throbber
/The Organic Chemistry of
`Drug Design and Drug Action/
`
`Richard B.\\Si|verman
`Department of "Chemistry
`Northwestern University
`Evanston, Illinois
`
`ACADEMIC PRESS
`A Divisiarl of Harcourt Brace & Company
`San Diego New York Boston London Sydney Tokyo Toronto
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1013
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1013
`
`

`
`uid Us on
`
`We
`
`http
`
`swvapne corn
`
`11
`
`oh
`
`nrintado4acid-frcepape
`
`Copyright
`
`1992 by ACADEMIC PRESS
`
`All RighL
`
`It served
`
`aConmaybere mdnecdortransm1ied many leer orby ary
`paitofthuspubh
`means ci etronic or mechanical
`including phmocopy recording or any inform ton
`trson ii w- Ii
`ystem without peer
`froer the puhliaher
`
`storage and rise viii
`
`Academic Press
`
`ii
`
`13
`
`rc
`
`cr1
`
`94
`
`nor
`
`err
`
`ge
`
`-44
`
`tjitrd Kingdom Ediiw FlthIished by
`Acade ac Press Lint eel
`2428 Oval Road London NWI 7DX
`
`di aryof Cm gresa Catalog og-in-Pub Ic tie Data
`
`Si vnaar RkluardB
`The urgerie cheruatry of drug design and drug acts
`Silverman
`
`Re ised
`
`Includes
`index
`ISBN 5126437308 hardcover
`Pharmaceutical
`
`chensiatsy
`
`Bioorgarnc etemistry
`
`Drugs- Design
`Molecular pharmacology
`DNLM
`Cbcmlstiy Organic
`Ciemsstr Pharmaceutical
`QV 744 S587oJ
`Drug Desig
`Phannacokinetirs
`R5403.S53
`
`Title
`
`1992
`
`613 ltr.dclO
`DNLIMLC
`to
`
`ibnarvolCoigress
`
`Fr 4rl
`
`tle
`
`radS
`
`iv
`
`47041
`
`UP
`
`

`
`CHAPTER
`
`Drug Discovery Design
`and Development
`
`__
`
`Drug Discovery
`Drug Discovery without
`Librium
`Pen
`Ihus
`cad Discovery
`Ruidom
`enmg
`Clinknl Causervaunus
`
`ad
`
`Noncindom Scrrn ng
`Drug Mctabolisr Studies
`kariona App oahes an Lead La-
`ruver
`Id
`
`IL Drug Deve1opment Lead Modification
`Identification of thc Active Part Thc Pharmacophore
`13 Functional Group Modthcation
`13
`
`11
`
`ructuteActivaty Relationships
`Structure Modifications to Increase Potcn
`ham Branchin
`
`Homokaga ion 16
`Bini otermm 19
`
`14
`
`18
`
`and therapeutic Index
`Rm Liam tr usformat ons 18
`
`15
`
`Quanttatave StructureActivity Relationships
`Physico hemica
`ameters 24
`Historical
`23
`ochemc
`Phy
`Paraireters with Biological Acti
`Mthods
`QSAR Related to Rec pior Band ug 43
`Molecular Graphic Bascd Drug Dcsigai
`44
`47
`Fpilogue
`
`Rcference
`
`Genetal Reterences
`
`50
`
`23
`
`sed to CorreLtc
`Methods
`Computer Besd
`
`Drug Discovery
`
`In general clinically used drugs are not discovered What
`is more likely
`discovered is known as
`lead compound The lead is
`prototype compound
`that has the desired biological or pharmacological activity but may have
`for example high toxicity other bio
`many other undesirable characteristics
`logical ctivltis insolukiht or wetabolFsm problem The structure of the
`lead compound is then modified by synthesis to amplify the desircd activity
`and to minimize or eliminate thc unwanted properties Prior to an ehiboration
`of approaches to lead discovery and lead modification two of the rare drugs
`discovered without
`lead are discussed
`
`

`
`Drug Discovery
`
`Drug Discovery without
`
`Lead
`
`Fenicilhins
`
`culture of
`
`this
`
`grecn mold growing in
`In 1928 Alexander
`leming noticed
`StaphyIococcw aureu and where thc two had convcrged
`the bacteria were
`lysed This led to the discovcry of penicillin which was produced by the
`mold It may be thought
`this observation was madc by other scientists
`that
`who just ignored it and therciore Fleming was unique for following up on it
`Howevei
`the case Fleming tried many times to rediscover
`this is not
`phenomenon without success it was his colleaguc Dr Ronald Hare23 who
`was able to reproduce the observation It only occurred the first
`tune because
`took place simultancously Hare found
`combination of unlikely cvents all
`that very special conditions were required to produce thc phenomenon ini
`tially observed by Fleming The culture dish inoculated by Fleming must have
`become accidentally and simultaneously contaminated with the mold spore
`Instead of placing the dish in the ref ngerator or incubator when he went on
`vacation as is normally done Fleming inidveitently left
`it on his lab bench
`When he returned the following month he noticed the lysed bacteria Ordi
`narily penicillin does not lyse these bacteria it prevents them from develop
`if added after the bacteria have developed However
`ing but it has no effect
`lemmg was on vacation July to August
`the weather was unseason
`whale
`ably cold and this provided the particular temperature required for the mold
`and the staphylococci
`to grow slowly and produce the lysis Another extraor
`dinary circumstance was that the particular strain of the mold on
`Jemings
`culture was
`relatively good penicillin producer although most strains of that
`mold PniciI1ium produce no penicillin at all
`he mold presumably came
`from the laboratory just below Flemings where research on molds was going
`on at
`the time
`Although Fleming suggested that penicillin could he useful as
`topical
`antiseptic he was not successful
`form suitable to
`in producing penicillin in
`treat infections Nothing more was done until Sir Howard
`lorry at Oxford
`University reinvestigated the possibility of producing penicillin in
`useful
`form In 1940 he succeeded in producing penicillin that could be administered
`topically and systemically4 but the full extent of the value of penicillin was
`the late l940s Iwo reasons for the delay in the universal
`revealed until
`utilization of penicillin were the en ugence of the sulfonamide intabacterials
`sulfa drugs LI see Chapter
`Section IV 131 in 1935 and the outbreak of
`World War
`The pharm icology production and clinical application of
`this wonder drug would
`pcmeiflin were not revealed until after the war so that
`
`ii
`
`SO2NHR
`
`

`
`Drug Discovery Dc ign 6nd Deve opment
`
`team of Allicd scientIsts vho wer interrt ga
`not be used by the Germans
`rng Uciman scicntists invoved in chemothciapeutic
`rcscaich wcre told that
`report of penicillin wis mad usr lot co nmer
`thc Liermans thought
`inc initial
`reasons to coi
`ipete with the sulfa drugs
`take the report
`hey did not
`
`ci
`
`seriously
`he original mold was Penkilhum nc zaiwn
`strain that gave
`relatively
`tow yield of penicillin It was replaced by Pc mc iiiim hry
`aiim which
`had been cultured horn mold growing on
`in market in Peoria
`grapefruit
`Illinois the correct structure of penicillin 22 was elucidated in 1943 by Sir
`Robert Robinson Oxford and Karl olker Merck Several different penn
`these 22
`gioup varied were isolated early on only two of
`cillin analogs
`CL Ph penicillin Gj are still
`PnuCIl2 penicitlin
`and 2.2
`in use
`today
`
`11
`
`22
`
`cit
`
`OI
`
`Eibrium
`
`he first
`
`chloro methy1
`ibrium
`rzodiaiepine tranquill7u drug
`phenyl-3111 4-benzodIazepine 4oxide 2.33 was discovered seren
`arnino
`en Sternbach at Roche was involved in
`dipitously Dr
`program to synthe
`new class of tranquilizer drugs He originally set out to prepare
`size
`series
`of benzhcptoxdiazines 2.4 but when
`NR2 and R2 was C6H5 it
`was
`oxide 2.S
`was found that
`the actual stiucture was that of
`quinazolme
`However none of
`these compounds gave any interesting pharmacological
`results The program was abandoned in 1955 in order br Sternbach to work
`In 1957 during
`on
`different project
`laboratory cleanup
`general
`CH NICH3 R2
`Cl R1
`containing what was thought
`to be 2.5
`C6H1 was found and as
`last effort was submitted for pharmacological
`the other compounds submitted this one gave very promis
`alike all
`testing
`tests used for preliminary screening of tranquilizers
`ang results in six different
`
`vial
`
`ci
`
`2.3
`
`j2
`
`2.4
`
`2.5
`
`

`
`NH
`
`Drug 015 overy
`
`CI
`
`2Ai
`
`HNH
`
`NH113
`
`CI
`
`10
`
`NHH
`
`_j1
`11
`
`23
`
`Scheme 2i Mecharnsm for torr aton of
`
`bruim
`
`the compound was not
`Further investigation revealed
`that
`quinaioline
`uhcr was the beniodiaieprnc
`oxide Z.3j presumably pro
`3-oxide out
`duced in an uncxpccted
`reactLon of the eorrcsponding chioromethyl quinaio
`line 3-oxide 2.6 with methylamine Schemc
`If this coirpound had not
`been found in the taboratory cleanup all of the negative pharmacological
`results would havc bccn reportcd for thc quinaoline
`oxide class of corn
`oxidcs may not have been disoovcrcd for rnan
`and benzodiazepine
`pounds
`years to ornc
`lead are quite few in number
`he cxamples of drug discovery without
`The typical occurrence is that
`lead compound is identified and its structure
`is modified to give eventually the drug that goes to the clinic
`
`Lead Discovery
`
`Penicillin
`
`and Labiiurn are inde4ed two important drugs that were discov
`they then became
`Lead Once they were id ntthed however
`ered without
`here are now myriad of penicillin-
`lead compounds for future analogs
`derived aritibacterrals that have been synthesized as the result of the structure
`tdiazepam 2.7 was synthesized
`etucidarion of rhc earliest penicillins \aliur
`at Roche even before Librium was introduced on to the market
`this drug was
`derived from the lead compound
`and is almost 10 ti nes note potent
`than the lead
`
`

`
`gr
`
`Dy
`
`proart
`
`27
`
`ry
`
`ii
`
`und
`
`Ii
`
`in
`her
`
`for
`
`ste
`
`relati
`
`to
`
`activi
`
`and
`
`st
`
`elic ii
`
`etv cci
`
`is
`
`ci not
`
`thc diheul
`KroI
`arisc
`sc
`in
`it scveial appro cites tt at can tx ker
`ad
`icier tify
`for all of the approaches is to has
`ay compound
`mear
`requirement
`whe
`it will be kro
`particular biokwi al
`cc nporind
`ictivity so hr
`ans of terr nin
`SQ or eree
`Is achy
`hi IogIcaI
`vhtFc
`ontiol cot pound
`en np rind ias the desire
`iv
`of he euripo nd is Note tie
`vhat tie it
`the terms act
`the
`licular
`zy
`ffv
`
`ulsan
`
`tivi
`
`pt armacological
`urt
`
`oh
`the hr rtt of tE
`tests
`begin as
`ret eptor others
`to prevert an rduced seilu
`uu ker and less cx
`va ely of ppro ehes to de rof
`
`reer
`nta
`tic
`
`Cur
`
`tie
`
`are
`
`ipu mci
`tets
`
`Random Screening
`
`p1
`
`It
`
`On
`
`dci
`
`ac iv
`
`Ci
`
`icc
`
`elf
`
`Sort
`
`nhi
`
`it
`
`ts for
`
`in
`
`says or
`or
`ci yr
`tie ability
`
`It
`
`ncr
`ti
`de ekiivd
`
`ad
`
`Randa ii
`irvolves no mId eemal ation alit
`trir
`npou id arc ested ii
`the di ens ry of
`the ooa say vithout regard to titer sIt ietures Poor to 1935
`sulfa ci ugs random screening Wa
`tally lit oni approaeh today this
`esser
`ci to 1eer Jegre Howe
`dora seenng programs are
`method
`11 order to
`leads that has
`seover drugs
`still very important
`imexpected
`and unusual
`tnictu Cs fo various targets
`two major classes
`reene
`nate ral
`tie yntheire
`ianne An
`ant and
`tural prod let
`xau Ic of
`rerobi ii
`creen
`ci na oral mpour ci
`is he
`syn ietie
`orgies aid th Nat anal Cancer
`nst tu
`cot pa nd
`mit
`ret ned ii
`cci drug re tilted fiat
`anti
`ij
`nn
`vqv
`
`hen ais and
`odour
`
`ar or
`
`icer
`
`ii
`
`th
`
`sic
`
`au
`
`19
`bio ssay
`
`declared
`Ary ne
`ew
`
`frogs
`
`nf
`
`ci
`
`th
`
`tFe
`
`set
`
`icr
`
`rio
`
`Ut
`
`ci
`
`Ti
`
`Ic
`
`are no
`
`utili
`
`cci
`
`In
`
`1940s
`
`ci
`
`tout plc hi
`cc
`by
`
`anti
`
`11
`
`ay
`it us ph
`
`iii
`
`ci
`
`in
`aken
`in
`ci Fuutwo mp rtant
`acisu eo
`dine were foun
`
`euti
`
`eomp
`case
`
`of soil
`
`ii
`
`as
`
`randon
`
`950
`aid
`
`iI
`
`eros
`
`hr rlonyein
`
`citi
`
`clii
`
`

`
`Drug Discovery
`
`Nonrandom Screening
`
`than is random
`slightly more narrow approach
`Nonrantlom 3crenüig is
`saue reenh1ance to weakl
`screening In thi casc compounds has lug
`random sercerl or compounds containing
`activt compounds uncovered
`in
`functional groups than leads may Lx tested selectively By the late
`different
`1970s the National Cancer Ins titutcs random screen was modified to
`non
`random screen because of budgetary and rnanpowcr restrictions Also the
`single tumor screen was changed to
`variety of tumor screens as it was
`realized that cancer
`is not just
`single disease
`
`Drug Metabolism Studies
`
`During metabolism studies drug mezabolites drug degradation products gen
`crated in viva that are isolated are screened in order to determine if
`the
`activity observed is derived from the drug candidate or from metabolite For
`example the anti rnflammatory drug sulindac 2.S is not
`the active agent the
`metabolic reduction product 2.9 is rcsponsible for the activity
`classic
`example of this approach is thc discovery of the antibacterial agent sulfanii
`amide 2J
`which was found to be metabolite of prontoil 2.10
`Section IVB1 for details
`see haptcr
`
`OH
`
`2.8
`
`NH
`
`4H1
`NN
`
`2.10
`
`SONI12
`
`Clinical Observations
`
`trials will exhibit more
`Often
`drug candidate during animal testing or clinical
`is it may produce
`than one pharmacological activity that
`Ihis
`side effect
`compound then can bc used as
`lead for the secondary activity
`antihistamine dimenhydrinate 2.11 Dramamine was tested at
`the allergy
`clinic at Johns Hopkins University and was found also to be effective
`
`In 1947 an
`
`in
`
`

`
`10
`
`Drug Di ovory
`
`agn and Dev opr ert
`
`patient who suffered from car sickness
`further study proved its
`relieving
`is now the
`effectiveness in the treatment of seasickness9 and airsickness
`forms of noton sin
`mot idely used Jiug for th treatment of all
`An antibacterial agent car butamide 212
`NH
`was found to have an
`antidiabetic side effect However it could not be us
`as an antidiabetic drug
`then was
`because of its antibacterial activity Carbutamidc
`lead for the
`discovery of tolbutamide 2J2
`CH3 an antidiabetic drug without anti
`bacterial activity
`
`It
`
`Ph
`
`11
`
`211
`
`Cu
`
`SO2NF CNH
`
`212
`
`Rational Approaches to Lead Discovery
`
`None of the above approaches
`to lead discovery involves
`major rational
`component The lead is just found by screening techniques as
`by product of
`drug metabolism studies or from whole animal investigations Is it possible to
`compound having
`particuLr activity Rational apprrache to drug
`design
`design have now become the major routes to lead discovery The first step is
`to identify the cause for the disease state Most diseases or at
`the
`least
`symptoms of diseases arise from an imbalance of particular chemicals in the
`body from the invasion of
`foreign organism or from aberrant cell growth
`As discussed in later chapters the effects of the imbalance can be corrected
`receptor see Chapter
`by antrgonism or agonisru of
`or by inhibition of
`particular enzyme see Chapter
`Foreign organism enzyme inhibition and
`interference with DNA biosynthesis or function see
`are also im
`hapter
`to treat diceise ariing frnm nuicrnorganisrn and aher
`porthnt approaches
`rant cell growth
`Once the relevant biochemical system is identified lead compounds
`then
`become the natural receptor agonists or enzyme substrates For example lead
`compounds for the contraceptives norgestrel 2.13 and 7c-ethynylestra
`diol 214 were the steroidal hormones progesterone 215 and 17/3 estradiol
`
`c_H HI
`
`OH
`
`OH
`
`CE
`
`c_H HO-C
`
`213
`
`214
`
`

`
`Drug Deveopment Lead Mod1cabon
`
`11
`
`2.16 Whcreas
`the steroid hormoncs 2.15 and 2.16 show weak and short
`lastmg effects the oral contraceptives 2.13 and 2i4 exert stlong progesta
`tional activity of long duration
`
`OH
`
`JJCJ1t$
`
`15
`
`216
`At Merck it was believed that serotonin 217 was
`possibk mcdrator of
`inflammation Consequently serotoiun was used as
`lead for antiinflamma
`tory agents and from this lead the antiinflammatoiy drug indomcthaein 2.18
`was developed
`
`HO
`
`NH
`
`217
`
`OH
`
`Jo
`
`18
`
`The iationai approaches are directed at
`as not possible
`lead discovery It
`toxicity and sidc cifects anticipate transport
`with much accuracy to foretell
`fate of drug Once
`the inctabohc
`or predict
`lead is adcnti
`characteristics
`tied its structure can be modified until an effective drug is prepared
`
`II Drug Development Lead Modification
`
`Once your lead compound is in hand how do you know what
`order to improve the dcsircd ph umacological propea ties
`
`to modify in
`
`Identification of the Active Part The Pharmacophore
`
`hcre
`Interactions of drugs with receptors ire very specific see
`hapter
`small part of the lead compound may be involved in the appropn
`tore only
`the relevant groups on molecule that interact with
`ate interactions
`recep
`
`

`
`12
`
`Drug Discovery Des gn and Dave oprnent
`
`known
`tor and are rcsponsible for the activity are collectively
`as the
`pharma opJqj If the lead compound has additional groups they may inter
`with the appropriate interactions One approach to lead modification
`to
`cut away sections of the molecule in order to determine what parts are essen
`tial and which are superfluous
`As an example of how molecule can be trimmed and still
`result in in
`creased potency or modified activity consider the addictive analgetics mor
`phine 2J9
`CH3
`codeine 2.19
`and heroin
`COCH3 The pharmacophore is darkened If
`the dihydrofuran
`oxygen is excised morphinan 220
`results the hydroxy analog
`OH is
`levorphanol3 2.20
`times more potent than morphine as an
`to
`analelic but it rctdin the addictive properties Removal uf half of the eyIo
`hexene ring leaving only methyl substituents gives benzomorphan 2.21
`CH34 This compound shows some separation of analgetic and addic
`Live effects cyclazocine 221
`CH2
`and pentaiocme
`HCH
`are analogs with much lower addiction liabilities Cutting
`113
`away the cyclohexane fused ring L22 also has little effect on the analge tic
`activity in animal tests Removal of all fused rings for exampk in the case of
`mependine 223 Dcmerol1 gives an analgetic still possessing lOl29 of the
`overall pote ey of morphiue Even acyche analogs are active Dextropro
`cukn it
`poxyphcne 2.24 Ddrvun
`iz onehalf to twothirds as putvnL
`activity can be ascribed to the fact that it can assume
`conformation related
`to that of the morphine pharmacophore Another acyclac
`inalog as methadone
`2.25 which is as potent an analgetic as morphine the
`isomer is used in
`the treatment of opiord abstinence syndromes in heroin abusers
`
`CH3
`
`219
`
`\H
`
`113
`
`OH
`
`22O
`
`2.21
`
`2.22
`
`CF3
`
`113t1
`
`2.23
`
`2.24
`
`2.25
`
`

`
`Drug Deve opment Lead Modificabon
`
`13
`
`In some cases an increase in structural complexity and or rigidity can lead
`to increased potency or example an onpavine derivative such as ctorphiine
`H7 which has
`CH
`2.26
`two carbon bridge and ubstituent
`than morphine and there
`in morphine is about 1000 times more potent
`not
`fore is used in veterinary rnedicinc to immobilize lane anrma1s Fhe related
`CHz-
`analog buprenorphine 226
`ten Bu double bond re
`duced is 1020 times more potent
`very low level of
`than morphine and has
`rigidity of the oripavine do
`Apparently the additional
`dependence liability
`rivatives increases the appropriate receptor interactions see Chapter
`Once the pharmacophore is idcntified manipulation of functional groups
`becomes consequential
`
`HO
`
`228
`
`Functional Group Modification
`
`The importance of functional group modiheation was seen in Section 184
`the amino group of carbutainide 212
`NH2 was replaced by methyl
`Cl3 and in so doing the antibacterial
`group to give toEbutamide 2.12
`In some cases an
`activity was separated away from the antidiabetic activity
`experienced medicitni chemist knows what functional group will elicit
`par
`ticular effect ChkrthiaziJc 227 is an antihpcrtensie agent
`that has
`strong diuretic increased urine excretion effect as well It was known from
`suilTanilamide woik that
`the sulfonamide side chain can give diuretic activity
`see Section IIC Consequently diazoxide 2.28 was prepared as an antihy
`pertensive drug without diuretic activity
`There obviously is
`relationship between the molecular structure of
`compound and its activity This phenomenon was first realized Over 120 years
`ago
`
`I\1
`
`NH SO
`
`NH
`
`00
`
`Ci
`
`NH
`
`2.27
`
`2.28
`
`1i
`
`

`
`14
`
`ry
`
`Deve
`
`pr ent
`
`StructureActivity Relationships
`
`Ii 1b rum Brown ard Iraser
`tFat II
`quatc
`ry
`uspccti
`it mu ular ar ync
`ira may bc esponsitlc ft
`nina ucctJlar bloc mg flEect
`cxamincd
`ty
`of
`quitermied dksk ad
`nary ama oniu
`urnal
`salts
`in
`aes they concludcd that th physioloica acti in of
`naolec
`its chcmacal
`onstatution Shortly thcrcafter Rick ards
`of
`their mo cular
`activity of ahphatic alcohols was
`hypnoti
`tacit of
`fur
`wught Thcs ohs rvations are thc basis for iutur stru tare activity relation
`ships SAR
`1rugs can he classified as being structurally specific or stru turally non spe
`cafic Stru urally spec ftc drugs which most dir gs arc
`act at spec ific sites
`such as
`rcceptor or an nzymc Iherr act vaty
`tency
`ad
`ble to small cha ages In chemica strucU rc
`kculc
`tivatas tcnd to havc comr on structural
`no spcc tic satc
`action
`ay occur witf
`baoboga al ctivities
`anesthetics sedati
`
`no
`
`it
`
`roputi
`ik quater
`Irom ies
`tud
`fund on
`
`atcd hat abc
`
`ic
`
`fib
`
`ha of
`
`di
`
`faa
`
`drugs arc asecu
`aid di nfcctuat
`
`cry susdepti
`amilar hio ogacal
`Stru wn
`ro rs eq/I
`fcaturcs
`havc ba ci potc
`malar
`Exampi
`uctur
`tot cs nd rarity
`
`id ssu
`ty of
`va
`ad
`
`of thcs
`
`ala eptics
`
`ti
`
`at
`
`cit
`
`hr
`
`souatcd
`
`ath at
`
`oFcuk
`on
`thougt
`achy
`part
`okcula irodilic tions that could be
`aty their arc multiud cf
`adc
`ny
`SAR mdi
`th yn
`inpl mvolv
`1960s
`escs of
`th
`prior
`ny
`analogs as pos iWe of he Icad and thei
`to dct
`tIc effc
`of
`ity or po cncy Oncc cnou It
`str tcturc on acta
`ado
`pa cd and
`re
`saithcicrat data acc imul ted conclusions could It madc raardan sun tuic
`activity relationships
`An excellent cx4rnple of this approach carte from the dcvdopment of
`the
`numt cr of analogs of
`sulfonamide antibacterial agents sulfa drugs After
`the lead compound sullanilamick 2.1
`wcre prepared at was found
`that compounds of this general structure exhibited diuretic and antidiabetic
`activities as well as antimicrobial activity Compounds with each tye of
`activity eventually were shown to possess cntaiu structural teiture an com
`mon On the hais of the biological results of greater than 10 000 compound
`scveral SAR gencrahzations have been made
`ntnmcrohr ri agents have
`SO NHR or SO
`structure 229
`where
`the amin
`tn
`sulfonyl
`roups on thc benzcne rang should bc para
`thc anihno amino group may hr
`rcrnoved ir wo
`unsubstatutr.d as shown or may hav
`substitucnt
`that
`the hcntcnc ring by othr.r rang syatr.ms or thr introduction of
`rcphaceinr.nt ot
`
`NH
`
`29
`
`

`
`Drug Deveopment
`
`Lead Mod hcahon
`
`15
`
`additional cubstituents on it decreases the potency or abohshes the activity
`may be
`
`SO2
`
`NH2 SO
`
`NH2 NI2 NHR or
`
`but
`Nmonosubstttutaon
`the potency is reduced in most cases
`SO2NHR results in more potent compounds and the potency increases wiTh
`SO NR
`heteroaro natic substitution and
`in gen
`disubstitutron
`eral leads to inactive compounds
`Antidiabetic agents are compounds with structure 2.30 where may be
`or
`incorporated into heteroaromatic structure such as
`thiadiazole or
`urea or thioura In the case of
`pyrimidine or in an acyclic structure such as
`ureas the N2 should carry as
`two carbon
`subtituent
`chain of at
`least
`atoms 20
`
`SON
`
`30
`
`two general
`typrs Ii diochio
`Sulfonamide diuretics are of
`structural
`rothiazides 2.31 and the high ceiling type 2.32 The former compounds
`have
`is an clectronega
`disulfamyl groups on the benzene ring and
`five group such as Cl Cl3 or NHR
`he high ceiling compounds contain
`is Cl Ph or Phi where may
`carboxy groups Suhstitucnt
`suit unyl
`or NH and
`and is nor naliy NHR
`be
`can be at position
`or
`OR or SR
`Fhc sulfonamide example is strong evidenec
`th
`notion that
`to support
`correlation does exist between structure and activity but how do you know
`what molecular modifications to mike in order
`to fine tune the bad corn
`pound
`
`o2
`
`NHSO2
`
`oo
`
`231
`
`NHSO2
`
`CO
`
`232
`
`Structure Modifications to Increase Potency and Therapeutic
`
`Index
`
`In the preceding scetion it was made clear that structure modifications were
`the keys to activity and potency manipulations After years of structure
`activity relationship studies various standard molecular modification ap
`
`

`
`18
`
`DrLIg Discovery Design and Devopment
`
`proaches have been developed for the systematic improvement of the thera
`peutzc index also called the therapaaic ratio which is measure of the ratio
`ofiindcirabJe to desirable drug effects For in UIVu systems the therapeutic
`the LD the lethal dose for 50% of the test
`index could be the ratio of
`animals to the ED0 the effective dose that produces the maximum therapeu
`in 50% of the test animals The largcr the therapeutic index the
`tic effect
`greater the margin of safety of the compound
`number of these structural
`modification methodologies follow
`
`Hotnoogatkrn
`
`group of compounds that differ by ntant unit
`hurau1ugoi erie is
`H2 group As will become more apparent in Section IIE biologi
`generally
`cal properties of homologous compounds show regularities of increase and
`decrease For many series of compounds lengthening of
`saturated carbon
`side chain from one methyl to five to rune atoms pentyl to nonyl produces
`sudden
`an increase in pharmacological effects further lengthening results in
`decrease in potency Fig LI In Section IIF2b it will be shown that this
`phenomenon corresponds to increased hpophihcity of the molecule which
`permits penetration into cell membranes until
`its lowered watet solubility
`hcomcs prublematie in aa tranpurt thruugh dqucuu mcdid In th Cnc uf
`at about
`aliphatic amrncs another problem is micclk formation which begin
`This effectivly removes the compound from potential
`interaction with
`the appropriate receptors One of if not the earliest example of this potency
`versus chain length phenomenon was reported by Richardson8 who was
`
`10
`
`11
`
`Chain Length
`
`Figure 21 Genera effect of carbon chain ength on drug potency
`
`

`
`Drug Deveopment
`
`Lead Modficatior
`
`17
`
`on Potency Antbacterab Actvdy of
`Table 21 Eftact of dhaln Length
`4-nAlkyresorcrno1s and Spasmolyhc Activtty of Mandeate EstOb
`
`o1
`
`oft
`
`cuo
`
`Phenol coeffk ent
`
`Spaurolync activity
`
`metyt
`
`cthy
`
`abutyl
`
`apeiii
`
`pL4
`
`mdc
`
`opi
`
`bin
`
`anyt
`
`22
`
`Si
`
`30
`
`27
`
`07
`
`08
`
`28
`
`30
`
`90
`
`22
`
`09
`
`85
`
`28
`
`Relatwe to 335 tnmethyeyclohexano set at 100%
`
`investigating the hypnotic activity of tlcohols ftc maximum eftcct occurrcd
`thcn th potency dcchned upon chain Iengthcnmg
`hcxanol to
`octanol
`fot
`until no activity was observed for hexadecanol
`study by Dohme el aLl2a on
`alkyl substituted resorcinol derivatives
`showed that the peak antibacterial activity occurred with
`hexvlresorcinol
`compound now used as
`see Table 2.1
`vanety of
`topical anesthetic
`in
`throat lozenges Funcke ci al 22b found that the peak spasinolytic activity of
`nonyl ester see T%ble 2.1
`series of mandelate esters occurred with the
`
`

`
`18
`
`ug Discovery Design aid Deveopmert
`
`Chain Brandiing
`
`is
`
`When
`sin plc hpophilic rclationship is irr portant as described above thcn
`chain brarchin lowers the potency of
`compound This phenomenon
`exemplified by tlc lower potency of the compounds having isoalkyl chms in
`Chain branching also yin interfere with receptor binding For cx
`able
`ample phenethylamine Ph HC NH is an excellent substrate for mono
`oxidase flavin contammg but
`amine oxidase
`rnethy1phencthyl
`poor substrate Pnmary amines often arc more
`amine amphetamine is
`than secondary ammcs which arc more potent
`than tertiary amines
`potent
`For example the intimalariaJ drug primaquine 233 is much more potent
`than its secondary or tertiary amine homologs
`Major pharmrcological changes can occur with chain branching and homol
`When
`onsider the 10 aminoalkyiphenothiazines 2.34
`ogation
`CH H3N
`promethazine or CH2CHNCH3 diethazinc anti
`spasmodic and antihistaminic activities predominate However
`the homolog
`being CH CH CII2NC1132 piomaiine has greatly reduced anti
`2.34 with
`spasmodic and antihistaminic activities but sedative and tranquilizing activi
`ties are greatly enhanced
`In the case of the branched chain analog 2.34 with
`to CH2CH H3CII2NCH32 trimeprazine the tranquilizing activity is
`equal
`reduced and antipruritic anti
`itch activity increases
`
`is
`
`H3O
`
`NFI HCH
`
`33
`
`234
`
`Ring Chain Transforniation
`
`Another modification that can be made is the transformation of AIkyl sub sti
`tu nts into cyclic analogs onsidcr the promazines again 2.34 Chlorprorna
`H2CH2NCH3J
`Cl
`Cl
`and 2.34
`line
`
`CH2CH2CH
`
`Tnmc.prazine
`line
`
`are
`
`equivalent
`
`as
`
`tranquilizers in
`
`animal
`
`tests
`
`CH2CHCH3CH2NCH32
`H2
`
`and methdila
`
`have similar antipruritic activity
`
`H3
`
`H2
`man
`
`

`
`Drug Devopment
`
`Lead Modiffcaton
`
`19
`
`Diffcrent activities can result from ring chain transformation as well For
`the dimethylamino group of chiorpromazine is substituted by
`example if
`
`merhylpiperatlue ring 234
`
`ii
`
`UH2CHICHN\
`
`JNCHJ proW
`
`nausea and vomiting activity is
`chloiperanne the antiemetic prevents
`greatly enhanced In this case however an additional amino group is added
`
`Bioisostedsxn
`
`Bioisostere are substituents or groups that have chemical or physical sunilar
`ities and which produce broadly similar biological properties2 Bioisostensm
`lead modification approach that has been shown to be useful to atenuate
`is
`lead and it may have
`toxicity or to modify the activity of
`significant role in
`the alteration of metabolism of
`lead There are classical
`isosteres242 and
`In 1925 Grimm2 formulated the hydride displace
`nonelassical
`isosteres
`law to describe similarities between groups that have the same number
`meni
`of valence electrons but may have
`different number of atoms 1rlenmneyer28
`later redefined isosteres as atoms ions or molecules in which the peripheral
`layers of electrons can be considered to be identical These two definitions
`describe classical Lostere examples are shown in Table 22 Nonclassical
`
`Table 22 Class cal sosteres
`
`Urnvaknt atuma and groups
`CH NH OH
`CI
`bCI
`PH
`SH
`Br Pr
`dl
`IOu
`Biv lent
`turns and groupe
`CH
`NH
`OC
`CONHR
`ores and groups
`
`rivalent
`
`CII
`
`As
`
`etravaknt
`
`turns
`
`COR
`
`05k
`
`Ring equwalcnts
`CII CII
`CH
`
`eg naerp tluophene
`berzcne pynthrie
`CH
`NH
`
`Ce
`
`tetrahydrofuran
`
`tetrahvdrotl
`
`tophene
`cyclopentane pyrrolidine
`
`

`
`Tabe23
`
`ste
`
`E7
`
`dl
`
`Nt
`
`dm
`
`NN
`
`Nd
`
`Pp
`
`Mpdrp
`
`Nt
`
`NE
`
`

`
`Drug Devc1opmet Lead Modif ation
`
`21
`
`do not havc the same number of atoms and do not fit
`bwzo3ter
`and electronic rules of the classical
`isosteres but they do produec
`in biological activity Examples of these are shown in Table
`Ruig chain tI4rIsfoLmatun iO can be considcicd tu bc iwttric inter
`changes There are hundreds of examples of compounds that differ by
`some examples are shown in Table
`Bioisos
`bioisosteric interchange2326
`the sulfw atom of
`terismn also can
`lead to changes
`If
`in activity
`phenothiaiine neuroleptic drugs 234 is replaced by the
`bioisosteres then dibenzazepine antidepressant drugs 235
`Cli CH2
`result
`
`the steric
`
`similarity
`
`the
`
`or
`
`235
`
`It
`
`is actually quite surprising that bmoisosterism should be such
`success
`ful approach to lead modification Perusal of Table 22 and especially of Table
`makes it clear that in making
`biolsosteric replacement one or more of
`the following parameters will change size shape electronic distribution
`lipid solubilLty water solubihty pK chenucal
`reactivity and hydiogen
`to thc it uf aCtiun thc motciact with it
`drug mut gvt
`bundmg Bccaue
`modifications made to molecule may have one or more of
`see Chapter
`the following effects
`
`Structural
`
`If
`
`replaced by
`
`biomsostere has
`
`structural
`
`then size
`
`If
`
`If
`
`the moiety that
`role in holding other functionalities in
`particular geometry
`shape and hydrogen bonding will he Important
`the moiety replaced is involved in
`interactions
`Receptor
`specific
`interaction with
`receptor or enlyrre then all of the parameters except
`lipid and water solubdity will be important
`harmacokinetmcs
`for absorption
`the moiety replaced is necessary
`transport and excretion collectively with metabolism termed pharma
`eokinrucm of the compound then lipophilicity hydrophihcity pK and
`hydrogen bonding will be irnpoi Cant
`Metabolism if
`the moiety replaced is involved in blocking or aiding
`metabolism then the chemical meactivic will be import itt
`
`It
`
`is
`
`ecause of these subtle changes that hmorsosterism is effective
`this
`approach allows the medicinal chemist to tinker with only some of he param
`zfl urder to ugmnt the poten ckctimty
`tti
`and lurator
`actioi and
`to reduce toxicity Multiple alterations may be necessary
`to counterbalance
`involved in binding
`or example if modification of
`effects
`functionality
`also decreases the lipophiheity of the molecule thereby reducing its ab lity to
`
`

`
`Table 24
`
`xar etB os si
`
`ri
`
`%al
`
`Neurokph
`
`tantpsyn9h
`
`coy
`
`dDeveoprrert
`
`Anti nflarnmtory agents
`
`H3
`
`UI
`
`Ktha
`
`NiH
`
`SN
`
`ilv
`
`AntUiistamiues
`
`NHOCH2
`
`

`
`Drug Deveopment
`
`Lead Modthcation
`
`23
`
`penetrate cdl walls and cross other membranes the molecule can be substi
`tuted with additional bpophihc groups at sites distant from that involved with
`binding Modifications of this sort may change the overall naolccular
`shape
`and rcsult
`in another activity
`Up to this point we have been discussing more or lcss random molecular
`lead in 1868 Crum Brown
`modifications to make qualitative diffuences in
`relationship betwen
`and Jraser predicted that some day mathematical
`structure and activity would be expressed It was not until almost 100 years
`new era in drug design was
`this prediction began to be realized and
`later that
`born In 1962 orwin Hansch attempted to quantify the effects of particular
`substituent modifications and from this quantitative structure activity rd
`tionship QSAR studies dcv e1oped
`
`Quantitative StructureActivity Relationships
`
`Historicat
`
`The concept of quantitative drug design is based on the fact that th bioIogieaI
`function of its ptythoehemkal paratneteri
`compound are
`properties of
`thai is physical properties such as solubility Ilpophilicimy electronic effects
`profound influence on the chem
`ionization and stereochemistry that Ii
`ive
`istry of the compounds The first attempt to relate
`physicochemical pararne
`He observed
`pharmacological effect was
`sported in 1893 by Richet
`tel to
`the narcotic action of group of orginic compounds was inversely related
`that
`to their water solubility Jrehets rule Overton
`and Meyer32 related tadpole
`narcosis induced by
`series of nonioniied compounds added to the water hi
`which the
`idpoles were swimming to the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket