throbber
CLOSED CAPTIONING WITH THE LINE 21 SYSTEM
`
`Sharon Earley
`
`NATIONAL CAPTIONING INSTITUTE, INC.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Closed captioning has enabled the hear(cid:173)
`ing impaired to enjoy television more fully
`over the past three years. Although over(cid:173)
`the-air broadcasters have provided the bulk
`of closed-captioned programs, the partici(cid:173)
`pation of the cable industry is both grow(cid:173)
`ing and promising. The Line 21 system, with
`its proven transmission and reception
`strengths, is an ideally suited caption
`delivery system for cablecasters. The Line
`21 signal passes intact over satellite and
`cable. It can be recorded in three-quarter
`and half-inch formats, and no special ac(cid:173)
`commodations are required to retransmit it.
`Decoding devices, specifically designed for
`cable, are currently available, as is a
`system which enables a local operator to
`caption its own prograrrming in a cost(cid:173)
`effective manner. The National Captioning
`Institute sees the full participation of
`cablecasters in the provision of closed
`captions as an important step in increas(cid:173)
`ing the access of the hearing impaired to
`television programming.
`
`CLOSED-CAPTION SERVICE
`
`For the past three decades, television
`has been a primary medium of communica(cid:173)
`tion for most Americans. It has become our
`major source of information about the world
`and our principal source of entertainment.
`But for many years, television's voice
`remained distorted, muted or totally
`silent for some 16 million Americans with
`impaired hearing. The situation changed
`in March, 1980, when the Public Broad(cid:173)
`casting Service and the ABC and NBC
`television networks began broadcasting 16
`hours of predominantly prime-time program(cid:173)
`ming with closed captions produced by the
`National Captioning Institute, Inc.
`(NCI).
`
`Closed captioning involves represent(cid:173)
`ing the sound track of television programs
`in subtitles which are telecast as data in
`the vertical blanking interval and are
`visible only to those viewers whose sets
`are equipped with special decoding devices.
`While in theory closed captions can be
`provided by any teletext system, only one,
`currently known as the Line 21 system, is
`actually in use and delivering captions
`
`nationally. At present, 300,000 viewers
`across ~he country who use Line 21 Tele(cid:173)
`Captio~decoding devices enjoy over 40
`hours per week of predominantly prime-time
`network programming. More than 200 major
`advertisers caption their commercials and
`support the costs of captioning television
`specials and series.
`
`Although the closed-caption service
`began three years ago primarily as a
`broadcast network service, it has expanded
`into many other delivery systems -(cid:173)
`satellite syndication, videocassette,
`videodisk, local broadcast and cable.
`
`DEVELOPMENTS IN CABLE
`
`The cable industry's first involve(cid:173)
`ment in closed captioning was the delivery
`of closed-captioned network programs to
`subscribers. Since 1982, however, cable
`support and involvement in the closed(cid:173)
`caption service has been active and
`growing rapidly.
`
`In early 1982 Showtime became the
`first subscription service to offer its
`own closed-captioned programming -- the
`BIZARRE series. Shortly thereafter Show(cid:173)
`time added selected movies to its closed(cid:173)
`captioned fare. In mid 1982 Colormax Elec(cid:173)
`tronic Corporation began production of two
`closed-caption decoding devices designed
`specifically for the cable audience -- a
`combination converter/Line 21 decoder, and
`a Line 21 decoder module that attaches to
`a cable converter. Such units and the
`standard Sears (Sanyo) TeleCaption decoder
`are being acquired by operators such as
`Tampa Cable Television and American Cable
`Systems, whose specific commitments to
`provide closed-caption decoders were made
`in their franchise bids.
`
`Cable subscribers can now obtaln news
`and features of special interest to the
`hearing impaired via the KEYFAX National
`Teletext Magazine, a service provided co(cid:173)
`operatively by NCI and KEYCOM Electronics
`Publishing. Most recently, Tribune Cable
`Communications, lnc., has agreed to pro(cid:173)
`vide funds to closed caption one movie
`every month for hearing-impaired sub(cid:173)
`scribers. The first movie captioned under
`
`180
`
`1
`
`SAMSUNG 1030
`
`

`
`this arrangement is POLTERGEIST, to appear
`on Showtime in June, 1983. Other MSO's are
`currently considering similar underwriting
`arrangements to provide closed-caption
`services for the benefit of their hearing(cid:173)
`impaired subscribers.
`
`While such activities generate
`enormous good will and demonstrate the
`cable industry's commitment to serve all
`facets of its market, they also make good
`business sense. NCI research indicates
`that while currently only 38% of all
`decoder households subscribe to cable
`television, 82% would subscribe to basic
`cable services if closed-captioned cable
`services were available. Under those
`circumstances, 68% would subscribe to
`pay cable compared to the 28% who currently
`do so. Further, of those who do not own a
`closed-caption decoder, approximately 78%
`would rent one from a cable company.
`
`CLOSED-CAPTION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
`
`The Line 21 system was designed
`specifically to provide closed captions to
`the hearing impaired. For this reason,
`fundamental to its specifications was
`that it require little investment in
`effort and hardware by the telecaster,
`that it be sufficiently rugged to pass un(cid:173)
`modified through all television media, and
`that it be inexpensive for the consumer to
`access.
`
`Development of the Line 21 closed(cid:173)
`captioning system was conducted by the PES
`Engineering Department with funds provided
`by the U.S. Department of Health, Educa(cid:173)
`tion and Welfare (HEW) . This work com(cid:173)
`menced in 1973 and was largely completed in
`1979. The PES task had three major compo(cid:173)
`nents, each of which had to be completed
`successfully before a closed-captioning
`service could be implemented.
`
`The first task was to evaluate the
`technique of closed captioning as a mean(cid:173)
`ingful service for the hearing impaired. To
`measure this, PBS established an experi(cid:173)
`mental closed-captioning capability and
`conducted controlled testing with the
`hearing-impaired community during 1974.
`PBS obtained the cooperation of 12 member
`stations across the country who demon(cid:173)
`strated closed-captioned television pro(cid:173)
`grams to the hearing-impaired viewers and
`had them complete over 1,400 opinion forms.
`Gallaudet College, the world's foremost
`educational institution for the hearing
`impaired, analyzed the completed question(cid:173)
`naires. The major findings were that 90%
`of the audience said they could not have
`understood the TV programs shown to them
`had they not been captioned and 95%
`said they would purchase special equipment
`to receive closed captions.
`
`During this same period and on into
`1975. PBS was studyinq the various techni-
`cal hurdles it faced in developing an
`approach to closed-captioned television.
`By November, 1975, sufficient work had
`been completed for PBS to file a petition
`with the Federal Communications Commission
`(FCC) requesting the allocation of Line 21
`for the introduction of a closed-captioned
`service. In December, 1976, the FCC ap(cid:173)
`proved such an allocation. With the FCC
`approval obtained, PBS began fabrication
`of the caption editing console which en(cid:173)
`ables caption preparation to be completed
`efficiently, secured agreements from manu(cid:173)
`facturers to produce the encoder which
`lays the Line 21 data stream into the
`vertical interval and the first consumer
`decoders -- a integrated 19" color
`television set and the add-on decoder -(cid:173)
`which Sears Roebuck agreed to retail.
`Finally, the question of who would perform
`the actual captioning service was answered
`when the non-profit and private National
`Captioning Institute was incorporated
`in early 1979.
`
`CAPTION CREATION AND ENCODING
`
`NCI creates captions in three differ(cid:173)
`ent ways, depending upon the nature of
`the program to be captioned. A recent ad(cid:173)
`vance in caption creation technology
`known as real-time captioning enables vir(cid:173)
`tually every program type to be closed
`captioned. The three methods employed by
`NCI to caption, and a method available to
`local program suppliers, are described
`below.
`
`Prerecorded Programming. NCI receives
`a time-coded videocassette dub of the pro(cid:173)
`gram master and, if available, a script of
`the program. A caption editor works with
`the program in short sections, and corn(cid:173)
`poses each caption. The editor determines
`the caption content, its location on the
`screen, and the times at which it will
`appear and disappear. All of this data is
`entered onto an 8" floppy disk via the
`caption editing console, which has word
`processing capability to facilitate the
`process. Once all captions for a program
`have been prepared and entered, they are
`played back over video and checked for
`accuracy and quality.
`
`The captions on disk are transferred
`to Line 21, Field 1 of the standard NTSC
`video signal in the encoding process. To
`encode captions a Simple Encoder, com(cid:173)
`prised basically of a microprocessor, a
`time code reader and a floppy disk reader,
`is utilized. Required inputs are SMPTE
`time code and program video from the
`master videotape. The microprocessor syn(cid:173)
`chronizes the serial caption data with the
`time code and requests additional captions
`
`181
`
`2
`
`

`
`from the disk reader when the encoder
`memory buffer is near depletion. The cap(cid:173)
`tion data is inserted into Line 21 of the
`video.
`
`TAPE ENCODING
`
`Producer
`
`r-
`ENCODING J
`'
`FACILITY I
`I
`I
`I
`1
`I
`I Master
`I Video-
`1
`Master
`I
`Tape
`tape
`Audio
`L..: ___ __ ___ _ __ _ _J
`
`Prescripted Live Programs. Presiden(cid:173)
`tial addresses and other programs which
`are broadcast live are often accurately
`prescripted. With the cooperation of the
`White House or producer, NCI obtains
`the script in advance of broadcast. With(cid:173)
`out the benefit of video or audio, the
`editor must break the text into captions.
`These captions are entered onto the disk
`without preset display and erase times.
`As the live event occurs, the caption
`editor manually recalls the captions from
`the disk for display in sync with the
`audio.
`
`Due to the nature of these programs,
`encoding must be done "live." The hard(cid:173)
`ware which enables live encoding is a
`Smart Encoder. This device is resident at
`the program origination point and is cap(cid:173)
`able of inserting caption data on Line 21
`of the video being fed through ~t. NCI
`transmits the captions to the Smart En(cid:173)
`coder at 1200 baud rate, asynchronously,
`over standard unconditioned telephone
`lines.
`
`LIVE ENCODING
`
`Advance
`Script
`
`Live
`Pro-
`
`Caption
`Editing
`Console
`
`-----,
`
`NCI
`
`I
`I
`
`TV
`
`Live
`Display
`
`I
`.J
`
`r
`I
`I
`J
`L _TB_A!;i.Sl'-'l!S.§.I.Ql-JJ:A.£IIJU - J
`
`Video
`
`I
`
`Live News and Events. For news and
`other programs, scripts are not available
`to NCI in advance of broadcast. Until last
`year, such programs were uncaptionable. In
`October, 1982, however, NCI began to ern(cid:173)
`ploy its real-time captioning system on a
`daily basis to caption ABC-TV's WORLD NEWS
`TONIGHT. The system has been employed to
`caption space shuttle launches and the
`Academy Awards.
`
`The trick to real-time captioning is
`that captions must not only be transmitted
`live, they must be created instantaneously.
`To accomplish this, NCI has borrowed and
`modified a technology employed by court
`reporters to speed the translation of
`machine shorthand to standard English.
`Stenographic translation is the computer(cid:173)
`ized translation into real words and names
`of a stenotypist's machine shorthand
`"strokes" which are a phonetic representa(cid:173)
`tion of what the stenotypist hears.
`
`NCI uses a stenographic translation
`system developed by Translation Systems,
`Inc., modified by TSI and NCI and known
`as InstaText. The heart of InstaText is
`its dictionary system, which translates
`the stenotypist's strokes into real English.
`The main dictionary is called the "univer(cid:173)
`sal" dictionary. This contains the many
`thousands of words in common usage. The
`universal dictionary is the permanent
`facet of the dictionary system, though up(cid:173)
`dated and revised from time to time. Next
`is the "personal" dictionary peculiar to
`the individual stenotypist which contains
`special abbreviations, used only by him or
`her. The third dictionary to which the
`computer will turn to "look up" a word is
`
`182
`
`3
`
`

`
`the "dope sheet," which contains entries
`appropriate to a specific task, such as
`the names and places likely to be mention(cid:173)
`ed in a given newscast.
`
`In making translations, the computer
`checks each of these dictionaries and
`matches the stenographic outline entered
`on the stenotype machine with the
`corresponding English word or words. A
`skilled stenotypist will achieve accurate
`translation on better than 97% of all
`entries.
`
`As translation takes place, the text
`is formatted into captions according to
`parameters which can be set either by the
`stenotypist or by an NCI editor operating
`the main computer keyboard. These para(cid:173)
`meters can be set in real time so that
`each line or word can be treated different(cid:173)
`ly, include line length, indentation,
`upper or upper/lower case, and line justi(cid:173)
`fication for left, right, or center dis(cid:173)
`play and display rate.
`
`The text must be then transmitted to
`a display system. In the case of NCI,
`that system is a Line 21 decoder via the
`Line 21 Smart Encoder as described above.
`
`Local Programming. Although NCI has
`and will continue to caption programs
`for local markets, a very cost-effective
`system is available to local stations and
`cablecasters with which to caption pro(cid:173)
`gramming they produce. This system util(cid:173)
`izes a Beston Llectronic Data-Prompter
`and an EEG Smart Encoder. The Data-Promp(cid:173)
`ter is an electronic word processor which
`has a character-generated output that
`can be fed directly to a standard prompter
`monitor. As the text is being presented
`to the talent, it can also be sent to the
`Line 21 Smart Encoder, enabling closed
`captions to be transmitted simultaneously
`with the program.
`
`KCMO-TV, the CBS affiliate in Kansas
`City, is currently utilizing this system
`to provide closed captions for its local
`newscasts and many cable systems are
`showing ihterest in the system for use
`with their local access programs.
`
`DATA-PROMPTER CAPTIONING
`
`Talent
`
`BEl
`Data-
`
`editing terminals
`
`Remote
`Speed
`Control
`
`LINE 21 TRANSHISSION AND RECORDING
`
`Once Line 21 closed captions are in(cid:173)
`serted into video they require no special
`accommodation by the broadcaster or cable(cid:173)
`caster. All that is required is that video
`facilities be checked to insure that they
`are passing Line 21, Field 1 intact. The
`ease of retransmission is due to the rela(cid:173)
`tively low data rate of the Line 21 signal
`which makes it very rugged.
`
`The Line 21 waveform conforms to the
`standard Television Synchronizing Waveform
`for Color Transmission given in Subpart E,
`Part 73 of the FCC Rules and Regulations.
`The composite data signal contained within
`the active video portion of the line
`period carries a clock run-in (data syn(cid:173)
`chronizing signal), and a start bit,
`followed by 16 data bits. The instanta(cid:173)
`neous data rate is thirty-two times hori(cid:173)
`zontal line scanning frequency (32FH) for
`a nominal value of 0.5 mb/s. After allow(cid:173)
`ance for the duty cycle of the Line 21
`signal, and start bits, an average data
`transmission rate of 480 bits per second
`is obtained which translates into 60
`characters (7 bit ASCll + 1 parity bit)
`per second.
`
`Just as Line 21 closed captions pass
`without difficulty over existing trans(cid:173)
`mission modes -- over-the-air, cable and
`satellite -- they are recordable in all
`existing video formats, including 3/4-inch,
`1/2-inch (Beta and VHS), and video disk.
`When programming is transmitted on a 3/4-
`inch format, however, it is important to
`note that many 3/4-inch cassette machines
`do not have framing (field differentiat(cid:173)
`ing) servo systems and will randomly lock
`in the opposite field from a house refer(cid:173)
`ence sync. This will usually be the ad(cid:173)
`vanced vertical from a time base corrector
`when it is connected to the playback
`machine. As a result, Line 21, Field 1
`information may flip to Field 2 on either
`
`183
`
`4
`
`

`
`Line 2 0 or Line 21. '1'he home decoder
`must see caption data on Line 21, Field
`1 in order to decode and display captions.
`(The Sony BVU series, or its equivalent,
`that employs a framing servo does have this
`problem and can be used with a time base
`corrector without exhibiting field rever(cid:173)
`sal providing the program was recorded
`on a machine with a framing servo.)
`
`If a non-framing servo machine is used
`for playback with no time base correction
`and the signal that was recorded is at
`proper IRE levels, then Line 21, Field 1
`information recorded on the tape will re(cid:173)
`main unaltered during playback, allowing
`captions to be decoded and displayed on
`the home receiver.
`
`LINE 21 AND TELETEXT
`
`The FCC decision last month to pre(cid:173)
`serve Line 21 for closed captioning came
`as welcome
`support to hearing-impaired
`consumers who have made an investment
`of over 30 million dollars in home de(cid:173)
`coding equipment to date. The open-market
`approach to teletext standards,including
`the ruling by the Commissioners that cable
`television systems are not bound by the
`must-carry rule insofar as broadcast
`teletext services are concerned,and the
`adoption of incompatible teletext systems
`by broadcasters and cablecasters alike,
`will mean that for the foreseeable future
`the Line 21 system will remain the only
`national delivery system for program-re(cid:173)
`lated captions.
`
`With the advent of teletext in the
`United States, NCI recognizes the practi(cid:173)
`cality of making the Line 21 system
`compatible with the various teletext
`
`systems so that hearing-impaired
`viewers who invest in teletext decoders
`do not also need Line 21 decoders. To(cid:173)
`ward that end NCI·has been cooperating
`with World Standard and NABTS teletext
`equipment manufacturers to develop a
`black box which can transcode Line 21
`captions to either teletext format.
`Such transcoders will enable captions
`to pass as usual on Line 21 and to be
`duplicated and transmitted simultaneously
`in the appropriate teletext format.
`
`In November of 1982 such transcoding
`between Line 21 and World Standard
`-
`teletext was successfully demonstrated
`in Washington, D.C. In March, 1983, a
`transcoder was installed at \'VNET-TV
`in New York with transcoded captions
`transmitted by Manhattan Cable. An
`NABTS transcoder is currently under
`development in Canada and is expected
`to be available this fall.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The Line 21 system for closed
`captioning has become widely accepted
`and utilized in the four years since it
`made its debut, and its growth continues
`at an exciting pace. Major support for
`the system is arising from the cable in(cid:173)
`dustry. The creation, transmission
`and reception of closed captions is
`reliable, straightforward and proven.
`For cable operators who wish to provide
`this valuable service to the hearing
`impaired, the Line 21-based system is
`a cost-effective and trouble-free way
`to do so. NCI has every expectation
`that the growth of cable television across
`the nation will lead to increasing access
`to television for the hearing impaired.
`
`184
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket