throbber
EDITOR
`
`ELEFTHERIOS T. PAPOUTSAKIS
`
`A WILEVJNTERSCIENCE PUBLICATION
`
`qv WILEY
`
`I'll!’/l\hL'I\ mm 1' IHH7
`NEW VORK / CHICHESTEH / BRISBANE / TORONTO ./ SINGAPORE
`
`BIBIAU 39 (4) (1992)
`
`ISSN ooos-3592
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 1/5
`
`

`
`&BI()TECHNOLOGY
`BIOENGINEERING
`
`Eleftherios T. Papoutsakis
`Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
`Associate Editors
`
`Douglas S. Clark, University of California
`Berkeley, California
`C. P. Leslie Grady, Jr., Clemson University
`Clemson, South Carolina
`Maria-Regina Kula, Heinrich-Heine Universitat Diisseldort
`in der KFA Julich, Germany
`Daniel l.C. Wang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
`Cambridge, Massachusetts
`
`Founding Editor
`
`Elmer L. Gaden, Jr., University of Virginia,
`Charlottesville, Virginia
`Editorial Board
`
`James E. Bailey
`Harvey W. Blanch
`Arnold L. Demain
`lsao Karube
`
`Malcolm D. Lilly
`Michael L. Shuler
`Daniel Thomas
`
`Scope: The Editors of B&B will consider for publi-
`cation original articles and mini reviews that deal
`with all aspects of applied biotechnology. These
`
`- applied aspects of cellular physiology, metabo-
`lism, and energetics of bacteria, fungi, animal,
`and plant cells;
`- enzyme systems and their applications, including
`enzyme reactors, purification, and applied as-
`pects of protein engineering;
`- animal—cell biotechnology,
`including media de-
`velopment, modeling,
`tissue engineering, and
`applied aspects of cell interactions with their en-
`vironment and other cells;
`- bioseparations and other downstream processes
`including cell disruption, chromatography, of-
`finity purifications, extractions, and membrane
`
`including aerobic
`- environmental biotechnology,
`and anaerobic processes, systems involving bio-
`films, algal systems, detoxification and bioreme-
`diation, and genetic aspects;
`in-
`- applied genetics and metabolic engineering,
`cluding modeling molecular processes of applied
`interest;
`The editors will consider papers for publications
`0 plant-cell biotechnology;
`based on novelty, their immediate or future impact
`transport
`including
`° biochemical
`engineering,
`on biotechnological processes, and their contri-
`phenomena in bioreactors, bioreactor design,
`bution to the advancement of biochemical engi-
`kinetics and modeling of biological systems,
`in-
`neering science. Submission of papers dealing with
`strumentation and control, biological contain-
`routine aspects of bioprocessing, description of
`ment, and bioprocess design;
`established equipment, and routine applications of
`- biosensors;
`established methodologies (e.g., control strategies,
`- spectroscopic and other instrumental techniques
`modeling, experimental methods) are discouraged.
`for biotechnological applications, including NMR
`Theoretical papers will be judged based on the
`and flow cytometry;
`novelty of the approach and their potential impact,
`- thermodynamic aspects of cellular systems and
`or on their novel capability to predict and eluci-
`their applications;
`date experimental observations.
`
`
`including coal biotech-
`
`0 mineral biotechnology,
`nology;
`- biological aspects of biomass and renewable re-
`sources engineering; and
`- fundamental aspects of food biotechnology.
`
`Biotechnology and Bioengineering (ISSN:0006-
`is published 22 times per year,
`semi-
`except May,
`July, September,
`and
`November, when it
`is published monthly, and in
`March and April when it is published 3 times, on
`the 5th, 15th, and 25th, by John Wiley & Sons,
`lnc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158.
`Copyright © 1992 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All
`rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of any
`part of this work beyond that permitted by Sec-
`tions 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law
`without the permission of the copyright owner is
`unlawful. Second-class postage at New York, NY,
`and additional mailing offices.
`The code and copyright notice appearing at the
`bottom of the first page of an item in the journal
`indicates the copyright holder's consent that copies
`may be made for personal or internal use, or for
`the personal or internal use of specific clients, on
`the condition that the copier pay for copying be-
`yond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the
`United States Copyright Law. The percopy fee for
`each item is $4.00 and is to be paid through the
`Copyright Clearance Center,
`lnc., 21 Congress
`
`or for resale. Such permission requests and other
`permission inquiries should be addressed to the
`Permissions Dept.
`
`Subscription price (1992): Volumes 39 8. 40,
`22 issues: $950.00. Outside U.S.A.: $1225.00
`(includes air service and handling). Back volumes,
`microfilm, and microfiche are available for previ-
`ous years; request price list from the publisher.
`Please allow 4 weeks for processing a change of
`address. For subscription inquiries, call customer
`service at (212) 850-6645 or write to the above
`address.
`
`Claims for undelivered copies will be accepted
`only after the following issue has been received.
`Please enclose a copy of the mailing label or cite
`your subscriber reference number in order to expe-
`dite handling. Missing copies will be supplied when
`losses have been sustained in transit and where
`reserve stock permits.
`
`Postmaster: Send address changes to Biotech-
`nology ancl Bioengineering, Susan Malawski, Full-
`fillment Manager, Subscription Department, John
`Wiley & Sons, lnc., 605 Third Avenue, New York,
`
`Advertising Sales, John Wiley 8. Sons, 605 Third
`Ave., New York, NY 10158; (212) 850-8832.
`Advertising Sales, European Contact: Michael
`Levermore, Advertising Manager, John Wiley 8:
`Sons, Ltd., Baffins Lane, Chichester, Sussex PO19
`1UD, England.
`Manuscripts should be submitted to the 8&8
`Editor, Professor Eleftherios T. Papoutsakis, Dept.
`of Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Univer-
`sity, 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston,
`IL 60208-
`3120, USA.
`
`All Other Correspondence: Address to Bia-
`technology & Bioengineering,
`Publisher,
`inter-
`science Division, Professional Reference, and Trade
`Group, John Wiley & Sons, lnc., 605 Third Ave.,
`New York, NY 10158.
`information for contributors appears in the first
`and last issue of each volume. The contents of this
`journal are indexed or abstracted in the following:
`BiologicalAbstracts; ChemicalAbstracts; Chemical
`Titles; Current Awareness in Biological Sciences;
`Current Contents/Life Sciences; Current Contents/
`Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences; Ex-
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 2/5
`
`

`
`Kuo-Ying Amanda Wu and Keith D. Wisecarver*
`Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Tulsa,
`Tulsa, Oklahoma 74704
`
`Received July 78, 7997/Accepted July 26, 79.97
`
`A new cell immobilization technique is described in which
`polyvinyl alcohol
`is crosslinked with boric acid, with the
`addition of a small amount of calcium alginate. The pres- V
`ence of the calcium alginate improves the surface proper-
`ties of the beads, preventing agglomeration. A pure culture
`of phenol-degrading Pseudomonas was immobilized in the
`PVA-alginate beads. Phenol was successfully degraded in a
`fluidized bed of the beads, indicating that cell viability was
`maintained following the immobilization procedure. The
`PVA-alginate beads proved to be very strong and durable,
`with no noticeable degradation of the beads after 2 weeks
`of continuous operation of the fluidized bed.
`Key words: immobilized cell - PVA - polyvinyl alcohol - flu-
`idized bed
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Immobilization of living cells has become an established
`technique for increasing the productivity of biochemi-
`cal engineering processes. One of the most \videly used
`techniques for cell immobilization is cell entrapment, in
`which the living cells are enclosed in a polymeric matrix
`which is porous enough to allow the diffusion of sub-
`strates to the cells and of products away from the cells.
`Materials which have been successfully used for cell
`entrapment include agar, agarose, kappa—carragennan,
`collagen, alginates, chitosan, polyacrylamide, polyure-
`thane, and cellulose.°’I-Iowever, each of these polymers
`has drawbacks, such as poor mechanical strength and
`durability (agar, agarose, kappa—carragennan, collagen,
`alginates, chitosan),
`toxicity to microorganisms (poly-
`acrylamide, polyurethane), or high cost.”
`Recently, the use of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) for cell
`immobilization has been investigated. Ariga et al.’ used
`the technique of iterative freezing and thawing of PVA
`to form a gel suitable for cell immobilization. They found
`that this technique produced a low—Cost material with
`a rubber—like elasticity and high strength. Hashimoto
`and Furukawa3 used a simpler and less energy—intensive
`method for PVA immobilization. The crosslinked the
`PVA using a boric acid solution, producing a monodiol—
`type PVA-boric acid gel lattice.“ Activated sludge was
`successfully immobilized using this technique, with no
`apparent loss of biological activity. The beads thus pro-
`duced proved to be very durable, outlasting beads pro-
`
`* To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
`
`duced by other cell immobilization techniques such as
`polyacrylamide and calcium alginate.‘
`The PVA-boric acid technique provides an easy and
`low—cost method of cell immobilization, producing elas-
`tic beads of high strength and durability} There are two
`potential problems with this technique, however. The
`saturated boric acid solution used to crosslink the PVA
`
`is highly acidic (pH of approximately 4) and thus could
`cause difficulty in maintaining cell viability. Hashimoto
`and Furukawal hypothesized that activated sludge could
`be successfully immobilized without loss of biological
`activity due to the presence of extracellular polymer in
`the sludge, which enables the microorganisms to endure
`changes in cultivation conditions, and cast doubt on
`whether the technique could be applicable for other
`types of cells. To date, the use of the PVA-boric acid im-
`mobilization technique for other types of microorgan-
`isms has not been demonstrated. In addition, PVA is an
`extremely sticky material; PVA beads, therefore, have a
`tendency to agglomerate. This is particularly a problem
`in applying PVA-immobilized cells to fluidized bed
`reactors. The elasticity and high strength of the PVA
`beads are ideally suited to the high shear stresses en-
`countered in fluidized beds,’ but the tendency of PVA
`beads to agglomerate can make fluidization difficult or
`impossible.
`In this article, a new cell immobilization technique is
`described which eliminates the agglomeration problem
`of the PVA-boric acid method by the addition of a small
`amount of calcium alginate. The technique was demon-
`strated for a pure culture ofPseudom0nas. The resulting
`beads were utilized in a three—phase fluidized bed biore-
`actor to demonstrate viability of the immobilized cells.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`The microorganisms used in this work was a pure strain
`of phenol-degrading Pseudomomzs isolate (strain #1101)
`obtained from Microbe Masters Inc., Baton Rouge, LA.
`The organisms had been acclimated to 500 ppm phenol
`as a sole source of carbon before shipment. The me-
`dium used for growth of the culture is given in Table I;
`phenol was the sole carbon source in all experiments.
`Cultures were grown at a temperature of 30°C to an
`
`Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 39, Pp. 447-449 (1992)
`© ‘I992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`CCC 0006-3592/92/O40447—O3$04.00
`
`
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 3/5
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 3/5
`
`

`
`Table 1. Composition of stock nutrient medium.
`
`Component
`
`Concentration
`
`CaClg - 2HgO
`wgso,-7H3o
`MHSO4 ‘ H30
`FCSO4 ’
`Trace elements“
`
`K;HPO4/KH3PO4 buffer, pH 7.6 to 9.0
`
`Variable
`
`2.13 g/L
`1.00 g/L
`0.6 g/L
`0.02 g/L
`0.02 g/L
`
`i5muL
`
`“ Trace elements include (mg/L): zinc, 0.01; copper, 0.001; sele-
`nium, 0.001.
`
`OD (460 nm) of approximately 1.1, a period of approxi-
`mately 24—30 h, at which time they were centrifuged at
`1000 rpm for 10 min.
`The cell immobilization process is illustrated in Fig-
`ure 1. Water was added to 43.7 g of polyvinyl alcohol
`(100% hydrolyzed, average MW 77,000 to 79,000) to ob-
`tain 330 mL of solution. The solution was then carefully
`heated to a temperature of 60°C to completely dissolve
`the PVA. A solution of 3.5 mL of 2% sodium alginate
`(low viscosity, approximately 250 cps) in water was pre-
`pared by gently stirring for 30 min and added to the PVA
`solution. The PVA-alginate solution was then cooled to
`a temperature of 35°C.
`The centrifuged cells (45.6 g wet weight) and 35 mL
`of distilled water were mixed with 6.3 mL of the growth
`medium (Table I) to supply nutrients for the microbial
`
`Concentrated suspension
`of bacteria
`
`Aqueous solution
`-13% PVA at 60 "C
`
`~0.02% sodium alginate
`1
`Cool to 35 °C
`/
`mix and drop into solution of saturated
`boric acid with 2% calcium chloride
`
`1
`
`allow to harden in
`solution for 24 hours
`
`1
`rinse with distilled water
`
`1
`3 mm diameter PVA-immobilized beads
`~10% PVA
`
`cells during the solidification process. This mixture
`was then added to the PVA solution and mixed thor.
`oughly. The final suspension of cells contained 10.8%
`(w/v) wet cells (total cell density of 6.4 X 10” cells/cm3),
`10.4% (w/v) PVA, 0.02% (w/v) sodium alginate, and
`growth medium diluted to 1.5 parts per 100.
`Beads were formed by crosslinking the PVA with boric
`acid: the PVA-alginate cell suspension was extruded via
`a peristaltic pump through a thin needle into 10 L of so-
`lution consisting of saturated boric acid and 2% CaCl2 -
`2H 3O at room temperature. The beads were kept gently
`stirred in this solution for 24 h to complete the solidi-
`fication, and then rinsed with distilled water to remove
`any excess boric acid. Approximately 420 cm} of beads
`containing the immobilized cells were thus formed. The
`diameter of the beads was approximately 3 mm.
`Cell viability and bead integrity were tested in an 8-L
`fluidized bed column. The 10.16 cm ID column was
`
`sparged with air at a rate of 1.4 L/min. Growth medium
`(Table I), containing varying concentrations of phenol,
`was fed continuously from the top of the column, and
`effluent withdrawn at the column bottom, at a rate of
`2.5 L/h. The fluidized bed experiments were conducted
`at room temperature.
`the samples in this
`Phenol concentrations of all
`work were analyzed by gas chromatography" (Hewlett-
`Packard model 5890A with flame ionization detector).
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Initial attempts at cell immobilization were made using
`only PVA crosslinked with boric acid. However,
`the
`beads thus formed had a strong tendency to agglomerate
`into a mass of polymer which was very difficult to break
`up. The beads could, therefore, not be utilized in a flu-
`idized bed. This agglomeration problem appears to be
`due to the relatively slow crosslinking of the PVA by
`boric acid. Droplets of PVA, which have not been suffi-
`ciently crosslinked, tended to agglomerate into a mass.
`This problem persisted even with vigorous stirring of
`the boric acid solution to keep the beads suspended.
`Attempts were then made to use a combination of
`PVA—boric acid and calcium alginate, by hardening a
`mixture of PVA and sodium alginate with a mixed solu-
`tion of boric acid and calcium chloride. In this way, it
`was thought that the PVA might contribute durability
`and strength to the beads, while calcium alginate might
`improve the surface properties of the beads, reducing
`the tendency to agglomerate. The percentage of PVA ill
`the beads was kept in the range of 10% to 12.5%, 35
`recommended by Hashimoto and Furukawaf to main‘
`tain maximum bead strength. Varying ratios of dfl’
`PVA to 2% sodium alginate solution were attempted fOf
`the immobilization procedure. It was found that ag-
`glomeration of the beads was entirely prevented f0T
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 4/5
`
`

`
`taneously when the sodium alginate solution contacts
`the calcium chloride solution, and that the resulting
`polymeric structure is sufficient to keep the beads from
`agglomerating during the PVA crosslinking process. The
`resulting beads were strong and highly elastic, and of
`nearly spherical shape.
`Fluidized bed experiments were conducted continu-
`ously over a period of 2 weeks. Inlet phenol concentra-
`tion was increased in steps from 250 to 1300 mg/L (inlet
`phenol concentrations of 250, 350, 450, 550, 650, 750,
`850, 950, 1000, 1100, 1200, and 1300 mg/L were used),
`with the bioreactor allowed to achieve steady state be-
`tween each step increase. This range was chosen to be
`close to the range of phenol concentrations to which the
`microorganisms had been acclimated. The steady-state
`outlet phenol concentration, measured by gas chro-
`matography, was found to be zero for each of these inlet
`phenol concentrations.
`Phenol removal due to stripping was measured by di-
`verting the off-gas from the column through a NaOH
`solution (pH 10) and measuring the absorbed phenol.
`The phenol removed by stripping was found to be less
`than 0.1% of the total phenol degradation. Bioadsorp—
`tion has been found by a number of investigators to be
`small in comparison with biodegradation.”'7 Therefore,
`it can be concluded that phenol removal in the fluidized
`bed was due almost entirely to biodegradation, indicat-
`ing that cell viability was maintained through the im-
`mobilization procedure.
`The bioparticles made from the PVA—alginate immo-
`bilization technique proved to be very durable, show-
`ing no sign of breakage or disintegration after 2 weeks
`of continuous operatioii of the fluidized bed. The PVA-
`alginate beads showed no tendency to agglomerate at
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Immobilization of living cells of a phenol—degrading
`Pseudomonas isolate in a PVA-boric acid gel was dem-
`onstrated. Cell viability was indicated by degradation of
`phenol in a fluidized bed reactor of the beads. The pres-
`ence of a small amount of calcium alginate in the beads,
`as small as 0.02%, was shown to prevent agglomeration
`of the PVA beads. The resulting beads were highly elas-
`tic and durable; they were able to withstand high shears
`in a three—phase fluidized bed for 2 weeks of continu-
`ous operation with no noticeable breakage or shrinkage
`of the beads. The successful immobilization of a Pseu-
`
`domonas isolate by the PVA-boric acid method indi-
`cates that the technique might be applicable to a wide
`variety of microorganisms.
`
`References
`
`l. Ariga, O., Takagi, H., Nishizawa, H., Sano, Y. 1987. J. Ferment.
`Technol. 65: 651.
`
`2. Gaudy, A.F., Kincannon, D.F., Manickam, T.S. June 1982.
`EPA—600/2-82-075.
`
`3. Hashimoto, S., Furukawa, K. 1987. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 15: 52.
`4. Kincannon, D.F., Stover, E.L., Nichols, V., Medley, D. 1983.
`J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55: 157.
`
`5. Kuu, W.Y., Polack, J. A. 1983. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25: 1995.
`6. Ochiai, H., Shimizu, S., Tadokoro, Y., Murakami, I. 1981. Poly-
`mer 22: 1456.
`
`7. Petrasek, A. C., Kugelman, I. J., Austern, B. M., Pressley, T. A.,
`Winslow, L. A., Wise, R. H. 1983.1 Water Pollut. Control Fed.
`55: 1286.
`8. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste-
`water, 16 ed. 1985. American Public Health Association, Wash-
`ington, DC.
`9. Tampion, J., Tampion, M. D. 1987. Immobilized cells: Principles
`and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
`
`
`
`..m_.—_«— — - j‘
`
`
`
`
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20‘l5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 5/5
`
`COMMUNICATIONS TO THE EDITOR
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2155 - 5/5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket