throbber
Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update | Managing Intellectual Property
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`Region:
`
`Welcome: Ellie Yost My Clippings My Searches My Account Logout
`
`Blog
`
`
`
`KYLE BASS’S SUCCESS RATE AT THE PTAB – AN UPDATE
`
`22 December 2015 |
`Michael Loney
`
`Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass has not gotten any
`holiday cheer from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
`with two of his petitions challenging pharmaceutical
`patents denied this month. The Board has now ruled on
`16 of his inter partes review petitions
`
`December has not been kind to hedge
`fund manager Kyle Bass’s efforts to
`invalidate pharmaceutical patents
`through Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`proceedings.
`
`The Board this month has denied
`institution of two of his inter partes
`review petitions. Its decisions on
`December 8 and 17 both involved
`patents covering Pozen’s Vimovo
`arthritis pain treatment, which is
`marketed in the US by Horizon Pharma.
`
`For those keeping score, the PTAB has now given an institution decision
`in 16 of the 33 petitions filed by the Coalition for Affordable Drugs, the
`coalition set up by Bass and Erich Spangenberg to attack pharma patents.
`
`http://www.managingip.com/Blog/3516275/Kyle-Basss-success-rate-at-the-PTABan-updat...
`
`3/10/2016
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2023
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`

`Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update | Managing Intellectual Property
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`This means the board has now given an institution decision on almost half
`of the Coalition for Affordable Drugs petitions (see table below).
`
`Bass’s success rate for institution now stands at
`44%, with the PTAB instituting trial for seven
`IPRs and denying nine. This is down from the
`heady days of October, when Bass could boast a
`54% rate of success after the Board had
`instituted seven of the 13 petitions it had
`decided up until then.
`
`The Board has denied three petitions in a row
`since then.
`
`Bass will be hoping to break this losing streak
`next month when the Board is likely to give
`more decisions, including on two more IPRs
`challenging the Vimovo treatment.
`
`The PTAB has given decisions on all of Bass’s petitions filed until the end
`of June. Next up it must decide on the 12 petitions the Coalition filed in
`August and the five petitions filed in September.
`
`Interestingly, Bass and Spangenberg in November also filed two petitions
`with just their two names listed, and no Coalition for Affordable Drugs.
`These petitions challenged patents owned by Alpex Pharma and
`Fresenius.
`
`The Coalition for Affordable Drugs' IPR petitions*
`
`IPR
`
`Date filed Law firm used by
`
`Patent
`
`Patent owner
`
`number
`
`the Coalition
`
`number
`
`
`
`IPR2015-
`
`February
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`8,663,685 Acorda Therapeutics
`
`00720
`
`10
`
`IPR2015-
`
`February
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`8,007,826 Acorda Therapeutics
`
`00817
`
`27
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 1
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`6,773,720 Cosmo
`
`00988
`
`Technologies/Nogra
`Pharma/Shire
`
`Development/Shire
`
`Inc/Shire Pharmaceuticsl
`Development
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 1 Merchant & Gould
`
`7,056,886 NPS
`
`00990
`
`Pharmaceuticals/Shire
`
`North American Group
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 6 Merchant & Gould
`
`7,895,059 Jazz Pharmaceuticals
`
`01018
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 20 Merchant & Gould
`
`8,754,090 Pharmacyclics
`
`01076
`
`
`
`
`
`
`http://www.managingip.com/Blog/3516275/Kyle-Basss-success-rate-at-the-PTABan-updat...
`
`3/10/2016
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2023
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`

`Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update | Managing Intellectual Property
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`IPR2015-
`01086
`
`April 22 Neifeld IP Law
`
`8,759,393 Biogen International
`
`
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 23
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`6,315,720 Celgene Corporation
`
`01102
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 23
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`6,315,720 Celgene Corporation
`
`01096
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 23
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`6,315,720 Celgene Corporation
`
`01103
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 23
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`6,045,501 Celgene Corporation
`
`01092
`
`IPR2015-
`
`April 23 Merchant & Gould
`
`7,056,886 NPS
`
`01093
`
`Pharmaceuticals/Shire
`
`North American Group
`
`IPR2015-
`
`May 1
`
`Neifeld IP Law
`
`8,399,514 Biogen MA
`
`01136
`
`IPR2015-
`01169
`
`May 7
`
`Merchant & Gould
`
`5,635,517 Celgene Corporation
`
`IPR2015-
`
`May 21
`
`Conley Rose
`
`6,926,907 Pozen (Horizon Pharma
`
`01241
`
`bought the rights to the
`
`drug in November
`2013))
`
`IPR2015-
`
`June 5
`
`Conley Rose
`
`8,858,996 Horizon Pharma/Pozen
`
`01344
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 7 Conley Rose
`
`8,852,636 Pozen (Horizon Pharma
`
`01680
`
`bought the rights to the
`
`drug in November
`
`2013))
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 12 Conley Rose
`
`8,945,621 Horizon Pharma/Pozen
`
`01718
`
`IPR2015-
`01723
`
`August 13 Cunningham
`Swaim/Winstead
`
`6,967,208 Bristol Myers Squibb
`Pharma
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 20 Merchant & Gould
`
` 7,582,621 Anacor/Sandoz
`
`01776
`
`IPR2015-
`01785
`
`August 20 Merchant & Gould
`
`7,767,657 Anacor/Sandoz
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 20 Merchant & Gould
`
`7,767,657 Anacor/Sandoz
`
`01780
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 22 Neifeld IP Law
`
`8,163,522 Amgen/Hoffmann-La
`
`01792
`
`Roche/Immunex
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 24 Law Offices of
`
`8,835,460 Insys Pharma
`
`01799
`
`
`
`Gregory J
`
`
`
`
`
`http://www.managingip.com/Blog/3516275/Kyle-Basss-success-rate-at-the-PTABan-updat...
`
`3/10/2016
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2023
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`

`Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update | Managing Intellectual Property
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`Hare & War
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 24 Law Offices of
`
`8,835,459 Insys Pharma
`
`01797
`
`Gregory J
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`
`Hare & War
`
`IPR2015-
`
`August 24 Law Offices of
`
`8,486,972 Insys Pharma
`
`01800
`
`Gregory J
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`
`Hare & War
`
`IPR2015-
`01835
`
`August 28 Law Offices of
`Gregory J
`
`8,618,135 Aegerion
`Pharmaceuticals/Trustees
`
`Juxtapid
`
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`
`of The University of
`
`Hare & War
`
`Pennsylvania
`
`IPR2015-
`01836
`
`August 28 Law Offices of
`Gregory J
`
`7,932,268 Aegerion
`Pharmaceuticals/Trustees
`
`Juxtapid
`
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`
`of The University of
`
`Hare & War
`
`Pennsylvania
`
`IPR2015-
`
`September
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`8,440,703 Acorda Therapeutics
`
`Ampyra
`
`01850
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-
`
`September
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`8,007,826 Acorda Therapeutics
`
`Ampyra
`
`01853
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-
`
`September
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`8,354,437 Acorda Therapeutics
`
`Ampyra
`
`01858
`
`3
`
`IPR2015-
`01857
`
`September
`3
`
`Skiermont Puckett
`
`8,663,685 Acorda Therapeutics
`
`Ampyra
`
`IPR2015-
`
`September
`
`Neifeld IP Law
`
`8,399,514 Biogen MA
`
`Tecfidera
`
`01993
`
`28
`
`All of the IPRs list the petitioners as the Coalition for Affordable Drugs, J Kyle Bass, Erich
`
`Spangenberg, Hayman Capital Management, various Hayman funds, IP Navigation Group, and
`
`nXn Partners
`
`Source: Docket Navigator
`
`
`
`
`IPR petitions filed listing only Kyle Bass and Erich Spangenberg
`
`IPR
`
`Date filed Law firm used
`
`Patent
`
`Patent
`
`Drug
`
`number
`
`number
`
`owner
`
`used in
`
`IPR2016-
`00245
`
`November
`24
`
`Law Offices of Gregory J
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`
`8,440,170 Alpex
`Pharma
`
`Suprenza
`
`Hare & War
`
`IPR2016-
`00254
`
`November
`25
`
`Law Offices of Gregory J
`Gonsalves/McNeeley
`
`8,476,010 Fresenius
`Kabi
`
`Diprivan
`
`Hare & War
`
`Source: Docket Navigator
`
`
`
`
`http://www.managingip.com/Blog/3516275/Kyle-Basss-success-rate-at-the-PTABan-updat...
`
`3/10/2016
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2023
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`

`Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update | Managing Intellectual Property
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`Only 30% of Managing IP content is published on the blog – to access
`all of our content you need to be a subscriber.
`
`We like to offer our loyal blog readers a special rate, so simply fill in this
`form in to qualify and we will be in contact to discuss your subscription
`options.
`
`COMMENTS
`
`Ellie Yost
`
`Display this name
`
` 
`
`
`
`eyost@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Please enter a comment here... Please note
`comments are subject to editorial review.
`
`Type the text
`
`Privacy & Terms
`
`
`
`Notify me of follow up comments
`
`
`
`
`
`http://www.managingip.com/Blog/3516275/Kyle-Basss-success-rate-at-the-PTABan-updat...
`
`3/10/2016
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2023
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`
`
`

`

`Kyle Bass’s success rate at the PTAB – an update | Managing Intellectual Property
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`THE MATERIAL ON THIS SITE IS FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS AND
`THEIR PROFESSIONAL ADVISERS. IT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. PLEASE READ OUR TERMS AND
`CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY BEFORE USING THE SITE. ALL MATERIAL SUBJECT TO STRICTLY
`ENFORCED COPYRIGHT LAWS. © 2016 EUROMONEY INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR PLC. FOR HELP PLEASE
`SEE OUR FAQ.
`
`v 1.0.26
`
`http://www.managingip.com/Blog/3516275/Kyle-Basss-success-rate-at-the-PTABan-updat...
`
`3/10/2016
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2023
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket