`IPR2017-01430
`
`
`DOCKET NO.: 2211726-00145
`Filed on behalf of Unified Patents Inc.
`By: David L. Cavanaugh, Reg. No. 36,476
`Daniel V. Williams, Reg. No. 45,221
`Matthew J. Leary, Reg. No. 58,593
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 663-6000
`Email: david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`
`Roshan Mansinghani, Reg. No. 62,429
`Jonathan Stroud, Reg. No. 72,518
`Unified Patents Inc.
`1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 10
`Washington, DC, 20009
`Tel: (202) 805-8931
`Email: roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`Email: jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________________________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________________________________
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`PLECTRUM LLC
`Patent Owner
`IPR2017-01430
`Patent 5,978,951
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2017-01430
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s November 14, 2017 Scheduling Order (Paper 9),
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on
`
`August 2, 2018. Petitioner requests the ability to use a computer, projector, and
`
`screen to display possible demonstratives and exhibits.
`
`Pursuant to 37 § C.F.R. 42.70, Petitioner specifies the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
` Issues related to the Board’s Decision on Institution and the grounds
`
`instituted in the Decision.
`
` Issues related to the Board’s Decision on Petitioner’s Request for
`
`Rehearing.
`
` Whether claims 1, 2, and 21 are unpatentable for obviousness under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103 over Cheriton.
`
` Whether claims 3, 5, and 6 are unpatentable for obviousness under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103 over Cheriton and Kessler.
`
` Whether claims 4 and 22-24 are unpatentable for obviousness under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103 over Cheriton, Kessler and Jain.
`
` Whether claims 8 and 11-14 are unpatentable for obviousness under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103 over Cheriton and Jain.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2017-01430
`
` Reply to any arguments raised in the Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response and Patent Owner’s Response.
`
` Response to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument.
`
` Present on and respond to any issues raised in briefing pursuant to the
`
`schedule.
`
` Issues related to the Board’s decision to refuse to allow Petitioner to
`
`enter additional evidence in Petitioner’s Supplemental Reply after the
`
`decision in SAS Inst., Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348, 1358 (2018). Paper
`
`No. 17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2017-01430
`
`No fee is believed due with this request, however, the Director is hereby
`
`authorized to charge any shortfall or credit any overpayment to the Deposit Account
`
`08-0219.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 13, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Matthew J. Leary/
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Registration No. 36,476
`
`Roshan Mansinghani
`Registration No. 62,429
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Registration No. 72,518
`
`Daniel V. Williams
`Registration No. 45,221
`
`Matthew J. Leary
`Registration No. 58,593
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2017-01430
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on June 13, 2018, I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing materials:
`
` Petition’s Request for Oral Argument
`to be served via email on the following correspondent of record as listed on PAIR:
`
`
`Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson LLP
`4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450
`Houston, TX 77006
`(713) 581-3000
`Emails: zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`larry@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`/Matthew J. Leary/
`Matthew J. Leary
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
