throbber
STEEP SUBTHRESHOLD CHARACTERISTIC AND ENHANCED TRANSCONDUCTANCE
`OF
`FULLY-RECESSED OXIDE (TRENCH) ISOLATED 1/4 pm WIDTH MOSFETS
`
`N. SHIGYO, T. WADA, S. FUKUDA, K. HIEDA, T. HAMAMOTO,
`H. WATANABE, K. SUNOUCHI and H. TANGO
`
`VLSI Research Center, Toshiba Corporation
`1, Komukai-Toshiba-cho, Kawasaki-shi, 210 Japan
`
`ABSTRACT
`This paper describes the dependence of MOSFET gate-
`controllability on the field isolation scheme. It is found that
`a fully-recessed oxide (trench) isolated MOSFET has a sharp
`cutoff characteristic and high transconductance in comparison
`with a non-recessed one. These features of the fully-recessed
`oxide MOSFET are due to the crowding of the gate’s fring-
`ing field at the channel edge. It is also found that the gate
`and diffused line capacitances for the fully-recessed oxide
`isolation are small so that high switching speed operation can
`be expected.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Reduction of the field isolation area is a major concern in
`achieving a high performance and high packing density
`VLSI. Several bird’s-beak free isolation methods have been
`proposed, e.g., BOX [1],[2] and SWAMI [31. However,
`lower submicron device characteristics in relation to the field
`isolation scheme have been seldomly reported.
`In previous works [1]-[lo], attention has been paid mainly
`to the threshold voltage dependence on the field isolation
`scheme. It was found that the MOSFET threshold voltage
`and subthreshold characteristic strongly depended on the field
`isolation scheme. In a non-recessed oxide MOSFET shown
`in Fig. 1 (a), the threshold voltage becomes higher with de-
`creasing channel width, the so-called narrow-channel effect
`[4],[5]. This results from the extra bulk charge stored under
`a thick oxide region. In a fully-recessed oxide MOSFET
`shown in Fig. 1 (b), however, the threshold voltage becomes
`lower for the narrower width case, which is referred to as the
`inverse narrow-channel effect [6]-[9]. This phenomenon
`is
`explained by the crowding of the gate’s fringing field at
`the
`channel edge due to its convex shape, as shown in Fig, 1 (b).
`It was also reported that an anomalous subthreshold current
`hump can be
`observed for a fully-recessed oxide MOSFET
`due to the parasitic edge MOSFET [1],[3],[10]. However,
`there has been no publication concerning the dependence of
`gate-controllability on the field oxide scheme,
`The purpose of this paper is to investigate which field
`isolation scheme is advisable for 1/4 pm feature size VLSIs
`from the viewpoint of device performance, such as the
`subthreshold swing S and the transconductance gm, using a
`
`three-dimensional
`[61,[71,~101,~111.
`
`device
`
`simulator
`
`TOPMOST
`
`EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
`A series of trench and LOCOS isolated MOSFETs have
`been fabricated.
`Figure 2 shows the experimental results of the subthres-
`S which is defined by dVG/d(logID). The
`hold swing
`effective channel length Leff is 10 pm and drain voltage VD
`is 0.05 V to eliminate the short-channel effect. For LOCOS
`isolation, the subthreshold swing is almost constant for chan-
`nel widths down to the submicron region. On the other hand,
`the subthreshold swing of the fully-recessed oxide (trench)
`MOSFET is decreased with a reduction of the channel width,
`Le., the fully recessed oxide MOSFET has a steep subthres-
`hold characteristic.
`
`THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
`Two typical isolation schemes shown in Fig. 1 are used
`to analyze the field
`isolation scheme dependent MOSFET
`characteristics.
`Subthreshold Swing S
`Figure 3
`three-dimensionally simulated
`the
`shows
`subthreshold swing dependence on the channel width. Simu-
`lations are carried out for the effective channel length Leff =
`0.05 V to eliminate the short-
`2um and drain voltage V
`P.=
`channel effect. It is exhlblted that the
`fully-recessed oxide
`MOSFET has a small subthreshold swing, Le., a sharp cutoff
`characteristic. This is due to the large depletion layer at the
`channel edge, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1 (b), which
`results from the gate’s fringing field. A small depletion
`capacitance Cd results in a small subthreshold swing S, since
`the subthreshold swing S is approximately proportional to
`l+C /Cox [12], as shown in Fig. 4 (a).
`gigure 5 shows the dependence of the subthreshold swing
`S on the gate oxide thickness tox. This figure suggests that,
`for a 0.25 pm channel width, a 12 nm gate oxide fully-
`recessed MOSFET is equivalent to a 6 nm gate oxide non-
`recessed one in regard to the subthreshold swing. It should
`be noted that the subthreshold swing S linearly depends on
`the gate oxide thickness tox in accordance with the equation
`shown in the inset of Fig. 5.
`
`636-IEDM 87
`
`28.3
`
`$1.00 0 1987 IEEE
`~~2515-5~8710000-0636
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2024
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2024
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`

`

`A short-channel MOSFET with Leff = 0.3 pm is exam-
`ined, as shown in Fig. 6. Even for the short-channel case,
`the subthreshold swing of the fully-recessed MOSFET is
`smaller than that of
`the non-recessed one. The slope of the
`S-tox characteristic becomes steeper mainly due to an in-
`crease in substrate concentration, i.e., an increase of Cd. No
`significant short-channel effect is observed for the fully-
`recessed oxide MOSFET, because the influence of the drain
`to the channel is weakened by its high gate-controllability.
`
`Transconductance gm
`Figure 7 shows the gm-VG characteristics, which are
`simulated using the
`field dependent mobility model [13].
`The gm peak value of the fully-recessed oxide MOSFET is
`higher than that
`of the non-recessed one. The reason for a
`high gm peak is the small Cd of the fully-recessed oxide
`MOSFET, which can be explained by an analytical model of
`over
`gm as shown in Fig. 4 (b). A hump of gm for t
`QX
`20nm can be seen, which corresponds to the parasitlc
`edge
`MOSFET [lo].
`
`Countermeasures for the Low Threshold Voltage Vth
`A drawback of the fully-recessed oxide MOSFET is its
`low threshold voltage, which may cause a leakage drain
`current at VG = 0 V. However, the leakage current is not as
`large as that inferred from the inverse narrow-channel effect,
`because of its steep subthreshold characteristic. In addition,
`the threshold voltage can be improved by sidewall implanta-
`tion [l], [lo],
`tapering the sidewall [7] and rounding the
`so
`corner edge. However, these approaches cause high Cd
`that the gate-controllability is reduced.
`An appropriate
`choice of the gate material, e.g., tungsten, is most
`favorable,
`since its midgap work
`function results in a desired threshold
`voltage without the need for channel implant into n- and p-
`channel devices
`[14] without losing
`its high gate-
`controllability. It should be noted that the
`origin for the
`lower threshold voltage of an n-channel MOSFET is the use
`of an n+ poly-si gate.
`
`Circuit Operation Speed
`the fully-recessed oxide
`The gate capacitance CG of
`MOSFET is about 20 % smaller than that of the non-recessed
`one due to the smaller Cd. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 8,
`the diffused line capacitance Cdiffused line of the fully-
`recessed oxide isolation is also 20 % smaller than that of the
`non-recessed one, which agrees with the
`experiments [2].
`These small C and Cdiffused line with a high transconduc-
`G
`result in 40 % higher circuit operation compared
`tance gm
`with the non-recessed case, when the operation speed is sim-
`-1
`(CG + Cdiffused line).
`ply estimated by gm
`
`CONCLUSION
`The dependence of gate-controllability on the field isola-
`tion scheme has been
`analyzed. Advantages of the fully-
`recessed oxide isolation are summarized in Fig. 9. Small de-
`
`due to the gate’s fringing field,
`pletion capacitance C
`results in small S, higf gm and
`small CG. Because of its
`structure, Cdiffu e
`line is also small. These lead to excel-
`lent gate-controflaklity and high speed circuit operation.
`These features push a fully-recessed oxide isolation to the
`main stream for lower submicron VLSIs.
`A drawback of the fully-recessed oxide MOSFET is its
`low threshold voltage. However, the origin for the lower
`threshold voltage of an n-channel MOSFET is the use of an
`n+ poly-Si gate. Owing to the high gate-controllability, the
`threshold voltage strongly reflects the gate material. The use
`of an tungsten gate realizes the desired threshold voltage
`without the need for channel implant into n- and p-channel
`devices while preserving the high gate-controllability. The
`adoption of the fully-recessed oxide (trench) isolation with
`tungsten gate CMOS is one of the most promising device
`features for the 1/4 pm VLSI era.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`The authors wish to thank Y. Oowaki, H. Ishiuchi, M.
`Kakumu, Dr. T. Iizuka and Prof. R. Dang for their helpful
`discussions on this work. Appreciation is extended to M.
`Kashiwagi for his support and encouragement.
`
`REFERENCES
`[l] K-Kurosawa, TShibata and H.Iizuka, IEDM Tech. Dig.,
`pp. 384-387, 1981.
`[2] TShibata, et al., IEDM Tech. Dig., pp. 27-30, 1983.
`[3] T.Iizuka, K.Y.Chiu and J.L.Mol1, IEDM Tech. Dig., pp.
`380-383, 1981.
`[4] K.O.Jeppson, Electronics Letters, 11, pp. 297-299, 1975.
`[SI L.A.Akers and J.J.Sanchez, Solid-St. Electron., 25, pp.
`621-641, 1982.
`[6] N.Shigyo, M.Konaka and R.Dang, Electronics Letters,
`18, pp. 274-275, 1982.
`[7] N.Shigyo, M.Konaka and R.Dang, IECE Japan, J66-C,
`pp. 1035-1040, 1983 (in Japanese).
`[8] M.Sugino and L.A.Akers, IEEE Trans. Electron Device
`Letters, EDL-4, pp. 114-1 15, 1983.
`[9] P.T.Lai and Y.C.Cheng, Solid-St. Electron., 28, pp. 551-
`554, 1985.
`[lo] N.Shigyo and R.Dang, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices,
`ED-32, pp. 441-445, 1985.
`[ 111 N.Shigyo and R.Dang, in: Process and Device Modeling
`(W.L.Eng1, Ed.), North-Holland, 1985, pp. 301-327.
`[12] S.M.Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (2nd Ed.),
`1981.
`[13] K.Yamaguchi, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-30,
`pp. 658-663,1983.
`[14] B.Devari, et al., Roc. VLSI Symp., pp. 61-62, 1987.
`
`28.3
`
`IEDM 87-637
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`-W-
`
`+W-
`
`I
`
`Non - Recessed
`
`I
`
`Si
`
`Fully-Recessed
`
`Fig. 1 (a) Non- and (b) fully-recessed oxide MOSFETs. The depletion capa-
`citance Cd of the fully-recessed oxide MOSFET is small due to the
`gate's fringing field.
`
`100
`
`I \
`
`- - - Non-Receered
`
`- o- Semi-Recessed (LOCOS)
`Experiments [
`-*-Fully-Recessed (TRENCH)
`
`I
`0
`
`I
`1
`
`I
`2
`
`I
`I
`4
`3
`Weff (pm)
`Fig. 2 Experimental results of subthreshold swing for trench
`and LOCOS isolations. The trench isolated MOS-
`E T has a small subthreshold swing, i.e., a steep
`subthreshold characteristic.
`
`A
`
`"
`
`I
` 10
`
`Vo
`
`*O.O5V
`I
`3
`
`I
`4
`
`0
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`2
`W (prn)
`Fig. 3 Dependences of subthreshold swing on channel
`width and substrate bias.
`
`Linear Region
`
`VG
`
`Subthreshold Region
`
`ID : 90-
`
`01 q D L
`nS
`
`d (log 1,)
`-I
`= [ T I
`
`
`
`I
`
`I
`
`kT
`
`=,In
`
`where
`
`cd
`IO (I+-)
`cox
`q
`where nS =ni eiiT"**-+n#'
`(a>
`Fig. 4 Analytical model of (a) subthreshold swing and (b) transconductance.
`Both S and gm depend on Cd. Small Cd results in small S and high gm.
`
`(depletion)
`
`(strong inversion)
`
`638-IEDM 87
`
`28.3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`s 120
`8
`
`/
`
`80
`5 70
`f 60
`
`v)
`
`50
`
`,
`
`0
`
`20
`30
`IO
`Gate Oxide Thickness tox (nm)
`Fig. 6 Dependence of subthreshold swing on oxide thick-
`ness for Leff = 0.3 pm.
`
`3
`
`--- Non-Recessed
`- Fully-Recesmd
`
`'\
`
`N ~ D m 5 X 10'o~-'
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`( c ) O
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`I
` 3 4
`2
`5
`6
`Reverse Bias Voltage VR ( V I
`(a) Non- and (b) fully-recessed oxide
`diffused line and (c) its capacitances.
`
`P
`
`isolated
`
`Fig. 8
`
`50
`
`0
`
`Fig. 5 Dependence of subthreshold swing on oxide thick-
`ness for Leff = 2 pm.
`
`0
`
`I
`
`- Fully-Recessed
`--- Non-Recessed
`W = 0.25prn
`L e f f = 0.3pm
`X j =0,15prn
`Nsu~=2xlO'~cm-'
`VD *O.O5V
`
`0
`
`0.5
`
`1.5
`
`2
`
`I
`VG (v)
`Fig. 7 Field isolation scheme dependent transconductance
`for Leff = 0.3 pm. The gm peak value of the fully-
`of the
`recessed oxide MOSFET is higher than that
`non-recessed one.
`
`Fig. 9 Advantages of fully-recessed oxide isolation.
`
`28.3
`
`IEDM 87-639
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket