`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01508
`Patent No. 6,542,076
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper
`
`No. 11), Petitioner Nissan North America, Inc. respectfully submits this Request
`
`for Oral Argument. As set forth in the Scheduling Order, the Board has scheduled
`
`oral argument for October 20, 2016. Paper No. 11, at 5.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claims 3, 20, 73, 103, and 205 under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 102 in view of Exhibit 1004, E.P. 0505266 to Frossard et al. (“Frossard”);
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 65 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Frossard and Exhibit 1006, U.S. 5,276,728 to Pagliaroli et al. (“Pagliaroli”);
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 93 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Frossard and Exhibit 1008, U.S. 5,081,667 to Drori et al. (“Drori”);
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 104 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Frossard and Exhibit 1009, U.S. 6,236,365 to LeBlanc et al. (“LeBlanc”);
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 108 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Frossard and Exhibit 1007, U.S. 5,334,974 to Simms et al. (“Simms”); and
`
`Pagliaroli and Simms;
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claims 3, 20, 65, 73, 93, and 205 under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 102 in view of Pagliaroli;
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 103 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Pagliaroli and Frossard;
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 104 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Pagliaroli and LeBlanc;
`
`•
`
`The unpatentability of claim 108 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
`
`Pagliaroli and Simms;
`
`•
`
`Any other issues identified by Patent Owner for oral argument or any
`
`other issues raised in papers yet to be filed; and
`
`Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`•
`
`decision.
`
`Petitioner requests permission to use audio/visual equipment at the oral
`
`argument,
`
`including a projector and screen for displaying evidence or
`
`demonstrative exhibits.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /David C. Holloway/
`David C. Holloway
`Registration No. 58,011
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Nissan North America, Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this PETITIONER
`
`NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`has been served electronically via e-mail to PG_JCMS@hgdlawfirm.com (as
`
`consented to by the Patent Owner) on September 8, 2016, and upon the following:
`
`René A. Vazquez
`Registration No. 38,647
`HENINGER GARRISON
` DAVIS, LLC
`18296 St. Georges Ct.
`Leesburg, VA 20176
`Email: rvazquez@hgdlawfirm.com
` rvazquez@sinergialaw.com
`Tel.: (571) 206-1375
`
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`Joao Control & Monitoring Systems,
`LLC
`Steven W. Ritcheson
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`INSIGHT
`A PROFESSIONAL LAW
`CORPORATION
`9800D Topanga Canyon Blvd. #347
`Chatsworth, CA 91311
`Email: swritcheson@insightplc.com
`
`Tel.: (818) 882-1030
`
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`Joao Control & Monitoring Systems,
`LLC
`
`Raymond A. Joao
`Registration No. 35,907
`122 Bellevue Place
`Yonkers, NY 10703
`Email: rayjoao@optonline.net
`Tel.: (914) 969-2992
`
`
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`Joao Control & Monitoring Systems,
`LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/David C. Holloway /
`David C. Holloway
`Registration No. 58,011
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Nissan North America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 8, 2016