throbber
United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`NeoChord, Inc.
`v.
`University of Maryland, Baltimore
`
`IPR2016-00208
`
`Patent Owner’s Demonstratives
`Oral Argument
`January 31, 2017
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`1
`
`

`

`Claim 19
`
`19 A method for treating a defective I]I1llZI'Eil er trienspid
`Valve, eemprising:
`pi:".1"l'.?Lll£.l11'$|.'Ill.‘*:‘-l},*' aeeeaairig an Eipltftll regieii el a heart with a
`catheter-based device; and
`repairing a cardiac valve by use ef said device,
`wherein the repairing eemprises replacing at least ene
`cherdae tendineae, and
`wherein the replaced eherdae tendineae CDII1pI'i5ES a suture
`with one er Inere leaflets ef the heart.
`
`(‘386 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 22:6-14)
`(’386 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 22:6-14)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`2
`2
`
`

`

`Proposed Constructions - “Percutaneously
`Accessing an Apical Region of a Heart”
`Patent Owner’s Construction
`
`Petitioner’s Construction
`
`(Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 2)
`
`(Petition (Paper 1) at 12; see also Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 12) at 3)
`3
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`

`

`The Specification
`
`(‘386 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 7:35-44, see also Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 5)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`4
`
`

`

`The Specification
`
`****
`
`(‘386 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 11:35-52, see also Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 3)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`5
`
`

`

`Dictionary Definition
`
`(Patent Owner Response (Paper 11), Exhibit 2007)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`6
`
`

`

`The Seldinger Technique is Performed
`Through Unbroken Skin
`
`****
`
`(Patent Owner Response (Paper 11), Exhibit 2001, ¶¶ 40-41)
`7
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`

`

`The Seldinger Technique
`
`(Exhibit 2009; see also Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 8, Exhibit 2001 at ¶40, Exhibit 2010 at 2)
`8
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`

`

`Claim 1 – Broader than Percutaneous
`
`(‘386 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 20:41-52, emphasis added;
`see also Patent Owner Response (Paper 11), at 9)
`
`(‘386 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 22:6-14,
`emphasis added)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`9
`
`

`

`Speziali is not “percutaneous”
`
`(Petition (Paper 1) at 23, see also, Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 14)
`
`(Ex. 1006, 5:1-5, see also, Aklog Dep. Tr. at 20:8-23:4)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`10
`
`

`

`Lattouf is not “percutaneous”
`
`(Petition (Paper 1) at 34, see also, Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 27)
`
`(Ex. 1004, 2:35-39)
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`(Ex. 1004, 11:24-27)
`11
`
`

`

`No Motivation to Combine
`
`• Speziali and Bachman (Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 16-26)
`• Lattouf and Carpentier (Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 26-32)
`• Lattouf and Bachman (Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 33-40)
`• Lattouf and Downing (Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 41-44)
`• Lattouf, Carpentier and Downing
`
` (Patent Owner Response (Paper 11) at 49-50)
`
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`12
`
`

`

`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`NeoChord, Inc.
`v.
`University of Maryland, Baltimore
`
`IPR2016-00208
`
`Patent Owner’s Demonstratives
`Oral Argument
`January 31, 2017
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket