throbber

`
`Baker Hughes Proceedings
`
`|PR2016-00596 (US. Pat. No. 7,134,505)
`
`|PR2016-00597 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,543,634)
`
`|PR2016-00598 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,861,774)
`
`

`

`Unless otherwise noted, all citations herein are to the exhibit
`list for |PR2016-o15o6 (774 patent). This exhibit list is available
`in the Patent Owner Response, Paper 51.
`
`All page citations are to the page numbers added for these
`proceedings, not the native page numbers ofthe article,
`document, etc.
`
`Frequently Cited Exhibits
`2050 - McGowen First Declaration
`2081 - McGowen Supplemental Declaration
`2017 - A. Daneshy First Deposition
`2085 - A. Daneshy Second Deposition
`
`

`

`Thomson
`
`Thomson
`
`3
`
`

`

`Q. And just to be clear, Thomson does
`not disclose pumping fracturing fluid
`into an open-hole annular segment,
`right?
`A. The paper does not describe that,
`no. The paper describes through a
`cemented casing in this case.
`
`Ex. 2085, A. Daneshy Depo. at 54:10-14
`
`4
`
`

`

`Q. Was one of the goals of Ellsworth
`to create multiple fractures through
`open-hole annular segments?
`A. It was not their main goal, no.
`Q. Did they do that?
`A. No, they didn't need to do that.
`That's why they didn't do it.
`
`Ex. 2085, A. Daneshy Depo. at 78:22-79:2
`
`5
`
`

`

`Q. Does the Ellsworth reference
`describe hydraulic fracturing?
`A. It describes acid stimulation,
`and it doesn't get into what
`pressures were used. So it’s not
`easy to discern whether the acid
`fractured the rock or not.
`
`Ex. 2044, V. Rao Depo. at 66:17-67:6
`
`6
`
`

`

`Petitioners must prove a motivation to remove a component.
`
`Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharm., Inc., 696 F.3d 1151, 1163 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`Amkor Tech., Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 692 F.3d 1250, 1260 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`7
`
`

`

`5 4!?TUBING HANGER ;
`
`$
`
`5 -1 F2" T.R.S.C .S_S."-‘.
`
`4 452* :1—11’2“S_P.l'u'l
`
`WALVE :ELANK}
`
`4 -151.“ 11—1fl“S_P.M
`WALVE :ELANK)
`
`$ $$
`
`4 -1|"2" RD SLIDING SLEE‘u'E
`
`5” PER. SEAL ASSEMBLY
`1n.|"|'I'|'I'| ANN. PRESS. RELEASE
`
`3.EBB“R’ NIPPLE
`
`$
`
`$
`$
`
`
`:1 REQFER my
`
`$
`$
`$
`
`?" PERMANENT
`HACKER
`
`11'2“ CYC LE
`4—1"? MSAFTODL
`
`
`
`LUGFSHEAR OUT SUB
`UHECLFEHZDFE}
`
`
`
`8
`
`$
`$
`
`$
`$
`$
`
`Cement &
`
`Cement &
`casing
`
`$
`
`T“ RETRIEVAELE PACKER ca SI n g
`
`

`

`Q. Does the Thompson reference
`explain why the authors use
`cemented casing in the horizontal
`portion of the well?
`A. They don't go into it. As far
`as I can understand, the prior
`wells in that platform had used
`casing and cementing and so -- and
`they were asked to improve the
`efficiency of the prior wells, so
`they continued to use what was
`being used. I doubt it was a
`decision point.
`
`Ex. 2044, V. Rao Depo. at 65:11-19
`
`9
`
`

`

`Safety Risk
`
`Remedial
`Options
`
`Competitor
`Surveillance
`
`Risk of Frac Problems
`
`Formation
`Development
`
`Production
`Impact
`
`Completion
`System Cost
`
`Track Record
`
`10
`
`

`

`Harold McGowen - Fracturing Experience
`• President and CEO, Navidad Resources LLC
`
`• Overseen over 200 wellsites for NRL
`
`• Voted best CEO for a medium size producer (TIPRO)
`
`• Performed multi-year fracturing fluid performance
`study on 1,000 Codell-Niobrara refracs.
`
`• Performed reserves projections and economic
`evaluation of 250+ Bossier/Cotton Valley wells in the
`Bossier trend.
`
`Ex. 2050 at 54
`
`11
`
`

`

`Dr. Ali Daneshy – Fracturing Experience
`• Director of Petroleum Engineering at University of
`Houston
`• VP of Integrated Technology Products at Halliburton
`• SPE Distinguished Lecturer
`• Academic papers related to fracturing
`
`12
`
`

`

`Q. Did you write your report?
`A. Did I write it personally? No.
`[. . .]
`Q. When you say reports, and I may
`have said reports, but we're talking
`about your declarations, right?
`A. Yeah, exactly.
`
`Ex. 2017, A. Daneshy Depo. at 123:24-25, 124:17-20
`
`13
`
`

`

`Q. Well, let me just ask you this.
`What's your understanding of the legal
`test for proving that a patent claim is
`obvious?
`A. You're asking the wrong person. I
`think the definition is somebody -- a
`person of ordinary skill would be able
`to use the -- a person of ordinary skill
`would arrive at that, would come to the
`conclusion, I think. I don't want to
`give you -- because I know this is
`something that is -- I've worked with
`patent lawyers and this is one of those
`subjects that every time you get into
`it, each patent lawyer describes it
`different than others. But if a person
`of ordinary skill would arrive that it
`can be done. Based on existing available
`information, existing knowledge, they
`would say it could be done.
`
`Ex. 2017, A. Daneshy Depo. at 123:24-25, 124:17-20
`
`14
`
`

`

`In the very first declaration that Dr.
`Daneshy gave, he did not render a conclusion
`on the legal issue of obviousness with
`respect to Thomson and its use in an open-
`hole in combination with the Ellsworth
`reference.
`
`Ex. 2085 at 39:22-40:1 (Petitioners’ counsel)
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`16
`
`

`

`an-.L...__..
`
`I..—.I.LA,#flfirififi.
`
`.7.
`
`in“...
`
`l
`
`.11...“
`
`=.._
`
`Ii
`
`
`
`Sllnmrfll;.
`
`.1!!!
`
`I.
`
`17
`17
`
`

`

`
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`
`19
`
`

`

`The P&P approach was the initial lower
`completion methodology that allowed the
`effective deployment of multi-fracture
`treatments in horizontal wells . . .
`
`Ex. 2001 at 5, A. Casero, Open Hole Multi-Stage Completion System in
`Unconventional Plays: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economics, SPE
`164009 (2013); see also Ex. 2050, McGowen Decl. at 26; Paper 51, POR
`at 13-15.
`
`20
`
`

`

`I
`
`-
`
`_
`
`-
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`,r
`
`a
`
`-
`
`'
`
`'_
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`-
`
`.
`
`1;
`
`_
`I“:
`
`_
`
`_.__‘j'_,.
`
`_.
`
`:.
`
`.
`
`.— ._.-
`
`:.
`
`h
`
`’
`
`._
`
`r
`
`'
`
`.—
`
`‘
`
`5
`
`_
`
`“ _
`
`.—
`
`
`
`..4n'
`
`-’
`
`1'.
`
`_'
`’3
`
`\n._
`
`.
`_ q"
`.
`.
`
`‘
`
`-
`
`kl
`
`.
`
`__~
`
`-
`
`‘1. -'
`
`CEMENT
`
`CASED WELLBORE
`
`CEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`t
`
`_
`
`-1;
`
`
`
`-.1'-
`
`-r
`
`
`
`'3
`
`.-_€_=
`
`_
`
`5-
`
`-_
`
`.
`
`—-.-r':
`..__
`
`a
`
`r'
`('1‘.
`
`f
`:
`
`g7}?
`
`
`
`_
`
`.
`
`-_
`-.’
`
`l
`
`r
`
`-
`
`21
`
`

`

`
`
`22
`
`

`

`
`
`23
`
`

`

`
`
`24
`
`

`

`
`
`25
`
`

`

`
`
`26
`
`

`

`
`
`27
`
`

`

`
`
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`2992
`
`

`

`Q. Why does that difference matter?
`MR. GARRETT: Objection, form.
`A. Because the location of the
`fracture influences [well]
`productivity and how the reservoir is
`being depleted. You want uniform
`depletion of reservoir fluid so that
`you get as much of the oil or gas out
`of the formation; and so for that, it
`is better to know more accurately
`where the fractures are located.
`
`Ex. 2017, A. Daneshy Depo. at 21:13-20
`Ex. 2050, McGowen Decl. at 28
`Paper 51, POR at 14
`
`30
`
`

`

`3131
`
`

`

`32
`
`OPEN HOLE WELL
`NO CEMENT
`
`

`

`
`
`33
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`>IA
`
`34
`
`

`

`_..r .
`
`__
`
`.
`
`_
`
`-
`
`-’
`1,
`-
`
`35
`
` w
`
`.-
`
`.
`
`1
`
`_
`
`__
`.'
`
`_ 3--
`
`_ 4‘
`
`_
`
`\
`
`.
`-
`
`-
`
`_.- P 4-
`
`.__
`
`_
`
`.
`
`,_d\
`
`-( .
`.
`“21?;
`1
`
`.,. I
`
`..
`
`_
`
`.
`
`I
`
`.3 _ ,
`
`.
`
`‘I‘E'
`- ;
`_ r:
`a
`'
`
`_._
`
`A
`
`a
`
`,.
`
`- - '
`
`-
`
`:
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`_.
`'1
`
`,
`
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`_r'
`

`
`a
`
`,
`
`_
`
`._-
`
`f
`
`,
`
`II
`
`'
`u
`It
`i
`
`‘
`
`I."
`'!.'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`.» _-.
`
`1-. 3'
`4-" 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`36
`
`

`

`
`
`37
`
`

`

`Plug & Perf
`(Cemented Casing)
`
`Open Hole Multi-Stage
`(No Cemented Casing)
`
`38
`
`

`

`Plug & Perf
`(Cemented Casing)
`
`Open Hole Multi-Stage
`(No Cemented Casing)
`
`39
`
`

`

`Q. What do you mean by that?
`A. You are talking about two systems
`which are very different in the way
`they fracture. In a cemented liner
`completion, as I mentioned, when you
`create a fracture, it is where the
`perforations are. When you use
`external casing packers, the fracture
`-- with ports, with fracture ports --
`the fracture can be anywhere between
`the two external casing packers.
`
`Ex. 2016, A. Daneshy Depo. at 21:5-12
`
`40
`
`

`

`When you fracture the well from
`perforations, your fracture is likely
`to be right at or very near the
`perforation. And since the
`perforations -- the perforated
`interval in the well is a very short
`interval. It could be 12 inches, 18
`inches, as opposed to open space
`between two packers that could be 300
`feet, 400 feet. So when we say
`control, that's the extent of it,
`whether within a few feet or within
`several hundred feet.
`
`Ex. 2016, A. Daneshy Depo. at 29:8-16
`
`41
`
`

`

`A POSITA would be aware that
`there was an optimum distance
`between stages and that
`fracture spacing was critical
`to commercial success.
`
`Ex. 2050, McGowen Decl. at 28
`Paper 51, POR at 13-15
`
`42
`
`

`

`Q. Why would you care about
`controlling where a fracture
`initiates within a 12-to-18-inch
`span versus a 300-to-400-foot
`span?
`A. Because I want to produce the
`well in an optimum fashion. It
`influences the productivity of the
`well.
`
`Ex. 2017, A. Daneshy Depo. at 29:17-23
`
`43
`
`

`

`If you put a fracture at plus 10
`(which is 10 feet from that
`packer, on one side of it) and
`minus 10 (which is 10 feet from
`the packer on the other side of
`it), these two packers are 20 feet
`apart from each other. They
`basically drain the same segment
`of the well. You are not getting
`as much benefit from this as the
`case when the fracture is in the
`100 feet from the packer on one
`side and 100 feet from the packer
`on the other side.
`
`Ex. 2017, A. Daneshy Depo. at 30:6-14
`
`44
`
`

`

`During the period in question,
`it was thought that the
`formation of multiple
`hydraulic fractures that were
`too close together would also
`create complex near wellbore
`fracture geometries that were
`thought to be detrimental to
`successful fracture treatments
`and subsequent production.
`
`Ex. 2050, McGowen Decl. at 29
`Paper 51, POR at 13-15
`
`45
`
`

`

`
`LII:|
`
`huhllllllllfill
`
`46
`
`

`

`
`
`47
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`'-
`a"!
`_‘
`
`“W:
`
`
`
`_
`
`r'
`"
`
`"I.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`_
`
`"
`
`__
`
`'
`
`_
`
`R
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`:
`
`-
`
`_
`
`-
`
`—
`
`'
`
`z.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`,.
`
`‘
`
`I,
`48
`48
`
`-——_
`
`.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`I
`
`-
`
`r
`
`i
`
`v
`
`or
`
`;
`
`- _
`"
`
`«'
`'
`
`_
`
`\
`
`.
`
`I
`
`"
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`-
`r " _
`
`

`

`Fracture diagnostics during the first
`horizontal well revealed an unexpectedly
`complex near- wellbore fracture
`geometry, a result of fracture initiation
`problems. These problems slowed the
`completion process and severely harmed
`the effectiveness of the fracture-to-
`wellbore connection.
`
`Ex. 2066 at 1, Emanuele, SPE 39941 “A Case History:
`Completion and Stimulation of Horizontal Wells with Multiple
`Transverse Hydraulic Fractures in the Lost Hills Diatomite”
`(1998); Ex. 2050, McGowen Decl. at 27-29.
`
`49
`
`

`

`transversely fractured horizontal wellbores are
`still plagued by a number of problems, most
`of which stem from the complex fracture geo-
`metries connecting the wellbore to the main
`fracture. These complex fracture geometries
`usually take the form of multiple fractures,
`twisted fractures, H- or S-shaped fractures
`Ex. 2063 at 2, Crosby, D.G., “Methodology to Predict the Initiation of
`Multiple Transverse Fractures from Horizontal Wellbores” (2001); Ex.
`2050, McGowen Decl. at 27-29.
`
`50
`
`

`

`[A] decision was made to attempt a cased hole
`completion with a perforated interval not to
`exceed two (2) feet. It has been documented
`in literature and field proven that a smaller
`focused perforated interval (2 to 3 feet)
`enables a major fracture system to be initiated
`rather than several minor fractures which
`compete for fracturing fluid and ultimately are
`unable to propagate and extend.
`
`Ex. 2100 at 9, Murray, SPE 37354 “A Case Study for Drilling and
`Completing a Horizontal Well in the Clinton Sandstone” (1996); Ex.
`2081, McGowen Decl. at 24.
`
`51
`
`

`

`Several years ago, conventional wisdom
`held that a few widely spaced long
`length fractures were the best way to
`fully exploit the reservoir and ensure
`maximum economic ultimate recovery.
`
`Ex. 2011 at 4
`
`Paper 51,
`POR at 25
`
`52
`
`

`

`Recent experience has shown, however,
`that numerous closely spaced short
`fractures produce better results over the
`life of the reservoir. This outcome would
`seem to tilt the scale in favor of OHMS
`owing to its superior efficiency, but
`OHMS is not the predominant technique
`in many plays.
`
`Ex. 2011 at 4
`
`Paper 51,
`POR at 25
`
`53
`
`

`

`A. . . . That’s what a single
`fracture would have looked like. When
`you put 20, 30, 40 of these together,
`then they don't look like that.
`Q. What do they look like?
`A. Today the industry uses the term
`“complex” because they don't really
`know what it looks like.
`
`Ex. 2085, A. Daneshy Depo. at 87:16-23
`
`54
`
`

`

`Q. Are persons of skill in the art
`today trying to create complex
`fractures?
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. In the past, would a person of
`skill in the art try and avoid
`complex fractures?
`A. When is "past"?
`Q. The time before 2001.
`A. Yes, when we fractured vertical
`wells, we did not want to create
`complex fractures.
`Ex. 2085, A. Daneshy Depo. at 89:11-22
`
`55
`
`

`

`Q. Back before 2001, how did persons
`of skill in the art expect fractures
`to behave?
`A. They expected them to behave just
`like they did in vertical wells.
`
`Ex. 2085, A. Daneshy Depo. at 81:8-13
`
`56
`
`

`

`
`
`Fig. fi—Nanpiamrfracmr: geanmflifl.
`
`Ex. 2078 at 6 (Abass)
`Ex. 2078 at 6 (Abass)
`
`57
`57
`
`

`

`For a normal hydraulic
`fracturing treatment where
`proppant is used, if there is
`a leak around a packer during
`the hydraulic fracturing
`(“frac”) stage, excessive
`leak-off could cause a screen
`out event, resulting in a
`complete failure of that frac
`stage and loading the hole up
`with proppant that would have
`to be removed at great
`expense.
`
`Ex. 2034, McGowen Decl. at 33
`
`58
`
`

`

`To be effectively fracture stimulated, a
`horizontally drilled well must be cased and
`cemented through the horizontal producing
`section of the well. Casing and cementing
`the horizontal section allows fracture
`initiation points to be controlled in
`placing multiple fractures.
`
`Ex. 2098, Austin, SPE 18263, Simultaneous Multiple Entry Hydraulic
`Fracture Treatments of Horizontally Drilled Wells at 1 (1988); Ex.
`2081 at 24-25; Ex. 2081, McGowen Decl. at 24-25; Paper 51, POR
`at 20-21.
`
`59
`
`

`

`A horizontal well that is to be fracture
`stimulated over multiple zones must be
`cased and cemented.
`
`Ex. 2099, Owens, SPE 25058, Practical Considerations of Horizontal
`Well Fracturing in the “Danish Chalk” at 2 (1992); Ex. 2081,
`McGowen Decl. at 23; Paper 51, POR at 20-21.
`
`60
`
`

`

`Casing and cementing a horizontal well
`is essential to provide zone selectivity
`and isolation during fracture stimulation.
`
`Ex. 2078 at 9, Abass, H., “A Case History of Completing and
`Fracture Stimulating a Horizontal Well” SPE 29443 (1995);
`Paper 51, POR at 20-21.
`
`61
`
`

`

`Perforations play a crucial role in
`achieving a successful fracturing
`treatment in horizontal wellbores.
`
`Ex. 2078 at 9, Abass, H., “A Case History of Completing and
`Fracture Stimulating a Horizontal Well” SPE 29443 (1995);
`Paper 51, POR at 20-21.
`
`62
`
`

`

`EH. Abass. P. Resist. 1. Harry. 1.1.. that. M. Shumwly. N.Gazi
`
`and rapidlyr flattens after foutto five fractures. Based
`on the diminishing slope of the cumulative production
`vs. time cmveat24 months. fourorfive fractltres
`would bathe mosteffeclivenumbetoffracmresfottbe
`subject well. However, afieroonsideting the behavior
`of theWW system, designers considered
`economics and selected three fracmres forthe subject
`
` 5':
`
`lg
`i:
`g 3
`
`lllllllll'l'lill1l1l
`lune-retinal-
`
`flamesfar various rims afierfi-octuring.
`coarse proppam was used as a tail-in stage.
`
`The stimulation treatment was designed to achieve the
`following objectives:
`
`'
`
`To create t'I taut-lit}1 hear the weil'hot'e. To ease the
`neat-wellhcte temicdcn. an acid stage was used to
`communicate all the hydrojetted notches. Fig. 5
`presentsaschematic oftheluugimdinalslou
`created uiahjrdrojetfing. Fig. 9 shouts acenceptual
`tersesentaticn of what might have happened after
`an acid meanem; Fig. Hi shows the mention of the
`mainfiacnneasitinitiatesfromthecafity.
`
`Te prevent the naturni fiuctnres intersecting the
`wetihsrefium initiating and prnpngntmg tnttitipie
`fiucmres. For fluid—loss contcl. lflfl-mesh sand was
`pumped after the pad.
`
`Te heip withstand the high compressive stress near
`the weiihere and reduce the pressure drop resulting
`film: the rudiniflew emergence. High-strength.
`coarse proppant was used as a tail-in stage.
`
`
`
`Fig. ?—Cwnuiative iiquid praduerian vs. the number of
`
`Stimulation Treatment
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Thesumdanunueannemwasdesignedtoachievetbe
`following objectives:
`
`Fig. 9—Concepmal representation qf who: might have
`M
`qfisranacidm
`_
`
`0
`
`0
`
`-
`
`To create a cavity hear the weil'bore. To ease the
`neat-wellbore restriction. an acid stage was used to
`communicate all the hydrojemed notches. Fig. 8
`presents a schematic of the Iongimdinal slats
`created via bydrojetfing. Fig. 9 shows a conceptual
`regesenmtion of what might have happened after
`an acid meannent. Fig. 10 shows the creation of the
`mainframeasitiuitiateefromdiecavity.
`To prevent the natural fractures intersecting the
`weiibarefiom initiating and propagating multiple
`fiucmres. For fluid—loss cootol, IOU-mesh sand was
`pumped after the pad.
`To help withstand the high massive stress near
`the weiibore and reduce the pressure drop matting
`from the mdiaiflow emergence. High-strength.
`
`Fig. IG—Creatian ofthe minfincmre at iriniriatesfivm
`the cavity.
`
`7 of9
`
`Ex. 20?B
`|PR2016-01506
`
`Ex. 2078 at 9, Abass, H., “A Case History of Completing and
`Ex. 2078 at 9, Abass, H., ”A Case History of Completing and
`Fracture Stimulating a Horizontal Well” SPE 29443 (1995);
`Fracture Stimulating a Horizontal Well” SPE 29443 (1995);
`Paper 51, POR at 20-21.
`Paper 51, POR at 20-21.
`
`63
`
`

`

`Successful liner installation and
`cementation is considered a
`prerequisite to ensure adequate
`zonal isolation for multiple
`fracture treatments in horizontal
`wells.
`
`Ex. 2079 at 1, Damgaard, A.P., “A Unique Method for
`Perforating, Fracturing, and Completing Horizontal Wells” SPE
`19282 (1992); Paper 51, POR at 20-21.
`
`64
`
`

`

`In the Red Oak horizontal, the geologic
`expectation was to cross natural fractures and
`yield economic production without fracture
`stimulation. Natural fractures were not
`encountered and production was uneconomic
`from the openhole. Thus, the contingency
`plan to set and cement a liner to pump
`multiple transverse fractures was
`implemented.
`
`Ex. 1023 at 3, P.D. Ellis, Application of Hydraulic Fractures in Openhole
`Horizontal Wells, SPE 65464 (2000); Paper 41 Surreply at 3.
`
`65
`
`

`

`The main benefit of horizontal holes comes
`from their long contact with the permeable
`reservoir. Casing and perforating these
`holes reduces this contact. However,
`whenever completion operations require
`hydraulic fracturing, the horizontal
`holes are in fact cased, cemented, and
`perforated to facilitate effective
`fracturing.
`
`Ex. 2015, Encyclopedia of Hydrocarbons, at p. 8 (2007); Paper 51,
`POR at 21.
`
`66
`
`

`

`Some of the features of the OHMS approach
`are often depicted as disadvantages, such as
`the inferred inability to control the initiation
`point of the fractures. . . .
`
`Ex. 2001 at 5, A. Casero, Open Hole Multi-Stage Completion System in
`Unconventional Plays: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economics, SPE
`164009 (2013); Paper 51, POR at 22.
`
`67
`
`

`

`1998 Halliburton
`publishes Thomson
`1999 Halliburton
`publishes Ellsworth
`
`Lane-Wells
`(Ex. 1002)
`
`1955
`
`1988
`
`1990
`
`1992
`
`1995
`
`1996
`
`1998
`
`1999
`
`2000
`
`2001
`Packers Plus
`performs first
`StackFRAC job;
`68
`Files patent
`
`

`

`1992
`Baker Hughes publishes
`Ex. 2079 (Damgaard)
`Cementation is “prerequisite”
`
`1990
`DOE publishes Ex. 2077
`Cased and cemented
`
`1988
`Halliburton publishes
`Austin (Ex. 2098)
`Cement necessary for
`effective fracturing
`
`Lane-Wells
`(Ex. 1002)
`
`1992
`Halliburton publishes
`Ex. 2099 (Owens)
`Multiple stages must
`be cemented
`
`1995
`Halliburton publishes
`Ex. 2078 (Abass)
`Perforations “crucial”
`
`1996 Yost (DOE) publishes Ex. 2100
`Focused perforations “field proven”
`1998
`Chevron publishes Ex. 2066
`(Emanuele) Analyzes complex
`initiation problems
`1998 Halliburton
`publishes Thomson
`1999 Halliburton
`publishes Ellsworth
`2000
`Ex. 2063 (Crosby)
`published
`Analyzes complex
`initiation problems
`
`1955
`
`1988
`
`1990
`
`1992
`
`1995
`
`1996
`
`1998
`
`1999
`
`2000
`
`2001
`Packers Plus
`performs first
`StackFRAC job;
`69
`Files patent
`
`

`

`1992
`Baker Hughes publishes
`Ex. 2079 (Damgaard)
`Cementation is “prerequisite”
`
`1990
`DOE publishes Ex. 2077
`Cased and cemented
`
`1988
`Halliburton publishes
`Austin (Ex. 2098)
`Cement necessary for
`effective fracturing
`
`Lane-Wells
`(Ex. 1002)
`
`1992
`Halliburton publishes
`Ex. 2099 (Owens)
`Multiple stages must
`be cemented
`
`1995
`Halliburton publishes
`Ex. 2078 (Abass)
`Perforations “crucial”
`
`1996 Yost (DOE) publishes Ex. 2100
`Focused perforations “field proven”
`1998
`Chevron publishes Ex. 2066
`(Emanuele) Analyzes complex
`initiation problems
`1998 Halliburton
`publishes Thomson
`1999 Halliburton
`publishes Ellsworth
`2000
`Ex. 2063 (Crosby)
`published
`Analyzes complex
`initiation problems
`
`1955
`
`1988
`
`1990
`
`1992
`
`1995
`
`1996
`
`1998
`
`1999
`
`2000
`
`2001
`Packers Plus
`performs first
`StackFRAC job;
`70
`Files patent
`
`

`

`A. Daneshy 2007
`Ex. 2014 published
`Still advocating cement
`
`2006
`Packers Plus
`publishes Ex. 2003
`
`2010
`Packers Plus
`receives SPE Meritorious
`Engineering Award
`
`2012
`Packers Plus
`receives Sproule
`Engineering Award
`
`2005
`Schlumberger acquires
`stake in Packers Plus
`
`2009
`Packers Plus named
`E&Y Entrepreneur
`of the Year
`
`2001
`Packers Plus
`performs first
`StackFRAC job;
`Files patent
`
`2003
`2003
`Baker Hughes
`obtains Packers Plus
`tool drawing
`
`2005
`Baker Hughes
`releases
`FracPoint
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2010
`
`2012
`
`2009
`Weatherford
`releases
`Zoneselect
`
`71
`
`

`

`7272
`
`

`

`The POSITA would have been
`aware that there is a
`significant economic risk
`associated with adopting new
`technology and/or methods that
`defy “tried and true”
`technology and/or methods.
`
`Ex. 2050, McGowen Decl. at 24
`Paper 51, POR at 15-17
`
`73
`
`

`

`The P&P approach was the initial lower
`completion methodology that allowed the
`effective deployment of multi-fracture
`treatments in horizontal wells and it is
`difficult to progress from an established,
`standardized and successful technique;
`unless there are significant tangible benefits
`that can be demonstrated via a different
`method.
`
`Ex. 2001 at 5, A. Casero, Open Hole Multi-Stage Completion System in
`Unconventional Plays: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economics, SPE
`164009 (2013)
`
`74
`
`

`

`[A]nother, for example, reason you
`would use cemented liner is
`because your neighbors are using
`cemented liner and you're getting
`a better production and you say,
`“I don't know why they’re doing it
`but they're getting better
`production. I’m going to use what
`they are using.”
`
`Ex. 2016, A. Daneshy Depo. at 26:2-10
`
`75
`
`

`

`Risk aversion was concluded as being a
`significant factor in the observed slow uptake
`of technology in the Upstream Sector of the
`Oil and Gas business.
`Ex. 2093 at 1, V. Rao, Accelerating Technology Acceptance: Hypotheses
`and Remedies for Risk-Averse Behavior in Technology Acceptance, SPE
`98511 (2005)
`
`76
`
`

`

` T srr- nuts-Ho's ‘l:
`
`
`ProductionrrrrMCFGE]
`
`SPE 135335
`
`Comparative Study of Cemented lversus Uncemenled ltrlulti-Stage Fractured
`Wells in the Barnett Shale
`Darrell Lohoefer. GPE. Eagle Iillil 8 Gas. and Daniel J Snyder. SPE. Floelrr Beale. $PE. and Dan-el Themig. SPE.
`Packers Flus Energy Services
`
`:r. n,.-I=r~r.u-....F-9.m -.
`|J'_‘11_-
`rm _.
`'_L:‘-_ :q..w_t'lj
`rem-r amflfi'aledljl pm'nlqnlel 5:: inn-hi Til-(Elfifl jsiegwIncErhrtl-f' --,a¢.- =1”qu r,;r_.
`3. who, w.
`1wllllI-cnn .r-r r. .rrm, Inc-.5“: 2».
`...r-r.;¢r;- -. ”use“.
`I.
`| .mvfircnrwm r .r..
`n. 1._ item JPu-o
`,. co 3.
`:ll_l IMllilI '3'
`(" _"\_|_'(V'I. J mll'lll EIpIN'.
`(IL‘lI [If I 0' .1JIIL'3I
`-II|.
`IL'
`.1 m1 ||_'I Ik'llar'
`I" 01(0
`._
`
`
`
`
`mean El-rlsnr 'er-tflu-oo' Part-us? 0
`3d rm W'I'l .;. rm mu. -.1r-.r. me my mum n‘It-e cram—J
`arm-t." erg-en r,
`IMO-“11¢ new-mar New...” .- fi'l
`
`I501
`-.Ir-;rr- Helm-t1
`rmogmu f1]...-
`.I-ullax-HITreJ-uufirrrn(o1unt1sluq..f r.v|r'w'¢d:ml_ur gaze-“qr.
`
`
`
`
`Abstract
`
`The induslly has made a very quick lunt toward both urIcurrventional reservoirs and horizuntal. IIIuIIi—stage heuuring.
`Some IFIEIIJSle' BMDBIIS have DBQLII‘I III} qu'BSIICII'I 1t'IE.L BllIBClIIleI'IIBSS Ill I'IBCDvaIES I” ”“385 I'I‘I355l‘vB “35$va HSSBIS. Pt
`nrrlable lnrmerien in these discussions has been the Barnett Shale, where e verietv of methe—rls and technnlogies have
`been used to fracture stiIrIulele IIurizunlal wells. In last. much of the learning curve fur csinpletiun practices has some
`Iron-r expenmental work in this lll'lOCIn verrtional plav.
`
`From 20M through 21.106. a new. open hole mutti-slage system [OHM S] oormletion technologyI was run In Denion
`Cnu nit.I Tet-res Using rILIt'IlicaIIv availehle- data [mm the past five years. lhis slurlv cnnlresis long-lerrn rIrnrlucAirrn
`results from DHI'Ir'IS completed wells and wells mrnuleted wilh cemented easing.
`
`The dala sel I'orDHME fractured wells ccrmperecl tn the date set for cemented fractured wells indicales that open thIe
`wells. on average. perlurmed Driller. Significantly. I10 failures (Ir shut-in usrieds 'I'I'Em': observed for the DHMS wells.
`This establishes the viability. rel-attiI-Ir.r and effectiveness otthis technologv for the long-term lite oft-tells not onl'r.r in the
`Barnett. but for performance enhancement in other sh ale pie-gs
`
`Substantial amounts at monev are currentlv be-ng seem to raniolv develop resource mars similar to the Barnett
`worldwide. Based on shutt—turm results usntg current complelluri methods. prudidluns for ultimate recoveries may be
`overeat-mated. This peoer evaluates the erred-veness oi currehl complete-t practrces hrr contrastrng [we methods rn
`rem-ts of nmrluctinn economics. operational efficiency. and hesl I'racturing practices to determine whether Ihe
`mmplctiun method can attest overall wull nerlermancu and long-term recovery.
`
`'mmdmifl"
`Fonnalien Description. The Barnett 5h ale Is_a MIss-ssrppran-age shale Ieeateo rII the Forth 'W'OI'tl'I Basin and covers
`approximatelv 5.0043 square miles {12.9% Irrn }of north-central Texas {Figure l] The Barnett represents the
`grandfather at shale reservoirs where "shale as source rust" was tirst eslaulrslrerJ. and where the necessary set or
`technologres. na mely her'raontal er'rII-rrg and mum-stage fracturing. were developed to make hydrocarbon extract-on
`ecunumicallv leesmle in shale.
`
`.
`5
`
`5
`:
`
`:
`
`I
`
`.. a“ .
`....................................................................................................................................miss...” .
`mil???
`
`mu
`«3+:
`
`_
`
`..
`
`_.
`
`Cumulative
`MMCFGE
`
`Cumulative
`MMCFGE
`
`_
`
`:
`'
`
`24 Mflnth
`
`Cumulative
`MMCFGE
`
`'
`-
`
`Cumulative
`MMCFG E
`
`The Bamett is contem'lrrblv nverIe-n by the Pennsylven re n-arIe Marnie Fells ere stene and uncenforrnablv overlies the
`Ordovician—age Viola LimeslarreEllehtrsrger Group. whlcl‘t serves as a tree barrier [Figure 2’} [Buvrrkt-JI. 2W3: Follastro
`et al.. zero]. The core area of the Barnett :5 located In the Benton. Wise and Tenant Counties where rt rs
`
`annrosirnalelv 3-00-10 SUDtI
`
`thick with purnanvnnd permeabrlil'r vallIES inlhe range of‘lr — 5e. and Cr EICIIJEIT— DIODES
`
`
`Figtlré E ISL]mmaw Elf Cumulative firfldutflifli] date fIDI" DHMS a“a CiffSe't 'Ii'u'BliS in UBI’ttOii County;
`
`Ex. 2018;
`
`Ex. 2018;
`Paper 51,
`
`Paper 51,
`77
`POR 22-23
`POR 22-23
`
`
`
`
`

`

` Ex. 2018;
`
`Ex. 2018;
`Paper 51,
`Paper 51,
`POR 22-23
`POR 22-23
`
`78
`78
`
`

`

`“game-changing technology”
`“prize product”
`(Ex. 2033)
`(Ex. 2004)
`
`“revolutionary
`technology”
`(Ex. 2008)
`
`(Ex. 2048)
`
`“Multistage fracking pioneer…”
`(Ex. 2006)
`
`(Ex. 2048)
`
`(Ex. 2048)
`
`“disruptive technology”
`(Ex. 2046)
`
`“legendary”
`(Ex. 2046)
`
`“… revolutionized the
`completions sector…”
`(Ex. 2006)
`
`“the industry standard”
`(Ex. 2009)
`
`(Ex. 2048)
`
`Paper 51,
`POR 26-31
`
`79
`
`

`

`That focus led to the development of
`a number of completion technologies,
`starting with the StackFRAC system,
`which revolutionized the completions
`sector by introducing multistage
`fracturing systems in horizontal wells,
`credited with unlocking the potential of
`tight and shale oil and natural gas.
`
`Ex. 2006, Leading the Way: Multistage fracking pioneer Packers Plus plays
`major role in cracking the tight oil code, Canadian OilPatch Technology
`Guidebook (2012); Paper 51, POR at 26-31.
`
`80
`
`

`

`
`
`81
`
`EN [HEP‘R EN'JTUH OF THE YEAR
`NMIOML WINNER
`
`
`
`
`
`Packers Plus
`_Energy 5th-
` $1" ND. BF EMPLOYEES IN 2000: 3
` FPM: “'Ihy (“ti J‘U
`l-V',” N'L-‘ARYEQUU. Dali-Elwin“. Kun i’almmnd Pficl Kn]:-
`I'm-1:. Tuatarl unr-
`um shanfiuncd flu: net'unlg.
`l'VrfIJEIT pcilk a: IJll-xn-itt'b air" Hal-
`
`
`THEMIG: \l'
`'
`.g
`h'lmmln I-:I .slarr Ih¢ir HUI-.1 firrlt.
`I'lasod in Fall‘ifllry: Fag-kn; Plus
`3* EDGE: ABDUT 35C!
`vanrpgm. My”, |_
`-_
`Energv Send-m 1rIL- aim-d -'.u help dm :‘mium-ry wall: d:c monu-
`
`
`<I1Ialch «acupun-
`H".hal'dust-m-Icaul:d:|~d>edl.s.1p'u'hmn :l‘mltrman 'Ii-mn lwuwnn-rl
`
`
`IJIu .l|l‘u|.illl mrl: me. <I1r|| challu'ngr- in Z‘Jfll. TJu-anlg
`"ml his. 1:'n.1r nn 2 flight tn :1 rnl-l-Linp, 1n slulcll ml; the
`
`Fifi—(IF NFL-DYE '-_‘
`alt: Fm‘ wlm 1mm ibcL‘fllm.
`l‘aL-lccrx'
`.‘s'mzL-I-‘uc spun”.
`
`
`3013‘} ABOUT 3'50
`'I'I'n' LcLiInnlupy ullisrlu pmvirlmlll unl'isillc Jul"
`:35
`
`- In; mun: mm;
`
`
`Illilxill linllg rlmdllrnt‘al in .TllTlll'e‘. nil1|Q|c|§ :Ind LIRIIL nch'
`
`LDC
`
`I?
`Flimi
`Ftlz'msmons. New. With the help 0! : wane:
`"ml-na—
`EIIJi'Eu
`”N: IV FCC-9 ZS
`
`
`
`HW'ISIJ Uiillc‘ld giant .‘iLhEIulllclyc
`:"lmrs w '11:“ny
`
`Iurl'l
`
`Ijjl
`”urn-tn. Hunt. [n.ImJ
`Csjl.
`:I:Ir| pn-u'.
`
`
`Wm Pmmv-Fhs [EI'JI'IL- ..
`(Itnl D n The“. .' «burn the stun:
`
`
`Phi HEM-EH =0"ka 'PA'I
`
`
`FINANCIM. POST ”WEE: “’har draw mu Ln :2” HI-
`III'JILI
`I; JCIJ Inn-
`aml gas mil-Hwy? Yuu'n: :I farm Girl Elam muchum mi.
`
`
`Um.- II' 9505'. :0 G) LXI
`HM — ll-J. muLI}-c-ilmu:1u-y.
`
`
`
`3*“ THEMIEL: Mg.- d'Ml u‘anmE fur L'rmglk Igipulin:
`
`
`davimln.
`II‘JL' rm! Il'l explrlratlnn.
`| éidn‘: hum.- mun-E1
`JEIr-IzL 5-1:.- oiHn-r-g» husuLm mail
`I prafluah-rl with u mul
` wrlnt you to (In a _
`
`
`With Packera Plus techrmlflgy.
`1}dlwiiu‘l‘ill|1llfill‘|
`mgiIIMHI-‘lg ulu'fimr I'mn- I'm 1.'I-.i\.u-rs¢ir-’.- nflliimm and 93.1 a ivE:
`
`FF“: “4-1:“ wrmt
`aL HaJlibufi-mn. T clan-Std up In 'liniux fill: 'FcIuI' ytnl's. Llltn 1 uIEnI
`
`THEMED: 'l'no whr.
`my wag.- :i|'.|1'\ Iming rainfall-:1 l::- {'hlladla. I lm'u Lu MKM'IJIJIITL
`
`na-a mmpemcs '
`:Iri: rl‘imh :"HI nt'l:i'.e-.w:|!eT-i.':1_rrll.'. 5:an rl1ryjusr drum Ian-rt: mun;-
`the Bakken Gilfierd went frc-m
`
`mowmim in 'beas- Aim: flH (J'rnadian $1111:le m. limm'n for
`u‘nl‘l nu) 5311. ulup'i
`
`n12u!t|uur|t.Tnn'rE
`1U>1=Ii1lg mail] Ltunpanitt and: ll'.l2|.
`nlirzm. ficxm'nnrr nntt lul‘i
`urnh Km m i" u
`
`rm: that s: all ”Eran-J15.“ ulrlfierenr: in 1'-
`npv. TJ'.1: find Ihmg
`wu- EU 'IJ-Jik] LIIieH
`pmducing 100 barre-IE. 01‘ DH 3
`
`n rlmrnrerl said was. "ii The tcchnnlogr 3:11 3mm In Lianada u.-
`
`.an‘rc‘iy. i1}. lrrr‘JlJIIblr IILIl “filth liliing about."
`ldmufllu: we bu! : -_|
`
`lxuwmw Mr .Tmmn Fa
`
`day in EDDIE ta 50.000 now.
`
`
`37' NO. OF OPERhTiNG
`
`LDCATJDHS JN EDDIE: 1
`
`T‘ LDCATIDNS IN 2E1 09: 25
`
`'
`
`41""."JIInicmuI r. :Im
`
`Exlfibit 200?
`IPREfl 16-00598
`
`
`
`

`

`StackFRAC, the company’s prize
`product and primary innovation, is
`an open hole ball drop completion
`system that’s widely credited with
`unlocking old resource plays that
`were thought to be too expensive or
`to technically challenging to tap.
`
`Ex. 2005, Exploration and Development, Alberta Oil Magazine;
`Paper 51, POR at 26-31.
`
`82
`
`

`

`With the objectives of making multi stage
`horizontal well fracturing more efficient,
`both in terms of cost and time, the first
`commercial OHMS systems were
`developed and deployed in 2001 (Snyder
`2011).
`
`Ex. 2014 at 5, A. Casero, Open Hole Multi-Stage Completion System in
`Unconventional Plays: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economics, SPE 164009
`(2013); Paper 51, POR at 26-31.
`
`83
`
`

`

`Currently, there are a number of commercial
`OHMS systems to choose from, but for the
`most part, these systems utilize similar
`principles.
`
`Ex. 2014 at 4, A. Casero, Open Hole Multi-Stage Completion System in
`Unconventional Plays: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economics, SPE
`164009 (2013); Paper 51, POR at 26-31.
`
`84
`
`

`

`GeckT-HS Plus ®
`
`DO IT ONCE. DO IT RIGHT.
`
`' _'—
`"3-"? "'
`=IJIL Illuniimlll
`____
`__ ”-9—:
`Exs. 2004; 2018; 2053; 2056; 2057; 2058 (video); 2061 (video)
`
`058 (video); 2061 (video)
`
`Exs. 2019; 2020; 2052; 2059 (video)
`Exs. 2019; 2020; 2052,- 2059 (video)
`
`85
`85
`
`

`

`Q. Are you familiar with Baker
`Hughes’ Fracpoint system?
`A. Ditto what I told you about
`Packers Plus relative to Baker
`Hughes.
`Q. That’s another open-hole ball-
`drop system, right?
`A. Yes. It’s open.
`
`Ex. 2017, A. Daneshy Depo. at 96:1-5
`
`86
`
`

`

`lsqFrac - Generation 1
`
`. Generation 1
`
`Market Drivers & Opportunities
`
`r Cempetitiqn:
`— Packers Plus
`
`- Preven System
`I Opportunities
`Mid Gen
`
`EX. 2052 at 25-26
`
`— System Status {Testing and
`- Packer
`- Design Requirement: ~ H‘
`in. qpen hqie
`i P'
`Testing Results _!
`able in eehreveWfiDUl-‘isl
`- Free Sleeve
`. Design Requirements — Hi
`. Elell Tflfiim 11mg Line an:
`I Equipment DEHVW
`- Stelus of Equipment
`
`I Generatien 1 end Generatien 2
`* E 1J4. OPE” HOLE, EWPSI. 5251:":
`— MALT
`
`.. System Issues
`
`- Genermiqn 3
`
`r 6 W Open Hele. WIIIJPSI, E. INSF
`
`fit: lilies-{Ends
`
`Hi!
`In: MINT-d;
`
`Ex. 2052 at 25-26
`87
`
`

`

`(FE-chars Plus
`
`
`' -
`
`I-
`
`Fin ill In 513 IlatiDrl
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket