`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`Friday, July 08, 2016 6:14 PM
`Cohen, Justin S.
`RE: Chrimar v. ADTRAN et al. - Potential Motion to Stay
`
`Justin,
`
`Does Chrimar have any interest in revisiting stipulating to the transfer of Aerohive to the NDCA? We’re close to filing
`additional ex parte reexamination petitions, but we’d delay doing so if our case is placed on the same schedule as the
`other defendants in the NDCA.
`
`Ryan
`
`From: Smith, Ryan
`Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 4:01 PM
`To: 'Cohen, Justin S.'; ADTRAN-DEFENDANTS; Chrimar_JDG@ltlattorneys.com
`Cc: Chrimar-CV618
`Subject: RE: Chrimar v. ADTRAN et al. - Potential Motion to Stay
`
`Justin,
`
`Aerohive take the same position as Dell regarding Chrimar’s proposal.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Ryan R. Smith |Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 650 Page Mill Road | Palo Alto, CA 94304 | Direct: 650.849.3345 |
`Cell: 650.269.0822 |Email: rsmith@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`From: Cohen, Justin S. [mailto:Justin.Cohen@tklaw.com]
`Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 3:55 PM
`To: ADTRAN-DEFENDANTS; Chrimar_JDG@ltlattorneys.com
`Cc: Chrimar-CV618
`Subject: RE: Chrimar v. ADTRAN et al. - Potential Motion to Stay
`
`Counsel – thus far, Dell has responded that it is interested in Chrimar’s stay proposal. I have not received substantive
`responses from any other defendants.
`
`Based on the flurry of 3rd party subpoenas and new discovery requests, we assume that the remainder are not
`interested in Chrimar’s proposal of staying the case until December.
`
`
`
`Justin S. Cohen | Thompson & Knight LLP
` 214.969.1211 (direct)
`Justin.cohen@tklaw.com | vCard | Bio
`
`
`1
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2092-1
`IPR2016-01759 USPN 8,902,760