throbber
Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 1/38
`
`

`
`Medicinal
`
`Chemistry
`
`SEVENTH EDITION
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 2/38
`
`

`
`Li .i 1iist
`SEVENTH EDITION
`
`THOMAS
`
`Edited By
`LEMKE PHD
`Professor Emeritus
`
`College of Pharmacy
`University of Houston
`Houston Texas
`
`Associate Editors
`
`VICTORIA
`
`ROCHE PHD
`Professor ofPharmacy Sciences
`School ofPharmacy and Health Professions
`
`Creihton University
`Omaha Nebraska
`
`DAVHD
`
`WILLIAMS PHD
`Professor Emeritus of Chemistry
`Massachusetts College ofPharmacy and
`Health Sciences
`
`Boston Massachusetts
`
`WILLIAM ZITO PHD
`Professor Pharmaceutical Sciences
`College ofPharmacy and Allied Health
`Professions
`
`St John University
`amaica New York
`
`Wolters Kiuwer Lippincott Williams Wilkins
`Hea
`
`Battimore New York
`PhiLadelphia
`Buenos Aires Hong Kong
`
`Sydney
`
`London
`
`Tokyo
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 3/38
`
`

`
`Acquisitions Editor David Troy
`Klingler and Paula Williams
`Product Managers Andrea
`Marketing Manager Joy Fischer-Williams
`Designer Doug Smock
`Compositor SPi Global
`
`Seventh Edition
`
`2013 Lippincott Williams Wilkins Wolters Kluwer business
`Copyright
`351 West Camden Street
`Two Commerce Square
`Baltimore MD 21201
`2001 Market Street
`Philadelphia PA 19103
`
`Printed in China
`
`All rights reserved This book is protected by copyright No part of this book may be reproduced or
`transmitted in any form or by any means including as photocopies
`or scanned in or other electronic
`copies or utilized by any information storage and retrie\ al system without written permission from the
`copyright owner except
`for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews Materials appear-
`duties as U.S government employees
`ing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official
`copyright To request permission please contact Lippincott
`are not covered by the above-mentioned
`Williams Sc Wilkins at Two Commerce Square 2001 Market Street Philadelphia PA 19103 via email at
`permissions@lww.com or via website at lwwcom products and services
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`edited by Thomas
`Foyes principles of medicinal chemistry
`7th ed
`Roche William Zito
`editors Victoria
`cm
`Principles of medicinal chemistry
`references
`Includes bibliographical
`ISBN 978
`60913 345-0
`II Lemke Thomas
`Foye William
`chemistry
`
`III Williams David
`
`and indexes
`
`616.0756
`
`Chemistry Pharmaceutical QV 744
`dc23
`
`Lemke David
`
`Williams
`
`associate
`
`1938- IV Title Principles of medicinal
`
`2011036313
`
`DISCLAIMER
`has been taken to confirm the accuracy of the information present and to describe generally
`Cai
`accepted practices However
`the authors editors and publisher are not responsible for errors or omis
`sions or for any consequences from application of the information in this book and make no warranty
`expressed or implied with respect
`to the currency completeness or accuracy of the contents of the
`publication Application of this information in
`particular situation remains the professional respon
`treatments described and recommended may not be considered
`the clinical
`sibility of the practitioner
`absolute and universal
`recommendations
`The authors editors and publisher have exerted every effort
`to ensure that drug selection
`dosage set forth in this text are in accordance with the current recommendations and practice at
`the
`time of publication However in view of ongoing research changes in government regulations and the
`flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions the reader is urged to check
`constant
`the package insert for each drug for any change in indications and dosage and for added warnings
`and precautions This is particularly important when the recommended agent
`new or infrequently
`employed diug
`Some drugs and medical devices presented
`in this publication have Food and Drug Administration
`FDA clearance for limited use in restricted research settings It
`is the responsibility of the health care
`provider to ascertain the FDA status of each drug or device planned for use in their clinical practice
`
`and
`
`is
`
`To purchase additional copies of this book call our customer service department at 800 638-3030 or
`fax orders to 301 223-2320 International customers should call 301 223-2300
`
`www.lww.com LippincottWilliams
`Visit Lippincott Williams Wilkins on the Internet http
`are available from 830 am to 600 pm EST
`customer service representatives
`
`Sc Wilkins
`
`987654321
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 4/38
`
`

`
`ontei
`
`Preface
`Contributors
`
`vii
`
`xi
`
`Reviewers
`
`xv
`
`History and Evolution of Medicinal
`Chemistry
`NEUMEYER
`
`JOHN
`
`PART
`
`Principles ofDrug Discovery
`
`Chapter
`
`Chapter
`
`hapter
`
`Drug Discovery from Natural
`Products
`13
`DOUGLAS KINGHORN
`
`Drug Design and Relationship of
`Functional Groups to Pharmacologic
`29
`Activity
`ZAVOD AND JAMES
`ROBIN
`
`KNITTEL
`
`and Biopharmaceutical
`Physicochemical
`Properties of Drug Substances
`and Pharmacokinetics
`61
`SUNIL
`
`JAMBHEKAR
`
`Chapter
`
`Drug Metabolism 106
`WILLIAMS
`DAVID
`
`hapter
`
`hapter
`
`hapter
`
`hapter
`
`Membrane Drug Transporters
`MORRIS AND BRIDGFT
`MARILYN
`
`191
`MORSF
`
`Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
`TALELE MARC GILLESPIE
`TANAJI
`AND VIJAYA
`KORLIPARA
`
`210
`
`Receptors as Targets br Drug
`263
`Discovery
`JOHNSON AND TIMOTHY
`DAVID
`
`MAHER
`
`Drug Discovery Through Enzyme
`283
`Inhibition
`STEPHEN KERR
`
`PART II Drug Receptors Affecting
`Neurotransmission and Enzymes as Catalytic
`Receptors
`
`Chapter
`
`Drugs Mfecting Cholinergic
`309
`Neurotransmission
`
`KIM FlEER
`
`Chapter 10
`
`Adrenergic Receptors and Drugs Mfecting
`340
`Adrenergic Neurotransmission
`ROBERT
`GRIFFITH
`
`Chapter
`
`Serotonin Receptors and Drugs Mfecting
`365
`Serotonergic Neurotransinission
`GLENNON AND
`RICHARD
`MkLGORZATA DUKAT
`
`Chapter 12
`
`Amino Acid Neurotransmitters in the
`Centri1 Nervous System 397
`TIMOTHY
`MAHER
`
`PART III Pharmacodynamic Agents
`Drugs Affecting Central Nervous System
`Section
`
`Chapter 13
`
`Drugs Used to Treat Neuromuscular
`Disorders Antiparkinsonian
`and Spasmolytic Agents
`419
`RAYMOND
`BOOTH
`
`Chapter 14
`
`Antipsychotic and Anxiolytic Drugs
`RAYMOND
`BOOTH
`
`448
`
`Chapter
`
`15
`
`Sedative-Hypnotics
`MON IRI
`NADER
`
`485
`
`Chapter 16
`
`Anesthetic Agents General and Local
`Anesthetics
`508
`TIMOTHY
`MAHER
`
`Chapter 17
`
`Antiseizure Drugs
`BARBARA LEDUC
`
`540
`
`xvii
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 5/38
`
`

`
`xviii
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Chapter
`
`18
`
`Antidepressants
`DAVID
`WILLIAMS
`
`570
`
`Chapter 19
`
`Hallucinogens Stimulants and Related
`Drugs of Abuse nd Their Ther2pelitic
`632
`GLEN NON
`
`Potential
`RICHARD
`
`Chapter
`
`658
`Central Analgesics
`WILLIAMS VICTORIA
`DAVID
`AND EDWARD
`ROCHE
`
`ROCHE
`
`Section
`
`Drugs Affecting the Cardiovascular System
`
`Chapter
`
`21
`
`Cardiac Agents Cardiac Glycosides
`Antianginal and Antiarrhythmic
`700
`Drugs
`AHMED
`MEHANNA
`
`Chapter 32
`
`Antihistamines and Related Antiallergic
`and Antiulcer Agents
`1045
`WENDEL
`NELSON
`
`Section
`
`Chemotherapeutic Agents
`
`Chapter 33
`
`Antibiotics and Antimicrobial
`1073
`GENTRY
`
`Agents
`ELMER
`
`Chapter 34
`
`Antiparasitic Agents
`THOMAS
`LEMKE
`
`1125
`
`Chapter 35
`
`Antifungal Agents
`ROBERT
`GRIFFITH
`
`1158
`
`Chapter 36
`
`Antimycobacterial Agents
`THOMAS
`LEMKE
`
`1175
`
`Chapter 22
`
`728
`Diuretics
`HARVISON AND GARY
`PETER
`
`RAN KIN
`
`Chapter 37
`
`Cancer and Chemotherapy
`ROCHE
`VICTORIA
`
`1199
`
`Chapter 23
`
`Agents Mfecting the Renin-Angiotensin
`Pathway and Calcium Blockers
`747
`MARC HARROLD
`
`Chapter 38
`
`Antiviral Agents and Protease
`1267
`Inhibitors
`WOSTER
`
`PATRICK
`
`Chapter 24
`
`Central and Peripheral Sympatholytics
`and Vasodilators
`781
`DAVID
`WILLIAMS
`
`Chapter 25
`
`Antihyperlipoproteinemics
`of Cholesterol Biosynthesis
`MARC HARROLD
`
`and Inhibitors
`815
`
`pter 26
`
`Antithrombotics Thrombolytics
`Antiplatelets and Coagulants
`MATTHIASC IIJ
`
`841
`
`Drugs Affecting the Hormonal Systems
`
`Insulin and Drugs Used to Treat
`Tabetes
`877
`WILLIAM ZITO
`
`enocorticoids
`NE
`MILLER ROBERT
`\MES
`DALTON
`
`907
`
`BRUEGGEMEIER
`
`PART IV Disease State Management
`
`Chapter 39
`
`Asthma and Chronic
`Pulmonary Disease
`WILLIAM ZITO
`
`Obstructive
`
`1309
`
`Chapter 40
`
`Mens Health
`1346
`DUANE
`MILLER ROBERT
`AND JAMES
`DALTON
`
`Chapter 41 Womens Health
`ZAVOD
`ROBIN
`
`1386
`
`BRUEGGEMEIER
`
`Chapter 42
`
`Nutrition and Obesity
`1434
`LEMKE AND DAVID
`THOMAS
`
`WILLIAMS
`
`Appendix
`
`pK and CLogP Values for Some Drugs
`and pK Values for Miscellaneous Organic
`Acids and Bases
`1469
`
`Appendix
`
`pH Values for Tissue Fluids
`
`1479
`
`Function and Thyroid Drugs
`IJAMALI
`
`943
`
`Drug Index
`Index
`Subject
`
`1481
`
`1489
`
`Chapter 30
`
`Calcium Homeostasis
`ZAVOD
`ROBIN
`
`964
`
`Section
`
`Drugs Affecting the Immune System
`
`Chapter 31
`
`Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
`RONALD BORNE MARK LEVI
`AND NORMAN WILSON
`
`987
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 6/38
`
`

`
`cti
`
`Acti
`
`ND JAMES
`
`bbreviations
`
`hydrochloric acid
`
`intravenous
`
`molecular weight
`aOH sodium hydroxide
`
`PABA
`aminobenzoic acid
`QSAR quantitative structureactivity
`relationship
`
`SAR structureactivity relationship
`USP U.S Pharmacopeia
`
`edicinal chemistry is an interdisciplinary science at
`intersection of organic chemistry biochemistry bio
`ganic chemistry computational chemistry pharma
`ology pharmacognosy molecular biology and physical
`ilemistry This branch of chemistry is involved with the
`tntificatiun design synthesis and develupmeni of 1itw
`rugs that are safe and suitable for therapeutic use in
`umans and pets It also includes the study of marketed
`ugs their biologic properties and their quantitative
`uctureactivity relationships QSARs
`Medicinal chemistry studies how chemical structure
`fluences biologic activity As such it
`is necessary to
`derstand not only the mechanism by which
`drug
`erts its effect but also how the molecular and physico
`emical properties of the molecule influence the drugs
`armacokinetics absorption distribution metabolism
`xicity and elimination and pharmacodynamics
`what
`drug does to the body The term physicochemical
`operties refers to how the functional groups present
`wt ilin
`molecule influence its acidbase properties
`ater snluhility partitinn cnefflcient crystal structure ste
`eochemistry and ability to interact with biologic systems
`and receptor sites
`such as enzyme active sites Chapter
`
`To design better medicinal agents the rela
`Chapter
`tive contribution that each functional group i.e pharma
`cophore makes to the overall physicochemical properties
`the molecule must be evaluated Studies of this type
`of
`involve modification of the molecule in
`systematic fash
`dtitrmination of how thest changcs
`ion followtd by
`affect biologic activity Such
`studies are referred to as
`relationships SARsthat is the rela
`structureactivity
`tionship of how structural
`features of the molecule con-
`tribute to or take away from the desired biologic activity
`Because of the foundational nature of the content of
`there are numerous case studies presented
`this chapter
`the chapter as boxes as well as at the end
`throughout
`In addition
`the conclusion
`list of study questions at
`ofand unique tothis chapter provides further self-
`study material related to the subject of medicinal chem
`istry drug design
`
`NTRODUCTION
`
`Chemical cnmpoiinds usually derived frnm plants and
`have been used by humans for
`other natural sources
`thousands of years to alleviate pain diarrhea infection
`
`29
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 7/38
`
`

`
`30
`
`PART
`
`PRINCIPLES OF DRUG DISCOVERY
`
`and various other maladies Until
`the 19th century
`these remedies were primarily crude preparations of
`plant material of unknown constitution The revolution
`in synthetic organic chemistry during the 19th century
`concerted effort
`produced
`toward identification of the
`structures of the active
`constituents of these naturally
`derived medicinals and synthesis of what were hoped to
`be more efficacious agents By determining the molecu
`lar structures of the active components of these complex
`mixtures it was thought
`better iinderst2nding of
`that
`how these components worked could be elucidated
`
`BETWEEN MOLECULAR
`RELATIONSHIP
`STRUCTURE AND BIOLOGIC ACTIVITY
`
`Early studies of the relationship between chemical struc
`ture and biologic activity were conducted by Crum-Brown
`and Fraser
`in 1869 They demonstrated that many
`containing tertiary amine groups exhibited
`compounds
`activity as muscle relaxants when converted to quaternary
`ammonium compounds Molecules with widely differing
`pharmacologic properties such as strychnine
`convul
`sant morphine an analgesic nicotine
`deterrent
`and atropine an anticholinergic
`could
`insecticide
`to muscle relaxants with properties simi
`be converted
`to those of tubocurarine when methylated Fig 2.1
`lar
`that mus
`Crum-Brown and Fraser
`therefore concluded
`cle relaxant activity required the presence of
`quater
`nary ammonium group within the structure This initial
`hypothesis was later disproven by the discovery ofthe natu
`ral neurotransmitter and activator of muscle contraction
`acetylcholine Fig 2.2 Even though Crum-Brown and
`Frasers initial hypothesis that related chemical structure
`it demon-
`with action as muscle relaxant was incorrect
`that molecular structure influences
`strated the concept
`the biologic activity of chemical entities and that altera
`tions in structure produce changes in biologic action
`With the discovery by Crum-Brown and Fraser
`that
`quaternary ammonium groups could produce molecules
`with muscle relaxant properties scientists began to look
`for other functional groups that produce specific bio
`logic responses At this time it was thought
`that specific
`chemical groups or nuclei rings were responsible for
`specific biologic effects This led to the postulate that
`took some time to disprove that one chemical group
`Even aftei
`gives unt biological actioii
`the discovei
`by Loewi and Navrati
`of acetylcholine
`which effec
`tively dispensed with Crum-Brown and Frasers concept
`of all quaternary ammonium compounds being muscle
`relaxants this was still considered to be dogma and took
`long time to refute
`
`SELECTIVITY OF DRUG ACTION AND DRUG
`RECEPTORS
`
`Although the structures ofmany drugs or xeiiobiotics
`at least their functional group composition were known
`at the start of the 20th century how these compounds
`
`H3CO
`
`H3H
`
`çO \/
`
`OH
`
`CH3O
`
`Tubocurarine
`muscle relaxant
`
`201
`
`OH3
`
`HOH
`
`Morphine
`analgesic
`
`.QLN CH3
`
`Nicotine
`
`insecticide
`
`H3ON
`
`N-Methylmorphine
`muscle relaxant
`
`LN H3C 0H3
`
`N-Methylnicotine
`muscle relaxant
`
`Atropine
`mydriatic
`
`N-Methylatropine
`muscle relaxant
`
`HGURE
`
`Effects of methylation on biologic activity
`
`mystery Using his obser
`exerted their effects was still
`vations with regard to the staining behavior of micro-
`the concept of drug
`organisms Ehrlich
`developed
`receptors He postulated that certain side chains on the
`surfaces of cells were complementary to the dyes or
`drug and suggested thai
`the two could tlieiefore intei
`In the case of antimicrobial com
`act with one another
`pounds interaction of the chemical with the cell surface
`side chains produced
`toxic effect This concept was
`the first description of what
`later became known as the
`for explaining the biologic action
`receptor hypothesis
`of chemical entities Ehrlich also discussed selectivity
`
`OH3
`
`H30 OCH3
`
`FiGURE 22
`
`Acetylcholine
`
`neurotransriitter and muscle relaxant
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 8/38
`
`

`
`CHAPTER 2/ DRUG DESIGN AND RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL GROUPS TO PHARMACOLOGIC ACTIVITY
`
`31
`
`of drug action via the concept of magic bullet He
`this selectivity permitted eradication of
`suggested that
`disease states without significant harm coming to the
`organism being treated i.e the patient This was later
`and today is referred to as selec
`riiodified by Albert
`tive toxicity An example of poor selectivity was demon-
`strated when Ehrlich developed organic arsenicals that
`result of their irrevers
`were toxic to trypanosomes as
`ible reaction with thiol groups -SH on vital proteins
`The formation of AsS bonds resulted in death to the
`target organism Unfortunately these compounds were
`toxic not only to the target organism but also to the host
`once certain blood levels of arsenic were achieved
`The paradox that
`the discovery of
`resulted after
`acetylcholinehow one chemical
`group can produce
`two different biologic effects i.e muscle relaxation and
`muscle contractionwas
`using the
`explained by Ing
`actions of acetylcholine and tubocurarine as his examples
`that both acetyl
`see also Chapter
`Ing hypothesized
`choline and tubocurarine act at
`the same receptor but
`that one molecule fits to the receptor in more comple
`mentary manner and activates it causing muscle con-
`traction Ing did not elaborate just how this activation
`occurred The blocking effect of the larger molecule
`tubocurarine
`of
`could be explained by its occupation
`part of the receptor
`thereby preventing acetylcholine
`the smaller molecule from interacting with the receptor
`With both molecules the quaternary ammonium func
`common structural
`feature and inter-
`tional group is
`acts with the same region of the receptor
`If one closely
`examines the structures of other molecules with opposing
`effects on the same pharmacologic system this appears to
`common theme Molecules that block the effects of
`be
`such as norepinephrine his-
`natural neurotransmitters
`tamine dopamine or serotonin for example are called
`antagonists and are usually larger in size than the native
`compound which is not the case for antagonists of pep-
`tide neurotransmitters and hormones such as cholecysto
`kinin melanocortin or substance
`Antagonists to these
`peptide molecules are usually smaller in size However
`the type of neurotransmitter
`regardless of
`biogenic
`amine or peptide both agonists and antagonists share
`common structural
`features with the neurotransmitter
`to the con-
`they influence This provides support
`that
`cept that the structure of molecule its composition and
`arrangement of functional groups determines the type
`i.e SAR For
`of pharmacologic effect
`that it possesses
`example compounds that are muscle relaxants that act
`via the cholinergic nervous system possess
`quaternary
`ammonium or protonated tertiary ammonium group and
`are larger than acetylcholine
`compare acetylcholine
`in
`Fig 2.2 with tubocurarine in Fig 2.1
`SARs are the underlying principle of medicinal chem
`istry Similar molecules exert similar biologic actions in
`corollary to this is that structural ele
`qualitative sense
`ments functional groups within molecule most often
`contribute in an additive manner to the physicochemical
`properties of molecule and therefore to its biologic
`
`action One need only peruse the structures of drug
`molecules in particular pharmacologic class to become
`convinced e.g histamine H1 antagonists histamine H2
`In the quest for
`antagonists f3-adrenergic antagonists
`better medicinal agents drugs it must be determined
`which functional groups within
`specific structure are
`important for its pharmacologic activity and how these
`groups can be modified to produce more potent more
`selective and safer compounds
`An example of how different
`functional groups can
`yield chemical entities with similar physicochemical
`properties is demonstrated by the sulfanilamide antibi
`otics In Figure 2.3 the structures of sulfanilamide and
`p-aminobenzoic acid PABA are shown In 1940 Woods
`demonstrated that PARA reverses the antibacterial
`action of sulfanilamide and other sulfonamide-based
`and that both PABA and sulfanilamide
`antibacterials
`have similar steric and electronic properties Both mol
`ecules contain acidic functional groups with PABA con-
`taming an aromatic carboxylic acid and sulfanilamide an
`aromatic sulfonamide When ionized at physiologic pH
`both compounds have
`similar electronic configuration
`and the distance between the ionized acid and the weakly
`basic amino group is also very similar It should be no
`surprise that sulfanilamide acts as an antagonist to PABA
`metabolism in bacteria
`
`Biologic Targets for Drug Action
`In order for drug molecules to exhibit their pharmaco
`logic activity they must interact with
`biologic target
`receptor enzyme nucleic acid or excitable
`typically
`membrane or other biopolymer These
`interactions
`occur between the functional groups found in the drug
`molecule and those found within each biologic target
`The relative fit of each drug molecule with its target is
`number of physicochemical
`function of
`properties
`including acidbase chemistry and related ionization
`functional group shape and size and three-dimensional
`spatial orientation The quality of this fit
`has
`direct
`impact on the biologic response produced
`In this
`are discussed
`functional group characteristics
`chapter
`as means to better understand overall drug molecule
`absorption distribution metabolism and excretion as
`interaction with
`well as potential
`biologic target
`
`6.9A
`
`oso
`
`p-Aminobenzoic acid
`
`Sulfanilamide
`
`acid PABA and
`FIGURE 2.3
`Ionized forms ofp-aminobenzoic
`between amine and
`sulfanilamide with comparison of the distance
`ionized acids of each compound Note how closely sulfanilamide
`resembles PABA
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 9/38
`
`

`
`32
`
`PART
`
`PRINCIPLES OF DRUG DISCOVERY
`
`PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF DRUGS
`
`AcidBase Properties
`The human body is 70 to 75% water which amounts to
`160-lb 73-kg
`of water
`approximately 51 to 55
`for
`individual For an average drug molecule with molecu
`dose of 20 mg this leads
`lar weight of 200 g/mol and
`solution concentration of approximately
`10
`to
`riM When
`considering the solution behavior
`drug within the body we are dealing with
`of
`dilute
`acidbase
`solution for which the Brônsted-Lowry
`theory is most appropriate
`to explain and predict
`acidbase behavior This is
`very important concept
`in medicinal chemistry because the acidbase proper-
`direct effect on absorp
`ties of drug molecules have
`cxci etioji aiid compatibility with other drugs iii
`tioii
`solution According to the Brônsted-Lowry Theory an
`acid is any substance capable of yielding
`proton
`and base is any substance capable of accepting
`proton When an acid gives up
`base it
`proton to
`converted to its conjugate base Similarly when
`base
`to its conjugate acid
`is converted
`proton it
`accepts
`Eqs 2.1 and 2.2
`
`is
`
`Eq 2.1
`
`CH3COOH
`Acid
`
`H20
`Base
`
`CH3COO
`Conjugate
`
`H3O
`Conjugate
`
`acetic acid
`
`water
`
`Base
`
`Acid
`
`acetate
`
`hydronium ion
`
`Eq
`
`CH3NH3
`CH3NH2
`H20
`Base
`Acid
`Conjugate
`methylamine water
`Acid
`methylammionium ion
`
`eOH
`
`Conjugate
`Base
`
`hydroxide ion
`
`Note that when an acidic functional group loses its
`proton often referred to as having undergone dissocia
`is left with an extra electron and becomes nega
`tion it
`tively charged This is the ionized form of the acid The
`ability of the ionized functional group to participate in an
`ion-dipole interaction with water see the Water Solubility
`enhances its water solubility Many
`of Drugs section
`functional groups behave as acids Table 2.1 The ability
`to recognize these functional groups and their relative
`acid strengths helps to predict absorption distribution
`excretion and potential
`incompatibilities between drugs
`When
`basic functional group is converted
`to the
`ton becomes ionized
`corresponding conjugate acid it
`In this instance however the functional group becomes
`positively charged due to the extra proton Most drugs
`that contain basic functional groups contain primary
`secondary and tertiary amines or imino amines such
`as guanidines and amidines Other functional groups
`that are basic are shown in Table 2.2 As with the acidic
`to become familiar with these
`groups it
`is important
`functional groups and their relative strengths
`Functional groups that cannot give up or accept
`pro-
`ton are considered to be neutral or nonelectrolytes
`to their acidbase properties Common
`with respect
`
`ketone neutral
`
`halogen
`neutral
`
`aryl amine
`weak base
`
`alkyl amine
`basic
`
`carboxylic acid
`
`aryl amine weak base
`
`FIGURE 2.4 Chemical structure of ciprofloxacin showing the van-
`ous organic functional groups
`
`groups are shown
`neutral
`functional
`in Table 2.3
`uaternary ammonium compounds are neither acidic
`nor basic and are not electrically neutral Additional
`information about the acidbase properties of the func
`tional groups listed in Tables 2.1 through 2.3 can be
`and Lemke 10 Review of func
`found in Gennaro
`tional groups and their acidbase properties can also
`be found at www.duq.edu/pharmacy/faculty/harrold/
`basic-concepts-in-medicinal-chemistry.cfm
`molecule can
`contain multiple functional groups
`with acidbase properties and therefore can
`possess
`both acidic and basic character For example ciproflox
`acm Fig 2.4
`antibacterial agent
`fluoroquinolone
`contains
`secondary alkylamine two tertiary arylamines
`aniline-like amines and
`carboxylic acid The two aryl
`amines are weakly basic and therefore do not contribute
`significantly to the acidbase properties of ciprofloxacin
`under physiologic conditions Depending on the pH of
`the physiologic environment
`this molecule will either
`donate
`proton secondary alkylamine
`proton
`accept
`carboxylic acid or both Thus it
`is described as ampho
`teric both acidic and basic in nature Figure 2.5 shows
`the acidbase behavior of ciprofloxacin in two different
`given pH e.g pH 1.0 to
`environments Note that at
`3.5 only one of the functional groups the alkylamine
`is significantly ionized To be able to make this predic
`tion an appreciation for the relative acidbase strength
`ofboth the acidic and basic functional groups is required
`Thus one needs to know which acidic or basic functional
`group within molecule containing multiple functional
`groups is the strongest and which acidic or basic func
`tional group is the weakest The concept of pK not only
`describes relative acidbase strength of functional groups
`
`NXH-NJ
`
`H-N
`
`Stomach pH .03.5
`
`Colon pH 5.67
`
`FIGURE 2.5
`Predominate forms of ciprofloxacin at two different
`locations within the gastrointestinal
`
`tract
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 10/38
`
`

`
`CHAPTER
`
`DRUG DESIGN AND RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL GROUPS TO PHARMACOLOGIC ACTIVITY
`
`Acid strength increases as one moves down the table
`
`given pH the rela
`but also allows one to calculate for
`tive percentages of the ionized and un-ionized forms of
`the drug As stated earlier this helps to predict
`relative
`water solubility absorption and excretion for
`compound
`
`given
`
`Relative Acid Strength PKa
`Strong acids and bases coilipletely doiiate dissociate
`or accept
`proton in aqueous solution to produce their
`respective conjugate bases and acids For example mm-
`eral acids such as hydrochloric acid HC1 or bases such
`as sodium hydroxide NaOH undergo 100% dissocia
`tion in water with the equilibrium between the ionized
`and un-ionized forms shifted completely to the right
`ionized as shown in Equations 2.3 and 2.4
`
`Eq 2.3
`
`HC1 H20
`
`Cl H3O
`
`Eq 2.4
`
`NaOH H20
`
`Na OH H20
`
`Acids and bases of intermediate or weak strength
`however
`incompletely donate dissociate or accept
`proton and the equilibrium between the ionized and
`un-ionized forms lies somewhere
`in the middle such
`that all possible species can exist at any given time Note
`in Equations 2.3 and 2.4 water acts as
`base in
`that
`one instance and as an acid in the other Water
`is there-
`fore amphotericthat
`base
`is it can act as an acid or
`depending on the prcvailing pH of the solution From
`physiologic perspective drug molecules are always
`dilute aqueous solution The strongest base
`present as
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 11/38
`
`

`
`34
`
`PART
`
`PRINCIPLES OF DRUG DISCOVERY
`
`TABLE
`
`Common Basic Organic Functional Groups and Their Ionized Conjugate Acid Forms
`
`is OH and the strongest acid is H3O
`that is present
`This is known as the leveling effect of water Thus
`some functional groups that have acidic or basic charac
`ter do not behave as such under physiologic conditions
`in aqueous solution For example alkyl alcohols such
`1s ethyl 1eo1io1 are not sufficiently acidic to hecnme
`significantly ionized in an aqueous solution at
`physi
`ologically pH Water
`is not sufficiently basic to remove
`the proton from ethyl alcohol
`to form the ethoxide ion
`
`Eq 2.5 Therefore under phsiologic conditions alco
`to acidbase properties
`hols are neutral with respect
`
`Eq 2.5
`
`CH3CHOH HCH3CH2O H3O
`
`Predicting the Degree of onization of Molecule
`and or basic func
`there are acidic
`By knowing if
`in molecule one can predict
`tional groups present
`
`TABLE
`
`Common Organic Functional Groups That are Considered Neutral UnderPhysiologic Condutons
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 12/38
`
`

`
`CHAPTER 2/ DRUG DESIGN AND RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL GROUPS TO PHARMACOLOGIC ACTIVITY
`
`35
`
`OO OO
`
`HNyNH
`
`HNyN
`
`OO
`
`HN
`
`Acid form
`
`PKa8.O
`
`Conjugate base
`
`Question At
`
`pH of 7.4 what
`amobarbital
`
`is the percent
`
`ionization of
`
`Answer
`
`8.0
`
`7.4
`
`log
`
`0.6 log
`
`1006
`
`3.98
`
`acid form
`
`3.98
`
`00
`
`4.98
`
`FIGURE 2.6
`ionization of amobarbital
`Calculation of percent
`Calculation indicates that 8o% of the molecules are in the acid
`or protonated form leaving 20% in the conjugate base ionized
`form
`
`as
`
`result of an unequal sharing of electrons between
`covalent bond This unequal shar
`the two atoms within
`ing of electrons only occurs when these two atoms have
`significantly different electronegativities When
`per-
`manent dipole is present
`partial charge is associated
`
`OH
`
`NH2
`
`11_%1_L
`CH3
`
`Base form
`
`OH
`
`NH3
`
`ç%1
`
`CH3
`
`Conjugate acid form
`PKa9.4
`
`Question What
`is the
`pH 7.4
`
`ionization of phenylpropanolamine at
`
`Answer
`
`9.4
`
`7.4
`
`log
`
`log
`
`2.0
`
`02
`
`00
`
`1x011
`
`ionization
`
`FIGURE 2.7
`ionization of phenylpropanol
`Calculation of percent
`amine Calculation indicates that 99% of the molecules are in the
`acid form which is the same as the percent ionization
`
`whether molecule is going to be predominantly ion-
`given pH To be able to quanti
`ized or un-ionized at
`the degree of ionization of molecule
`tatively predict
`the pK values of each of the acidic and basic func
`tional groups pi eseiit and the pH of
`the environ-
`in which the molecule will be located must be
`ment
`known The magnitude of the pK value is measure
`of relative acid or base strength and the Henderson-
`Hasselbalch equation Eq 2.6 can be used to calculate
`given pH
`compound at
`ionization of
`the percent
`this equation was used to calculate the major forms of
`ciprofloxacin in Fig 2.5
`
`Eq 2.6
`
`PKa
`
`pH log
`
`form
`form
`
`The key to understanding the use of the Henderson-
`Hasselbalch equation for calculating percent
`ionization
`constant pK to
`is to realize that this equation relates
`the ratio of the acidic form of
`functional group to its
`conjugate base form and conversely the conjugate acid
`form to its base Because pK is
`constant
`for any given
`functional group the ratio of acid to conjugate base or
`conjugate acid to base will determine the pH of the solu
`sample calculation is shown in Figure 2.6 for the
`tion
`sedative hypnotic amobarbital
`When dealing with
`basic functional group one
`must recognize the conjugate
`acid represents the ion-
`ized form of the functional group Figure 2.7 shows
`ionization for the decongestant
`the calculated percent
`phenylpropanolamine
`to under-
`is very important
`base the p1 refers to the conjugate
`stand that for
`acid or ionized form of the compound To thoroughly
`the percent
`comprehend this relationship calculate
`group and
`ionization of an acidic functional
`basic
`functional group at different pH values and carefully
`observe the trend
`
`It
`
`Water Solubility of Drugs
`The solubility of di ug molecule iii watei gi eatly affects
`the routes of administration that are available as well as
`its absorption distribution and elimination Two key
`concepts to keep in mind when considering the water or
`fat solubility of molecule are the potential
`for hydro
`gen bond formation and ionization of one or more func
`tional groups within the molecule
`
`Hydrogen Bonds
`Each functional group capable of donating or accepting
`hydrogen bond contributes to the overall water solu
`bility of the compound and increases the hydrophilic
`water-loving nature of the molecule Conversely func
`form hydrogen bonds do not
`tional groups that cannot
`enhance hydrophilicity and will contribute to the hydro
`phobic water-fearing nature ofthe molecule Hydrogen
`bonds are
`special case ofwhat are usually referred to as
`dipoledipole interactions
`permanent dipole occurs
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2126 - 13/38
`
`

`
`36
`
`PART
`
`PRINCIPLES OF DRUG DISCOVERY
`
`into the pharmacy com
`long-distance truck driver comes
`plaining of seasonal allergies He asks you to recommend an
`that will act as an antihistamine but that will not cause
`agent
`drowsiness He regularly takes TUMS for indigestion due to the
`bad food that he eats while on the road
`
`The intravenoLis
`
`IV technician in the hospital pharmacy gets
`the two drugs drawn below
`an order for
`that includes
`patient
`She is unsure ifshe can mix the two drugs together in the same IV
`bag and is not certain how water soluble the agents are
`
`OCOOH
`
`I__
`
`cS
`
`Cetirizine Zyrtec
`
`Clemastine Tavist
`
`CICOOH
`
`Olopatadine

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket