`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COM M ERCI;
`United States Pam-it and Trademark Office
`Addmxs; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`I'.0. Bax I450
`Alexmdrln. Virginil 22]! 34450
`www uspm.gnv
`
`APPLICATION NO‘
`031449.413
`
`FILING DATE.
`05124/I995
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`JOHN C. HARVEY
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`5634.l74
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`1756
`
`7590
`'
`70311
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`901 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.
`WASHINGTON, DC 20001
`
`0712411002!
`
`I
`
`GROODYJAMESJ
`ART UNIT
`?AI’ER NUMBER
`2600
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`0712412008
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`AAlpha-Kpetewarna@goodwinprocter.com
`pmentdc@goodwinproc:er.com
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev, D4f07)
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1002
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1002
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 03449413
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2622
`
`Suspension of Action, At the Initiation of the Office
`
`The instant application has a specification that is identical to one or more patents
`1.
`that are currently under reexamination. The issues present in the reexamination
`proceedings are related to the issues in the instant application. The final
`decisions/determinations made at the end of the reexamination proceedings are likely to
`affect the outcome of the application. To this end, it is appropriate to suspend prosecution
`on the instant application.
`Per applicant's request, however, prosecution in 08/470,571 (INTE) and
`08/487,526 (MULT) will not be suspended in order to pursue the issues that have been
`fully developed in these applications. The outcome of these issues is also likely to affect
`the outcome of the present application.
`
`37 CFR 1.103(e) provides that the Office will notify applicant if the Office
`suspends action in an application on its own initiative.
`
`Accordingly, Ex parte prosecution is SUSPENDED FOR A PERIOD OF SIX (6)
`MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THIS LETTER. Upon expiration of the period of
`suspension, applicant should make an inquiry as to the status of the application.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`2.
`examiner should be directed to David Ometz, whose telephone number is (571)272-
`7593. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 7:00 AM to
`4:30 PM. The examiner can also be reached on alternate Fridays. The fax phone number
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 57] -273-8300.
`
`/4/«(.K’.'ne-4c«_.
`
`Mark Powell
`Director
`TC 2600
`
`/David L. Ometzl
`SPE
`Art Unit 2622
`
`I
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1003
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1003
`
`
`
`Docket No.: PMC-003C247
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re Patent Application of:
`John C. Harvey 91 cu‘.
`
`
`
`Application No.: 08/449,413
`
`Filed: May 24, 1995
`
`For: SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND
`METHODS
`
`Confirmation No.: 1756
`
`Art Unit: 2600
`
`Examiner: Gioody, James J.
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENT
`
`MS Amendment
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO. Box I450
`Alexandria, VA 223l3—l45O
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`This application had been suspended since 2005 and held in abeyance from examination
`
`by the Office pending final action in a corresponding so-called “A" application, US. Patent
`
`Application, Serial No. 08/449,263. This suspension was based on an agreement made between
`
`Applicants and the Office to consolidate or group the claims of Applicants’ then pending
`
`applications which had been filed prior to June 3, 1995, into a smaller number of applications.
`
`This so-called consolidation agreement resulted from a series of interviews conducted from
`
`November‘ 1998 through June I999 between Applicants’ representatives and the Office.
`
`In those
`
`interviews, senior Office management suggested that further examination of this application and
`
`Applicants’ other related applications could be expedited by reducing the number of pending
`
`applications. Accordingly, Applicants agreed to consolidate their claims into 56 subject matter
`
`groups and to reduce the number of pending applications accordingly. Applicants’ agreement
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1004
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1004
`
`
`
`was based on the Office’s view that it would be helpful to the Office to examine the claims of the
`
`subject matter groups together.
`
`For each subject matter group, the applications were separated based on whether priority
`
`was claimed to Applicants’ initial 1931 Application (US. Serial No, 06/3 175 l0) or their initial
`
`l987 Continuation-in-Part Application (U.S. Serial No. 07/096,096). The claims from all
`
`applications in a group having the same priority claim were added to a single application
`
`designated an “A” application. The remaining applications were abandoned with the exception
`
`of one so—called “B" application corresponding to each "A" application.
`
`Under this agreement, the PTO suspended prosecution in the “B” applications pending
`
`final action in the corresponding "A" applications. Further, the parties agreed to conduct
`
`interviews in the “A" applications so that the prosecution of those applications could be
`
`efficiently advanced. Under the agreement, subject matter not found to be allowable during
`
`prosecution of an “A" application may be further prosecuted in the “B” application while the
`
`“A" application would be allowed to issue.
`
`In good faith reliance on this consolidation
`
`agreement, Applicants abandoned 169 of their 329 pending applications and filed numerous
`
`amendments adding to the designated "A" applications various claims that had been pending in
`
`the abandoned applications and the designated "B" applications.'
`
`On May 9, 2000, Applicants amended the DECR 81 group "A” application, US. Patent
`
`Application Serial No. 08/449,263, in accordance with the aforementioned agreement. Claims
`
`from related DECR 81 applications were added to the DECR 31 group “A" application,
`
`I As a result of the consolidation. Applicants paid excess claim fees for many of the claims that were added to the
`designated “/\" applications. even though Applicants previously paid excess claim fees for those claims when
`they had been added to the abandoned applications and the designated "B" applications.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1005
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1005
`
`
`
`Applicants amended some of the “A" Claims on March 8, 2002.
`
`In late 2002 and early
`
`2003, reexamination requests were filed and granted as to Applicants’ seven previously issued
`
`patents. Subsequent to the initiation of these reexamination proceedings, the Director of
`
`Technology Center 2600 decided to suspend prosecution of this application and the related "A"
`
`application pending resolution of the reexamination proceedings for the issued patents and the
`
`prosecution to appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and lnterferences ("Board") of two of
`
`Applicants’ pending applications, (l) the INTE application (US Patent Application, Serial No.
`
`08/470,571) and (2) the MULT application (U.S. Patent Application, Serial No. 08/487,526). As
`
`a result of this decision, the DECR 81 group “A” application (U.S. Patent Application, Serial No.
`
`08/449,263) was suspended through a number of six month Suspension Notices until January
`
`2009. Consequently, no formal response was made regarding the “A" Claims.
`
`In 2009, as the reexamination proceedings for Applicants’ issued patents had been
`
`substantially completed and decisions had been issued by the Board in the INTE and MULT
`
`applications, Applicants requested that the suspension of their various applications be
`
`terminated.
`
`This request was granted in the spring of 2009 and, as a result, applicants met with
`
`Examiner Minh Dieu T. Nguyen for a number of personal interviews in January 20l0. An
`
`agreement was made to cancel or amend numerous of the "A" Claims so that the DECR 8l
`
`group “A” application (U.S. Patent Application Serial No.08/449,263) could issue.
`
`In the instant application, DECR 81 group “B" (US. Patent Application Serial No.
`
`08/449,4l3), Applicants filed a Supplemental Amendment Under 37 C.F.R. §l .l 15 on May 9,
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1006
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1006
`
`
`
`2000. Applicants canceled all claims except for claim 2, which they amended. The Examiner
`
`then suspended the application according to the above mentioned consolidation agreement.
`
`Consistent with the consolidation agreement between the Applicants and the Office,
`
`Applicants now wish to pursue the subject matter within the scope of the “A" Claims ot" the
`
`DECR 81 group “A" application (US. Patent Application Serial No. 08/449,263) by claiming
`
`such subject matter that was not patented in the “A" application in the instant “B" application.
`
`Claims 22-55 correspond to various claims of the “A” application with additional amendments
`
`that Applicants believe place the claims in condition for allowance.
`
`In order to aid the Examiner
`
`in understanding the amendments to the claim, Applicants have attached a marked up copy of the
`
`claims (Appendix A) indicating the differences between the “A" Claims and the amended form
`
`submitted herein as claims 22-55.
`
`Applicants believe that claims 22—55 overcome the prior art, and should place the above-
`
`identified patent application in condition for allowance. Applicants respectfully request
`
`favorable consideration of the above—identified patent application in view of the following
`
`remarks.
`
`Claim 2 which is currently pending in this application will be cancelled.
`
`Amendments to the claims begin on page 5.
`
`Remarks begin on page 14.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1007
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1007
`
`
`
`AMENDMENT TO THE CLAIMS
`
`Ap,r)l'it'(r.m‘.s' requ9.s'I €m‘er'ing the below (rr7Im(1irr€rrI3'
`
`In the r'lcrim.s'. New r'r'cr.-‘rm’ 22-55 are
`
`crdcletl. Claim 2 is ('€!l'Y('£‘.l1£’(l.
`
`C,'I(rim.s‘ 22-55 are the (July perrclirrg ('I(rir7r.s‘.
`
`l — 21. (Cancelled)
`
`22,
`
`(New) A method for controlling the decryption of encrypted programming at a
`
`subscriber station, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving encrypted programming, said encrypted programming having an encrypted
`
`control signal;
`
`detecting said control signal;
`
`passing said control signal to a decryptor at said subscriber station;
`
`decrypting said control signal;
`
`decrypting said encrypted programming to form decrypted programming based on said
`
`control signal; and
`
`presenting said decrypted programming to a viewer or listener.
`
`23.
`
`(New) A method for controlling the decryption of programming at 21 subscriber
`
`station, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving programming, said programming having a first encrypted digital control
`
`signal portion and an encrypted digital information portion;
`
`detecting said first encrypted digital control signal portion of said programming;
`
`passing said first encrypted digital control signal portion of said programming to a
`
`first decryptor at said subscriber station;
`
`decrypting said first encrypted digital control signal portion of said programming
`
`using said first decryptor at said subscriber station;
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1008
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1008
`
`
`
`passing said encrypted digital information portion of said programming and the
`
`decrypted control signal portion to a second decryptor at said subscriber station;
`
`decrypting said encrypted digital information portion of said programming using
`
`said second decryptor at said subscriber station based on the decrypted control signal portion;
`and
`
`presenting said programming.
`
`24.
`
`(New) A method of controlling a remote transmitter station to communicate
`
`program material to a subscriber station and controlling said subscriber station to process or
`
`output a unit of programming, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving a control signal which operates at the remote transmitter station to
`
`control the communication ofa unit of programming and one or more first instruct signals and
`
`communicating said control signal to said remote transmitter station;
`
`receiving a code or datum identifying a unit of programming to be transmitted by
`
`the remote transmitter station, said remote transmitter station transferring said unit of
`
`programming to a transmitter;
`
`receiving at said remote transmitter station one or more second instruct signals
`
`which operate at the subscriber station to identify or decrypt said unit of programming or said
`
`one or more first instruct signals, said remote transmitter station transferring said one or more
`
`second instruct signals to said transmitter; and
`
`transmitting from said remote transmitter station an information transmission
`
`comprising said unit of programming, said one or more first instruct signals, and said one or
`
`more second instruct signals, said one or more first instruct signals being transmitted in
`
`accordance with said control signal.
`
`25.
`
`(New) The method of claim 23, wherein said programming further includes
`
`encrypted video,
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1009
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1009
`
`
`
`26.
`
`(New) The method of claim 23, wherein said subscriber station stores
`
`information that evidences processing said programming.
`
`27.
`
`(New) The method of claim 23, wherein said programming is received at said
`
`subscriber station in one channel of a multichannel signal and a second control signal portion
`
`used to decrypt said programming is included in said multichannel signal outside said one
`channel.
`
`28.
`
`(New) The method of claim 23, wherein said subscriber station detects, in a
`
`transmission channel including said programming, a second control signal portion used to
`
`decrypt the first control signal portion.
`
`29,
`
`(New) The method of claim 23, wherein the subscriber station detects, in a
`
`transmission channel for transmitting the programming, a second control signal portion used to
`
`decrypt the first control signal portion, and wherein the second control signal portion is
`
`encrypted, and wherein the second control signal portion is decrypted in order to enable
`
`decryption of the first control signal portion.
`
`30.
`
`(New) The method of claim 23, wherein said programming includes computer
`
`data.
`
`31.
`
`(New) A method of controlling at least one ofa plurality of receiver stations, said
`
`method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving downloadable code which is effective at said at least one of said
`
`plurality of receiver stations to implement a new technique of decrypting and delivering the
`downloadable code to at least one transmitter;
`
`receiving said at least one control signal which at said at least one of said plurality
`
`of receiver stations operates to execute the downloadable code; and
`
`causing said at least one control signal to be communicated to said at least one
`
`transmitter at a specific time,
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1010
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1010
`
`
`
`thereby to transmit at least one information transmission including the
`
`downloadable code and said at least one control signal.
`
`32.
`
`(New) The method of claim 31, wherein a television program is displayed at a
`
`receiver station and said downloadable code and said at least one control signal program said
`
`receiver station to decrypt said television program in accordance with said new technique.
`
`33.
`
`(New) A method of communicating television program material to one or more
`
`receiver stations, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving a television program at a transmitter station and delivering said
`
`television program to a transmitter;
`
`receiving and storing one or more instruct signals at said transmitter station, said
`
`one or more instruct signals at said one or more receiver stations operative to implement a new
`
`technique of decrypting;
`
`transferring said one or more instruct signals to said transmitter; and
`
`transmitting said television program and said one or more instruct signals from
`said transmitter station to said one or more receiver stations.
`
`34.
`
`(New) A method of processing signals at a receiver station comprising the steps
`
`of:
`
`signals;
`
`receiving at least one information transmission;
`
`detecting a plurality of signals on said at least one information transmission;
`
`changing a decryption technique in response to at least a first of said plurality of
`
`decrypting a second of said plurality of signals on the basis of said changed
`
`decryption technique;
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1011
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1011
`
`
`
`passing said decrypted second of said plurality of signals to a controllable device‘,
`
`and
`
`controlling said controllable device on the basis of said passed decrypted second
`
`of said plurality of signals.
`
`35,
`
`(New) The method of claim 33, wherein said step of transferring is performed
`
`based on comparison.
`
`(New) The method of claim 33, wherein said step of transferring is performed in
`36.
`accordance with a schedule.
`
`37,
`
`(New)..The method of claim 36, wherein said schedule specifies a transmission
`
`time and a transmission channel, said method further comprising the steps of receiving and
`
`storing said schedule at said transmitter station.
`
`38.
`
`(New) The method of claim 33, wherein said one or more instruct signals operate
`
`at said one or more receiver stations based on an identifier, said method further comprising the
`
`step of transmitting said identifier.
`
`39.
`
`(New) The method of claim 38, wherein an information transmission including
`
`said television program is received at said one or more receiver stations, wherein said television
`
`program is outputted at said one or more receiver stations, and wherein said identifier identifies
`
`at least one of(i) said television program and (ii) a channel including said television program.
`
`40,
`
`(New) A method of processing signals at a receiver station comprising the steps
`
`of:
`
`receiving at least one information transmission;
`
`detecting a plurality of signals in said at least one information transmission, a first
`
`signal of said plurality of signals including downloadable code;
`
`passing said downloadable code to a processor;
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1012
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1012
`
`
`
`controlling a decryptor to decrypt in a specific fashion on the basis of said
`downloadable code;
`
`decrypting at least one second signal of said plurality of signals in said specific
`
`fashion; and
`
`device.
`
`passing said at least one second signal to one of said processor and an output
`
`41 .
`
`(New) A method of controlling a receiver station to detect digital data and control
`
`a decryptor based on a varying pattern of timing or location, said method of controlling
`
`comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving programming and delivering said programming to a transmitter;
`
`receiving digital data comprising at least an instruct signal and communicating
`
`said digital data to a signal embedder, said instruct signal operative at said receiver station to
`
`control said decryptor;
`
`controlling said signal embedder to embed said digital data in an information
`
`transmission in a varying pattern of timing or location;
`
`communicating said information transmission to said transmitter; and
`
`transmitting said programming and said information transmission including said
`
`digital data.
`
`42,
`
`(New) A method of processing signals at a receiver station comprising the steps
`
`of:
`
`receiving at least one information transmission;
`
`detecting a plurality of signals on said at least one information transmission;
`
`decrypting at least one of said plurality of signals, said at least one decrypted
`
`signal including at least one instruct signal which is effective to instruct;
`
`l0
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1013
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1013
`
`
`
`passing the at least one decrypted instruct signal to a controllable device; and
`
`controlling said controllable device on the basis of decrypted information
`
`included in said at least one decrypted instruct signal.
`
`43,
`
`(New) A method for decryptor activation in a network comprising:
`
`receiving a transmission comprising encrypted materials;
`
`decrypting under first processor control a first portion of said encrypted materials
`in said transmission;
`
`inputting said first portion of said encrypted materials to a decryptor;
`
`decrypting under second processor control a second portion of said encrypted
`
`materials based on said step of decrypting said first portion of said encrypted materials.
`
`44.
`
`(New) The method ofc aim 43 wherein said transmission in said step of
`
`receiving a transmission is a multichannel signal separated in the frequency domain.
`
`45,
`broadcast.
`
`(New) The method of C aim 44 wherein said transmission is a cable system
`
`46.
`
`(New) The method of c aim 43 wherein said transmission in said step of
`
`receiving a transmission is a multichannel signal separated in the time domain.
`
`47,
`
`(New) The method ofc aim 43 wherein said transmission in said step of
`
`receiving a transmission is generated at a local data source.
`
`43.
`
`(New) The method ofc aim 47 wherein said local data source comprises a VCR.
`
`49.
`
`(New) The method ofc aim 47 wherein said local data source comprises a laser
`
`disk.
`
`50.
`
`(New) The method of c aim 43 wherein said encrypted materials comprise a
`
`portion of a television program.
`
`ll
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1014
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1014
`
`
`
`51,
`
`(New) The method of claim 43, wherein said transmission in said step of
`
`receiving a transmission and a signal necessary for decryption are received from different
`SOLll'C€.S'.
`
`52,
`
`(New) The method of claim 51, further comprising the step of contacting a
`
`remote transmitter station to receive one of said transmission and said signal necessary for
`
`decryption.
`
`53.
`
`(New) The method of claim 51, wherein a signal necessary for decryption is
`
`communicated by telephone.
`
`54,
`
`(New) A method of providing an enabling signal to a receiver station from a
`
`remote data source, said enabling signal for use in decrypting at the receiver station a
`
`programming signal, said receiver station being programmed to get information necessary for
`
`enabling a programming signal, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`storing at the remote data source one or more control signals for enabling a
`
`decryptor to decrypt a video;
`
`receiving at the remote data source from the receiver station a communication to
`
`get specific enabling information;
`
`communicating, from the remote data source to the receiver station in response to
`
`said communication from the receiver station, a control signal,
`
`whereby the receiver station inputs said control signal to a decryptor, and wherein
`
`said decryptor decrypts said programming signal.
`
`55.
`
`(New) A method of processing signals at a receiver station comprising the steps
`
`of:
`
`receiving one or more information transmissions at said receiver station;
`
`detecting a plurality of signals on said one or more information transmissions, at
`
`least a first of one of said plurality of signals including a control signal;
`
`l2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1015
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1015
`
`
`
`controlling a deciyptor in response to said contml signal;
`
`decrypting or enabling communication of at least :1 second of said plurality of
`
`signals on the basis of said step of controlling said decryptor;
`
`passing said decrypted or enabled at least said second of said plurality of signals
`to a controllable device; and
`
`controlling said controllable device on the basis of said passed decrypted or
`
`enabled at least said second of said plurality of signals.
`
`l3
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1016
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1016
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Status of claims
`
`REMARKS
`
`New claims 2255 have been added, They correspond to claims 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
`
`11,12,l9,2l,40,4l,42,43,44, 89,93, 109,111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116,117, 118, 123, 125,
`
`127, 131, and 134 of the DECR 81 group “A” application (US. Patent Application Serial No.
`
`08/449,263.) The newly presented claims are fully supported by the specification and do not
`
`introduce new matter.
`
`Each of the claims is patentable in light of the prior art. Prior patents Hartung (U.S.
`
`Patent No. 4,019,201), Tang (US. Patent No. 4,253,] 14), and Bond (US. Patent No. 4,390,898)
`
`were cited as having subject matter similar to some of the claims now introduced in claims 22-
`
`55. All three patents disclose the use of encoded control signals or other data to control the
`
`unscrambling of an analog video signal.
`
`The claims of this amendment, however, claim material relating to the encryption and
`
`decryption of signals. Claim 22 is “[a] method for controlling the decryption of encrypted
`
`programming” and contains a step of “decrypting said encrypted programming.” Claim 23 is
`
`“[a] method for controlling the decryption of programming” and contains a step of “decrypting
`
`said encrypted digital information portion of said programming.” Claim 24 contains a step of
`
`receiving an instruct signal that can operate to “decrypt said unit of programming or said first
`
`instruct signal." Claim 31 contains a step of receiving downloadable code that is effective to
`
`“implement a new technique of decrypting.” Claim 33 contains a step of receiving instruct
`
`signals that are operative to "implement a new technique of decrypting." Claim 34 contains a
`
`step of “decrypting a second of said plurality of signals.” Claim 40 contains a step of
`
`"controlling a decryptor to decrypt in a specific fashion" and a step of“decrypting at least one
`
`second signal of said plurality of signals." Claim 41 is a method to “detect digital data and
`
`14
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1017
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1017
`
`
`
`control a decryptor” and contains a step of “receiving digital data." Claim 42 contains a step of
`
`“decrypting at least one of said plurality of signals," Claim 43 is “[a] method for decryptor
`
`activation" and contains a step of “decrypting under first processor control a first portion of said
`
`encrypted materials." Claim 54 contains a step wherein a “decr'yptor‘ decrypts said programming
`
`signal.” Claim 55 contains a step of “controlling a decryptor" and at step of “decrypting or
`
`enabling communication of at least a second of said plurality of signals."
`
`The Board of Patent Appeals and lnterferences decided in Ex parte Personalized Media
`
`Communications, LLC (Appeal 2008-4228, Iixprrrre Reexamination Control 90/006,536) at
`
`pages 53-54, that encryption requires a digital signal. Each of the claims of this amendment
`
`involves the use of digital signals either through reference to "digital" signals or through
`
`reference to “decryption” and “encryption." “Encryption and decryption,” the Board goes on to
`
`say, “are not broad enough to read on scrambling and unscrambling." Therefore, because
`
`Hartung, Tang, and Bond are directed to unscrambling of analog signals, none teach or suggest a
`
`method of controlling the decryption of digital information as is presented in the claims ofthis
`
`amendment.
`
`Upon entry of this paper‘, claims 22-55 will be pending and under consideration,
`
`Reconsideration is respectfully requested based on the above amendments.
`
`II.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicants respectfully submit that all claims are in condition for examination and
`
`prompt examination on the merits is earnestly requested.
`
`In the event Applicants have
`
`overlooked the need for an extension of time, payment of fee, or additional payment of fee,
`
`Applicants hereby petition therefore and authorize that any charges be made to Deposit Account
`
`No. 50-4494.
`
`l5
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1018
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1018
`
`
`
`Should the Examiner have any questions regarding any of the above, the Examiner is
`
`respectfully requested to telephone the undersigned at ZUZ~346~40U0.
`
`Dated: April 05, 201 l
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By /Thomasl. Scott Jrl
`Thomas J. Scott, Jr.
`Registration No; 27,836
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 346-4000
`Attorney for Applicants
`
`l6
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1019
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1019
`
`
`
`Appendix A
`
`Marked up Copy of Claims 22-55 Indicating the Differences Between Them and Claims 2,
`
`3, 4, 5, 6, 7, S, 9,10,11,12,19, 21, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 89, 93,109,111,112,113,114,11S,116,
`
`117, 118, 123, I25, I27, I31, and 134 of the DECR 81 Group “A” Application
`
`(US. Patent Application Serial No. 08/449,263)
`
`22.
`
`A method for controlling the decryption of encrypted programming at a
`
`subscriber station, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving encrypted programming, encrypted programming having an encrypted control
`
`signal;
`
`station;
`
`detecting said control signal;
`
`passing said control signal to
`
`a deciyptor at said subscriber
`
`decrypting said control signal;
`
`decrypting said encrypted programming to form decrypted programming based on said
`
`control signal; and
`
`presenting said decrypted programming to a viewer or listener.
`
`23.
`
`A method for controlling the decryption of programming at a subscriber station,
`
`said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving programming, said programming having a first encrypted digital control
`
`signal portion and an encrypted digital information portion;
`
`I7
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1020
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1020
`
`
`
`detecting said first encrypted digital control signal portion of said programming;
`
`passing said first encrypted digital control signal portion of said programming to a
`
`first decryptor‘ at said subscriber station;
`
`decrypting said first encrypted digital control signal portion of said programming
`
`using said first decryptor at said subscriber station;
`
`passing said encrypted digital information portion of said programming
`
`and the decrypted control signal portion to a second decryptor at said subscriber station;
`
`decrypting said encrypted digital information portion of said programming using
`
`said second decryptor at said subscriber station based on the decrypted control signal portion;
`and
`
`presenting said programming.
`
`24,
`
`A method of controlling a remote transmitter station to communicate program
`
`material to a subscriber station and controlling said subscriber station to process or output digital
`
`programming, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving
`
`a first control signal which operates at
`
`the remote transmitter station to control communication of said digital programming and one or
`
`more first instnrct signals,
`
` .‘ and communicating said control
`
`signal to said remote transmitter station;
`
`receiving an identifier designating said digital programming to be transmitted by
`the remote transmitter station said remote transmitter station transferrin said digital
`
`programming to a transmitter;
`
`receiving at said remote transmitter station said one or more digital second
`
`instruct signals which operate at the subscriber station
`
`Q
`
`identify or decrypt said digital programming or said one or more first instruct signals; said
`
`l8
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1021
`
`PMC Exhibit 2012
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1021
`
`
`
`remote transmitter station transferring said one or more second instruct signals to said
`
`and
`
`transmitting from said remote transmitter station to said subscriber station an
`
`information transmission comprising said unit of programming, said one or more first instruct
`
`signals, and said one or more second instruct signals, said one or more first instruct signals being
`
`transmitted in accordance with said
`
`control signal.
`
`25.
`
`The method
`
`of claim 23, wherein said programming further
`
`includes encrypted video.
`
`26,
`
`The method
`
`of claim 23, wherein said subscriber station
`
`stores information that evidences processing said programming.
`
`27.
`
`The method of claim SQ, wherein said programming is received at said
`
`subscriber station in one channel of a multichannel signal and a second control signal portion
`
`used to decrypt said programming is included in said multichannel sig