throbber
J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 347-358
`
`347
`
`3-Hydroxy-3-rnethylglutaryl-coenzyme A Reductaae Inhibitors. 1. Structural
`Modification of 5-Substituted 3,5-Dihydroxypentanoic Acids and Their Lactone
`Derivatives
`
`G. E. Stokker,“ W. F. Hoffman," A. W. Alberta,‘ E. J. Cragoe, Jr.,' A. A. Deana,’ J. L. Gilflllan,‘ J. W. Huff,‘
`F. C. Novella,’ J. D. Prugh,' R. L. Smith,‘ and A. K. Willard”
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, and Rahway, New Jersey 07065.
`Received June 21, 1984
`
`A series of 5-substituted 3.5-dihydroxypentanoic acids and their derivatives have been prepared and tested for inhibitirm
`of HMG-CoA reductase in vitro. In general, unless a carboxylate anion can be formed and the hydroxy groups remain
`unsubstituted in an erythro relationship, inhibitory activity is greatly reduced. Furthermore, only one snantiomer
`of the ring-opened form of lactone 8a(-.t) possesses the activity displayed by the racemate. Insertion of a bridging
`unit other than ethyl or (E)-ethenyl between the 5-carbinol moiety and an appropriate lipophilic moiety (e.g.,
`2.4-dichlorophenyl) attenuates activity.
`
`Formation of the atheromatous plaque or atheroma is
`accompanied by the localized deposition of plasma lipids.
`primarily cholesteryl esters, in the intima of the arterial
`wall.“ Growth of the atheroma eventually leads to con-
`striction of the coronary arterial lumen and ultimately
`results in atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease (CH-
`D), the major cause of death and disability in Western
`countries. These observations, coupled with the compelling
`epidemiological evidence implicating hypercholesterolemia
`as a primary risk factor for CHD.3-‘ have stimulated re-
`search on the development of therapeutic agents for pre-
`venting and treating atherosclerosis based on the attenu-
`ation of plasma cholesterol levels.‘ The results of the
`recently completed Lipid Research Clinics Coronary
`Primary Prevention Trial (LRC-CPP'I‘)° provide strong
`support for the basis of this approach. The LRC-CPPT
`clearly demonstrated that reduction of low-density lipo
`protein cholesterol (LDL-C) through dietary modification
`and treatment with the bile acid sequesterant cholestyr-
`amine. either alone or in combination, diminished the
`incidence of CHD morbidity and mortality in hypercho-
`lesterolemic men at high risk for CHD. Nevertheless, the
`reduction of dietary cholesterol and saturated fat intake
`and the use of bile acid sequesterants often fail to lower
`elevated plasma LDL-C levels to the desired extent, par-
`3_'<‘:}\1Il)a§ly in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia
`An attractive and potentially more efficacious way to
`lower plasma cholesterol levels would be to control de novo
`choleaterogenesis by selectively inhibiting an early bio-
`synthetic step. The highly functionalized fungal metab-
`olites compactin (ML-236B, CS-500)’ and mevinolin
`(MK-803)’ are potent inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis
`at the level of the major rate-limiting enzyme 3-hydroxy-
`3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase [HMG-CoA re-
`ductase; mevalonate:NADP* oxidoreductase (CoA acy-
`latins). EC 1.1.l.34],‘° which catalyzes the conversion of
`HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid (eq 1).
`Indeed, mevinolinic
`CH3
`EH3
`HO 5
`=_
`
`H
`
`C02" nus-coa uauclen
`0
`nova
`
`C02“
`OH
`
`U)
`
`Sc“
`NMG-COA
`
`
`mevalonic acid
`
`‘Merck Sharp 8: Dohme, West Point. PA.
`‘Merck Sharp dz Dohme, Rahway. NJ.
`‘Present address: Stuart Pharmaceuticals. Division of 1C!
`Americas, Wilmington, DE 19897.
`
`acid (1), the dihydroxy acid form of mevinolin, is the most
`potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (K. I 0.6 nM) re-
`ported to date.’ Of even greater interest are the findings
`that compsctln“-" and mevino1in°"° are highly etfective
`hypocholeeterolemic agents in several animal species and
`man. Subsequent to the first reports disclosing the
`structure“ and biological activity’ of compactin, a series
`of studies directed toward the development of structurally
`simplified HMG—CoA reductase inhibitors were initiated
`in these Laboratories. Described in this paper are the
`results of our
`study,“ which served to delineate key
`
`
`(6)
`
`(1) Ross, R. Annu. Rev. Med. 1919, 80, 1.
`(2) Fuator, V. Scand. J. Haamatal. 1081, 27 (Suppl. 38), 1.
`(3) US. Department of Health and Human Services, National
`Iratitutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Insti-
`tute, “Arterioscleroeis“, Vol. 1 and 9. NIH Publication No.
`81-2034 and 81-2035, U.S. G.P.O., Washington, DC, 1981.
`(4) Hamburg, D. A.; Elliott, G. R. Arteriosclerolie 1982, 2, 357.
`(5) Prugh, J. D.; Rooney, C. S.; Smith, R. 1.. Annu. Rep. Med.
`Chem. i983, l8, 161.
`(a) LRC-CPPT, J. Am. Med. Assoc. I984, 251. 351. (b) I..RC-
`CPPT, Ibid. I984, 251, 365.
`(7) Havel, R. J.; Kane, J. P. Annu. Rev. Med. 1982, 33, 417.
`(8) Endo, A.; Kurods. M.: Tsuiits, Y.J. Antibiot. 1978 29, 1343.
`(9) Alberta, A. W.; Chen, J.; Kuron, G.; Hunt, V.; Huff, J.; Hoff-
`man. C.; Rothrock. J.; Lopez, M.: Joshua, H.; Harris, 13.;
`Patchett, A.; Monaghan, R.; Currie, S.; Stapley, E.; Alban-
`Schonberg, G.; Hensens, 0.-, Hirshfield, J.; l-loogstsen. K.;
`Liesch, J.; Springer, J. Proc. Natl. Accd. Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77,
`3957.
`(10) Rodwsll. V. W.; Nordstrom, J. L.; Mitschelen, J. J. Adv. Lipid
`Res. 1976, 14, 1.
`(a) Teujita, Y.; Kuroda, M; Tanzawa, K.; Kitano, N.; Bndo. A.
`Atherosclerosis (Shannon,Irel.) 1978, 32, W7. (b) Kuroda, M.:
`Tsujita, Y.; Tanzawa, K.; Endo. A. Lipids 1979, 14, 585.
`(12) (a) Yamarnoto, A.; Sudo, H.; Endo, A. Atherosclerosis (Shan-
`non, Irel.) 1980. 35. 259.
`(b) Mabuchi, H.; Haba. T.; Tstami.
`R.; Miyamoto. S.; Sakai, Y.; Wakasugi, T.; Watanabe. A.;
`Koizumi, J.; Takeda, R. N. Engl. J. Med. 1931, .905, as.
`(a) Tobert. J. A.; Hitzenberger, G.: Kulrovstz, W. R.; Holmes,
`1. B.; Jones, K. H. Atherosclerosis (Shannon. Irel.) 1982, 41.
`61.
`(b) Tobert, J. A.; Bell, G. D.; Birtwoll, J.; James, 1.; Ku-
`kovetz, W. R.; Pryor, J. S.; Buntinx, A.; Holmes. 1. B.; Cbao.
`Y.-S.; Bolognese, J. A. J. Clin. Invest. 1982, 69, 913.
`(14) The X-ray crystal structure of eoumactin was first reported by
`Brown. A. G.; Smale. T. C.; King, '1'. J.; Hansenkamp. R..:
`Thompson, R. H. J. Chem. Sac., Perkin Trans. I 1978, 1165.
`Note that the relative configuration in Figure 1 of the cited
`reference does not agree with the crystal coordinates; we
`present here the correct relative and absolute stereochemical
`configuration of compectin.
`
`(11)
`
`(13)
`
`0022-2623/85/1828-0347301150/0
`
`-D 1985 American Chemical Society
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`

`
`Stoklter ct al.
`
`slightly modified procedure of Noltes et al.” provided
`4-hydroxy ketone ll in high yield. Acylation of 11 with
`2-bromoacetyl bromide in the presence of pyridine fur-
`nished bromo acetate 12 which was ring closed to 4-
`hydroxy-4-methyl lactone 13 via an intramolecular Re-
`formatsky reaction.“ Substitution of triethylamine for
`pyridine in the acylation step resulted in elimination of
`the 2-bromoacetoxy moiety and isolation of the resultant
`dienone.
`An alternate route to lactone 13 starting from 4-hydroxy
`lretone ll was investigated. This route involved sequential
`acylation, intermolecular Reformatsky reaction with ethyl
`2-bromoacetate, basic hydrolysis, acidification, and lac-
`tonization. This route was abandoned in favor of the more
`efficient two-step route (vide supra). Ethylene lactone 13s
`was reduced in the same manner as 6a(i) to provide the
`corresponding ethyl-bridged compound 16. Refluxing a
`solution of 13a and toluene in the presence of PTSA (trace)
`resulted in the smooth conversion of 13a to 17.
`5-Methoxy-3-hydroxyheptsnoic acid 20 was prepared by
`treating the dimethyl acetal of 2 with diketene (1 equiv)
`in the presence of TiCl4 by using the general procedure
`of Izawa and Mukaiyama" followed by borohydride re—
`duction, basic hydrolysis. and acidification of the resultant
`3-keto ester 19 as shown in Scheme III. A similar con-
`densation of aldehyde 2 provided a mixture of 3-kete ester
`3 and dihydro lactone A and, thus, was a less expeditious
`route to target lactone 6 than was the dianion procedure
`(Scheme I).
`The previously undescribed requisite aldehydes were
`prepared as shown in Schemes [V-VIII. The synthesis
`of the oz..8-unsaturated aldehyde 55a needed for elaborating
`lactone 55 is shown in Scheme IV with phenanthrene-4-
`carboxaldehyde as starting material This procedure was
`also used to prepare the lmown a,B-unsaturated aldehyde
`precursors for lactones 56-58.
`The 3-(decahydronaphthyl)propanals 25 and 27 (pre-
`cursors to 51 and 52) were elaborated from 21 as shown
`in Scheme V. After high-pressure hydrogenation of 22, the
`acid 23 was converted to aldehyde 25 by the Burgstahler
`modification of the Rosenmund reduction.” The ethyl
`ester of 23 (24, isolated in about an equal amount during
`the workup of 23) was isomerized with AICI3 (2 equiv) at
`room temperature and subsequently hydrolyzed to acid
`26, which was converted to aldehyde 27 in the same
`manner used for 23 -> 25.
`The Dibal reduction of nitriles 29, 32, and 34 (Scheme
`VI) provided the aldehydes requisite for preparing lactones
`47, 48, and 53, respectively. Aldehyde 37 (precursor to
`44)" was prepared by alkylation of phenol 36 with the
`diethyl acetal of 2-brornoacetaldehyde followed by hy-
`drolysis (Scheme VII).
`Finally, conversion of cinnamaldehyde 2 to propargyl-
`aldehyde 41 (precursor to 42) was effected via the four step
`sequence 2 -v 38 - 39 - 40 —~ 41 by using the general
`method of Allen and Edens” as shown in Scheme VIII.
`
`
`(17) Noltes.J. G.; Verbeelr, F.; Creemers, H. M. J. C. Organometal.
`Chem. Synlh. 1970-1971. I, 57.
`In the present case, (ti-i»
`butylstannyl)acetone was prepared in situ.
`(18) For a general method, see: Maruoka, K.; Hashimoto. S.; Kl-
`tagawa, Y.: Yamsrnoto. l-1.: Nozalri. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. l977.
`99, 7705.
`(19) Iuwa, T.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. I975, 161.
`(20) Burgstahler. A. W.; WeigeL L. 0.; Shaefer, C. G. Synthesis
`1976, 767.
`(21) During the course of this investigation. the 4R.6R dechloro
`analogue was prepared from tri-0-acetyl-D-glucal as a possible
`HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor by Yang et al.: Yang. Y. L;
`Falclr, J. R. Tetrahedron belt. 1982, 23, 4305.
`
`348 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 28, No. 3
`
`SAR,s for oompactin-like mimics and afforded a series of
`moderately effective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors typ-
`ified by the ring-opened form of lactone 8a(+).
`
`
`
`compncjin R- H
`movmolm. 5- CH3
`
`I
`
`011(9)
`
`Chemistry. The compounds prepared for this study
`are listed in Tables I—III.
`Their syntheses from the
`corresponding aldehydes, exemplified by 2, are shown in
`Schemes I-II]. Condensation of aldehyde 2 with the
`dianion of ethyl acetoacetate" followed by borohydride
`reduction, basic hydrolysis, acidification, and azeotropic
`removal of water provided a mixture of the trans (6a(:h))
`and cis (6b(:h)) lactones which subsequently was separated
`by chromatography (Scheme 1). The use of MeOH in the
`borohydride reduction step was found to be advantageous;
`replacement of MeOH by Et0l-I produced some of the
`corresponding ethyl ester which was more resistant to
`hydrolysis. The resolution of 6a(:£) was accomplished via
`formation and chromatographic separation of the diaste-
`reomeric (R)-oz-methylbenzylamines followed by basic
`hydrolysis and relactonization to yield 6a(+) and 6a(—).
`Hydrolysis and acidification of 5-hydroxy-3-keto ester
`3 without prior reduction resulted in spontaneous lacton-
`ization to enol lactone 4. Numerous attempts to reduce
`4 to hydrory lactone 6, either catslytically or via metal
`hydrides, were unsuccessful. Treatment of lactone 6a(:i:)
`with NH3 provided the erythro amide 10. Catalytic re-
`duction of lactone 6a(¢) provided compound 7 containing
`a saturated bridging unit. The lactol others 8 and 9 were
`prepared by diisobutylaluminum hydride (Dibal) reduction
`of 6a(:l:) followed by treatment with Me0H in the pres-
`ence of pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (PPTS).
`The syntheses of methyl lactones l3, l6, and 17 are
`illustrated in Scheme II. A tin-mediated aldol condensa-
`tion of aldehyde 2 with 2-acetoxypropene following a
`
`(15) During the course of this study, a series of rnevalonolactone
`derivatives of the general structure were reported to inhibit
`on
`
`cu.‘-We
`
`icn,;
`
`X
`
`I
`
`/\
`
`I-IMG-CoA reductase by Sato er. al; Sato, A.; Ogiso, A.; No-
`guchi, l-l.: Mitsui, 5.; Kaneko, L, Shimada, Y. Chem. Pharm.
`Bull. 1980, 28, 1509.
`(16) Huclrin. S. N.; Weiler, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 4835.
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`
`I-lMG~CoA Reductase Inhibitors
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3 349
`
`Table I. Effects of Lactone Modification and Stereochemistry
`
`\ R
`
`
`
`yield.
`70
`52
`
`ml). °C
`168-169
`
`f°1’m“13°
`C,,H,,c1,o,
`
`°°n°“v
`I-‘F/mll
`2
`X0
`50
`
`i"h‘b°
`0
`12
`15
`
`no.
`4:1
`
`og(§)v
`
`cut)
`
`R
`
`Cl
`
`recryst
`solvent
`
`°"
`\
`o
`
`0
`
`vs‘
`
`0
`
`on
`d
`g”
`(1
`o
`““
`o
`
`Eton
`
`acetone/hexane
`
`acetone/hexane
`
`6g(+)
`
`"
`
`n-BuCl
`
`“
`
`0
`
`q
`
`8g(-)
`
`3‘
`
`9‘
`
`n-BuCl
`
`"
`
`g
`
`chronmt. acetone/CH;Cl;
`
`chromat. acetone]Cl-MCI;
`
`°"‘
`El
`o
`0"
`“K0 »,,,°c
`n
`(ll
`0
`cm
`10' wk acetone/hexane
`
`33
`
`17
`
`25
`
`M
`
`33
`
`64
`
`63
`
`148-150
`
`C,,H,,Cl,0,
`
`115-117
`
`C1aHuC120s
`
`114-116
`
`C,3HuCl,03
`
`11¢-116
`
`C;3C1gClg0;
`
`wax
`
`C,4H,.Cl,0,-i/.H,0
`
`88-93
`
`C..H,.Cl,O3
`
`117-118
`
`C,,H,,Cl,N05
`
`1o
`10
`2
`1o
`20
`50
`
`;
`5
`10
`20
`
`;
`4
`3
`3
`5
`2
`8
`10
`1
`3
`8
`
`Q
`4
`10
`4
`2
`1o
`25
`
`84
`
`64
`g
`27
`17
`18
`
`2g
`66
`72
`86
`
`3
`o
`0
`2
`4
`3
`6
`o
`0
`3
`0
`
`2?
`
`3
`5
`15
`
`13a
`
`lab
`
`’'° 35“:
`=
`‘‘"‘°
`0
`
`C“
`\_
`‘
`
`__~°"
`o
`
`n-BuCl
`
`35’
`
`136-138
`
`C,.H,.Cl,O,
`
`n-BuCl/hexane
`
`5.4
`
`185-137
`
`C,.H,.Cl,0,
`
`o
`
`I7
`
`chromat. CHCI,/Me0H
`
`90
`
`108-110
`
`C..HnCl,0,
`
`4
`3
`2
`‘"3
`3
`10
`A
`5
`25
`o
`0
`2
`0
`1
`Cul-l1,Cl,0.‘
`gum
`42"
`chromat. Cl-l,C1,/HOAc
`/{*5/°{/fl\
`20'
`°"
`o
`5
`
`10 0
`‘Analytical results are within $0.49!: of the theoretical values unless otherwise noted. °See Experimental Section for protocol.
`‘ Tested
`in the form indicated since csrboxylate anion could not be formed under this testing protocol. ‘pK, - 5.22 (30% Etol-I). ‘When tested in
`the lactone form only 25% inhibition was observed at 50 pg/mL. ’ Yield from 12 ‘About a 4:3 ratio of erythro and threo.
`‘Overall yield
`from 18. ‘Anal. Calcd: C, 62.68. Found: C, 52.02.
`
`The synthesis of 43 (the Z isomer of 6a(-.t)) was accom-
`plished by the catalytic hydrogenation (Lindlar) of 42.
`Biological Results and Discussion
`The compounds listed in Tables I-IV were evaluated for
`their ability to inhibit solubilized, partially purified rat
`liver HMG-CoA reductase. During the initial phase of this
`study, both the lactone and the ring-opened sodium di-
`
`
`(22) Allen, C. F. !-1.: Edens, C. 0., Jr. ‘Organic Syntheses”; Wiley,
`New York, 1955; Collect. Vol. III.
`
`hydroxycarboxylate forms of each compound were tested
`for intrinsic inhibitory activity. In each instance, the so-
`dium dihydroxycarboxylate form proved more active than
`the lactone form (see Table I, footnote e). Accordingly,
`subsequent tests were done exclusively on the sodium
`dihydroxycarboxylate forms unless noted otherwise.
`The contributions of lactone moiety stereochemistry and
`functionality to intrinsic inhibitory activity in compound
`6 are illustrated in Table I. Separation of the lac1one
`mixture 6 into the racemic cis (6b(é)) and trans (6a(*))
`isomers showed that activity resided principally in the
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`
`350 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3
`
`Stem," at “L
`
`Table 11. Effects of Bridge Modification
`
`
`
`"°~
`
`A
`
`recrynt
`-olvm
`
`yield,
`%
`
`mp. °C
`
`formula‘
`
`concm
`pg/ml.
`
`«jg,
`inhib‘
`
`1
`2
`5
`10
`
`1
`2
`4
`
`8
`0.625
`3.125
`
`0.625
`3.125
`
`1
`2
`4
`10
`5
`10
`20
`50
`
`5
`10
`20
`50
`5
`10
`20
`50
`
`25
`10
`25
`
`29
`38
`57
`H)
`
`14
`26
`37
`
`88
`0
`8
`
`0
`0
`
`21
`24
`18
`21
`4
`26
`27
`23
`
`16
`9
`7
`18
`19
`29
`45
`61
`
`7
`25
`35
`
`.. 5A\\“ A0
`
`cu
`
`7
`
`/C"zC"z/
`
`"'B“Cl
`
`60
`
`93'”
`
`Cl8Hl4Cl2o3
`
`18‘
`
`,cu,cu,/
`
`chromat. CH,Cl,/acetone
`
`50
`
`87-88
`
`CuH,,Cl,O,
`
`—C=C—
`
`chromat. Cflgclg/BCGIODG
`
`_
`viscous oil
`
`C13}-l,oCl,O3
`
`"\c=c/it
`/
`\
`
`,ocu,/
`
`chrornat.‘ IPA/hexane
`
`96-98
`
`chromat. CH,Cl,/acetone
`
`4.2‘
`
`oil
`
`C1,H,,Cl,O3
`
`C,,H,,C|,0.
`
`J
`
`ll
`
`50
`
`rt-BuCl
`
`13‘
`
`133-135
`
`CuHmClg03
`
`\/
`
`CH,Cl,/n-Cgl-l,Cl
`
`24‘
`
`104-107
`
`C151-["03
`
`42
`
`43
`
`44
`
`45
`
`46
`
`47
`
`/¢;..,c...:/
`
`chromat. CH,Clg/acetone
`
`9.5‘
`
`gum
`
`C,-,1-1,30,-'/,1-1,0
`
`‘B
`
`/C" ,5“, c”,/
`
`CIIIOIIIII. Cflgclg/30e$0n3
`
`I6‘
`
`Oll
`
`Clgiiwoyl/mC3l"lgo
`
`‘See Experimental Section for protocol.
`‘Analytical results are within £0.47. of the theoretical values unless otherwise noted.
`‘Equatorial 4-Me in lactone by reduction of 131.
`‘Overall yield from aldehyde.
`'HPLC purification on Dupont silica 10/30 with i-
`Pr0H—hexsne (1:19, v/v) at 2 mL/min. Times of elution are 13.2 min for 42 and 21.8 min for 43.
`
`racernic trans lactone (6a(:h)). Resolution of 6a(:t) af-
`forded enantiomers 6a(+) and 6a(—); their evaluation
`showed that the activity displayed by the racemate re-
`sulted solely from the dextrorotatory isomer. The addition
`of a methyl group to the 4-position of 6a(:i:) to give trans
`lactone 13a, a compound which more closely resembles the
`I-IMG moiety of the substrate HMG-CoA, did not alter
`activity appreciably. However, cis lactone 13b, which
`possesses the opposite relative stereocbemistry at C-4, was
`much less active as anticipated from the results obtained
`for 6a,(i) and 6b(i).
`Interestingly, oxidation of the 4-
`hydroxyl group of 6a(:t) to provide enol 4 greatly reduced
`activity. This result is a likely consequence of the fact that
`4 readily forms the sodium salt of the enolate and,
`therefore, fails to undergo ring opening to afford the re-
`quired carboxylate anion under alkaline conditions. Re-
`placement of the enolic hydroxyl group in 4 with a methyl
`group to provide 17 further reduced activity. Replacement
`of the carboxyl group in the ring-opened form of 6a(:k)
`with a carboxamido group ([0) ablated activity as did
`conversion of the 5-hydroxl group to the corresponding
`
`methyl ether (20). These results demonstrate the im-
`portant contributions of the carboxylate and 5-hydroxyl
`groups to activity. Finally, it should be noted that lactol
`ethers 8 and 9 displayed greatly diminished activities.
`The effects of altering the moiety bridging the aromatic
`and the lactone fragments in 6a(t) on intrinsic inhibitory
`activity are shown in Table II. Saturation of the ethenyl
`bridge in 6a(£) and its 4-methyl derivative 13a(i) gave
`ethyl-bridged compounds 7 and 16. respectively, with little
`change in activity. However, other modifications of the
`bridge such as replacement with the ethynyl (42), cis-
`ethenyl (43), and oxymethylene (44) groups resulted in loss
`of activity as did complete removal (45) of the bridging
`moiety. In a companion series of naphthalene analogues
`(Table II), compound 47 containing the saturated two-
`carbon bridge proved superior. Increasing the length of
`the bridge to three carbons (48) reduced activity and
`elimination of the bridge to provide 46 further reduced
`activity.
`The results of various carbocyclic moieties substituted
`at the 6-position of the lactone ring are shown in Table
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`
`HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
`
`Table III. Effects of 6-Substitution
`
`01-1
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3 351
`
`x\“‘
`0
`
`t
`I Id.‘
`concn.
`%
`:(e)l:\xI:’!'ll.
`y git
`ug/mL
`inhib‘
`Et,O/pet. other
`~8-l0
`13
`(1)
`20
`0
`50
`36
`
`X
`
`0/
`
`mp. ‘C
`56-58
`
`formula“
`Cul-{"03
`
`no.
`49
`
`max
`
`51-:
`
`52-4'
`
`saw‘
`
`54
`
`55
`
`k
`
`56
`
`©/can
`© C“=c“/
`O O
`/'
`@‘
`@
`
`I
`57 @
`O
`
`58"
`

`'_
`
`.0
`
`n
`
`n-BuCl
`
`.
`IIBUCI
`
`.3 c1
`11
`
`n
`
`n-BuCl
`
`,.,c,,‘/
`
`UC
`
`H gu,c»./
`CD
`‘.1
`G3
`74
`
`v~‘°"‘°“'
`
`Et,0/hexane
`
`~3-10
`
`69-70.5
`
`c.,H,,o,I
`
`121,0/hexane
`
`~3-10
`
`as-71
`
`c,,H,0,0.1H,0“
`
`,
`
`Et,0/hexane
`
`~23-10
`
`102-110
`
`c.,1-1,03
`
`Et,0/hexane
`
`~s-1o
`
`122-129
`
`c,,1-1.0,
`
`/
`
`Et,O
`
`23
`
`25
`
`3
`
`12
`
`10
`
`96-98
`
`C,,..H..0,
`
`140-142
`
`151-152
`
`gum
`
`C,,l-L503
`
`C H 0
`10
`1s
`
`3
`
`c 1-1 0
`2,
`,3
`
`3
`
`143-144
`
`c,,H,.o,
`
`13
`2o
`50
`
`13
`20
`50
`1
`5
`12.5
`1
`
`5
`10
`20
`50
`3.3:1.0
`
`0.1
`0-2
`0.4
`0.3
`0.1
`0.2
`0.4
`
`0.2
`0.1
`0.4
`0.3
`
`2:
`17
`34
`
`44
`70
`1
`13
`28
`18
`as
`3
`15
`14
`31
`
`64
`
`25
`46
`61
`81
`20
`34
`42
`
`as
`22
`14
`20
`
`“Overall yield from aldehyde. “Analytical results are within $0.47: of the theoretical values unless otherwise noted. ‘See Experimental
`Section for protocol. ‘ Mixture of trans/cis; 1.4/ 1.
`'Percs11t inhibition calculated as if contribution of cls isomer was zero. ’Ansl. Calcd: C.
`68.99. Found: C. 68.54. ‘Mixture of tram/cis; 28/1. "Anal. Calcdz C. 72.82. Found: C. 72.27. ‘Mixture of trans/cis: 3.8/ l. 5 Mixture of
`trans/cis; 2/ 1. ‘Preparation of aldehyde. mp 112-116 °C; Hennion, G. F.; Fleck, B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 3253. ‘Preparation of
`aldehyde, mp 96-98 °C; Bergmann, E. D.; Weiler-Feilchenfeld, H.; Mandel. N. Viecnamica Chim. Acta 1966, 129; Chem. Abstr. 1972, 72,
`3276s. "Preparation of aldehyde. mp 42-44 ‘C: Kohler. E. P.; Larsen. R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985. 57. 1452.
`
`III. The decahydronaphthalenes 51 and 52 and tl1e ada-
`mantyl compound 53 all possessed similar activity, while
`the cyclohexanes 49 and 50 were less active. Aromatization
`of the cyclohexane ring to give the phenyl derivative 54
`had little effect on activity. However, substitution of the
`bridging moiety with larger aromatic groups such as those
`in compounds 55-57 increased activity about 10-fold, i.e.,
`to about 1% of the inhibitory activity of compactin.
`Scission of the 4a-4b bond of compound 56 provided a less
`compact molecule 58 with diminished activity.
`The [C3, and relative potency values of the most active
`compounds evaluated in this study are compared in Table
`IV. Although the compounds described above are only
`moderately active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. analysis
`of their intrinsic inhibitory activities suggests that inhibitor
`
`binding to HMG-COA reductase is sensitive (a) to the
`stereochemistry of the lactone moiety, (b) to the ability
`of the lactone moiety to be opened to s dihydroxy acid,
`(c) to the length of the moiety bridging the lactone and
`the lipophilic groups, and (d) to the size and shape of the
`lipophilic group. Further modifications of the lipophilic
`group leading to more potent inhibitors will be described
`in subsequent papers from these Laboratories.
`Experimental Section
`Melting points were determined on a Thomas-Hoover capillary
`melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Proton NMR
`spectra were recorded in CDCI3, unless noted otherwise, on either
`a Varian T-60, EM-390, or NT-360 spectrometer. Chemical shifts
`are reported in parts per million relative to Me.S1' as the internal
`standard. Elemental analysis for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3
`352
`Scheme 1
`
`Stokker et al.
`
`OH
`
`\
`
`\
`
`0
`
`0
`
`cu
`
`Cl
`
`c. D
`
`4
`
`O
`
`0
`
`CI
`
`OH
`
`OH
`
`0
`
`ocrig \ //' mHs
`
`co
`
`5
`
`cu
`
`\ an
`
`2 1
`
`., a
`OH
`
`CI
`
`Cl
`
`CI
`
`\
`
`7
`
`<31
`
`Cl
`
`OH
`
`61
`
`—'—
`
`CI
`
`4', 0,0
`
`OH
`
`H
`
`
`Illlc
`Cl d l
`+ (1
`
`30(2)
`
`BN3)
`
`OH
`
`0H
`
`63
`31;?‘
`0 "got":
`
`+ 6‘
`722:“ 0
`ocna CI
`
`9
`
`1.
`OH
`
`
`OH
`O
`
`/. 6'. D. 0
`
` NHz
`sou) + sat-)
`
`I0
`
`’’H'. ‘OH.
`-"éH,coEH,co,ci-1,.
`i (R)-(+ )-c,H,cH(cH,)NH,_
`
`‘*NaBH,,E:oH.°c,H,cH,,A.
`
`'1-r,,Rh/c.
`
`'Dibal. "cH,oH,rrTs.‘Ni-1,.
`
`Table IV. In Vitro Inhibitory Potencies against HMG-CoA
`Reductsse
`
`no.
`compactin
`6a(:2]
`6a(+)
`7
`13:
`16
`47
`51
`51
`55
`55
`57
`
`[C5o,"b
`uM
`0.01
`22
`10.8
`15.2
`20
`19.8
`129
`1M
`90
`1.9
`0.89
`1.6
`
`[Bl
`potency“
`100
`0.08
`0.18
`
`0.09
`0.08
`
`1.1
`1.5
`0.9
`
`°1C.,, is the rnicromolar concen-
`‘Relative precision is *10%.
`tration of the inhibitor required to give 50% inhibition under the
`conditions of the assay system.
`
`were determined with a Perkin-Elmer Model 240 elemental an-
`alyzer and are within :!:0.4% of theory unless noted otherwise.
`Optical rotations were determined with a Perkin-Emer Model
`141 polarirneter. All starting materials were commercially available
`unless indicated otherwise.
`3-(2,4-Dlohlorophenyl)-2-propane] (2) was prepared by
`modification of the procedure of Baker.” A solution of Nam!
`
`(23) Baker. B. R.; Janson. E. E.: Vermeulen. N. M. J. J. Med.
`Chem. 1969, I2, 898.
`
`(0.125 g) in CH,OH (2 mL) was added dropwise to a stirred
`suspension of 2.4-dichlorobenzaldehyde (7.5 g, 0.043 mol) in ac-
`etaldehyde (30 mL) cooled in an ice bath. The resulting solution
`was stirred 30 min with cooling, diluted with acetic anhydride
`(25 mL), and heated at 120 ‘C for 1 h. This mixture was cooled,
`diluted with H20 (60 ml.) and 6 N I-lCl (25 mL), and heated at
`100 °C for 0.5 h. The light brown, oily product solidified upon
`cooling. It was collected, dried, and triturated with Et4O to provide
`2 (8.5 5, 98%), mp 106-108 °C. An analytical sample was prepared
`by recrystallization from hexane to provide 2 as a pale yellow solid:
`mp 107-108 °C; NMR 6 6.70 (H, dd, J = 15, 6 Hz), 7.20-7.73 (3
`H, m). 7.87 (H. d, J - 15 Hz), 9.8 (H, d, J - 6 Hz). Anal.
`(C91-I.Cl,O) C, H.
`Methyl (E)-7-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-hydroxy-3-oxo-6-
`heptenoate (8) was prepared by a modification of the procedure
`of Weiler.“ Methyl aoetoaoetate (23.2 g, 0.2 mol) was added
`dropwise to a stirred suspension of sodium hydride (50% oil
`suspension) (10.5 g, 0.22 mol) in anhydrous THF (500 mL) at 0
`°C under a N2 atmosphere. The resulting solution was stirred
`15 min at 0 °C and then treated with a 2.2 M solution (95.4 mL,
`0.21 mol) of n-butyllithiurn in hexane over 10 min. The yellow
`solution was stirred 15 min at 0 ‘C and then was treated with
`a solution of 2 (44.2 g, 0.22 mol) in anhydrous T111‘ (250 mL).
`The resulting orange solution was stirred 15 min at 0 “C and then
`quenched by dropwise addition of 12 N HCl (48 mL). The reaction
`mixture was diluted with 1-120 (300 mL) and extracted with Et,O
`(3 X 300 mL). The organic extracts were combined, washed with
`brine (2 X 200 mL). dried over MgSO.. and filtered. The filtrate
`was evaporated in vacuo. leaving a red oil. The red oil was stirred
`in petroleum ether (200 mL) in order to remove the mineral oil.
`The mixture was cooled and the petroleum ether decanted to
`provide 62.8 g (90%) of 3: NMR 6 2.83 (2 H, d, J I 6 Hz). 3.47
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`
`HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3 353
`
`Schema ll
`
`,_ 5
`2 H3.-
`
`Cl
`
`CI
`
`OH
`
`O
`
`CH3
`
`\
`
`11
`
`/ \
`
`0
`CI
`DJl\°/B’
`C]
` fi \
`
`Q
`
`Cl
`
`12
`
`14
`
`'
`
`Cl
`
`\
`
`15
`
`/40,1"
`
`Schema Ill
`
`Cl
`
`OCH;
`
`2
`
`.
`
`cn
`
` ocH3 + U _"_‘.
`
`0
`
`I3
`
`Cl
`
`OCH! 0
`
`0
`
`\
`
`OCH;
`
`."_"'.
`
`0/
`
`0
`
`CH3
`
`Cl
`
`OE?
`
`CH3
`
`r;{MeOH_PTSA.
`Scherne IV
`
`19
`
`Cl
`
`cu
`
`och, on
`
`0
`
`\
`
`OH
`
`20
`
`1* TiC|,. °Me0H.
`
`4 NaBH.-
`
`‘OH’-
`
`H0
`
`$CH3
`
`61
`o 4- cm isomcr
`13b
`
`\\\“ O
`
`C’
`
`Cl
`
`13¢
`
`/ \
`CH3
`8‘
`
`H0
`
`CH3
`
`17
`
`CI
`
`b no,cco,H.
`- (n-au),snocn,,cn,=c(oAc)cn .
`BrCH,COBr,C,H,N.
`«1 zn.cuBr.éz,A1c1.
`° Ac,O,
`.
`fBrcH,co,E:. ‘on: ’'H‘. *A,c,H,cH,.
`,, nmc.
`* PTSA, c,H,cH,, A.
`(2 H, s),
`.70 (3 H, 8), 4.76 (H.111), 6.13 (H, dd. J - 15, 6 Hz), 6.90
`(H. cl. J - 15 Hz). 7.0-7.5 (3 H. In).
`(E)-6-[2-(2.4-Dichlorophonyl)athenyl]-5,6-dihydro-L
`hydroxy-2H-pyran~2-one (4). The ester 3 (2.0 3, 6.3 mmol) was
`stirred in 0.1 N NaOH (200 mL) for 4 h. The resulting solution
`was acidified with 6 N HCl to provide a yellow solid which was
`recrystallized to analytical purity: yield 0.93 3; NMR (M°gS0’d3)
`6 2.60 (2 H, m), 5.00 (H, s), 5.13 (H, m), 4.67 (H, dd, J II 15, 6
`Hz), 6.97 (H. d. J = 15 Hz), 7.27-7.87 (3 H, m), 11.5 (H, br s).
`Methyl
`(E)-7-(2,-4-Diohlorophanyl)-3,5-dlhydl'oxy-8-
`hepteaoato (5). Sodium borohydride (1.3 g, 33.7 mmol) was
`added with stirring to a cooled solution (5 'C) of 3 (10.7 g, 33.7
`mmol) in Et0H (100 mL) at a rate sufficient to maintain the
`internal umperature at 15-20 ‘C. The resulting solution was
`stirred an additional 2 h with ice-bath oooling and then acidified
`with 6 N HCI. The resulting mixture was diluted with H10 (250
`ml.) and extracted with Et.,0 (3 X 200 mL). The Etg0 extracts
`were combined. washed with brine, dried over MgSO., and filtered.
`The filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to provide a yellow oil (10.4
`g, 97%). A portion of the oil was purified by medium-pressure
`chromatography on a 25 X 1000 mm silical gel column. Elution
`
`..."“
`
`° LiCH=CHOC,H,.
`
`5 Silica gel.
`
`Scheme V
`
`HO
`
`21
`
`C02H
`
`/
`
`’
`
`* @ A
`
`22
`
`H §\,C0zE'
`
`H” §.\,oozn
`
`H” \.\,cuo
`
`+
`
`5:!
`
`H
`
`24
`
`::Im
`
`28
`
`Sun
`
`27
`
`1* I-1,,Ru/C, moi-I.
`H cH,(co,H),,c,H,N.
`d H,,Pd.’C,2,6-(Me),C,H,N.
`9 AlCl,.
`foH-.
`
`C soc1,.
`-1 H‘.
`
`with CH9Cl,-CHa0H (49:1. v/v: 500 mL) Drovided a forerun which
`was discarded. Continued elution with the same eluant (3500 mL)
`provided 5 as a yellow oil; NMR 6 1.60-1.93 (2 H, m), 2.50 (2 H,
`d,J I 6 Hz), 3.67 (3 H, 3), 4.13-4.77 (2 H, m), 5.93-6.40 (H,m),
`6.93 (H, d, J I 15 Hz), 7.17—7.50 (3 H, in). Anal. (C1,!-l,.Cl,0‘)
`H: C: calcd, 52.68; found, 52.25.
`(E)-6-[2-(2,4-Dichlorophonyl)ethenyl]-3,4,5,6-totrahydro-
`4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-one (6a(t) and 6b(t)). An E101-I so-
`lution (100 mL) containing 5 (8.4 g, 26.3 mmol) and 1 N NaOH
`
`Sawai Ex 1023
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3
`364
`Scheme V]
`
`=' * @@
`
`©@
`
`o -@<<§ oo
`
`32
`
`33
`
`_L_
`
`CN
`
`CHO
`
`34
`
`3
`
`0 NCC1-I,C0,i-i, Nn,oAc. C,H,N.
`4 NaCN.
`Scheme VII
`
`° H,, Pd/C.
`
`c Dibai.
`
`CI
`
`Cl
`
`OH
`
`/ LL
`
`CI
`
`Cl
`
`35
`
`° BrCH,CH(0Et),.
`Schema VIII
`
`cu
`
`'’ 2N H,so..
`
`CHO
`
`37
`
`cu
`
`‘ ‘
`2 4.
`
`cl
`
`°'
`
`cu
`
`\ cno
`3!
`
`E
`a
`
`38
`
`CH(0E1)g
`
`3'
`
`\
`
`39
`
`cu
`
`1.
`
`cu
`
`c=c—cH<oen), 1-
`
`40
`
`"
`
`Cl CECCHO 7-"-'5
`
`41
`
`U
`
`C\‘\\ 0
`
`c/¢
`
`O —"
`
`Cl
`
`42
`
`or
`
`Cl
`
`on
`
`fl
`
`0
`
`0
`
`\\“\
`43
`
`° (Eto),CH,NH,,ci. d KOH.
`" K,Co,.
`4 Br,
`9 Dilute H,so,,.
`’ 5-7. Pd/CsCO,.
`(26.8 mL) was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 h. The
`reaction solution was acidified with 8 N HCl. diluted with H20
`(200 mL), and extracted with Ego (3 x 100 mL). The combined
`
`Stokker et al.
`
`organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO., and
`filtered The filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to provide a mixture
`of acid and lactone (7.8 g, 97%). A solution of this mixture in
`toluene (100 mL) was heated at reflux in a Dean—Stark apparatus.
`After 2 h, the Dean—Stark apparatus was replaced with a Soxhlet
`containing 3-A molecular sieves (100 g). The solution was refluxed
`for an additioml 4 h and than the toluene was removed in vacuo
`leaving a yellow oil (7.2 g, 95%) which was a mixture of 6s(-.l:]
`and 6h(#). The oil was ehroamtographed on a silica gel column
`(500 g). Elution with CH,Cl2-acetone (4:l, v/v; 9(1) mL) provided
`a forerim which was discarded. Continued elution with the same
`eluant (300 mL) gave the trans isomer 6a(:) (2.5 g). Recrys-
`tallization of the solid provided an analytical sample. as colorless
`needles: NMR (acetone-dg) 6 2.06 (2 H, m), 2.69 (2 H, m), 4.43
`(H, m), 5.42 (H, In), 6.49 (H, dd, J = 15, 6 Hz), 7.08 (H, d, J -
`15 Hz). 7.33-7.59 (2 H. m), 7.79 (H. d, J = 8 Hz). An isomeric
`purity of 99.8% was determined for 6a(:£) by HPLC on a
`Whatman Partisil-5 RAC column with 15% 2-propanol/hexane
`as the eluant. The time of elution was 4.96 min at a flow rate
`of 6 mL/min.
`Further elution of the column with the same eluant (600 mL)
`gave the cis isomer 6h(i) as a solid (1.25 g). Recrystallization
`gave an analytical sample as colorless needles: NMR (acetone-d.)
`6 1.50-2.93 (4 H, m), 4.35 (H, m), 5.02 (H, m), 6.37 (H, dd, J 3
`15, 6 Hz), 7.02 (H, d, J 8 15 Hz), 7.16-7.50 (2 H, In), 7.67 (H, d,
`J = 8 Hz). An isomeric purity of 99.3% was determined for 6h(:h)
`by HPLC on a Whatnian Partisil-5 RAC column with 15% 2-
`propanol/hexane as the elunrit. The time of elution was 5.79 min
`at a flow rate of 6 mL/min.
`trans-6-[2-(2,4-Dlchlorophenyl)ethyl]-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-
`I-hydroxy-2H-pyran—2—one (7). A solution of 6a(*) (1.5 g, 6.2
`mmol) in THF (100 mL) was stirred magnetically and hydro-
`genated at room temperature under atmospheric pressure in the
`presence of 5% rhodium on carbon (150 mg) until 1.25 molar equiv
`of hydrogen had been consumed. After removal of the catalyst
`by filtration, the filtrate was evaporated in vacuo, leaving a solid.
`The solid was recrystallized to provide 7 (0.9 g): NMR 6 1.67-2.17
`(4 H, in). 2.60-3.13 (4 H, m), 4.30-4.50 (H. m). 4.57-4.90 (H, In),
`7.14-7.44 (3 H. In).
`Resolution of (t)-trans -(E)-0-(2-(2.4-Dlchlorophenyl)-
`ethenyl]-3,d.5.6-tetrahydro—4-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-one (6a).
`A solution of 6a(£) (2.87 g, 10 mmol) in (R)-(+)-a-methyl-
`benzylamlne (15 mL) was stirred for 16 h at ambient temperature
`and then poured into H20 (100 mL). This aqueous mixture was
`acidified with 6 N HCI and extracted with Et40 (3 X 100 mL).
`The Etao extracts were combined, washed with brine, dried over
`MgSO., and filtered. Evaporation of the filtrate in vacuo provided
`the crude diastereomeric amides as a tan viscous oil (4.1 g, 100%).
`This oil (3.1 g. 7.6 mmol) was chromatographed on a silica gel
`column (200 g). Elution with acetone-CH,Cl, (124, v/v; 1200 mL)
`gave a forerun which was discarded. Continued elution with the
`same eluant provided the mixture of diastereomeric amides as
`a viscous oil (3.0 g, 97%). This mixture was separated by chro-
`matography on a Waters Prep LC 500. The separation was
`accomplished by using two Prep PAK-500 silica cartridges in series
`and eluting with acetone-CH,Clg (1:4, v/v). Use of the shave-
`recycle technique provided diastereomer A (1.36 g) and diaste-
`reomer B (1.2 g).
`Recrystallization of diastereozner A from n-butyl chloride gave
`colorless clusters (10 g) which

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket