throbber
said-sound and said pointer—triggered communication message and said graphicrandwheiein
`
`and further comprising a human communication sound
`
`gig text or ascii.
`
`31. (currently amended) The method of claim 1. wherein the steps of
`
`arbitratingsending and receiving are is carried out with one of said communications comprising
`
`said video; a_nd said graphic; fl said pointer-triggerfl messagerand—wherein-some-oi-said
`
`and further comprising text or ascii.
`
`32. (currentiy amended) The method of ciaim 1, wherein the step_s_ of
`
`arbitratng sending and receiving are is carried out with one of said communications comprising
`
`said graphic and said pointer-triggerfi semmunisatisn messageraHd—WhereiH-seme-oi-said
`
`and forther comprising text or ascii.
`
`33. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-somewhat said pointer-triggered communication message,
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer andwherein—said—step
`
`communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`computers
`
`@ 3
`
`4. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said pointer-triggerpg communication message and said graphic,
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer and-wherein—said—step
`
`to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5001
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5001
`
`

`

`communicate test or ascii to the other of the participator computers
`
`35. (currently amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said—eeund—and said video and said graphic. and further including
`
`the step of arbitrating with the controller computer
`
`arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human
`
`communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator computers
`
`36. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 1?0. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with eaid—seund—and said graphic and said pointer-triggered message,
`
` and further including
`
`the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator
`
`computers can communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the other of
`
`the participator computers
`
`37. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic and said videopand-whereirssaid-step-ef-arbitrating
`
`includes-arbitratng and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to
`
`determine which of the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the
`
`participator computers
`
`38. (currently amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said graphic and said pointer-triggered message,
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller
`
`computer to determine which of the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5002
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5002
`
`

`

`other of the participator computers
`
`39. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said pointer-triggered message,
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator computers
`
`and further including the step of
`
`40. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 1?0. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said graphic and said pointer-triggered
`
`communication message.
`
`41. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein-salesmpr
`
`
`
`elm-{Faring isWW‘ '
`
`further includin the ste of arbitratin with the
`
`controller computer to determine which of the particip'ator computers can communicate a
`
`human communication sound.
`
`42. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-seend-aed said video, and further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate a human communication sound.
`
`43. (currentlyr amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with widowed-and said graphic, and further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`10
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5003
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5003
`
`

`

`communicate a human communication sound.
`
`44. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-sound-and said pointer-triggered communication message
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of
`
`the participator computers can communicate a human communication sound.
`
`45. (currently amended) The method of claim 170. further including the step of
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers
`
`46. (previously amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video.
`
`47. (previously amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said graphic.
`
`48. (previoust amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video and said pointer-triggered communication message.
`
`49. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said video.
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of
`
`the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`11
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5004
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5004
`
`

`

`computers
`
`50. (previouslyr amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic.
`
`51. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic and said pointer—triggered communication message.
`
`52. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said graphic.
`
`arbitsatieg and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine
`
`which of the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers
`
`53. (currently amended) The method of claim 1?0. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saidseund—and said video and said graphicI and further including
`
`the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the participator
`
`computers can communicate a human communication sound.
`
`54. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170 3. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with saidseund—and said video and said pointer-triggered
`
`eer-nnsueieatien message, and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller
`
`computer to determine which of the participator computers can commonicate a human
`
`communication sound.
`
`12
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5005
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5005
`
`

`

`55. (currently amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with esteemed-and said video,—and—wherein—said—stepei—arbitrating
`
`and further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to
`
`determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human communication
`
`sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator computers
`
`56. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-seend—ahd said video and said graphic and said pointer-
`
`triggered communication message and further including the step of arbitrating with the
`
`controller computer to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a
`
`human communication sound.
`
`5?. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-seaweed said video and said pointer-triggered
`
`communication message,
`
`and further
`
`including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the
`
`participator computers can communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the
`
`other of the participator computers
`
`58. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-sound-ane said video and said graphic and said pointer-
`
`triggered communication message.
`
`a_n_q
`
`further including the step of arbitrating with the controller computer to determine which of the
`
`participator computers can communicate a human communication sound and text or ascii to the
`
`other of the participator computers
`
`13
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5006
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5006
`
`

`

`59. (currently amended) The method of claim 1m. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said—soundand said graphic and said pointer-triggered message
`
`and further comprising a human communication sound
`
`50. (currently amended) The method of claim 170. wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried outwith said pointer-triggered message
`
`and wherein said
`
`step of arbitrating includes arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can
`
`communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator computers
`
`61. (currently amended) The method of claim 1?0, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating
`
`includes arbitrating to determine which of
`
`the participator computers can communicate text or ascii to the other of the participator
`
`computers
`
`62. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim no, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said pointer-triggered eemmenieation message.
`
`63. (currently amended) The method of claim 1m, wherein said step of
`
`arbitrating is carried out with said-sound-and fl graphic, and wherein said step of arbitrating
`
`includes arbitrating to determine which of the participator computers can communicate a human
`
`communication sound and text or ascii to the other of the participator computers
`
`64. (previously amended) The method of claim 1, further including the step of:
`
`determining a users age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`14
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5007
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5007
`
`

`

`65. (previously amended) The method of claim 2, further including the step of".
`
`determining a usefs age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`66. (previously amended)
`
`The method of claim 3. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`67. (previously amended) The method of claim 4. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`68. (previously amended) The method of claim 5. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`69. (previously amended)
`
`The method of claim 6. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity‘
`
`70. (previously amended) The method of claim 7. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`71. (previously amended) The method of claim 8. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`T2. (previously amended)
`
`The method of claim 9, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`15
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5008
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5008
`
`

`

`73. (previously amended) The method of claim 10, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`74. (previously amended) The method of claim 11. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`75. (previously amended) The method of claim 12. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user’s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`T6. (previously amended) The method of claim 13, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`7?. (previously amended) The method of claim 14. further including the step-of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`78. (previously amended) The method of claim 15. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`79. (previously amended) The method of claim 16, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`80. (previoust amended) The method of claim 17, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`16
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5009
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5009
`
`

`

`31. (previously amended) The method of claim 18. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`82. (previously amended) The method of claim 19. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`83. (previously amended) The method of claim 20, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`84. (previously amended) The method of claim 21, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`85. (previously amended) The method of claim 22, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`86. (previously amended) The method of claim 23, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`87. (previously amended) The method of claim 24. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`88. (previously amended) The method of claim 25. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity,
`
`89. (previously amended) The method of claim 26. further including the step of:
`
`1?
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5010
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5010
`
`

`

`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`90. (previously amended) The method of claim 27. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user’s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`91. (previously amended) The method of claim 28. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`92. (previously amended) The method of claim 29, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`93. (previously amended) The method of claim 30, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`94. (previously amended) The method of claim 31‘ further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`95. (previously amended} The method of claim 32. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`96. (previoust amended} The method of claim 33. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`9?. (previously amended) The method of claim 34, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`18
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5011
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5011
`
`

`

`98. (previoust amended) The method of claim 35. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`99. (previously amended) The method of claim 36. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`100. (previously amended) The method of claim 37, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`101. (previously amended) The method of claim 38. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age correSponding to said user identity.
`
`102. (previously amended) The method of claim 39, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`103. (previously amended) The method of claim 40, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`104. (previoust amended) The method of claim 41, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`105. (previously amended) The method of claim 42. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`19
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5012
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5012
`
`

`

`106. (previously amended) The method of claim 43. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user Identity.
`
`107. (previoust amended) The method of ciaim 44, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`108. (previously amended) The method of claim 45. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`109. (previously amended) The method of claim 45. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`110. (previoust amended) The method of claim 4?. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`111. (previously amended) The method of claim 48, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`112. (previously amended) The method of ciaim 49. further inciuding the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`113. (previoust amended) The method of claim 50. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`114. (previoust amended) The method of claim 51. further including the step of:
`
`20
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5013
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5013
`
`

`

`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`115. (previously amended) The method of claim 52, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`116. (previously amended) The method of claim 53. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`11?. (previously amended) The method of claim 54. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`118. (previously amended) The method of claim 55, forther including the step of:
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`119. (previously amended) The method of claim 56. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`120. (previously amended) The method of claim 57, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`121. (previously amended) The method of claim 58, further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`122. (previoust amended) The method of claim 59. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`21
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5014
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5014
`
`

`

`123. (previcuusly amended) The method of claim 60. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`124. (previously amended) The method of claim 61. fUrther including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`125. (previously amended) The method of claim 62. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user’s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`126. (previously amended) The method of claim 63. further including the step of:
`
`y
`
`determining a user‘s age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`12?. (currently amended) The method of claim 1, wherein the step of arbitrating
`
`includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`128. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 2, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`129. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 3. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`130. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 4. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`22
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5015
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5015
`
`

`

`1131. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 5. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`132. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 6. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`133. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 7. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`134. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 8. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`135. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 9, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`136. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 10, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`137. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 11. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`138. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 12. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`139. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 13. wherein the step of
`
`23
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5016
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5016
`
`

`

`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`140. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 14, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`141. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 15, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`142. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 16. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`143. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim .17. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`144. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 18. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating inciudes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`145. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 19. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`146. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 20. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`14?. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 21, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`24
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5017
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5017
`
`

`

`14B. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 22, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`149. (currentlyr amended)
`
`The method of claim 23. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`150. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 24, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`151. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 25, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`152. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 26, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`153. (currently amended) The method of claim 2?. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`154. (currently amended) The method of claim 28, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`155. (currently amended) The method of claim 29, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`25
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5018
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5018
`
`

`

`156. (currently amended) The method of claim 30. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communicatiOns.
`
`15?. (currently amended) The method of claim 31. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`158. (currently amended) The method of claim 32. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes authorizing a moderator for said communications.
`
`159. (currently amended) The method of claim 170, wherein further including
`
`the stepof communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`160. (currently amended) The method of claim 41. wherein further including the
`
`stepof communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`161. (currently amended) The method of claim 42. wherein further including the
`
`step of
`
`communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`162. (currently amended) The method of claim 46, wherein further including the
`
`step of
`
`communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`26
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5019
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5019
`
`

`

`163. (currently amended) The method of claim 61. wherein further including the
`
`stepof communicating a user image from said one of the plurality of the
`
`participator computers to the other of the participator computers.
`
`164. (currently amended) The method of claim 1. further including the step of;
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member
`
`in the group.
`
`165. (currently amended) A method tor g_f using a computer system to distribute
`
`communication over an internet network. the method including the steps ot:
`
`obtaining a respective authenticated user identity from a controller computer over
`
`the Internet network for respective use on each of a plurality of participator computers. each
`
`said participator computer connected to an input device and to an output device;
`
`programming the participator computers to enable the communication. including
`
`at least one of a human sound. a video. a graphic* or multimedia a—eembinatien—thereot;
`
`connecting said participator computers to said Internet network;
`
`using said authenticated user identityr to communicate a pointer-triggered
`
`message from one of said participator computers to said controller computer and from said
`
`controller computer to an other of said participator computers; and
`
`using said pointer-triggered message to receive the communication at the other
`
`of said participator computers in real time over the Internet network.
`
`166. (currently amended) The method of claim 165. further including the step of:
`
`determining a user's age corresponding to said user identity.
`
`2?
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5020
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5020
`
`

`

`16?. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 165. wherein the step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including _s__a_ig_ video.
`
`168. (currently amended)
`
`The method of claim 166. wherein the step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including gig video.
`
`189. (previously amended) The method of claim 165. further including the step
`
`of forming a chat channel over the Internet network. and arbitrating channel communications
`
`between said participator computers at said controller computer.
`
`17'0. (currently amended) A method for gf using computers to communicate over
`
`an lntemet network, the method including the steps of;
`
`connecting sheet a controller computer with a plurality of participator computers;
`
`said connecting including connecting at ieast one of the plurality of garticigator comguters with
`
`a he controller computer through the Internet network. each said participator computer
`
`connected to an input device and to an output device; and
`
`arbitrating with the controller computer. in accordance with predefined rules
`
`including a test for an authenticated user identity-appfied—te—said—ene—of—the—phasality—ef
`
`partisipater—eomputers, to determine which of the participator computers can communicate to
`
`an other of the participator computers over the Internet network in real timeTh-Hman-GGHHQT _a_t
`
`least one of a video. a graphic. g a pointer-triggered messagerer—a-eembinatienthereef.
`
`1H (previously amended) The method of claim 165, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound.
`
`23
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5021
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5021
`
`

`

`172. (previoust amended)
`
`The method of claim 165, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound and said video.
`
`173. (previoust amended) The method of claim 166, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound.
`
`174. (previously amended) The method of claim 166, wherein said step of
`
`programming is carried out with said communication including said sound and said video-
`
`175. (currently amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step of
`
`sending the communication as an out of band communication.
`
`176. (previoust amended) The method of claim 166. further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`177. (previously amended) The method of claim 165, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`17B. (previously amended) The method of claim 170. further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`179. (previously amended) The method of claim 5. further including the step of:
`
`29
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5022
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5022
`
`

`

`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`180. (previously amended) The method of claim 6. further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`181. (previously amended) The method of claim 10, further including the step of:
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`182. (currently amended) The method of claim 23. further including the step of
`
`communicating a user image from one member in the group to another member in
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`the group.
`
`183. (previously added) The method of claim 1, further including the step of:
`
`communicating an asynchronous communication from said controller computer to
`
`one of said participator computers.
`
`184.
`
`(previously added)
`
`The method of claim 1, wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity. group, and
`
`content.
`
`185.
`
`(previoust added)
`
`The method of claim 2. wherein the step of
`
`arbitrating includes censoring responsive to at least one of said user identity. group, and
`
`30
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5023
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation, Ex. 1002, p. 5023
`
`

`

`content.
`
`186.
`
`(previously added)
`
`The method of claim

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket