throbber
Proc. Natd Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 78, No. 8, pp. 4936-4940, August 1981
`Biochemistry
`
`Cloning and analysis of strong promoters is made possible by the
`downstream placement of a RNA termination signal
`(promoter efficiency/RNA synthesis/RNA polymerase/gene expression)
`REINER GENTZ*, ANNETTE LANGNER*, ANNIE C. Y. CHANGt, STANLEY N. COHENt, AND
`HERMANN BUJARD*t
`*Molekulare Genetik der Universitat, 6900 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany; and tDepartments of Genetics and Medicine, Stanford University Medical
`Center, Stanford, California 94305
`Contributed by Stanley N. Cohen, May 29, 1981
`
`Downstream placement of a strong transcrip-
`ABSTRACT
`tional termination signal has made possible the cloning of bacte-
`riophage T5 promoters known to exhibit high signal strength. The
`cloning system constructed contains two easily assayable indicator
`functions whose expression is controlled by the integration of pro-
`moters and terminators, respectively. By assessing transcription
`within the indicator regions, the efficiency of promoters as well
`as termination signals can be determined in vitro and in vivo.
`
`The efficiency of interaction between Escherichia coli RNA
`polymerase and transcriptional promoters of E. coli varies
`within a wide range when measured in vitro (1). For unregu-
`lated promoters, the rate ofcomplex formation in vitro reflects
`promoter strength in vivo (1, 2). However, despite the iden-
`tification of more than 80 different promoter sequences and
`extensive study of promoter-RNA polymerase interactions (for
`survey, see refs. 3-5), the contribution of specific structural
`features to the functional activity of such sequences is not
`understood.
`Promoters from various bacterial and viral sources have been
`cloned in E. coli, and their signal strength in vivo has been stud-
`ied by using expression from distal promoterless sequences en-
`coding (3-galactosidase ((-Gal) or other proteins (6, 7) as an in-
`dicator of promoter activity. Attempts to clone small DNA
`fragments carrying the strong promoters of bacteriophage T5,
`which in vitro far exceed other promoters in the rate ofcomplex
`formation with RNA polymerase and the rate of initiation of
`RNA synthesis (1, 2), have been unsuccessful; however, frag-
`ments of T5 DNA containing both a strong promoter and a
`strong termination signal have been cloned (8). Subsequently,
`electron microscope analysis has shown that transcriptional re-
`gions of several E. coli plasmids are organized in well-defined
`units where termination signals appear to balance transcription
`initiated at promoters ofdifferent strengths (9). Together, these
`findings suggested that the cloning of strong promoter signals
`from phage T5 or other sources might require the downstream
`placement of comparably strong termination signals.
`We report here the construction and analysis of bacterial
`plasmid vectors that enable the cloning of promoters of high
`signal strength; such cloning is made possible by the positioning
`ofa transcriptional termination signal downstream from the site
`ofinsertion ofsuch promoters. The constructed plasmids, which
`allow estimation ofthe strength ofpromoter signals in vitro and
`in vivo, contain indicator genes in positions that also permit
`selection for termination signals. Using these vectors, we have
`isolated a library of T5 promoter sequences suitable for bio-
`chemical and physical investigations of promoter function and
`
`The publication costs ofthis article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertise-
`ment" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`also potentially useful for achieving high-level transcription of
`heterologous genes introduced distal to the promoter signals.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Restriction endonucleases, E. coli DNA polymerase, and bac-
`teriophage T4 DNA ligase were purchased from several com-
`mercial sources, and reactions were carried out as suggested by
`the supplier. EcoRI synthetic linker and adapter sequences
`were obtained from Collaborative Research (Waltham, MA).
`Phagefd DNA (replicative form) and plasmid pAD16/30 con-
`taining a 28-base-pair (bp) HindIII/BamHI adapter sequence
`were gifts from H. Schaller. lac repressor was a gift from A.
`Riggs. Isolation of bacteriophage T5 DNA (2), plasmid DNA
`(10), E. coli RNA polymerase (2), and termination factor rho
`(11) have been described previously.
`The binding of RNA polymerase to promoters and subse-
`quent analysis of the complexes by nitrocellulose filter binding
`have been described (2). Identification and isolation of lac op-
`erator-containing DNA fragments by repressor binding utilized
`the procedure of Riggs et al (12). The conversion of protruding
`5' single-stranded DNA extensions to blunt ends and DNA lig-
`ation reactions have been described (13). Synthetic linker and
`adapter sequences were present in 3- to 10-fold excess relative
`to the various DNA fragments. Transformation ofE. coli strains
`C600r-m' (our laboratory collection), the M15 deletion-mutant
`DZ 291 (obtained from A. V. Fowler), and BMH71-18, an MiS
`derivative carrying the laCjq mutation (obtained from B. Muel-
`ler-Hill), was carried out as described (14).
`Selection oftransformants involved plating on LB plates con-
`taining chloramphenicol (Cm, 20 Ag/ml), ampicillin (Ap, 100
`gg/ml), or varying amounts of tetracycline (Tc; 2-70 tug/ml).
`Selection for presence of the lac operator or production of the
`a fragment of (3-Gal was carried out on plates containing the
`antibiotic plus 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl (3-O-galactoside at
`40 ug/ml (15). Induction of lac expression by isopropylthio-
`galactoside was as described (15). In vitro and in vivo RNA was
`prepared and analyzed as described previously (1) except that
`[a-32P]UTP and [32P]phosphate were used for labeling in vitro
`and in vivo, respectively. In vivo RNA was isolated from plas-
`mid-containing C600 cells after a 10-min labeling period.
`
`RESULTS
`Experimental Strategy. We have constructed a family of
`plasmids (Fig. 1) that carry two DNA segments that can be
`brought under the control of a single promoter and are sepa-
`rated by an endonuclease cleavage site suitable for the cloning
`
`Abbreviations: bp, base pair(s); Cm, chloramphenicol; Tc, tetracycline;
`3-galactosidase.
`Ap, ampicillin; (B-Gal,
`
`4936
`
`Mylan v. Genentech
`IPR2016-00710
`Genentech Exhibit 2060
`
`

`
`Biochemistry: Gentz et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981)
`
`4937
`
`Hincil
`
`Hincil
`
`/O
`
`-gal
`
`J
`
`t
`Hpail
`
`BamHI I aSa/l
`+ DNA Pol.
`Ligase
`
`(Hindil)
`
`ca
`
`HindIII
`
`pBU1O
`
`ter.fd
`
`Ligas
`
`-
`
`tet
`
`HindIII
`
`HpaII/DNA
`\
`dII
`
`Pol.
`
`HindIII
`
`EcoRI es
`
`1-
`
`. Ligase, bla(
`
`pBR322
`(EcoRI/DNA Pol./Hindill)
`
`Construction of plasmids for cloning terminators and promoters. A 780-bp DNA fragment carrying the E. coli lac regulatory region
`FIG. 1.
`(promoter/operator: P/O), an NH2-terminal portion of the (3-Gal structural gene ((-gal) sufficient for intracistronic complementation of the M15
`deletion, and a portion of the lacI-gene (I) was isolated from a HincdI digest of pACYC214 plasmid (unpublished data) DNA by repressor binding
`and subsequent adsorption to nitrocellulose (16). By using the Hpa II cleavage site within (-gal, the fragment was reduced in size and provided with
`BamHI and Sal I termini by various subclonings (pBU8, pBACH16). The resulting fragment (leftmost part of the figure) contains the intact control
`region of the lac operon and a portion of the (-gal structural gene encoding 66 NH2-terminal amino acids (a). Introduction of this fragment, by
`blunt-end ligation, into the HindIll site of pACYC184 (17) yielded pBU10, avector suitable for terminator cloning. The major terminator of the
`coliphage fd genome was isolated as a 338-bp Sau3A fragment (18), ligated to a BamHI/Hindl adaptor sequence, and introduced into pBU10 to
`yield pLBU1. Cleavage of the lac sequence in pBU10 byHpa II endonuclease destroyed the lac promoter and, upon cleavage withHindM, liberated
`a fragment containing the lac operator and a region coding for functional a fragment. Integrating this DNA sequence into pBR322 (19) led to pBU12a.
`Finally, replacement of the HindIl/Sal I portion of pBU12a by the HindM/Sal I fragment of pLBU1 containing the fd terminator resulted in
`pBLU3, a vector suitable for the cloning of efficient promoters at the EcoRI site. The regions encoding Cm, Ap, and Tc resistance are indicated as
`cat, bla, and tet, respectively.
`
`these showed that in all instances the fd terminator had been
`inserted in an orientation opposite to the direction of transcrip-
`tion within the fd phage genome (Fig. 2; ref. 18). Sequence
`analysis also revealed a translational stop codon in frame with
`the a protein less than 10 bp downstream from the HindIII
`cleavage site at the junction between the lac-derived segment
`and thefd-derived DNA fragment (Fig. 2); the construct would
`be expected to produce a 71-amino acid a fragment.
`For the cloning of exogenous promoters, the lac promoter
`in the lac tet construct had to be removed or destroyed in such
`
`of transcription termination signals. In the absence of an inter-
`vening terminator, the level of transcription of both segments
`is identical and reflects the efficiency ofthe upstream promoter;
`reduced transcription ofthe distal DNA segment upon insertion
`of a transcription terminator reflects termination efficiency.
`To assay the level of transcription, we chose DNA segments
`that contain genes encoding f-galactosidase (P-gal) activity and
`Tc resistance. Because the NH2-terminal polypeptide (a frag-
`ment) can restore p-Gal activity in lac M15 deletion mutants
`(20), we used just the portion of the lac operon that produces
`a functional a fragment.
`By using efficient termination signals, we expected to obtain
`the stable integration of DNA fragments containing strong pro-
`moters; these could be identified by the relatively high level
`ofTc resistance that resulted from transcriptional read-through
`past the terminator into the distal tet region.
`Construction of Plasmid Vectors. A vehicle for the selective
`insertion oftranscription terminators between the two indicator
`genes was obtained by fusing a 560-bp fragment carrying the
`lac promoter-operator region and part of the lacZ structural
`gene to the tet region ofpACYC184 (Fig. 1). The resulting plas-
`mid, pBU10, has the following properties (Table 1; Fig. 2): (i)
`it complements the M15 deletion of the lac operon; (ii) the Tc
`resistance it specifies is under control of the lac promoter, as
`shown in M151adq strains; (iii) the HindIII cleavage site be-
`tween the lac gene fragment and the tet gene is restored; (iv)
`the stop codon immediately following the HindIII site limits the
`length of the lacZ gene product to 68 amino acids.
`The HindIII cleavage site ofpBUlO was used for the insertion
`of various transcriptional terminators; only the results obtained
`with the major terminator of the bacteriophage fd genome,
`yielding the pLBU1 plasmid (Fig. 1), are described. Insertion
`of this terminator upstream from the tet gene resulted in a 90%
`reduction in the level ofTc resistance but no detectable change
`in the level of p-Gal activity in M15 deletion strains (Table 1).
`Seven independent plasmid isolates from such clones contained
`the expected 352-bp HindIl-generated DNA fragment carry-
`ing the fd terminator. Electrophoretic analysis of all seven
`BamHI-cleaved isolates and DNA sequence analysis of one of
`
`Table 1.
`
`Plasmid
`
`pBU10
`
`pBU12
`
`pLBU1
`
`pLBU3
`
`pGBU207
`
`pBR322
`
`(-Gal activity
`a-Compl.
`Op.-Ind
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+++
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`-
`
`Properties specified by plasmid constructs
`Tc
`E. coli
`resistance,
`jig/ml
`strain
`C600
`20
`M15
`20
`M15iq
`<2
`+IPTG*
`20
`C600
`3
`M15
`3
`C600
`2
`M15
`2
`<1
`C600
`M15
`<1
`C600
`>70
`>70
`M15
`C600
`60
`M15
`60
`The properties of transformed cells were determined by replica plat-
`ing freshly grown cultures (logarithmic phase) at identical densities
`in microtiter dishes. Tc-containing plates were freshly prepared. In-
`cubation was for 14 hr at 37CC. Isogeneic strains before and after trans-
`formation with pBR322 served as controls. Presence of the lac operator
`(Op.-Ind.) was determined in a lac+ background. a-Protein synthesis
`(a-Compl.) was assessed in M15 deletion strains by evaluating the col-
`ony color on plates containing bromochloroindolyl galactoside.
`* Isopropyl thiogalactoside.
`
`

`
`4938
`
`Biochemistry: Gentz et al.
`
`Proc. Nad Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981)
`
`l
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`5' GAATTCGGTCGCTTGTTCAGGGCAGGGTCGTTAAATAGCCGCTTATGTCTATTGCTGGTTTACCGCGGTAGTGATCTTATTTCATTATGGTGAAAGTTGG
`
`120
`
`140
`
`160{
`
`180
`
`200
`
`4;> I--al
`-I44-0
`CACACAGGAAACAGCTATGACCAT ......... AAGCTTGGCCGGATCTAAAGT ......... GGATCCGGCCAAGCTTTAATGCGGTAGTTTATCACAGTTAA
`
`780
`
`800
`
`820
`
`840
`
`,C tet
`ATTGCTAACGCAGTCAGGCACCGTGTATGAAATC- 3'
`
`Nucleotide sequences connecting the various cloned regions of pLBU3. Most leftward is the sequence of unknown origin intervening
`FIG. 2.
`between the EcoRI site (position 1) and the -15 position of the lac promoter (163), followed by the sequence of the lac fragment (163-435) and the
`fd DNA (446-778); the last portion of sequence shows the transition between the fd DNA and the tet region (778-800). Stop codons in all three
`frames are underlined, and translation initiation sites of both the a fragment and the first tet protein are indicated. ----, EcoRI (1), HindHI (435,
`778), and BamHI (778) cleavage sequences; arrows, borders between the sequences of different origins.
`
`a way that a site for the subsequent insertion of promoters was
`retained. To do this, we used the Hpa II cleavage site at position
`-17 of lac (5); a 250-bp fragment was isolated from a Hpa II/
`HindIII double digest of pBU10 and introduced into plasmid
`pBR322 to generate an EcoRI endonuclease cleavage site. Col-
`onies that showed both a reduced level ofTc resistance and the
`presence of a lac operator sequence, which could be detected
`on the multicopy plasmid by its ability to bind the lac repressor
`and induce chromosomal ,3-Gal synthesis, were identified. En-
`donuclease analysis (HindIII/EcoRI double digest, data not
`shown) of plasmids recovered from several isolates yielded two
`types ofvectors; one ofthese (represented by pBU12) harbored
`the expected 253-bp lac fragment, whereas the other (repre-
`sented by pBU12a) yielded a 420-bp fragment.
`DNA sequence analysis (Fig. 2) showed that in pBU12a a 160-
`bp fragment of unknown origin had been inserted between the
`EcoRI site and position -15 of the lac promoter; fortuitously,
`the fragment was found to contain two to three stop codons in
`each ofthe possible translational reading frames (Fig. 2), making
`the fragment an efficient terminator of any translation origi-
`nating upstream from the translation initiation site for the a
`fragment. pBU12a was therefore used for our further experi-
`ments. Replacing the HindIII/ Sal I segment of pBU12a (Fig.
`1) with an identically generated fragment of pLBU1 carrying
`thefd terminator yielded pLBU3 (Fig. 1). Although this plasmid
`contained the tet region and a DNA sequence encoding the a
`fragment of lac, it conferred neither Tc resistance nor /3-Gal
`activity to an E. coli M15 strain (Table 1) and thus seemed to
`be a candidate for the intended T5 promoter cloning vehicle.
`Properties of Constructed Vectors. Expression of both the
`a-complementing peptide and the Tc resistance encoded by
`plasmid pBU10 is regulated by the lac promoter (Table 1);
`expression of the Lac phenotype and Tc resistance occur in
`strain C600 as a result of titration of the lac repressor by the
`operator located on the multicopy plasmid; such induction also
`results in expression of the tet gene carried by the plasmid, in-
`dicating lac promoter control of Tc resistance. The Lac phe-
`notype occurs in the M15 mutant, which has part of the lacZ
`gene deleted from the chromosome, by a complementation. In
`the M 15 lacjq host, which overproduces the lac repressor, both
`lac expression and Tc resistance are repressed. Control of tran-
`scription into both gene segments by the lac promoter is further
`shown by the inducibility of lac expression by isopropyl thio-
`galactoside in the M15 ladq strain, and the concurrent loss of
`expression as a consequence of destruction of the lac promoter
`in the pBU12 plasmid (Table 1).
`
`Interruption of the lac promoter sequence at a Hpa II site
`as described above abolishes the remaining transcription
`through the fd terminator into the Tc gene as well as a com-
`plementation; the residual Tc resistance encoded by pBU12a
`results from a partially restored promoter sequence at the EcoRI
`site, which is located within the -10 region ofthe lac promoter.
`This residual promoter activity is repressed by lac repressor
`[i.e., in the laCIq strain (unpublished data)].
`Cloning of Promoters ofColiphage T5. A population ofabout
`200 short fragments of T5 DNA was obtained by double diges-
`tion of the 120-kilobase phage genome with Hae III and Alu I
`endonucleases. These fragments were ligated with excess syn-
`thetic EcoRI linkers, and the resulting molecules were cleaved
`with EcoRI endonuclease and ligated into the EcoRI cleavage
`site of pLBU3. Transformation of E. coli C 600 and selection
`for both /3-Gal activity and high-level Tc resistance yielded 35
`colonies resistant to Tc concentrations between 8 and 70 pUg/
`ml. Plasmids were isolated from 13 clones resistant to 70 Ag/
`ml, which appeared from earlier experiments using multicopy
`plasmids to be the highest level detectable in E. coli K-12 (21).
`Digestion of the various isolates with EcoRI liberated between
`1 and 10 DNA fragments from each constructed plasmid. Com-
`plexing of such fragment mixtures with RNA polymerase, fol-
`lowed by filter binding analysis, identified between one and
`three fragments of each plasmid that interacted efficiently with
`the enzyme (Fig. 3); these fragments were isolated from poly-
`acrylamide gels and individually recloned in pLBU3. In each
`case, they gave rise to colonies resistant to Tc at 70 jig/ml.
`Plasmids isolated from such clones carried the expected DNA
`fragments, as shown by EcoRI cleavage and gel electrophoresis.
`The promoter library obtained in this way contains about 25
`different strong promoters of coliphage T5 (23).
`Characterization of the pGBU207. One of the above plas-
`mids (pGBU207, Fig. 4) that contained an EcoRI-generated
`fragment of only 212 bp was selected for further study; the ef-
`ficiency RNA polymerase binding to the 212-bp fragment was
`compared with binding to two fragments carrying the previously
`characterized T5 promoters P25 and P26 (25). The results (Fig.
`3) show that the putative promoter (P207) present on the
`pGBU207 plasmid exhibits binding similar to that ofP., and P26,
`which are among the most efficient E. coli RNA polymerase-
`binding sequences identified from any source (26).
`The site(s) ofin vitro transcription occurring on the pGBU207
`plasmid were mapped by analysis of RNA transcripts made on
`plasmid DNA fragments produced by cleavage with different
`restriction endonucleases (Fig. 4). Cutting of the plasmid with
`
`

`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981)
`
`4939
`
`bp
`
`500
`
`750 900
`
`1
`=2
`
`3 4 56
`
`7 8
`
`I
`
`-
`
`150
`
`a
`
`EcoRl
`
`X
`
`Hind Ill
`-
`
`-Lac
`a-gal
`0
`
`BamIll HindIll
`BamHfI
`aspBR322-
`-
`tet
`
`f-d
`ter
`
`EcoRI
`T5 -5
`P207
`-132-
`- 546
`740
`-________________ 890
`500
`NUMBER OF NUCLEOTIDES
`
`0
`
`1000
`
`Analysis of in vitro transcripts of pGBU207. (Upper) Elec-
`FIG. 4.
`trophoretic separation of transcripts obtained under various condi-
`tions (lane 1, molecular weight standard; lanes 2-4, template cleaved
`with EcoRI,HindIl, andBamHl, respectively). The transcripts of 130,
`540, and 900 nucleotides, and the 740-nucleotide RNA terminated by
`the phage fd signal are by far the most abundant products of the plas-
`mids transcription. Lanes 5-7 show transcription of BamHI-digested
`pGBU207 at 50 mM KCl (5), at 50 mM KCl with E. coli rho protein,
`and at 150 mM KCl with GTP replaced by ITP (24). As shown by the
`disappearance of the 740-nucleotide RNA species, low salt and ITP
`abolish the termination. At 50 mM KCl, however, addition of rho pro-
`tein restores termination to about 50% efficiency. Lane 8 shows tran-
`scripts of the covalently closed circular form of the plasmid at 150mM
`KCl. (Lower) Overview of the transcriptional unit. X, 160-bp fragment
`integrated between the EcoRI and the lac DNA; arrows, sizes of tran-
`scripts expected from templates cleaved with various restriction
`endonucleases.
`ment. By appropriately arranging their integration sites relative
`to two independent indicator functions (i.e., the a fragment of
`E. coli p-Gal and the tet region of pBR322), the interactions of
`promoters and terminators can be studied. Placement of stop
`codons between indicator genes uncouples their translation and
`allows use of their easily assayable products to estimate the rel-
`ative efficiency of transcription initiation and termination sig-
`nals. Because the adventitious 160-bp sequence (X in Fig. 4)
`preceding the coding region of the first indicator gene (the a
`peptide) contains stop codons in all three reading frames, any
`translation initiated within the cloned promoter-carrying up-
`stream fragment-is interrupted. This organization oftranslation
`signals not only permits reproducible synthesis of functional a
`and tet protein from translation start sites located within a po-
`lycistronic mRNA but most likely also maintains transcriptional
`polarity at a constant level.
`Bacterial clones that express the products ofthe two indicator
`genes are identified by assaying for different levels ofTc resis-
`tance or screening for lac gene expression, thus enabling the
`cloning of strong terminators as well as promoters. Among the
`highly active terminators found in this way was the major ter-
`minator ofbacteriophagefd, surprisingly integrated in a direc-
`tion opposite to its natural orientation. This signal showed about
`a 93% efficiency of termination in vivo and nearly 100% effi-
`ciency in vitro (Fig. 5), although a major component of the nat-
`ural termination signal [an oligo(dT) stretch downstream from
`the region of dyad symmetry of the terminator] is in a non-
`functional position when the terminator is integrated in the re-
`verse orientation. However, the reverse orientation yields mul-
`tiple stop codons between the lac-derived fragment and the
`termination signal (17), providing conditions for rho-dependent
`termination (27). Consequently, rho protein increases termi-
`nation frequency in vitro 25- to 50-fold (Fig. 4, lane 6). The fact
`
`Biochemistry: Gentz et al
`
`1.6 -
`
`0.5 -
`
`0.3
`
`:-
`
`P25
`- P26
`- P207
`
`AL_-t
`4b
`
`a
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`e
`
`a
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`e
`
`Interaction of cloned coliphage T5 DNA fragments with E.
`FIG. 3.
`coli RNA polymerase. (Left) Two examples from the library of T5 pro-
`moters. Lanes b and c are digests of pGBU34 and pGBU12 with EcoRI.
`In lanes c and e the fragments carrying promoters are identified (ar-
`row) after complexing of the EcoRI digest with limiting concentrations
`of RNA polymerase followed by nitrocellulose filterbinding. Such frag-
`ments were subsequently isolated and recloned. Lane a shows size
`standards (in kilobases). (Right) Nitrocellulose filter binding assay of
`a fragment mixture containing the strong T5 promoters P25 and P26
`[Hpa II digest of HindiI-cleaved T5 DNA (22)] together with the 212-
`bp fragment isolated from pGBU207. Lanes e, d, and c show that the
`extent of polymerase binding at limiting but increasing amounts of
`the enzyme is the same for all the fragments (fragment sizes 400, 310,
`and 212 bp, respectively). Lanes a and b show the control gel for end-
`labeled fragments used to prepare the mixture. Analysis of the filter
`binding assays was on 10% acrylamide gels.
`
`EcoRI endonuclease yielded primarily a single RNA species
`about 130 nucleotides long. The size of the transcript increased
`to 550 nucleotides when a HindIII digest ofpGBU207 was used
`as a template. BamHI-digested DNA yielded transcripts about
`740 and 900 nucleotides long. Correlation of transcript length
`with the distance of the DNA cleavage site from a fixed point
`indicates that, in all ofthese instances, in vitro transcription was
`being initiated at the same promoter and that it progressed to-
`ward the tet region of the plasmid (Fig. 4). These experiments
`also show the functioning of the termination signal introduced
`between the lac fragment and the tet gene; under the high-salt
`conditions used for this in vitro transcription experiment, about
`50% of the transcripts are terminated within thefd DNA frag-
`ment giving rise to the 740-nucleotide RNA, whereas read-
`through transcripts extend to the BamHI cleavage site located
`890 bp downstream from the promoter. The data in lanes 5-7
`of Fig. 4 show that low ionic strength and replacement of GTP
`by ITP abolishes termination at position 740; on the other hand,
`addition of termination factor rho increases the termination ef-
`ficiency at 50 mM KCl 20- to 50-fold.
`To quantitate the intensity of transcription initiated at the
`P207 promoter relative to transcription of other regions of the
`pGBU207 plasmid, transcripts of whole plasmid DNA were
`hybridized to endonuclease fragments of the plasmid (Fig. 5).
`In vivo and in vitro transcriptions from the P207 promoter were
`8 and 15 times, respectively, the transcription initiated at the
`bla promoter, which in turn was about 3 times more frequent
`than transcription ofthe tet region on the pBR322 (control) plas-
`mid. Transcription from P207 into the tet region was prevented
`by the cloned terminator with almost 100% efficiency in vitro
`and about 93% efficiency in vivo.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The plasmid constructs described here permit the analysis of
`different transcription signals within the same genetic environ-
`
`

`
`4940
`
`Biochemistry: Gentz et al.
`
`In vivo
`
`I
`
`740
`
`490
`
`620
`Size, bp
`
`FIG. 5. Comparison of relative amounts of RNA produced under
`the control of P207, Pbl., and Ptt in vitro and in vivo. 32P-Labeled RNA
`made in vitro with pGBU207 and pBR322 as templates and in vivo in
`plasmid carrying C600 cells were hybridized to Southern blots to which
`the following DNA fragments were fixed: 740-bp EcoRI/BamHI frag-
`ment of pGBU207. containing a 600-bp region under control of P207
`(Fig. 4); 620-bpHindIH/Sal I; and 490-bp EcoRI/HincII fragment (the
`last two both were from pBR322 and contained a part of the tet and bla
`regions, respectively). The densitometric tracings of the autoradio-
`grams show the relative amounts of 32P-labeled RNA hybridizing to
`the DNA fragments indicated, The filter-bound RNADNA hybrids
`were extensively treated with RNase prior to autoradiography. The
`pGBU207-derived RNA hybridizing to the 620-bp fragment is the read-
`through product of P207 into the tet region.
`
`that the clonedfd sequence terminates transcription efficiently
`despite the loss ofthe oligo(dT) stretch may be attributed to the
`newly acquired rho function which is not found for the termi-
`nation in the fd genome (22).
`Our plasmid constructs have permitted cloning of promoter-
`carrying fragments from the "early" region ofbacteriophage T5,
`by using selection for read-through past the termination signal
`into the tet region-which results in colonies that are resistant
`to high levels of Tc. All such clones contain plasmids carrying
`at least one T5 DNA segment that binds efficiently to RNA
`polymerase (Fig. 3; ref. 23). We have not been able to stabilize
`such promoter-carrying fragments in any vector system lacking
`an efficient downstream termination signal. In some casess plas-
`mids expressing high-level Tc resistance had a reduced copy
`number. This effect was not observed when a Cm resistance
`gene was used in place of Tc.
`The promoter-containing fragment cloned in pGBU207 binds
`RNA polymerase with high efficiency (Fig. 3) and initiates tran-
`scription toward the tet region, conferring a level of Tc resis-
`tance (70 ,ug/ml) that is 35 times higher than is seen when tran-
`scription is initiated from the lac promoter under comparable
`conditions. This finding is consistent with our analysis of tran-
`scripts produced in vitro from various regions ofpGBU207 plas.
`mid; the P207 promoter yields 15 times the RNA produced by
`the /3-lactamase promoter, which in turn, is about twice as ef-
`ficient as the fully induced lac wild-type promoter (unpublished
`data).
`The system described here allows the quantitative study in
`vivo of transcription initiation and termination signals having
`a wide range of efficiencies. Comparison of in vivo results with
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981)
`signal strength determined in vitro and with the DNA sequence
`should contribute to a better understanding of the
`structure-function relationship of such signals.
`Finally, plasmids such as pGBU207 may be useful as cloning
`vehicles for achieving high levels oftranscription ofexogenously
`derived DNA fragments. Removal of the DNA sequence en-
`coding the a fragment enables positive selection for the inte-
`gration ofexogenously derived DNA fragments because expres-
`sion of Tc resistance by such constructs requires the coupling
`of the tet region to the T5 promoter.
`These studies have been supported by Grants Bu 338/7,10,12 from
`the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to H. B. and National Institutes
`ofHealth Grants AI 08619 and GM 27241 to S. N.C. and by a European
`Molecular Biology Organization Short-Term Fellowship to H.B.
`von Gabain, A. & Bujard, H-. (1979) Proc. NatltAcad. Sci. USA 76,
`1.
`189-193.
`von Gabain, A. & Bujard, H. (1977) Mol Gen. Genet. 157,
`301-311.
`Rosenberg, M. & Court, D. (1979) Annu. Rev. Genet. 13,
`319-353.
`Siebenlist, U., Simpson, R. B. & Gilbert, W. (1980) Cell 20,
`269-281.
`Reznikoff, W. S. & Abelson, J. N. (1978) in The Operon, eds.
`Muller, J. H. & Reznikoff, W. S. (Cold Spring Harbor Labora-
`tory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), pp. 221-243.
`Casadaban, M. J. & Cohen, S. N. (1980) J. Mol Biol 138,
`179-i207.
`West, R. W., Jr. & Rodriguez, R. L. (1980) Gene 9, 175-193.
`Breunig, K. (1979) Dissertation (Universitat Heidelberg, Hei-
`delberg, Federal Republic of Germany).
`Stueber, D. & Bujard, H. (1981) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78,
`167-171.
`Clewell, D. B. & Helinski, D. R. (1969) Proc. Natt Acad. Sci.
`USA 62, 1159-1166.
`Knopf, K. W. & Bujard, H. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 53, 371-385.
`Riggs, A. D., Bourgeois, S., Newby, R. F. & Cohn, M. (1968)].
`Mol Biol 34, 365 -368.
`Backman, K., Ptashne, M. & Gilbert, W. (1976) Proc. Nati. Acad.
`Sci. USA 73, 4174-4178.
`Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C. Y. & Hsu, L. (1972) Proc. Natl Acad.
`Sci. USA 69, 2110-2114.
`Miller, J. H. (1972) in Experiments in Molecular Genetics, ed.
`Miller, S. H. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Har-
`bor, NY), pp. 47-55.
`Landy, A., Olchowski, E., Ross, W. & Reiness, G. (1974) Mol
`Gen. Genet. 133, 273-281.
`Chang, A. C. Y. & Cohen, S. N. (1978) J. Bacteriol 134,
`1141-1156.
`Beck, E., Sommer, R., Auerswald, E. A., Kurz, C., Zink, B.,
`Osterburg, G., Schaller, H., Sugimoto, K., Sugisaki, H., Oka-
`moto, T. & Takanani, M. (1978) Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 4495-4503.
`Bolivar, F., Rodriguez, R. L., Betlach, M. C., Heyneker, H. L.,
`Boyer, H. W., Crossa, J. H. & Falkow, S. (1977) Gene 2, 95-113.
`Ullman, A. & Perrin, D. (1970) in The Lactose Operon, eds.
`Beckwith, J. R. & Zipser, D. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,
`Cold Spring Harbor, NY), pp. 143-172.
`Cabello, F., Timmis, K. & Cohen, S. N. (1976) Nature (London)
`259, 285-290.
`Konings, R. N. & Schoenmakers, G. G. (1978) in The Single-
`Stranded DNA Phages, eds. Denhardt, D. T., Dressler, D. &
`Ray, D. S. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor,
`NY), pp. 507-530.
`Gentz, R. (1981) Diplomarbeit (Universitaet Heidelberg, Hei-
`delberg, Federal Republic of Germany).
`Neff, N. F. & Chamberlin, M. J. (1978) J. Biol Chem. 253,
`2435-2460.
`Stueber, D., Delius, H. & Bujard, H. (1978) Mol Gen. Genet.
`166, 141-149.
`Niemann, A. (1981) Diplomarbeit (Universitat Heidelberg, Hei-
`delberg, Federal Republic of Germany).
`Adhya, S. & Gottesman, M. (1978) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47,
`967-996.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket