+min)
`sistent; 2) by reducing the Cly flow by 10 sccm and
`Table II, presented below,illustrates the experimen-
`replacing it with 10 sccm of HBr, a non-etching plasma
`tal “grid” for studying the parameter space of the LAM
`resulted (it would seem that HBr tends not to maintain
`490 etcher. Individual operating parameters are varied
`the dischargeas efficiently as Cl2); 3) by adding 20 sccm
`within the total operating window for the etcher. (Re-
`HBrtoahigh poly:oxide selectivity process (175 Watts,
`sults are characterized using Response Surface Method-
`350 mTorr, 0.46 cm gap, 161 sccm Cl2, 54 sccm He,60:1
`ology (RSM), a mathematical method for characteriza-
`poly:oxide, less than 2:1 poly:resist), the poly:resist se-
`tion and optimization of processes based on Statistical
`lectivity improved (to 7:1), but the poly:oxide selectiv-
`Design of Experiments (SDE) and least-squarefits.)
`ity was not improved; 4) at low pressure (less than 150
`TABLEII
`mTorr) and low power(less than 150 Watts), only Heli-
`um-free discharges could be sustained, and by adding
`HBrthe plasma was often unstable; 5) at 250 mTorr, 100
`Watts, 0.46 cm gap, 115 sccm Clo, 20 sccm HBr and 20
`sccm He, etching was isotropic.
`
`Parameter
`pressure (mT)
`power(Watts)
`gap (cm)
`
`Range
`100 to 350
`100 to 300
`0.46 to 1.00
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 21 of 25
`
`
`
`Page 21 of 25
`
`
`
`9
`However, at 250 mTorr, 190 Watts, 0.5 cm gap, 100
`sccm Cla, 50 sccm HBrand 40 sccm He,etching became
`anisotropic. This region was selected for further investi-
`gation because it is comfortably within the operating
`window,butstill 100 mTorr below the baseline process
`pressure.
`it will be
`In the experimental