throbber
742 Proc. roy. Soc. Med. Volume 66 August 1973
`
`(3) Diminished fibrinolytic properties of the blood
`which would promote fibrin deposition and
`enhance fibrin deposition and clotting.
`
`This tendency to abnormal stasis and clotting
`of blood in the superficial dermal venules in
`acrocyanosis (Crocq 1896) and the resulting
`alteration in the anatomy of the blood vessels in
`the upper dermis can explain the associated signs
`of micropapular chilblains (erythema pernio
`papulosum, Haxthausen 1930, Hutchinson 1878),
`pink cinnabar spots (Stem 1937), and reticular
`patterning (Estes 1956). Micropapular chilblains
`are visible on the skin when the clotting has
`affected a sufficiently large cluster of microvessels.
`
`Since Sir Thomas Lewis (1927), many have
`tried to explain the signs of acrocyanosis on the
`basis of: functional disorder of some segment of
`acral blood vessels whether arterial, capillary or
`venous; pharmacological oddity of the cutaneous
`nerves, their endings or responses; a perversion
`of the action of vasoactive and other agents in the
`skin; occult immunological irregularities; and
`other physiological and pathological peculiarities.
`Burch & Phillips (1963), exhaustively reviewing
`all these writings, concluded that the signs could
`not be satisfactorily explained on such grounds
`alone.
`
`I postulate that the signs in the skin of acro-
`cyanosis or micropapular chilblains are merely
`different degrees of the same disorder. They
`result from an accentuation of the normal features
`of healthy whole blood flow, mainly stasis and
`clotting on exposure to cold. In these conditions
`the hyperviscosity of the blood allows clotting to
`occur only in the cutaneous microvessels exposed
`to the cold.
`
`The disease, then, results from an intravascular
`defect rather than a blood vessel or skin disorder
`in the first instance. This blood coagulation
`disorder is probably not a simple matter but the
`result of a complex and interrelated series of
`defects. It only involves the skin and affects no
`other organs because they are at body tempera-
`ture. If it were not for the special circumstances
`of its exposure to surface chilling in the skin
`microvessels, the blood's defects would have
`been sufficiently minor to have escaped detection.
`REFERENCES
`Burch G F & Phillips J {1963) In: Handbook ofPhysiology:
`Section 2. Ed. W F Hamilton. American Physiological
`Society, Washington; 1,1230-32
`CopemanPWM
`{1970) British Journal of Dermatology 81, Suppl. 5, 5 I
`Copeman P WM & Ryan T J
`(1971) British Journal of Dermatology 85, 205
`Croeq C {1896) Semalne midicale (Paris) lei, 298
`Estes J (19S6) Motkrn Concepts of Cardiovascular Disease 15, 355
`Haxtbauaen H (1930) Cold in Relation to
`Skin Diaeaaes. Heinemann, London; p 6S
`
`36
`
`Hutchinson J ( 1878) Lectures on Clinical Surgery Vol. I:
`On Certain Rare Diseases of the Skin. Churchill, London; p 362
`Lewis T H (1927) The Blood Vessels of the Human Skin and
`Their Responses. Shaw & Son, London
`Ryan T J & Copeman P W M
`(1969) British Journal of Dermatology 81, S63-73
`Stem S {1937) British Journal of Dermatology 49, 100-106
`Zweifach B W & Metz DB (19SS) Angiology 6, 281-290
`
`Histogenesis of the Inflammatory
`Component of Rosacea
`by R Marks sse MRCP
`(Institute of Dermatology,
`StJohn's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin,
`Lisle Street, Leicester Square, London WC2H 7 BJ)
`
`Rosacea is characterized by a wide range of
`physical signs. On the one hand is erythema and
`telangiectasia making up the vascular component,
`and on the other papules and pustules which
`constitute the inflammatory aspect of the disease.
`It is impossible to say which of these components
`is primary or even whether the inflammation and
`the vascular components are causally related.
`
`In a previous investigation it was shown that
`the hair follicles are not the initial focal points of
`the inflammation so characteristic . of papular
`rosacea(Marks & Harcourt-Webster 1969). When
`there is infiltration and disruption or even abscess
`formation in the follicular epithelium it seems to
`be a secondary process and not of fundamental
`importance in the overall biology of the disorder.
`As the inflammation does not appear to be the
`result of a follicular disorder,
`the question
`remains - what is the cause of the inflammation?
`
`Detailed examination of biopsy material from
`patients with papular rosacea has shown the
`cellular infiltrate to be predominantly distributed
`around the small blood vessels of the subpapillary
`venous plexus (Marks & Harcourt-Webster 1969).
`In addition, in disseminated rosacea there is
`pronounced vascular involvement amounting to
`a frank vasculitis in places (Marks & Wilson
`Jones 1969). Furthermore, telangiectasia and the
`cedema that is so commonly observed add to the
`suspicions that the blood vessels are more than
`incidentally affected and primary vascular involve-
`ment could be central to the pathogenesis of the
`inflammation. For these reasons, the role of small
`blood vessels in papular rosacea has been investi-
`gated in this study by histochemical and auto-
`radiographic techniques. At the same time, and
`as a corollary to the blood-vessel studies, the rate
`of proliferation and the enzyme histochemical
`characteristics of the cellular infiltrate have been
`examined.
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1035
`
`Exh. 1035
`
`

`
`37
`
`Secti011 of Dermato/ogy
`
`743
`
`Patientsand Methods
`Altogether 27 patients were studied. All had
`typical papular rosacea with a background of
`erythema and
`telangiectasia and a variable
`amount of swelling. There were 15 men and 12
`women with an average age of 52.6 years (range
`24-77). Seven patients were taking tetracycline at
`the time of biopsy; 2 had started two days pre-
`viously and the other 5 had been treated for
`periods of one to three weeks. Seven other
`patients had used topical corticosteroids for vary-
`ing periods. Biopsies were taken of papules with
`a5mmpunch.
`
`In order to identify cells about to divide by
`autoradiography, 14 papules were injected intra-
`cutaneously with tritiated thymidine. Ten papules
`were removed one hour after injection. The other
`four biopsies were removed at intervals of one,
`two, three and four days after injection. Ilford
`nuclear emulsion (K4) was used to coat the
`sections, and exposure times of two and three
`weeks were employed.
`
`To give more precision to the kinetic data of
`the cells the inflammatory infiltrate was divided
`into three main cellular types : lymphocytes,
`histiocytes and endothelial cells. The number of
`cells Iabelied in each category was counted
`(between 500 and 1000 cells of each type for every
`specimen) and expressedas a percentage (labelling
`index). Cells difficult to classify were not counted.
`
`Enzyme histochemical tests on the biopsies of
`16 patients with papular rosacea were performed
`as follows: (1) to test enzymes concerned with
`respiratory activity - NADH diaphorase, lactic
`dehydrogenase (LDH) glucose-6-phosphate de-
`hydrogenase (using the methods in Pearse 1960);
`(2) to test the integrity of the small vessel endo-
`thelium - alkaHne phosphatase (Gomori 1952),
`adenosine triphosphatase (W achstein & Meisel
`1960).
`
`Resu/ts and Comment
`Table 1 shows the mean labeHing indices for the
`three individual cell types in the ten specimens
`removed one hour after injection with tritiated
`thymidine. The overalllabelling index of 3.3% is
`high and suggests a rapid cell turnover rate (Fig
`
`Fig 1 Autoradiograph/rom biopsy of lesion ofpapu/ar
`rosacea injected one hour previously with tritiated
`thymidine. There are many Iabelied inf/ammatory
`cel/s (indicated by arrows). H&E. X 100
`
`1). Lachapelle (1972), using an in vitro method,
`found that the infiltrate in primary irritant derma-
`titis had a labelling index of 0.5% compared with
`2.5% in allergic contact dermatitis. Furthermore,
`the figure of 3.3% obtained in the present investi-
`gation is higher than the range of values given by
`Spector (1971) as being characteristic of a 'low
`turnover' granuloma (0.5-2.0 %) but below the
`value given by that author as an example of a
`high turnover granuloma(4.6%). Thehigh overall
`labelling index is presumably the result of a rapid
`rate of cell destruction but does not imply any
`particular mechanism for cell death. Similar pro-
`liferative responses have been noted by Monis
`et al. (1968) in carrageenan granulomata and by
`Epstein & Krasnabrod (1968) in silica granulo-
`mata. Any actively phagocytic infiltrate may have
`a labelling index of the same order as that
`observed in the present investigation.
`
`Table 2 sets out the values obtained for the
`labelling indices in the four biopsies removed
`between one and four days after intracutaneous
`injection with tritiated thymidine. It shows that
`there was a tendency for the total number of
`Iabelied cells to drop with increasing intervals
`from the time of injection. This observationalso
`
`Table 1
`Mean labelling indices for three cell types in ten specimens
`removed one hour after injection with tritiated thymidine
`
`Table2
`Values for labelling indices in four biopsies removed between one and
`four days alter intracutaneous injection with tritiated thymidine
`
`Gelltype
`Lymphocytes
`Histiocytes
`Endothelial cells
`Alleeiltypes
`
`Mean lahelling
`Index(%)
`3.1
`4.6
`1.3
`3.3
`
`Standard e"or
`o/mean
`0.6
`0.9
`0.3
`o.s
`
`Label/ing indicesfor cell types (%)
`Interval Lymphos. Histios. Endos. All
`1 day
`3.1
`2.8
`3.1
`3.0
`2days
`0.6
`0.3
`5,6
`2.1
`3days
`0.4
`2.4
`2.0
`1.0
`4days
`1.2
`3.1
`2.0
`1.8
`
`Exh. 1035
`
`

`
`744 Proc. roy. Soc. Med. Volume 66 August 1973
`
`38
`
`perithelial cells showed an appreciable number of
`dividing cells suggests that these vessels, though
`'irritated', were not severely damaged and retained
`the capacity for division. The small blood vessels
`were weil delineated with the adenosine triphos-
`phatase and alkaHne phosphatase enzyme histo-
`chemical tests and the mitochondrial enzyme
`reactions. This retention of enzYme reactivity also
`suggests that the small vessels were not signifi-
`cantly injured.
`From the foregoing it seems that the popula-
`tion kinetics and the histochemical characteristics
`of the infiltrate both suggest an actively phago-
`cytic role for these cells. The observations also
`imply intimate vascular participation yet absence
`of a vasculitis. This interpretation of the.data aids
`in understanding the pathogenesis of the in-
`ßammatory reaction in · rosacea ü some such
`mechanism as was suggested by HaJC.thausen
`(1930) . is invoked. He suggested that small
`cutaneous blood vessels were in some way
`damaged by exposure to ßuctuations of environ-
`mental temperature and other climatic stimuli.
`More elastotic change is found in the biopsies of
`rosacea patients than in age, sex and site-matched
`control biopsies (Marks & Rarcourt-Webster
`1969). Small vessels become dilated in elastotic
`tissue. lf these vessels were in addition in some
`way injured, for example by cold, they would also
`become leaky. In rosacea it is possible that as
`
`Fig 3 Autoradiograph showing a /arge di/ated
`thin-walled blood vesse/ with two Iabeiied
`endothelia/ ce//s (indicated by arrows).
`lf.4c-e .. >Slß5
`
`Fig 2 Autoradiograph/rom papular rosacea to show
`Iabelied cells of the histiocytic series. H & E. X 185
`implies a high rate of cell destruction in the
`infiltrate. Larger histiocytic types were Iabelied to
`a greater extent than lymphocytes in several
`specimens (Fig 2).
`Spector & ·Lykke (1966) have shown that
`in experimental granulomatous infiam.mation
`apparently well-differentiated macrophage types
`remained capable of division. All the biopsies
`examined contained !arger histiocytic types that
`reacted quite strongly in the nonspecific esterase
`reaction and were also strongly reactive for the
`NADH and LDH enzyme reactions. These posi-
`tive reactions are characteristic of functional
`phagocytic cells.
`There was a surprising degree of labelling of
`endothelial cells in the autoradiographs prepared
`from biopsy specimens injected one hour pre-
`viously with tritiated thymidine. It is difficult to
`identify endothelial cells in routine histological
`sections. However, by restricting the scoring of
`endothelial cells to spindle-shaped cells lining
`vascular spaces this diffi.culty has been at least
`partially overcome. It was found that endothelial
`cells identified in this way bad a labelling index of
`1.3% (Fig 3). There have been very few studies of
`the proliferation kinetics of vascular endothelium
`and · even ·fewer of · capillary endotheliuni in
`inflamed human skin, so that the significance of
`this finding is uncertain. Not only were endo-
`thelial cells labelled but labelled perithelial cells
`were also obvious in many of the 'one hour'
`~utora~~~~_ap!!~.· · J'f.le .f~c~ ·-t~~t -~!J.dothelial and
`
`Exh. 1035
`
`

`
`39
`
`a consequence of vessel malfunction macro-
`molecules leak into the perivascular tissues and
`attract phagocytes. Furthermore, if fibrinogen
`was amongst these macromolecules, episodes of
`inflammation would result and the pathogenesis
`of the inflammation in rosacea be explained.
`
`REFERENCES
`Epatein W L & Krasnabrod H
`(1968) Lahoratory lnvestigation 18, 190
`Gomori I (1952) International Review ofCytology 1, 323
`Haxthauaen H (1930) BritishJournal o/ Dermatology 42, 105
`LacbapeUe J M (1972) British Journal of Dermatology 87, 460
`MarlaJ R & Harcourt· WebsterN
`(1969) Archives of Dermatology 100, 683
`Marks R & Wilson Jones E
`(1969) Brltish Journal of Dermatology 81, 16
`Monis B, WeinbergT & Spector G J
`(1968) Brltish Journal of Experimental Pathology 49, 302
`Pearse AG E (1960) Histochcmistry: Thcorctical and
`Applied. Churchill, London
`SpectorWG
`(1971) Proceedings ofthe Royal Society of Medicine 64,941
`Spector W G & Lykke A W J
`(1966) Journal o/Pathology and Bacterlology 92, 163
`Wachstein M & Meisel E
`(1960) Journal of Hlstochemistry and Cytochemistry 8, 387
`
`Chronic Fungal Infection
`(E. jloccosum), Erythroderma,
`Immune Deficiency and Lymphoma
`by GM Levene MB MRCP (St John's Hospitalfor
`Diseases ofthe Skin, London WC2H 7BJ)
`
`This report concerns a man with multiple patho-
`logy. An attempt will be made to link bis dis·
`orders together, whicb seem unlikely to have
`arisen solely by unhappy coincidence.
`He is a civil engineer aged 36. He had a healtby
`childhood and the only early comment of note is
`tbat be had some scaling between his toes whilst
`at school. His main trouble started in 1957 whilst
`be was serving in the army in Cyprus at tbe age of
`20. He developed a boil ori his shin, followed by
`pustules on tbe feet and then a generalized weep-
`ing dermatitis. He was treated first in Nicosia and
`tben in military hospitals in England until be was
`discbarged from the army witb a disability pension
`and a diagnosis of 'exfoliative dermatitis'.
`In 195R, about a year after onset of tbe eruption,
`he was admitted to Guy's Hospital under Dr L
`Fdrman witb a persisting generalized exudative
`eruption. He had an episode of septicremia and·
`pleurisy at this time whicb responded weil to
`treatment. At tbis time also scrapings from tbe
`skin sbowed fungus which proved on culture to
`be Epidermophyton floccosum. He was given a
`course oforal griseofulvin whicb bad a dramatic
`effect, clearing bis skin in three weeks. He
`remained completely clear for three months after
`whicb tbere was a slight requrrence. From then on
`fungus has always~been·present in tbe finger-nails
`
`Section of Dermatology
`
`745
`
`and toe-nails and occasionally in the groins
`despite repeated courses of griseofulvin.
`There was no further change in bis skin until
`the summer of 1970 wben he developed a
`generalized pruritic eruption. He was admitted to
`St John's Hospital in October 1970, at which time
`he was found to have a low-grade erythroderma
`involving particularly the tnfuk, groins and thighs.
`Several fi.nger- and toe-miils showed minimal
`dystrophy. There were no otbet abnormal physical
`signs. He had furtherbrief admissions in 1971 and
`1972 for investigation. His erythroderma persisted
`more or less unchanged. Treatment with a mixture
`of equal parts ofbenzoic acid compound ointment
`and Propaderm ointment reduced pruritus and
`scaling.
`In June of 1972, during bis last admission, he
`gave a two-month bistory of indigestion, flatu-
`lence and tbe sensation of food sticking in bis
`ehest. A barium meal performed at his local
`hospital in Aberystwyth indicated an ulcer and
`tumour in tbe cardia of the stomach and he was
`referred to the Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit of
`Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool. <Esopbagoscopy
`was performed and two biopsies taken which
`showed tumour. In September his left ehest and
`abdomen were surgically explored (Mr H R
`Matthews). A tumour of the cardia was found, ·
`partly in the stomach and partly in the cesophagus,
`which was bulky but witb no evidence of spread
`to tbe mediastinal or abdominallymph nodes or .
`liver. <Esophago-gastrectomy Was performed witb
`anastomosis of tbe cesophagus to a gastric tube
`just below the aortic arch. Some local lymph-
`nodes were excised and, in view of the proximity
`of the tumour to the spieen, splenectomy was
`performed as weil. He made a Straightforward
`recovery and has apparently remained weil since.
`The tumour was found on histology to be a
`reticulum cell sarcoma.
`
`lnvestz'gations
`Mycology: E. flo.ccosum bad been found on
`numerous occasions over the years . and,. wa8
`isolated again in toe-nail~, finger-nails and right
`palm in 1970. No f~gus was seen in the scaly red
`lesions on the trunk and shins. The strain of
`E. floccosum isolated from the patient wa:s found
`to be griseofulvin-resistant (minimum inhibitory
`concentration: patient strain >50.00, control
`strain 1.5 p.g/ml; Dr Yvonn~ Clayton). In July
`1972 fungus was found in palins, toes, toe-clefts,
`soles, ballux nails and left finger-nails, but not in
`wrists, trunk, groins, scalp, neck or legs.
`Clinical immunology: Low IgG and IgA Ievels
`were found on tbe four occasions on which
`differential serum immunoglobulins · were esti-
`mated. An average blood IY'mphocytopenia of
`800/mm8 was found with counts below 1000/mma
`on 5 of 7 occa8ions (nornial adult range lOO()J.
`
`Exh. 1035

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket