throbber
Page 1
`·1· · · IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`· · · · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`·2
`·3· YMAX CORPORATION,· · · · · ·*
`· · · · · · ·Petitioner,· · · · *
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · *· · Case No. IPR2016-01260
`· · VS.· · · · · · · · · · · · ·*
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · *· · Case No. IPR2016-01258
`· · FOCAL IP, LLC,· · · · · · · *
`·6· · · · · ·Patent owner.· · · *
`·7
`·8
`·9
`10· ********************************************************
`11
`12· · · · · · ·ORAL DEPOSITION OF REGIS "BUD" BATES, JR.
`13
`14· ********************************************************
`15
`16
`17· · · ·ANSWERS AND DEPOSITION OF REGIS "BUD" BATES, JR.,
`18· produced as a witness at the instance of the Petitioner,
`19· taken in the above-styled and numbered cause on the 9th
`20· day of August, 2017, A.D., beginning at 9:42 a.m.,
`21· before Rachel J. Payne, a Certified Shorthand Reporter
`22· in and for the State of Texas, in the offices of Nelson
`23· Bumgardner, located at 3131 7th Street, Suite 300, Fort
`24· Worth, Texas, in accordance with the Rules of Civil
`25· Procedure and the agreement hereinafter set forth.
`
`Page 2
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · ·A P P E A R A N C E S
`·2
`·3· FOR THE PETITIONER:
`·4· · · ·Mr. Frank Fabiani
`· · · · ·Mr. Hassan Albakri
`·5· · · ·BRYAN CAVE, LLP
`· · · · ·1290 Avenue of the Americas
`·6· · · ·New York, New York 10104
`· · · · ·212.541.2000
`·7· · · ·frank.fabiani@bryancave.com
`·8
`·9
`· · FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`10
`· · · · ·Mr. John Murphy
`11· · · ·NELSON BUMGARDNER
`· · · · ·3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300
`12· · · ·Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`· · · · ·817.377.9111
`13· · · ·murphy@nelbum.com
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 3
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`·3· Appearances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· · 2
`·4· Exhibit Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· · 3
`·5· REGIS "BUD" BATES, JR.
`·6· · · ·Examination by Mr. Frank Fabiani . . . . . . .· · 4
`·7· Signature and Corrections . . . . . . . . . . . . .· ·63
`·8· Reporter's Certificate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· ·64
`·9
`10· · · · · · · · · · · ·E X H I B I T S
`11· ·(Previously marked exhibits, but were referred to and
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · attached.)
`12
`· · NO.· · · ·DESCRIPTION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`13
`· · 1001· · · Wood, et al Patent No. US 7,764,777 B2· · · 39
`14
`· · 1030· · · Lamb, et al Patent No. US 6,747,970 B1· · · ·7
`15
`· · 1031· · · Allen, et al Patent No. US 6,169,735 B1· · ·26
`16
`· · 2062-1· · Clean and redlined versions of the
`17· · · · · · Proposed Substitute Claims· · · · · · · · · 44
`18· 2062-2· · Clean and redlined versions of the
`· · · · · · · Proposed Substitute Claims· · · · · · · · · 54
`19
`· · 2070-1· · Declaration of Regis J. "Bud" Bates
`20· · · · · · In Support of Patent Owner's Reply in
`· · · · · · · Support of Motion to Amend· · · · · · · · · 10
`21
`· · 2070-2· · Declaration of Regis J. "Bud" Bates in
`22· · · · · · Support of Patent Owner's Reply in Support
`· · · · · · · Of Motion to Amend, Case IPR2016-01258· · · 12
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 4
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · ·REGIS "BUD" BATES, JR.,
`·2· having been first duly cautioned and sworn to testify
`·3· the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,
`·4· testified on his oath as follows:
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`·6· BY MR. FABIANI:
`·7· · · ·Q.· Good morning.
`·8· · · ·A.· Good morning.
`·9· · · ·Q.· Can you please state your name and address for
`10· the record, please.
`11· · · ·A.· Sure.· My name is Regis Jerome Bates, Jr.;
`12· however, I go by "Bud."
`13· · · · · · · · My address is 3413 Ponderosa Loop in Heber,
`14· H-E-B-E-R, Arizona 85928.
`15· · · ·Q.· So I know you have been deposed a number of
`16· times already in these -- in other related IPR
`17· proceedings, so presumably you are familiar with the
`18· process, but I just want to go over a couple of ground
`19· rules.
`20· · · ·A.· Okay.
`21· · · ·Q.· If you don't understand a question I'm asking
`22· you, just let me know and I'll do the best I can to
`23· rephrase it.
`24· · · ·A.· Okay.
`25· · · ·Q.· I might misstate some terms during the day, and
`
`000001
`
`YMAX EXHIBIT 1048
`YMAX CORP. V. FOCAL IP
`IPR2016-01260
`
`

`

`Page 5
`·1· I just appreciate your patience, and you can always
`·2· point it out and I'll try to, you know, rephrase the
`·3· question or fix it.
`·4· · · ·A.· All right.
`·5· · · ·Q.· That being said, you must provide an answer to
`·6· each question.· An attorney may object, but you still
`·7· need to answer the question unless you're explicitly
`·8· instructed not to answer.
`·9· · · ·A.· Okay.
`10· · · ·Q.· If you need a break at any time, let me know
`11· and we'll take a break.· I'd just ask that you answer
`12· any pending question.
`13· · · ·A.· Understood.
`14· · · ·Q.· And please state your answer for the court
`15· reporter and don't use head nods or other nonverbal
`16· forms of communication.
`17· · · ·A.· I will do my best.
`18· · · ·Q.· Is there any reason you are not able to provide
`19· complete and truthful testimony today?
`20· · · ·A.· None at all.
`21· · · ·Q.· Do you understand that you are here to testify
`22· with respect to your declarations in support of patent
`23· owner's replies to petitioner's oppositions to the
`24· motions to amend in IPR numbers 2016-01258 and IPR
`25· 2016-01260?
`
`Page 6
`
`·1· · · ·A.· Yes.
`·2· · · ·Q.· Is your understanding that your testimony and
`·3· opinions in these two declarations relate to certain
`·4· substitute claims that PO has proposed -- patent owner
`·5· has proposed for US patent numbers 7764777 and 8457113?
`·6· · · ·A.· Yes.
`·7· · · ·Q.· I may refer to these two patents as the '777
`·8· and '113 patents if that's okay with you.
`·9· · · ·A.· I do the same thing.
`10· · · ·Q.· So, Mr. Bates, did you write these
`11· declarations?
`12· · · ·A.· I did.
`13· · · ·Q.· Were there any sections you didn't write?
`14· · · ·A.· There were some pieces in there that the
`15· attorneys kind of fluffed up for me because of the --
`16· I'm not a lawyer.· So there are sections regarding
`17· obviousness and things of that nature where I had help
`18· with that.
`19· · · ·Q.· Okay.· And can you just give me a feel for the
`20· overall process of, you know, the back and forth or did
`21· you provide a first draft and then they edited it or did
`22· you -- did they provide you a draft?
`23· · · ·A.· Typically what I did is I read the opposition
`24· and the -- the references that you used.· I prepared a
`25· document that was a -- I don't want to call it a draft,
`
`Page 7
`
`·1· it was a work in progress because they build off of that
`·2· as we go along.· And then normally I don't do a lot of
`·3· the legal stuff up front.· I do put my own bio or CV in
`·4· there and things of that nature, but then as it's done,
`·5· the attorneys help me fine tune it to make sure I'm
`·6· staying within the guidelines of what I can do.
`·7· · · ·Q.· And I'm -- how much time would you say you
`·8· spent overall on this declaration or these declarations?
`·9· · · ·A.· With the reading of all the references, with
`10· the writing of the declarations and so on, there's
`11· probably about 70-plus hours.
`12· · · ·Q.· Just on these reply declarations?
`13· · · ·A.· Yeah.· A lot of documents to read.
`14· · · ·Q.· And so you read each and every reference in
`15· full?
`16· · · ·A.· No.· I read specific cases or specific parts of
`17· them, yeah.· I tried not to read them in full if it --
`18· if it only cited to a specific quote.
`19· · · ·Q.· Did you review anything else that was not
`20· already in the record?
`21· · · ·A.· Not to my knowledge.
`22· · · ·Q.· So, Mr. Bates, I'm handing you Exhibit
`23· YMAX-1030, which was previously marked in IPR 2016-01258
`24· and it's U.S. Patent Number 6747970, and I think we can
`25· call this the Lamb reference; is that okay?
`
`Page 8
`
`·1· · · ·A.· Okay.· Does she need to mark it?
`·2· · · ·Q.· I think it's already marked.
`·3· · · · · · · · MR. FABIANI:· Do you need this?
`·4· · · · · · · · THE REPORTER:· If it's already marked, I
`·5· don't need it.
`·6· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· These things, if they're
`·7· already in the record, I don't think there's a reason to
`·8· mark them.
`·9· · · · · · · · MR. FABIANI:· So we'll just go ahead and
`10· hand them the documents directly.
`11· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· As long as you identify what
`12· it is.
`13· · · · · · · · MR. FABIANI:· Right.
`14· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Yeah.· I don't think we need
`15· to do anything other than that.
`16· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· So have you seen this
`17· document before?
`18· · · ·A.· I have.
`19· · · ·Q.· And what is it exactly?
`20· · · ·A.· Could you repeat that?
`21· · · ·Q.· What is the document?
`22· · · ·A.· This is U.S. Patent 6747970B1, which is the
`23· Lamb, et al, patent.
`24· · · ·Q.· Does Lamb ever use the term edge switch?
`25· · · ·A.· The -- do you suppose I could have a copy of my
`
`000002
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`·1· declaration?· I'd like to --
`·2· · · ·Q.· I think we can just stick with Lamb right now
`·3· just to see if it -- the question is about Lamb, so I
`·4· think we can just --
`·5· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· This is not a memory test.
`·6· This is like a 200-page document, 69 pages, you're
`·7· asking him if this one word is used, you can let him
`·8· look at his declaration.
`·9· · · ·Q.· Okay.· So you're saying you can't recall right
`10· now if Lamb uses the term edge switch?
`11· · · ·A.· Off the top of my head, I don't believe so.
`12· · · ·Q.· Do you think you'd be able to find it if I gave
`13· you a chance?
`14· · · ·A.· Would you like me to go through it and see if I
`15· can find it?
`16· · · ·Q.· I'm just asking if you think you could find
`17· edge switch if you were given the chance.
`18· · · ·A.· I don't -- I don't know that I can answer that
`19· right now.· What I do recall from the bulk of what
`20· everything is, Lamb uses the term "central office." I
`21· don't recall off the top of my head, and I would have to
`22· look it over to determine if they used the term "edge
`23· switch."
`24· · · ·Q.· Okay.· So can you turn to Column 27, Line 17
`25· through 18 of Lamb, please?
`
`Page 10
`
`·1· · · ·A.· Column 27.
`·2· · · ·Q.· Line 17 through 18.
`·3· · · ·A.· 17 through 18.· I'll ask you to bear with me, I
`·4· don't hear well.· If you drop your voice, I won't hear
`·5· it.
`·6· · · ·Q.· No worries.
`·7· · · ·A.· Thank you.
`·8· · · ·Q.· I don't take it personally.
`·9· · · ·A.· Column 17, lines --
`10· · · ·Q.· Column 27?
`11· · · ·A.· Line 27.
`12· · · ·Q.· Column 27?
`13· · · ·A.· Column 27, sorry.
`14· · · ·Q.· I believe it's Lines 17 through 18.· So it says
`15· "The public phone switch 202-2 may be a public telephone
`16· switch."· Do you see that?
`17· · · ·A.· I do.
`18· · · ·Q.· In the 1999 to 2000 time frame, would a person
`19· of ordinary skill in the art understand a tandem switch
`20· to be a public phone switch?
`21· · · ·A.· A person of ordinary skill in the art at that
`22· time would understand many switches to be public phone
`23· switches.
`24· · · ·Q.· Would one of those switches be a tandem switch?
`25· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`
`Page 11
`·1· · · ·A.· One of those switches could be any number of
`·2· other switches, but if you're just calling out one
`·3· particular line here called public switch, as I
`·4· remember, and I told you that Lamb referred to their
`·5· public phone switch as in the central office.· A person
`·6· of ordinary skill in the art at that time would
`·7· understand central office to be that classified or edge
`·8· switch.
`·9· · · ·Q.· Once again, the question is in the 1999 to 2000
`10· time frame, would a person of ordinary skill in the art
`11· understand a tandem switch to be a public phone switch?
`12· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`13· · · ·A.· A person of ordinary skill in the art would
`14· understand that a tandem switch is part of the public
`15· switch telephone network.
`16· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· And what is a tandem switch?
`17· · · ·A.· A tandem switch is as defined in the claim
`18· language here, the tandem switch is a switch that
`19· connects to edge switches and connects to other tandem
`20· switches in both the local as well as the different
`21· geographical area.
`22· · · ·Q.· Okay.· I'm going to hand you Exhibit 2070,
`23· Exhibit Focal IP 2070, which was previously marked in
`24· IPR -- strike that.· Sorry.
`25· · · · · · · · It's Exhibit 2040 in IPR 01260 and it's
`
`Page 12
`·1· entitled "Declaration of Regis J. Bud Bates in Support
`·2· of Patent Owner's Contingent Motion to Amend."
`·3· · · · · · · · Can you turn to paragraph -- I believe it's
`·4· 36.· If you could read off Paragraph 36.
`·5· · · ·A.· 46?
`·6· · · ·Q.· 36, sorry.
`·7· · · ·A.· 36.· I'm reading Paragraph 36 from my
`·8· declaration.· "A POSA would understand that a PSTN
`·9· tandem switch be construed as a switch in the PSTN that
`10· interconnects other PSTN tandem switches and edge
`11· switches."
`12· · · ·Q.· Is that -- is that definition the same
`13· definition you just gave in your last answer?
`14· · · ·A.· I believe so.
`15· · · · · · · · MR. FABIANI:· Can you read back his
`16· testimony to him, is that possible?
`17· · · · · · · · (Requested portion was read.)
`18· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· I believe it's about -- so is
`19· that the same or a different definition?
`20· · · ·A.· It was a little bit different, I added that,
`21· but if I read up on Paragraph 35, I say something to the
`22· effect about halfway down, a POSA in 2000 would have
`23· known that several tandem switches would serve large
`24· metropolitan areas in the United States and would
`25· consider these switches to be local tandem switches from
`
`000003
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`·1· the perspective of a POSA in that particular
`·2· geographical area, which is how I lumped those two kind
`·3· of statements together.
`·4· · · ·Q.· So I'm going to hand you Exhibit 2070, IP 2070,
`·5· which was marked in IPR 2016-01260 and it's entitled
`·6· "Declaration of Regis Bud Bates in Support of Patent
`·7· Owner's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend."
`·8· · · ·A.· Thank you.
`·9· · · ·Q.· Can you turn to Paragraph 40, please.· And you
`10· see where it says "Petitioner's arguments, however, do
`11· not consider that O'Neal and Lamb disclose their
`12· respective call establishment methodologies in the
`13· context of a controller connected to an edge switch.· In
`14· such an arrangement, the controller will not receive
`15· call signaling, i.e., call request, since such signaling
`16· does not pass beyond edge switches."
`17· · · · · · · · Do you see that?
`18· · · ·A.· I do.
`19· · · ·Q.· Does this mean that for a controller to receive
`20· call signaling it must be connected to something other
`21· than an edge switch?
`22· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`23· · · ·A.· The controller that we're referring to is the
`24· TAC, the tandem access controller, which is connected to
`25· a tandem switch, it's associated with a tandem switch.
`
`Page 14
`·1· If we're beyond the edge switch, which is what I've been
`·2· saying, the signaling would not be passed through the
`·3· edge switch to the end device.
`·4· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Okay.· So again, if something
`·5· receives signaling, in your opinion, it must be
`·6· connected to something other than an edge switch?
`·7· · · ·A.· If something receives signaling, am I saying it
`·8· would be connected to something other than an edge
`·9· switch?
`10· · · ·Q.· Yes.
`11· · · ·A.· That is not what I just said.· I said the
`12· signaling does not go beyond the edge switch.· An edge
`13· switch will receive signaling, a tandem switch will
`14· receive signaling, that's the SS7 network that I've
`15· described in several of my declarations.
`16· · · ·Q.· So what must the controller be connected to to
`17· receive signaling, can you give me an example?
`18· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`19· · · ·A.· Let's back up just a second here.· All right.
`20· There's different types of signaling in this network.
`21· Okay?· The signaling that we're referring to as being
`22· edge switch, controller, tandem switches, things of that
`23· nature, will receive SS7 signaling.· Okay?· There are
`24· other types of signaling that we're talking about.· To
`25· ask me what must something be connected to in order to
`
`Page 15
`
`·1· receive signaling, all right -- you know, I mean, a
`·2· basic telephone generates in-band signaling information,
`·3· but that is not SS7, that is not the signaling that
`·4· we're talking about.· We send the digits down the wires.
`·5· The controller that we're talking about here, the TAC,
`·6· would be connected as its defined as a tandem access
`·7· controller, so it's going to be in communications with
`·8· the tandem switch.
`·9· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Okay.· So when they say the
`10· controller will not receive call signaling, such as --
`11· you mean SS7 signaling here; is that correct?
`12· · · ·A.· Say that again, please.
`13· · · ·Q.· In Paragraph 40, you say "In such an
`14· arrangement, the controller will not receive call
`15· signaling."· Here you mean SS7 signaling as an example;
`16· is that correct?
`17· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`18· · · ·A.· What I'm referring to here is that in
`19· describing O'Neil and Lamb and so on, their respective
`20· call establishment methodologies in the context of a
`21· controller that is connected to an edge switch, so
`22· they're on the other side of the edge switch in such an
`23· arrangement, what I am saying is that controller will
`24· not receive the call signaling, the SS7 type signaling
`25· since the signaling does not pass beyond the edge
`
`Page 16
`
`·1· switch.
`·2· · · ·Q.· So you're saying that Lamb's TA -- TNS or THS
`·3· doesn't receive call signaling, that's your opinion?
`·4· · · ·A.· What I'm saying is Lamb is defining an edge
`·5· switch, okay, and it's TNS and THS.· The TNS is
`·6· connected at the central office, the edge switch.· The
`·7· THS is a board of that.· They can signal each other.
`·8· · · ·Q.· Can we go to Column 12, Lines 50 through 65 of
`·9· Lamb?
`10· · · ·A.· I'm sorry.· I missed --
`11· · · ·Q.· Column 12, Line 50.
`12· · · ·A.· Column 12, Line 50 of Lamb.
`13· · · ·Q.· Do you see where it says "A call signal message
`14· is generally a specific signaling protocol message, such
`15· as a message provided by the PINT or SS7 protocols" --
`16· · · ·A.· I do.
`17· · · ·Q.· -- "that is transferred between the
`18· telecommunications hosting server and telecommunications
`19· network server."
`20· · · · · · · · Do you see that?
`21· · · ·A.· Correct.
`22· · · ·Q.· So here Lamb is saying an example of call
`23· signaling is SS7 signaling; is that correct?
`24· · · ·A.· Either SS7 or PINT, sure.
`25· · · ·Q.· So can we go to Column 20, Lines 46 through 58.
`
`000004
`
`

`

`Page 17
`·1· Do you see where it says "The processor executes the
`·2· first user agent to receive in its telecommunications
`·3· hosting server at least one first call signaling message
`·4· from the connection based network indicating a request
`·5· to establish at least one call connection"?
`·6· · · ·A.· I see that.
`·7· · · ·Q.· What is the connection based network?
`·8· · · ·A.· The connection based network is what we refer
`·9· to as the PSTN.
`10· · · ·Q.· So does this state that the THS,
`11· telecommunications hosting server, receives call
`12· signaling from PSTN?
`13· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`14· · · ·A.· Does the THS receive call signaling from --
`15· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· The PSTN?
`16· · · ·A.· -- the PSTN?· It would basically be controlled,
`17· the TNS is controlled by the THS and it sends
`18· information to the processor to produce a connection.
`19· · · ·Q.· Is TNS the connection based network?
`20· · · ·A.· The TNS is connected to the edge switch.· It's
`21· right there in -- with the edge switch in the central
`22· office as Lamb describes it.
`23· · · ·Q.· But it's a part of the connection based
`24· network?
`25· · · ·A.· It is connected to the edge switch.· It's not
`
`Page 18
`·1· part of the edge switch network.· The PSTN is the PSTN.
`·2· This is a device that's connected to it.
`·3· · · ·Q.· So when it receives -- when Lamb says it
`·4· receives call signaling message from the connection
`·5· based network, it receives it from the edge switch?
`·6· · · ·A.· The TNS is controlling that edge switch and
`·7· telling it to create a connection, so it's receiving it
`·8· from that TNS.
`·9· · · ·Q.· I'm sorry.· It says it receives it from the
`10· connection based network and you said that the TNS isn't
`11· part of the connection based network?
`12· · · ·A.· It's connected to the edge switch.· It's
`13· controlling that edge switch.
`14· · · ·Q.· Can we go to Column 24, Line 28 of that?
`15· · · ·A.· Column 24, line what?
`16· · · ·Q.· 28.
`17· · · ·A.· 28.· Thank you.
`18· · · ·Q.· Do you see where it says "Also included is a
`19· means for processing at least one call signaling message
`20· to provide enhanced calling services including at least
`21· one of conference calling, whisper room conference
`22· calling, time-based whisper room conference calling" --
`23· · · ·A.· Okay.· You referred me to line 28 and you
`24· started reading some place else.
`25· · · ·Q.· I'm sorry.· It's line 32.
`
`Page 19
`
`·1· · · ·A.· Okay.· I see that.
`·2· · · ·Q.· What does that mean to you?
`·3· · · ·A.· Well --
`·4· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`·5· · · ·A.· -- it's an embodiment that basically the user
`·6· agent process, which is software in the THS is going to
`·7· perform within the hosting server, the THS.· The user
`·8· agent process includes a means for receiving at least
`·9· one call signaling message indicating an incoming call
`10· connection.· So the THS is getting an information that
`11· there's an incoming call connection, that's what it
`12· means.· I can read on that it -- also included is the
`13· means for at least one call signaling message to provide
`14· enhanced calling services, including one of at least
`15· conference calling, whisper room conferencing,
`16· time-based whisper, all of the different features that
`17· the THS itself provides.
`18· · · ·Q.· So in a context of the PSTN, are you familiar
`19· with the term STP?
`20· · · ·A.· I am.
`21· · · ·Q.· And what is an STP?
`22· · · ·A.· Signaling transfer point.· An STP sits on the
`23· SS7 network and it is a message packet switching that
`24· sends SS7 messages from STP to STP or STP to SCP and so
`25· on.
`
`Page 20
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· Is an edge switch an example of an STP?
`·2· · · ·A.· No.· An edge switch is an edge switch.· An STP
`·3· does not provide voice communications.
`·4· · · ·Q.· Okay.· So are STPs directly connected to the
`·5· telephones?
`·6· · · ·A.· No.· They're connected to switches and
`·7· databases, and things of that nature.
`·8· · · ·Q.· Can you give me an example of an STP?
`·9· · · ·A.· Could you be more specific?
`10· · · ·Q.· Any kind of example of an STP, I just want
`11· you -- do you know an example of an STP?
`12· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`13· · · ·A.· I mean, that's a question that could cover a
`14· wide range, but I will give you a little bit of an idea
`15· what an STP is.· It's a packet switching system that
`16· processes SS7 messages.· SS7 messages are very specific
`17· protocols that are used for the call setup, call
`18· teardown signaling, signaling, okay, not the actual
`19· call, but the signaling.· So it's a packet based
`20· switching system.
`21· · · ·Q.· And in the context of the PSTN, are you
`22· familiar with the term SSP?
`23· · · ·A.· SSP is -- yes.
`24· · · ·Q.· And what is an SSP?
`25· · · ·A.· It's a switching service -- or service
`
`000005
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`·1· switching point.
`·2· · · ·Q.· Can you give me some examples of SSPs?
`·3· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`·4· · · ·A.· SSPs are add-on-type processors that are added
`·5· onto an edge switch or any other switch across the
`·6· network, the hierarchy of switchings that will process
`·7· the messages that have to go to an STP.
`·8· · · ·Q.· So you said that an SSP will be connected to an
`·9· edge switch; is that true?
`10· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`11· · · ·A.· An edge switch would be connected to an SSP,
`12· vice versa.
`13· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· And would a tandem switch be
`14· connected to an SSP?
`15· · · ·A.· More than likely, yes.
`16· · · ·Q.· Does an STP interconnect SSPs?
`17· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`18· · · ·A.· An STP services SSPs.· The SSPs are connected
`19· to the STP.
`20· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Does an STP connect -- sorry,
`21· strike that.
`22· · · · · · · · Does an STP route SS7 signals between SSPs?
`23· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`24· · · ·A.· An SSP will send its information up to the STP
`25· that produces a packet.· The packet then gets routed
`
`Page 22
`·1· from STP to STP and so on and so forth; however, it also
`·2· will communicate down to the SSPs.
`·3· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· So can we go back to
`·4· Exhibit 2040 in the 1260 proceeding.· And turn back to
`·5· Paragraph 39, please -- or 36 sorry, my fault.
`·6· · · ·A.· 36.
`·7· · · ·Q.· Yes.· Did you consider this definition when
`·8· determining that a POSA would recognize that an STP
`·9· could not function as a tandem switch?
`10· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`11· · · ·A.· Would you ex -- say that one again.
`12· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Can we take you to
`13· Exhibit 2070 in the IPR 1260, Paragraph 39.
`14· · · ·A.· Paragraph?
`15· · · ·Q.· 39, please.
`16· · · ·A.· 39.· Okay.
`17· · · ·Q.· So here you say that a POSA would recognize
`18· that an STP cannot function as a tandem switch.
`19· · · ·A.· I would.· In the definition of the tandem
`20· switch that we're dealing with in the claim language,
`21· the tandem switch is a switch that is connected to edge
`22· switches and other tandem switches.
`23· · · · · · · · The STP is a message switch that carries
`24· signaling messages.· A tandem switch handles voice call
`25· setup, call teardown and carries voice.· Well, actually,
`
`Page 23
`·1· it's the edge switch that would generate the call setup
`·2· and request, the tandem is just passing it through to an
`·3· edge switch or to another tandem switch.
`·4· · · · · · · · So a POSA would recognize that an STP is
`·5· not a tandem switch as we're describing tandem switch
`·6· here.
`·7· · · ·Q.· Okay.· So you considered your proposed
`·8· instruction in Paragraph 36 of your Exhibit 2040
`·9· declaration when determining that a POSA would recognize
`10· that an STP cannot function as a tandem switch in
`11· Exhibit 2070, Paragraph 39?
`12· · · ·A.· Are you giving me a sequence that I considered
`13· this based on this?
`14· · · ·Q.· Did you consider that -- the definition in
`15· Paragraph 36 when determining in Paragraph 39 that a
`16· POSA would recognize that an STP cannot function as a
`17· tandem switch?
`18· · · ·A.· I'm trying to look at the dates on these. I
`19· think we're out of sequence here a little bit, but -- so
`20· I wrote this on 4/2 -- I signed this on 4/2 and this one
`21· is July.
`22· · · · · · · · Okay.· A POSA in April would have
`23· understood in July the same thing that I'm saying here,
`24· that an STP is not a tandem switch in the PSTN.
`25· · · ·Q.· Right.· But did you consider that explicit
`
`Page 24
`
`·1· definition when making that determination?
`·2· · · ·A.· I would consider that as well as a number of
`·3· other information, just reading the SS7 guidelines would
`·4· point me to that same thing.· Looking at some of the
`·5· other diagrams that we've used in these different claims
`·6· and so on, we would use that same combination.· An STP
`·7· is part of the SS7 network, which is really -- it's kind
`·8· of an overlay, not really part of the PSTN.· The PSTN
`·9· uses the SS7 for stapling, but they are different boxes.
`10· An STP is a packet switch that carries signaling
`11· messages.· A tandem switch is a tandem switch that is
`12· connected to edge switches, and yes -- so my knowledge
`13· -- and a POSA would understand that definition that I
`14· just gave you when I made this statement about an STP is
`15· not a tandem switch.
`16· · · ·Q.· So going back to Exhibit 2040, Paragraph 36,
`17· does that construction explicitly require the
`18· transmission of voice?
`19· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`20· · · ·A.· Does that construction require what?
`21· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Does that proposed
`22· construction you have proposed in Paragraph 36 mention
`23· the -- or require the -- sorry.· Strike that.
`24· · · · · · · · Does that proposed construction in
`25· Paragraph 36 explicitly require the transmission of
`
`000006
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`·1· voice?
`·2· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`·3· · · ·A.· It does not explicitly require the transmission
`·4· of voice; however, a POSA would understand that a tandem
`·5· switch is going to carry voice and not the signaling.
`·6· As a matter of fact, if I recall correctly, all of
`·7· the -- or most of the experts in both side of this case
`·8· have said the same thing.
`·9· · · ·Q.· Is an STP a switch that interconnects PSTN
`10· tandem switches and edge switches?
`11· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`12· · · ·A.· As I said, they are connected to an STP.· Edge
`13· switches and tandem switches are connected to an STP.
`14· · · ·Q.· Does it interconnect them?
`15· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`16· · · ·A.· I think you would have to give me a definition
`17· of what you mean by interconnect.
`18· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Let's -- you're -- that comes
`19· from you, so what do you mean by interconnect?· In
`20· Paragraph 36, you used the word interconnect, what does
`21· that mean to you?
`22· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`23· · · ·A.· Interconnect means they are connected to each
`24· other, uh-huh.
`25· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· So I'm going to hand you
`
`Page 26
`·1· Exhibit YMAX 1031, which was previously marked in IPR
`·2· 2016-01258 and is U.S. Patent Number 6169735, otherwise
`·3· known as the Allen reference.
`·4· · · · · · · · Look at that Figure 1 of Allen, please.· So
`·5· does this figure illustrate an STP connected to a tandem
`·6· switch?
`·7· · · ·A.· It does.
`·8· · · ·Q.· And does this figure illustrate an STP
`·9· connected to central office switches?
`10· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`11· · · ·A.· It shows the STP communicating with the central
`12· office.· And to answer an earlier question you asked, is
`13· the tandem switch -- or is an STP a tandem switch?
`14· These are defined as completely separate and distinct
`15· items.· A tandem is designated with a T.· An STP, the
`16· signaling portion of the network, is designated with
`17· STP.· They are different.
`18· · · ·Q.· How does signaling get from CO-10, for example,
`19· to tandem T-16?
`20· · · ·A.· How does signaling get to the tandem from CO
`21· number 10?
`22· · · ·Q.· Yes.
`23· · · ·A.· Typically using the STP, the CO will send its
`24· message up.· It's information up to the STP.· The STP
`25· will then forward it back down to the tandem.
`
`Page 27
`·1· · · ·Q.· Can we go back to Lamb, please.· Can we go to
`·2· Figure 1 of Lamb.· And what is that showing there?
`·3· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`·4· · · ·A.· It's labeled as "Figure 1 conventional circuit
`·5· switch telephone network."· This is a great way to kind
`·6· of give you an answer, again, to what I had said earlier
`·7· that the SS7 network is kind of an overlay on the PSTN.
`·8· It's not really the PSTN, but it's an overlay.· It's a
`·9· separate signaling portion of the network.· And it also
`10· shows several central office switches, which a POSA
`11· would understand is central office switch to be an edge
`12· switch.
`13· · · ·Q.· Can we go to Column 1 of Lamb, Line 36.· And
`14· you can read through Line 45.
`15· · · ·A.· You're talking -- I couldn't hear you.
`16· · · ·Q.· Oh, you can read through Line 45.
`17· · · ·A.· Line 45, okay.· I'm there.
`18· · · ·Q.· So do you see where it says "Communications,
`19· media, e.g., telephone lines, wireless links and/or the
`20· like, interconnect the offices 110 through 113 to one
`21· another."
`22· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· What line are you on?
`23· · · · · · · · MR. FABIANI:· I'm sorry.· It's Line 42.
`24· · · ·A.· Line?
`25· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· 42.
`
`Page 28
`
`·1· · · ·A.· 42, okay.· Okay.· I see where it says that.
`·2· · · ·Q.· Does Lamb refer to Items 231 and 232 of
`·3· Figure 4 as lines or telephone lines or communication
`·4· links?
`·5· · · · · · · · MR. MURPHY:· Objection, form.
`·6· · · ·A.· Does Lamb refer to -- please --
`·7· · · ·Q.· (BY MR. FABIANI)· Items 231 and 232 of Figure 4
`·8· as lines or telephone lines or communication links?
`·9· · · ·A.· In Column 34, Lines 8 through 10, Lamb refers
`10· to "call connection 232, as well as the identity of the
`11· inactive call connection 231 (which is the call
`12· connection associated with the call destination
`13· identifier or phone number of the user tel

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket