Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!2!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6543
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 12-030 (RGA) (SRF)
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`))))))))))
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS SIERRA
`C5>171?? -81>5/- 59/)a? -90 ?51>>- C5>171?? 59/)a?
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`Thomas C. Grimm (#1098)
`Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
`1201 N. Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`tgrimm@mnat.com
`jtigan@mnat.com
`Attorneys for Defendants Sierra Wireless
`America, Inc and Sierra Wireless Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Robert E. Krebs
`Jennifer Hayes
`Christopher M. Mooney
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`2 Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2106
`(650) 320-7700
`
`Ronald F. Lopez
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 984-8200
`
`Confidential Version Filed: July 10, 2015
`Public Version Filed: July 23, 2015
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 1
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!3!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6544
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................................................ ..ii
`
`NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS .............................................................................. 1
`
`SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................... 1
`
`STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS ................................................................................... 2
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`x./. M>QBKQ >PPBOQBA CLAIMS................................................................................ 2
`
`vMOLDO>JJ>?IB FKQBOC>@Bw >KA @LOOBPMLKAFNG ACCUSED
`INTERFACES .................................................................................................................... 3
`
`vMOL@BPPFKD JLARIBw .............................................................................................. 5
`
`vJBJLOV JLARIBw..................................................................................................... 6
`
`vMBOJFQQBA @>IIBOPw AND ADMISSION OF NON-INFRINGEMENT................ 6
`
`ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................................. 7
`
`VI.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.................................................... 7
`
`VII. NON INFRINGEMENT OF vMOLDO>JJ>?IB FKQBOC>@Bw ................................. 7
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`No literal Infringement The Accused Interfaces Are Not Directly
`Programmable......................................................................................................... 8
`
`No Infringement under Doctrine of Equivalents The Accused Interfaces
`Are Not Directly Programmable........................................................................... 11
`
`VIII. PLAINTIFF HAS ADMITTED THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS DO NOT
`FKCOFKDB QEB vMBOJFQQBA @>IIBOPw IFJFQ>QION......................................... 12
`
`CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................. 13
`
`- i
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 2
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!4!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6545
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`Page(s)
`
`FEDERAL CASES
`
`Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Global ID Sys.,
`29 F. App'x 598 (Fed. Cir. 2002).............................................................................................12
`
`Bai v. L & L Wings, Inc.,
`160F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 1998)...................................................................................................7
`
`Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc.,
`138 F.3d 1448 (Fed. Cir. 1998)..................................................................................................7
`
`Freedman Seating Co. v. Am. Seating Co.,
`420 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2005)................................................................................................11
`
`Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.,
`475 U.S. 574 (1986)...................................................................................................................7
`
`PSN Illinois, LLC v. Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc.,
`525 F.3d 1159 (Fed. Cir. 2008)..................................................................................................7
`
`Telemac Cellular Corp. v. Topp Telecom, Inc.,
`247 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2001)..................................................................................................7
`
`U.S. Phillips Corp. v. Iwasaki Elec. Co. Ltd.,
`505 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2007)..................................................................................................7
`
`Voda v. Cordis Corp.,
`536 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2008)................................................................................................11
`
`Zygo Corp. v. Wyko Corp.,
`79 F.3d 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1996)..................................................................................................11
`
`RULES
`
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) ........................................................................................................................7
`
`- ii -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 3
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!5!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6546
`
`q wxuh qg vw jh ri surfhhglqjv
`
`This Court issued claim construction orders on November 19, 2013, and January 30, 2014
`
`(D.I. 104, 113), and fact discovery and expert discovery have closed. Defendants Sierra
`
`Taj]d]kk Ff[, Yf\ Pa]jjY Taj]d]kk >e]ja[Y* Ff[, ([gdd][lan]dq* vPa]jjY Taj]d]kkw) fgo egn] ^gj
`
`Summary Judgment of Non-Ff^jaf_]e]fl g^ Rfal]\ PlYl]k MYl]fl Kg, 6*.72*./. (vl‘] x./.
`
`MYl]flw)* l‘] gfdq j]eYafaf_ MYl]fl-In-Suit.
`
`vxpp u| ri ujxphqw
`
`Sierra Wireless moves for summary judgment of non-infringement of the x./. MYl]fl
`
`because none of the Accused Products af[dm\] Y vhjg_jYeeYZd] afl]j^Y[]w l‘Yl ak \aj][ldq
`
`programmable. Rather, it is undisputed that when commands are sent to the Accused Products,
`
`the microprocessor first processes and executes the commands, and only then does the
`
`microprocessor itself send control signals to indirectly configure basic settings on the interfaces
`
`Y[[mk]\ g^ af^jaf_]e]fl (vl‘] >[[mk]\ Ffl]j^Y[]kw),
`
`Q‘ak ak fgl vdirectly hjg_jYeeaf_w gj directly performing any operation on or by the
`
`>[[mk]\ Ffl]j^Y[]k, Bn]f MdYafla^^yk ]ph]jl* Aj, K]lld]lgf* has plainly admitted that
`
`the
`
`afl]j^Y[]k gfdq vaf\aj][ldqw j][]an] l‘] >Q [geeYf\k, Q‘]j]^gj]* al ak fgl \akhml]\ l‘Yl l‘]j] ak
`
`no way to program, configure, or otherwise change settings on the Accused Interfaces directly
`
`an element required by all the Asserted Claims as construed by the Court. Accordingly, because
`
`the Accused Products cannot perform this function required by the claims, they do not infringe.
`
`Sierra Wireless also moves for summary judgment of non-af^jaf_]e]fl gf l‘] vh]jeall]\
`
`[Ydd]jkw daealYlagf ZYk]\ gf MdYafla^^yk Y\eakkagfk l‘Yl Pa]jjY Taj]d]kkyk >[[mk]\ Mjg\m[lk \g fgl
`
`infringe that limitation. Accordingly, Plaintiff cannot meet its burden to prove infringement.
`
`- 1 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 4
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!6!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6547
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 5
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!7!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6548
`
`a memory module for storing the at least one
`telephone number or IP address from the
`authenticated transmission as one of one or
`more permitted callers
`if
`the processing
`module
`authenticates
`the
`at
`least
`one
`transmission by determining that the at least
`one transmission includes the coded number;
`
`wherein the programmable communicator
`device uses a memory module for storing the
`at least one telephone number or IP address
`from the authenticated transmission as one of
`one or more permitted callers
`if
`the
`processing module authenticates the at least
`one transmission by determining that the at
`least one transmission includes the coded
`number;
`
`Because the remaining Asserted Claims depend from these claims, they all include the
`
`limitations of claims 1 and 52 at issue. Accordingly, if the Court determines that Sierra Wireless
`
`does not infringe one of these three limitations, then Sierra Wireless would not infringe any of
`
`the Asserted claims.
`
`II.
`
`^=>;3>-88-.71 59@1>2-/1_ -90 /;>>1?=;905NG ACCUSED
`INTERFACES
`
`>dd g^ l‘] >kk]jl]\ @dYaek af[dm\] Y vhjg_jYeeYZd] afl]j^Y[]w daealYlagf [gfkljm]\ Zq
`
`l‘] @gmjl Yk8 vYf afl]j^Y[] that is able to be directly hjg_jYee]\,w A,F, //1 Yl 1, Q‘] @gmjl Ydkg
`
`fgl]\ l‘Yl vyhjg_jYeeYZd]y ak _]f]jYddq mf\]jklgg\ af l‘] Yjl lg e]Yf xW[XYhYZd] g^ Y[[]hlaf_
`
`afkljm[lagfk ^gj h]j^gjeaf_ Y lYkc gj Yf gh]jYlagf,yw A,F, 7/ Yl //, , Q‘] gfdq j]^]j]fce in the
`
`l]pl g^ l‘] kh][a^a[Ylagf gl‘]j l‘Yf l‘] [dYaek lg vY hjg_jYeeYZd] afl]j^Y[]w ak l‘] ^gddgoaf_
`
`short passage:
`
`An SMS alarm generation means 70 is provided to work together with a
`battery charge monitor 35 and a sensor means 80 and an alarm message
`list 120 and a programmable interface means 140 to generate alarm
`messages in response to changes in status conditions. Said programmable
`interface means may be attached to all manner of sensor devices for the
`purpose of
`relaying data from external devices and sensor either
`automatically or in response to a request for information from a remote
`device.
`
`Ex. A, x./. MYl]fl* 6832
`
`62. (emphasis added). Plaintiff asserted that each of the Accused
`
`Products infjaf_]k l‘] vhjg_jYeeYZd] afl]j^Y[]w daealYlagf Z][Ymk] al ‘Yk Yl d]Ykl gf] g^ l‘]k]
`
`- 3 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 6
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!8!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6549
`
`klYf\Yj\ ]d][ljgfa[ hgjlk8 (/) Y k]jaYd (],_, vR>OQw) hgjl* (0) Y D]f]jYd Mmjhgk] F-L haf hgjl
`
`(vDMFLw)* (1) Yf >fYdg_ lg Aa_alYd @gfn]jl]j (v>A@w) hgjl* gj (2) Y Rfan]jkYd Serial Bus
`
`(vRP?w), See, e.g., Ex. B, Infr. Cont. Appdx., Apr. 8, 2013, Fastrack Chart at 2, Fastrak Xtend
`
`Chart at 2, GL61x0 Chart at 2, Q26 Chart at 2, Q2600 Chart at 3, Q64 Chart at 2, Q24 Chart at 2,
`
`Q2400 Chart at 1, Q52 Omni Chart at 2, SL6087 Chart at 2, SL808x Chart at 2, WMP Chart at 2.
`
`MdYafla^^ Ydkg [gfl]f\k l‘] >[[mk]\ Ffl]j^Y[]k Yj] vhjg_jYeeYZd] naY >Q [geeYf\k l‘Yl af[dm\]
`
`WnYjagmk >Q [geeYf\kXw Yf\ daklk gml ]pYehd] >Q [geeYf\k ^gj ]Y[‘ >[[mk]\ Mjg\m[l,
`
`Id.
`
`>[[gj\af_dq* l‘] gfdq ZYkak MdYafla^^ ‘Yk hjgna\]\ ^gj af^jaf_]e]fl g^ l‘] vhjg_jYeeYZd]
`
`afl]j^Y[]w daealYlagf ak l‘] \]dan]jq g^ >Q [geeYf\k lg l‘] >[[mk]\ Mjg\m[lk l‘Yl Yj] Ydd]_]\dq
`
`received by the Accused Interfaces. Id.
`
`- 4 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 7
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!9!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!654;
`
`III.
`
`^=>;/1??593 8;0A71_
`
`>dd g^ l‘] >kk]jl]\ @dYaek af[dm\] Y vhjg[]kkaf_ eg\md]w daealYlagf [gfkljm]\ Zq l‘]
`
`@gmjl Yk8 v[gehgf]flk gj mfalk g^ Y [gehml]j hjg_jYe,w A,F, //1 Yl 1, Q‘] gfdq j]^]j]f[] af l‘]
`
`l]pl g^ l‘] kh][a^a[Ylagf gl‘]j l‘Yf l‘] [dYaek lg vY hjg[]kkaf_ eg\md]w ak l‘] ^gddgoaf_ k‘gjl
`
`passage:
`
`The programmable communicator comprises a processing module, which
`can receive information about its wrist strap or associated attachment. In
`the embodiment of a smart clothes tag, the said associated attachment may
`comprise a fibre or wire, which,
`if mechanically pulled, causes the
`generation of an alarm message. Clearly, in the case of a wrist worn
`communicator, the opening or closing of the wrist strap may be used to
`activate an electronic circuit to generate a status condition of the wrist
`strap. It is anticipated that the receiver of the alarm message may then call
`the child directly, if possible, to check if there is a problem. Additionally,
`location based services may be used to locate the position of the
`communicator relative to the network infrastructure.
`
`Ex. A, x./. MYl]fl* /.833-65. Accordingly, other than that mentioned in the claims, the x./.
`
`MYl]fl gfdq \]k[jaZ]k l‘Yl l‘] hjg[]kkaf_ eg\md] [Yf vj][]anW]X af^gjeYlagf YZgml alk ojakl kljYh
`
`gj Ykkg[aYl]\ YllY[‘e]fl,w Id.
`
`Furthermore, the claims of the x./. MYl]fl \g fgl hjgna\] Yfq Y\\alagfYd \]lYadk g^ l‘]
`
`vhjg[]kkaf_ eg\md]w Z]qgf\ ‘a_‘ d]n]d ^mf[lagfk al eYq h]j^gje, Cgj afklYf[]* l‘] [dYaek gfdy
`
`af\a[Yl] l‘] hjg[]kkaf_ eg\md] eYq h]j^gje l‘] ^mf[lagfk g^8 vYml‘]fla[Ylaf_ Y ljYfkeakkagfw
`
`(@dYaek /
`
`30)* v\]l]jeafaf_ a^ l‘] Yl d]Ykl gf] ljYfkeakkagf [gflYafk l‘] [g\]\ fmeZ]jw
`
`(Claims 1 & 52) vhjg[]kkWaf_X j][]an]\ \YlYw (@dYae /0)* vljYfkeallWaf_] to the at least one
`
`egfalgjaf_ \]na[]w (@dYae /3)* v\]l]jeafWaf_X o‘]l‘]j l‘] \YlY j]im]kl af[dm\]k l‘] j]imaj]\
`
`Y[[]kk [g\]w (@dYae /4)* Yf\ kaeadYj ‘a_‘ d]n]d ^mf[lagfk, Bp, >* x./. MYl]fl,
`
`- 5 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 8
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!;!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6551
`
`IV.
`
`^818;>D 8;0A71_
`
`>dd g^ l‘] >kk]jl]\ @dYaek af[dm\] Y ve]egjq eg\md]w daealYlagf l‘Yl ‘Yk fgl Z]]f
`
`construed by the Court.
`
`See A,F, //1, Ll‘]j l‘Yf l‘] [dYaek* ve]egjq eg\md]w ak fgl
`
`mentioned once in the text of the specification of the x./. MYl]fl* Ydl‘gm_‘ l‘]j] ak Y k‘gjl
`
`e]flagf g^ ve]egjq e]Yfkw8
`
`It is a further object of the present invention to provide a programmable
`communications apparatus, which has a memory means to store sound as
`a sound byte for a certain period of time such as the voice of the child
`wearing the programmable communicator and the means to send this
`sound to the telephone number to which the said apparatus is linked.
`
`Ex. A, x./. MYl]fl* 3801-29, >\\alagfYddq* l‘] >ZkljY[l \ak[dgk]k Y ve]egjq [gf^a_mj]\ lg klgj]
`
`l]d]h‘gf] fmeZ]jk gj FM Y\\j]kk]k,w Bp, >* x./. MYl]fl* >ZkljY[l,
`
`The claims of the x./. MYl]fl \g fgl hjgna\] Yfq Y\\alagfYd \]lYadk g^ l‘] vhjg[]kkaf_
`
`eg\md]w Z]qgf\ ‘a_‘ d]n]d ^mf[lagfk al eYq h]j^gje, Cgj afklYf[]* [dYaek / Yf\ 30 af\a[Yl] l‘]
`
`ve]egjq eg\md]w eYq h]j^gje l‘] ^mf[lagf g^ vklgjaf_ t WYX l]d]h‘gf] fmeZ]j gj FM Y\\j]kk
`
`. . . Yk gf] g^ gf] gj egj] h]jeall]\ [Ydd]jk,w Bp, >* x./. MYl]fl* [dYaek / Yf\ 30,
`
`V.
`
`^=1>85@@10 /-771>?_ AND ADMISSION OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
`
`Q‘] @gmjl ‘Yk [gfkljm]\ l‘] vh]jeall]\ [Ydd]jw daealYlagf lg e]Yf vY l]d]hhone number or
`
`IP address on a list of numbers that are designated to cause the programmable communicator to
`
`Y[[]hl Yf af[geaf_ [Ydd j][]an]\ ^jge l‘Yl fmeZ]j,w A,F, //1 Yl 0, MdYafla^^ ‘Yk Y\eall]\ l‘Yl
`
`Pa]jjY Taj]d]kkyk >[[mk]\ Mjg\m[lk [Yffgl af^jaf_] l‘] vh]jeall]\ [Ydd]jkw daealYlagf mf\]j l‘ak
`
`construction. Bp, B* AjY^l Plah, Yl 1 (vF^ l‘] @gmjlyk [gfkljm[lagf g^ l‘] l]je xh]jeall]\ [Ydd]jy ak
`
`[gjj][l* l‘] MdYafla^^ [gf[]\]k l‘Yl Pa]jjY Taj]d]kkyk Y[[mk]\ hjg\m[lk
`
`1 as sold to customers
`
`1
`
`The Accused Products are the Fastrack Supreme 10, Fastrack Supreme 20, Fastrack
`Xtend Edge (FXT009), Fastrack Xtend HSPA (FXT003), Fastrack Xtend HSPA
`
`- 6 -
`
`(Continued . . . )
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 9
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!21!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6552
`
`cannot directly or indirectly infringe any claim of the y./. hYl]fl (dal]jYddq gj mf\]j l‘] \g[ljaf]
`
`g^ ]imanYd]flkw),
`
`VI.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`ujxphqw
`
`Summary judgment is proper in a patent infringement case, as in any other case, when
`
`there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of
`
`law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); PSN Illinois, LLC v. Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc., 525 F.3d 1159, 1168
`
`(Fed. Cir. 2008). There is no material fact dispute and thus summary judgment is appropriate if
`
`vl‘] j][gj\ lYc]f Yk Y o‘gd] [gmd\ fgl d]Y\ Y jYlagfYd lja]j g^ ^Y[l lg ^af\ ^gj l‘] fgf-moving
`
`hYjlq,w Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986).
`
`VII. NON INFRINGEMENT OF ^=>;3>-88-.71 59@1>2-/1_
`
`An infringement analysis is a two-step process. Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc.,
`
`138 F.3d 1448, 1454 (Fed. Cir. 1998). First, the court determines the scope and meaning of the
`
`patent claims as a matter of law.
`
`Id. Then, the claims are compared to the accused device to
`
`determine whether all of the claim limitations are present, either literally or by a substantial
`
`equivalent. Id. The absence of any single limitation compels a finding of non-infringement. Bai
`
`v. L & L Wings, Inc.,160 F.3d 1350, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 1998). Summary judgment in patent
`
`infringement cases is appropriate when it is apparent that only one conclusion as to infringement
`
`could be reached by a reasonable jury. See Telemac Cellular Corp. v. Topp Telecom, Inc.,
`
`(. . . continued)
`(FX100), GL6100, GL6100SM4, GL1100, Q26 Extreme, Q2866, Q2866 Refreshed,
`Q2687, Q2687 Refreshed, Q2687 Classic, Q2698, Q64, Q24 Auto with MMS, Q24 Auto
`with UFL, Q24 Classic, Q24 Extended, Q24 Plus, Q24NG, Q2426-AMR, Q2426-SK,
`Q52 Omni, SL6087, SL6087US, SL6087B, SL8080, SL8080B, SL8080T, SL8081,
`WMP50, WMP100, WMP150.
`
`- 7 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 10
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!22!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6553
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 11
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!23!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6554
`
`- 9 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 12
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!24!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6555
`
`- 10 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 13
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!25!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6556
`
`B.
`
`No Infringement under Doctrine of Equivalents ] The Accused Interfaces
`Are Not Directly Programmable
`
`Cmjl‘]jegj]* l‘] >[[mk]\ Ffl]j^Y[]k Yj] fgl v\aj][ldq hjg_jYee]\w under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents. vFf^jaf_]e]fl eYq fgl Z] ^gmf\ mf\]j l‘] \g[ljaf] g^ equivalents if a limitation is
`
`eakkaf_* l‘Yl ak* fgl j]hdY[]\ oal‘ Yf ]imanYd]fl kmZklalm]fl,w Zygo Corp. v. Wyko Corp., 79 F.3d
`
`1563, 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1996).
`
`v>f ]d]e]fl af l‘] Y[[mk]\ \]na[]k ak ]imanYd]fl lg Y [dYae
`
`daealYlagf a^ al xh]j^gjek kmZklYflaYddq l‘] kYe] ^mf[lagf af kmZklYflaYddq l‘] kYe] oYq lg gZlYaf
`
`kmZklYflaYddq l‘] kYe] j]kmdl,yw Voda v. Cordis Corp., 536 F.3d 1311, 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
`
`(internal citation omitted).
`
`Under the all-]d]e]flk jmd]* vYf Y[[mk]\ hjg\m[l gj hjg[]kk ak fgl af^jaf_af_ mfd]kk al
`
`contains each limitatagf g^ l‘] [dYae* ]al‘]j dal]jYddq gj Zq Yf ]imanYd]fl,w Freedman Seating Co.
`
`v. Am. Seating Co., 420 F.3d 1350, 1356 (C]\, @aj, 0..3), vW>Xf ]d]e]fl g^ Yf Y[[mk]\ hjg\m[l
`
`or process is not, as a matter of law, equivalent to a limitation of the claimed invention if such a
`
`^af\af_ ogmd\ ]flaj]dq nalaYl] l‘] daealYlagf,w Id. (citing Warner Jenkinson, 520 U.S. at 29, 117
`
`S. Ct. 1040).
`
`- 11 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 14
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!26!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6557
`
`VIII. PLAINTIFF HAS ADMITTED THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS DO NOT
`592>5931 @41 ^=1>85@TED CAL71>?_ 7585@-@5;9
`
`Admissions on the issue of infringement can bar a party from raising a genuine issue of
`
`material fact, warranting summary judgment. Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Global ID Sys.,
`
`29 C, >hhyp 376* 4./ (C]\, @aj, 0..0) (vaf da_‘l g^ l‘] \]]e]\ Y\eakkagfk* DFAP ak mfYZd] lg
`
`jYak] Y ljaYZd] akkm] g^ ^Y[l oal‘ j]kh][l lg daYZadalqw), As discussed above, Plaintiff has admitted
`
`l‘Yl Pa]jjY Taj]d]kkyk >[[mk]\ Mjg\m[lk \g fgl af^jaf_] l‘] vM]jeall]\ @Ydd]jkw daealYlagf,
`
`Ex. B* AjY^l Plah, Yl 1 (vF^ l‘] @gmjlyk [gfkljm[lagf g^ l‘] l]je xh]jeall]\ [Ydd]jy ak [gjj][l* l‘]
`
`Plaintiff concedes that SierjY Taj]d]kkyk Y[[mk]\ hjg\m[lk Yk kgd\ lg [mklge]jk [Yffgl \aj][ldq gj
`
`indirectly infringe any claim of the y./. hYl]fl (dal]jYddq gj mf\]j l‘] \g[ljaf] g^ ]imanYd]flkw),
`
`Accordingly, based on this admission, Plaintiff cannot meet its burden to prove infringement of
`
`this limitation. Accordingly, Sierra Wireless respectfully requests the Court grant summary
`
`judgment on this issue so that it may be preserved for appeal.
`
`- 12 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 15
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!27!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6558
`
`frqfoxvlrq
`
`For the reasons stated above, Sierra Wireless respectfully requests that its Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of the asserted claims of the x./. MYl]fl Z] _jYfl]\,
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Robert E. Krebs
`Jennifer Hayes
`Christopher M. Mooney
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`2 Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2106
`(650) 320-7700
`
`Ronald F. Lopez
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 984-8200
`
`July 10, 2015
`9299709
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`"," %’*)&, # $+())
`Thomas C. Grimm (#1098)
`Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
`1201 N. Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`tgrimm@mnat.com
`jtigan@mnat.com
`Attorneys for Defendants Sierra Wireless
`America, Inc and Sierra Wireless Inc.
`
`- 13 -
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 16
`
`

`
`Ecug!2<23.ex.11141.TIC!!!Fqewogpv!2;2!!!Hkngf!18034026!!!Rcig!28!qh!28!RcigKF!$<!6559
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 10, 2015, I caused the foregoing to be electronically
`
`filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such
`
`filing to all registered participants.
`
`Additionally, I hereby certify that true and correct copies of the foregoing were
`
`caused to be served on July 10, 2015 upon the following individuals in the manner indicated:
`
`BY E-MAIL
`
`Richard D. Kirk
`Stephen B. Brauerman
`BAYARD, P.A.
`rkirk@bayardlaw.com
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com
`
`Marc N. Henschke
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`Boston, MA 02199
`mhenschke@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey N. Costakos
`Kimberly K. Dodd
`Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Matthew J. Shin
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`Milwaukee, WI 53202
`jcostakos@foley.com
`kdodd@foley.com
`kjelenchick@foley.com
`mshin@foley.com
`
`Jason J. Keener
`Jeffrey J. Mikrut
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`Chicago, IL 60654-5313
`jkeener@foley.com
`jmikrut@foley.com
`
`"," %’*)&, # $+())
`Thomas C. Grimm (#1098)
`
`Sierra Wireless EX 1019 p 17