`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________
`
`RPX CORPORATION and
`PROTECTION ONE, INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`
`
`MD SECURITY SOLUTIONS LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`___________
`
`IPR2016-002851
`Patent 7,864,983
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KARL D. EASTHOM, AND WILLIAM M. FINK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FINK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DANIEL J. WEINBERG
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`1 Protection One, Inc., who filed a Petition in IPR2016-01235, has been joined as a party to the
`petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`MD Security Solutions LLC, Exhibit 2005, Page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, I, Daniel J. Weinberg, hereby attest to the
`
`following:
`
`1. My mailing address is Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP, 350 Marine
`
`Parkway, Suite 200, Redwood Shores, California 94065, my email address is
`
`dweinberg@fawlaw.com, and my telephone number is (650) 730-5501.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the California Bar (admitted in
`
`2003), as well as the following federal courts:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit;
`
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California;
`
`U.S. District Court for the Central District of California; and
`
`U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee.
`
`3.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body;
`
`4.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied;
`
`5.
`
`I have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court
`
`or administrative body against me;
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`-1-
`
`MD Security Solutions LLC, Exhibit 2005, Page 2
`
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a);
`
`8.
`
`In the past three (3) years, I have also applied pro hac vice before the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office in the following IPR actions:
`
`Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. v. B.E.
`Technology, L.L.C.
`Google Inc. v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Google Inc. v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Google Inc. v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Microsoft Corporation v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Microsoft Corporation v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. B.E.
`Technology, L.L.C.
`Facebook, Inc. v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Facebook, Inc. v. B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`Match.com L.L.C. & People Media, Inc. v. B.E.
`Technology, L.L.C.
`Match.com L.L.C. & People Media, Inc. v. B.E.
`Technology, L.L.C.
`Olympus America Inc. and Olympus Medical
`Systems Corp. v. Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inc.
`Olympus America Inc. and Olympus Medical
`Systems Corp. v. Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inc.
`STATS LLC v. Hockeyline, Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00029
`
`IPR2014-00031
`IPR2014-00033
`IPR2014-00038
`IPR2014-00039
`IPR2014-00040
`IPR2014-00044
`
`IPR2014-00052
`IPR2014-00053
`IPR2014-00698
`
`IPR2014-00699
`
`IPR2014-00233
`
`IPR2014-00241
`
`IPR2014-00510
`
`-2-
`
`MD Security Solutions LLC, Exhibit 2005, Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`I graduated from law school in 2003 and I have been engaged full
`
`time in private law practice since October 2003. I am an experienced litigation
`
`attorney and have served as counsel in numerous complex litigations and patent
`
`infringement cases in various district courts, including the Northern District of
`
`California, Southern District of New York, Eastern District of Virginia, Northern
`
`District of Illinois, and Western District of Tennessee.
`
`10.
`
`I am a member of the litigation team for Patent Owner in for MD
`
`Security in MD Security Solutions LLC v. Protection 1, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-1968-
`
`Orl-40GJK, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida,
`
`Orlando Division. In that case, Patent Owner alleges that Petitioner infringes U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,864,983 (the “’983 Patent”). I have reviewed and am familiar with
`
`the ’983 Patent and allegations relating to the validity of the patent. Accordingly, I
`
`am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on February 7, 2017, at Redwood Shores, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Daniel J. Weinberg
`Daniel J. Weinberg
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`MD Security Solutions LLC, Exhibit 2005, Page 4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
