throbber
m
`©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc
`
`.
`MARCEL DEKKER, INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - NEW YORK, NY 10016
`
`K
`
`Tablet Press Instrumentation
`
`Michael Levin
`
`Metropolitan Computing Corporation, East Hanover, New lerse}/, U.$.A.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`This article is designed to facilitate the understanding of
`the general principles of tablet press instrumentation and
`the benefits thereof by the fonnulators, process engineers.
`validation specialists, and quality assurance personnel, as
`well as production floor supervisors who would like to
`understand the basic standards and techniques of getting
`information about their tableting process.
`
`HISTORY OF TABLET PRESS
`INSTRUMENTATION
`
`In 1952 1954 Higuchi and his groupm have instrumented
`upper and lower compression, ejection. and punch
`displacement on an eccentric tablet press. and pioneered
`the modern study of compaction process. This work was
`followed by Nelsonlml who was the member of the
`original group.
`In 1966. a U.S. patent was granted to Knoechel and co
`workersm for force measurement on a tablet press. This
`patent was followed by two seminal articles in Journal
`of Pharmaceutical Sciences on the practical applications
`of instrumented rotary tablet machines.[5‘6] A number of
`other patents related to press instrumentation and control
`followed from 1973 on ward.” '5'
`Despite the availability of published designs for
`instrumenting rotary presses. much of the early work on
`compaction properties of materials was done on instru
`merited single punch eccentric presses primarily, due to
`the relative ease of sensor
`installation. as well as
`
`availability of punch displacement measurement.“ '8'
`In mid 1980s, custom made press monitoring systems
`were described.“9‘2°] and the first commercial instrumen
`tation packages became available.
`including both the
`systems for product development and press control. The
`first personal computer based tablet press monitor was
`sold in 1987. and the first Microsoft Windows based press
`instrumentation package in 1995.
`A new era of compaction research has begun with the
`introduction of an instrumented compaction simulatorlz”
`
`E‘Jrc_vcI0pediu afPhurmaceu1icuI Technulrrgy
`DOI: 10.1081/E-EPT l200l2030
`Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dckker, Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`in 1976. while a compaction simulator patent was issued
`as recently as l996.m]
`A new generation of “compaction simulators” was born
`when a mechanical press replicator was patented in the
`year 200O.[23]
`the early stages of press
`A good exposé of
`instrumentation and resulting research is presented in
`review articles by Schwartzfm Marshall,[25' and Jones.[26]
`A comprehensive review can be found in a relatively
`recent paper by Celik and Rueggenml
`For other historical
`infonnation on the press instru
`mentation. the reader is encouraged to peruse Ridgeway
`Watt’s[28] volume. There have been a number of papers
`published on various disparate instrumentation topics. and
`in a recent volume by Mufios Ruiz and Vromans,[29’ there
`are two good articles on the subject
`but, unfortunately,
`they deal with marginal issues of single station press and
`instrumented punch only.
`
`DATA ACQUISITION PRINCIPLES:
`FROM TRANSDUCERS TO COMPUTERS
`
`To monitor and control a tablet press. certain sensors must
`be installed at specific locations on the machine. These
`sensors are called transducers. In general. a transducer is
`a device that converts energy from one form to another
`(e.g.. force to voltage). Tablet press transducers typically
`measure applied force. turret speed, or punch position.
`Because the signals coming from such transducers are
`normally in millivolts, they need to be amplified and then
`converted to digital form in order to be processed by a data
`acquisition system.
`
`Piezoelectric Gages
`
`Historically, high impedance piezoelectric transducers
`that employ quartz crystals were used in early stages of
`press instrumentation. When subject to stress. the crystal
`accumulates electrostatic charge that is directly propor
`tional to the applied force. Both low and (more modern)
`high impedance piezoelectric gages have high frequency
`response, but may exhibit signal drifting due to charge
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 26
`
`Grunenthal GmbH Exhibit 2039
`
`Rosellini v. Grunenthal GmbH
`
`IPR2016—00471
`
`

`
`Q-5 MARCEL DEKKER, INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - NEW YORK, NY 10016
`
`©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form unthout the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`2
`
`Tablet Press Instrumentation
`
`leakage (approximately 0.04% decay per second can be
`seen in modern piezoelectric transducers). Nowadays,
`the preferred way of instrumenting tablet presses is with
`strain gages.
`
`Strain Gages
`
`Strain gages are foil, wire, or semiconductor devices that
`convert pressure or force into electrical voltage. When a
`stress is applied to a thin wire.
`it becomes longer and
`thinner. Both factors contribute to increased electrical
`
`resistance. If an electrical current is sent through this wire.
`it will be affected by the changes in the resistance of the
`conduit. This principle is used in strain gage—based
`transducers. Foil gages. known for robust application
`range, useful nominal resistance, and reliable sensitivity
`control. are most commonly used for instrumentation of
`compression. precompression, and ejection forces. Semi-
`conductor-based strain gages are inherently more sensitive
`but suffer from high electrical noise and temperature
`sensitivity. Such gages are not commonly used in tablet
`press instrumentation except for measurement of die—wall
`pressure and take—off forces.
`
`Wheatstone Bridge
`
`l) is a special arrangement of
`Wheatstone bridge (Fig.
`strain gages that is used to ensure signal balancing. The
`“full" bridge is composed of two pairs of resistors in a
`circle, with two parallel branches used for input and two
`for signal output. By applying the so—called excitation
`voltage (typically, 10V DC) to the bridge input and
`changing the resistance of different “legs” of the bridge by
`adding special resistors. we can make sure that there is a
`zero output voltage when no load is applied to the
`transducer. This is called zero balance. Once the bridge is
`
` Screw _....—-—-V
`
`terminals
`
`T’
`
`1 A typical Wheatstone bridge arrangement of strain
`Fig.
`gages.
`
`Page 2 of 26
`
`balanced. a small perturbation in the resistance of any
`“leg” of the bridge results in a nonzero signal output.
`The output of the Wheatstone bridge is nonnally
`expressed in millivolts per volt of excitation per unit of
`applied force. For example. sensitivity of 0.2 mV/V/kN
`means that applying. say. l0kN force and 10V excitation
`will produce 20mV output. To utilize such output.
`it
`usually needs to be amplified several hundred times to
`reach units of volts.
`
`Another important function of the bridge is balancing
`of temperature effects. Although individual strain gages
`are sensitive to temperature fluctuations. Wheatstone
`bridge arrangement provides for temperature sensitivity
`compensation.
`so that
`the resulting transducer
`is no
`longer changing its output to any significant degree when
`it heats up.
`Because the output of these bridges is in the range of
`millivolts,
`the cables utilized to carry the signal are
`normally shielded with a braided or foil-lined sheath
`around individual wires. The shield. as a rule. is connected
`
`to the amplifier. but never touches the actual instrumented
`equipment (i.e.. tablet press). If this rule is violated. a
`ground loop may generate electrical noise and present a
`dangerous electrical shock hazard.
`
`Gage Factor
`
`The gage factor is a specific characteristic of a strain gage.
`It is calculated as the change in resistance relative to unit
`strain that has caused this change. Strain gages that are
`commonly used for tablet press instrumentation are made
`from copper nickel alloy and have a gage factor of about
`2.
`In a typical bending beam application (such as
`compression roll
`transducer), one side of the beam
`experiences tension while the other side undergoes
`compression. By mounting two gages on each side,
`the
`sensitivity of the transducer can be doubled.
`Strain gages have to be bonded to areas of machine
`parts that are most sensitive to applied force. Such areas
`can be identified with the use of polarized light technique
`that “points out” the stress distribution.
`
`Manufacturing a Force Transducer
`
`instrumentation designs are proprietary and
`Usually,
`specific detail drawings are held in fiducial capacity.
`Each force transducer is custom designed for a particular
`machine part. Overall specifications are taken from the
`actual party and/or manufacturer approved drawings.
`Duplicate steel members. such as pins and cams, are
`normally made from A2 tool steel
`in a fully annealed
`
`

`
` ) MARCEL Darooza. INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - New YORK. NY 10016
`
`©2002 Marcel Delrker, Inc. All rights reserved This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc
`
`Table! Press Instrumentation
`
`3
`
`(softened) state. Original machine parts are first annealed.
`if required. The member is then machined. hardened to
`Rockwell 60 64. tested, and finally. ground to specified
`dimensions.
`
`is highly advantageous to determine stress dis-
`It
`tribution using polarized light beams identifying the areas
`of maximum strain yet avoiding areas of uneven strain.
`A typical procedure of transducer manufacturing in a
`professional gaging lab might be as follows. Foil
`type
`strain gages are bonded to the steel member utilizing a
`high-performance 100% solid epoxy system adhesive
`under controlled heating rate conditions. After intrabridge
`wiring is completed using solid conductor wiring (to
`prevent electrical noise). multistrand wire cabling with a
`combination of foil and braided insulation is connected to
`
`the bridge. Wire anchoring is achieved utilizing epoxy
`adhesive and protected with a combination of latex-based
`adhesives and/or epoxy resins. Lead wire cabling is
`protected by Teflon outer shield. as well as inner braided
`wire shield. The Teflon to steel joint is sealed with epoxy
`but should not be subject to stresses that would cause the
`cable to kink or yield in such a way as to expose the inner
`braided wire shield. Protective coatings are then applied
`and final postcure heating is performed for at least 2hr at
`a temperature approximately 50°C above the transducer
`normal operating temperature (approximately 175 or
`I05 °C). A silicon-based adhesive. such as RTV. is used to
`
`lzuge cavities while maintaining a low modulus of
`fill
`elasticity. preventing undue infiuence upon the actual
`strain measurement. The coating is resilient to moderate
`mechanical abrasion. as well as most solvents. oils.
`
`intended for protection against
`is not
`It
`cleaners. etc.
`penetrating sharp objects.
`A high—quality connector is then attached to the cable.
`The next step is to perform offset zeroing with fixed.
`l‘7c
`precision. low-temperature coefficient resistors. followed
`by NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technol-
`ogy) traceable calibration.
`It is worth noting that, in general. the duplicate members
`are not made of corrosion-resistant steel. because high
`tensile strength and ability to be easily machined are
`required. Prior to storage.
`the surface should be treated
`like any high—grade tablet press punch steel will be treated:
`a thin coating of oil should be used after wiping with
`alcohol.
`
`Load Cells
`
`In some cases, where appropriate. a load cell can be used
`in place of bonded strain gages.
`A load cell is a strain gage bridge in an enclosure
`forming a complete transducer device.
`
`Page 3 of 26
`
`it produces an
`Like any properly made transducer.
`output signal proportional
`to the applied load. Unlike
`custom-made transducers that require application of strain
`gages directly to press parts, load cells are self-contained
`and can be placed on a press in specially machined cavities
`to be easily replaced or serviced. As a drawback. load cells
`generally are less sensitive or less suited to measure the
`absolute force than custom-made strain gage transducers.
`Load cells can be used on punch holders in a single station
`press. Another example of load cell use is a die assembly
`for calibration of existing traducers on a press.
`
`Linear Variable Differential Transformer
`
`Linear variable differential transfonner (LVDT. Fig. 2) is
`a device that produces voltage proportional to the position
`of a core rod inside a cylinder body.
`It measures
`displacement or a position of an object relative to some
`predefined zero location. On tablet presses. LVDTs are
`used to measure punch displacement and in—die thickness.
`They generally have very high precision and accuracy. but
`there are numerous practical concerns regarding improper
`mounting or maintenance of such transducers on tablet
`presses.
`
`Proximity Switch
`
`Proximity switch (Fig. 3) is a noncontact electromagnetic
`pickup device that senses the presence of metal. On tablet
`presses. it is widely used to detect the beginning of a turret
`
`
`
`Fig. 2 Linear variable differential transfonner (LVDT).
`
`

`
` 5 MARCEL DEKKER. INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - New YORK. NY more
`
`via
`
`©2002 Marcel Deldrer, Inc. All rights reserved This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express Written permission of Marcel Dekker. Inc
`
`4
`
`Tablet Press Instrumentation
`
`
`
`Fig. 3 Proximity switch.
`
`to identify stations and to facilitate peak
`revolution.
`detection in tablet force control applications.
`
`Instrumentation Amplifier and Signal
`Conditioning
`
`Signal conditioning involves primarily an amplifier that
`provides the excitation voltage. as well as gain (a factor
`used in convening millivolt output of the strain gage
`bridge to the volt-based range of the input of the data
`acquisition device).
`from other
`is different
`Instrumentation amplifier
`types of amplifiers in that the signal from each side of
`the transducer bridge is amplified separately and then
`the difference between the two amplified signals is,
`in
`tum. amplified. As a result. noise from both sides of the
`sensors is reduced.
`
`filter
`also offer
`instrumentation amplifiers
`Some
`functionality. A filter circuit combines resistors and
`capacitors that act to block the undesirable frequencies.
`It
`is a fact. however.
`that a good transducer should
`provide a clean signal. Use of analog or digital filters
`may cause the loss of some important portions of the
`signal
`that one is attempting to measure. Frequency
`filters may cause the measured compression force peak.
`for example.
`to be skewed toward the trailing edge of
`the peak and can yield a lower than actual peak force.
`Because
`filters distort
`the signal.
`they must be
`avoided unless absolutely necessary.
`In many cases,
`better electronics may make filter use obsolete. For
`example.
`the so—called antialiasing filter that is used to
`condition a high—frequency signal for a slow sampling
`rate
`is generally not
`required for
`tablet press
`applications
`if modem fast
`speed data acquisition
`devices are used for signal processing.
`In addition to amplification, excitation. and filtering.
`signal—conditioning devices may provide isolation. voltage
`division.
`surge protection.
`and current—to—voltage
`conversion.
`
`Instrumentation Terms: Definitions
`
`Several important terms may be now defined with respect
`to transducers and signal conditioning:
`
`a
`
`interval over which a
`Full Scale (F5): The total
`transducer is intended to operate. Also. it can define
`the output from transducer when the maximum load is
`applied.
`a Excitation: The voltage applied to the input terminals
`of a strain gage bridge.
`a Accuracy: The closeness with which a measurement
`approaches
`the true value of a variable being
`measured. lt defines the error of reading. Good tablet
`press transducers have at least 1% accuracy ( with this
`level of accuracy. for example. a compression force
`transducer with 50 RN FS will produce at most an error
`of SOON).
`
`o
`
`Precision: Reproducibility of a measurement, i.e., how
`much successive readings of the same fixed value of a
`variable differ from one another. If a person is shooting
`darts. for example. the accuracy is determined by how
`close to the bull's eye the darts have landed. while the
`precision will be indicated by how close the darts are
`to each other.
`
`o Resolution: The smallest change in measured value
`that the instrument can detect.
`
`o Dynamic range of a transducer: The difference
`between the maximal FS level and the lowest
`
`it
`(dB),
`detectable signal. Measured in decibels
`indicates the ratio of signal maximum to minimum
`levels:
`
`Some press sensors may have a rather narrow dynamic
`range not necessarily correlated with accuracy. For
`example, a very accurate compression roll pin designed
`to measure S0kN force may not detect 5 kN signal.
`o Calibration: Comparison of transducer outputs at
`standard test loads to output of a known standzud at the
`same load levels. A line representing the best fit to data
`is called a calibration graph.
`o Calibration factor: A load value in engineering units
`that a transducer will indicate for each volt of output.
`after amplifier gain and balance. Calibration factor is
`usually expressed in relation to FS.
`Shunt calibration: A procedure of transducer testing
`when a resistor with a known value is connected to one
`
`0
`
`leg of the bridge. The output should correspond to the
`voltage specified in the calibration certificate. If it does
`not. something is wrong and the transducer needs to be
`inspected for possible damage or recalibrated.
`
`Page 4 of 26
`
`

`
`Q-5 MARCEL DEKKER, INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - NEW YORK, NY 10016
`
`©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form unthout the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Tablet Press Instrumentation
`
`5
`
`0
`
`o
`
`Sensitivity: The ratio of a change in measurement
`value to a change in measured variable. For example, if
`a person ate a I lb steak and the bathroom scale shows
`2 lb increase in the body weight, then the scale can be
`called as insensitive (ratio is far from unity).
`Traceability: The step-by-step transfer process by
`which the transducer calibration can be related to
`
`primary standards. During any calibration process,
`transducer is compared to a known standard. National
`or
`international
`institutions usually prescribe the
`standards. In the United States, such governing body
`is the NIST.
`
`o Measurement errors: Any discrepancies between the
`measured values and the reported results over the
`entire FS. Such errors include, but are not limited to:
`
`o Nonlinearity: The maximum deviation of the
`calibration points from a regression line (best fit
`to the data), expressed as a percentage of the rated
`FS output and measured on increasing load only.
`o Repeatability: The maximum difference between
`transducer output readings for repeated applied
`loads under identical loading and environmental
`conditions. It indicates the ability of an instru-
`ment
`to give identical
`results
`in successive
`readings.
`o Hysteresis: The maximum difference between
`transducer output readings for the same applied
`load. One reading is obtained by increasing the
`load from zero and the other reading is obtained
`by decreasing the load from the rated FS load.
`Measurements should be taken as rapidly as
`possible to minimize creep.
`0 Return to zero: The difference in two readings:
`one, at no load, and the second one, after the FS
`
`load was applied and removed.
`
`A good transducer is one with the combined (or
`maximum) error of less than I% of the FS.
`
`Analog-to-Digital Converters
`
`from a
`(in volts)
`In order to convey analog output
`transducer to a computer, it has to be converted into a
`sequence of binary digital numbers. Modern analog-to-
`digital converter (ADC) boards are sophisticated high-
`speed electronic devices that are classified by the input
`resolution, as well as the range of input voltages and
`sampling rates.
`Resolution of an ADC board is measured in bits.
`
`is 55
`Bit (abbreviation for binary unit) is a unit of information
`equal to one binary decision (such as “yes or no,
`on or
`
`off’). A I2-bit system provides a resolution of one part in
`2'2
`4096, or approximately 0.025% of FS. Likewise, I6
`bits correspond to one part
`in 216
`65,536, or
`approximately 0.00l5% of FS (for tablet press appli-
`cations, such resolution is usually excessive).
`Thus, resolution of ADC board limits not only the
`dynamic range but also the overall system accuracy.
`Altematively, a higher resolution may be required to retain
`a certain level of accuracy within a given dynamic range.
`For example, a 0.5% accurate transducer with 80dB
`dynamic range requires at least I2-bit ADC resolution.
`Amplifying a low-level signal by 10 or 100 times
`increases the effective resolution by more than 3 and 6 bits,
`respectively. On the other hand,
`increasing an ADC
`resolution cannot benefit the overall system accuracy if
`other components, such as amplifier or transducer, have a
`lower resolution.
`
`When an input signal change is smaller than the
`system’s minimum resolution,
`then that event will go
`undetected. For example, for an FS of IO V (corresponding
`to, say, a compression transducer output of 50 kN), using a
`12-bit ADC, any signal that does not exceed 2.44 mV
`(12.2 N) will not be seen by the system.
`The ADC boards also differ by the effective sampling
`rate range. Sampling rate speed is measured in Hertz
`(times per second). The signals coming from a tablet press
`have a frequency of not more that l00Hz (compression
`events per second). To avoid aliasing (losing resolution of
`the incoming signal due to slow sampling rate),
`the
`sampling rate should be at
`least
`twice the highest
`frequency of the signal. Most ADC boards used for data
`collection in tableting applications have a sampling rate of
`5 20 times larger than signal frequency. That
`is why
`antialiasing filters are not required.
`
`Computers and Data Acquisition Software
`
`Overall accuracy of a data acquisition system is
`determined by the worst—case error of all its components.
`One should be aware of the fact that most system errors
`come neither from transducers (0.5% 1% accuracy) nor
`from A/D converters (0.025% accuracy) but from the
`software analyzing the data (round—off errors, improper
`sampling rate, or algorithms).
`The speed and capacity of a data acquisition system
`depend on the computer’s processor and hand drive
`specifications. The real—time data from transducers is
`streamlined to both the screen (for monitoring) and the
`disk (for replay and analysis). Generally speaking, “real-
`time” processing means reporting any change in the
`phenomena under study as it happens. Interestingly, but
`
`Page 5 of 26
`
`

`
`§ MARCEL DEKKER. INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - New YORK. NY more
`
`191
`
`©2002 Marcel Delrker, Inc. All rights reserved This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written pernnssion of Marcel Dekker. Inc
`
`6
`
`Tablet Fl'L“39 Instrumentation
`
`a high-speed data collection from a tablet press and a
`bookkeeping home finance program used on a monthly
`basis to balance the checkbook can both be related to as
`“real-time" software. The difference is in the time frames.
`
`For a tablet press. we are collecting data that need to be
`sampled and processed in milliseconds
`(a typical
`compression event may take 25 msec). while for home
`bookkeeping once a month will do.
`Most vendors supplying transducers, signal condition-
`ing. and computer hardware adhere to practical standards.
`e.g.. there are some accepted norms for strain gage factors,
`combined errors, sensitivity. ADC resolution. and
`sampling rate. The difference between vendors is apparent
`when we compare software because there are no
`universally established standards of user interface. Yet
`the hardware is “transparent" (i.e..
`invisible) to the end
`user
`day in tuid day out the user is facing the screen.
`keyboard. and mouse. The ease of software use. bug-free
`analysis of signals coming from transducers, reliability of
`statistical computations. quality of graphs and reports. and
`validatability of the system all of the above contrfloute to
`the quality of the data acquisition software.
`Proper validation tests of a data acquisition system
`should include calculation of an overall system error when
`the input is known and controlled (eg. an NIST traceable
`signal generator providing a sinusoidal signal with a
`known amplitude and frequency, to simulate compression
`events on a press). Comparing the output (for example.
`peak heights as reported by the software) to the known
`input. the overall system error can be reliably established.
`
`TABLET PRESS INSTRUMENTATION FOR
`PRODUCT AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT
`
`R&D Grade Instrumentation
`
`In a production environment, typical tablet weight control
`mechanism is driven by signals that are coming from a
`compression force transducer. Strain gages may be
`installed on a column connecting the upper and lower
`compression wheel assemblies. This transducer measures
`what is generally known as “main compression." i.e.. a
`diluted average of the forces acting on the upper and lower
`punches. Altematively. a load cell may be positioned in
`some convenient
`location to register a transmitted
`compression force.
`It
`is measured away from the force
`application axis. and some force is lost in the transmission.
`The resulting measurement may be adequate for tablet
`weight control. but. even if properly calibrated. it does not
`represent the absolute value of the compression force.
`
`The R&D grade instrumentation, in contrast. requires
`placing the strain gages as close to the punch tips as
`possible in a vertical alignment with the direction of force
`application.l3°l in practice. it means placing the gages in a
`compression roll pin. so that the resulting measurement
`would reflect the absolute force. Thus. we can differentiate
`
`between the force on the upper and lower punch, and
`moreover. we can compare readings of the compression
`force from different tablet presses.
`
`Compression Force Measurement
`
`On a typical R&D grade compression transducer. a
`compression roll pin is machined with incisions made for
`placing strain gages (Fig. 4). The actual form of these
`cavities constitutes the very art of the transducer design
`that is usually proprietary and is based on the know-how of
`instrumentation vendor.
`
`It hast to be noted that there could be an upper or lower
`instrumented compression roll pin.
`The resulting measurement of a compression force is
`highly correlated with a variety of tablet properties. As
`compression increases. so does tablet hardness and weight
`(at constant thickness and true density). along with a force
`required to eject a tablet. Many variables affect the force
`of compression: press settings. press speed. punch length
`variation. punch wear. and damage.
`formulation and
`excipient pmperties.
`
`Precompression Force Measurement
`
`Similar to instrumented compression pin, there is a way
`to instrument an upper or lower instrumented preCom—
`pression mll pin. Precompression, if it exists on a press.
`is used for de-aerating and initial tamping of the powder
`mass in the die and usually helps to achieve the desired
`hardness without capping or lamination.l3°‘3” The force
`
`
`
`Fig. 4 Compression force transducer.
`
`Page 6 of 26
`
`

`
`§ MARCEL DEKKER, INC. 0 270 MADISON AVENUE - NEW YORK, NY 10016
`
`©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express wtitzur permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc
`
`Tablet Press Instrumentation
`
`7
`
`of precompression is normally a
`compression force.
`
`fraction of
`
`the
`
`Ejection Force Measurement
`
`There are many ways to instrument an ejection cam.
`A preferred zurangement of strain gages (the so-called
`“shear force" design) does not require any discontinuities
`in the cam surface, and, most importantly, it provides for a
`very good linearity of the resulting signal (Fig. 5).
`Larger ejection forces may lead to an increased wear on
`tooling and eject cam surface. Ejection force may also be
`used to evaluate the effectiveness of lubrication (of both
`
`the press and the product) and punch sticking. Sensitivity
`and linearity of an ejection transducer are design
`dependent: shear force designs are always preferable
`over split cam or cantilevered beam designs.
`
`Take-Off Force Measurement
`
`Take—off force is monitored by mounting a strain gage to a
`cantilever beam on a press feed frame (in front of the take-
`off blade, Fig. 6). It is done to measure adhesion of tablets
`to lower punch face. Such adhesion is indicative of
`underlubricated granulation, poor tooling face design, die-
`wall binding, and tablet capping.[32'33l
`
`Speed Measurement and Station ID
`Determination
`
`Station identification and press speed are usually obtained
`by means of a revolution counter (proximity switch). It is
`installed on the press in order to mark the beginning of
`a turret revolution and thus enable station identification
`
`and speed calculations by system software.
`In addition, a linear arrangement of proximity switches
`can mark the beginning and end of a compression event
`
`
`
`Fig. 5
`
`Instrumented ejection cam.
`
`
`
`Fig. 6
`
`lnstrumented take off bar.
`
`(information that is vital for tablet weight controllers) and
`also indicate missing punches.
`Other points of instrumentation on a tablet press rue as
`follows:
`
`a
`
`a A rotary press pull-up cam can be instrumented to
`measure the upper punch pull-up force (the force
`required to pull up the upper punch from the die).
`Likewise,
`the
`lower punch pull-down force is
`measured on a bolt holding the pull-down camm] It
`is useful
`in determining the smoothness of press
`operation (extent of lubrication. cleanliness of the
`machine, and long batch fatigue buildup).
`Punch displacement measurements are easily done on
`a single station press by attaching LVDT to the punch.
`On a rotary press. such measurements can be done by
`means of slip ring. telemetry. or instrumented punch.
`Punch displacement profiles may be used in conj-
`unction with compression force to estimate work of
`compression and work of expansion (measure of
`elasticity). Because capping tendency increases with
`the punch penetration depth,
`it may be desirable to
`monitor actual punch movement
`into the die. The
`shape of a force displacement curve is an indication
`of the relative elasticity or plasticity of the material;
`whereas plastic deformation is desirable for stronger
`tablets, excess plasticity usually results in tablets that
`tend to cap and larninate.”5'37'
`o Radial and axial die—wall force measurements also
`
`provide an insight into the compaction mechanism of
`the material and may indicate a die—wall binding
`(sticking) that is,
`in effect, a negative pull on lower
`punch. The radial die—wall pressure due to friction is
`material—specific and is more evenly distributed inside
`the die with an addition of a lubricant.'3""""
`
`Instrumentation of the die presents a technological
`challenge because pressure is distributed nonlinearly
`
`Page 7 of 26
`
`

`
`©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form unthout the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Q-5 MARCEL DEKKER, INC. - 270 MADISON AVENUE - NEW YORK, NY 10016
`
`8
`
`o
`
`to tablet position inside the die and
`with respect
`depends on tablet thickness."‘5'46'
`In-die temperature can be monitored for heat-sensitive
`fomrulation, such as ibuprofen.[47’48'
`
`Instrumented Punch
`
`Several vendors offer instrumented punch, i.e., a punch
`that has strain gages and other instrumentation built-in.
`The data are then accumulated or transmitted via telemetry
`to a stationary computer. Such devices are versatile
`enough to report compression forces and either punch
`displacement or acceleration, and, at least in theory, they
`can be easily moved from press to press.[49’5°] However,
`one should keep in mind that each instrumented punch is
`limited to one size and shape of the tooling, and is limited
`to one station, compared to roll pin instrumentation that
`reports data for all stations and any tooling. In addition,
`instrumented punches are either rather cumbersome to
`install, or else they report a useless measurement of punch
`acceleration instead of punch displacement. Attempts to
`calculate displacement from acceleration so far could not
`be validated.
`
`Single Punch Press for Ft&D
`
`Single punch eccentric presses are often used in early
`stages of formulation development because they do not
`require a large amount of powder. Another benefit is that
`they allow relatively inexpensive measurements of die
`forces and punch displacement (there is no rotation of die
`table and therefore no need to use expensive telemetry
`methods). This is the primary reason why so much basic
`research and product deve

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket