throbber
IPR Page 1/3
`
`Santen/Asahi Glass Exhibit 2011
`Micro Labs v. Santen Pharm. and Asahi Glass
`IPR2017-01434
`
`

`

`Fig. 1. Mean change in IOP of 18 patients versus time.
`PGF2M (200 pg) 7 treated eyes: points; placebo—treated
`eyes: circles; i1 SD: bars
`

`.
`Flg. 2. IOP difference between the PG—treated and
`the placebo-treated eye in each of 18 patients
`versus time. Points represent the IOP differences in
`each patient
`
`Fig. 3. Mean change in pupillary
`diameter of 18 patients versus time.
`PGFZa (200 pg) 7 treated eyes:
`points; placebo-treated eyes: circles;
`-_l-1 SD: bars
`
`140
`
`E)I
`
`E E
`
`(L
`9
`
`’5,
`
`IE
`
`U
`5 +2
`f,
`Q.
`E
`
`‘5
`5‘ ~2
`‘L
`
`S ,4
`
`,5
`
`~8
`
`5
`
`4
`
`E
`E
`
`E3
`
`E
`: 3
`5
`3 2
`i
`
`H Prostaglandin F20
`O--O Placebo
`
`
`
`
`,1
`o
`1
`2
`4
`7
`1o
`alter
`treatment
`
`Hours
`
`;_1
`24
`
`a
`
`19
`
`17
`
`15
`
`13
`
`11
`
`9
`
`7
`
`4 8
`
`+6
`
`w 4
`
`o
`
`o u o
`u o
`on o m
`on u .0 on
`o “a m ..
`
`o
`
`an.
`
`on
`no
`000
`
`o
`
`O
`
`..
`
`0
`0
`no...
`
`m
`mo.
`
`I
`
`....
`
`00000
`no
`
`on
`0
`
`o
`
`..
`
`on.
`00000
`0000
`
`u
`
`mo no 0
`o
`00
`
`o
`
`no
`on
`o
`
`0
`
`0
`
`—1
`0
`1
`2
`4
`7
`10
`
`;_|
`24
`
`Hours
`
`alter
`
`treatment
`
`0—. Prostaglandm F2a
`O--O Placebo
`
`
`
`
`,1
`o
`1
`2
`4
`7
`1o
`after
`
`treatment
`
`Hours
`
`,__‘
`24
`
`Discussion
`
`This study indicates that topical PGs can reduce IOP in
`humans. In nonglaucomatous subjects 200 ug of PGFZa re-
`duces IOP up to about 30% of pretreatment values and
`produces some hypotension for 24 h at least.
`Zajacs et a1. (1976) has found an IOP reduction in preg-
`
`nant women after intravenous or intrauterine administra—
`tion of PGs to induce abortions. Although ocular hyperten-
`sion induced by exogenous PG in humans has not been
`reported before now a similar effect has been shown in
`experimental animals. In the rabbit, Camras et a1. (1977)
`have observed that topical PGFZM and PGE2 produce an
`immediate rise in the IOP, followed by a reduction that
`
`IPR Page 2/3
`
`IPR Page 2/3
`
`

`

`141
`
`lasts many hours. The initial hypertensive response did not
`occur with the use of 5 pg or less of PGFZa. A similar
`biphasic response has been shown by Stern and Bito (1982)
`in the cat and in the rhesus monkey. The higher doses of
`PGFZu produced an initial rise in IOP before the hypotony,
`without aqueous flare. Miosis occurred in the cat eye but
`not in the monkey eye. In our patients no change in the
`pupillary diameter or the blood-aqueous barrier permeabili-
`ty was evoked by PGFZQ, Which is similar to the results
`obtained by Stern and Bite (1982) in the rhesus monkey.
`The ocular hypotensive effect of the PGs may be due to
`an increase in the aqueous—humor outflow facility, which
`Green and Kim (1975) and Moses et al. (1981) have demon-
`strated in the rabbit eye.
`Since PGs reduce IOP and do not change the pupillary
`diameter and blood—aqueous barrier, they could represent
`a new pharmacological approach to the therapy of ocular
`hypertensions. However, a serious handicap in their use
`is the unfavorable side effects of ocular pain, conjunctival
`hyperemia and headache, which could discourage their use
`in Chronic therapy.
`
`Camras CB, Bito LZ (1981) Reduction of intraocular pressure in
`normal and glaucomatous primate (Aotus trivirgatus) eyes by
`topically applied prostaglandin F21. Curr Eye Res 12205—209
`Camras CB, Bito LZ, Eakins KE (1977) Reduction of intraocular
`pressure by prostaglandins applied topically t0 the eyes of con-
`scious rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16: 1125‘1134
`Eakins KE (1977) Prostaglandin and non-prostaglandin mediated
`breakdown of the blood aqueous barrier. Exp Eye Res [Suppl]
`25:483~498
`Green K, Kim K (1975) Pattern of ocular response to topical and
`systemic prostaglandin. Invest Ophthalmol 14: 36-40
`Moses RA, Parkison G, Snower DP (1981) Prostaglandin E2 effect
`on the facility of outflow in the rabbit eye. Ann Ophthalmol
`1327217723
`Starr MS (1971) Further studies on the effect of prostaglandin
`on intraocular pressure in the rabbit. Exp Eye Res 11 :1707177
`Stern FA, Bito LZ (1982) Comparison of the hypotensive and
`other ocular effects of prostaglandins E2 and F21 on cat and
`rhesus monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 22: 5887598
`Waitzman MB, King CD (1967) Prostaglandin influences on in»
`traocular pressure and pupil size. Am J Physiol 212: 3297334
`Zajacs M, Torok M, Mocscry P (1976) Effect on human eye of
`prostaglandin and a prostaglandin analogue used to induce
`abortion. IRCS Med Sci 4:31fl321
`
`References
`
`Beitch BR, Eakins KE (1969) The effects of prostaglandins on
`the intraocular pressure of
`the rabbit. Br
`J Pharmacol
`37:158—167
`
`Received July 30, 1984
`
`IPR Page 3/3
`
`IPR Page 3/3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket