throbber
(12) Ulllted States Patent
`Soussan et al.
`
`(10) Patent N0.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`US006526357B1
`
`(54) ASSOCIATED PARAMETER MEASURING
`AND/OR MONITORING SUCH AS IN THE
`EVALUATION OF PRESSURE DIFFERENCES
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Daniel A. Soussan, Lakewood, CO
`(US); Douglas P. Miller, Lakewood,
`co (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Gambro, Inc., Lakewood, CO (US)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 105 days.
`
`(21) Appl. N0.: 09/631,204
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Aug‘ 1’ 2000
`
`(60)
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`Provisional application No. 60/147,958, filed on Aug. 9,
`1999.
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.7 .............................................. .. G06F 19/00
`U.S. Cl.
`........................................ ..
`(58) Field Of Search ......................... .. 604/65; 364/509;
`702/45; 73/304; 222/15
`
`(56)
`
`References Clted
`Us. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2
`9
`’
`4,161,880 A
`4,168,517 A
`4,227,420 A
`4,315,309 A
`4,370,983 A
`4,403,296 A
`4,600,401 A
`4,661,246 A
`4>710>164 A
`4>718>891 A
`4’739’492 A
`4,828,543 A
`4,879,040 A
`4,954,128 A
`
`7/1979 Prosky
`9/1979 Lee
`10/1980 Lamadrid
`2/1982 C011
`2/1983 Lichtenstein
`9/1983 Pmsky
`7/1986 Kamen
`4/1987 Ash
`12/1987 L°Vin 6‘ a1~
`1/1988 Lipps
`4/1988 Cochran
`5/1989 Weiss et al.
`11/1989 Prince et al.
`9/1990 Ford
`
`5,069,792 A
`5,174,894 A
`5200990 A
`5,211,849 A
`
`12/1991 Prince et al.
`12/1992 Ohsawa et a1.
`4/1993 Fwd 6% a1~
`5/1993 Kitaevich et al.
`
`8/1993 Duff
`5234508 A
`(List Continued on next page.)
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`EP
`
`EP
`
`EP
`EP
`EP
`
`0967554 A1
`
`12/1999
`
`0990417 A1
`
`4/2000
`
`0993803 A1
`0997102 A1
`0997103 A1
`
`4/2000
`5/2000
`5/2000
`
`Primary Examiner—John S. Hilten
`Assistant Examiner—Xiuqin Sun
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Peter H. Scull; Edna M.
`O’Connor; Laura M. Butterfield
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`Closer
`Correction quantities are generated for
`approximations of actual parameters. These are Obtained by
`preliminarily subjecting parametric transducers to pre-
`selected parametric values and recording the measured val-
`ues for each transducer in a data table for later use as or in
`colrrection q1$antitiets)iAn elmbodilment inclufles interpolatifin
`re ative to
`ata ta
`e Va ues c osest
`to t e operationa y
`measured parametric value and using the resulting interpo-
`lated value as a corrected parametric value. Such interpola-
`.
`.
`tions may be performed for two parametric transducers
`relative to two substances. The resulting corrected paramet-
`ric values may then be subtracted to.obtain a parametric
`difference. Afurther embodiment may include using correc-
`tion quantities of a reference parametric transducer in inter-
`polation calculations for the actual parametric transducers.
`Similarly, other data table correction recordations such as
`differences between two measured parameters can be used to
`modify an operationally measured parametric differential.
`Reference transducer corrections can be used here as well
`'
`
`22 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`000001
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000001
`
`

`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,263,924 A
`53779188 A
`5,326,476 A
`5’344’568 A
`5,370,123 A
`5372709 A
`5,431,811 A
`5,441,636 A
`5,473,537 A
`5,482,049 A
`5,487,827 A
`5,497,665 A
`5,510,716 A
`5,510,717 A
`5,536,237 A
`5,551,440 A
`
`11/1993 Mathewson
`1/1994 5°11“
`7/1994 Grogan et al.
`9/1994 Kitaevich et a1’
`12/1994 Shinzato
`12/1994 H°°d
`7/1995 Tusinietal.
`8/1995 Chevalletetal.
`12/1995 Glazeretal.
`1/1996 Addissetal.
`1/1996 Peterson etal.
`3/1996 Cage etal.
`4/1996 Buffaloe, IV et al.
`4/1996 Buflaloejlv etal.
`7/1996 Prince et 211.
`9/1996 Miyawaki
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`Page 2
`
`1.
`
`‘
`
`364 509
`/
`
`4/1997 Rosa et al.
`5,618,441 A
`1
`7/1997 N’ h’
`1
`5,645,642 A
`7/1997 B::g1gZ:r0ef/as
`5650 071 A
`11/1997 Kenley et 211
`5,690,831 A
`.
`’
`’
`Efaflkro oulos et 211
`A
`1/1998 F ldp pt
`1
`5’711’883 A
`3/1998 K0 len eta].
`5,725,776 A
`53745377 A * 41998 P“ 0":
`57499364 A
`41998 siiwerf fig '1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
`57769091 A
`71998 B“’‘’‘‘’ "te
`57889851 A
`E51998 Kmfgerf
`59109252 A
`6/1999 T°’¥tfyt°1“‘
`63045510 A
`42000 0"“ etai
`9
`9
`/
`.g‘.“ 6 a"
`6,280,408 B1
`8/2001 Slpln ......................... .. 604/65
`
`*
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`000002
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000002
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 1 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`00
`VB
`
`FigureI
`
`000003
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000003
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 2 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`Figure 2
`
`000004
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000004
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`Figure 3
`
`000005
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000005
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`QQ*~\
`
`100
`
`E
`5
`:
`:
`
`98
`
`5
`
`E
`E
`
`:
`
`93a
`
`E
`92a
`E On
`PRESSURE ' A”lb
`E V
`925
`.501)
`PRESSURE ' ‘ 1
`TRANSDUCER
`I
`825
`
`
`
`
`DRY GAS
`PUMP
`
`97
`
`E
`5
`E
`5
`E
`5
`'------------------1:
`96
`E
`5
`:
`5
`
`DR
`GA
`SOURCE
`
`E 9
`;—80C
`92¢
`PRESSURE ' X
`TRANSDUCER
`: _ 826
`5 v
`9”
`Eisod
`93d
`PRESSURE
`I
`1
`TRANSDUCER 1';
`82d
`E V
`:
`:
`
`A
`
`000005
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000006
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 5 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`J10
`
`PRELIMINARY TO
`A CTUAL USE
`
`
`
`PRESS URIZE APPARA TUS TUBING
`SYSTEM TO ONE OF PLURALITY OF <-j
`PRE-SELECTED PRESSURE VALUES
`
`112
`
`I15
`
`MEASURE AND RECORD IN A
`DATA TABLE CORRESPONDING
`TRANSDUCER PRESSURE VALUES
`
`
`
`J14
`
` PRESS URIZE
`ALL PRE-SELECTED
`
`VALUES .7
` I20
`
`
`
`
`11.7
`
`I22
`
`
`
`PROCEED TO
`ACTUAL USE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SELECT FROM DATA TABLE THE
`NEAREST TABLE VALUES FOR
`EACH MEASURED VALUE
`
`
`
`I24
`
`MEASURE OPERA TIONAL
`TRANSDUCER PRESSURE VALUES
`
`
`
`CONVERSION TO
`
`/LCORRECTED PRESSURE VALUES 1
`
`125
`
`
`
`CALCULA TE IMP
`
`
` I30
`
`
`
`126
`
`.728
`
`OPERA TION
`COMPLETE
`
`YES
`
`END
`
`Figure 7
`
`000007
`
`Nipro EX. ‘I011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000007
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`PRELIMINARY TO
`ACTUAL USE
`
`110
`
`
`
`PRESS URIZE APPARA TUS TUBING
`SYSTEM TO ONE OF PLURALITY OF
`PRE—SELECTED PRESSURE VALUES
`
`112
`
`H 7
`
`MEASURE CORRESPONDING
`TRANSDUCER PRESSURE VALUES
`
`
`
`
`RECORD CORRECTIONS IN DA TA TABLE
`
`I I 9
`
`120
`
`
`
` PRESS URIZE
`ALL PRE—SELECTED
`
`VALUES ?
`
`YES
`
`CALCULA TE DIFFERENTIAL
`
`CORRECTION VAL UES
`
`115 118
`
`1“
`
`PROCEED TO
`ACTUAL USE
`
`122
`
`MEASURE OPERA TIONAL
`TRANSDUCER PRESSURE VALUES
`
`SELECT FROM DA TA TABLE THE
`NEAREST TABLE VALUES FOR
`EACH MEASURED VALUE
`
`CALCULA TE TMP
`
`I24
`
`126
`
`J28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`Fzgure 8
`
`OPERA TION
`CoM1;LETE
`
`
`
`
`
`YES
`
`130
`
`END
`
`000008
`
`Nipro EX. ‘I011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000008
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 25, 2003
`
`Sheet 7 of 7
`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`534\®
`
`463
`
`//
`
`486
`
`412
`
`'4 /
`/
`/
`F“ / 445
`359 / 397
`/
`309 // 345
`257 // 298
`,7
`°,
`203 // 247
`/
`
`Wm
`
`I52 /
`0
`
`196
`
`101
`
`o
`
`146
`
`500
`
`—\ 450

`3; 400
`.\
`LE 35
`\.«
`E 300
`9;
`vs
`:3 250
`0.
`§ 200
`9)
`<: 150
`Ln
`E
`
`100
`
`50
`
`47 / 96
`44
`100
`
`. 0,0
`-50 0 50
`_V 501
`'4
`
`150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
`APPLIED PRESSURES (Fa) G’ (Wu)
`
`-63
`
`Figure 9
`
`000009
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000009
`
`

`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`1
`ASSOCIATED PARAMETER MEASURING
`AND/OR MONITORING SUCH AS IN THE
`EVALUATION OF PRESSURE DIFFERENCES
`
`This patent document claims the benefit of the U.S.
`Provisional Application having the Ser. No. 60/147,958;
`filed on Aug. 9, 1999.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention generally involves means and
`The present
`methods for measuring and/or monitoring parametric differ-
`ences between associated fluid materials and is more par-
`ticularly directed to measuring a pressure difference between
`fluids separated by a semi-permeable membrane. Pressure
`difference monitoring according to this invention presents a
`distinct advantage in extracorporeal blood systems, particu-
`larly in a procedure called therapeutic plasma exchange
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Many fluid systems require accurate measurements of
`various properties and/or parameters of the fluids flowing
`therethrough. In some of these systems,
`the importance
`derives from the measurements of individual parameters. In
`other cases, it is the change or difference in parameters that
`is important. In either event, the accuracy required for each
`particular fluid system may vary according to the particular
`fluid(s) involved and/or depending on the purpose of that
`system.
`An example of a fluid system having special requirements
`which can be significantly impacted by the accuracy of
`parametric measurements, particularly involving pressure
`determinations, is a blood flow system outside the body, also
`known as an extracorporeal blood system. An extracorporeal
`blood system usually includes a device for processing the
`blood flowing therethrough. There are numerous types of
`such devices. Filtration devices having semi-permeable
`membranes are commonly used in extracorporeal blood
`systems such as those used in dialysis or therapeutic plasma
`exchange
`The primary purpose of a semi-permeable
`membrane is usually to provide for the removal or separa-
`tion of certain elements or components from the blood. Urea
`and other waste products are removed from blood in
`dialysis, and blood plasma is separated from the red blood
`cells in TPE. The processed blood or red blood cells are then
`returned to the patient.
`More specifically,
`in an extracorporeal blood system
`using a semi-permeable membrane device, the process is as
`follows. Blood is removed from the patient, passed along
`and in contact with one side of a semi-permeable membrane.
`Unwanted portions of the blood (urea in dialysis, plasma in
`TPE) diffuse or
`filter
`through the pores of the semi-
`permeable membrane. The blood remaining on the blood
`side of the semi-permeable membrane is then returned to the
`patient with less of the unwanted substance.
`Poor accuracy of pressure measurements in this art can
`create problems for the blood cells flowing through such a
`system. Excessive pressures or pressure differentials may
`cause red blood cells to become stuck in certain components
`of the system such as in the pores of a semi-permeable
`membrane and/or, at worst, these red cells may be pushed
`into or against certain system components until the red cells
`burst, a consequence called hemolysis. Repetitive red cell
`destruction in this fashion would then result in a reduction
`
`in the number of red blood cells available for carrying
`oxygen to the other cells of the body. Asubstantial reduction
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`in red blood cells can thereby lead to oxygen deficiency
`injury or death. On the other hand, insufficient pressure
`differences in extracorporeal blood systems will result in
`less effective separation of the blood components from each
`other, as for example, of urea from the blood in a dialysis
`system, or of red blood cells from plasma in apheresis or
`therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).
`The performance of semi-permeable membrane systems,
`and indeed of the membranes themselves, depends, in part,
`on the pressure difference across the membrane which is
`called the trans-membrane pressure (TMP). Generally, as the
`TMP across the membrane increases, more unwanted sub-
`stances pass through it. If the TMP on the membrane is large
`enough, the membrane will rupture or the blood will be
`damaged as described above. Therefore, there is often a
`desire to make the TMP as high as possible to make the
`treatment proceed faster, but not so high as to damage the
`membrane or the blood. The more accurately the TMP can
`be measured, the closer to the damage point the treatment
`can be performed.
`Pressure difference monitoring across a semi-permeable
`membrane has been conventionally performed using two
`pressure transducers in the fluid system, one on each side of
`the membrane. Pressure readings are then taken and, either
`manually or using a microprocessor, one measured pressure
`is subtracted from the other. The resulting pressure differ-
`ence is the trans-membrane pressure (TMP) referred to
`above. Also, because the fluid pressure varies along the
`length of the membrane, additional pressure transducers
`have also been used on either or both sides of a membrane
`
`to improve the accuracy of the ultimate TMP calculation.
`Average pressures on either or each side of the membrane
`can thus be obtained and these resulting average pressures
`subtracted one from the other to yield a better approximation
`of the actual pressure difference across the membrane.
`More particularly, in conventional extracorporeal blood
`systems using a semi-permeable membrane disposed inside
`a filter device,
`it
`is common to measure the pressures
`outside, yet near the filter device with pressure transducers
`disposed adjacent the inlet and outlet of the filter device on
`the blood side of the membrane and adjacent the outlet of the
`filtrate side of the membrane. This allows calculation of an
`
`average TMP with the formula:
`
`Blood Inlet + Blood Outlet
`
`Average TMP =
`
`2
`
`— Filtrate Outlet
`
`On the other hand, the maximum TMP experienced by the
`membrane needs only two of these transducer readings;
`namely, the pressure measurement at the blood inlet to the
`filter device and the measurement at the filtrate outlet. Thus,
`this maximum TMP maybe expressed as:
`Maximum TMP=Blood Inlet—Filtrate Outlet.
`
`Thus, using three pressure transducers, one each at the blood
`inlet, blood outlet and filtrate outlet, both the average and
`maximum TMP’s can be calculated. Note,
`the semi-
`permeable membrane performance is generally associated
`with the average TMP, whereas failure of the membrane is
`usually related to the highest TMP experienced by the
`membrane.
`
`Nonetheless, both of these (and all other conventional)
`methods also depend for accuracy upon the precision of the
`transducers used. And, most measuring systems have some
`inherent inaccuracy associated with them. Indeed, pressure
`
`000010
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000010
`
`

`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`3
`transducers in this field commonly exhibit 110% error in
`accuracy each relative to the actual pressure at that respec-
`tive point in the fluid system. A linearity error of 11% can
`also be expected. When using two or more of such trans-
`ducers to determine a pressure difference, these error mar-
`gins can then be compounded.
`For example, in a typical pressure transducer system for
`an extracorporeal blood system which has an inaccuracy of
`110% for each transducer measurement, the overall accu-
`racy of the pressure difference when measured with a two
`transducer system may be reduced by as much as a first
`110% from the first measurement. And, it may experience a
`still further accuracy reduction of an additional 110% from
`the second measurement. This invention is intended to
`
`address this compounding of measurement error.
`It is further apparent that there remains a distinct need for
`continued improvements in parametric monitoring particu-
`larly in fluid pressure difference evaluation which provides
`for more accurately determining the difference between the
`pressures occurring on both sides of a semi-permeable
`membrane. Better accuracy in pressure difference measure-
`ments will provide better achievement of target pressure
`differences in practice to substantially eliminate hemolysis
`and improve fluid component separation. It is toward all of
`these ends that the present invention is directed.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention is directed to means and methods
`for approximating pressure differentials experienced in a
`fluid system. More particularly,
`the present
`invention
`involves using preliminarily measured and/or calculated
`correction quantities to modify the operationally measured
`pressure values to arrive at a closer approximation of the
`actual pressure differential.
`In general,
`the correction quantities used herein are
`obtained by preliminarily pressurizing the system pressure
`transducers to various pre-selected pressures and recording
`the corresponding preliminarily measured values for each
`transducer in a data table for later use as or in the derivation
`
`of correction quantities. A first use of such correction
`quantities is to interpolate between the two closest data table
`values relative to the operationally measured pressure value
`and use the resulting interpolated value as the corrected
`pressure value. This sort of interpolation may be performed
`for each of two pressure transducers, one on each side of the
`membrane. The resulting corrected pressure values are then
`subtracted from each other to obtain the corrected pressure
`difference or TMP. An alternative of this correction scheme
`
`involves using data table correction quantities of a reference
`pressure transducer in the interpolation calculations of the
`two membrane pressure transducers.
`Similarly, other correction quantities can be recorded in a
`data table during a preliminary pressurization phase as
`describe briefly above. For example, the respective differ-
`ences between the two preliminarily measured pressures of
`each of the trans-membrane pressure transducers may be
`recorded as correction quantities for each preliminarily
`applied pressurization. These correction quantities can then
`be used to mathematically modify the operationally mea-
`sured pressure differential during actual fluid flowing use.
`Also, a reference transducer can be used here as well such
`that the differences between one membrane transducer and
`the reference transducer can be recorded in the data table as
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`one set of correction quantities, and the differences between
`the other membrane transducer and the reference can be
`
`65
`
`recorded as a second set of correction quantities. Both
`correction quantities may then be used in the ultimate
`
`4
`determination of the pressure difference across the
`membrane, the TMP.
`Other fluid parameters such as temperature, volume,
`flowrate and the like can also be better evaluated according
`to the present invention. For the purposes hereof, fluids
`include gases and/or liquids.
`Accordingly, the primary object of the present invention
`is to provide improved accuracy in determining the param-
`eters exhibited in a fluid system, particularly in determining
`pressure differentials in fluid systems having two or more
`fluids separated by a membrane.
`A further object is to improve pressure differential accu-
`racy using only two pressure transducers; one on each side
`of a membrane.
`
`A still further object is to improve pressure differential
`accuracy using two pressure transducers; one on each side of
`a membrane both modified relative to a third pressure
`transducer.
`
`These and other features of the present invention will be
`further illuminated in the following detailed description read
`in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which are
`described briefly below.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an extracorporeal fluid
`system in which the pressure monitoring means and methods
`of the present invention may be used;
`FIG. 2 is an isometric view of an extracorporeal fluid
`apparatus generally incorporating an extracorporeal system
`such as that shown in the schematic of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a fluid system like that
`shown in FIG. 1 as incorporated on the extracorporeal
`apparatus of FIG. 2;
`FIG. 4 is an isometric view of a disposable pressure
`component which may be used in accordance with the
`present invention;
`FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the disposable pressure
`component of FIG. 4 taken along line 5—5 thereof;
`FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a pressure tubing system
`which may be internally incorporated into the apparatus
`shown in FIGS. 2 and 3;
`FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a method for improved
`parameter monitoring according to the present invention;
`FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an alternative method for
`improved parameter monitoring according to the present
`invention; and
`FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of an example of
`preliminarily applied pressure values and the corresponding
`preliminarily measured pressure values.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`The present invention is primarily directed to means and
`methods for measuring pressure differentials, an exemplary
`use of which is shown in the attached drawings. As dis-
`cussed below, this invention can be used in numerous fluid
`systems. Use in one preferred system, generally referred to
`as dialysis, will now be described. The general term dialysis
`as used here includes hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemo-
`diafiltration and therapeutic plasma exchange, among other
`similar treatment procedures. In dialysis generally, blood is
`taken out of the body and exposed to a treatment device to
`separate substances therefrom and/or to add substances
`thereto, and is then returned to the body.
`An extracorporeal blood treatment system capable of
`performing general dialysis (as defined above,
`including
`
`00001 1
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000011
`
`

`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`5
`
`TPE) is shown and identified in the attached drawings by the
`reference numeral 10. In particular and as shown primarily
`in FIG. 1, system 10 generally comprises a blood tubing
`circuit 12 having first and second tubing segments 14 and 16
`which are both connected to the vascular system of a patient
`18 via access and return devices 17 and 19, respectively.
`Devices 17 and 19 are preferably cannulas, catheters,
`winged needles or the like as understood in the art. Tubing
`segments 14 and 16 are also connected to a filtration or
`processing unit 20. In dialysis, filtration unit 20 is a dialyzer,
`which is also often referred to as a filter. In TPE, it may also
`be referred to as a plasma filter. Filtration unit 20 is shown
`schematically divided into a primary chamber 21 separated
`from a secondary chamber 22 by a semi-permeable mem-
`brane 23 (not shown in detail). In this extracorporeal system
`10, primary chamber 21 accepts blood flow from blood
`circuit 12 and, as described below, processing fluid flows in
`and through secondary chamber 22. Aperistaltic pump 24 is
`disposed in operative association with the first tubing seg-
`ment 14 and an air bubble trapping drip chamber 25 is
`shown in the second tubing segment 16. A bubble detector
`26 is often included on or adjacent the bubble trap 25.
`Numerous other component devices of blood circuit 12 are
`preferably also included as, for example, the three pressure
`sensors 27, 28, and 29 as well as the tubing clamps 30 and
`31.
`
`Also shown schematically in FIG. 1 is the processing fluid
`or filtrate side of system 10 which generally comprises a
`processing fluid circuit 40 having first and second process-
`ing fluid tubing segments 41 and 42. As mentioned, each of
`these tubing segments is connected to the secondary cham-
`ber 22 of filtration unit 20. In this schematic, a respective
`fluid pump 44, 46 is operatively associated with each of
`these tubing segments 41 and 42. First tubing segment 41 is
`also connected to a processing fluid source 48 which may
`include electrolytes pre-mixed therein or which may be
`added by an online source 50 (or multiple sources, not
`shown).
`In dialysis,
`the processing fluid is a dialysate
`mixture preferably including sodium bicarbonate, inter alia,
`as is known in the art. A fluid bag 49 (or bags) (see FIGS.
`2 and 3, below) may be used in lieu of sources 48 and 50.
`Dry powder canisters (not shown) may also be used as is
`known in the art. Second tubing segment 42 is connected to
`a waste collection device which, as shown schematically in
`FIG. 1 could be a drain 52. The waste device is also
`
`commonly a waste container such as a bag 53 (not shown in
`FIG. 1, but see description relative to FIGS. 2 and 3, below).
`Apressure sensor 54 is also disposed in second dialysis fluid
`tubing segment 42. At
`times in TPE and certain other
`dialysis procedures, no processing fluid is added or pumped
`into the system. Rather, only filtrate may be removed
`through the membrane 23 and pumped out of the filtration
`device 20 through tubing segment 42.
`FIG. 1 shows and the above description describes a
`system which is common as a basic model for numerous
`dialysis procedures including TPE. Additional fluid lines,
`circuits, and componentry may be added (or deleted) to
`increase treatment options. Shown in more detail in FIGS. 2
`and 3 is an apparatus 60 which may be used to provide the
`basic fluid circuits shown in FIG. 1 as well as some
`
`additional features with which the present invention may be
`used. Though less complex apparatuses may be available for
`use with the present invention, it is preferred to be employed
`with an apparatus such as apparatus 60 as described and
`shown herein. In particular, FIGS. 2 and 3 depict an extra-
`corporeal blood processing or dialysis apparatus 60 which
`provides numerous treatment options which are controlled
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`and/or monitored via the control/display screen 61. Touch-
`screen controls may be incorporated herewith and/or other
`conventional knobs or buttons (not shown) may be used.
`Other and more detailed information regarding an example
`apparatus 60 may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,679,245;
`5,762,805; 5,776,345 and 5,910,252; inter alia.
`A general dialysis treatment procedure as performed, for
`example, with an apparatus 60, will now be described with
`reference to FIGS. 2 and 3. First, blood is removed from the
`patient 18 via access device 17 and flows through access line
`14 to the apparatus 60 and filter 20. Apparatus 60 and filter
`20 process this blood according to a selected one or more of
`a number of extracorporeal blood treatment protocols and
`then return the processed or treated blood to the patient 18
`through return line 16 and return device 19 inserted in or
`otherwise connected to the vascular system of the patient 18.
`The blood flow path to and from the patient 18, which
`includes the access device 17, the access line 14, the filter
`20, as well as the return line 16 and return device 19 back
`to the patient forms the blood flow circuit 12 such as the
`schematic one shown and described relative to FIG. 1 above.
`
`Each of the treatment protocols used by apparatus 60
`preferably involves passing the blood in the blood circuit 12
`through filtration unit 20. The filtration unit 20 uses a
`conventional semi-permeable membrane (not specifically
`shown in FIGS. 2 and 3) which, as described above, divides
`the filter 20 into primary and secondary chambers 21 and 22
`(also not specifically shown in FIGS. 2 and 3). The semi-
`permeable membrane confines the blood in the primary
`circuit 12 to the primary chamber 21. The semi-permeable
`membrane allows matter or molecules from the blood in the
`
`primary chamber 21 to migrate (by diffusion or convection)
`across the semi-permeable membrane into the secondary
`chamber 22, and generally may also allow matter or mol-
`ecules from the secondary chamber to diffuse across the
`semi-permeable membrane from secondary chamber 22 into
`the blood in the primary chamber 21. Each treatment pro-
`tocol here generally involves removing extracorporeally
`undesired matter from the blood and/or adding extracorpo-
`really desirable matter to the blood.
`First pressure sensor 27 is shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 as it
`is connected in the access line 14 (this connection is shown
`better in FIG. 3). The first pressure sensor 27 allows the fluid
`pressure in the access line 14 to be monitored independently
`as well as being used in measuring the trans-membrane
`pressure (TMP) as is described below.
`The first peristaltic pump 24 is also shown as operably
`connected to the access line 14 and controls the rate of blood
`
`flow through the blood circuit 12. Typically, the first pump
`24 is operated when the blood to be treated is withdrawn
`from an artery or vein of the patient 18 through access
`device 17. The first pump 24 creates a pressure downstream
`thereof in the access line 14 which is higher than the blood
`pressure in the patient’s return blood vessel in which the
`return device 19 is inserted. The pressure differential created
`by the first pump 24 draws the blood from the vascular blood
`source through the access device 17, and forces it through
`the blood circuit 12, the filtration unit 20 and back through
`the return line 16 and return device 19 into the lower
`
`pressure environment of the patient’s return blood vessel.
`Second pressure sensor 28 is connected in the blood
`circuit 12 between the first pump 24 and the blood entrance
`into the filter 20. Besides being used for calculation of the
`TMP as described hereinbelow, another general function of
`the second pressure sensor 28 is to detect and monitor the
`pressure of the blood supplied to the entrance to the filter 20.
`
`000012
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`Nipro Ex. 1011
`
`000012
`
`

`
`US 6,526,357 B1
`
`7
`This information may be used to indicate an alarm, for
`example, if the blood pressure at the entrance falls below a
`predetermined value, in which case blood may be leaking.
`A third pressure sensor 29 is connected at or near the
`outlet of the filter 20. Here also, a featured purpose of sensor
`29 is in the determination of the TMP; however, another of
`its functions is to monitor the pressure of the blood in the
`return line 16 at the exit from the filter 20 for comparison
`with the pressure sensed by the sensor 28 such that the
`integrity of the flow path through the filter 20 can be
`monitored and, in particular, clotting of blood inside filter 20
`can be detected. In addition, if the return pressure detected
`by the third pressure sensor 29 is below a pre-selected level,
`disconnection of the return line 16 or the return device 19
`
`may be indicated.
`A bubble detector 26 is shown in FIG. 2 as preferably
`connected in the blood circuit 12 on apparatus 60 down-
`stream of the third pressure sensor 29. The bubble detector
`26 is one of many known in the art and its function is to
`detect the possible presence of bubbles and microbubbles in
`the treated blood being returned to the patient 18 in the
`return line 16. Abubble trap 25 is not shown in FIGS. 2 or
`3. This illustrates a concept known in the art that a bubble
`trap is not required though it had customarily been preferred
`in these procedures as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 1.
`Downstream of bubble detector 26, a return clamp 31 is
`also shown as preferably connected in the blood circuit 12.
`Return clamp 31 selectively allows or terminates the flow of
`blood through the blood circuit 12. Preferably, return clamp
`31 may be activated whenever air is detected in the blood by
`bubble detector 26.
`
`It is desirable when performing any of the various extra-
`corporeal treatments possible using the apparatus 60 that
`anticoagulant be added to the blood in the blood circuit 12.
`The anticoagulant is preferably added to the blood prior to
`its delivery to the filter 20 in order to prevent undesirable
`coagulation of the blood resulting from contact of the blood
`with the semi-permeable membrane and/or other compo-
`nents within the blood circuit 12. To add the anticoagulant,
`a pump 62 (see FIG. 2) on apparatus 60 is connected to an
`anticoagulant container 64 to deliver anticoagulant through
`an anticoagulant line 65 to the blood in tubing segment 14.
`The anticoagulant container 64 is preferably a conventional
`syringe having a barrel and a plunger, and the pump 62 is a
`mechanical drive device to move the plunger into the barrel,
`thereby dispensing the anticoagulant into the blood in the
`blood circuit 12 on either a continuous or periodic basis. The
`anticoagulant container may also be a container connected to
`scales which weigh the content of the anticoagulant in the
`anticoagulant container. In such a case (not shown), pump
`62 would preferably be a peristaltic pump (also not shown)
`which would deliver the anticoagulant from the anticoagu-
`lant container through the anticoagulant line 65.
`It is sometimes desirable when performing certain treat-
`ments using the apparatus 60, such as in TPE procedures, to
`add a replacement fluid to the blood flowing in the blood
`circuit 12. The replacement fluid adds material to the blood
`in order to adjust the pH of the blood, to add nutrients to the
`blood, or to add fluid to the blood (as in TPE), among other
`options known in the art. A second peristaltic pump 66 is
`connectable to the blood circuit 12 either before the entrance
`
`of the blood into the filtration unit 20 (not shown), or as
`shown in FIG. 3, after the exit of the blood from the filter 20.
`The second pump 66 delivers the replacement fluid from a
`replacement fluid container or bag 68 through a replacement
`fluid line 70.
`
`8
`The secondary flow circuit 40 is also shown in FIGS. 2
`and 3 as it interacts with apparatus 60 and filter 20. The
`secondary flow circuit 40 is connected to the secondary
`chamber 22 (see FIG. 1) of filter 20. Matter extracorporeally
`removed from the blood is removed from the secondary
`chamber 22 of filter 20 through the outlet tubing segment 42
`of the secondary flow circuit 40, and matter extracorporeally
`added to the blood is moved into filter 20 through inlet
`tubing segment 41 of the secondary flow circuit 40. The
`secondary flow circuit 40 generally includes a fluid source
`suc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket