throbber
FULL PAPER
`
`British Journal of Cancer (2014) 111, 2248–2253 | doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`Keywords: castration-resistant prostate cancer; prednisolone; glucocorticoid receptor; steroid switch; abiraterone;
`hormone therapy; dexamethasone; androgen receptor
`
`Tumour responses following a steroid switch
`from prednisone to dexamethasone in
`castration-resistant prostate cancer patients
`progressing on abiraterone
`D Lorente1, A Omlin1,2, R Ferraldeschi1, C Pezaro1, R Perez1, J Mateo1, A Altavilla1, Z Zafeirou1, N Tunariu1,
`C Parker3, D Dearnaley3, S Gillessen2, J de Bono*,1 and G Attard1
`1Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group and Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The
`Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, UK; 2Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Department of Oncology and
`Haematology, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland and 3Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS
`Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, UK
`
`Background: Abiraterone is a CYP17A1 inhibitor that improves survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Abiraterone
`is licensed in combination with prednisone 5 mg twice daily to prevent a syndrome of secondary mineralocorticoid excess. We
`hypothesised that a ‘steroid switch’
`from prednisone to dexamethasone would induce secondary responses in patients
`progressing on abiraterone and prednisone 5 mg b.i.d.
`
`Methods: We performed a ‘steroid switch’ in patients with CRPC at PSA progression on abiraterone and prednisolone. Patients
`were monitored for secondary declines in PSA, radiological tumour regression and toxicity.
`
`Results: A retrospective analysis of 30 CRPC patients who underwent a steroid switch from prednisolone to dexamethasone while
`on abiraterone was performed. A total of six patients (20%) had a X50% PSA decline that was confirmed by a second PSA level at
`least 3 weeks later. In all, 11 patients (39.2%) had a confirmed X30% PSA decline. Median time to PSA progression on abiraterone
`and dexamethasone was 11.7 weeks (95% CI: 8.6–14.8 weeks) in the whole cohort and 27.6 weeks (95% CI: 14.5–40.7 weeks) in
`patients who achieved a confirmed 50% PSA decline. Nine patients had RECIST evaluable disease: two of these patients had
`RECIST partial response, six patients had stable disease and one patient had progressive disease at the first imaging assessment.
`Treatment was well tolerated, with no grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events. One patient had to be reverted to prednisolone
`because of grade 2 hypotension.
`
`Conclusions: Durable PSA responses occur in up to 40% of patients following a ‘steroid switch’ for PSA progression on
`abiraterone and prednisone. Studies are ongoing to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this response.
`
`two novel hormonal agents have received
`In recent years,
`regulatory approval for the treatment of castration-resistant
`prostate cancer (CRPC). Both abiraterone, a CYP17A1 inhibitor
`that suppresses androgen and oestrogen synthesis, and enzalu-
`tamide, a potent next-generation antiandrogen, have been
`
`randomised,
`in large,
`survival
`shown to improve overall
`placebo-controlled phase III trials (de Bono et al, 2011; Scher
`et al, 2012). Abiraterone was evaluated in phase III trials and is
`licensed for administration in combination with prednisone
`(administered as the active metabolite prednisolone in the UK)
`
`*Correspondence: Professor J de Bono; E-mail: Johann.DeBono@icr.ac.uk
`
`Received 30 May 2014; revised 2 September 2014; accepted 10 September 2014; published online 14 October 2014
`
`& 2014 Cancer Research UK. All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/14
`
`Amerigen Exhibit 1129
`Amerigen v. Janssen
`IPR2016-00286
`
`2248
`
`www.bjcancer.com | DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`

`
`Tumour responses following steroid switch in CRPC
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
`
`Table 1. Overall clinical characteristics at steroid switch: median (range)
`
`Responders (PSA decline X50%) Nonresponders (PSA decline o50%)
`8
`22
`
`65 years (61–82)
`
`69.6 years (51.2–80)
`
`N
`
`Age
`
`ECOG PS
`0
`1
`2
`Haemoglobin (g dl 1)
`Alk Phos (IU l 1)
`LDH (IU l 1)
`Albumin (g dl 1)
`PSA (ng ml 1)
`
`Metastases
`B only
`B þ LN
`B þ V
`B þ LN þ V
`LN only
`
`Previous bicalutamide
`Yes
`No
`
`Previous Dex monotherapy
`Yes
`No
`
`Overall
`30
`
`68.9 years
`
`8 (26.7%)
`19 (63.3%)
`3 (10%)
`
`12.6 (7.9–15.2)
`
`140.5 (48–2238)
`
`172.5 (107–631)
`
`36 (25–42)
`
`199.5 (9.7–2689)
`
`12 (40%)
`12 (40%)
`1 (3.3%)
`3 (10%)
`2 (6.6%)
`
`23 (76.7%)
`7 (23.3%)
`
`9 (30%)
`21 (70%)
`
`4 (50)
`3 (37.5)
`1 (12.5)
`
`12.6 (7.9–14.4)
`
`100 (53–2238)
`
`214 (169–546)
`
`36 (25–42)
`
`331.5 (9.7–2689)
`
`4 (50)
`2 (25)
`1 (12.5)
`0
`1 (12.5)
`
`6 (75)
`2 (25)
`
`4 (50)
`4 (50)
`
`4 (18.2)
`16 (72.9)
`2 (9.1)
`
`12.6 (10.9–15.2)
`
`158 (48–630)
`
`170 (107–631)
`
`37 (33–42)
`
`164 (11–523)
`
`8 (36.4)
`10 (45.5)
`0
`3 (13.6)
`1 (4.5)
`
`17 (80)
`5 (20)
`
`5 (22.7)
`17 (77.3)
`
`6.6 m (2–29)
`
`4 (18.2)
`17 (77.3)
`1 (4.5)
`
`Median time on previous Dex
`
`6.6 m (2–55.2)
`
`10.1 m (3.5–55.2)
`
`Previous CT lines
`0
`1
`2
`
`4 (13.3%)
`24 (80%)
`2 (6.6%)
`
`0
`7 (87.5)
`1 (12.5)
`
`Median Time on AA þ P
`
`6.36 m (2.7–28.7)
`
`6.8 m (4.8–28.7)
`
`5.4 m (2.7–16.7)
`
`Median % PSA decline on AA þ P
`
`71.5% (99% to þ 65%)
`
`78.2% (99% to þ 65%)
`
`66.6% (97% to þ 63%)
`
`Abbreviations: AA ¼ Abiraterone; Alk Phos ¼ Alkaline Phosphatase; B ¼ bone; CAB ¼ combined androgen blockade; CT ¼ chemotherapy; Dex ¼ Dexamethasone; LDH ¼ Lactate
`dehydrogenase; LN ¼ lymph nodes; m ¼ months; NR ¼ not reached; P ¼ prednisolone; PS ¼ performance status; PSA ¼ prostate-specific antigen; V ¼ visceral; yr ¼ years.
`
`secondary
`to prevent a syndrome of
`5 mg twice daily,
`mineralocorticoid excess caused by a loss of negative feedback
`of adrenocorticotropic hormone (Attard et al, 2008).
`We have previously reported a randomised phase II trial of
`dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily vs prednisolone 5 mg b.i.d. in CRPC
`patients, in which the confirmed X50 PSA decline rates were 31%
`for dexamethasone and 17% for prednisolone (Venkitaraman et al,
`2013). Moreover, in our previously reported phase I/II trial of
`abiraterone initially administered without concomitant corticos-
`teroids to 54 patients, the addition of dexamethasone 0.5 mg once
`daily at PSA progression on abiraterone without steroids resulted
`in secondary PSA declines in 25% of patients (Attard et al, 2009),
`regardless of prior progression on the same dose and regimen of
`single agent dexamethasone. We hypothesised that changing
`prednisolone for dexamethasone (a term we designated ‘steroid
`switch’) would be associated with tumour responses and could
`re-induce sensitivity to abiraterone.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`Patient characteristics. We performed a retrospective analysis of
`CRPC patients in whom a steroid switch from prednisolone to
`dexamethasone was performed between January 2011 and
`December 2013 at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
`and the Kantonsspital St. Gallen. All patients were experiencing
`PSA progression according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2
`
`Table 2. Treatment received after discontinuation of
`abiraterone and dexamethasone
`Cabazitaxel
`
`9 (30%)
`
`Docetaxel
`
`Enzalutamide
`
`Carboplatin
`
`PARP inhibitor
`
`Diethylstilboestrol
`
`Best supportive care
`
`3 (10%)
`
`2 (6.7%)
`
`1 (3.3%)
`
`1 (3.3%)
`
`1 (3.3%)
`
`6 (20%)
`
`criteria (PSAWG2) (Scher et al, 2008); in addition, radiological
`progression was observed in three patients before switching
`steroids. All patients were clinically stable. IRB approval to report
`these data was obtained from the Committee for Clinical Research
`at the Royal Marsden and Ethical Committee of the Kantonsspital
`St Gallen. The date of cut-off was the 4th of January 2014.
`A descriptive analysis of clinical characteristics, PSA declines
`and previous treatments was performed. Imaging assessments were
`performed as per local guidelines, every 3–6 months. Treatment
`with abiraterone and dexamethasone was discontinued at the time
`of clinical or radiological progression. Patients who received doses
`of dexamethasone 41 mg once daily for more than 4 weeks were
`excluded from the analysis.
`In accordance with PSAWG2 criteria (Scher et al, 2008), a PSA
`decline was defined as confirmed if it presisted in a second reading at
`
`www.bjcancer.com | DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`2249
`
`

`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
`
`Tumour responses following steroid switch in CRPC
`
`least 3 weeks later. PSA progression was defined as a 25% rise above
`the nadir, confirmed by a second reading at least 3 weeks later (Scher
`et al, 2008). Time to PSA progression was defined as the time from
`
`switch to the first PSA value fulfilling progression criteria. Radiological
`responses were defined as per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria
`In Solid Tumours) version 1.1 (Eisenhauer et al, 2009).
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`0%
`
`–20%
`
`–40%
`
`–60%
`
`–80%
`
`–100%
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`0%
`
`–20%
`
`–40%
`
`–60%
`
`–80%
`
`–100%
`
`Prior single agent dexamethasone
`No prior single agent dexamethasone
`
`Figure 1. Waterfall graph representing PSA declines on steroid switch.
`(A) PSA declines at 12 weeks. (B) Maximum PSA declines. Striped
`bars represent patients with prior single agent dexamethasone;
`nonstriped bars represent patients with no prior single agent
`dexamethasone. PSA increases have been capped at þ 50%.
`
`Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM
`SPSS Statistics version 20. Time on treatment with abiraterone and
`dexamethasone (after steroid switch), time to PSA progression and
`time to PSA nadir were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Patient characteristics. We performed a steroid switch on
`standard doses of abiraterone from prednisolone/prednisone
`5 mg twice daily to dexamethasone 0.5–1 mg once daily at PSA
`progression in 30 patients. A total of 26 patients had a switch from
`10 mg prednisolone/prednisone to 0.5 mg dexamethasone. One
`patient had an initial dose of 1.5 mg once daily, which was
`successfully tapered to 0.5 mg over the first 3 weeks. One patient
`received dexamethasone 2 mg once daily initially, which was
`tapered to 1 mg once daily over 3 weeks; the remaining two
`patients received dexamethasone 1 mg once daily, with no dose
`modifications. Clinical characteristics of patients at the time of
`steroid switch are summarised in Table 1.
`At
`the time of data cut-off, 23 patients had discontinued
`treatment and 7 patients still continued on treatment with
`abiraterone and dexamethasone. Treatments administered after
`discontinuation of abiraterone are summarised in Table 2.
`Nine patients
`(30%) had received previous
`single agent
`dexamethasone; all of
`these patients had documented disease
`progression on dexamethasone, which consisted in PSA progres-
`sion in five patients and PSA and radiological progression in four
`patients. Patients had received abiraterone and prednisolone/
`prednisone for a median of 27.73 weeks (range: 11.7–124.4) before
`replacing prednisolone/prednisone 5 mg twice daily with dexa-
`methasone 0.5–1 mg once daily.
`
`treatment. Treatment with
`Duration of
`and
`abiraterone
`dexamethasone was maintained for a median of 20.6 weeks
`
`Table 3. Clinical characteristics of patients with a confirmed X50% PSA decrease
`
`Max. PSA decline (%)
`Dose of daily Dex (mg)
`
`95.6%
`0.5
`
`84.5%
`0.5
`
`79.4%
`0.5
`
`78.6%
`0.5
`
`77.2%
`1a
`
`57%
`0.5
`
`Clinical characteristics at steroid switch
`Age (years)
`ECOG PS on Switch
`Hb (g dl 1)
`Alk Phos (IU l 1)
`LDH (IU l 1)
`Albumin (g dl 1)
`Metastases
`
`Response to steroid switch
`Baseline PSA before switch (ng ml 1)
`PSA nadir on switch
`Duration of treatment Abi þ Dex (m)
`Time to PSA nadir on Abi þ Dex (m)
`Time to PSA Progression on Abi þ Dex (m)
`
`Treatment before switch
`Duration of treatment AA þ Pred (m)
`Max. PSA decline on AA þ Pred
`Previous single agent Dex (m)
`Time from previous single agent Dex (m)
`Max. PSA decline on Previous single agent Dex
`Previous CT lines
`
`73.1
`1
`10
`2238
`418
`36
`Bone
`
`1084
`48
`12.2 (Ong)
`3.6
`8.7
`
`4.8
`78%
`Yes (59.9)
`28.1
`97%
`1
`
`81.8
`0
`12.4
`100
`214
`42
`Bone, LN
`
`2689
`418
`6.5 (Ong)
`4.7
`3.6
`
`4.8
`27%
`Yes (15.3)
`15.6
`27%
`1
`
`61
`1
`14.4
`57
`171
`37
`LN
`
`9.7
`1.9
`5.7
`1.8
`3.6
`
`22.1
`99%
`No
`—
`—
`1
`
`62.5
`1
`13.7
`85
`169
`34
`Bone, LN
`
`210
`45
`13.9
`6.2
`8.7
`
`14.9
`38%
`Yes (3.5)
`45.8
`38%
`1
`
`63.6
`0
`12.8
`NA
`NA
`NA
`Bone
`
`37.7
`8.5
`5.5 (Ong)
`4.5
`6.4
`
`6.7
`84%
`No
`—
`—
`1
`
`73
`0
`13.6
`53
`242
`36
`LN, Pulm
`
`15
`6.5
`5.8
`1.5
`4.9
`
`6.4
`48%
`Yes (4.9)
`6.4
`71%
`2
`
`Abbreviations: Alk Phos ¼ Alkaline Phosphatase; CT ¼ chemotherapy; Dex ¼ dexamethasone; Hb ¼ haemoglobin; LDH ¼ Lactate dehydrogenase; LN ¼ lymph nodes; m ¼ months; NR ¼ not
`reached; Ong ¼ ongoing; PSA ¼ prostate-specific antigen; Pulm ¼ pulmonary metastases; yr ¼ years.
`a
`Intially on Dexamethasone 2 mg OD, tapered to 1 mg over 2 weeks and kept on 1 mg OD throughout the study.
`
`2250
`
`www.bjcancer.com | DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`

`
`Tumour responses following steroid switch in CRPC
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
`
`Ongoing
`
`Discontinued
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`Time (weeks)
`
`19-Jul-2012
`
`22-Feb-2013
`
`0
`
`–20
`
`–40
`
`–60
`
`–80
`
`–100
`
`% Decline from baseline
`
`2500
`
`Baseline Abi-Pred: 2052 ng ml –1
`23-May-2012
`
`Switch to Abi-Dex: 1084 ng ml –1
`17-Oct-2012
`
`10-Dec-2012: 66 ng ml –1
`
`07-Jan-2013: 60 ng ml –1
`
`Nadir Abi-Dex: 48 ng ml –1
`o4-Feb-2013
`
`PSA progression Abi-Dex: 76 ng ml –1
`08-Jul-2013
`
`09-Sep-2013: 162 ng ml –1
`
`Nadir Abi-Pred: 448 ng ml –1
`20-Aug-2012
`
`0 1-Jul-2 0 1 2
`
`0 1-O ct-2 0 1 2
`
`0 1-Ja n-2 0 1 3
`
`0 1-A pr-2 0 1 3
`
`0 1-Jul-2 0 1 3
`
`0 1-O ct-2 0 1 3
`
`Date
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`PSA (ng ml–1)
`
`500
`
`0
`
`Started Abi-Pred: 28-Apr-2011. PSA 218 ng ml –1
`
`300.00
`
`Started Abi-Dex: 28-Apr-2011. PSA 210 ng ml –1
`
`Nadir Abi-Dex: 45 ng ml –1
`01-Feb-2013
`
`Prog Abi-Dex: 64 ng ml –1
`17-Apr-2013
`
`200.00
`
`PSA (ng ml–1)
`
`100.00
`
`0.00
`
`130
`
`120
`
`110
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`PSA (ng ml–1)
`
`Nadir Abi-Pred: 11-May-2011. PSA 136 ng ml –1
`
`Stopped Abi-Dex: 136 ng ml –1
`18-Sep-2013
`
`01.7.2011 01.1.2012 01.7.2012 01.1.2013 01.7.2013
`
`Date
`
`Switch to Abi-Dex: 130 ng ml –1
`17-Jul-2013
`
`Last PSA: 130 ng ml –1
`11-Dec-2013
`
`Baseline Abi-Pred:
`108 ng ml –1
`17-Apr-2013
`
`Sclerotic changes in bone metastases
`associated with a 77% PSA decline
`
`Baseline: 15-Apr-2013
`
`Steroid switch: 12-Jul-2013
`
`Nadir Abi Pred: 86 ng ml –1 15-May-2013
`
`Nadir Abi-Dex: 91 ng ml –1
`24-Sep-2013
`
`12 weeks post-switch: 14-Oct-2013
`
`PSA progression Abi-Dex:
`91 ng ml –1 24-Sep-2013
`
`26-Jul-2013 02-Sep-2013 14-Oct-2013 11-Dec-2013
`17-Apr-2013
`15-May-2013
`24-Sep-2013
`16-Agu-2013
`12-Nov-2013
`
`Date
`
`Figure 2. Top left: evolution of PSA values in a patient with a 95.6% PSA decline. Top right: evolution of PSA values (%) in patients with a X 50%
`PSA decline. Middle: increased bone lesion sclerosis during treatment in a patient with a 77% PSA decline. Bottom: RECIST PR in supraclavicular
`lymph nodes in a patient with a 30% PSA decline.
`
`(95% CI: 16.2–24.9). A total of 23 patients had discontinued
`treatment and 7 patients continued on treatment at data censoring.
`Of these, 13 patients (56.5%) discontinued treatment owing to
`
`radiological progression, 7 (30.4%) owing to clinical progression
`and 3 (13%) owing to PSA progression exclusively before being
`enroled in subsequent clinical trials.
`
`www.bjcancer.com | DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`2251
`
`

`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
`
`Tumour responses following steroid switch in CRPC
`
`One patient stopped treatment because of radiological progres-
`sion with new liver lesions on the CT scan performed owing to
`clinical worsening (increased fatigue and pain) 4 weeks after the
`steroid switch despite a 55% decline in PSA levels. Upon
`discontinuation of abiraterone, this patient went on to receive
`cabazitaxel chemotherapy.
`
`PSA declines. Declines in PSA 450% that were confirmed by at
`least one PSA value 4 weeks later were observed in six patients.
`Two patients had unconfirmed maximal PSA declines of 66% and
`55%, respectively. PSA declines at 12 weeks and maximum PSA
`declines are represented in Figure 1. The clinical characteristics of
`the six patients with a confirmed PSA decline X50% are
`summarised in Table 3. Four of
`these patients remained on
`treatment at the time of data cut-off. Eleven patients (39%) had
`confirmed PSA declines X30%. Baseline PSA at steroid switch
`ranged from 9.7 to 2689 ng ml 1. Median time to PSA nadir in
`patients with a confirmed 50% PSA decline was 7.7 weeks (95% CI:
`0–20.8 weeks). Median time to PSA progression on abiraterone
`and dexamethasone was 11.7 weeks (95% CI: 8.6–14.8 weeks) in
`the whole cohort and 27.6 weeks (95% CI: 14.5–40.7 weeks) in
`patients who achieved a confirmed 50% PSA decline. The change
`in PSA values relative to baseline is represented in Figure 2. Three
`of seven patients with serum LDH above normal limits at steroid
`switch experienced a post-switch normalisation; all three patients
`had a 50% PSA decline.
`Of the six patients with confirmed 50% PSA declines, four had
`received previous treatment with single agent dexamethasone, for a
`duration ranging between 15.2 and 259.6 weeks. Five patients had
`received prior bicalutamide. Four patients had received prior
`docetaxel, one patient was chemotherapy naı¨ve and one patient
`had received docetaxel and mitoxantrone. Response to previous
`treatment with abiraterone and prednisolone/prednisone ranged
`from a 27% to a 99% PSA decline.
`
`Radiological response. Overall, 20 patients had a CT scan
`performed within 4 weeks before the steroid switch that was used
`as a baseline for response assessment. Nine patients had RECIST
`evaluable disease. One patient, with baseline bone metastasis and a
`histologically proven adrenal metastasis, showed a RECIST partial
`response after 12 weeks of treatment and a 77% confirmed PSA
`decline. A second RECIST partial response in supraclavicular and
`retroperitoneal nodes was observed after 12 weeks in a patient with
`baseline lymph node disease only in conjunction with a confirmed
`30% PSA decline (Figure 2). Five patients with RECIST evaluable
`disease had stable disease on imaging assessment, with maximal
`PSA declines ranging from 80% to 15%. Two of these patients
`showed no change in the size of the lymph nodes, but a significant
`increase in sclerosis of the bone lesions was observed (Figure 2).
`
`Safety. Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3 toxicities (see
`Table 4). No dose reductions of abiraterone were required. One
`patient, who was normotensive on abiraterone and prednisolone
`5 mg b.i.d. and had not been on antihypertensives, experienced
`grade 2 postural hypotension after steroid switch that mandated
`re-initiation of prednisolone 5 mg b.i.d. before final discontinua-
`tion of abiraterone. Postural hypotension resolved after restarting
`prednisolone 5 mg twice daily instead of dexamethasone 0.5 mg
`once daily. Conversely, grade 1 and grade 2 hypertension was
`present
`in six patients (21%),
`four of whom had also had
`hypertension of an equal grade on abiraterone and prednisolone
`5 mg twice daily that persisted despite institution of antihyperten-
`sive medication. Two patients (7.1%) presented with grade 1
`hypokalaemia, one of whom had also previously suffered two
`episodes of grade 1 hypokalaemia on abiraterone and prednisolone
`5 mg twice daily. Two patients (7.1%) presented with self-limiting
`grade 1 to grade 2 transaminase elevation that resolved after 4
`weeks. One patient experienced grade 1 hyponatraemia that lasted
`
`Table 4. Toxicity before and after steroid switch
`
`Grade 1-2 Toxicity
`Hypertension
`
`Hypokalaemia
`
`Transaminase elevation
`Othera
`a
`
`Pre-switch
`11 (39.3%)
`
`8 (28.6%)
`
`2 (7.1%)
`
`1 (3.6%)
`
`Post-switch
`7 (29%)
`
`2 (7.1%)
`
`1 (3.6%)
`
`2 (7.1%)
`
`Other: One patient experienced grade 1 hyponatraemia that lasted for 4 cycles while on
`abiraterone þ prednisolone, which reappeared after steroid switch for 1 cycle and was
`spontaneously recovered. One patient experienced grade 2 postural hypotension after
`steroid switch.
`
`for four cycles while on abiraterone and prednisolone, and
`persisted for two cycles after steroid switch. No new episodes of
`fluid retention or other adverse events were observed.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`This is the first report of multiple durable PSA declines in patients
`treated with abiraterone after a steroid switch from prednisolone
`5 mg b.i.d.
`to dexamethasone 0.5–1 mg once daily. In seven
`patients, maximum PSA declines on abiraterone and dexametha-
`sone were at least 25% othose achieved on abiraterone and
`prednisolone, and eight patients had a longer treatment duration
`on abiraterone and dexamethasone than on abiraterone and
`prednisolone (Figure 1). This hypothesis-generating report should
`now lead to prospective evaluation of changes in steroid dose while
`continuing and after discontinuing abiraterone.
`Radiological responses in soft tissue and/or nodal disease were
`observed in two out of nine patients. Increased sclerosis on CT
`with no change in the size of bone metastases was also observed in
`three patients who also had PSA declines. There are currently no
`established objective criteria to evaluate response in bone
`metastatic disease on CT scans; preliminary data suggest that an
`increase in bone lesion sclerosis may be associated with therapeutic
`response, as suggested by the correlation between reduction in
`FDG uptake and increased CT density (measured in Hounsfield
`units) of bone metastases from prostate cancer (Beheshti et al,
`2008; Costelloe et al, 2010).
`Conversion to dexamethasone was well tolerated and was not
`associated with adrenocortical
`insufficiency or side effects of
`mineralocorticoid excess. Dexamethasone has been reported to
`cause orthostatic hypotension when given as a treatment of
`secondary mineralocorticoid excess in a phase I trial of abiraterone
`without concomitant steroids (Ryan et al, 2010). A currently
`ongoing phase II clinical trial (NCT01867710) is evaluating the
`safety profile of abiraterone given with different steroid regimens
`(prednisolone 5 mg twice daily, prednisolone 2.5 mg twice daily,
`prednisolone 5 mg once daily and dexamethasone 0.5 mg once
`daily) to chemotherapy-naı¨ve metastatic CRPC patients. Moreover,
`abiraterone
`activity could be
`enhanced if
`combined with
`eplerenone instead of prednisolone, which, as previously reported,
`is feasible (Attard et al, 2008, 2009).
`Several hypotheses could be considered to explain the observed
`effect. Possible mechanisms of resistance that would be reversed by
`‘steroid switch’ are as follows:
`
`(1) Activation of the glucocorticoid receptor leads to resistance, as
`recently published for enzalutamide (Arora et al, 2013), which
`is reversed owing to the lower equivalent dose of dexametha-
`sone compared with prednisolone. Reduced activation of the
`glucocorticoid receptor by doses of dexamethasone with a
`lower equivalent glucocorticoid activity induces less activation
`of the GR. In all, 90% of the patients in our study ultimately
`received 0.5 mg dexamethasone daily, which represents a
`67% reduction in glucocorticoid activity compared with
`
`2252
`
`www.bjcancer.com | DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`

`
`Tumour responses following steroid switch in CRPC
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
`
`prednisolone 5 mg twice daily. The remaining three patients
`(10%) received a dose of dexamethasone 1 mg once daily,
`representing a 33% reduction in glucocorticoid activity; only one
`of
`the patients receiving dexamethasone 1 mg once daily
`achieved a 450% PSA decline.
`(2) Resistance occurs secondary to emergence of AR somatic point
`mutations that are activated by prednisolone but not by
`dexamethasone.
`(3) Resistance occurs secondary to activation of the mineralocor-
`ticoid receptor, for which dexamethasone has a lower affinity
`(Lan et al, 1982).
`(4) Other factors that may also contribute to the superior activity of
`dexamethasone in CRPC, including when administered as a
`single agent.
`
`We acknowledge the lack of a control group in which
`abiraterone was discontinued at the time of steroid switch as a
`major limitation of the study. The possibility of the observed
`responses being related to the activity of dexamethasone as a single
`agent can therefore not be excluded. However, the similar response
`rate in patients regardless of progression on prior single agent
`dexamethasone suggests that an alternative mechanism is respon-
`sible for the observed responses.
`In conclusion, performing a steroid switch in patients with a
`rising PSA while on abiraterone can delay the development of
`resistance, and it can induce radiological responses in selected
`patients. Prospective clinical
`trials with integrated biomarker
`studies are now required to further evaluate the extent of benefit
`and the biological mechanisms underlying our observations.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`D Lorente is recipient of a 2-year bursary from the Spanish Society
`of Medical Oncology – ‘Beca SEOM Para la Investigacio´n Trasla-
`cional en el Extranjero’. A Omlin is
`the recipient of a
`2-year bursary from the Swiss Cancer League (No. BIL KLS-
`02592-02-2010). R Ferraldeschi
`is supported by the Wellcome
`Trust. Z Zafeirou is the recipient of a grant from the Hellenic
`Society of Medical Oncology. G Attard is supported by a Cancer
`Research UK Clinician Scientist Fellowship. G Attard and J de
`Bono have received support from Prostate Cancer UK and the
`Prostate Cancer Foundation.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Arora V, Schenkein E, Murali R, Subudhi SK, Wongvipat J, Balbas MD,
`Shah N, Cai L, Efstathiou E, Logothetis C, Zhend D, Sawyers CL (2013)
`Glucocorticoid receptor confers resistance to antiandrogens by bypassing
`androgen receptor blockade. Cell 155(6): 1309–1322.
`Attard G, Reid AH, A’Hern R, Parker C, Oommen NB, Folkerd E, Messiou C,
`Molife LR, Maier G, Thompson E, Olmos D, Sinha R, Lee G, Dowsett M,
`Kaye SB, Dearnaley D, Kheoh T, Molina A, de Bono JS (2009) Selective
`inhibition of CYP17 with abiraterone acetate is highly active in the
`treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(23):
`3742–3748.
`
`Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, Raynaud F, Dowsett M, Settatree S, Barrett M,
`Parker C, Martins V, Folkerd E, Clark J, Cooper CS, Kaye SB, Dearnaley D,
`Lee G, de Bono JS (2008) Phase i clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of
`CYP17, abiraterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant prostate
`cancer commonly remains hormone driven. J Clinical Oncology: Official
`Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 26(28): 4563–4571.
`Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P, Fitz F, Nader M, Loidl W, Broinger G,
`Stoiber F, Foglman I, Langsteger W (2008) Detection of bone metastases
`in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride
`PET-CT: a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(10):
`1766–1774.
`Costelloe CM, Chuang HH, Madewell JE, Ueno NT (2010) Cancer response
`criteria and bone metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST. J Cancer 1:
`80–92.
`de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, Fizazi K, North S, Chu L, Chi KN,
`Jones RJ, Goodman Jr OB, Saad F, Staffurth JN, Mainwaring P, Harland S,
`Flaig TW, Hutson TE, Cheng T, Patterson H, Hainsworth JD, Ryan CJ,
`Sternberg CN, Ellard SL, Fle´chon A, Saleh M, Scholz M, Efstathiou E,
`Zivi A, Bianchini D, Loriot Y, Chieffo N, Kheoh T, Haqq CM,
`Scher HI. COU-AA-301 Investigators (2011) Abiraterone and
`increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. New Engl J Med
`364(21): 1995–2005.
`Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R,
`Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L,
`Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation
`criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
`Eur J Cancer 45(2): 228–247.
`Lan NC, Graham B, Bartter FC, Baxter JD (1982) Binding of steroids to
`mineralocorticoid receptors: implications for in vivo occupancy by
`glucocorticoids. J Clin Endocrinol Met 54(2): 332–342.
`Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fong L, Rosenberg JE, Kantoff P, Raynaud F, Martins V,
`Lee G, Kheoh T, Kim J, Molina A, Small EJ (2010) Phase I clinical trial
`of the CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone acetate demonstrating clinical activity
`in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received prior
`ketoconazole therapy. J Clin Oncol 28(9): 1481–1488.
`Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, Taplin ME, Sternberg CN, Miller K, de Wit R,
`Mulders P, Chi KN, Shore ND, Armstrong AJ, Flaig TW, Fle´chon A,
`Mainwaring P, Fleming M, Hainsworth JD, Hirmand M, Selby B, Seely L,
`de Bono JS. AFFIRM Investigators (2012) Increased survival with
`enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. New Engl J Med
`367(13): 1187–1197.
`Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA,
`Eisenberger MA, Higano C, Bubley GJ, Dreicer R, Petrylak D, Kantoff P,
`Basch E, Kelly WK, Figg WD, Small EJ, Beer TM, Wilding G, Martin A,
`Hussain M. Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (2008)
`Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive
`prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations
`of the prostate cancer clinical trials working group. J Clin Oncol 26(7):
`1148–1159.
`Venkitaraman Ramachandran, Thomas Karen, Murthy Vedang,
`Woode-Amissah Ruth, Dearnaley David Paul, Horwich Alan,
`Huddart Robert Anthony, De Bono Johann Sebastian, Parker Chris (2013)
`A randomized phase II trial of dexamethasone versus prednisolone
`as secondary hormonal therapy in CRPC. ASCO Meeting Abstracts
`31(6_suppl): 123.
`
`This work is published under the standard license to publish agree-
`ment. After 12 months the work will become freely available and
`the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution-
`NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
`
`www.bjcancer.com | DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.531
`
`2253

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket