`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: August 22, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ROSETTA-WIRELESS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-006221
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, PATRICK R. SCANLON, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Daniel A. Zaheer and Michael Ng
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`Patent Owner filed motions requesting pro hac vice admission of
`Daniel A. Zaheer and Michael Ng in the instant proceeding and submitted
`declarations from Messrs. Zaheer and Ng in support of the motions. Paper
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00616 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`9, 10; Exs. 2014, 2015.2 Petitioner did not oppose the motions. Based on
`the facts set forth in the motions and the supporting declarations, we
`conclude that Patent Owner has established good cause for Messrs. Zaheer’s
`and Ng’s pro hac vice admission in the instant proceeding. See 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(c); Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-
`00639, slip op. at 3–4 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7). Patent Owner’s lead
`counsel, Miranda Y. Jones, is a registered practitioner. Paper 7, 2.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motions for pro hac vice admission
`of Daniel A. Zaheer and Michael Ng are granted, and Messrs. Zaheer and
`Ng are authorized to represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in the
`instant proceeding only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Messrs. Zaheer and Ng are to comply
`with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14,
`2012), and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Title 37,
`Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Messrs. Zaheer and Ng are subject to the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq. and the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`2 Patent Owner filed motions and declarations that appear to be identical in
`Case IPR2016-00616, which has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`See Case IPR2016-00616, Papers 8, 9; Exs. 2015, 2016.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`Megan F. Raymond
`J. Steven Baughman
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`Megan.Raymond@ropesgray.com
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Anish R. Desai
`Megan H. Wantland
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`Brian.Ferguson@weil.com
`Anish.Desai@weil.com
`Megan.Wantland@weil.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Miranda Y. Jones
`Michael F. Heim
`HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P.
`mjones@hpcllp.com
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
