throbber
2-L‘
`(.J‘I
`C©
`_;>.
`(D
`
`C:
`
`Q,
`
`.~
`
`.»
`
`i
`
`.__
`'*_—‘____
`._*__.'‘
`_$-_j-'1:
`O24:
`or’
`O-_—;
`03%J
`E
`
`J_
`
`PTO/SBl05 (08-08)1
`'
`Approved for use through 06/30/2010. OMB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`V
`Under the Paerwork Reduction Act of 1995 no ersons are re uired to resond to a collection of information unless it disla s a valid OMB control number.
`uT|L|Ty A
`PATENT APPLICATION
`TR/-‘\NSM|TTAL
` (Only for new nonprovisional applications under 37 CFR 1.53(b))
`
`U.S. PTO
`12/285887
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘.-
`
`. APPLICATION ELEMENTS
`See MPEP chapter 600 concerning utility patent application contents.
`
`Aooness To:
`
`er for Patents
`'
`'
`C
`p.‘2>"T'e§‘;is#‘2';o
`Aiexand,-ia \./A 2231 3.1 450
`
`1. |:] Fee Transmittal Form (e.g., PTOlSBl17)
`
`AccoMpANy|NG AppL|cAT|oN pARTs
`
`3.
`
`21:] Applicant claims small entity status.
`See 37 CFR 121
`23
`[Total Pages
`Specification
`Both the claims and abstract must start on a new page
`(Forinlormalion on the preferred arrangement, see MPEP 608.01(a))
`4. Drawing(s) (35 U.S.C. 113)
`[Total Sheets
`1
`
`1
`[Total Sheets
`5. Oath or Declaration
`a. I Newly executed (original or copy)
`b.
`A copy from a prior application (37 CFR 1.63(d))
`for continuation/divisional with Box 18 completed)
`DELETION OF |NVENTOR[S[
`Signed stilemenl attalched deleting;-gie:r§°r(s)
`name int eprior app ication, see
`1.63(d)(2)and1'33(b)'
`_
`
`l.
`
`'6. E] Application Data Sheet. See 37 CFR 1.76
`71:] CD-ROM or CD-R in duplicate, large table or
`P
`A
`d
`.
`E::‘ed;c;§)(E;aa'g}e(°r€’g:f3"
`"0
`
`8. Nucleotide andlor Amino Acid Sequence Submission
`(if applicable, items a. — c. are required)
`a. [:] Computer Readable Form (CRF)
`_ b.
`specification Sequence Listing on:
`
`9. '3 Assignment Papers (cover sheet 8- document(s))
`
`Name of Assignee
`
`1o_ E] 37 cFR 3,73(b) statement
`(when there is an assignee)
`
`|:]Power of
`Attorney
`
`11_ B English Translation Document (if applicable)
`
`12. |:] lnfofition Disclosure Statement (PTO/SBI08 or PTO-1449)
`0 -
`f may
`it
`h d
`opleso Cl
`Ionsa ac e
`
`13_
`
`Prenminary Amendment
`
`.
`.
`.
`14. E] Return Receipt Postcard (MPEP 503)
`(Should be specifically itemized)
`
`15 D ceftifie‘! c°P¥ 9f P'i°'i_tV D°°“"‘°"t(5)
`(’f f°’e’9” P”°”tY '5 °/a”'"ed)
`
`. D Nonpublication Request under 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(i).
`Applicant must attach form PTO/SB/35 or equivalent.
`
`i. D CD-ROM or CD-R (2 copies); or
`“_ D paper
`
`17. mothers
`
`c; D Statements verifying identity of above copies
`18. If a CONTINUING APPLICATION, check appropriate box, and supply the requisite information below and in the first sentence of the
`specification following the title, or in an Application Data Sheet under 37 CFR 1. 76:
`
`Continuation
`Prior application information:
`
`[3 Continuation-in-part(ClP)
`I: Divisional
`Examiner San Ming R. Hui
`
`of prior application No.: 10/812184............... ..
`
`Art Unit: 1617
`
`'19. CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`
`—A———
`_.%Ki —
`
`Name
`
`_l7
`
`Registration No.
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.53(b). The inlormation is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the
`USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to
`complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any
`comments on the amount of time you require to complete this lorrn and/or suggestions for reducing this burden. should be sent to the Chief Information Officer,
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Department ol Commerce, PO Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED
`FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, PO. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`Z70635
`
`-1-
`
`FORMULATION
`
`The _invention relates to a novel sustained release pharmaceutical formulation adapted
`
`for administration by injection containing the compound
`‘7oc—[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3,5(l0)-triene-3,1713-diol, more
`particularly to a formulation adapted for administration by injection containing the compound
`7oc-[9-(4,4,5 ,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra- 1,3,5( l 0)-triene-3, 17B,-diol in
`solution in a ricinoleate vehicle which additionally comprises at least one alcohol and a non- »
`
`' aqueous ester solvent which is miscible in the ricinoleate vehicle. »
`
`10
`
`Oestrogen deprivation is fimdamental to the treatment of many benign and malignant
`diseases of the breast and reproductive tract. In premenopausal women, this is achieved by
`the ablation of ovarian function through surgical, radiotherapeutic, or medical means, and, in
`‘postmenopausal’women,_by the use
`aromataseinhibitorsi
`V
`9
`i
`9
`V
`if
`1
`I
`A
`9
`it
`
`An alternative approach to oestrogen withdrawal is to antagonise oestrogens with
`_ antioestrogens. These are drugs that bind to and compete for oestrogen receptors (BR) present
`
`15.
`
`in the nuclei of oestrogen-responsive tissue. Conventional nonsteroidal antioestrogens,'such
`
`as tamoxifen, compete efficiently for ER binding but their effectiveness is often limited by the
`
`partial agonism they display, which results in an incomplete blockade of oestrogen-mediated
`
`activity.(Furr and Jordan 1984, May and Westley 1987).
`
`20
`
`I
`
`25
`
`The potential for nonsteroidal antioestrogens to display agonistic properties prompted 9
`
`the search for novel compounds that would bind ER with high affinity without activating any
`
`of the normal transcriptional-hormone responses and consequent manifestations of oestrogens.
`Such molecules would be “pure” antioestrogens, clearly distinguished from tamoxifen‘-like
`ligands and capable of eliciting complete ablation of the trophic effects of oestrogens. Such _
`
`compounds are referred to as Estrogen Receptor—Downregulators (E.R.D.). The rationale for
`
`the ‘design and testing of novel, pure’ antioestrogens has been described in: Bowler et al'1989,
`
`V
`Wakeling 1990a, 1990b, 1990c. Wakeling and Bowler 1987, 1988.
`Steroidal analogues of oestradiol, with an alkylsulphinyl side chain in the 70L position,
`
`provided the first examples of compounds devoid of oestrogenic activity (Bowler et al 1989).
`
`30
`
`One of these, 7oL-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoroperityl sulphinyl)nonyl]o'estra-1,3,5-(10)triene-
`
`3,17[3-diol was selected for intensive study on the basis of its pure oestrogen antagonist
`
`activity and significantly increased antioestrogenic potency over other available
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 2
`
`

`
`Z70635
`
`;-v<-
`\._r'
`
`.
`
`[,5
`(N .’
`
`-2-
`
`antioestrogens. In vitro findings and early clinical experience with
`
`70.-[9—(4,4,5 ,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3-5(10)—triene-3,l7[3-diol have
`promoted interest in the development of the drug as a therapeutic agent for oestrogen-
`
`dependent indications such as breast cancer and certain benign gynaecological conditions.
`70L-[9-(4,4,5,5,.5—Pentafluoropentylsu1phinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3-5(l0)-triene-3,17[3-diol,
`or ICI 182,780, has been allocated the international noun-proprietary namefulvestrant, which is
`used hereinafter. When referring to fulvestrant we include pharmaceutically—acceptable salts
`thereof and any possible solvates of either thereof.
`‘
`_
`Fulvestrant binds to ER with‘ an affinity similar to that of oestradiol and completely
`blocks the growth stimulatory action of oestradiol on human breast cancer cells in vitro; it is
`
`more potent and more effective than tamoxifen in this respect. Fulvestrant blocks completely
`
`the uterotrophic action of oestradiol in rats, mice and monkeys, and also blocks the
`activity of tamoxifen.‘
`
`i
`
`' Because fulvestrant has none of the oestrogen-like stimulatory activity that is
`E
`characteristic of clinicallylavailable antioestrogensusuch as tamoxifen or torernifene, it may
`offer improved therapeutic activity characterised by more rapid, complete, or longer-lasting
`tumour regression; a lower incidence or rateof development ofresistance to treatment; and a
`reduction oftumour invasiveness.
`I
`I
`V
`In intact adult rats, fulvestrant achieves maximum regression of the uterus at a dose
`which does not adversely affect bone density or lead to increased gonadotrophin secretion. If
`also true in humans, these findin_gs__.could be of extreme importance clinically. iReduced bone
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`density limits the duration of oestrogen-ablative treatment for endometriosis. Fulvestrant does
`
`. not block hypothalamic ER. Oestrogen ablation also causes. or exacerbates hot flushes and
`
`other menopausal symptoms; fulvestrant will not cause such effects because it does not cross
`the blood-brain barrier.
`
`25
`
`European Patent Application No. 0 138 504 discloses that certain steroid derivatives
`
`are effective antioestrogenic agents. The disclosure includes information relating to the
`
`preparation of the steroid derivatives. In particularthere is the disclosure within Example 35
`of the compound 70:-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-
`.
`
`30
`
`1,3,5(10)-triene-3,l7[3-diol, which compound is specifically named in Claim 4. It is also
`
`disclosed that the compounds of that invention may be provided for use in the form of a\
`
`pharmaceutical composition comprising a steroid derivative of the invention together with a
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 3
`
`

`
`z7o63s
`
`b
`
`i
`
`I
`
`A
`
`Y(“,'
`
`-3-
`
`pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier. It is stated therein that the composition can be
`in a form suitable for oral or parenteral administration.
`A
`i
`Fulvestrant shows, along with other steroidal based compounds, certain physical
`
`5
`
`properties which make formulation of these compounds difficult. Fulvestrant is a particularly
`lipophilic molecule, even when compared with other steroidal compounds, and its aqueous
`solubility is extremely low at around 10 ngml" (this is an estimate from a water/solvent
`
`mixture-solute ‘since measurements this low could not be achieved in a water only solute).
`Currently there are a numberof sustained release injectable steroidal formulations
`which have been commercialised. Commonly these formulations use oil as a solvent a.nd
`10’ wherein additional excipients may be present. Below in Table 1 are described a few
`. commercialised sustained release injectable formulations;
`In the formulations within Table 1 a number of different oils are used to solubilise the
`- compound and additional excipientswsuch as benzyl benzoate, benzyl alcohol "and ethanol have
`been used. Volumes of oil needed to solubilise the steroid active ingredient are low. Extended
`
`15
`
`release is achievable for periods from 1 to 8 weeks.
`
`20
`
`-25
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 4
`
`

`
`OZBOQ
`
`£83m
`
`xuu>:v
`
`goo?—.
`
`EN8_
`
`cm2m~
`
`2:.
`
`:05$5
`
`,_la
`
`I.m95.:uom..
`
`.53
`
`mEoS<
`
`25E2
`
`_sea
`
`8e..%so
`
`
`
` .£200
`
`S530
`
`:2.
`
`250
`
`_€.._.>.35
`
`.$2
`
`xa.=E.2E.
`
`8.30
`
`gun:m<
`
`32.%so
`
`new
`
`m:.:u__um
`
`om
`
`gem
`
`u.S._o
`
`¢32
`
`22>.35
`§E8u__.w
`
`8.83m
`
`E:
`
`mm;
`
`.930
`sac:3.
`
`xuoa
`
`E:
`
`:83_
`
`N-.~
`
`8.83.
`
`.8_
`
`_EN3H_EN
`
`
`
`me,.
`
`mEo2<
`ES.35
`
`,
`
`8.30
`22>.35_mma_
`
`§__.%so
`
`32
`
`_omm=wm
`
`=o_:=E
`
`mm>
`
`.530
`
`_aE>.85
`
`.wccfiom
`
`33
`
`on
`
`.85
`
`.om
`
`
`
`mz.oa.uE.z_m3:um:2$:.z_Dz:.U<-OZOJQHm<mA~O-Ho_._«,—.
`
`
`
`
`
`£85
`
`Smo€:<
`M52
`
`.was
`
`comoaomoi
`_._sw_=%~
`
`mice
`
`9.52
`
`=o.wo.mum8m
`Tmega.
`
`E32
`
`mfiom
`
`mean
`
`M52
`
`meow
`
`mfiow
`
`wntusum
`ofifiooubuou
`
`macs
`
`__...m28me._
`
`Eeém
`
`“.322
`
`u=Eo_Eoao=o.28.8._.
`
`2:zozfimsm
`
`
`
`28a8om_u=o§8.mo._.
`
`
`
`28:83o=o.28.m£.
`
`
`
`u:o§8woEbnoéam
`
`o.a=o_EoE_.€o:m
`
`o:3nS§_
`
`o=o.2mo.8._.
`
`ZO._.DAO~E
`
`Same
`
`u=88muwo.axxofixm
`
`zfimmoouoe
`
`2§23we._
`
`22:25
`
`u.8Eo.E_E.o.m
`_o§Eooo.r-d
`mzBomo=._oE..
`
`
`
`88:8uu::o:o_2u§z
`
`u=o§mow8§xo.P£
`
`o=o§.u..E.2oZ
`
`28=aE2_
`
`Saoficanoo
`
`bémemaoz
`
`u:o§momo.§xo._.P:._
`
`
`
`oaoamo.
`
`2_e....3moaaxoaiz
`
`mzommemmoofi
`
`2m._u_a>-a-2_o€.Emm
`
`z.<z:=><xo
`
`BSES
`
`925%
`
`8moN:un8EEuxB_
`
`_o§E...m
`
`,:E,5moz>o
`
`dmzmm
`
`mE
`
`mmoo
`
`
`eommem
` m2<z
`Sago”;
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 5
`
`

`
`3303N
`.52mam...
`
`we:
`
`
`
`fi§<.32>
`
`.85
`
`32
`
`9%
`
`o\..~
`
`:8
`
`89.
`
`§.3
`
`.230
`
`ea29.
`
`mm»
`
`mm»
`
`.230
`
`._§__..:
`
`Sm
`
`d__.==E_H5.E2
`
`#3:
`
`¢8:.sm
`awQR
`
`mE.muz
`
`mzm
`
`=uwo€=<MEE.
`
`
`
`._o_..§m_.__=wao~
`
`_.a.m=§.
`
`u:o_on=2._.
`
`z<._om<x<._
`
`_o__._§m
`
`u::o_a>
`
`zmoofimmdo
`
`msa
`
`
`
`Emobmowoi_._EwEom~
`
`53.2=-N._
`
`oaohzmomoa
`
`z:.35mo
`
`38$
`
`
`
`_o_§_%§_£umoum%8__B_§_Bu£5ofifimm295aEocb.uo.._u@2388mmo§Exo:Em_.can33Ba.x..w_§>2aSo_§ou22>.35_...§%umom.
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 6
`
`

`
`z7o_635
`
`C T
`
`8
`
`-5-
`
`Cl
`
`described which comprises 50mg of fu1vestrant,.400mg of benzyl alcohol and sufficient castor
`
`0 oil to bring the solution to a volume of _1 ml. Manufacture at a commercial scale of a
`formulation as described in US 5,183,814 willbe complicated by the high alcohol
`concentration. Therefore, there is a need to lower the alcohol concentration in fulvestrant
`formulations whilst preventing precipitation of fulvestrant from the formulation.
`
`Table 2 shows the solubility of fulvestrant in a number of different solvents.
`
`Table 2 - SOLUBILITY OF FULVESTRANT
`
`SOLVENT
`
`Water '
`
`A}aéhfs' oil ’
`
`Sesameoil
`
`Castor oil
`
`Miglyol 810
`
`Miglyo1812
`
`Ethyl oleate _
`
`Benzyl benzoate
`
`Isopropyl myristate
`
`Span as (surfactant)
`Ethanol
`A
`
`' Benzyl Alcohol
`
`10
`
`SOLUBILITY
`
`(mgml" at 25°C)
`0.001 .
`
`0.45
`
`'
`
`0.58
`
`20
`
`3.06
`
`V2.72
`
`1.25 b
`
`6.15
`
`0.80
`
`3.79
`>200
`
`>200
`
`As can be seen fulvestrant is significantly more soluble in castor oil than any of the
`
`other oils tested. The greater solvating ability of castor oil for steroidal compounds is known
`
`and is attributed to the high number of hydroxygroups of ricinoleic acid, which is the major
`
`H’ constituent of the fatty acids within the triglycerides present in-castor oil - see (Riffkin et.al. J.
`
`15
`
`Pharm. Sci., (1964), 53, 89l).
`
`However, even when using the best oil based solvent, castor oil, we have found that it
`
`is not possible to dissolve fulvestrant invan oil based solvent alone so as to achieve a
`
`enough concentration to dose a patient in a low volume injection and achieve a therapeutically
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 7
`
`

`
`Z70635
`
`C
`
`I
`
`J
`
`.
`
`-7-
`
`significant release rate. To achieve a therapeutically significant release rate the amount of ‘
`
`fulvestrant needed would require the formulation volume to be large, at least 10 ml. This
`requires the doctor to inject an excessively large volume of formulation to administer a‘ dose
`
`significantly high enough for human therapy.
`
`Currently guidelines recommend that no more than 5mls_ of liquid is injected
`intraniuscularly in a single injection. Pharmacologically active doses required for a 1 month
`
`long acting depot formulation of fulvestrant is around 250mg. Therefore, when dissolved in
`
`just castor oil, fulvestrant would need to be administered in at least 10ml of castor oil.
`
`The addition of organic solvents in_ which fulvestrant is freely soluble, and which are
`
`10 miscible with castor oil, may be used, such as an alcohol. With -the addition of high
`
`concentrations of analcohol concentrations of >50mgml",of fulvestrant in a castor oil
`
`below.
`formulation is achievable, thereby giving an injection volumes of <5ml - see Table
`-We have surprisingly found that the introduction of ai non-aqueous ester solvent which is
`miscible in the castor oil and an alcohol surprisingly eases the solubilisation of fulvestrant into
`a concentration of at least 50 mgml’l - see Table 3 below. The finding is surprising since the
`
`15
`
`-
`
`solubility of fulvestrant in non-aqueous ester solvents - see Table 2 above - is significantly
`lower than the solubilitynof fulvestrant in an alcohol. The solubility of fiilvestrant is also lower
`— in non-aqueous ester solvents than is the solubility of fulvestrant in castor oil.
`
`Therefore, we present as a feature of the invention a pharmaceutical formulation g
`20 comprising fulvestrant (preferably fulvestrant is present at 3-l0%w/v, 4-9%w/v, 4-8%w/v,
`'4-7%'w/v, 4-6%w/v and most preferably at about 5%w/v) in a ricinoleate vehicle, a
`' pharmaceutically acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent, and a pharmaceutically acceptable
`alcohol wherein the formulation is adapted for intramuscular administration and attaining a
`therapeutically significant blood plasma fulvestrant concentration for at least 2 weeks.
`Another feature of the invention is a pharmaceutical formulation comprising
`fulvestrant in which the formulation is adapted for intra-muscular injection into a human and
`
`25
`
`which is capable after injection of attaining a therapeutically significant blood plasma
`fulvestrant concentration for at least 2 weeks.
`I
`i
`
`Further features of the invention include a pharmaceutical formulation adapted for
`
`30
`
`intra-muscular injection comprising fulvestrant, 30% or less weight of a pharmaceutically-
`
`acceptable alcohol per volume of formulation, at least 1% weight of a pharmaceutically-
`
`~
`
`acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent miscible in a ricinoleate vehicle per volume of
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 8
`
`

`
`270635
`
`5
`
`(MiMa,-
`
`-3-
`
`formulation and a sufficient amount of-a ricinoleate vehicle so as to prepare a formulation.
`
`which is capable after injection of attaining a therapeutically significant blood plasma
`
`fulvestrant concentration for at least 2 weeks.
`
`Further features of the invention include a pharmaceutical formulation adapted for
`intra-muscular injection comprising fulvestrant; 35% (preferably 30% and ideally 25%) or less
`
`5
`
`weight of a pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol per volume of formulation, at least 1% i
`
`(preferably at least 5% or ideally 10%) weight of a pharmaceutically-acceptable non—aqueous
`ester solvent miscible within a ricinoleate vehicle per volume of formulation and a sufficient
`
`amount of a ricinoleate vehicle so as to prepare a formulation of at least 45mgrn1" of
`fulvestrant.
`I
`I
`5
`
`ii
`
`10
`
`For the avoidance of any doubt when using the term % weight per volume of
`
`formulation for the constituents of the formulation we mean that within a unit volume of the
`formulation '5‘ certain puercentageuoif the "co.nsti’tu'eri't_ by Weight‘ will be present, ‘for_exa_mple a_
`
`1% weight per volume formulation will contain within a 100ml volume of formulation lg of
`the constituent. By way of further illustration
`
`15
`
`
`
`Preferred pharmaceutical formulations of the invention are as described above
`
`wherein:
`
`20
`
`1.
`
`The total volume of the formulation is 6m1, or less, and the concentration of
`
`fulvestrant is at least 45mgrnl“ .
`
`2.
`
`The total amount of fulvestrant in the formulation is 250mg, or more, and the total
`
`volume of the formulation is 6ml, or less.
`3.
`The total amount of fiilvestrant in the formulation is 250mg and the total volume of
`
`25
`
`the formulation is 5-5.25m].
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 9
`
`

`
`Z70635
`
`C;
`
`It is appreciated that in the formulation an excess of formulation may be included to
`allow the attendant physician or care giver to be able to deliver the required dose. Therefore,
`when a Sml dose is required it would be appreciated that an excess of up to 0.25ml, preferably
`
`up to O.15rnl will also be present in theformulation. Typically the formulation will be
`
`presented in a vial or a prefilled syringe, preferably a prefilled syringe, containing a unit
`
`dosage of the formulation as described herein, these being further features of the invention.
`
`1 Preferred concentrations of a pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol present in any of the
`' aboveformulations are; at least 3%w/v, at-least 5%w/v, at least 7%w/v, at least 10% w/v, at I
`_
`‘least 11% w/v, at least 12% w/v, at least 13% w/v, at least 14% w/v, at least 15% w/v and,
`preferably, at least 16% w/v. Preferred maximal concentrations of pharmaceutically-
`acceptable alcohol present in the formulation are ;28% w/v or less, 22% w/v or less and 20%
`w/v or less.. Preferred ranges of pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol present in any of the
`above-forrnulationsare’ selected from any minimum or maximum. value described above and 1
`preferably are; 3-35%w/v, 4-35%w/v, 5_—35%w/v, 5-i32%w/v, 7-32%w/V, 10-30%w/v, 12-
`28%w/v, 15-25%w/v, 17-23%w/v, 18-22‘%w/v and ideally ~19-2l%w/v.”
`I
`The pharmaceutically-acceptable alcoholmay consist of one alcohol or a mixture of
`two or more alcohols, preferably a mixture of two alcohols. Preferred pharmaceutically-
`
`I
`
`N
`
`10
`
`15
`
`acceptable alcohols for parenteral administration are ethanol, benzyl alcohol or a mixture of
`both ethanol and benzyl alcohol, preferably the ethanol and benzyl alcohol are present in the I
`formulation in the same w/v amounts. Preferably the formulation alcohol contains 10% w/v
`1 ethanol and 10% w/v benzyl alcohol.
`
`20,
`
`' The pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent may consist of one or a
`mixture of two or more pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvents, preferably
`
`just one. A preferred pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent for parenteral
`
`25
`
`administration is selected from benzyl benzoate, ethyl oleate, isopropyl myristate,isopropyl
`
`palrnitate or a mixture of any thereof.
`.
`The ricinoleate vehicle should preferably be present in .the formulation in a proportion
`
`of at least 30% weight per volume of the formulation, ideally at least 40% or at least 50%
`
`weight per volume of formulation.
`It will be understood by the skilled person that the pharmaceutically-acceptable
`
`30
`
`alcohol will be_of a quality such that it will meet pharmacopoeial standards (such as are
`
`' described in the US, British, European and Japanese pharmacopoeias) and as such will contain
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 10
`
`

`
`ii z7os35
`
`1
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-10-
`
`_,
`
`some water and possibly other organic solvents, for example ethanol in the US Pharmacopeia
`contains not less than 94.9% by volume and not more than 96.0% by volume of ethanol vvhen
`
`measured at 15.56°C. Dehydrated alcohol in the US Pharmacopeia contains not less than ‘
`
`99.5% ethanol by volume when measured at 15.56°C.
`Preferred concentrations of the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent
`
`present in any of the above formulations are; at least 5% w/v, at least 8% w/v, at least 10%
`
`w/v, at least 11% w/v, at least 12% w/v, at least 13% w/v, at least 15% w/v, at least 16% w/v,
`at least 17% w/v, at least 18% w/v, at least 19% w/v and at least 20% w/v. Preferred maximal
`
`concentrations of the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent are; 60% w/v or
`less, 50%w/v or less, 45% w/v or less, 40% vv/v or less, 35% w/v or less, 30% w/v or less and
`
`10
`
`4 25% w/v or less. A preferred concentration is 15% w/v. Preferred ranges of pharmaceutically-
`
`acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent present in any of the above_ formulations are selected
`from any
`or maximum value described above and preferably are; -5-60%vv/iv, 7-
`55%w/v_, 8-50%w/v, 10-50%w/v, 10-45%vi//v, 10-40%w/V, 10-35%w/v, 10—30%w/v, 10-
`
`25%w/v, 12-25%w/v, 12-22%w/v, 12-20%w/v, 12-1 8%W/V, 13-17%w/pv and ideally 14-
`"16%w/v. Preferably the ester solvent is benzyl benzoate, most preferably at about 15%w/v.
`
`It will be understood by the skilled person that the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-
`
`aqueous ester solvent will be of a quality that it will meet pharmacopoeial standards (such as
`
`_ described in the US, British, European and Japanese pharmacopoeias).
`
`. Preferred combinations of pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol and pharmaceutically-
`
`acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent in the formulation are set out below:
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Pharmaceutically-acceptable
`
`Pbarmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous
`
`a'lcohol(%w/v)
`
`ester (%w/v)
`
`ideally 14-16.
`
`5-60, 7-55, 8-50, 10-50, 10-45, 10-40, 10-35, 10-
`
`30, 10-25, 12-25', 12-22, 12-20, 12-18, 13-17 and
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 11
`
`

`
`Z70635
`
`-11-A
`
`' 5-60, 7-55, 8-50, 10-50, 10-45, 10-40, 10-35, 10-
`
`
`
`30, 10-25, 12-25, 12-22, 12-20, 12-18, 13-17 and
`
`
`
`
`ideally 14-16.
`
` 3-35, 4-35, 5-35, 5-32, 7-32, 10-30, 12-
`28, 15-25, 17-23, 18-22 and ideally 19-
`
`
`
`3-35, 4-35, 5-35, 5-32, 7-32, 10-30, 12-
`
`
`
`
`28, 15-25, 17-23, 18-22 and ideally 19-
`
`
`
`21.
`
`
`
` ethanol and benzyl alcohol, most benzyl benzoate, most preferably at about 15%
`preferably each at about 10%
`
`
`
`
`
`By the use of the term ric’i‘r‘1ol'eat'e vehicle ‘we mean’ an oil which has"as a‘ proportion’ (at
`least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or'95% w/v) of its composition as
`triglycerides of ricinoleic acid. The ricinoleate vehicle may be a synthetic oil or conveniently
`
`is castor oil, ideally of pharmacopoeial standards, as described above.
`We have surprisingly found that the above formulations of the invention provide, afier
`intra-muscular injection, satisfactory release of fulvestrant over an extended period of time.
`_ This finding‘ is indeed surprising for the following reasons.
`I
`Previously tested by theiapplicarits have been intra-muscular injections of fulvestrant
`1.
`in the form of an aqueous suspension. -We have found eictensive local tissue irritation at the
`
`injection site as well as a poor release profile. It is believed that the tissue-
`
`A
`
`irritation/inflammation was due to the presence of fulvestrant in the form of solid particles. '
`The release profile appeared to be determined by the extent of inflarnmation/irritation present
`
`at the injection site and this was variable and difficult to control. Also the fulvestrant release
`
`10
`
`15
`
`rate was notsufficiently high to be clinically significant.
`2.
`Our findings fi‘om studies using “C labelled benzyl alcohol show that it dissipates
`rapidly from the injection site and is removed from the body within 24 hours of .
`
`administration.
`A
`It would be expected that ethanol will dissipate at least as quickly, if not more rapidly,
`
`20
`
`from the injection site.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 12
`
`

`
`_z7o635
`
`‘
`
`-12-
`
`It is known that benzyl benzoate is metabolised by conjugation to glycine to form
`
`hippuric acid by the human liver and excreted into the urine — Martindale: The Extra
`Pharmacopoeia 32”’ edition page 1103, and, therefore, it is unlikely that benzyl benzoate,
`
`when used, is present at the injection site during the whole of the extended release period.
`
`We have found that despite the rapid elimination of the additional solubilising
`
`excipients, i.e. the alcohol and pharmaceutically-acceptable non—aqueous ester solvent, fiorri
`
`the formulation vehicle and the site of injection after injection of the formulation, extended
`
`release at therapeutically significant levels of fulvestrant over an extended period can still
`
`achieved by the fonnulation of the invention.
`
`By use of the term “therapeutically significant levels” we mean that blood plasma
`concentrations of at least 2.5 ngml'1,'ideally at least 3 ngrnl'1, at least 8.5 ngml", and up to 12
`
`ngrnl'l of fulvestrant are achieved in the patient. Preferably blood plasma levels shouldbe less
`than l5 n'gml"‘..
`_
`By use of the term “extended release” we mean at least two weeks, at least three
`weeks, and, preferably at least four weeks of continuous release of fulvestrant is achieved. In a
`preferred feature extended release is achieved for 36 days. Preferably extended release of
`fulvestrant is for at least 2- weeks and more preferably for the following periods (weeks)
`2.5-5, 2..5-4, 3-4, 3.5-.4 and most preferably for at least about 4 weeks.
`I
`i
`It will be understood that the attendant physician may wish to administer the
`intramuscular injection as a divided dose, i.-e. a 5ml formulation is sequentially administered
`
`in two separate injections of 2.5m1, this is a further feature of the invention
`Simply solubilising fulvestrant in an oil based liquid formulation is not predictive of a
`good release profile or lack of precipitation of drug after injection at the injection site.
`Table 3 shows the solubility of fulvestrant in a castor oil vehicle additionally \
`
`containing alcohols ethanol and benzyl alcohol with or without benzyl benzoate. The results
`
`clearly show the positive effect of benzyl benzoate on fulvestrant solubility in castor oil,
`despite fulvestrant having a lower solubility in benzyl benzoate than in either alcohol or castor
`
`oil.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 13
`
`

`
`n223.
`
`
`
`
`Uom~H<50moemfi7:>eE:S,_o.mHz$Fmm>.5,._Z0mbnonzmmA>NZHmmoeommma-m«Esp.
`
`>\.$..\..
`
`C2S23
`
`Wm_8§m
`
`223Sm
`
`222
`
`.mmaasm
`
`_28_<
`
`.
`
`
`
`2..Eaom
`
`£3
`
`Baoucom
`
`2:22:82:92:82:3
`
`8.2.
`
`2:82:9
`
`:0.230
`
`NS3...83..E.
`
`32
`..EEmo>_=m
`
`3.52%
`
`__._ems_
`
`£85
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 14
`
`

`
`' Z70635
`
`L.
`
`‘
`
`-14-
`
`The following Table 4 shows the solubility of fiilvestrant in a range of oil based
`formulations which contain the same amounts of alcohol
`benzyl benzoate but in which the
`
`oil is changed. The data also shows solubility of fulvestrant afier removal of the alcohols.
`‘Table 4
`
`5' Solubility comparisons. of fulvestrant in oil based formulations with and without
`alcohols
`‘
`4
`'
`
`
`10
`
`_
`
`V
`
`Formulation (3)
`'
`Complete vehicle
`Vehicle minus alcohols
`
`Fulvestrant Solubility. mg ml" @ 25°C
`
`Castor oil based
`
`15 Miglyol 812-N based
`
`81.2
`
`86.8
`
`Sesame seed/‘Castor oil (1:1) based
`
`12.5
`
`1.7
`
`4.4
`
`20
`
`I Sesame seed oilbased
`'
`, 40.2
`' Arachis oil-based
`
`
`.
`
`5
`
`45.7
`
`0.7
`
`< 0.2
`
`(a) ‘Complete Vehicle Formulations cornpxised ethanol [96%](10%), benzyl alcohol ( 10%) and benzyl benzoate
`(15%) made to volume with the statedoil. Excess fulvestrant was added to each solvent mixture’ and solubility
`determined.
`
`25
`
`Effect of formulation on precipitation of fulvestrant at the injection site
`
`30
`
`Formulation “
`
`Formulation Fl
`castor oil based
`
`35
`
`Formulation F2
`Miglyol 812-N based
`
`.40 Formulation F3
`sesame seed oil/castor
`oil based
`
`2
`
`0
`
`3
`
`0
`
`.
`
`4
`
`0
`
`Days
`
`10'
`
`30 A
`
`5 1
`
`0
`
`+—+— "
`
`+++
`
`+++
`
`+++
`
`+++
`
`++
`
`+ °
`
`4+
`
`++
`
`4-H»
`
`++
`
`+
`
`4
`
`0
`
`0
`
`+
`
`45
`
`0, + , ++, +‘H- = Degree of precipitation (None detected, Mild, Moderate, Severe)
`3 Formulations comprised fulvestrant (5%), ethanol [96%] (10%), benzyl alcohol (10%) and benzyl benzoate
`( 15%) made to volume with the stated oil.
`'’ Mainly large needle shaped crystals
`° Small needles and/or sheafs of crystals’
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 15
`
`

`
`Z70635 -
`
`C;
`
`t
`
`-
`
`
`
`.
`J
`
`-15-
`
`L,
`
`Precipitation of fulvestrant and the release profile was determined with the above
`
`formulations in an in vivo rabbit study.
`
`’ Figure 1 shows the release profile in viva of the four formulations from the second part
`
`V
`
`of Table 4 and shows the effect of the fixed oil component on fulvestrant-plasma profile over
`
`five days following intramuscular administration in rabbits (data normalised to 50mg per 3kg;
`mean given‘; number of animals per timepoint = 8, plasma samples assayed for fulvestrant
`content using lc-ms/ms detection following solvent extraction). Ascan be seen the castor oil
`formulation showed a particularly even release profile ‘with no evidence ofprecipitation of
`
`.
`
`fulvestrant at the injection site.
`
`10
`
`Therefore we presentas ‘a further feature of the invention an extended release
`
`pharmaceutical formulation adapted for intramuscular injection comprising fulvestrant; 35%
`.(preferably 30% or ideally 25%) or less weight of a pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol per
`volume of formulation, at least l% (preferably atleast 5% or ideally 10%) weight of a
`
`15
`
`pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent miscible in a ricinoleate vehicle per
`volume of formulation and sufficient amount of a ricinoleate vehicle, taking into account the
`addition of any further optional pharmaceutically-acceptable excipients, so as to prepare a
`
`_formu_lation of at least 45mgrnl" of fiilvestrant.
`
`A further feature of the invention is a pharmaceutical formulation adapted for
`intramuscular injection, as defined above, for use in medical therapy.
`I
`
`I
`
`20
`
`A further feature of the invention is a method of treating a benign or malignant
`
`diseases of the breast or reproductive tract, preferably treating breast cancer, by administration
`
`to a human in need of such treatment by intramuscular injection an extended release
`
`ricinoleate vehicle based pharmaceutical formulation comprising at least 45mgml" of
`
`fulvestrant; 35% (preferably 30% or ideally 25%) or less weight of a pharmaceutically-
`
`‘.
`
`25
`
`acceptable alcohol per volume of formulation, at least 1% (preferably at least 5% or ideally
`
`10%) weight of a pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent miscible in a
`
`ricinoleate vehicle per volume of formulation.
`
`Preferably 5ml of the intramuscular injection is administered.
`
`30
`
`A further feature of the invention is use of fulvestrant in the preparation of a
`pharmaceutical formulation as describe hereinabove, for the treatment of a benign or
`malignant disease of the breast or reproductive tract, preferably treating breast cancer.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1002 PAGE 16
`
`

`
`Z70635
`
`C,
`
`-15-
`
`Additional excipients commonly used in the fonnulation field including, for exam

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket