throbber

`
`
`
`65.207.2.2Downloaded on 2017-06-19 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract). 
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1047
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01378
`
`

`

`Vol. 130, No. 2
`
`THREE-LAYER RESIST SYSTEM
`
`479
`
`layer perpendicular to the underlying grating struc-
`tures. Exposures were performed either with a direct
`write Vector Scan electron beam system (39) or with
`a 5x step-and-repeat optical projection printer (40).
`The exposed and developed image pattern in the AZ
`resist layer was replicated in the sandwiched Si film
`by RIE in a CF4 plasma (41). Transfer of the Si pattern
`to the underlying PMMA layer was performed either
`by flood exposure to deep u.v. radiation (ZOO-.260 nm)
`followed by development of the image pattern in or-
`ganic solvents, or by in situ RIE in an oxygen plasma
`(11-14, 19-29). A typical process sequence is outlined
`below and is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1. Typi-
`cal patterns of PMMA resist lines crossing over SiOz
`steps are shown in Fig. 2.
`Process sequence.—Spin-coat HMDS. Spin-coat 1 pm
`PMMA.
`(Dupont Elvacite 2041, 10% by weight
`in
`2-methoxyethyl other). Bake 15 min at 85°C. Repeat,
`spin-coat 1 pm PMMA. Bake 1 hr at 160°C. Deposit
`amorphous Si 30-200 nm by plasma CVD of SiH4 or by
`electron gun evaporation of Si. Bake 1 hr at 100°C in
`air. Spin-coat HMDS. Spin-coat 0.45 am A21350J using
`2 AZ1350J21 AZ thinner. Bake 15 min at 85°C. Expose
`test pattern either by (i) electron beam at 30 HC/sz,
`20 keV, or (it) on a 5x optical projection printer at
`15 mJ/cm“ using 405 nm monochromatic radiation. De-
`velop image in AZ developer,
`then bake 30 min at
`100°C. RIE Si in CF4. RIE patterning:
`(i) In situ RIE
`PMMA in 02 plasma, and (ii) dip etch 5-10 sec in buf-
`fered HF to clean off residues. Deep u.v. patterning: (i)
`flood expose to deep u.v. at 0.5-1 J/cm’, and (ti) de-
`velop image in either chlorobenzene or methyl isobutyl
`ketone (MIBK).
`
`Resist films—Although resist films other than PMMA
`were used for planarization, PMMA was selected for
`
`
`
`Fig. 2. Typical high resolution line/space test patterns in the
`three-layer system AZ/Si/PMMA defined over i am high grating
`structures etched in an Sl°2 film. Top: Optical micrograph of part
`of the test pattern showing line/space features ranging between
`0.5-5 urn. Bottom: SEM of equal line/space features 3 am wide in
`3 pm thick PMMA generated by RIE in oxygen.
`
`EXPOSE
`I
`_
`a beam
`- PROJECTION
`
`Dix/£4)?
`
`EYCH
`:75.
`
`,
`
`
`
`Lyflf
`
`3
`
`[IMAGING
`ncss‘r
`’9
`,
`r
`PLANARIz Nc
`fissusr
`suaswni
`
`IQESIST
`a- S
`_
`::.--
`
`>
`[—w—-
`V: eaESIsr
`‘
`A
`suestnrre
`
`,—
`.—_
`.rRtSISl
`Va,
`mieem,k,—:tiy a_s
`_.i::'i_,, ,,
`i
`RtSIsI
`,
`,3
`SLESYFATE
`2,,
`7 H
`EXPCSE r/
`
`\,
`
`detailed study because of its deep u.v. sensitivity (42)
`and its high etching rate in an 02 plasma. PMMA films
`>1 um thick were obtained by applying multiple coat-
`ings in order to avoid cracking, and to promote better
`planarization of the substrate surface as discussed be-
`low. Adhesion of PMMA to Si and SiOg surfaces was
`enhanced by prior coating with the adhesion promoter
`hexamethyl disilazane (HMDS). However, the use of
`HMDS was essential to ensure adequate adhesion of
`AZ1350J photoresist to the Si surface.
`Despite its low sensitivity, AZ1350J resist was se-
`lected as an imaging layer because it offered the con-
`venience of both optical and electron beam sensitivity.
`The initial thickness of AZl350J resist was reduced by
`~0.1 um after development to a final nominal thick-
`ness of 0.4 am. The latter was quite adequate to mask
`the underlying Si layer in a CF4 plasma during the pat-
`tern transfer process.
`Silicon films—Plasma CVD silicon films were depos-
`ited in the plasma reactor illustrated in Fig. 3 using a
`mixture of Sin and He at 4 and 65 mTorr partial pres-
`sures, respectively. The wafers were placed on the 125
`mm diameter lower electrode, and after pumping to
`a pressure of 5 x 10-7 Torr, the deposition was per-
`formed at 50°C substrate temperature, at a rate of 15
`nm/min using a power density of 0.6 W/cm”. Films de-
`posited under
`these conditions were hydrogenated
`amorphous silicon containing as much as 30% H2 (43-
`46). Films obtained by electron gun evaporation of
`pure silicon on substrates maintained at or slightly
`above room temperature were functionally indistin-
`guishable from CVD Si films.
`Thin films obtained by plasma CVD of silane and
`electron gun evaporation of silicon were particularly
`Fig. I. Deep in. and RIE processes for patterning over topography
`weu suited for lithographic processing because the
`using the three-layer resist system AZl350J/Si/PMMA. The elec.
`films were clear, smooth, and amorphous. The optimum
`tron beam or optically exposed pattern is generated in the thin top
`thickness for most patterning applications was 90 1- 20
`AZ layer, and then replicated in the sandwiched amorphous silicon
`nm although patterns were defined in films 30-200 nm
`film by II! in Ch. The Si pattern is transferred to the thick bot-
`thick. Silicon films were transparent
`in the visible
`tom PMMA planarizing layer by deep I.v. exposure and solvent
`development or by II! in oxygen.
`spectrum as shown in Fig. 4, but more importantly.
`Dmbaded on 2017-06-19 to IP 65207.22 addrm. Redstribution subject I) ECS terms of me (see ecsdl.orysitelterms use) urless CC License in phoe (see distract).
`
`x-aooeaoorn”‘
`
`.
`.
`;
`L
`,;
`
`\
`
`PESISY
`rs.
`vuun
`SLBSTFATE
`
`DEVELOP.
`
`I
`‘....._
`
`\\
`‘\
`. . . . ._
`l
`~L-uu-i
`.
`,
`
`‘
`an:
`
`er
`
`..
`
`moi
`HANARIZING
`PESis‘
`»_J
`j sunSYPATF
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`480
`
`J. Electrochem. Soc.: SOLID—STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
`
`February 1983
`
`PLASMA CVD DEPOSITION SYSTEM
`
`R F
`
`GENERATOR
`
`MAl'CHING
`
`
`
`COOLING
`
`
`
`
`PLASM A
`
`SUBSTRATES
`
`___TO meme
`STACK
`
`SPUTTER
`
`THERMO
`COUPLE
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`
`
`
`GENERATOR
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3. Sketch of plasma CVD system for the deposition of‘hydro-
`genated amorphous silicon films from a silone/helium mixture. The
`14 cm diameter electrodes 6 cm apart operated at 13.56 MHz.
`Typical conditions: Sit-l4 4 mTorr, He 65 InTorr, upper electrode
`850V,
`lower (substrate) electrode 0V, power 0.6 W/cmz, deposition
`rate is nm/min.
`
`they were totally opaque in the deep u.v. region below
`300 nm. The films were excellent blocking layers for
`deep u.v. pattern transfer applications as suggested by
`the PCM techniques discussed by Lin (1, 4, 16-18).
`Pattern replication—Transfer of the image pattern
`from the top AZ layer to the Si film was performed by
`RIE in a diode reactor with a perforated grounded alu-
`minum catcher plate positioned between the electrodes
`to minimize backseattering of sputtered aluminum
`
`AMORPHOUS Si (0mm)
`
`0.62pm
`
`'00
`90
`
`80
`
`NI0
`
`(47). The system was first pumped dam to 10" Torr,
`and Si was then etched in CF4 at 2.5 m'I'orr pmure,
`0.25 W/cm2 rf power density at 13.56 MHz. Using end-
`point laser detection (48) and 50% overetching beyond
`and point ensured complete and uniform removal of
`the Si layer.
`Etching of the underlying PMMA or polymer layer
`was performed in an oxygen plasma at 20 mTorr pres-
`sure and 0.06 W/cm2 rf power density. Overetching
`Varied between 50 and. 100% depending on the topog-
`raphy present and the maximum thickness of resist.
`The etch rates of the 3 layers viz., Si, A21350J, and
`PMMA in CF; were 40, 50, and 70 nm/min, respec-
`tively, while in 02 the etch rates of the same films
`were 0, 35, and 70 nm/min, respectively. Replication
`of the AZ image pattern in an Si film 100 nm thick re-
`sulted in an AZ film loss of 200 nm, while replication
`into a PMMA layer £1 urn resulted in the total loss or
`the AZ film.
`'
`Transfer of the Si image pattern to the PMMA layer
`was also performed by flood exposure to deep u.v. ra-
`diation, followed by development in either chloroben-
`zene or MIBK at room temperature. A 1 kW Hg-Xe
`deep u.v. source manufactured by Hanovia was used
`to expose individual wafers in air. The exposure time
`varied between 2-10 min depending on the sensitivity
`and thickness of the planarizing resist as well as on
`the composition of the developing solvent. To obtain_
`the same dissolution rate of PMMA, the deep u.v. ex-
`posure necessary for MIBK development was approxi-
`mately twice that required for chlorobenzene.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`High-resolution line/space features over 1 pm topog-
`raphy were defined in the three-layer system AZ/Si/
`PMMA using RIE and deep u.v. patterning techniques.
`The minimum dimension defined in PMMA layers 1-3
`pm thick was 0.5 pm using electron beam exposure of
`the top AZ layer. Optical exposure on a 5X step-and-
`repeat projection system using 405 nm monochromatic
`radiation produced minimum line/space features of 1
`am. Figure 5 shows 1 pm and 0.75 pm line/space fea-
`tures defined in the Si layer, and replicated in 2 nm
`thick PMMA by deep u.v. exposure, and development
`in chlorobenzene. Similar test patterns 1
`rim/0.5 pm
`
`
`
`m9
`
`'36TRANSMISSION4)0|0O
`
`T_
`
`0‘O
`
`N0
`
`l0
`
`0
`020
`
`025
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`j_L_LJ__l_.I_L_g
`05
`L0
`030
`WAVELENGTH (pm)
`
`Fig. 5. SEM micrographs of high resolution line/space test pat-
`terns defined in the AZ/Si/PMMA system over i am high topog-
`Fig. 4. Transmission spectrum of a 1” nm thick film at hydro-
`raphy. A: Equal
`'l
`,urn line/space features in AZI3501 and Si ob-
`genated amorphous silicon deposited by plasma CVD of a silane/
`tained by electron beam exposure followed by RIE etching of Si. B:
`helium mixture on a quartz (suprasil) substrate. The film is trans-
`Same pattern alter deep u.v. exposure and development of PMMA
`parent in the visible region with a peak at 620 nm and is totally
`2 pro thick. C: Same as 3 showing vertical sidewalls of PMMA
`opaque below 400 nm. Similar spectra are exhibited by films as thin
`crossing over an oxide step i ,um high. D: Equal 0.75 pm line/space
`features similar to C.
`as 20 not including those obtained by electron-gun evaporation.
`Downloaded on 2017-06-19 to IP 65207.22 addrm. Reddribution subject to £08 terms of use (see ecsdl.orysitdterms use) unles CC License in phoe (see distract).
`
`

`

`Vol. 130, No. 2
`
`THREE-LAYER RESIST SYSTEM
`
`481
`
`and 1 uni/1 um were obtained by RE of PMMA in an
`oxygen plasma as shown in Fig. 6.
`The RIE and deep u.v. patterning techniques were
`equally capable of generating uniform resist features
`with good linewidth control, quasi-vertical sidewalls,
`and high aspect ratio over 1 pm topography as illus-
`trated inFig. 2, 5, and 6. Such patterns are highly de-
`sirable for subtractive and additive processes in VLSI
`fabrication The differences between the RIE and deep
`u.v. patterning techniques were mainly determined by
`the characteristics of the planarizing layer as dis-
`cussed below.
`
`RIE' Dafleffliflgv—RIE processing was more toler-
`ant of variations in thicknms and composition of the
`planarizing layer by virtue of the anisotropy of RISE,
`and the high etch rate of organic resist materials rela-
`tive to Si in an oxygen plasma. Radiation sensitivity of
`the planarizing layer was also not a requirement in
`BE processing. The selection of useful organic coat-
`ings was,
`therefore, wider, and the processing flex-
`ibility, for example with respect to high-temperature
`baking and thermal cycling, was greater than deep u.v.
`processing.
`Undesirable resist residues, which appeared on sur-
`faces after etching by RE, were removed by a clean-
`ing procedure such as dip-etching in dilute HF solu-
`tion. Figure 7 illustrates the effectiveness of the HF
`dip-etching technique in cleaning 01! all traces of resi-
`dues from RIB-patterned surfaces. Where exposure to
`HF was incompatible with the materials on the water
`surface, alternate cleaning procedures were used in
`conjunction with modified RLE conditions. Potential
`contamination from metals sputtered from the sub-
`strate holder and radiation damage from energetic pho-
`tons could be drawbacks in some applications, but their
`
`
`
`Fig. 6. SEM micrographs of line/space patterns defined in the
`AZ/Si/PMMA three-layer system over 0.8 um high topography. Top:
`Line/space pattern 1 urn/0.5 1.1m obtained by RIE of PMMA 2.5'um
`thick. Bottom: Similar pattern with line/space features ‘I inn/l pm.
`Decrease in linewidth is less than 0.1 pm.
`
`
`
`I m
`’1'
`
`t——1
`Info
`
`Fig. 7. SEM micrographs of patterns defined in c PMMA film 2
`.um thick by ME in oxygen. Resist residues on etched surfaces were
`cleaned off by clip etching in buffered HF for 10-15 sec. A,C: After
`RIE. B,D: After cleaning.
`
`efiects could be eliminated or minimized by adjusting
`RISE conditions (47).
`
`Deep u.v. patterning.—In deep u.v. patterning, resist
`residues seldom appeared after solvent development
`of adequately exposed PMMA. Residues tended to ap-
`pear when the overall PMMA thickness was excessive,
`or the thickness variation over steps was large. This
`could be attributed to the strong attenuation of the
`deep u.v. intensity in thick layers, resulting from the
`strong absorption of PMMA in the spectral region be-
`tween 200-260 nm (42). As the solubility of PMMA was
`a strong function of the energy absorbed, the attenu-
`ation from top to bottom of thick PMMA layers re-
`sulted in a corresponding decrease in development rate.
`This phenomenon influenced residue-formation, as well
`as the cross-sectional profile and aspect ratio of resist
`features. Where PMMA thickness variations due to to-
`pography were large, development in chlorobenzene
`resulted in better linewidth control
`than undiluted
`MIBK Development in chlorobenzene could also be
`used to retain the top imaging resist film, and generate
`a three-layer structure which is potentially uSeful in
`lift—QR applications (49-51). Similar structures could
`also be generated by RIE using a top imaging resist
`film which is stable in an oxygen plasma.
`An advantage of the deep u.v. patterning process
`was its relative insensitivity to pinholes or cracks in
`the barrier layer when the top imaging film was intact
`and opaque in the deep-u.v. In the absence or the Si
`barrier layer, a film of AZISSOJ photoresist 0.3 um
`thick is sufficient to block deep u.v. radiation from ex-
`posing the PMMA layer
`(4). Despite the infinite
`solubility of exposed PMMA relative to silicon,
`the
`maximum useful thickness of PMMA was limited to
`8 pm due to the severe attenuation of the deep u.v. in-
`tensity,’and the tendency of thicker layers to crack
`after baking or pattern development.
`
`Film integrity.—4uccessful patterning of the AZ/Si/
`PMMA system required careful optimization of the film
`thicknesses and the experimental conditions which af-
`fected the integrity of the 3 layers. In particular, the
`stress, the adhesion, and defect levels in one layer af-
`fected directly the integrity of the two other layers
`during processing. The film characteristics and the pro-
`cessing toleranCes varied with the horizontal and verti-
`cal geometry ot the underlying topography.
`
`DMIIoaded on 2017-06-19 to IP 65207.22 addrm. Minion subject to £06 terms of use (see ecsdl.orysiteltenns use) unless 00 License in place (see wad).
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`482
`
`J. Electrochem. 5°C.: SOLID-STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
`
`February 1983
`
`films deposited by
`Hydrogenated amorphous Si
`plasma CVD often formed blisters (Fig. 8) on poorly
`planariaed PMMA surfaces. Such blister formation was
`presumably due to excessive stress induced in theSi
`film by the underlying topography. Silicon films de-
`posited at room temperature by electron gun evapora-
`tion were more susceptible to loss of adhesion than
`plasma CVD Si films. The evaporated films were more
`specular and uniform, resulting in better defined pat-
`terns. The etching and deep u.v. blocking character-
`istics of evaporated and CVD films were identical.
`Poorly adhering and highly stressed silicon films often
`cracked and peeled after the imaging layer was pat-
`terned. Deposition above room temperature and an-
`nealing of the films prior to the application or the top
`imaging layer alleviated this problem. Similar be-
`havior was observed with evaporated films of A1 and
`Ti used as barrier layers between PMMA and A21350J.
`The thickness of the top imaging resist layer and the
`baking conditions also influenced the integrity of the
`silicon barrier layer. Resist films 50.5 m thick baked
`
`
`
`
`i——l
`
`5pm
`
`at about 100°C were readily processed over a wide
`range of PMMA and Si film thicknesses. Good step cov-
`erage and adequate planarization were essential to ob-
`tain a uniformly thick imaging layer. Inadequate pla-
`narization resulted in variations in thickness of the
`imaging layer with conaponding variations in line-
`width and profile geometry. Multiple reflections at the
`resist-silicon interface also contribute to linewidth va-
`riations in the case of optically exposed patterns. The
`efiect is clearly illustrated in Fig. 9 which shows the
`systematic variation in linewidth of 5 parallel resist
`lines nominally 2 m wide crossing over 2 raised oxide
`steps 1 m thick and 2 m wide.
`
`Plana'rization.—Due to the importance of the pla-
`narizing function of PMMA. an empirical evaluation of
`the coating characteristics of a variety of films was
`made using single and multiple coatings on stepped
`surfaces. Oxidized wafers, with sets of periodic line/
`space structures 2.5-25 am wide, were coated by con-
`ventional resist spinning and baking methods. The un-
`dulations of the resist surface profile conforming to the
`substrate topography were scanned with a mechanical
`stylus to determine the planarization or leveling ac-
`complished by a coating layer.
`The curves in Fig. 10 show the peak-to-valley am-
`plitude of the resist surface profile covering surface
`steps 0.8 m high. The degree of planarization, repre-
`sented by the amplitude, varied with the molecular
`weight of PMMA, the thickness and number of PMMA
`layers, the line/space dimensions of the substrate top-
`ography, and their periodicity or pitch. As the average
`molecular weight of PMMA decreased, the amplitude
`of the surface undulations decreased indicating en-
`hanced planarization. This effect is illustrated in Fig.
`10(a) with three PMMA compositions of average mo-
`lecular weight 500,000, 150,000, and 33,000. The films
`were nominally 2 pm thick coated on sets of parallel
`steps 5 m wide and varying pitch.
`The expected improvement in planarization with in-
`creasing PMMA thickness is illustrated in Fig. 10(b)
`for the same sets of steps 5 m wide and 0.8 um high.
`The amplitude of the surface undulations also pro-
`gressively decreased as the number of PMMA layers
`increased. It is interesting to note that better planar-
`
`
`
`Fig. 8. Hydrogenated amorphous silicon films 100 "In thick de-
`posited on PMMA at room temperature. Blisters indicative of corn-
`prestive stress in the film are randomly distributed on the surface.
`Top: Single blister after film deposition. Bottom: Appearance of
`blister after patterning.
`Downloaded on 2017-06-19 to IP
`
`lines that run from
`Fig. 9. Linewidth variation of PMMA resist
`top to bottom of the micrograph traversing two i
`inn high Si°2
`steps. Narrowing at the resist line: occurs at the top of the steps
`where the resist is thinnest.
`address. Redistribution stbjecl to ECS terms of use (see
`
`) unless OC license in place (see abstrad).
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

` (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12)
`
`
`
`65.207.2.2Downloaded on 2017-06-19 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract). 
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`65.207.2.2Downloaded on 2017-06-19 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract). 
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket