`IPR2016-01407
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`SONY CORPORATION, SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB, and SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,928,433
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01407
`
`
`PATENT OWNER REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper
`
`Patent No. 6,928,433
`IPR2016-01407
`
`
`
`
`14), Patent Owner Creative Technology Limited respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the issues set forth below on August 29, 2017 at a time set by the
`
`Board.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner requests a 90-minute hearing, with 45 minutes of argument
`
`time for Patent Owner and 45 minutes of argument time for Petitioners. Patent
`
`Owner requests oral argument on all issues raised in the parties’ filings, including
`
`but not limited to the following:
`
`1. Whether claims 2, 3, 5, 7, and 17-28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,433 are
`
`unpatentable based on the grounds upon which the Board instituted
`
`trial;
`
`2. Whether Petitioners’ Reply contains arguments and evidence that are
`
`beyond the proper scope permitted under the rules;
`
`3. Any issues specified in Patent Owner’s motion for observations
`
`regarding cross-examination;
`
`4. Any issues specified by Petitioners in a request for oral argument;
`
`5. Rebuttal to Petitioners’ presentation on all matters; and
`
`6. Any issues otherwise raised by the Board.
`
`In the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper 14), the Board indicated that the
`
`panel is available to hear the oral argument either in Denver, Colorado or in
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Alexandria, Virginia. In general, Patent Owner prefers to hold the oral argument
`
`Patent No. 6,928,433
`IPR2016-01407
`
`
`in Denver because that location is more convenient than the Alexandria location
`
`for Patent Owner’s counsel and representatives who will be traveling to the oral
`
`argument from California. However, Patent Owner believes that the most
`
`important consideration is which location will enable more panel members to
`
`attend in person. Accordingly, Patent Owner requests that the oral argument be
`
`held at the location that will permit as many panel members as possible to attend in
`
`person. To the extent that an equal number of panel members could attend in
`
`person at both locations, then Patent Owner requests that the oral argument be held
`
`in Denver.
`
`Patent Owner also requests that the Board provide audio-visual equipment to
`
`display a demonstrative PowerPoint presentation. The requested equipment
`
`includes a projector to be connected to Patent Owner’s laptop computer, and a
`
`screen for displaying the projected image.
`
`
`Date: July 24, 2017
`
`
`
`2
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
` /Jonathan D. Baker/
`Jonathan D. Baker, Reg. No. 45708
`Farney Daniels PC
`411 Borel Avenue, Suite 310
`San Mateo, California 94402
`Phone: 424-268-5210
`E-mail: jbaker@farneydaniels.com
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Patent No. 6,928,433
`IPR2016-01407
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner
`
`Request for Oral Argument Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.70(a) was served via email on
`
`July 24, 2017, on the attorneys for the Petitioners:
`
`Michael N. Rader, Reg. No. 52,146
`Randy J. Pritzker, Reg. No. 35, 986
`Andrew J. Tibbetts, Reg. No. 65,139
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210-2206
`Telephone: 617-646-8000
`Fax: 617-646-8646
`Emails: rpritzker-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`mrader-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`atibbetts-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Jonathan D. Baker/
`Jonathan D. Baker, Reg. No. 45,708
`
`Date: July 24, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
