throbber
I86
`
`IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, VOL. 9, NO. 4, APRIL 1988
`
`Deep-Submicrometer MOS Device Fabrication
`Using a Photoresist-Ashing Technique
`
`Abstract-A photoresist-ashing process has been developed which,
`when used in conjunction with conventional g-line optical lithography,
`permits the controlled definition of deep-submicrometer features. The
`ultra-fine lines were obtained by calibrated ashing of the lithographically
`defined features in oxygen plasma. The technique has been successfully
`employed to fabricate MOSFET’s with effective channel length as small
`as 0.15 pm that show excellent characteristics. An NMOS ring oscillator
`with 0.2-pm devices has been fabricated with a room-temperature
`propagation delay of 22 pslstage which is believed to be the fastest value
`obtained for a MOS technology. Studies indicate that the thinning is both
`reproducible and uniform so that it should be usable in circuit as well as
`device fabrication. Since most polymer-based resist materials are etchable
`with an oxygen plasma, the basic technique could be extended to
`supplement other lithographic processes, including e-beam and X-ray
`processes, for fabricating both silicon and nonsilicon devices and circuits.
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`ECAUSE of the resolution limit of optical lithography,
`
`B e-beam and X-ray lithography have been the principal
`
`means used to fabricate deep-submicrometer devices including
`MOSFET’s [ 11-[3]. However, both techniques are compli-
`cated and expensive. In addition, both techniques require
`exposing the device to varying doses of high-energy radiation
`creating potential reliability problems.
`In this paper, a photoresist-ashing process is presented
`which, when used in conjunction with conventional g-line (A
`= 436 nm) optical lithography, permits the controlled
`definition of deep-submicrometer features. The technique has
`been successfully employed to fabricate MOSFET’s with
`effective channel length as small as 0.15 pm that show
`excellent overall characteristics. Results of evaluation studies
`indicate that the ashing is both reproducible and uniform so
`that it should be usable in circuit as well as device fabrication.
`
`11. FABRICATION
`PROCESS
`Polysilicon-gate NMOS transistors were fabricated as a
`demonstration of this technique. The starting substrates were
`4-in-diameter, 15-30 Q mcm, p-type silicon wafers. Each wafer
`was given a boron field implant of 2.25 x 10I2 cm-2 at 70
`
`Manuscript received November 19, 1987; revised February 5, 1988. This
`work was supported by SRC, Kodak Fellowship, Hughes, and Rockwell
`International under the State of California MICRO program, and the Joint
`Services Electronics Program (JSEP) under Contract F49620-84-C-0057,
`J. Chung, M.-C. Jeng, J. E. Moon, P. K. KO, and C. Hu are with the
`Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Electronics
`Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
`A. T. Wu and T. Y. Chan were with the Department of Electrical
`Engineering and Computer Sciences, Electronics Research Laboratory,
`University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. They are now with Intel
`Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 9505 1.
`IEEE Log Number 8820492.
`
`keV. The active regions were then defined using local
`oxidation of silicon (LOCOS). A field oxide of 0.25 pm was
`grown in steam at 950°C. Depending upon the gate oxide
`thickness, a boron threshold/punchthrough implant at 30 keV
`with varying dose from 1.0 x 10l2 to 1.6 x 1013 cm-2 was
`performed. Gate oxides of 3.6,5.6, 7.5, and 8.6 nm were then
`grown at 800°C in dry oxygen. Gate oxide of 15.6 nm was
`grown at 900°C in dry oxygen. All gate oxides were annealed
`in nitrogen at their oxidation temperature for 20 min. In-situ
`doped n+ -polysilicon (0.25 pm) was then immediately depos-
`ited by LPCVD. Up to this point, the process was similar to a
`standard NMOS process.
`Gates with drawn lengths from 0.7 to 1.5 pm were initially
`defined using conventional lithographic methods. Kodak
`Micro Positive Resist 820, a positive photoresist, was spun on
`to a thickness of 1.0 pm and soft-baked for 1 min at 100°C.
`All exposures were performed using a g-line lox wafer
`stepper. In order to obtain optimal after-ashing line shape and
`step coverage for the submicrometer gates, it was necessary to
`reduce the exposure 10-20 percent from the exposure required
`for defining gates longer than 1 pm. After exposure, the
`wafers were developed and given a final hard bake of 15 min
`at 120 ’ C before ashing .
`A low-frequency (30 kHz) plasma etching system was then
`used to ash the patterned photoresist. Optimal controllability
`and uniformity of the ashing process was observed for an
`oxygen pressure of 300 mtorr and an RF power of 50 W. To
`define the gates, the polysilicon was then anisotropically
`etched in C C 4 plasma.
`Self-aligned arsenic source/drain implants of 3.0 x
`cm-2 at 50 keV were then performed. Subsequent thermal
`cycles were less than 60 min at 900°C in order to reduce
`implant diffusion and the junction depth.
`
`111. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
`The ashing process was observed to be controllable and
`reproducible. Fig. 1 displays a plot of the SEM-measured gate
`length versus ashing time for four different drawn MOSFET
`gate lengths. A lateral ashing rate of about 0.068 pm/min is
`observed. This rate appears to be relatively independent of the
`ashing time, the initial drawn length, and the original
`photoresist shape. The linear ash rate appears constant down
`to at least 0.2 pm. Narrower lines can be created, but only
`with a lesser degree of control. The difference between the
`drawn lengths and the measured lengths before ashing is due to
`the reduced exposure mentioned above. The polysilicon gate
`width was also determined from the changing resistances of
`
`0741-3106/88/0400-0186$01 .OO O 1988 IEEE
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2029
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01246
`
`

`

`CHUNG et al.: DEEP-SUBMICROMETER MOS DEVICE FABRICATION
`
`1x7
`
`1.5
`
`r.
`
`U
`
`9 1
`5
`4 a
`5
`$ .5 s
`E
`2
`
`1 N-Channel XlU5FET
`To, = 36 8
`
`2.5
`
`0 &ask = 1.0 urn
`
`v,,=2v
`
`/
`
`1.5 v
`
`t v
`
`0.5 v
`
`/
`
`0
`
`2
`
`0
`6
`4
`Ashing Time I min 3
`Fig. 1. SEM measured channel length versus ashing time for four different
`initial mask channel lengths. The net lateral ashing rate is approximately
`680 Almin.
`
`10
`
`12
`
`0.0
`
`0.6
`
`1.8
`1.2
`Drain Vollage I V J
`Characteristic of a deep-submicrometer MOSFET fabricated with
`the photoresist-thinning technique.
`
`2.4
`
`3.0
`
`Fig. 4.
`
`Fig. 2. SEM photograph of the step coverage of a photoresist-covered
`polysilicon gate after 8 min of ashing. The polysilicon line is 0.5 p n wide.
`The profile of the photoresist is preserved after ashing.
`
`Fig. 5. Waveform of a 101-stage enhancementldepletion ring oscillator
`consisting of 0.2-pm MOSFET’s with 75-nm gate oxide at a power supply
`voltage of 3 V. The output signal is 75 mV peak to peak (20 mVldiv).
`
`approximately 0.5 pm. The estimated junction depth is 0.2
`pm. The difference between the measured junction depth and
`the lateral diffusion distance under the gate edge reflects a
`nonequality between the vertical and lateral arsenic diffusion
`rates. From C- I/ profiling measurements and computer
`simulations, the channel doping was estimated to be 2-8 x
`depending upon the threshold/punchthrough im-
`10’’
`plant.
`No process controllability problems were introduced by the
`ashing procedure. Using data obtained from the capacitance
`technique [4], the effective channel length Leff was compared
`with the drawn gate length Lmask. The amount of length
`reduction (AL = Lmask - Leff) was found to be independent of
`Lm&. Statistical measurements were performed on wafer lots
`with varying amounts of ashing time. No significant variability
`in channel length was introduced by the ashing process within
`a particular lot. Any channel length variations observed were
`found to be within the tolerances of the lithographic system
`used.
`Fig. 4 shows the characteristics for a transistor with an
`oxide thickness of 3.6 nm and an effective channel length of
`0.15 pm. The measured transconductance of this device is
`over 630 mS/mm at room temperature. Excellent performance
`and punchthrough control are observed, and no gate-diffusion
`nonoverlap problems were found [ 5 ] .
`Fig. 5 displays the waveform of a 101-stage enhancement/
`
`Fig. 3. SEM photograph of a transistor cross section with Leff = 0.22 pm.
`The junction depth is 0.2 pm. Ashing time is 8 min, and AL due to the
`ashing is approximately 0.5 pm.
`
`polysilicon resistors with varying amounts of ashing time.
`Good agreement between electrical and SEM results was
`observed. Fig. 2 presents an SEM picture of a photoresist-
`covered polysilicon line after 8 min of ashing. Excellent line
`shape and step coverage is observed. No change in the
`photoresist profile was observed during the ashing procedure.
`This ashing procedure was incorporated into a deep-
`submicrometer process. Fig. 3 displays an SEM picture of
`transistor cross sections with an L,ff of 0.22 pm. The ashing
`time was 8 min with a corresponding length reduction of
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`I88
`
`IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, VOL. 9, NO. 4, APRIL 1988
`
`depletion ring oscillator with an L,ff of 0.2 pm and a 7.5-nm
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`gate Oxide. A room-temperature gate
`Of 22 Ps is
`The authors would like to thank K. Voros, R. Hamilton, R.
`at a power
`is Rudell, M. Kushner, and T. Booth from the Micro-Electronics
`Observed
`Of
`believed to be the fastest value reported for a silicon MOS Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, for their
`technology.
`assistance in the device fabrication process.
`
`”‘ This
`
`Iv . CONCLUSIONS
`A photoresist-ashing process has been developed which
`allows the relatively simple fabrication of deep-submicrometer
`MOSFET’s using only g-line lithography. This process
`appears to be controllable and easily adaptable to most existing
`technologies. Although this technique does not inherently
`improve circuit density, by increasing the gain and driving
`capability of the MOSFET, the potential of improving digital
`and analog circuit speed is significant. Since most polymer-
`based resist materials are ashable with an oxygen plasma, the
`basic technique could be extendible to supplement other
`lithographic processes, including e-beam and X-ray processes,
`for fabricating both silicon and nonsilicon devices and circuits.
`
`[2]
`
`[3]
`
`REFERENCES
`[l] W. Fichtner et al., “High-speed low-power circuits fabricated using a
`submicron NMOS technology,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol.
`EDL-6, p. 662, 1985.
`W. Fichtner et al., “0.15 pm channel-length MOSFETs fabricated
`using E-beam lithography,” in IEDM Tech. Dig., 1982, p. 722.
`S. Y. Chou, H. I. Smith, and D. A. Antoniadis, “Sub-100 nm channel
`length transistors fabricated using X-ray lithography,” J. Vac. Sci.
`Tech. B, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 253, 1986.
`B. J. Sheu and P. K. KO, “A capacitance method to determine channel
`length for conventional and LDD MOSFET’s,” IEEE Electron Device
`Lett., vol. EDL-5, p. 491, 1984.
`P. K. KO, T. Y. Chan, A. T. Wu, and C. Hu, “The effects of weak
`gate-to-drain (source) overlap on MOSFET characteristics,” in IEDM
`Tech. Dig., 1986, p. 292.
`
`[4]
`
`[5]
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket