IPR2016‐01268
`U.S. Patent No. 8,365,742
`“Electronic Cigarette”
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`v.
`Fontem Holdings 1 B.V.
`Oral Argument
`October 10, 2017
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`Before the Honorable Brian J. McNamara, Jeremy M. Plenzler, and
`Jo‐Anne M. Kokoski,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor
`IPR2016‐01268
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. Fontem
`Exhibit 1036‐00001
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,365,742
`“Electronic Cigarette”
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
`v.
`Fontem Holdings 1 B.V.
`Oral Argument
`October 10, 2017
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`Before the Honorable Brian J. McNamara, Jeremy M. Plenzler, and
`Jo‐Anne M. Kokoski,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor
`IPR2016‐01268
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. Fontem
`Exhibit 1036‐00001
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,365,742
`
`Fig. 18
`
`(742 Patent, Ex. 1001, 6:27‐52; Petition, paper 2, p. 9)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00002
`
`
`
`Hon 043
`
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`(Petition, paper 2, p. 15; Hon 043, Ex. 1003, pp. 10‐11; Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 22‐23)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00003
`
`
`
`Whittemore
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 2
`
`(Petition, paper 2, pp. 16‐17; Whittemore, Ex. 1004‐00002)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00004
`
`
`
`Hon 043 + Whittemore
`
`+
`
`(Petition, paper 2, pp. 14, 16; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 50)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00005
`
`
`
`KSR Int’l v. Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S.
`398, 416 (2007)
`
`Where a “patent claims a structure already
`known in the prior art that is altered by the mere
`substitution of one element for another known in
`the field, the combination must do more than
`yield predictable results.”
`
`(Petition, paper 2, pp. 4, 19; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 22)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00006
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,365,742
`
`(742 Patent, Ex. 1001, 6:27‐38)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00007
`
`
`
`Supported By
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`742 Patent
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Hon 043, Ex. 1003, p. 7; 742 Patent, Ex. 1001, 5:50‐52;
`Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, pp. 1‐2)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00008
`
`
`
`Meyst ‐ Supported By
`
`742 Patent
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 18:7‐17, 17:21‐23;
`Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, pp. 1‐2)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00009
`
`
`
`Meyst – Supported By
`
`742 Patent
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 9‐11; Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 29;
`Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 48:21‐49:14)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00010
`
`
`
`Weight‐Bearing Support
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 9)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00011
`
`
`
`Meyst – Supported By
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`742 Patent
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 40:9‐13;
`Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 22)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00012
`
`
`
`Supported By – Weight‐Bearing Support (Dr. Sturges)
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`742 Patent
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 8‐9, 11; Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 187:9‐15)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00013
`
`
`
`Supported By – Axial Support (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 12; Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶ 45)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00014
`
`
`
`Supported By – Axial Support (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 12; Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶ 46)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00015
`
`
`
`Supported By – Radial Support (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶¶ 44, 47; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00016
`
`
`
`Claim 3
`
`(742 Patent, Ex. 1001, 6:39‐52)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00017
`
`
`
`Between
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 27(f.n. 3), 28)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00018
`
`
`
`Between
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 27 (f.n. 3), 28; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 50)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00019
`
`
`
`Motivation
`
`(Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶ 59)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00020
`
`
`
`Predictable Results
`
`(Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶ 59)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00021
`
`
`
`Meyst – Whittemore Is “Very Similar”
`
`(Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 42:6‐19; Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, p. 5 (f.n. 5))
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00022
`
`
`
`Meyst ‐ Wire Wrapped Porous Component
`Achieves Predictable Results
`
`(Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 46:4‐8, 10‐11, 21‐25;
`Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, pp. 4‐5)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00023
`
`
`
`Petition – Supported By
`
`(Petition, paper 2, p. 15)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00024
`
`
`
`Supported By
`
`(Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 122:2‐11; Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 12, 18)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00025
`
`
`
`Axial Displacement And Deformation
`
`(Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 118:5‐20; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 12)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00026
`
`
`
`Axial Displacement And Deformation
`
`(Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 119:9‐20; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 12)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00027
`
`
`
`Meyst – Supported By
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 13; Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶¶ 73‐74)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00028
`
`
`
`Meyst – Supported By
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 59:8‐13;
`Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, p. 4)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00029
`
`
`
`Supported By – Ejection Hole Alignment
`(Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 18)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00030
`
`
`
`Supported By – Axial Support
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 14)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00031
`
`
`
`Supported By – Accidental Dropping (Dr. Sturges)
`
`Hon 043
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`742 Patent
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 187:16‐21)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00032
`
`
`
`Hon 043 Acknowledges Eddy Flow
`
`(Hon 043, Ex. 1003, p. 11; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 20; Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶¶ 36, 38)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00033
`
`
`
`Meyst – Hon 043’s Heating Wire Contributes To
`Eddy Flow
`
`(Petition, paper 2, p. 14; Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 54:16‐21;
`Petitioner’s Reply to P.O.’s Suppl. Brief, paper 56, pp. 2‐3)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00034
`
`
`
`Majority of Hon 043’s Droplets Will Bypass
`Heating Wire (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sabersky and Acosta, Ex. 1032‐00004)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00035
`
`
`
`Substantially Increasing Size Of Hon 043’s Wire
`Problematic (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 58)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00036
`
`
`
`Substantially Increasing Size Of Hon 043’s Wire
`Problematic (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 69:3‐12; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 56)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00037
`
`
`
`Substantially Increasing Size Of Hon 043’s Wire
`Problematic (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 56)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00038
`
`
`
`Meyst – Increasing Size of Hon 043’s
`Heating Element Involves Tradeoffs
`
`(Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 62:13‐25)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00039
`
`
`
`PHOSITA Would Retain Ejection Holes (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶¶ 50‐51)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00040
`
`
`
`Meyst – Removing Hon 043’s Atomizer Not An
`Improvement
`
`(Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 128:6‐13; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 26)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00041
`
`
`
`Supported By ‐ Construction
`
`P.O.’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Petitioner’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`“bear all or part of the
`weight of: hold up”
`
`“to hold up, serve as a
`foundation or prop for,
`carry all or part of
`the weight of, or give
`strength to”
`
`(Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 30; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 7)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00042
`
`
`
`Supported By ‐ Construction
`
`(742 Patent, Ex. 1001, 5:42‐50, Figs. 18‐19; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 6;
`Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 9)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00043
`
`
`
`Supported By ‐ Construction
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 6‐7)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00044
`
`
`
`Hon 043’s Ejection Holes Are Not Atomizers
`
`(Hon 043, Ex. 1003, p. 11; Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 22‐23)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00045
`
`
`
`Meyst – Hon 043’s Ejection Holes Are Not
`Atomizers
`
`(Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 80:12‐16; Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 22‐23)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00046
`
`
`
`Meyst – Hon 043’s Ejection Holes Are Not
`Atomizers
`
`(Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 37; Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 81:23‐82:13;
`Petitioner’s Reply to P.O.’s Suppl. Brief, paper 56, pp. 1‐2)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00047
`
`
`
`Meyst – Rigidity of Hon 043’s Porous Body
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 17:21‐23;
`Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, pp. 1‐2)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00048
`
`
`
`Hon 043 – Purported Exit Hole (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 79; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 35)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00049
`
`
`
`Meyst ‐ Hon 043’s Purported Exit Hole
`
`(Hon 043, Ex. 1003, Figs. 1, 2; Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 122:19‐123:1;
`Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 18)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00050
`
`
`
`Hon 043’s Aerosol Passes Through The Porous Body
`
`(Hon 043, Ex. 1003, p. 11; Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 67)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00051
`
`
`
`Hon 043’s Aerosol Passes Through The Porous Body
`(Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 42)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00052
`
`
`
`Meyst – Hon 043’s Cavity Wall is Permeable to Airflow
`
`(Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11; Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 48:9‐14;
`Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, p. 5 (f.n. 6))
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00053
`
`
`
`Hon 043 Airflow
`
`(Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015‐00035)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00054
`
`
`
`Hon 043’s Porous Body ‐ 2 psi (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Suppl. Evid. Decl., Ex. 1034, ¶ 11; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00055
`
`
`
`Meyst ‐ Stress Strain Curves Are Not Relevant
`
`(Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 68:20‐69:2; Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, pp. 2‐3)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00056
`
`
`
`Tensile Strength Not Relevant
`
`(Meyst 1692 IPR Dep. Tr., Ex. 1035, 70:17‐71:2; Petitioner’s Suppl. Brief, paper 51, p. 3)
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00057
`
`
`
`Path of Airflow – Whittemore (Dr. Sturges)
`
`(Sturges Reply Decl., Ex. 1027, ¶ 54; Reply Brief, paper 30, p. 11)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00058
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`
`(Institution Decision, paper 10, p. 6)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00059
`
`
`
`Level of Skill
`
`Mr. Meyst’s Definition
`
`Dr. Sturges’ Definition
`
`“a person with a mechanical or
`electrical engineering degree,
`industrial design degree, or similar
`technical degree, or equivalent
`work experience, and 5‐10 years of
`working in the area of
`electromechanical devices,
`including medical devices”
`
`“a person with at least the
`equivalent of a Bachelor’s degree
`in electrical engineering,
`mechanical engineering, or
`biomedical engineering or related
`fields, along with at least 5 years of
`experience designing
`electromechanical devices,
`including those involving circuits,
`fluid mechanics and heat transfer”
`
`(Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 22; Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶ 30)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00060
`
`
`
`Axial Displacement
`
`Hon 043, Ex. 1003, Fig. 1
`
`(Hon 043, Ex. 1003, Fig. 1; 742 Patent, Ex. 1001, Fig. 1)
`
`742 Patent, Ex. 1001, Fig. 1
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00061
`
`
`
`P.O. Asked Dr. Sturges About “Other” Forces
`
`(Sturges Dep. Tr., Ex. 2016, 126:4‐127:2; Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 9‐10)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00062
`
`
`
`Dr. Sturges – Rigidity
`
`(Sturges Petition Decl., Ex. 1015, ¶ 45)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00063
`
`
`
`Meyst Opined About A Purported Lack Of
`Weight‐Bearing Support
`
`(Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 50)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00064
`
`
`
`Hon 043 Compared To 742 Patent
`
`Hon 043, Ex. 1003, Fig. 6
`
`742 Patent, Ex. 1001, Fig. 18
`
`(Petition, paper 2, pp. 9, 15)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00065
`
`
`
`Meyst – 742 Patent’s Atomizer
`
`742 Patent,
`Ex. 1001, Figs. 18‐19
`
`(Meyst Decl., Ex. 2015, ¶ 29; 742 Patent, Ex. 1001, Figs. 18‐19
`Meyst Dep. Tr., Ex. 1023, 21:7‐22:2; Reply Brief, paper 30, pp. 9‐10)
`
`R.J. Reynolds Vapor Ex. 1036‐00066
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
