`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 1285100-0002
`Petitioner: VIZIO, Inc.
`
`
`
`§§§§§§§
`
`United States Patent No.: 8,309,375
`Inventors: Yoshinori Shimizu, et al.
`Formerly Application No.: 12/942,792
`Issue Date: Nov. 13, 2012
`Filing Date: Nov. 9, 2010
`Former Group Art Unit: 2812
`Former Examiner: A. Mustapha
`
`
`For: LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Post Office Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. PAUL R. PRUCNAL
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF
`UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,309,375
`
`
`
`
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
`
`BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS ................................................. 2
`
`
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`III.
`
`PRIORITY DATE AND ONE OF ORDINARY SKILL ............................. 10
`
`IV. MATERIALS RELIED UPON ..................................................................... 11
`
`V.
`
`BACKGROUND ON THE STATE OF THE ART ...................................... 11
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Color, Chromaticity, and CIE Chromaticity Curve ............................ 11
`
`Development of White Light LEDs .................................................... 19
`
`Cerium-Activated Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) Phosphor ....... 21
`
`VI. ANALYSIS OF THE ’375 PATENT ............................................................ 24
`
`A. Overview of the ’375 Patent ................................................................ 24
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Overview of the ’375 Patent Prosecution History .............................. 29
`
`Claim Construction of the ’375 Patent Claims ................................... 30
`
`VII. OVERVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART REFERENCES ................................... 31
`
`A. Overview of U.S. Patent No. 6,600,175 (“Baretz”) ............................ 31
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Overview of U.S. Patent No. 3,699,478 (“Pinnow”) .......................... 37
`
`Overview of S. Nakamura et al., “High-Power InGaN Single-
`Quantum-Well-Structure Blue And Violet Light-Emitting Diodes”
`(“Nakamura”) ...................................................................................... 38
`
`D. Overview of U.S. Patent 4,024,070 (“Schuil”) ................................... 40
`
`VIII. THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE INVALID ......................................... 42
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Legal Standards ................................................................................... 42
`
`Claims 1 and 4 are Obvious by Baretz in view of Pinnow ................. 46
`i
`
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`Claim 1 ...................................................................................... 47
`
`1.
`
`a. Preamble: “A method for manufacturing a light emitting
`device comprising:” ............................................................. 47
`
`b. Element [1.A.1]: “preparing a light emitting component
`having an active layer of a semiconductor ” ....................... 48
`
`c. Element [1.A.2]: “said active layer comprising a gallium
`nitride based semiconductor containing indium and being
`capable of emitting a blue color light having a spectrum
`with a peak wavelength within the range from 420 to 490
`nm;” ..................................................................................... 52
`
`d. Element [1.B.1]: “preparing a phosphor capable of
`absorbing a part of the blue color light emitted from said
`light emitting component and emitting a yellow color light
`having a broad emission spectrum comprising a peak
`wavelength existing around the range from 510 to 600 nm
`and a tail continuing beyond 700 nm” ................................. 53
`
`e. Element [1.B.2]: “wherein selection of said phosphor is
`controlled based on an emission wavelength of said light
`emitting component; and” .................................................... 74
`
`f. Element [1.C.1]: “combining said light emitting component
`and said phosphor so that the blue color light from said light
`emitting component and the yellow color light from said
`phosphor are mixed to make a white color light” ............... 75
`
`g. Element [1.C.2]: “wherein a chromaticity point of the white
`color light is on a straight line connecting a point of
`chromaticity of the blue color light and a point of
`chromaticity of the yellow color light, and” ........................ 84
`
`h. Element [1.D]: “wherein a content of said phosphor in said
`light emitting device is selected to obtain a desired
`chromaticity of the white color light” .................................. 92
`
`i. Baretz in view of Pinnow discloses “preparing” a light
`emitting component and phosphor....................................... 93
`
`ii
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`Claim 4 ...................................................................................... 99
`
`2.
`
`C.
`
`Claims 1 and 4 are Obvious by Baretz in view of Pinnow, and further
`in view of Nakamura and Schuil .......................................................100
`
`1.
`
`Claim 1 ....................................................................................100
`
`a. Preamble: “A method for manufacturing a light emitting
`device comprising:” ...........................................................100
`
`b. Element [1.A.1]: “preparing a light emitting component
`having an active layer of a semiconductor ” .....................101
`
`c. Element [1.A.2]: “said active layer comprising a gallium
`nitride based semiconductor containing indium and being
`capable of emitting a blue color light having a spectrum
`with a peak wavelength within the range from 420 to 490
`nm;” ...................................................................................103
`
`d. Element [1.B.1]: “preparing a phosphor capable of
`absorbing a part of the blue color light emitted from said
`light emitting component and emitting a yellow color light
`having a broad emission spectrum comprising a peak
`wavelength existing around the range from 510 to 600 nm
`and a tail continuing beyond 700 nm” ...............................104
`
`e. Element [1.B.2]: “wherein selection of said phosphor is
`controlled based on an emission wavelength of said light
`emitting component; and” ..................................................106
`
`f. Element [1.C.1]: “combining said light emitting component
`and said phosphor so that the blue color light from said light
`emitting component and the yellow color light from said
`phosphor are mixed to make a white color light” .............106
`
`g. Element [1.C.2]: “wherein a chromaticity point of the white
`color light is on a straight line connecting a point of
`chromaticity of the blue color light and a point of
`chromaticity of the yellow color light, and” ......................107
`
`iii
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`h. Element [1.D]: “wherein a content of said phosphor in said
`light emitting device is selected to obtain a desired
`chromaticity of the white color light” ................................107
`
`i. Reasons to combine Baretz, Pinnow, Nakamura, and Schuil
` 107
`
`2.
`
`Claim 4 ....................................................................................112
`
`IX. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................112
`
`
`APPENDIX A (Curriculum Vitae)
`APPENDIX B (List of Materials Considered)
`
`iv
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`
`I, Dr. Paul R. Prucnal, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`1.
`
`I have been retained to provide assistance regarding U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,309,375 (EX10011) (which I refer to as “the ’375 patent”). Specifically, I have
`
`been asked to consider the validity of claims 1 and 4 of the ’375 patent (the
`
`“Challenged Claims”). I have personal knowledge of the facts and opinions set
`
`forth in this declaration, and, if called upon to do so, I would testify competently
`
`thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I am being compensated for my time at my standard consulting rate of
`
`$650 per hour. I am also being reimbursed for expenses that I incur during the
`
`course of this work. My compensation is not contingent upon the results of my
`
`study, the substance of my opinions, or the outcome of any proceeding involving
`
`the Challenged Claims. I have no financial interest in the outcome of this matter or
`
`in the pending litigation between Petitioner, VIZIO, Inc. (“VIZIO”) and Nichia
`
`Corporation.
`
`3.
`
`A table of contents and a list of exhibits referenced herein are
`
`included above.
`
`
`1 The citations in this Declaration to an “Exhibit” or “EX” refer to the Exhibits to
`
`
`
`the Petition.
`
`
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`II. BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS
`4.
`I offer statements and opinions on behalf of VIZIO, generally
`
`regarding the validity, novelty, prior art, obviousness considerations, and
`
`understanding of a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSITA”) as it relates to the
`
`’375 patent. Attached hereto as Appendix A, is a true and correct copy of my
`
`Curriculum Vitae describing my background and experience.
`
`5.
`
`I am currently a Professor of Electrical Engineering at Princeton
`
`University in Princeton, New Jersey. I graduated summa cum laude from Bowdoin
`
`College in 1974 with an A.B. in Mathematics and Physics. I graduated from
`
`Columbia University in 1976 with a M.S. in Electrical Engineering. I went on to
`
`receive an M.Phil. in Electrical Engineering from Columbia University in 1978 and
`
`a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Columbia University in 1979. The title of
`
`my dissertation was “Threshold Detection in Optical Communications and Visual
`
`Psychophysics,” which dealt with the detection of photons by both semiconductor
`
`detectors and the human visual system.
`
`6.
`
`Upon graduation from Columbia in 1979, I joined Columbia
`
`University as an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering, and in 1984 I was
`
`promoted to Associate Professor. My teaching at Columbia included courses on
`
`semiconductor light emitters, light emitting diodes (LEDs), lasers and
`
`optoelectronic devices. My research at Columbia included studying frequency
`
`
`
`2
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`modulation of semiconductor lasers and LEDs, as well as semiconductor
`
`modulators comprised of multiple quantum wells. My research at Columbia
`
`further included photonic switching and computing architectures using backlit
`
`LCD arrays to implement vector-matrix multiplication and packet routing.
`
`7.
`
`In 1988, I joined the faculty of Princeton University as an Associate
`
`Professor of Electrical Engineering. In 1990, I was promoted to Professor of
`
`Electrical Engineering at Princeton.
`
`8. My teaching at Princeton includes courses at the undergraduate and
`
`graduate level on photonic devices including semiconductor light emitters, light
`
`emitting diodes, and lasers, and optical signal processing techniques that include
`
`wavelength conversion.
`
`9. My professional activities include attending and presenting papers at
`
`optics conferences such as the annual meetings of the Lasers and Electooptics
`
`Society, the Optical Society of America, the Society of Photooptical
`
`Instrumentation Engineers, the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, and
`
`Optical Fiber Communications. My activities also include regularly reading and
`
`publishing papers in scholarly optics journals, including Photonics Technology
`
`Letters, the Journal of the Optical Society of America, the Optical Engineering
`
`journal, Optics Letters, and others.
`
`
`
`3
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`10. My research on photonic systems at Princeton has included the
`
`design, fabrication and testing of solid state sources of radiation, including
`
`semiconductor light emitters, light emitting diodes and lasers. Such light emitters
`
`included titanium sapphire ring lasers, multiple quantum well semiconductor
`
`optical amplifiers, III-V semiconductor distributed feedback lasers, and III-V
`
`photonic integrated circuits including LEDs. In addition to the light emitters listed
`
`above, I also have worked with semiconductor fiber ring lasers, and erbium doped
`
`fiber lasers.
`
`11. My research at Princeton has also included the investigation of
`
`photonic packet switching architectures, including two-dimensional back-lit LCD
`
`arrays, and experiments on wavelength conversion, such as using Mach Zehnder
`
`and Sagnac interferometers, color center lasers pumped by Nd:YAG lasers,
`
`wavelength conversion experiments using four wave mixing in highly germanium
`
`doped fibers, bismuth doped fibers, periodically poled lithium niobate, and optical
`
`spectral broadening using supercontiuum generation with dispersion decreasing
`
`fiber.
`
`12. From 1989 through 1991, I was a founding director of the New Jersey
`
`Advanced Technology Center for Photonics and Optoelectronic Materials. My
`
`responsibilities there included leading a $10 million research program involving
`
`approximately thirty faculty members. Research in this center included photonic
`
`
`
`4
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`technology such as semiconductor and organic light emitting diodes for
`
`communications, computing, and displays.
`
`13.
`
`In 1991, I was a visiting professor in the Research Center for
`
`Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Tokyo, where I held the
`
`NEC Chair. My responsibilities there included research and teaching on photonics.
`
`14.
`
`In 1992, I was a visiting professor at the University of Parma. My
`
`responsibilities there included researching and teaching photonics.
`
`15. During my career at Princeton, I received numerous awards and
`
`recognitions, including: (a) being elected a Fellow of the IEEE and a Fellow of the
`
`Optical Society of America; (b) receiving the Rudolf Kingslake Medal and Prize
`
`from the SPIE for the most noteworthy original paper in Optical Engineering; (c)
`
`receiving the Gold Medal Award from the Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and
`
`Informatics at the Comenius University for leadership in the field of Optics; (d)
`
`receiving the Princeton University Graduate Mentoring Award; (e) receiving
`
`numerous Engineering Council Awards; (f) receiving the Walter Curtis Johnson
`
`Prize for Excellence in Teaching; (g) receiving the Princeton School of
`
`Engineering and Applied Science Distinguished Teacher Award; and (h) The
`
`President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching, Princeton University (2015).
`
`
`
`5
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`In addition to the activities, education, and professional experience
`
`16.
`
`listed above, I have been involved in several projects outside of academics that
`
`contribute to my expertise relating to this declaration.
`
`17.
`
`In 1979-1981, I worked with Phillips Laboratories on a project that
`
`involved research on bandwidth compaction coding for optical data storage. My
`
`responsibilities included the design and analysis of efficient data encoding schemes
`
`for optical recording using laser technology. The designed recording disks
`
`included an epoxy layer to protect the reflective information layer of the disk.
`
`18.
`
`In 1982, I worked with Optical Information Systems, Inc. on a project
`
`that involved optical transceiver design for fiber optic links. My responsibilities
`
`included the design of optical transmitters including semiconductor laser diodes for
`
`high-speed optical data transmission.
`
`19.
`
`In 1983-1984, I worked with GTE Labs on a project that involved
`
`performance analysis of fiber optic transmission systems. My responsibilities
`
`included the investigation of high performance modulation formats for optical
`
`transmitters based on semiconductor lasers.
`
`20.
`
`In 1985-1986, I worked with AT&T Bell Laboratories on a project
`
`that involved research on multiplexing techniques for fiber optic networks. My
`
`responsibilities included investigating wavelength-based multiplexing.
`
`
`
`6
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`In 1987-1988, I worked with IBM on a project that involved research
`
`21.
`
`on multiple access techniques for fiber optic networks. My responsibilities
`
`included design and performance analysis of wavelength-division multiplexed
`
`networks and wavelength conversion.
`
`22.
`
`In 1987-1989, I worked with Dove Electronics on a project that
`
`involved research on photonic switching technology and architectures. My
`
`responsibilities included the design and analysis of packet switching architectures,
`
`including wavelength switching using wavelength conversion.
`
`23.
`
`In 1992-1995, I worked with Siemens Corporate Research on a
`
`project that involved research on ultrafast optical switching technology. My
`
`responsibilities included the investigation of optoelectronic technologies including
`
`semiconductor light emitters.
`
`24.
`
`In 1998-2001, I worked with Sun Microsystems on a project which
`
`involved research on optical backplanes and computer interconnects. My
`
`responsibilities included the design of a high performance multiprocessor
`
`interconnection system using semiconductor light emitters and integrated
`
`optoelectronic modulators.
`
`25.
`
`In 1999-2000, I worked with SAIC on a project that involved research
`
`on fiber optic network architectures. My responsibilities included the investigation
`
`
`
`7
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`of novel switching and multiplexing techniques that included wavelength
`
`conversion.
`
`26.
`
`In 1999-2002, I worked with Multi Link Technologies, Inc. on a
`
`project that involved fiber optic transceiver design and optoelectronic technology.
`
`My responsibilities included the design and analysis of high-speed optical multi-
`
`wavelength transmitters and receivers for WDM networks.
`
`27.
`
`In 2000-2002, I worked with Ultra Fast Optical Systems on a project
`
`that involved research and development of all-optical wavelength conversion based
`
`on semiconductor optical amplifiers and tunable semiconductor lasers.
`
`28.
`
`In 2000-2003, I was a member of the advisory board on optical
`
`network technology for Alphion, Inc. My responsibilities included providing
`
`guidance on the development of technology in the optical networks space.
`
`29.
`
`In 2003-2006, I worked with Kailight Photonics Inc. on a project
`
`which involved research and development of all-optical regenerators based on
`
`semiconductor optical amplifiers. My responsibilities included the design and
`
`testing of optoelectronic technology.
`
`30.
`
`In 2004-2011, I worked with NEC Laboratories on a project that
`
`involved research on physical layer security in optical networks. My
`
`responsibilities included the design and analysis of spectral spreading techniques
`
`for privacy using optical steganography.
`
`
`
`8
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`In 2005-2006, I worked with Princeton Optronics on a project that
`
`31.
`
`involved the design of fiber optic networks for avionics platform. My
`
`responsibilities included designing and implementing a multi-wavelength fiber
`
`optic CDMA network.
`
`32.
`
`In 2010, I worked with Access Optical Networks, Inc. on a project
`
`that involved research and development on optical data storage, including gallium
`
`nitride lasers, iron-doped lithium niobate crystals, liquid crystal spatial light
`
`modulators, and including epoxy resin for embedding microoptic components. As
`
`part of this design project, I investigated using spatial light modulators, including
`
`back-lit LCD arrays, as a two-dimensional data modulator to write information into
`
`an optical memory cell.
`
`33. From 1996-present, I have been a member of the advisory board on
`
`advanced computing research for the Center for Computing Sciences. My
`
`responsibilities include providing feedback on the Center’s research program.
`
`34. From 2010-present, I have worked with Bascom Hunter Technologies
`
`on a project that has involved research and development on RF photonics. My
`
`responsibilities include developing novel systems for RF interference cancellation
`
`based on integrated semiconductor photonic components.
`
`35.
`
`I have also published a book on optical CDMA and 32 book chapters
`
`in the optics field. In addition, I have published approximately 350 papers in
`
`
`
`9
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`conference proceedings and over 290 peer reviewed journal papers. My book,
`
`“Neuromorphic Photonics,” will be published in December of 2016. I have also
`
`chaired or served as a member on several dozen boards and committees related to
`
`optics and electrical engineering.
`
`III. PRIORITY DATE AND ONE OF ORDINARY SKILL
`36.
`I understand that the factors considered in determining the level of a
`
`POSITA include the level of education and experience of persons working in the
`
`field; the types of problems encountered in the field; and the sophistication of the
`
`technology at the time of the purported invention, which I understand is asserted to
`
`be based on numerous foreign patent applications filed between July 29, 1996 and
`
`March 31, 1997. I understand that a POSITA is not a specific real individual, but
`
`rather is a hypothetical individual having the qualities reflected by the factors
`
`above. I understand that a POSITA would also have knowledge of the teachings of
`
`the prior art, including the art cited below.
`
`37.
`
`In my opinion, on or before July 29, 1996, a POSITA relating to the
`
`technology of the ’375 patent would have had a minimum of a bachelor’s degree in
`
`electrical engineering, chemistry, or physics, or a related field, and approximately
`
`two years of professional experience with optoelectronics, or other relevant
`
`experience. Additional graduate education could substitute for professional
`
`experience, or significant experience in the field could substitute for formal
`
`
`
`10
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`education. A POSITA is presumed to have knowledge of all relevant prior art, and
`
`therefore would have been familiar with each of the references cited herein, as well
`
`as the background knowledge in the art discussed in Section V, and the full range
`
`of teachings they contain.
`
`38. Well before July 29, 1996, my level of skill in the art was at least that
`
`of a POSITA. I am qualified to provide opinions concerning what a POSITA
`
`would have known and understood at that time, and my analysis and conclusions in
`
`this declaration are from the perspective of a POSITA as of July 29, 1996.
`
`IV. MATERIALS RELIED UPON
`39.
`In reaching the conclusions described in this declaration, I have relied
`
`on the documents and materials cited in this declaration as well as those identified
`
`in Appendix B to this declaration. Each of these materials is a type of document
`
`that experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their opinions.
`
`40. My opinions are also based on my education, training, research,
`
`knowledge, and personal and professional experience.
`
`V. BACKGROUND ON THE STATE OF THE ART
`A. Color, Chromaticity, and CIE Chromaticity Curve
`41.
`It is well understood that colors can be represented by a mixture of
`
`three primary colors, blue-violet, green, and orange-red. See H. Rossotti, Color,
`
`Princeton University Press (1983) (EX1007) (which I refer to as “Rossotti”) at
`
`pp.153-154 (“[a]s early as 1855, Maxwell found that a great number of colours
`11
`
`
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`could be produced by mixing lights of only the three ‘primary’ colours: orange-red,
`
`green and blue-violet.”). In other words, by mixing any of the three primary
`
`colors, any other color visible to the human eye can be created. See M. Luckiesh,
`
`“Color and its Applications,” D. Van Nostrand Co., The Plimpton Press (1921)
`
`(EX1016) (which I refer to as “Luckiesh”) pp. 57-58 (“Long ago it was
`
`demonstrated that, by proper mixtures of the three well-chosen primary colors, any
`
`color can be matched.”). For example, “[i]t is seen that red added to green
`
`produces yellow,” and “yellow and blue mixed by addition produce white.”
`
`EX1016[Luckiesh] p. 58. For the latter example, yellow and blue are considered
`
`to be “complementary” because their mixture results in white light. See
`
`EX1016[Luckiesh] p. 59. Other complementary colors are depicted by the color
`
`wheel reproduced below, which I have modified to show the corresponding colors.
`
`See EX1016[Luckiesh] p. 59, TABLE IV.
`
`
`
`12
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`
`
`
`(EX1016[Luckiesh] Figure 22, modified.)
`
`42. As shown above in FIG. 22, complementary colors are located
`
`opposite one another within the color wheel (i.e. yellow, labeled “Y,” is opposite
`
`violet, labeled “V.”). Notably, while the color wheel uses the label “V” denoting
`
`violet as being the complementary to yellow, Luckiesh explains that “[s]ome prefer
`
`to use the term ‘violet’ instead of ‘blue’” when referring to the three primary
`
`colors, but notes that “[b]lue, however, appears satisfactory and is a safer term than
`
`violet, because there are a great many who apply the term violet to purples.” See
`
`EX1016[Luckiesh] pp. 57-58.
`
`
`
`13
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`43. Maxwell’s Triangle, reproduced below, also shows how colors can be
`
`represented by a mixture of the three primary colors, blue-violet, green, and
`
`orange-red, which form the three vertices of the triangle. See EX1007[Rossotti] p.
`
`153.
`
`
`
`(EX1007[Rossotti] Figure 66, annotated.)
`
`44. As Rossotti teaches, by mixing colors “[t]he colour resulting from a
`
`particular mixture can be represented by a point on a triangular grid (see Figure
`
`66).” EX1007[Rossotti] p. 154. For example, a mixture of green and orange-red
`
`will result in yellow and a mixture of blue-violet and orange-red will result in
`
`magenta. As I have annotated above in Figure 66 of Rossotti, white light
`
`
`
`14
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`corresponds to a point along the line connecting blue-violet light and yellow light,
`
`and as such, Maxwell’s triangle similarly tells us that a mixture of blue light and
`
`yellow light will result in white light. See EX1007[Rossotti] p. 153.
`
`45.
`
`In 1993, the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE)
`
`standards body created the CIE Chromaticity curve, reproduced below, which
`
`provides an objective specification of color as observed by a standard observer
`
`using three standard primary light sources. See EX1007[Rossotti] p. 155-57.
`
`Specifically, the CIE chromaticity curve allows the chromaticity of all visible
`
`colors to be presented as a point within the curve or “tongue”, where “[t]he inner
`
`triangle encloses those colours obtainable by mixing real primaries 436 nm, 546
`
`nm, 700 nm (i.e. those enclosed in Maxwell’s triangle of Figure 66, page 153),”
`
`above. EX1007[Rossotti] p. 156.
`
`
`
`15
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`
`(EX1007[Rossotti] Figure 68.)
`
`
`
`46. The “usefulness of the CIE diagrams arises from the fact that we can
`
`represent a mixture of two lights as a point on the line joining the points which
`
`specify them.” EX1007[Rossotti] p. 157. Varying the concentration of the two
`
`lights causes the position of the point (i.e. the mixture) to vary along the straight
`
`
`
`16
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`line connecting the two lights. EX1007[Rossotti] p. 157-158. For example, as
`
`shown in Figure 69, reproduced below, purple light is represented as a point “X”
`
`on a line between the red color and violet color on the CIE chromaticity curve.
`
`Because the purple light is formed by mixing two parts red light (770 nm) and one
`
`part violet light (380 nm), the point “X” is located “twice as near to the red point
`
`as to the violet point.” EX1007[Rossotti] p. 158 (emphasis in original).
`
`(EX1007[Rossotti] Figure 69.)
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`47. Thus, CIE diagrams allows us to “predict the result of mixing
`
`coloured lights and to locate complementary colours.” See EX1007[Rossotti] p.
`
`160-61. As shown in Figure 71, below, a light of 470 nm (approximately bluish in
`
`color) and a light of 570 nm (approximately yellowish in color) can mix to form a
`
`a white light because the point “E” lies on a line connecting those two colors. See
`
`EX1007[Rossotti] p. 161-62. The point “E” shown in the middle of the CIE
`
`Chromaticity diagram in Figure 71 illustrates what is known as “equal energy
`
`white” or “pure white,” which reflects an “equal mixture of the three primaries.”
`
`See EX1007[Rossotti] p. 158. However, to a normal observer, the region generally
`
`surrounding the point “E” would also be considered white.
`
`
`
`18
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`
`(EX1007[Rossotti] Figure 71.)
`
`B. Development of White Light LEDs
`48. LEDs emitting a white-color light were well-known prior to the
`
`
`
`asserted priority date of the ’375 patent. See e.g. U.S. Patent No. 6,600,175 to
`
`Baretz et al. (EX1004) (which I refer to as “Baretz”) at Abstract. As explained by
`
`Baretz, the development of white-color LEDs was driven by “the desirability of
`
`white light displays (e.g., commercial bank ‘time and temperature’ message
`
`
`
`19
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`boards, stadium scoreboards),” (EX1004[Baretz] 2:25-26) in conjunction with the
`
`“emerging trend in the manufacturing and marketing of informational displays or
`
`signage, especially for outdoor usage, [] to utilize solid state LED lamps as
`
`replacement for more conventional incandescent bulbs” which had “lower power
`
`consumption costs and the longer operational lifetime (hence, reducing
`
`maintenance costs).” EX1004[Baretz] 2:15-21.
`
`49.
`
`In the “Background of the Invention” section of Baretz, Baretz
`
`describes a number of other different approaches taken in the prior art to develop a
`
`white light LED, such as packaging “a minimum of three LED dies (or chips)-one
`
`red, one green and one blue, encapsulated in a single epoxy package” so that when
`
`the emitted colors mix, white light is produced (2:47-53), and applying a layer of
`
`luminescent material (such as phosphors and/or fluorescers) next to the active or
`
`light-emitting region of an LED so that “one can change the phosphor in the
`
`luminescing layer, and thereby change the color of the whole material” (5:45-
`
`6:34). However, these approaches had their shortcomings. See EX1004[Baretz]
`
`2:51-58.
`
`50. Baretz explains further that his “invention is based on the discovery
`
`that a highly efficient white light emitting device may be simply and economically
`
`fabricated utilizing a solid state light emitting device for generating a shorter
`
`wavelength radiation which is transmitted to a luminophor (fluorescent and/or
`
`
`
`20
`
`VIZIO 1002
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`United States Patent No. 8,309,375
`phosphorescent solid material) for down conversion by the luminophor of the
`
`radiation from the solid state light emitting device, to yield white light.”
`
`EX1004[Baretz] 8:18-25. For example, “[w]hite light LED solid state devices may
`
`be made by the method of the present invention, utilizing a down conversion
`
`process whereby the primary photon generated in the active region of the diode is
`
`down converted with primary blue emission and/or secondary blue fluorescent or
`
`phosphorescent centers, as well as green and red fluorescent or phosphorescent
`
`centers.” EX1004[Baretz] 8:26-36. “Such a device for white light emission, based
`
`on down-conversion, requires the primary light to be either blue or ultraviolet
`
`emission, such as is available using blue or ultraviolet LED dies and lamps.”
`
`EX1004[Baretz] 8:36-39.
`
`51.
`
`I explain the white light LED of Baretz in greater detail in Sections
`