`By: Nicholas C. Kliewer (nkliewer@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Justin B. Kimble (JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`v.
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,850
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS
`TO PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`Patent 9,083,850
`Pursuant to the Board’s Order of August 25, 2017, Patent Owner Securus
`
`Technologies, Inc. (“Patent Owner” or “Securus”) files these objections to
`
`Petitioner’s oral argument demonstratives previously served on Patent Owner.
`
`Objection No. 1 (to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide 9)
`
`Patent Owner objects to Slide 9 because it misrepresents the arguments
`
`made by Petitioner, contains new arguments that were not previously presented in
`
`any paper before the Board, and mischaracterizes Patent Owner’s arguments from
`
`the Response.
`
`Objection No. 2 (to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide 13)
`
`Patent Owner objects to Slide 13 because it mischaracterizes Patent Owner’s
`
`arguments from the Response.
`
`Objection No. 3 (to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide 16)
`
`Patent Owner objects to Slide 16 because it misrepresents the arguments
`
`made by Petitioner and contains new arguments that were not previously presented
`
`in any paper before the Board.
`
`Objection No. 4 (to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide 38)
`
`Patent Owner objects to Slide 38 because it misrepresents the arguments
`
`made by Petitioner and contains new arguments that were not previously presented
`
`to the Board.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`Patent 9,083,850
`Objection No. 5 (to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides 59-60)
`
`Patent Owner objects to Slides 59-60 because they misrepresent the
`
`arguments made by Petitioner and contain new arguments that were not previously
`
`presented to the Board.
`
`Objection No. 6 (to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide 64)
`
`Patent Owner objects to Slide 64 because it misrepresents the arguments
`
`made by Petitioner and contains new arguments that were not previously presented
`
`to the Board.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 11, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nicholas C. Kliewer
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 72,480
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`Patent 9,083,850
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this document has been served via
`
`electronic mail on September 11, 2017, to Petitioner via counsel, Michael D. Specht,
`
`at mspecht-PTAB@skgf.com and Joseph E. Mutschelknaus, at
`
`jmutsche-
`
`PTAB@skgf.com, and PTAB@SKGF.com, pursuant to Petitioner’s consent in its
`
`Petition at p. 60.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nicholas C. Kliewer
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 72,480
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`