Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`Reporter's Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`June 07, 2017
`
`Voip-Pal Ex. 2052
`IPR2016-01198
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·3
`
`·4
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · ·APPLE INC.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · ·Petitioner
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·v.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · VOIP-PAL.COM, Inc.,
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · Patent Owner
`
`10
`
`11· · · · · · · · · · Case No. IPR2016-01198
`· · · · · · · · · · · ·U.S. Patent 9,179,005
`12
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · Case No. IPR2016-01201
`· · · · · · · · · · · ·U.S. Patent 8,542,815
`14
`
`15
`
`16· · · · · REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF TELEPHONIC HEARING
`
`17· · · · · · · · · · WEDNESDAY, JUNE 7, 2017
`
`18· · · · · · · · · · ·8:00 A.M. - 8:21 A.M.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22· ·Reported by:
`· · ·Annette Moore
`23· ·CSR No. 2648
`
`24· ·Job No. 10033665
`
`25
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`·1· ·APPEARING VIA TELEPHONE:
`
`·2· ·Patent Trial and Appeal Board:
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · JUDGE COX
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · JUDGE SCALA
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · JUDGE SHAGNON
`
`·6
`· · ·For the Petitioner:
`·7
`· · · · · · · · · · ERISE IP
`·8
`· · · · · · · · · · BY:· ADAM P. SEITZ, ESQ.
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · ·PAUL R. HART, ESQ.
`
`10· · · · · · · · · 6201 College Boulevard, Suite 300
`
`11· · · · · · · · · Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`
`12· · · · · · · · · (913) 777-5600
`
`13
`
`14· ·For the Patent Owner:
`
`15· · · · · · · · · KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`16· · · · · · · · · BY:· KERRY S. TAYLOR, ESQ.
`
`17· · · · · · · · · 2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`
`18· · · · · · · · · Irvine, California 92614
`
`19· · · · · · · · · (949) 760-0404
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 2
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· ·Hello, good morning.· This is
`
`·2· ·Judge Cox.· I'm joined on the call with Justice Scala and
`
`·3· ·Shagnon.· Who do we have on the call for the petitioner?
`
`·4· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· Adam Seitz.· Also with me is Paul
`
`·5· ·Hart.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· All right.· Thank you.· Who do we
`
`·7· ·have on the call for the patent owner?
`
`·8· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Kerry Taylor.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· It sounds like we have a court
`
`10· ·reporter, is that correct?
`
`11· · · · · · · · THE COURT REPORTER:· Yes.
`
`12· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Who arranged for the court
`
`13· ·reporter?
`
`14· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· The patent owner arranged for
`
`15· ·that.
`
`16· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Once we're done with this call,
`
`17· ·please file the transcript, once it's available, as an
`
`18· ·exhibit.
`
`19· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Sure.
`
`20· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· All right.· This is a conference
`
`21· ·call in connection with two proceedings, IPR2016-01198 and
`
`22· ·IPR2016-01201.
`
`23· · · ·(The court reporter lost connection on the call.)
`
`24· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Thank you.· Mr. Seitz, I want to
`
`25· ·hear from you.· Before you start, I wanted to ask:· Have
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 3
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·you taken the position that the Board, this panel would be
`
`·2· ·prohibited from allowing a sur-reply?
`
`·3· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· No, Your Honor, we have not taken
`
`·4· ·that position.· Our position is just that the Board
`
`·5· ·certainly has the power to grant the sur-reply.· When you
`
`·6· ·look at the cases that are out there, the decisions that
`
`·7· ·are out there, nobody needs sur-replies.· We believe that
`
`·8· ·there's something very clear that's apparent there, and
`
`·9· ·that is that a sur-reply is not a matter of right even
`
`10· ·when a patent owner raises an antedating prior art issue.
`
`11· · · · · · · · If you look at the cases cited by the
`
`12· ·parties, we believe that supports that, your Honor.· For
`
`13· ·example, Belden, which Mr. Taylor was just discussing,
`
`14· ·clearly does not support the idea to an automatic
`
`15· ·sur-reply.· They also cited the Cox case.· That was
`
`16· ·unopposed because there was a new declaration, new
`
`17· ·evidence that was submitted in the reply.
`
`18· · · · · · · · There are other cases that were cited in
`
`19· ·Mr. Taylor's email that walk through whether a sur-reply
`
`20· ·was granted or not.· When you look at those cases,
`
`21· ·there's, again, a very clear indication of something that
`
`22· ·was added in the reply.· If you look at, for example,
`
`23· ·Cencio, these were cited in Mr. Kerry Taylor's last email,
`
`24· ·there was a challenge to inventorship that was raised for
`
`25· ·the first time in their reply brief.· In the HTC case,
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 4
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·there were three new declarations submitted in the reply
`
`·2· ·brief.· In the LG case, there was new expert testimony in
`
`·3· ·the reply brief.· In the Snap-on case, there were twelve
`
`·4· ·new documents that were cited in the reply brief.
`
`·5· · · · · · · · So our position is that a sur-reply could
`
`·6· ·certainly be appropriate in those instances where new
`
`·7· ·evidence, new testimony, something new is submitted in the
`
`·8· ·reply.· Here, we simply don't have that.· Mr. Taylor talks
`
`·9· ·about new arguments, distortions of facts and law.· He
`
`10· ·still has not identified those.· And he kind of summarily
`
`11· ·skipped over the fact that there was new evidence that he
`
`12· ·talked about.
`
`13· · · · · · · · But let's be clear on what we submitted in
`
`14· ·our reply.· We submitted exhibits.· Those exhibits
`
`15· ·included deposition transcripts of patent owner's own
`
`16· ·declarants.· They had eight declarants in their responsive
`
`17· ·briefs.· We took depositions and we submitted those
`
`18· ·deposition transcripts as part of our reply brief.· We
`
`19· ·also submitted a copy of the complaint from the litigation
`
`20· ·in this case to show the amount of money that Voip-Pal is
`
`21· ·asking of that litigation and out of this case.· Then the
`
`22· ·final exhibit was emails from Mr. Taylor himself between
`
`23· ·the parties.
`
`24· · · · · · · · There simply was no new evidence that was
`
`25· ·submitted.· We didn't have a new expert.· We didn't submit
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 5
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·new declarations.· There's no new fact witnesses.· This
`
`·2· ·really comes down to the fact that patent owner wants a
`
`·3· ·final chance to provide attorney argument, which we just
`
`·4· ·heard from Mr. Taylor himself.· That is not proper here.
`
`·5· · · · · · · · So, your Honor, our position is that
`
`·6· ·sur-replies can be appropriate in certain circumstances,
`
`·7· ·but they should not be granted as a matter of right.· To
`
`·8· ·do that would encourage a patent owner in antedating cases
`
`·9· ·to hide or conceal or be less than clear with their
`
`10· ·theories in their response, and then provide all of that
`
`11· ·evidence in a sur-reply, at which point the petitioner
`
`12· ·would be precluded from challenging or addressing those
`
`13· ·theories during the discovery period with the expert
`
`14· ·declarants and without an opportunity to fully test those.
`
`15· · · · · · · · We don't believe this is a situation, because
`
`16· ·there's no new evidence that was submitted, that would
`
`17· ·warrant a sur-reply.
`
`18· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Thank you.· Mr. Taylor, I want to
`
`19· ·hear from you one last time before I confer with my
`
`20· ·colleagues.· What issues specifically are you seeking to
`
`21· ·respond to?· And is this something that -- this issue,
`
`22· ·have you not had opportunity, for instance, in the patent
`
`23· ·owner response to address it?· So two questions.
`
`24· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Sure.· So there are multiple
`
`25· ·issues that patent owner wishes to respond to.· One is the
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 6
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·legal standard for the requirement for testing that
`
`·2· ·petitioner laid out in the reply.· Patent owner doesn't
`
`·3· ·believe that that standard is appropriately presented or
`
`·4· ·is the correct standard.· Also, there are factual
`
`·5· ·characterizations of the alleged lack of evidence for
`
`·6· ·confirming and testing the software that was submitted in
`
`·7· ·Exhibit 2014 to verify that the software worked for its
`
`·8· ·intended purpose.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · There's also argument by patent owner
`
`10· ·regarding the software not practicing all elements of the
`
`11· ·claim that goes into petitioner proposing improper claim
`
`12· ·construction that's inconsistent with the patent itself
`
`13· ·and the testimony on this issue.
`
`14· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· This claim construction that
`
`15· ·you're talking about, that appears in the reply for the
`
`16· ·first time?· Do I understand that correctly?
`
`17· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· It's an implicit argument
`
`18· ·because the petitioner is making an argument that a
`
`19· ·particular rallying method is not practiced and they are
`
`20· ·likening that to the claim language as not being -- as
`
`21· ·therefore not being met.· There's no express construction
`
`22· ·going on.· There's a necessary aspect of construing that
`
`23· ·element very narrowly in order to meet the petitioner's
`
`24· ·argument.
`
`25· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Okay.· Mr. Seitz, any last words
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 7
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·before I confer with my colleague?
`
`·2· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· Yes, your Honor, very briefly.
`
`·3· ·Nothing that I just heard seems to warrant a sur-reply.
`
`·4· ·Those are all arguments that patent owner is certainly
`
`·5· ·welcome to raise during the final hearing on this issue.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · No new claim construction was provided.· Any
`
`·7· ·claim construction issue that he's talking about,
`
`·8· ·everything that he's talking about, should have been
`
`·9· ·raised in their response.
`
`10· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Okay.· Thank you.· I understand
`
`11· ·both sides.· Please remain on the call.· I'm going to
`
`12· ·confer with my colleagues.· Please stay on.· Thank you.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · (The proceedings went off the record.)
`
`14· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Hello, this is Judge Cox again.
`
`15· ·Do I still have -- Mr. Seitz, are you still on the call?
`
`16· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· Yes, your Honor.
`
`17· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· And, Mr. Taylor, are you still on
`
`18· ·the call?
`
`19· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Yes, your Honor.
`
`20· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· I believe as we were going off,
`
`21· ·do I understand that the court reporter, that you missed
`
`22· ·part of the beginning of the call?
`
`23· · · · · · · · THE COURT REPORTER:· Yes, I was disconnected
`
`24· ·and lost the whole first speaking of Mr. Taylor.
`
`25· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Okay.· Well, so, just for
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 8
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·posterity, Mr. Taylor, why don't you just summarize what
`
`·2· ·you had requested at the beginning of the call so we have
`
`·3· ·a record of it.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Sure.· So patent owner is
`
`·5· ·requesting a five page sur-reply to reply to various
`
`·6· ·arguments in petitioner's reply on fact and law that
`
`·7· ·patent owner could not have foreseen with patent owner's
`
`·8· ·response.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · Patent owner does not believe this is an
`
`10· ·unusual request.· The Board has often authorized patent
`
`11· ·owners, who are antedating a reference, to file a
`
`12· ·sur-reply, as indicated in the initial email that patent
`
`13· ·owner sent to the Board on May 29th.· Patent owner
`
`14· ·disagrees with petitioner's characterization of Federal
`
`15· ·Circuit's holding in Belden v. Bortech, that the Federal
`
`16· ·Circuit did provide broad discretion to the Board to
`
`17· ·permit sur-replies.
`
`18· · · · · · · · And even if the petitioner's higher
`
`19· ·requirement for evidence to be submitted with the reply of
`
`20· ·a threshold were to be the case, petitioner did submit new
`
`21· ·evidence in these proceedings.· Even under petitioner's
`
`22· ·position, it would be appropriate to file a sur-reply in
`
`23· ·these proceedings.
`
`24· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Okay.· Thank you.· Mr. Seitz, I
`
`25· ·don't want to hear again from you.· I just want to make
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 9
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·sure that -- was that -- in your view, that was all
`
`·2· ·accurate?
`
`·3· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· Yes, your Honor, I have no
`
`·4· ·problems with what Mr. Taylor just said.· I heard his
`
`·5· ·argument.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Thank you.· I have one question
`
`·7· ·and I don't know if I saw this in your email.· Do you
`
`·8· ·agree that when it comes to the antedating issue that the
`
`·9· ·patent owner has the burden of production in this case?
`
`10· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Yes.
`
`11· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· ·You do.· Okay.· We heard from
`
`12· ·both sides.· At this point I don't think we have enough --
`
`13· ·there's enough time in this proceeding to hear from the
`
`14· ·patent owner.· Five pages does not seem unreasonable.
`
`15· · · · · · · · Mr. Seitz, I understand your objection and
`
`16· ·right now we are not going to authorize a sur-sur-reply.
`
`17· ·If we decide that we need one, we will potentially contact
`
`18· ·you and authorize one.· But right now we are going to
`
`19· ·authorize a sur-reply from the patent owner limited to
`
`20· ·five pages.
`
`21· · · · · · · · Mr. Taylor, how much time do you need to file
`
`22· ·that sur-reply?
`
`23· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Patent owner would like to file
`
`24· ·that on due date five, if that's possible.
`
`25· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· I was thinking, since it's
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 10
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`·1· ·limited to five pages, we'd like to have it in the record
`
`·2· ·before that.
`
`·3· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Okay.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· The hearings in these cases are
`
`·5· ·scheduled for -- potentially scheduled for July 20th.· Do
`
`·6· ·I have that correct?
`
`·7· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· That's correct, your Honor.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· Correct.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Could you have it filed in a week
`
`10· ·from today?
`
`11· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Yes, yes, your Honor.
`
`12· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Today is June 7th.· That would be
`
`13· ·by June 14th,· a five-page sur-reply.· We will authorize
`
`14· ·that.· I will send out the order indicating that the
`
`15· ·authorization has been provided.
`
`16· · · · · · · · Anything else from the parties?· Mr. Seitz?
`
`17· · · · · · · · MR. SEITZ:· No, your Honor.
`
`18· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Mr. Taylor?
`
`19· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Nothing further, your Honor.
`
`20· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· Again, please file the transcript
`
`21· ·of this call when it becomes available.
`
`22· · · · · · · · MR. TAYLOR:· Yes, your Honor.
`
`23· · · · · · · · THE COURT:· With that, if there's nothing
`
`24· ·else, the panel has nothing further, so this call is
`
`25· ·adjourned.
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·MR. SEITZ:· Thank you.
`
`·2· · · · ·MR. TAYLOR:· Thank you, your Honor.
`
`·3· ·(The proceeding were concluded at 8:21 a.m.)
`
`·4
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 12
`
`

`

`·1· ·STATE OF CALIFORNIA· )
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · ) SS
`
`·3· ·COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO· )
`
`·4
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8· · · · · · · I, ANNETTE MOORE, Certified Shorthand Reporter,
`
`·9· ·DO HEREBY CERTIFY:
`
`10· · · · · · · That I was present at the time of the
`
`11· ·proceedings in the case as entitled on the title page
`
`12· ·thereof; that I took down in shorthand all of the
`
`13· ·testimony given and proceedings had; and I further certify
`
`14· ·that the foregoing and annexed pages comprise a full, true
`
`15· ·and correct transcript of my said shorthand notes.
`
`16· · · · · · ·DATED: June 12, 2017, at San Diego, California.
`
`17
`
`18· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
`
`19· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·ANNETTE MOORE, C.S.R. 2648
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Page 13
`
`

`

`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`1
`
`14th 11:13
`
`2014 7:7
`
`20th 11:5
`
`29th 9:13
`
`7th 11:12
`
`2
`
`7
`
`A
`
`accurate 10:2
`
`Adam 3:4
`
`added 4:22
`
`address 6:23
`
`attorney 6:3
`
`authorization 11:15
`
`authorize 10:16,18,
` 19 11:13
`
`claim 7:11,14,20 8:6,
` 7
`
`clear 4:8,21 5:13 6:9
`
`colleague 8:1
`
`authorized 9:10
`
`colleagues 6:20 8:12
`
`automatic 4:14
`
`complaint 5:19
`
`B
`
`conceal 6:9
`
`confer 6:19 8:1,12
`
`beginning 8:22 9:2
`
`conference 3:20
`
`Belden 4:13 9:15
`
`confirming 7:6
`
`Board 4:1,4 9:10,13,
` 16
`
`Bortech 9:15
`
`briefly 8:2
`
`briefs 5:17
`
`broad 9:16
`
`burden 10:9
`
`C
`
`connection 3:21,23
`
`construction 7:12,14,
` 21 8:6,7
`
`construing 7:22
`
`contact 10:17
`
`copy 5:19
`
`correct 3:10 7:4 11:6,
` 7,8
`
`disconnected 8:23
`
`discovery 6:13
`
`discretion 9:16
`
`discussing 4:13
`
`distortions 5:9
`
`documents 5:4
`
`due 10:24
`
`E
`
`element 7:23
`
`elements 7:10
`
`email 4:19,23 9:12
` 10:7
`
`emails 5:22
`
`encourage 6:8
`
`evidence 4:17 5:7,11,
` 24 6:11,16 7:5 9:19,
` 21
`
`addressing 6:12
`
`adjourned 11:25
`
`agree 10:8
`
`alleged 7:5
`
`allowing 4:2
`
`amount 5:20
`
`antedating 4:10 6:8
` 9:11 10:8
`
`apparent 4:8
`
`appears 7:15
`
`appropriately 7:3
`
`argument 6:3 7:9,17,
` 18,24 10:5
`
`arguments 5:9 8:4
` 9:6
`
`call 3:2,3,7,16,21,23
` 8:11,15,18,22 9:2
` 11:21,24
`
`case 4:15,25 5:2,3,
` 20,21 9:20 10:9
`
`cases 4:6,11,18,20
` 6:8 11:4
`
`Cencio 4:23
`
`challenge 4:24
`
`challenging 6:12
`
`chance 6:3
`
`characterization 9:14
`
`characterizations 7:5
`
`Circuit 9:16
`
`arranged 3:12,14
`
`Circuit's 9:15
`
`art 4:10
`
`aspect 7:22
`
`circumstances 6:6
`
`cited 4:11,15,18,23
` 5:4
`
`correctly 7:16
`
`exhibit 3:18 5:22 7:7
`
`court 3:1,6,9,11,12,
` 16,20,23,24 6:18
` 7:14,25 8:10,14,17,
` 20,21,23,25 9:24
` 10:6,11,25 11:4,9,12,
` 18,20,23
`
`Cox 3:2 4:15 8:14
`
`D
`
`date 10:24
`
`decide 10:17
`
`decisions 4:6
`
`declarants 5:16 6:14
`
`declaration 4:16
`
`declarations 5:1 6:1
`
`deposition 5:15,18
`
`depositions 5:17
`
`disagrees 9:14
`
`exhibits 5:14
`
`expert 5:2,25 6:13
`
`express 7:21
`
`F
`
`fact 5:11 6:1,2 9:6
`
`facts 5:9
`
`factual 7:4
`
`Federal 9:14,15
`
`file 3:17 9:11,22
` 10:21,23 11:20
`
`filed 11:9
`
`final 5:22 6:3 8:5
`
`five-page 11:13
`
`foreseen 9:7
`
`fully 6:14
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`·Index: 14th–fully
`
`

`

`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`IPR2016-01198 3:21
`
`method 7:19
`
`point 6:11 10:12
`
`G
`
`good 3:1
`
`grant 4:5
`
`granted 4:20 6:7
`
`H
`
`Hart 3:5
`
`hear 3:25 6:19 9:25
` 10:13
`
`IPR2016-01201 3:22
`
`missed 8:21
`
`issue 4:10 6:21 7:13
` 8:5,7 10:8
`
`issues 6:20,25
`
`J
`
`joined 3:2
`
`Judge 3:2 8:14
`
`July 11:5
`
`money 5:20
`
`morning 3:1
`
`multiple 6:24
`
`N
`
`narrowly 7:23
`
`O
`
`position 4:1,4 5:5 6:5
` 9:22
`
`posterity 9:1
`
`potentially 10:17
` 11:5
`
`power 4:5
`
`practiced 7:19
`
`practicing 7:10
`
`precluded 6:12
`
`presented 7:3
`
`prior 4:10
`
`problems 10:4
`
`proceeding 10:13
`
`proceedings 3:21
` 8:13 9:21,23
`
`production 10:9
`
`heard 6:4 8:3 10:4,11
`
`June 11:12,13
`
`hearing 8:5
`
`hearings 11:4
`
`hide 6:9
`
`higher 9:18
`
`holding 9:15
`
`Justice 3:2
`
`K
`
`Kerry 3:8 4:23
`
`kind 5:10
`
`L
`
`objection 10:15
`
`opportunity 6:14,22
`
`order 7:23 11:14
`
`owner 3:7,14 4:10
` 6:2,8,23,25 7:2,9 8:4
` 9:4,7,9,13 10:9,14,
` 19,23
`
`owner's 5:15 9:7
`
`prohibited 4:2
`
`owners 9:11
`
`proper 6:4
`
`Honor 4:3,12 6:5 8:2,
` 16,19 10:3 11:7,11,
` 17,19,22
`
`HTC 4:25
`
`lack 7:5
`
`laid 7:2
`
`I
`
`language 7:20
`
`idea 4:14
`
`identified 5:10
`
`implicit 7:17
`
`improper 7:11
`
`included 5:15
`
`inconsistent 7:12
`
`indicating 11:14
`
`indication 4:21
`
`initial 9:12
`
`instance 6:22
`
`instances 5:6
`
`intended 7:8
`
`inventorship 4:24
`
`law 5:9 9:6
`
`legal 7:1
`
`LG 5:2
`
`likening 7:20
`
`limited 10:19 11:1
`
`litigation 5:19,21
`
`lost 3:23 8:24
`
`M
`
`make 9:25
`
`making 7:18
`
`matter 4:9 6:7
`
`meet 7:23
`
`met 7:21
`
`P
`
`proposing 7:11
`
`provide 6:3,10 9:16
`
`pages 10:14,20 11:1
`
`provided 8:6 11:15
`
`panel 4:1 11:24
`
`purpose 7:8
`
`part 5:18 8:22
`
`parties 4:12 5:23
` 11:16
`
`patent 3:7,14 4:10
` 5:15 6:2,8,22,25 7:2,
` 9,12 8:4 9:4,7,9,10,
` 12,13 10:9,14,19,23
`
`Paul 3:4
`
`period 6:13
`
`permit 9:17
`
`petitioner 3:3 6:11
` 7:2,11,18 9:20
`
`petitioner's 7:23 9:6,
` 14,18,21
`
`Q
`
`question 10:6
`
`questions 6:23
`
`R
`
`raise 8:5
`
`raised 4:24 8:9
`
`raises 4:10
`
`rallying 7:19
`
`record 8:13 9:3 11:1
`
`reference 9:11
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`·Index: good–reference
`
`

`

`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`Transcript of Telephonic Hearing
`
`Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`remain 8:11
`
`stay 8:12
`
`twelve 5:3
`
`U
`
`understand 7:16
` 8:10,21 10:15
`
`unopposed 4:16
`
`unreasonable 10:14
`
`unusual 9:10
`
`V
`
`verify 7:7
`
`view 10:1
`
`Voip-pal 5:20
`
`W
`
`walk 4:19
`
`wanted 3:25
`
`warrant 6:17 8:3
`
`week 11:9
`
`wishes 6:25
`
`witnesses 6:1
`
`words 7:25
`
`worked 7:7
`
`reply 4:17,22,25 5:1,
` 3,4,8,14,18 7:2,15
` 9:5,6,19
`
`reporter 3:10,11,13,
` 23 8:21,23
`
`request 9:10
`
`requested 9:2
`
`requesting 9:5
`
`requirement 7:1 9:19
`
`respond 6:21,25
`
`response 6:10,23 8:9
` 9:8
`
`responsive 5:16
`
`S
`
`Scala 3:2
`
`scheduled 11:5
`
`seeking 6:20
`
`Seitz 3:4,24 4:3 7:25
` 8:2,15,16 9:24 10:3,
` 15 11:8,16,17
`
`send 11:14
`
`Shagnon 3:3
`
`show 5:20
`
`sides 8:11 10:12
`
`simply 5:8,24
`
`situation 6:15
`
`skipped 5:11
`
`Snap-on 5:3
`
`software 7:6,7,10
`
`sounds 3:9
`
`speaking 8:24
`
`specifically 6:20
`
`standard 7:1,3,4
`
`start 3:25
`
`submit 5:25 9:20
`
`submitted 4:17 5:1,7,
` 13,14,17,19,25 6:16
` 7:6 9:19
`
`summarily 5:10
`
`summarize 9:1
`
`support 4:14
`
`supports 4:12
`
`sur-replies 4:7 6:6
` 9:17
`
`sur-reply 4:2,5,9,15,
` 19 5:5 6:11,17 8:3
` 9:5,12,22 10:19,22
` 11:13
`
`sur-sur-reply 10:16
`
`T
`
`talked 5:12
`
`talking 7:15 8:7,8
`
`talks 5:8
`
`Taylor 3:8,14,19 4:13
` 5:8,22 6:4,18,24 7:17
` 8:17,19,24 9:1,4
` 10:4,10,21,23 11:3,7,
` 11,18,19,22
`
`Taylor's 4:19,23
`
`test 6:14
`
`testimony 5:2,7 7:13
`
`testing 7:1,6
`
`theories 6:10,13
`
`thinking 10:25
`
`threshold 9:20
`
`time 4:25 6:19 7:16
` 10:13,21
`
`today 11:10,12
`
`transcript 3:17 11:20
`
`transcripts 5:15,18
`
`www.aptusCR.com
`
`·Index: remain–worked
`
`