throbber
4,955,379
`[11] Patent Number:
`United States Patent 11)
`Hall
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`
`[54] MOTION ARTEFACT REJECTION SYSTEM
`FOR EULESS OXIMETERS
`
`_[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[75]
`
`.
`Inventor:
`
`Heicas R. Hall, Dyfed, United
`gdom
`
`[73] Assignee: National Research Development
`Corporation, London, England
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 229,692
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Aug. 8, 1988
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`[30]
`Aug. 14, 1987 [GB] United Kingdom................. 8719333
`
`Unt, CUS ceccccsscsesecsseessstssssseterrseseeseneesss AGIB 5/00
`(51)
`sesssssnsssse 128/633; 128/664;
`[52] US. Cd. cesccscessececceenee
`128/666; 128/687
`[58] Field of Search ............. 128/633, 634, 664, 665,
`128/666, 687; 356/39, 41
`
`8/1978 Bond et al. svseeseneeneraene 128/666
`4,109,643
`9/1979 Nielsen .....
`veeee 356/41
`4,167,331
`
`4/1981 Lewyn ....
`». 128/690
`4,260,951
`4,353,152 10/1982 O’Connoret al.
`". 128/666
`
`4,641,658 2/1987 Lepper........
`... 128/633
`
`". 128/633
`3/1987 Passafaro .
`4,651,741
`
`"128/633
`4,723,554 2/1988 Oman ...
`
`Primary Examiner—Kyle L. Howell
`Assistant Examiner—John C. Hanley
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Howard F. Mandelbaum
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`A pulse oximeter apparatus characterized in that it com-
`prises a bandpass filter adapted selectively to exclude
`motion artefact from wanted signal is disclosed.
`Also disclosed is the use of such an apparatus for the
`determination of pulse rate and/or arterial blood oxy-
`gen saturation.
`
`6 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`129 tap
`bandpass filter
`
`OF5-bHr
`
`red AC
`signal out
`
`
`
`129 tap
`\ewpase fer
`55 le
`
`
`ir AC
`‘signalin
`
`0001
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1048
`U.S. Patent No. 8,923,941
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1048
`U.S. Patent No. 8,923,941
`
`0001
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`
`
`US. Patent—Sep. 11, 1990 Sheet 1 of 4 4,955,379
`
`
`
`Pulse rate
`
`Frequency (Hz)
`
`(800nm channel)
`
`Fig.1
`
`Pulse rate
`
`7
`
`0
`
`Frequency (Hz)
`(1300 nm channel}
`
`Fig.2
`
`0002
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0002
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`sep. 11,1999
`
` ‘Sheet20f4
`
`4,955,379
`
`Pulse rate
`
`75
`
`5
`
`yA 0
`
`Frequency (Hz)
`
`(1300nm channel)
`
`Fig. 3
`
`
`
`after
`
`filtering
`
`before
`
`filtering
`
`time
`
`Fig.4
`
`0003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0003
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`
`
`
`red AC
`red AC
`
`
`
`129 tap
`129 tap
`
`
`
`signal in
`signal out
`lowpass filter
`bandpassfilter
`
`
`
`5.5 Hz
`0.75-Hz
`
`
`
`
`4,955,379
`
`zero
`crossing
`counter
`
`ir AC
`signal in
`
`
`
` ir AC
`
`
`129 tap
`123 tap
`signal out
`
`
`
`bandpassfilter
`lowpassfilter
`0.75-4Hz
`5.5 Hz
`
`
`
`loop filter
`{lowpass}
`
` calculate
`
`
`sample
`rate
`
`
`Fig. 5
`
`0004
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0004
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 40f4
`
`4,955,379
`
`
`
`ZHWOL
`
`seaKem4|
`
`tH]iitH
`
`ilJlpaupal
`
`J0WqvJ0
`
`Woe¢}|suawiysasngwaysis740
`
`
`
`
`JayawixoZHSLZHSL
`WOUd3WYNdd,ivag22959LxLx00089aa‘aVIAXZE48acmK
`vu0=}|Ssuolyenunwiwos
`Hq91WqZLyenp
`ce(99¥)
`9614VYVW\/
`
`
`
`puayuoJIpuajuoy}pas
`
`
`
`yeublsyeubis
`
`Jayawixowiewwo}
`
`0005
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0005
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`4,955,379
`
`MOTION ARTEFACT REJECTION SYSTEM FOR
`PULSE OXIMETERS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to a motion artefact rejection
`system for pulse oximeters; more particularly,it relates
`to a system forfiltering out signals due to patient move-
`ment, i.e. motion artefact signals, from wanted signals.
`The operation of pulse oximeters which measure
`arterial blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate is preju-
`diced when the patient performs any movement. Oxim-
`eters havedifficulty in distinguishing the pulsating sig-
`nals dueto arterial blood flow from the pulsating signals
`due to patient movement. Since the results are calcu-
`lated from this pulsatile signal and thesize thereof, it is
`highly desirable to be able to distinguish signals from
`these two sources. The present invention, which en-
`compasses an apparatus andtheuse thereof, reduces the
`severity of this problem and offers significant advan-
`tages to a clinician.
`In general terms, a pulse oximeter apparatus will
`typically comprise the following units: a sensor, con-
`taining two LEDsofdifferent wavelength (commonly
`660 nm and 940 nm), and a photodetector, which are
`applied directly to a patient. The sensor is connected to
`the main instrumentby a cable. The instrument contains
`a system to adjust LED power, hence controlling light
`intensity, and a system to analyse the incoming light
`from the photodetector. Means are provided toisolate
`the pulsatile components of these incominglightsignals.
`The nonvarying (“DC signals’) at each wavelength are
`either maintained equal by the LED poweradjusting
`system, wherebythe effects thereof cancel, or they may
`themselves be isolated and measured. The time-varying
`signals (“ACsignals”) then pass through an AGC(auto-
`matic gain control) system to ensure that they supply an
`adequate signal
`to an analogue-to-digital converter,
`where they are digitised. The AC and DCsignals are
`then taken into a microprocessor, which analyses the
`ACsignals for amplitude and frequency (corresponding
`to pulse rate). Oxygen saturation is calculated by the
`microprocessor by inserting the amplitudes of the vari-
`ous signals into the following formula:
`
`AC/DC;
`AC/DC
`
`and reading the result from an experimentally-deter-
`mined reference table. The results may be displayed on
`LEDs or LCDs. Thereis additionally provided a sys-
`tem to judge whether motion artefact is present by
`examination of variability of AC signal frequency. If
`motion is judged to be present, displayed values are
`frozen and, if this state of affairs continues for any
`length of time, a warning message is given.
`In use, the sensoris closely applied to a well-perfused
`region of a patient, such as a fingertip. Light from the
`LEDs needs to pass through a well-perfused region to
`ensure a good ACsignal is obtained. The emergentlight
`pulsates in intensity due to arterial pulsation. Since dur-
`ing systole the internal vessels are dilated, the total path
`length for the light is increased andintensity falls. Arte-
`rial blood is examined exclusively since it alone is the
`cause of the AC signals.
`Patient movement interferes with the operation of
`pulse oximeters in several ways. If either the LEDs or
`photodetectoris not fixed directly in contact with the
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`skin, their distance from it may vary slightly when the
`patient moves. By simple 1/d? function throughair,
`measured light levels may change disastrously in real-
`life situations.
`Additionally, even if the optical components are ide-
`ally fixed to the skin, the path length between them may
`changeif the tissue is slightly deformed by the move-
`ment. Again, light level changes by this mechanism may
`seriously interfere with measurements. In this case, the
`function of intensity versus distance is more compli-
`cated than 1d/2, since, as tissue is deformed,its optical
`characteristics change, This is because of the mobility
`of the blood, the major absorbing species at the wave-
`lengths in use; for instance, as the fingertip is com-
`pressed, the path length between the optical compo-
`nents will reduce, but, additionally, venous and capil-
`lary blood is squeezed out of the light path.
`Furthermore, during severe motion, one or both opti-
`cal transducers maybe pulled laterally along the tissue
`under measurement, effectively changing the measure-
`mentsite. This typically occurs when the cable connect-
`ing the sensor to the instrument is pulled and may cause
`major optical disturbance.
`Since the AC signal is typically only 2-5% of the
`amplitude of the DC signal, it is this which is propor-
`tionally most seriously affected by movementartefact.
`Considering this, it is a reasonable approximation to
`apply a filtering algorithm to the AC signals and to
`ignore errors in the DCsignals.
`Surprisingly,
`it has now been discovered that the
`wanted AC signals, otherwise known as plethysmo-
`graph waveforms, have typical frequency versus power
`spectra as illustrated in accompanying FIG. 1. Thatis,
`about 90% of their energy is contained at the fundamen-
`tal frequency (the pulse rate) with relatively little har-
`monic energy. Additionally,
`the unwanted signal
`caused by motion artefact frequently lies outside the
`frequency band ofthe pulse rate. Accompanying FIGS.
`2 and 3 illustrate the frequency versus power spectra of
`signals with which motion artefacts, random and peri-
`odie, respectively, are interfering. It follows from these
`realisations that a bandpass filter may be adapted selec-
`tively to exclude motion artefact from wanted signals.
`Accompanying FIG.4 illustrates the effectiveness of
`the present system in the removal of unwanted motion
`artefact signals from wanted plethysmographsignals.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In a first embodiment, the present inventionrelates to
`a pulse oximeter apparatus characterised in that it com-
`prises a bandpass filter adapted selectively to exclude
`motion artefact from wanted signal.
`In order to achieve this, the filter must initially be
`tuned to the pulse rate. Moreover, as the pulse rate
`changes, the filter is so-adapted that its pass-band will
`follow the frequency change.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG.1 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals found in the environment of the preferred em-
`bodiment of the invention.
`FIG.2 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals with random motion artefacts found in the envi-
`ronment of the preferred embodimentof the invention.
`FIG.3 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals with periodic motion artefacts foundin the envi-
`ronmentof the preferred embodiment of the invention.
`
`0006
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0006
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`4,955,379
`
`FIG.4 is a graphical view of plethylsmographic sig-
`nals demonstrating the effectiveness of the preferred
`embodimentof the invention.
`FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram view of the
`preferred embodimentof the invention.
`FIG.6 is a schematic block diagram view of appara-
`tus comprising an environment for the preferred em-
`bodiment of the invention.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
`
`As mentioned above, a motion artefact detector sys-
`tem decides by examination of the variability of the
`amplitude and frequency of the incoming ACsignals
`whether motion artefact is present. If artefact is not
`judged present, the bandpass filter is tuned to the pulse
`rate as determined by the normal oximeter algorithms.
`Additionaly, the AGC system adjusts the input signal
`levels to the bandpass filter such that there is a large
`overload margin, for example x16, above the incoming
`wanted AC signals. When artefactis present, the AGC
`system is frozen, fixing the gain level, and the bandpass
`filter is configured in a feedback loop as illustrated in
`accompanying FIG. 5. The output of the bandpass fil-
`ters is substantially sinusoidal and so a simple frequency
`detector, for example a zero crossing counter,is suitable
`to determine its output frequency. The outputofthis
`frequency detector passes through a low-pass loopfil-
`ter, whose output in turn directly turns the bandpass
`filter. The system thus formed is a frequency-locked
`loop or trackingfilter.
`Thus, when motion artefact is present, the bandpass
`filters can stay tuned to the pulse rate,
`tracking its
`change. Thefilters selectively exclude motion artefact
`during operation and the amplitude of the AC signals
`emergent from the filters may be used by the oximeter
`as normal. The errors in oxygen saturation measure-
`ments, as well as pulse rate, caused by patient move-
`ment are thus advantageously reduced.
`For purposes of exemplification, the present system
`has been incorporated into a Novametrix oximeter
`model 500 as an additional 68000-10 slave processor. A
`hardware block diagram is illustrated in accompanying
`FIG.6.
`Regarding digital signal processing algorithms, the
`present system is illustrated in accompanying FIG.5.
`ACsignals are first passed through a high grade 5.5 Hz
`lowpass filter, 129 tap FIR filter, which is a necessary
`anti-aliasingfilter at the lowest bandpass filter sampling
`rates, The lowpass filter samplingrate is fixed at 100 Hz.
`The bandpass filter has fixed coefficients, and is tuned
`by varying its sample rate as illustrated in accompany-
`ing FIG. 5. Finite impulse response (FIR)filters have
`been used for their predictable frequency versus delay
`characteristics. The design ofthis filter is the result of a
`number of conflicting requirements which are outlined
`below:
`(i) optimal artefact filtering demands a narrow pass-
`band and high stop-band rejection,
`implying long
`tap-length filters;
`(ii) adequate tracking of changes in pulse rate demands
`a wide pass-band and fast servo loop performance,
`implying short tap-length filters.
`Onesuitablefilter is a 129 tap FIR of sampling rate
`15-80 Hz, with —3 dB points +16% of centre fre-
`quencyand stopband rejection of —40 dB at +50% of
`centre frequency.
`I claim:
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`65
`
`4
`1. In a pulse oximeter for making a measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation which produces pulsatile sig-
`nals in response to a patient’s pulsating arterial blood
`flow in a first variable range of frequencies and motion
`artefact signals at frequencies outside of said first vari-
`able range of frequencies, apparatus for minimizing the
`effect of said motion artefact signals on said measure-
`ment of blood oxygen saturation comprising
`a tunable bandpass filter having an input to which
`said pulsatile signals and said motion artefact sig-
`nals are applied;
`a frequency determining means connected to the
`output of said tunable bandpass filter for determin-
`ing the frequency of the pulsatile signals at the
`output of said tunable bandpass filter;
`and a tuning means operatively connected to said
`frequency determining means and said tunable
`bandpass filter for tuning said tunable bandpass
`filter in response to said determined frequency to
`align the pass band of said band pass filter with the
`determined frequency of said pulsatile signals
`whereby motion artefact signals are attenuated.
`2. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising
`a first low pass filter connected to the input of said
`tunable bandpass filter.
`3. Apparatus accordingto claim 1 further comprising
`a loop filter connected between said frequency deter-
`mining means and said tuning means.
`4. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said band
`pass filter is a digital pass filter tunable by changing its
`sampling rate, and said tuning means comprises means
`for changing said sampling rate in accordance with the
`output of said frequency determining means.
`5. Apparatus according to claim 6 wherein said fre-
`quency determining means comprises a zero crossing
`counter.
`6. In a pulse oximeter for making a measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation havinga first channel wherein
`there are produced first pulsatile signals in response to
`red light absorbed by a patient’s pulsating arterial blood
`flow and a second channel wherein there are produced
`second pulsatile signals in response to infrared light
`absorbed bya patient’s pulsating arterial blood flow in a
`first variable range of frequencies, and in which motion
`artefact signals at frequencies outside of said first vari-
`able range of frequencies are produced in said first and
`second channels, apparatus for minimizing the effect of
`said motion artefact signals on said measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation comprising
`a first tunable bandpass filter disposed in said first
`channel and having an input to which said first
`pulsatile signals and said first channel motion
`artefact signals are applied;
`a second tunable bandpass filter disposed in said sec-
`ond channel and having an input to which said
`second pulsatile signals and said second channel
`motion artefact signals are applied;
`a frequency determining means connected to the
`output of at least one of said first and second tun-
`able bandpass filters for determining the frequency
`of the pulsatile signals at the outputofsaid atleast.
`one tunable bandpass filter;
`and a tuning means operatively connected to said
`frequency determining means and said first and
`second tunable bandpass filters for tuning said tun-
`able bandpass filters to align the pass bands of the
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`band pass filters with the determined frequency.
`
`0007
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0007
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

`

`sshHH
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO.
`
`: 4,955,379
`
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S)
`
`: Sep. li, 1990
`: Peter R. Hall
`
`it is certified that error appears in the above—identified patent and that said Letters Patent
`is hereby corrected as shown below:
`At
`column 1,
`line 11, change "iqs2m to cet
`
`At column 4,
`
`line 39, after "digital" insert --band--.
`
`
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Eleventh Day of February, 1992
`
`Altest:
`
`HARRY F. MANBECK, JR.
`
`
`
`:
`
`Artesting Officer
`
`Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks —_
`
`
`
`0008
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`0008
`
`FITBIT, Ex. 1048
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket