`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: January 12, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC., HTC CORPORATION,
`HTC AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-00757
`Case IPR2016-01345
`Patent 7,881,236 B2
`_______________
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON, PETER P. CHEN, and
`TERRENCE W. McMILLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
` ORDER
` Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00757
`IPR2016-01345
`Patent 7,881,236 B2
`
`Introduction
`On January 10, 2017, the initial conference call was held among
`counsel for the respective parties and Judges Saindon, Chen, and McMillin.
`We provide the following summary of the conference call.
`Schedule
`The parties indicated they have no current issues with the Scheduling
`Order (Paper 15 in the -00757 IPR). The parties may not stipulate to any
`changes to Due Dates 6 or 7 in the Scheduling Order without specific
`authorization from us.
`
`Motions
`Neither party filed a list of proposed motions prior to the conference.
`The parties are reminded that Board authorization generally is required
`before filing a motion. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(b). A party seeking to file a
`motion not authorized previously should request a conference call with us to
`obtain authorization to file the motion.
` Oral Hearing in San Jose
`The parties agreed to hold the August 2017 oral hearing in these IPRs
`at the USPTO offices in San Jose, California.
`Other Matters
`The parties provided an update on related matters and on settlement
`status.
`As of this date, no protective order has been entered. The parties are
`reminded of the requirement for a protective order when filing a motion to
`seal. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. If the parties choose to propose a protective order
`other than or departing from the default Standing Protective Order, Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, App. B (Aug. 14, 2012),
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00757
`IPR2016-01345
`Patent 7,881,236 B2
`
`they must submit a joint, proposed protective order, accompanied by a red-
`lined version based on the default protective order in Appendix B to the
`Board’s Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, and must explain why each
`proposed change to the default Standing Protective Order is necessary. See
`id. at 48,769–71.
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00757
`IPR2016-01345
`Patent 7,881,236 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Charles M. McMahon
`Hersh H. Mehta
`McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
`cmcmahon@mwe.com
`hmehta@mwe.com
`
`Stephen S. Korniczky
`Martin Bader
`Ericka J. Schulz
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP
`skorniczky@sheppartmullin.com
`mbader@sheppardmullin.com
`eschulz@sheppardmullin.com
`
`James M. Glass
`Kevin P.B. Johnson
`Todd M. Briggs
`John T. McKee
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Cyrus A. Morton
`Ryan M. Schultz
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`CMorton@robinskaplan.com
`RSchultz@robinskaplan.com
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
