throbber

`
`IEEE 1993 Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting 3.3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A Trench Isolation Process for BiCMOS Circuits
`
`
`
`Stephen Poon and Craig Lage
`
`
`
`
`
`Advanced Products Fiesearch and Development Laboratory, Motorola Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3501 Ed Bluestein Blvd., Austin, Texas 78721
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`
`A new isolation process using 1 pm deep trench is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`developed for BiCMOS circuits. Well behaved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOSFETs and NPN devices with excellent parasitic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`performance were achieved. Low leakage diodes with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`butted junctions were demonstrated by inclusion of an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oxidation barrier in the trench liner and utilizing a Ge02
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`doped oxide with matched thermal coefficient of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`expansion to the silicon substrate for trench fill.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Planarity for arbitrary width isolation was obtained by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`using oxide FtlE followed by chemical-mechanical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`polishing.
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`
`Trench isolation has been reported since the early
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1980's as a replacement for LOCOS isolation for VLSI.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, process complexity associated with french
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technology has restricted its appeal to a limited number
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of circuit applications while continuous modifications
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and improvements to LOCOS has enabled its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`implementation in a proposed 16 Mbit fast SRAM cell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with 1 pm active pitch [1]. Nevertheless, LOCOS is not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`expected to scale significantly beyond 1 pm pitch due
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to its intrinsic limitations such as field oxide thinning,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bird's beak encroachment,
`lack of planarity, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`punchthrough. As a result, trench isolation is required
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to meet the demands of ULSI. However, a relatively
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`simple process with sufficient benefits must be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`developed to gain wide acceptance.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In this paper, a single isolation process utilizing a 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pm deep trench with arbitrary width is proposed for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BiCMOS circuits to avoid the complexity of shallow and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deep trench isolation typically employed in high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`performance BiCMOS technology [2]. A schematic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`representation of the structure is shown in Figure 1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Latchup immunity,
`intrawell and interwell isolations,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reduced parameter capacitance, as well as bipolar
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parasitic reduction are simultaneously satisfied with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proposed structure. The processing technique used
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to fabricate this structure and the electrical results
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`achieved are described.
`
`
`
`FABRICATION
`
`
`The process platform was adopted from a 0.5 pm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BiCMOS technology developed for 4 Mbit fast SRAMs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[3]. Epi thickness is optimized to ensure up—diffusion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from the buried layers to merge with the trench bottom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to obtain the desired isolation and parasitic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characteristics. A hard mask is used to protect the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`active regions for etching of a 1 pm depth trench into
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the substrate. Both thermal oxide and composite
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thermal oxide/deposited nitride trench liners were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`evaluated along with several chemical vapor deposited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oxides to determine the most suitable combination of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CH3315-9/93/0000(0045)$1.00 © 1993 IEEE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`processes to minimize defect generation in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate and to minimize seam or void formation in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`narrow width trenches.
`
`
`
`A combination of oxide RIE and chemical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mechanical polishing process [4,5] is used for the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`planarization of arbitrary width trench. A schematic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cross section of the planarization process sequence is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shown in Figure 2. Compared to [4], this planarization
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sequence has a reduced number of process steps and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`has replaced the more complex planarization etchback
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`process with an oxide RlE process. At this point, M08
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and bipolar devices were fabricated using previously
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reported processes [3] to evaluate the merit of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proposed structure.
`
`
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`
`
`Transistor characteristics were measured on both
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CMOS and non-self—aligned NPN devices. Typical 0.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pm Wdrawn subthreshold characteristics are shown in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 3. Both n- and p- channel devices exhibit ideal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`behavior with no degradation of the subthreshold
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`slope. A Gummel plot for 0.8 um emitter NPN is shown
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in Figure 4.
`Functional BiCMOS and ECL ring
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oscillators were also achieved.
`
`
`
`
`
`Field punchthrough voltage on intrawell and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`interwell isolation structures are shown in Figure 5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Flesults measured on trench isolated structures were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`independent of field width and are well above 10 volts.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Holding voltage for latchup and parasitic bipolar gain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are improved compared to a PBL isolation control
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because current path in the substrate is interrupted by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the trench bottom reaching into up-diffusion from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`buried layer. These results are shown in Figures 6 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7. respectively. A SEM micrograph which illustrates this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is shown in Figure 8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Deposited oxides are typically known to create
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`voids and weak seams in narrow width and high aspect
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ratio trenches after wet strips/cleans due to poor step
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`coverage. However, this problem is improved with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ozone enhanced depositions
`[6,7] and ECR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deposited films. Leakage current measured between
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gate poly combs in an on-pitch array for two different
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oxide trench fill is shown in Figure 9. A TEM cross
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`section micrograph showing planar and defect-free
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isolation trench is shown in Figure 10.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in order to alleviate stress induced leakage caused
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by substrate defects due to oxidation and other
`thermal processes in 1 pm deep oxide filled trench,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`composite thermal oxide/CVD nitride trench liner [8,9]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and trench fill with matched thermal coefficient
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`expansion to the substrate [6] were evaluated. Stress
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 0f 4
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1048
`
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1048
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IEEE 1993 Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting 3.3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[6] J. Bell, 8. Fisher, K. Maeda, and S. Poon,
`
`
`
`
`
`'Characterization of Germanium Doping in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TEOS/Ozone Films for Trench Fill Applications',
`Schumacher Dielectrics and CVD Metallization
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Symp. Proceedings, February,1993.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[7] J.P. West, H.W. Fry, and S. Poon, 'The Application
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of APCVD/Ozone Thin Films in S 0.5 pm lC
`Fabrication: Trench and Inter-metal Isolation and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Gap Fill', SPIE International Symposium on
`
`
`
`
`Microelectronic Processing, September, 1993.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[8] CW. Teng, C. Slawinski, and W.R. Hunter, 'Defect
`Generation in Trench isolation“,
`lEDM Technical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Digest, pp. 586 ~ 589, 1984.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[9] SR. Stiffler, J.B. Lasky, C.W. Koburger, and W.S.
`
`
`
`
`
`Berry,
`'Oxidation-lnduced Defect Generation in
`Advanced DRAM Structures', lEEE Trans. Electron
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Devices, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1253 - 1258, 1990.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[1] JD. Hayden, M.P. Woo, R.C. Taft, P. Pelley, B.-Y.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nguyen, C. Mazure, P.U. Kenkare, K. Kemp, R.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subrahmanyan, A.R. Sitaram, J-H. Lin, J. K0, C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`King, C. Gunderson, and H.C. Kirsch,
`'A High-
`
`
`
`
`
`Performance Quadruple Well, Quadruple Poly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BiCMOS Process for Fast 16Mb SRAMs',
`IEDM
`
`
`
`
`
`Technical Digest, pp. 819 - 822, 1992.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[2] G.G. Shahidi, J. Warnock, B. Davari, B. Wu, Y. Taur,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C. Wong, CL. Chen, M. Rodriguez, D.D. Tang, K.
`Jenkins, P.A. McFarland, R. Schulz, D. Zicherman,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`P. Coane, D. Klaus, J.Y.C. Sun, M. Polcari, and TH.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ning,
`'A High Performance BiCMOS Technology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Using 0.25 pm CMOS and Double Poly 47 GHz
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bipolar', VLSl Tech. Symp. Digest, pp. 28 - 29,
`1992.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[3] TC Mele, J. Hayden, F. Walczyk, M. Lien, Y.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`See, D. Denning, S. Cosentino, and AH. Perera, 'A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`High Performance 0.5 pm BiCMOS Triple
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Polysilicon Technology for 4Mb Fast SRAMs', IEDM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Technical Digest, pp. 481 - 484, 1990.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[4] B. Davari, C.W. Koburger, R. Schulz, J.D. Warnock,
`T. Furukawa, M. Jost, Y. Taur, W.G. Schwittek, J.K.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DeBrosse, M.L. Kerbaugh, and J.L. Mauer, 'A New
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Planarization Technique, Using a Combination of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RIE and Chemical Mechanical Polish (CMP)‘ lEDM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Technical Digest, pp. 61 — 64, 1989.
`[5] S. Poon, A. Gelatos, A.H. Perera, and M. Hoffman,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'A Manufacturable Chemical-Mechanical Polish
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Technology with a Novel Low-Permittivity Stop—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Layer for Oxide Polishing', VLSl Tech. Symp.
`
`
`
`
`
`Digest, pp. 115 - 116, 1993.
`
`measurement obtained on oxide trench fill film doped
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with Ge02 is shown in Figure 11. Leakage measured
`on butted diodes with and without nitride liner are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compared in Figure 12.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Gate oxide thinning at the trench corner which can
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`degrade intrinsic dielectric breakdown was avoided by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`careful optimization of the process module. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`results are shown in Figure 14.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A simple trench isolation process that can
`
`
`
`
`
`simultaneously satisfy several
`requirements for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`submicron BiCMOS circuits
`is proposed and
`described. Well-behaved devices with excellent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isolation and parasitic characteristics are demonstrated.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The authors wish to thank Phil Tobin, Asanga
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Perera, Fred Walczyk, David Burnett, Hsing Tseng,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeff Lutze, and Jerry Sebek for technical discussions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and measurements. Process support from Jung-Hui
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lin, Kent Cooper, and the pilot
`line personnel of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APRDL. Vendor support
`from Mel Hoffman of
`Westech, Jeff Bell of QTl, Todd Curtis of Watkins-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Johnson, and the ECR process engineering team of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lam Research are sincerely appreciated. Rick Sivan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Lou Parrillo are acknowledged for their managerial
`
`support.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`
`
`46
`
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`IEEE 1993 Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting 3.3
`
`Nitride/Pad Oxide
`l
`I Deposited Oxide l
`
`I
`
`—
`
`Reverse Density
`Photoresist
`
`Oxide RIE
`
`CMP
`
`Fig. 2 Planarization Process Sequence
`
`1E-3
`
`1E-5
`
`1E-7
`
`1E—9
`
`1E-1 1
`
`,/
`
`0
`
`-0.3
`
`-0.6
`
`-O.9
`
`-1.2
`
`-1.5
`
`VE (V)
`
`Fig. 4 Bipolar Characteristics
`
` (Holding
`
`Voltage
`< 2 V)
`
`Fig. 6 Latch-Up Characteristics
`
`47
`
`PMOS
`
`NMOS
`
`BIPOLAR
`
`Oxide Filed Trench
`
`Deep M
`
`P SUBSTRATE
`
`Fig. 1 Trench Isolated BiCMOS Architecture
`
`|D(A)
`
`'
`1E-11
`
`E
`
`SLOPE =
`35.3 mV/dec
`
`1E-
`
`13 83.9 mV/dec
`-1.8
`-0.9
`
`‘ y
`0
`VG (V)
`Fig. 3 M08 Subthreshold Characteristics
`
`|VD|=0.1,5 V
`0.9
`1.8
`
`INTERWELL
`
`INTRAWELL
`fig.
`.
`a.
`
`
`
` 3
`
`..u Fo‘ 1.8
`
`VpgncgthroughLV)_#m0:~4Oto
`
`.8
`
`.63 1
`
`1
`i
`2
`Field Space (pun)
`Field Space (pmfi
`Fig. 5 Field Punchihrougi Voltage
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IEEE 1993 Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting 3.3
`
`
`
`Ozone oxide
`
`
`
`“IL-nu“
`
`I“ I
`
`0
`
`
`03a:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Percent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Percent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II‘I‘I‘.“
`
`“um
`
`
`
`“‘““w
`
`
`
`13““
`
`‘2‘.“‘I‘II‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 9 Leakage between Gale Poly Combs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1E-2
`
`
`0
`
`
`
`0.3
`
`
`
`Trench
`
`0.6
`
`
`vs (V)
`
`
`0.9
`
`
`1.2
`
`
`
`1.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 7 Parasitic PNP Bipolar Gain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 13 Gate Oxide Breakdown (Perim. = 78 cm)
`
`
`
`
`-
`.e-12-10
`12.10.13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Log Current
`Log Current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 12 N+ Junction Leakage (Perim.= 40 cm)
`
`
`80
`
`
`
`
`Optlmlzed Proces
`
`
`
`
`
`ungfgtmelgd
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TEM micrograph showing planar and detect tree trench
`
`
`
`Stress(MPa)
`
`
`
`NitrideLiner
`
`
`
`NoNitride Liner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___-__.___—__.—_.__.__.____—.__
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Percent e.o
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.““““_““““
`
`m1-
`
`
`
`
`
`0309121
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vonage (Vi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0369121510
`
`Vonage (V)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nu.““-L‘“u
`
`—‘—‘_‘--‘1—_“‘
`
`4:.o
`
`
`
`
`Percent g
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8001000
`
`
`200
`
`
`
`400
`000
`
`
`Temperature (“0)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 11 ln-situ Stress vs. Temp
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket